Next Article in Journal
Biocontrol Potential of PeBL2, a Novel Entomopathogenic Bacterium from Brevibacillus laterosporus A60, Induces Systemic Resistance against Rice Leaf Folder Cnaphalocrocis exigua (Butler) in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Association between the Classification of the Genus of Batrachospermaceae (Rhodophyta) and the Environmental Factors Based on Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Traditional Knowledge, Phytochemistry, and Biological Properties of Vachellia tortilis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ulosarcina terrestrica gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Ulvophycean Sarcinoid Alga from the Russian Far East
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Diversity and Ecology of Lobophora Species Associated with Coral Reef Systems in the Western Gulf of Thailand, including the Description of Two New Species

Plants 2022, 11(23), 3349; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233349
by Anirut Klomjit 1, Christophe Vieira 2, Felipe M. G. Mattos 1,3, Makamas Sutthacheep 1, Suttikarn Sutti 4, Myung-Sook Kim 2 and Thamasak Yeemin 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Plants 2022, 11(23), 3349; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233349
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 19 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 2 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity and Taxonomy of Algae)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The reviewed paper dedicated to study the biodiversity and ecology of the Lobophora species from the western Gulf of Thailand with the description of several new species. This data is very interesting and important for phycology. In the study, the morphological, molecular-genetic and ecological methods were used. Conclusions are supported by results and discussion. The manuscript is well illustrated and  clear.

I can recommend the MS for publication in journal “Plants” after correction some mistakes.

Lines 12-30 and further in the MS: Latin names should be italicized.

Line 23: Remove the extra dot after the words “sp. nov.”

Lines 61-62: I think, that you can delete the numbers 1 and 2 from this sentence.  

Line 67: At the beginning of the paragraph an indent is required.

I do not understand why you are describing new species in Table 2. It is better to do this in the main text of the paper.

 

Lines 262-270, 273-282: Delete this information.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer1

I already improved my manuscript following your comments. 

Your sincerely,

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript "Diversity and ecology of Lobophora species associated to coral reef systems in the western Gulf of Thailand" is very interesting.

General comments:
Authors investigated the diversity of Lobophora in the western Gulf of Thailand using morphological and molecular data, as well as their interactions with scleractinian corals.
Authors analysed 36 Lobophora specimens from 15 sites in the western Gulf of Thailand. They used molecular and morphological observations.
Description of Statistical analyses is very poor and needs correction. Lack information about distribution of observed traits. "hierarchical cluster analysis": What method? ANOVA? Interactions? Relationships?

Detailed comments:
The brown macroalgal genus Lobophora plays important ecological roles in many marine ecosystems. This group received much attention over the past decade, and a considerable number of new species were identified globally.
Introduction is perfect.


My suggestion:
Line 12: Lobophora - italic.
Lines 22-24: "L. chumphonensis", "L. thailandensis", "L. lamourouxii", "L. obscura" and "L. obscura" - italic.
Table 1 needs LSD or HSD values and homogeneous groups.
Table 1 needs coefficients of variation for particular characteristics.
Lines 123-137 "2.3. Interactions between Lobophora and corals": How analysed?
Lines 238-241: description of Statistical analyses is very poor and needs correction. Lack information about distribution of observed traits. "hierarchical cluster analysis": What method? ANOVA? Interactions? Relationships?


Paper needs major revision.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer2

Thank you for your suggestion esspecially for statistic description. We improved some writing and data as your recommendation see in Response to Reviewer file. Moreover, we added some supplymentary files to support the data in revised manuscript. 

Your sincerely,
Anirut Klomjit


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Now, all is ok.

Back to TopTop