Next Article in Journal
Environmental Modulation of Mini-Clonal Gardens for Cutting Production and Propagation of Hard- and Easy-to-Root Eucalyptus spp
Next Article in Special Issue
Effective Resistance to Four Fungal Foliar Diseases in Samples of Wild Triticum L. Species from the VIR (N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources) Collection: View from Vavilov’s Concepts of Plant Immunity
Previous Article in Journal
Insight into Population Structure and Evolutionary Analysis of the Emerging Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Throughput Phenotypic Characterization and Diversity Analysis of Soybean Roots (Glycine max L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Evaluating Germplasm of Cultivated Oat Species from the VIR Collection under the Russian Northwest Conditions

by
Vitaliy S. Popov
1,*,
Valentina I. Khoreva
1,
Alexei V. Konarev
1,
Tatyana V. Shelenga
1,
Elena V. Blinova
1,
Leonid L. Malyshev
1 and
Igor G. Loskutov
1,2
1
N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, 42-44 Bolshaya Morskaya Street, 190000 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Department of Agrochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., 190000 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3280; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233280
Submission received: 20 May 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022

Abstract

:
Oat is one of the most widespread and important cereal crops in the global agricultural production. Searching for new high-yielding and nutritious forms continues to be relevant, especially under the global trend of climate change, when most local oat cultivars may become economically inefficient. Spring oat accessions from VIR collection served as the material for this study; their origin is diverse, as they came from 11 countries. The basic nutritional value (the content of protein, oil, starch, and β-glucans) and characters important for breeding (plant height, panicle length, number of spikelets, number of grains per panicle, 1000 grain weight, and grain yield) were analyzed in 49 accessions of the cultivated covered oat species: Avena sativa L., A. strigosa Schreb., A. abyssinica Hochst., and A. byzantina Coch., grown under the conditions of the Russian Northwest (Leningrad Province) for two years. Variability parameters, interspecific and intervarietal differences, and the effect of weather conditions were assessed. Sources of useful agronomic traits were identified; they can be used to expand the range of the source material for the development of new high-yielding and highly nutritious oat cultivars adapted to local cultivation conditions. It is demonstrated that the VIR collection has a great potential for contemporary food and feed production and for the breeding of new oat cultivars for various purposes. Thus, the contribution of Nikolai Vavilov to the plant genetic resources investigation for the benefit of humanity is invaluable.

1. Introduction

Oat is one of the most widespread and important cereal crops in the system of agricultural production in temperate climates. This crop is important for food and feed industries due to the chemical composition of its grain. Oat-based food products are distinguished for their high protein content with a favorable amino acid composition [1]; high content of oil, rich in fat-soluble vitamin E and polyunsaturated fatty acids, with an optimal fatty acid composition [2,3,4,5,6]; high content of oat-specific antioxidants (avenanthramides) [7]; and a sufficient set of vitamins and macro- and micronutrients [6,8,9], and an optimal ratio of amylose and amylopectin in starch [10,11,12]. Special attention has been paid in recent years to oat and barley β-glucans, with their numerous functional and bioactive properties. Beta-glucans belong to the class of indigestible polysaccharides found in grains, yeasts, bacteria, algae, and fungi [13,14].
Oat-based foods are beneficial for people with insulin-resistant forms of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia [15]. In addition, the safety of including oat in a gluten-free diet has been confirmed in long-term studies [15,16,17]. Thus, oat is a highly nutritious cereal crop suitable for curative, preventive, and functional nutrition [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In addition to food and feed nutritive value, there are such important breeding-oriented characters, such as plant height (PH), panicle length (LP), number of spikelets (NSP), number of grains per panicle (NG), 1000 grain weight (W1000), and grain yield, or seed productivity (SP). These descriptors characterize the economically important features [18]. Thus, it is important to undertake integrated evaluations of useful agronomic characters as well as food and feed values.
With the global climate change, many of the local crop cultivars, including oats, may become economically inefficient. Therefore, searching for new forms of high-yielding and nutritious oat cultivars is now especially pertinent. The optimal approach to solving this problem is a systematic and integrated study of the biodiversity preserved in the collections of plant genetic resources. The works started by Vavilov and continued by his colleagues on the germplasm material from the VIR collection are still underway [19]. Since Vavilov’s times, the VIR global collection of plant genetic resources, including Avena L., has been replenished by collecting missions sent to different regions of the 81 world and through germplasm exchange with other plant genetic resources centers and 82 research institutes. Currently, the collection of oats includes about 14,000 accessions, representing various species and originating from different parts of the world.
Screening numerous accessions from the VIR collection includes the assessment of their main breeding-oriented characters and biochemical indicators to identify plant forms/accessions, which offer the best combinations of traits for breeding. Such selected accessions, according to the guidelines [20], are called “donors or sources of useful agronomic traits”, which entails their in-depth studying and subsequent utilization in various breeding programs. The present research effort is one of the stages in an integrated study of accessions representing cultivated oat species from the VIR collection.
The objective was to assess the variability of the various cultivated oat accessions for the following biochemical and agronomic characters: protein, oil, starch and β-glucan content, PH, LP, NSP, NG, W1000, and SP. The assayed accessions represent different ploidy level: A. sativa (2 n = 42), A. byzantina (2 n = 42), A. abyssinica (2 n = 28) and A. strigosa (2 n = 14) from the VIR collection. The trials were conducted for two years in the fields of the Russian Northwest region (Leningrad Province). Specifically, the variability of all studied indicators and properties, interspecific and intervarietal differences, and the effect of weather conditions on the studied characters were observed and documented. A number of oat accessions were identified as sources of high agronomic value for various uses: plant breeding, fodder production, and food industry, including the use for medicinal and functional products.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Description of Characters Valuable for Breeding

More than 250 plant characters showing hereditary differences [20,21,22,23,24] have been identified by now within the oat species. Information on the characters valuable for breeding in the studied oat accessions—plant height (PH), panicle length (LP), number of spikelets per panicle (NSP), number of grains per panicle (NG), 1000 grain weight (W1000), and grain yield, or seed productivity (SP)—are presented in Table S4 in the Supplementary Materials.
Average SPs (g/m2) for A. sativa, A. abyssinica, A. byzantina and A. strigosa accessions were 276.3, 55.0, 203.3 and 96.7 in 2014, and 350.0, 191.7, 307.3 and 106.0 in 2015, respectively. Grain yield of A. sativa accessions in 2014 was higher compared to the reference cultivar ‘Privet’ (260.0), while in 2015 there were no accessions that exceeded the SP value of the reference (490.0). However, the accessions of A. sativa and A. byzantina had the highest average grain yields, because their plants were the most vigorous. Grain yields of all oat cultivars in 2015, which was more humid and cool during the grain ripening period, were higher compared to 2014.
According to the W1000 value, the oat accession could be with small grains (W1000 is less than 26 g), large grains (W1000 is more than 35 g) and 128 middle ones [25]. A. sativa and A. byzantine accessions, taken in current investigation, belonged to the large grains group, A. abyssinica and A. strigosa to the small grains. This division was confirmed by the conclusions of N.A. Rodionova et al. [25]: A. sativa and A. byzantine accessions, by virtue of their polyploidy, belong to the group of genotypes with large grains, while A. abyssinica and A. strigosa accessions belong to the group with small grains. The variability range of W1000 values in 2014 and 2015 was nearly the same as was from 18.9 (k-15438, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) to 51.5 g (k-15484, Brazil) in 2014, and from 18.1 (k-15436, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) to 52.6 g (k-15484, Brazil) in 2015. The highest mean of W1000 values corresponded to A. byzantina, and then followed accessions of A. sativa, A. strigosa and A. abyssinica (41.8, 41.0, 21.5, 20.4 in 2014, and 44.0, 42.3, 23.1, 17.8 g in 2015, respectively).
NG in an oat panicle can vary from less than 30 pcs. up to more than 60 pcs. [25]. In the studied oat accessions, it ranged from 23 (k-15489, Brazil) to 75 (k-15381, Belarus) in 2014, and from 26 (k-15489, Brazil) to 79 (k-15381, Belarus) in 2015. The average of NG in all accessions of the studied species in 2015 was higher compared to 2014. The highest NG was identified in A. abyssinica accessions, then followed A. sativa, A. strigosa and A. byzantine.
NSP in the studied set of accessions varied from 15 (k-15435, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) to 60 (k-15478, Brazil) in 2014, and from 13 (k-15489, Brazil) to 55 (k-15437, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) in 2015. The average values of NSPs in the studied species did not differ significantly in both years of study. Due to the large panicle length, the accessions of A. strigosa and A. abyssinica demonstrated the highest NSP, while A. byzantina and A. sativa accessions had the smallest ones (52.7, 43.7, 31.7, 26.4 in 2014, and 48.0, 46.7, 34.7, 26.9 in 2015, respectively).
Oat LP parameters can range from less than 15 to more than 30 cm [25]. In the current investigation, the LP variation was from 13 (k-15489, Brazil) to 26 (k-15437, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) in 2014, and from 12.5 (k-15489, Brazil) to 27 (k-15437, Ethiopia, A. abyssinica) in 2015. Accessions of the studied species had approximately the same average LPs in both years of study. The highest value was detected for the A. abyssinica accessions, then followed A. strigose, A. sativa and A. byzantine (24.0, 20.3, 19.7, 18.1 in 2014 and 27.3, 20.5, 18.3, 17.4 in 2015, respectively).
Rodionova et al. [25] approved that oat PH can vary in the range from more than 170 to less than 60 cm. Among accessions taken in the current study, the PH values varied from 80 (k-15489, Brazil) to 150 (k-15478, k-15479, Brazil) in 2014, and from 55 (k-15489, Brazil) to 165 cm (k-15478, Brazil) in 2015. The average values of PH in 2014 were slightly higher than that in 2015. A. strigosa accessions demonstrated the highest PHs, which is typical for this species [25], and those of A. byzantine demonstrated the smallest values. A. sativa, A. abyssinica occupied an intermediate position (148.3, 114.0, 126.7, 116.7 in 2014, and 146.7, 98.3, 104.3, 116.7 cm in 2015, respectively).
Field experiments carried out in the central highlands of Ethiopia revealed the relationship between species affiliation of studied accessions and manifestation of their agronomic traits [26,27], which is confirmed by our results.
The ranking of the oat species according to the agronomic descriptions in ascending order was as follows: (PH) A. byzantina, A. sativa, A. abyssinica, A. strigose; (NSP) A. byzantina, A. sativa, A. abyssinica, A. strigosa; (SP) A. strigosa, A. abyssinica, A. byzantina, A. sativa; (LP) A. strigosa, A. abyssinica, A. sativa, A. byzantina; (NG) A. byzantina, A. strigosa, A. sativa, A. abyssinica; (W1000) A. abyssinica, A. strigosa, A. sativa, A. byzantina. The assessed oat species had almost similar orders of arrangement according to LP and NSP. The values of the NSP indicator in A. byzantina accessions were twice lower than in A. strigosa accessions. Panicles of A. byzantina accessions were, on average, almost 1.5 times shorter than those of A. abyssinica. Average W1000 values turned out to be almost the same in both years of research. The values of the LP and NSP indicators in 2015 did not differ much from those in 2014. Average PH values were higher in 2014 compared to 2015. The highest NG and SP values were recorded for oat accessions grown in 2015. Thus, the grain yield and plant height indicators in oat accessions were inversely related to each other.
According to Grib and Kadyrov, the shortening of stems entails a decrease in some plant productivity parameters (NSP, W1000 and SP) [22]. Thus, we distinguished those accessions that exceeded the productivity of the reference cv. ‘Privet’ (33.0 pcs., 38.1 g, and 375.0 g/m2). Five accessions (A. sativa: k-15443, 15444, 15457; A. byzantine: k-15465) demonstrated higher values of SP, three (A. sativa: k-15457, 15473, A. byzantine: k-15465)—NSP, four (A. sativa: k-15444, k-15453, k-15457 and k-15473)—W1000 compare with cv. ‘Privet’ (Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials). The selected oat accessions included ones (k-15443, k-15444, k-15453, k-15473 and k-15465) with lower PH (107.5, 107.5, 110.0, 105.0, 110.0 cm, respectively) and k-15457 with higher (127.5 cm) compare with PH of cv. ‘Privet’ (112.5 cm).
The range of PH of 48 oat’s genotypes conducted in the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Wellington, was narrower (from 61.47 to 118.63 cm) and PH mean lower (94.03 cm) [28] compared with the VIR accessions.
According to Premkumar et al., the range of oat’s W1000 (from 21.86 to 58.45) was wider, mean of W1000 (39.00 g) higher [29], but range of NG (32.00-74.33) was narrower and mean of NG (51.47) higher [28] compared with the data obtained in the current investigation.

2.2. Description of Biochemical Indicators

All accessions selected for the study demonstrated significant variability in protein, oil, starch and β-glucan content (Table 1, Figure 1A–D).
The highest scope of variation in protein content was observed in the accessions of A. sativa and A. byzantina in 2014 (9.0% and 6.7%, respectively). The scope of variation for A. abyssinica and A. strigosa was 2.1 and 2.2%, respectively. In 2015, the maximum scope variability was manifested by the accessions of A. byzantina (4.7%) and A. sativa (3.3%). Varietal differences were statistically less significant in A. abyssinica (0.3) and A. strigosa (1.1%) accessions. Two-year average varietal differences in protein content for A. sativa, A. abyssinica, A. strigosa and A. byzantina were 13.7–12.2, 15.6–15.0, 19.5–17.8 and 14.7–12.2%, respectively. Thus, different cultivated oat species can have variable protein content (Table 1, Figure 1A).
Protein content in oat grain is one of the most important indicators of quality; this parameter is associated with the nutritional and fodder qualities of the crop [30]. On average, the amount of protein ranges from 11.7 to 15.1% [31] and depends on the cultivar, weather conditions, and the level of agricultural practice. In our studies, 2015 was wetter and less favorable for protein accumulation and grain formation, as shown by the lower protein content in all species compared to 2014 (Figure 4, Table S2 of the Supplementary Materials). Persistently high protein content over the two-year period of studies was found in diploid accessions of A. strigosa: k-15478, k-15479 and k-15480 from Brazil (19.5–17.8%); tetraploid A. abyssinica: k-15436 from Ethiopia (15.2–16.6%); hexaploid A. sativa: k-15476 and k-15483 from the USA and Brazil (18.3–14.7%) and A. byzantina: k-15474 from the USA, and k-15484 and k-15488 from Brazil (17.9–14.5%). The values of cv. ‘Privet’ (k-14787, reference) were significantly lower (12.5–11.8%) (Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials).
According to published data [32], the amount of protein in the grain of crops grown in the northern regions of the Russian Federation increased with the movement of their cultivation areas from north to south and from west to east. Hence, it can be assumed that protein content in the same oat cultivars that were grown in Leningrad Province will be higher if they are cultivated farther south or east. Our data are compatible with the results obtained by Kazakh, Polish and Italian researchers [10,33,34].
The nutritional and biological value of oats also depends on the oil content; its levels vary from 3.5 to 6.2% in covered oat cultivars of different origin, and from 7.1 to 9.0% in naked oat cultivars [12]. The grain of some cultivars, however, may contain up to 18% of oil [2]. If the breeding of high-oil oat cultivars proves successful, then in the future oats can be classified as oilseeds and efficiently used in chemical and pharmaceutical industries [35].
Among the studied oat accessions, the highest varietal variability in oil content was observed in A. byzantina accessions: 3.1 to 5.8% in 2014, and 3.2 to 6.1% in 2015. Slightly less variable in oil were A. sativa accessions: 3.3 to 5.7% in 2014, and 3.7 to 6.0% in 2015. These accessions demonstrated varietal differences of 2.7 and 2.9% in 2014, and 2.4 and 2.3% in 2015, respectively. The minimum varietal variability was observed in diploid A. strigosa accessions: 3.9 to 4.1% in 2014, and 3.9 to 4.3% in 2015, as well as in tetraploid A. abyssinica accessions: 4.4 to 4.5% in 2014, but in 2015 the amount of oil increased by 0.8–0.7% to 5.2–5.4% (Table 1, Figure 1B). In 2015, a large amount of rainfall in July contributed to the formation of moisture reserves in the soil and provided an opportunity for intensive oil synthesis in oat grains, despite the dry weather in August (Figure 4, Table S2 of the Supplementary Materials). These results demonstrated that the decisive factor in the accumulation of oil in oat grains was the presence of moisture at the stages of grain development and ripening. On average, over two years, the differences in oil content for A. sativa accessions were 4.4–4.6, for A. byzantina 4.4–4.7, for A. abyssinica 4.5–5.2, and for A. strigosa 4.0–4.1%. Accessions of A. strigosa had the lowest oil content (Figure 1B, Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials). With such an insignificant variability in most of the studied accessions, 10 sources of high oil content under the conditions of Leningrad Province were identified: for A. abyssinica, k-15438 from Ethiopia (5.4); for A. sativa, k-15453, k-15455 from Russia and k-15483 from Brazil (5.48, 5.21 and 5.86, respectively); for A. byzantina, k-15368 from Portugal, k-15397 from the UK, k-15435 from Ethiopia, k-15470 from Germany, k-15475 from the USA, and k-15489 from Brazil (5.54, 5.66, 5.24, 5.18, 5,63 and 5.52, respectively). The oil content in their grains was higher than in the reference (4.95%) (Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials). According to published data, the variability of oil content in covered oat cultivars had close values in the range of 4.4 to 7.2% [31,34,35].
The oat grain by its starch structure resembles the rice grain but differs significantly from the wheat grain [10]. Oat starch decomposes slowly but completely, without provoking an abrupt rise in blood glucose levels after eating, which is beneficial for patients with diabetes. Slow absorption of glucose into the blood is believed to be caused by the presence of a significant number of β-glucans in oat [36]. Starch content is a relatively stable character, with a lesser degree of dependence on growing conditions compared to protein content [37]. Our research confirmed this fact: protein content in all studied oat cultivars was on average higher in 2014 than in 2015. Meanwhile, starch content did not demonstrate such a clear dependence, and the effect of the year on accessions of different oat species manifested itself in different ways. According to published data [38], starch content in the oat grain ranged from 23.7 to 69.5%, depending on the species and cultivar. The starch content in the oat accessions we studied was lower and ranged from 27.3 to 42.75% in 2014, and from 30.72 to 45.52% in 2015 (Table 1, Figure 1C). The significant sorts variability of protein and starch content in A. sativa, A. byzantina and A. strigose in the different year of reproduction was detected in the current study and associated with the peculiarities of the response of those species to changing environmental conditions (temperature; rainfall), which we noted earlier [21].
The study of covered oat accessions performed in 2010–2012 in the environments of Western Siberia (southern forest-steppe) demonstrated that the variation of starch content was within the range from 38.6 to 48.8%, with an average of 43.8% [39], which was somewhat higher than our data. Avena sativa accessions grown in the Netherlands on sandy and clay soils demonstrated an even higher starch level in the grain: 45.6 to 66.5%, on average, 53.1%, which is also higher than in the accessions we studied [40].
Oat, along with barley, is also characterized by high contents of non-starch polysaccharides, β-glucans, and glucose polymers. The content of β-glucans in the oat grain is, on average, lower than in barley (from 3 to 11), but higher than in rye (1–2%), wheat (<1%), and other cereals, where they are present in trace amounts [15]. Commercial samples of oat bran contain 7–10% of β-glucans [41]. Cereals are potentially the least expensive source of glucans, which favors their use as food additives and food ingredients in functional foods available to a wide range of consumers. In addition, there are no data on any negative effects after eating foods rich in β-glucans from oat or barley flour or their extracts [42]. At the same time, the problem of reducing the amount of dietary fiber exhibiting antinutritional properties is an urgent problem in animal feed production [15].
Our data demonstrated that the amplitude of intervarietal variability of β-glucans in the 308 studied accessions was 2.19 to 5.77% in 2014, and 2.46 to 4.83% in 2015. The least variability in both years of research was observed in A. byzantina: 0.03 and 0.07% (Table 1, Figure 1D). The high and stable content of β-glucans was preserved in the accessions of A. strigosa: k-15479 from Brazil (3.73), A. sativa: k-15447, 15451, 15452 and 15454 from Russia (4.42, 4.54, 3.74 and 4.08, respectively), and A. byzantina: k-15368 from Portugal (4.26), compared to cv. ‘Privet’ (reference) (2.95%). These accessions are the most valuable for use in food industry with the purpose of expanding the assortment of functional foods. As a result of the study, accessions with the lowest content of β-glucans (2.49–2.46%) were identified: k-15480 (A. strigosa) from Brazil (2.49%), and k-15436 (A. abyssinica) from Ethiopia (2.46%); they can be used as forage in animal husbandry (Table S3 of the Supplementary Materials).
The results of studying β-glucans in oat grain, presented by different authors, differ significantly from one another. According to V.I. Polonskiy et al., naked oat accessions did not noticeably prevail over covered oats in the content of β-glucans. The grain of covered oat accessions could accumulate from 2.9 to 5.2% of β-glucans [31]. At the same time, recent studies have demonstrated that the content of β-glucans in covered oats is about 3% [43]. The study of 1700 mutagenic lines of the Swedish oat cultivar ‘Belinda’ resulted in finding that their content of β-glucans ranged from 1.8 to 7.5% [15]. Our data were fully consistent with the published information: the average value of β-glucans was 3.52% in 2014, and 3.30% in 2015.
Environmental conditions were observed to have a significant impact on the content of β-glucans in oat grain during the development of the endosperm: dry and warm weather contributes to a significant increase in β-glucans [15]. Our data confirmed those findings: the smallest amount of β-glucans was in the grain harvested in 2015. Thus, high humidity during the ripening phase is less favorable for the synthesis of β-glucans (Figure 4, Table S2 of the Supplementary Materials).
Thus, the protein content in the studied material decreased across the accessions in the following order: A. strigosa, A. abyssinica, A. byzantina and A. sativa, while the oil content drops as follows: A. abyssinica, A. byzantina, A. sativa and A. strigosa. Higher protein levels were recorded for accessions of all species in 2014, and oils in 2015. A. sativa accessions had the highest starch values, followed in descending order by A. byzantina, A. strigosa and A. abyssinica accessions. The effect of weather conditions on starch accumulation was not as obvious as it was with oil and protein content. A. strigosa and A. byzantina accessions had the highest starch content in 2014, and A. byzantina and A. sativa in 2015. The content of β-glucans increases in the accessions in the following order: A. abyssinica, A. strigosa, A. byzantina and A. sativa. For all species, except A. abyssinica, the content of β-glucans was higher in 2014: dry and warm weather was more favorable for the synthesis of these compounds. It can be concluded that dry and warm weather contributed to protein accumulation in the Leningrad Province, while wet and cooler weather, on the contrary, stimulated oil accumulation. This fact is consistent with published data. Higher humidity sets up favorable conditions for the work of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of oil. Under moisture deficiency, transpiration grows faster than the accumulation of carbohydrates in leaves. The result is a decrease in oil content and an increase in protein formation [23,44].
A successful breeding normally requires the understanding of the interactions among grain quality indicators (protein, starch, oil and β-glucan content) for specific crop growing conditions. Thus, we performed the analysis of trait correlation, and the results are presented in Table 2.
Correlations between the main indicators of grain quality confirmed the impact of weather conditions on the strength and direction of these relationships. In 2014, there were weak positive correlations between protein and oil and between starch and oil, and a moderately strong positive correlation between starch and protein accumulation (Table 2). In 2015, the correlation between protein and oil content remained weakly positive, while the correlations between protein and starch and between oil and starch changed to negative (−0.61 and −0.24, respectively). There were different levels of an inverse relationship between the content of β-glucans and other quality indicators, with the exception of a positive correlation between the content of β-glucans and starch in 2015 (Table 2).
According to published sources [23,29], the amount of carbohydrates, which are the substrate for oil formation, should decrease with an increased protein synthesis. Therefore, the reduction of oil content in the grain can be significant. This explains the direction of correlations between the content of protein and oil and between protein and starch [29], which is confirmed by our correlation data for the dry 2014 and the humid 2015 (Table 2).
B.P. Pleshkov demonstrated that under moisture deficiency, at elevated temperatures, and with high nitrogen content in the soil, the metabolism in plants shifted towards an increase in protein synthesis. Under reverse conditions, the process of carbohydrate and starch synthesis would predominate in plant seeds [23]. This fact was confirmed by the correlations we obtained for 2014 and 2015.
Other researchers found a high positive correlation between the levels of oil and β-glucans in the grain of oat cultivars in different years of cultivation. The authors suggested that oil concentration could be an indirect indicator of the content of β-glucans in the grain, despite the fact that these biochemical components had different accumulation mechanisms [31,43]. We found a negative correlation between these indicators.

2.3. Statistical Processing of the Results Obtained

The biochemical data collected from this work were further statistically processed using the classical discriminant analysis, supplemented by the canonical analysis and identification of canonical variables (Figure 2). The resulting model includes all studied features: protein, oil, starch and dry matter content. The most informative parameter was “protein content” (correlates with canonical axis 1), which makes it possible to differentiate accessions belonging to the A. strigosa species with 100% accuracy. “Oil content” and “starch content” (canonical axis 2) allowed us to differentiate accessions of A. byzantina and A. sativa (45.0 and 78.2% of correct solutions, respectively). “Dry weight” (canonical axis 3) did not affect the distribution of an accession (0% of correct solutions). Accessions of A. abyssinica did not stand out on the basis of this set of observations, occupying an intermediate position.
It was established that the main biochemical parameters of oat accessions were affected by specific assayed species, by the weather conditions in the year of their cultivation, and by the level of breeding improvement among the cultivars in the studied set, associated with the year of entry into the collection and expressed through the VIR catalogue number (individual number of each accession). This confirms the dependence of biochemical parameters both on the species-specific and individual features of the studied genotypes as well as on weather conditions (air temperature, and rainfall). All calculations are presented in Table S5 of the Supplementary Materials.
The interplay between biochemical indicators of grain quality and useful agronomic characters is shown in Table 3.
All characteristics were closely interrelated: the yield of oat grain negatively correlated with the size of the plant organs, which may be explained by an increase in the number of grain husks due to the elongation of the stem and panicle. Grain yield in 2014 positively correlated with 1000 grain weight; the yield in 2015 positively correlated with the number of grains per panicle. Protein content had a negative correlation with 1000 grain weight, number of grains, and yield in 2014, but positively correlated with oat plant height, panicle length, and number of spikelets in 2015. There was a weak negative correlation between oil content and the numbers of spikelets and grains per panicle. Correlations of starch content with other indicators in 2014 and 2015 had opposite dependences. The strongest correlations were found between starch content and number of grains and between starch content and yield.
R. Premkumar et al. [28] revealed an inverse relationship between the height of oat plants and the weight of 1000 grains (−0.295), as in our study, but the relationship was weaker than the one calculated in our experiment (−0.29 in 2014, and −0.69 in 2015). The same authors established a direct relationship between the height of oat plants and the number of grains per panicle (−0.052) [28]. Our research yielded the opposite results (0.44 in 2014, and 0.7 in 2015); we also identified a negative correlation between the number of grains per panicle and the weight of 1000 grains (−0.65 in 2014, and −0.70 in 2015), contrary to the findings of Premkumar et al. (0.633) [28].
Variability of the studied characters in different years was demonstrated using factor analysis; its structure is presented in Table 4 and Figure 3A,B.
In 2014, the first factor determined the linear dimensions of the plant: plant height and panicle length (0.785), and partially, 1000 grain weight (−0.551); the second, 1000 grain weight (0.713), grain yield (0.904), and protein content (−0.719); the third, starch content (0.892). In 2015, the first factor retained its structure, while the second was associated with changes in indicators: grain yield (−0.764), starch content (−0.772), and protein content (0.706). The effect of the third factor on the variability of oat characters in 2015 requires further confirmation.
The correlation structure and factor analysis revealed complex interactions among individual oat characters and a strong effect of the weather conditions in the year of cultivation (Figure 3A,B).
Only A. strigosa and A. abyssinica accessions, due to their low level of ploidy, were clearly isolated, and in 2015, their differentiation was more obvious.
Our statistical analysis also demonstrated a close interplay among all the studied indicators and reliably confirmed the effect of the species, individual features of the cultivar, and the weather specificity in the cultivation area (Russian Northwest) on useful agronomic characters and on nutritional value. These findings allowed for the identification of sources of valuable agronomic traits that can be used to expand the range of feed and food (functional and medicinal) production as well as to develop new high-yielding and highly nutritious oat cultivars adapted to local conditions.
The unevenness of the accession’s set of the current study is obvious. There is a predominance of widespread A. sativa and A. byzantina accessions and a relatively small number of sparsely distributed A. abyssinica and A. strigosa. Such a ratio is due to the insertion of A. abyssinica and A. strigosa accessions in the current experiment as oat forms that are atypical for this region of agricultural production (North-West of the Russian Federation). Thus, our findings regarding A. abyssinica and A. strigosa are largely preliminary. However, our effort made it possible for a larger experiment to include A. abyssinica and A. strigose accessions and to identify A. abyssinica and A. strigose forms valuable for the breeding process, including interspecific crossing.

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Research Materials

The materials for this study were spring oat accessions of various geographic origin (from 11 countries) with useful agronomic traits, recently included into the VIR collection (Table 5 and Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials).
All the studied accessions belong to cultivated oat species: Avena sativa, A. byzantina, A. abyssinica. and A. strigosa, and are represented by covered oat genotypes.
The selected set of oats were grown under the conditions of the Russian Northwest (Pushkin SIB (59°71′ n.l., 30°38′ w.l.), Leningrad region). Sowing operations, observations and harvesting were performed in 2014–2015 according to the guidelines for the study and conservation of the global collection of barley and oats [24] at Pushkin and Pavlovsk Laboratories of VIR. The reference, cv. ‘Privet’ (k-14787), was commercialized and approved for large-scale agricultural production for the northwestern region of the Russian Federation. Sowing time was optimal for this region. The area of the plots was 1 m2. Two plots per accession. The reference cultivar was planted after every 20 plots in the sowing scheme.
The soils in the experimental field were soddy, slightly podzolic sandy loams, with neutral acidity (pH 7.1–7.6). The depth of the humus horizon was up to 23 cm, and the humus content was 2.1–3.0%. The reserve of mobile potassium forms was medium, and that of phosphorus was high. The climate in this agroclimatic zone is moderately warm, and there are cool summers in some years. The warmest month of the year is July, with a mean long-term air temperature of 16.5–17.7 °C. The total number of positive temperatures during the growing period (from seeding stage to harvest) is 2100–2300 °C. The temperatures above 10 °C persist for 105–115 days. The amount of rainfall during the growing season is 550–600 mm/year.
The weather conditions during the years of research differed: the mean temperatures and humidity for June, July and August in 2014 and 2015 are presented in Table S2 of the Supplementary Materials and in Figure 4A,B. As far as rainfall is concerned, 2015 was more humid and less warm.

3.2. Assessment of Useful Agronomic Characters

The field study of each oat cultivar in the context of its useful agronomic characters: plant height (PH), panicle length (LP), number of spikelets (NSP), number of grains (NG), 1000 grain weight (W1000), and grain yield (SP), was carried out in accordance with the guidelines for the study and conservation of the global collection of barley and oats [24] at the stage of full ripeness.

3.3. Biochemical Analysis

Each accession was represented by 50 g of grains mix. Prior to the analysis, the grains of each oat accession were ground into flour using a CM 290 Cemotec laboratory disc mill (FOSS, Sweden). The biochemical analysis was performed at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of VIR applying VIR’s methods [45]. Each analysis was performed in two replications, and the obtained average values were statistically analyzed. Values were expressed in “% dry weight”.
Protein content was measured by the Kjeldahl method: 300 mg of the mixture (in 3–4 repetitions) was mineralized with 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid at 420 °C for 1.5 h. Nitrogen was determined using a Kjeltec 2200 semi-automatic analyzer (FOSS, Hillerød, Denmark) with an automatic distillation unit, followed by titration with a 0.1 N sulfuric acid solution. The total protein content was calculated from the nitrogen content using a factor of 5.7. Oil content was calculated by weighing the dry fat-free residue. The analysis was carried out in a Soxhlet apparatus, with petroleum ether used as a solvent (boiling point 40–70 °C). Starch content was measured by the Ewers polarimetric method. Two grams of the sample were hydrolyzed in 25 mL of 1% hydrochloric acid solution (in 50 mL volumetric flasks) in a boiling water bath (Lauda Hydro H 20 SW, LAUDA, Marlton, NJ, USA) for 15 min, and cooled to room temperature; then, 2.5 mL of phosphotungstic acid was added to precipitate polysaccharides, proteins, etc., and distilled water was added to a volume of 250 mL. The extract after filtering was poured into a polarizing cuvette 10 cm long and the rotation angle was measured on an SAC-I automatic polarimeter/saccharimeter (Atago, Japan, Tokyo). The conversion factor was 181.3. Beta-glucans were determined gravimetrically [46]. To inactivate β-glucanase and remove free sugars, certain lipids, proteins, etc., oatmeal was pretreated with 50% ethanol. The release of β-glucans from the aleurone layer of flour endosperm was carried out with 5% NaOH solution, and the final extraction was performed with 70% ethanol. Beta-glucans floated to the surface in the form of a bundle of fibers, which were then dried at a temperature of 100–102 °C to constant weight and weighed. The content of β-glucans was calculated on the basis of the product’s dry weight (%).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical data processing: correlation analysis, classical discriminant analysis, supplemented by canonical analysis, and identification of canonical variables, factor analysis, was carried out using the Statistica 12.0 software package (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). (2019), STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. www.statsoft.com) (accessed on 2 May 2022).

4. Conclusions

This study has generated a set of findings on different cultivated oat species under the Russian Northwest conditions. The obtained data helped to identify the sources of valuable agronomic traits, which can be used to develop new high-yielding and highly nutritious cultivars adapted to local cultivation conditions. The value of A. strigosa and A. abyssinica accessions in a wide range of traits was also demonstrated for the first time.

Supplementary Materials

The following materials are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11233280/s1: Table S1: List of accessions of Avena L. species from the VIR collection used as research material; Table S2: Weather conditions at Pushkin and Pavlovsk Laboratories of VIR in 2014–2015; Table S3: Protein, oil, starch and β-glucan content (% DW) in the studied Avena L. accessions from the VIR collection during the two-year study, mean values ± SD; Table S4: Plant height, panicle length, number of spikelets, number of grains, 1000 grain weight, and seed productivity (grain yield) in the studied Avena L. accessions from the VIR collection, mean values ± SD; Table S5: Statistical significance of the effect produced by the species that harbors oat accessions, individual characteristics of accessions (VIR catalogue number), year of reproduction, and their combinations on the content of main quality indicators (oil, protein, starch, and β-glucans) in the grain of Avena L. cultivars from the VIR collection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: V.I.K. and T.V.S.; Data curation: E.V.B., V.S.P. and V.I.K.; Formal analysis: L.L.M.; Methodology: V.S.P. and V.I.K.; Investigation: V.S.P. and V.I.K.; Resources: I.G.L. and E.V.B.; Software: L.L.M.; Supervision: I.G.L., A.V.K. and T.V.S.; Validation: V.S.P. and V.I.K.; Visualization: L.L.M.; Writing—original draft preparation: V.S.P. and V.I.K.; Writing—review and editing: I.G.L., A.V.K., T.V.S. and L.L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in accordance with Agreement No. 075-15-2020-911, dated 16 November 2020, with a grant in the form of subsidies from the Federal Budget of the Russian Federation. The grant was provided as a state support for the establishment and development of the World-Class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The study used the material from the VIR’s collection of Avena genetic resources. The authors are grateful for the critical reading of this manuscript by A. Diederichsen, PGRC, Canada.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Urubkov, S.A.; Khovanskaya, S.S.; Dremina, N.V.; Smirnov, S.O. Analysis of the chemical composition and nutritional value of grain raw materials for the production of baby food products. Food Ind. 2018, 8, 16–20. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Lehtinen, P.; Kaukovirta-Norja, A. Oat lipids, enzymes, and quality. In Oats: Chemistry and Technology; Webster, F.H., Wood, P.J., Eds.; AAAC International Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011; pp. 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leonova, S.; Shelenga, T.; Hamberg, M.; Konarev, A.; Loskutov, I.; Carlsson, A. Analysis of oil composition in cultivars and wild species of oat (Avena sp.). Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 7983–7991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loskutov, I.G. Oats: Functional properties and features of use. Bak. Confect. 2016, 3, 17. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Bağcı, A.; Geçgel, Ü.; Özcan, M.M.; Dumlupınar, Z.; Uslu, N. Oil contents and fatty acid composition of oat (Avena sativa L.) seed and oils. J. Agroaliment. Process. Technol. 2019, 25, 181–186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shelenga, T.V.; Kerv, Y.A.; Perchuk, I.N.; Solovyeva, E.A.; Khlestkina, E.K.; Loskutov, G.I.; Konarev, A.V. The potential of small grains crops in enhancing biofortification breeding strategies for human health benefit. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vargach, Y.I.; Mertovishcheva, M.E.; Loskutov, I.G. Antioxidant activity of grain and oat films. Pomic. Small Fruits Cult. Russ. 2016, 47, 57–61. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Özcan, M.M.; Bağcı, A.; Dursun, N.; Gezgin, S.; Hamurcu, M.; Dumlupınar, Z.; Uslu, N. Macro and micro element contents of several oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotype and Variety Grains. Iran. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2017, 36, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bityutskii, N.P.; Yakkonen, K.L.; Loskutov, I.G. Content of iron, zinc and manganese in grains of Triticum aestivum, Secale cereale, Hordeum vulgare and Avena sativa cultivars registered in Russia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abugalieva, A.I.; Loskutov, I.G.; Savin, T.V.; Chudinov, V.A. Evaluation of naked oat accessions from the VIR collection for their qualitative characteristics in Kazakhstan. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breed. 2021, 182, 9–21. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abugalieva, A.I. The content of starch and amylose in the grain of oat varieties of Kazakhstan. Biotechnol. Theory Pract. 2011, 2, 25–31. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Oat Grain Chemical Composition. Available online: http://agro-portal.su/oves/2607-himicheskiy-sostav-zerna-ovsa.html (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  13. Brownlee, I.A. The physiological roles of dietary fiber. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gematdinova, V.M.; Kanarsky, A.V.; Kanarskaya, Z.A.; Smetanskaya, I.I. The effect of alkaline and enzymatic processing of grain on the yield of beta-glucan. Voronezh State Univ. Eng. Technol. Bull. 2017, 79, 164–168. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Loskutov, I.G.; Polonskiy, V.I. Selection for the content of β-glucans in oat grain as a promising direction for obtaining healthy food products, raw materials and forage. Agric. Biol. 2017, 52, 646–657. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shvachko, N.A.; Loskutov, I.G.; Semilet, T.V.; Popov, V.S.; Kovaleva, O.N.; Konarev, A.V. Bioactive components in oat and barley grain as a promising breeding trend for functional food production. Molecules 2021, 26, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gilissen, L.J.W.J.; Meer, I.M.V.; Smulders, M.J.M. Why oats are safe and healthy for celiac disease patients. Med. Sci. 2016, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Loskutov, I.G. Oat (Avena L.). Distribution, Taxonomy, Evolution and Breeding Value; VIR: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2007; p. 336. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  19. Vavilov, N.I. Geographical Variability of Plants; Selected Works in 5 Volumes; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1965; Volume 5. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  20. Merezhko, A.F. A System for the Genetic study of Source Material for Plant Breeding; Methodical Instructions: Leningrad, Russia, 1984; p. 69. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  21. Horeva, V.I.; Shelenga, T.V.; Blinova, E.V.; Konarev, A.V.; Loskutov, I.G. Oats. Biochemical characteristics of samples. In Catalog of the World Collection VIR; VIR: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2018. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Grib, S.I.; Kadyrova, M.A. The relationship of plant height with elements of productivity in barley during breeding for lodging resistance. In Proceedings of the Conference: Increasing the Resistance of Grain Crops to Lodging, Zhodino, Belarus, 15–17 May 1979; pp. 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pleshkov, B.P. Biochemistry of Agricultural Plants, 5th ed.; Agropromizdat: Moscow, Russia, 1987; p. 486. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Loskutov, I.G.; Kovaleva, O.N.; Blinova, E.V. Guidelines for the Study and Conservation of the Global Collection of Barley and Oats; VIR: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2012; p. 63. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodionova, N.F.; Soldatov, V.N.; Merezhko, V.E.; Yarosh, N.P. Cultural Flora. Oats; Kolos: Moscow, Russia, 1994; p. 367. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Eshetie, A.M.; Berhanu, A.W.; Yeshambel, M.C. Evaluation of biomass yield and nutritional quality of oats–vetch mixtures at different harvesting stage under residual moisture in Fogera District, Ethiopia. Agric. Food Secur. 2018, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gebremedhn, B.W.; Alemu, A. Evaluation of different oat varieties for fodder yield and yield related traits in Debre Berhan area, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Develop. 2015, 27, 9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Premkumar, R.; Nirmalakumari; Anandakumar, C.R. Studies on genetic variability and character association among yield and yield attributing traits in oats (Avena sativa L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017, 6, 4075–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seryakova, L.P. Meteorological conditions and plants. In Textbook on Agrometeorology; LGI: Leningrad, Russia, 1971; p. 158. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamm, I. Genetic and environmental variation of grain yield of oat varieties. Agron. Res. 2003, 1, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  31. Polonskiy, V.I.; Surin, N.A.; Gerasimov, S.A.; Lipshin, A.G.; Sumina, A.V.; Zyute, S.A. The study of oat varieties (Avena sativa L.) of various geographical origin for grain quality and productivity. Vavilov J. Genet. Breed. 2019, 23, 683–690. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yarosh, N.P.; Nisova, G.K.; Rodionova, N.A. Variability of biochemical characteristics of sowing oat varieties depending on natural and climatic growing zones. VIR Bull. 1988, 180, 3–9. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Redaelli, R.; Sgrulletta, D.; De Stefanis, E. Genetic variability for chemical components in sixty European oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars. Cereal Res. Commun. 2003, 31, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sykut-Domańska, E.; Rzedzicki, Z.; Nita, Z. Chemical composition variability of naked and husked oat grain (Avena sativa L.). Cereal Res. Commun. 2013, 41, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heneen, W.K.; Banas, A.; Leonova, S.; Carlsson, A.S.; Marttila, S.; Debski, H.; Stymne, S. The distribution of oil in the oat grain. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Welch, R.W. Nutrient composition and nutritional quality of oats and comparisons with other cereals. In Oats: Chemistry and Technology; Webster, F.H., Wood, P.J., Eds.; AAAC International Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011; pp. 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kozlova, G.Y.; Akimova, O.V. Comparative assessment of the bare-grained and filmy oats varieties on main parameters of corn quality. Agric. Biol. 2009, 44, 87–89. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  38. Vargach, Y.I.; Horeva, V.I.; Loskutov, I.G. The content of protein, lipids and starch in grains of naked and hulled forms of oat. Pomic. Small Fruits Cult. Russ. 2017, 51, 67–71. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Yusova, O.A.; Vasyukevich, S.V. Evaluation of oat collection accessions in terms of productivity and biochemical indices under the conditions of the southern forest-steppe of West Siberia. Bull. Altai State Agrar. Univ. 2014, 7, 33–37. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  40. Broeck, H.C.; Londono, D.M.; Timmer, R.; Smulders, M.J.M.; Gilissen, L.J.W.J.; Meer, I.M. Profiling of nutritional and health-related compounds in oat varieties. Foods 2016, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Khoury, D.E.; Cuda, C.; Luhovyy, B.L.; Anderson, G.H. Beta-glucan: Health benefits in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Hindawi Publ. Corp. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hallfrisch, J.; Behall, K.M. Physiological responses of men and women to barley and oat extracts (Nu-trimX). I. Breath hydrogen, methane, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Cereal Chem. 2003, 80, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gerasimov, S.A.; Polonskiy, V.I.; Sumina, A.V.; Surin, N.A.; Lipshin, A.G.; Zyute, S.A. The influence of the genotype and growing conditions of oats on the content of biologically active components in the grain. Chem. Plant Raw Mater. 2020, 2, 65–71. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ermakov, A.I.; Yarosh, N.P. Chemical composition of cotton seeds depending on growing conditions. Bull. Agric. Sci. 1958, 4, 41–45. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  45. Ermakov, A.I.; Arasimovich, V.V. Methods of Biochemical Research of Plants; Agropromizdat: Leningrad, Russia, 1987; p. 430. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  46. Popov, V.S.; Perchuk, I.N.; Khoreva, V.I. Gravimetric method for the quantitative determination of soluble β-glucans in oat grain. Biotechnol. Plant Breed. 2021, 4, 5–12. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Protein (A), oil (B), starch (C) and β-glucan (D) content in Avena L. grain accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Figure 1. Protein (A), oil (B), starch (C) and β-glucan (D) content in Avena L. grain accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Plants 11 03280 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the grain of Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in the space of three canonical axes.
Figure 2. Distribution of the grain of Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in the space of three canonical axes.
Plants 11 03280 g002
Figure 3. Factor structure of the variation of the studied indicators in 2014 (A) and 2015 (B).
Figure 3. Factor structure of the variation of the studied indicators in 2014 (A) and 2015 (B).
Plants 11 03280 g003
Figure 4. Diagrams of weather conditions: air temperature (A) and rainfall (B) in 2014–2015.
Figure 4. Diagrams of weather conditions: air temperature (A) and rainfall (B) in 2014–2015.
Plants 11 03280 g004
Table 1. Average values of protein, starch, oil and β-glucan content in Avena L. grain accessions from the VIR collection, in % DW (dry weight).
Table 1. Average values of protein, starch, oil and β-glucan content in Avena L. grain accessions from the VIR collection, in % DW (dry weight).
Avena spp. Years of StudyNumber of
Entries
ProteinOilStarchβ-Glucans
A. sativa L.20142313.65 ± 1.794.40 ± 0.6935.58 ± 3.173.78 ± 0.83
20152312.20 ± 1.044.64 ± 0.7040.45 ± 3.103.41 ± 0.56
Mean for
2 years
12.924.5238.023.60
A. abyssinica
Hochst.
2014315.58 ± 1.224.45 ± 0.0235.70 ± 1.842.29 ± 0.06
2015315.03 ± 0.175.24 ± 0.1835.26 ± 3.472.63 ± 0.11
Mean for
2 years
15.314.8435.482.46
A. strigosa
Schreb.
2014319.51 ± 0.984.03 ± 0.1641.16 ± 1.673.11 ± 0.91
2015317.78 ± 0.574.14 ± 0.1933.36 ± 1.452.84 ± 0.38
Mean for
2 years
18.654.0937.262.97
A. byzantina Coch.20142014.65 ± 1.924.42 ± 0.7536.36 ± 3.353.46 ± 0.26
20152012.20 ± 1.154.70 ± 0.7938.68 ± 4.483.35 ± 0.58
Mean for
2 years
13.424.5637.523.40
A. sativa L.
(reference)
2014112.51 ± 0.394.91 ± 0.0337.88 ± 0.223.03 ± 0.11
2015111.80 ± 0.284.99 ± 0.0438.90 ± 0.042.87 ± 0.00
Mean for
2 years
12.154.9538.392.95
Table 2. Correlation coefficients among the protein, starch, oil and β-glucan values in the grain of the Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients among the protein, starch, oil and β-glucan values in the grain of the Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
VariableProtein *Oil *Starch *β-Glucans **
20142015201420152014201520142015
Protein *0.080.140.42−0.61−0.53−0.55
Oil *0.080.140.15−0.23−0.38−0.21
Starch *0.42−0.610.15−0.23−0.580.35
β-Glucans **−0.53−0.55−0.38−0.21−0.580.35
* (n-184); ** (n-108).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between useful agronomic characters and biochemical indicators in the grain of Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between useful agronomic characters and biochemical indicators in the grain of Avena L. species accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Indicators PH *LP *NSP *NG *W1000 *SP *Protein **Oil **Starch **
2014
LP *0.57
NSP *0.440.58
NG *0.410.620.61
W1000 *−0.29−0.49−0.65−0.34
SP *0.17−0.03−0.160.240.50
Protein **0.01−0.140.10−0.32−0.35-0.57
Oil **−0.20−0.05−0.28−0.350.05−0.050.08
Starch **0.03−0.18−0.21−0.220.01−0.120.420.15
2015
LP *0.64
NSP *0.700.69
NG *0.390.550.83
W1000 *−0.62−0.75−0.70−0.39
SP *−0.23−0.210.060.410.26
Protein **0.530.430.39−0.07−0.66−0.51
Oil **−0.130.10−0.23−0.20−0.04−0.190.14
Starch **−0.01−0.060.080.320.240.37−0.61−0.23
* useful agronomic characters: PH—plant height, cm; LP—panicle length, cm; NSP—number of spikelets per panicle, pcs; NG—number of grains per panicle, pcs; W1000—1000 grain weight, g; SP—grain yield (seed productivity), g/m2; ** biochemical indicators: protein, oil and starch content.
Table 4. Factor structure for the characters of Avena L. accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Table 4. Factor structure for the characters of Avena L. accessions from the VIR collection in 2014–2015.
Indicators20142015
Factor 1Factor 2Factor 3Factor 1Factor 2
PH *0.7850.1340.3220.8220.084
LP *0.824−0.080−0.0880.8570.076
NSP *0.776−0.371−0.2230.925−0.252
NG *0.8110.162−0.2670.680−0.622
W1000 *−0.5510.7130.038−0.859−0.265
SP *0.1290.904−0.004−0.137−0.764
Protein **−0.108−0.7190.4940.5740.706
Oil **−0.332−0.0540.244−0.1080.437
Starch **−0.094−0.0770.892−0.064−0.772
Factor share33.422.714.842.626.7
* useful agronomic characters: PH—plant height, cm; LP—panicle length, mm; NSP—number of spikelets per panicle, pcs; NG—number of grains per panicle, pcs; W1000—1000 grain weight, g; SP—grain yield (seed productivity), g/m2; ** biochemical indicators: protein, oil and starch content.
Table 5. List of accessions of cultivated Avena L. species from the VIR collection used as the research material.
Table 5. List of accessions of cultivated Avena L. species from the VIR collection used as the research material.
Avena L. spp.PloidyOriginQuantity
A. sativa L.2 n = 42Russia, Brazil, Germany, Belarus, USA23
A. byzantina Coch.2 n = 42Finland, Ukraine, Great Britain, Portugal, USA, Kazakhstan, Germany, Brazil, Ethiopia, Russia20
A. abyssinica Hochst.2 n = 28Ethiopia3
A. strigosa Schreb.2 n = 14Brazil3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popov, V.S.; Khoreva, V.I.; Konarev, A.V.; Shelenga, T.V.; Blinova, E.V.; Malyshev, L.L.; Loskutov, I.G. Evaluating Germplasm of Cultivated Oat Species from the VIR Collection under the Russian Northwest Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233280

AMA Style

Popov VS, Khoreva VI, Konarev AV, Shelenga TV, Blinova EV, Malyshev LL, Loskutov IG. Evaluating Germplasm of Cultivated Oat Species from the VIR Collection under the Russian Northwest Conditions. Plants. 2022; 11(23):3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popov, Vitaliy S., Valentina I. Khoreva, Alexei V. Konarev, Tatyana V. Shelenga, Elena V. Blinova, Leonid L. Malyshev, and Igor G. Loskutov. 2022. "Evaluating Germplasm of Cultivated Oat Species from the VIR Collection under the Russian Northwest Conditions" Plants 11, no. 23: 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop