Next Article in Journal
Agathis robusta Bark Essential Oil Effectiveness against COVID-19: Chemical Composition, In Silico and In Vitro Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizosphere Microbiome as Alternative Biofertilizer in Boosting Solanum melongena L. Adaptation to Salinity Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/plants11050662
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of the Banana WRKY Transcription Factor Gene Family Closely Related to Fruit Ripening and Stress

by
Caihong Jia
1,2,
Zhuo Wang
2,3,
Jingyi Wang
2,
Hongxia Miao
2,3,
Jianbin Zhang
2,
Biyu Xu
2,
Juhua Liu
2,3,*,
Zhiqiang Jin
2,* and
Jihong Liu
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
3
Hainan Key Laboratory for Protection and Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, Hainan Academy of Tropical Agricultural Resource, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571101, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(5), 662; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050662
Submission received: 5 January 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 28 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
WRKY transcription factors (TFs) play an important role in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress as well as in plant growth and development. In the present study, bioinformatics methods were used to identify members of the WRKY transcription factor family in the Musa acuminata (DH-Pahang) genome (version 2). A total of 164 MaWRKYs were identified and phylogenetic analysis showed that MaWRKYs could be categorized into three subfamilies. Overall, the 162 MaWRKYs were distributed on 11 chromosomes, and 2 genes were not located on the chromosome. There were 31 collinear genes from segmental duplication and 7 pairs of genes from tandem duplication. RNA-sequencing was used to analyze the expression profiles of MaWRKYs in different fruit development, ripening stages, under various abiotic and biotic stressors. Most of the MaWRKYs showed a variety of expression patterns in the banana fruit development and ripening stages. Some MaWRKYs responded to abiotic stress, such as low temperature, drought, and salt stress. Most differentially expressed MaWRKYs were downregulated during banana’s response to Foc TR4 infection, which plays an important role in physiological regulation to stress. Our findings indicate that MaWRKY21 directly binds to the W-box of the MaICS promoter to decrease MaICS transcription and then reduce the enzyme activity. These studies have improved our understanding of the molecular basis for the development and stress resistance of an important banana variety.

1. Introduction

WRKY transcription factors (TFs) are one of the largest families in plants and form integral parts of signaling webs that modulate many plant processes [1]. There are one or two conserved domains with a length of 60 amino acid residues in the amino acid sequence of WRKY transcription factors, which includes an N-terminal DNA binding motif and a C-terminal zinc finger motif. Plant WRKY transcription factors can be divided into three categories: the first family contains two WRKY domains and two zinc finger structures with C2H2; the second family contains only one WRKY domain and the zinc finger structure is C2H2; and the third family contains one WRKY domain and the zinc finger structure is C2HC [2]. The amino acid sequence of the zinc finger motif is CX4–5CX22–23HXH (C is cysteine, X is any amino acid, X4–5 is any 4–5 amino acid, X22–23 is any 22–23 amino acid, and H is histidine) or CX7CX23HXC (X7 is any 7 amino acid and X23 is any 23 amino acid).
In 1994, the first WRKY gene was identified from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam), and its coding protein was named the SPF1 protein [3]. With the completion of plant genome sequencing, more and more WRKY gene families have been identified at the whole genome level, such as in apple [4], lily [5], Ricinus communis [6], carrot [7], and cotton [8]. A large number of studies have shown that WRKY TFs play a key role in plant defense, including against bacteria [9] and fungi [10]. WRKY accumulation factors are also involved in various abiotic stressors. The expression of some WRKY transcription factors is strongly induced under abiotic stress, such as salinity, drought, low temperature, and hormone stress [11]. WRKY transcription factors play an important role in plant hormone mediated signal transduction [12,13,14,15]. Salicylic acid is one of the five hormones, and previous studies found that it is involved in the process of banana resistance to Foc TR4 [16]. In other plants, WRKY TF has been shown to regulate disease resistance by regulating salicylic acid key enzyme genes or genes in the salicylic acid signal pathway. For example, in rice, OsWRKY6 directly activates OsICS1 and regulates the defense response of rice to bacterial blight [17]. In Arabidopsis protoplasts, WRKY28 can bind to ICS1 promoter and activates ICS1 expression [18]. AtNAC019, AtNAC055 and AtNAC072 can repress the expression of AtICS1 through direct interaction with its promoter [19]. AtTCP proteins activate AtICS1 expression through direct interaction with its promoter during pathogen infection [20].
Banana (Musa. spp.) is a fruit product with remarkable economic benefits in the market at home and abroad, and production contributes to many people’s income [21]. The Brazilian banana (M. acuminata) is a triploid (AAA) banana cultivar. However, in the process of planting, bananas are often blocked by abiotic and biotic stress, such as drought [22], low temperature [23], salt [24], and several devastating diseases [25]. Banana Fusarium Wilt is one of the most important diseases of banana and one of the most serious plant diseases in the world and is caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (Foc). Foc tropical race 4 (Foc TR4) is a disease that is destructive to the development of the banana industry [26]. M. acuminata (A genome) [27] and M. balbisiana (B genome) [28] are the main parents of edible banana and have been sequenced. Thus far, although there are two reports focused on the WRKY gene family, these data are based on version 1 of the M. acuminata genome [29,30]. In 2016, the M. acuminata genome reference was improved by a combination of methods and datasets. Compared with version 1 of the M. acuminata genome, the assembly of the genome sequence and gene annotation has changed greatly in version 2 [31]. Until now, no systematic information has been available regarding the WRKY family in version 2 of the M. cuminate genome. The WRKY family has been associated with plant senescence, organ development, and stress tolerance in many plants. In this study, we systematically analyzed the WRKY gene family based on version 2 of the M. acuminata genome to understand its potential relevance to fruit ripening and stress tolerance and demonstrated that MaWRKY21 can directly bind to the W-box of the MaICS promoter to decrease MaICS transcription and, in turn, enzyme activity. This new comprehensive study can improve our understanding of MaWRKYs-related fruit development, ripening processes, and stress responses and can establish a base for future studies of genetic improvement in banana.

2. Results

2.1. Identification Analysis of MaWRKYs

A total of 164 sequences were identified as putative members of the MaWRKY gene family. The 164 predicted MaWRKY proteins ranged from 114 (MaWRKY153) to 828 (MaWRKY74) amino acid residues with a relative molecular mass varying from 13.56 (MaWRKY153) to 90.05 kDa (MaWRKY74), and the theoretical isoelectric points (PIs) were predicted to range from 4.80 (MaWRKY142) to 10.16 (MaWRKY17) (Table S1).

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of MaWRKYs

To analyze the evolutionary relationships among MaWRKYs, 164 MaWRKY proteins were aligned with AtWRKY proteins from Arabidopsis and OsWRKY proteins from rice, and an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA7. WRKY conservative domains can be divided into three categories: I, II, and III, according to Eulgem [2]. Among them, group I contains two WRKY domains and groups II and III contain one WRKY domain; groups I and II have a C2H2 type zinc finger domain and group III has a C2HC domain. There are 23 members in group I, 113 members in group II, and 28 members in group III. According to the classification in Arabidopsis, group II was further classified into subclasses IIa (11), IIb (23), IIc (33), IId (9), and IIe (29) (Figure 1).

2.3. Chromosome Location and Repeat Sequence of MaWRKYs

Overall, 162 MaWRKYs were found to be distributed on 11 chromosomes using genome chromosomal location analyses (Figure 2), and the number of MaWRKYs was different across chromosomes. Among them, there were 24 on chromosome 7, 23 on chromosome 4, and 22 on chromosome 6. There were at least 7 on chromosome 11, 8 on chromosomes 1 and 2, 12 on chromosomes 8 and 9, 16 on chromosomes 3 and 10, and 14 on chromosome 5. Gene duplication is an important source of new gene generation and function evolution. Gene duplication can be divided into two categories: tandem duplication refers to duplication events in which duplication genes are located on the same chromosome, and there are no other genes between them. Duplication events with duplication genes located on different chromosomes or at a relatively distant position on the same chromosome are called segmental duplications. In the M. acuminata genome, 12 conserved collinear blocks were found [27]. We found that 71 genes were located in 12 collinear blocks and there were 31 group sets of segmental duplication and 7 pairs of gene tandem duplication (Figure 2 and Table S2).

2.4. Sequence Analysis of the Conserved Domain MaWRKY Proteins

All 164 MaWRKY protein sequences were found to contain WRKY domain using CD-Search in NCBI and ClustalW align. The longest conserved domain was composed of 828 amino acids. The domain of MaWRKYs was found to be highly conserved with occasional variants (Figure 3). Among them, the C-terminal WRKY heptapeptide domain and zinc finger structure of class I were WRKYGQK and CX4CX23HXH, and the N-terminal WRKY heptapeptide domain and zinc finger structure were WRKYGQK and CX4CX22HXH, which was more similar to the C-segment zinc finger. In class II subclasses a, b, c, d, and e, the WRKY heptapeptide domain and zinc finger structure were WRKYGQK and CX5CX23HXH (except for MaWRKY117, in which the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WRKYGEK). The structure of class IIc heptapeptide domain and zinc finger was WRKYGQK and CX4CX23HXH (except for MaWRKY25, MaWRKY98, and MaWRKY109, in which the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WRKYGKK; in MaWRKY40, the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WRKYGRK; in MaWRKY53 and MaWRKY94, the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WNKYGRK). In class III, the heptapeptide domain and zinc finger structure were WRKYGQK and CX7CX23HXC (except for MaWRKY41, in which the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WRKYGHK; in MaWRKY4, MaWRKY5, MaWRKY6, and MaWRKY7, the WRKY heptapeptide domain was WRKYGEK).

2.5. Analysis of the Expression Profile of MaWRKYs in Different Development and Postharvest Ripening Stages of Banana Fruit

To evaluate the expression characteristics of MaWRKYs, RNA-Seq data were obtained from the fruit development and ripening stages (Table S3). Among the 164 MaWRKYs, 42 and 38 showed high expression levels at 0 days after flowering (DAF) and 20 DAF (RPKM > 5), accounting for 25.6 and 23.2% of the total genes, respectively, and 24, 27, and 23 MaWRKYs were highly expressed at 80 DAF, and 8 and 14 days postharvest (DPH) (RPKM > 5), accounting for 14.6, 16.5, and 14.0% of the total genes, respectively (Figure 4 and Table S4). Among them, MaWRKY3, MaWRKY70, MaWRKY119, MaWRKY133, MaWRKY137, MaWRKY140, MaWRKY144, and MaWRKY163 were highly constitutively expressed at 0, 20, and 80 DAF and 8 and 14 DPH (Figure 4 and Table S4), indicating that these genes play regulatory roles during fruit development and postharvest ripening stages.

2.6. Expression Profile Analysis of MaWRKYs under Abiotic Stress and Foc TR4 Treatment

RNA-Seq data were used to analyze the expression profiles of MaWRKYs; these data were obtained from banana plantlets in response to osmotic, salt, cold, and Foc TR4 treatments (Table S3). We deleted genes with RPKM values less than 5 to present the differentially expressed genes intuitively and accurately. The cold treatment (4 °C) resulted in 39 MaWRKYs being differentially expressed (log2 Ratio Cold/Control > 1), of which 38 were upregulated and one was downregulated (Figure 5 and Table S5). Drought treatment (200 mM mannitol) resulted in 28 MaWRKYs being differentially expressed (log2 Ratio Osmotic/Control > 1), of which 27 were upregulated and one was downregulated (Figure 5 and Table S6). Salt treatment (300 mM NaCl) resulted in 33 MaWRKYs being differentially expressed (log2 Ratio Salt/Control > 1), and all were upregulated (Figure 5 and Table S7). Under abiotic stress, 10 genes (MaWRKY15, MaWRKY16, MaWRKY43, MaWRKY76, MaWRKY98, MaWRKY100, MaWRKY105, MaWRKY106, MaWRKY117, and MaWRKY152) responded to 3 abiotic stressors at the same time, 15 genes responded to cold and salt stress, 5 genes responded to cold and drought stresses, and 4 genes responded to osmotic and salt stress (Figure 6). These results indicate that WRKY genes are mainly involved positively in banana’s response to abiotic stress.
Foc TR4 treatment resulted in the differential expression of 53 MaWRKYs (log2 Ratio 2 DPI/0 DPI > 1), 1 that was upregulated and 52 that were downregulated (Figure 5 and Table S8). The results show that these 53 differentially expressed MaWRKYs may play a role in the interaction between banana and Foc TR4.

2.7. Expression Patterns of MaWRKYs during the Interaction between Banana and Foc TR4

Nine differentially expressed MaWRKYs (MaWRKY8, MaWRKY21, MaWRKY43, MaWRKY75, MaWRKY95, MaWRKY101, MaWRKY112, MaWRKY141, and MaWRKY164) were selected to analyze their expression patterns in Brazilian banana to Foc TR4 infection by quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR. The roots of banana plantlets without Foc TR4 treatment were used as a control. RNA was extracted from the roots of Brazilian banana at 2, 4, and 6 DPI (days postinfection) and in the control. In the Brazilian banana, the expression levels of nine MaWRKYs were decreased at 2, 4, and 6 DPI. We found that nine MaWRKYs displayed the same characteristics between the RNA-Seq data and qRT-PCR data at 0 and 2 DPI (Figure 7). These results indicate that these genes are involved in the interaction between plantain and Foc TR4.

2.8. Interaction Network of MaWRKY21

Owing to the lowest expression level of MaWRKY21 in response to Foc TR4, we selected it to construct a co-expression network to further explore the regulatory network using Cytoscape [32,33]. In total, 106 interactive proteins for MaWRKY21 were detected (Figure 8 and Table S10). The 106 key proteins that interacted with MaWRKY21 were divided into 36 classes, including the most abundant TF family AP2/EREBP (22), followed by POD (peroxidase) (8), MYB (Myb-related protein) (5), ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase) (5), WRKY33 (5), E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (5), WRKY22 (4), RAV-like factor (4), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) (3), JAZ1 (jasmonate ZIM domain-containing protein) (3), CML (calcium-binding protein CML) (3), COMT (caffeic acid O-methyltransferase) (3), ERF (ethylene-responsive transcription factor) (3), NAC (3), TGA (2), PBR1 (calcium-binding protein PBP1) (2), MYC2 (2), 4CL (4-coumarate-CoA ligase) (2), GST (glutathione S-transferase) (2), P450 (2), bHLH (2) with single-member for ICS (isochorismate synthase), DOF4.6 (dof zinc finger protein DOF4.6-like), DELLA protein, NCED3, ARG7 (indole-3-acetic acid-induced protein ARG7-like), CBF, FLS2 (LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase FLS2), GID1 (gibberellin receptor), MaWRKY125, MaWRKY71, MaWRKY161, LOB, TIFY 5A, PR4 (pathogenesis-related protein 4), and PR1 (pathogenesis-related protein 1). The results indicate that these proteins, together with MaWRKY21, may play a role in the response of banana to Foc TR4 infection.

2.9. Binding of MaWRKY21 to the MaICS Promoter

Previous studies found that salicylic acid is involved in the process of banana resistance to Foc TR4 [16]. Isochorismate synthase is one of the key enzymes in salicylic acid biosynthesis and the rate limiting enzyme in salicylic acid biosynthesis [34]. Therefore, MaICS was selected for yeast one hybrid verification, which was associated in the co-expression network. The 1692 bp upstream sequence of MaICS was isolated from banana genomic DNA according to the banana M. acuminata genome, and the 1692 bp main regulatory elements of the MaICS promoter were predicted online by plantcare websit. We found that there was a conserved W-box element bounding to WRKY TF in the MaICS promoter sequence. The MaICS promoter was cloned into the pAbAi vector, generating pAbAi-MaICSp. MaWRKY21 was cloned into the pGADT7-AD vector, generating pGADT7-MaWRKY21 (Figure 9A). The yeast one hytrid (Y1H) Gold yeast co-transformed with pAbAi-MaICSp and pGADT7-MaWRKY21 could grow normally on the SD/-Leu medium containing 300 ng/L AbA, whereas the pAbAi-MaICSp and pGADT7-AD could not grow (Figure 9B), which proved that MaWRKY21 can directly bind to the sequence of the MaICS promoter.

2.10. Transcriptional Regulation of MaWRKY21 on MaICS

The date above showed that MaWRKY21 can bind to the MaICS promoter, but it remains to be determined whether it is an activator or a repressor. Therefore, we used the dual luciferase (LUC) assay to investigate how MaWRKY21 interacts with the MaICS promoter. The reporter vector (MaICSp:LUC) and effector (MaWRKY21) were co-infected in tobacco leaves epidermal cells by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and the relative LUC activity was determined. The results showed that, compared with the control (empty load of reporter gene and effector gene), the fluorescence of LUC decreased significantly, indicating that MaWRKY21 may function as a transcriptional repressor. (Figure 10A, B). We further used the GUS reporting system to study how MaWRKY21 interacts with the MaICS promoter. The PBI121 empty vector and PBI121-MaICS vector were transformed into banana fruit slices, MaWRKY21 and the PBI121-MaICS were co-transformed in banana fruit slices. β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining and activity assays showed that GUS activities were lower in the banana fruits slices with MaWRKY21 + PBI121-MaICS than in slices infected with PBI121 and PBI121-MaICS. The results showed that MaWRKY21 may negatively regulate the expression of MaICS (Figure 10C, D). These results of the GUS staining system and double luciferase activity showed that MaWRKY21 could inhibit the expression of MaICS.

3. Discussion

WRKY TFs play pivotal regulator roles in plant growth, development, and response to a variety of abiotic and biotic stressors [35]. The WRKY gene family in plants is large. There are 72 WRKYs in Arabidopsis, 96 in rice, 55 in cucumber, and 197 in soybean. In previous research reports, 153 WRKY genes were identified in banana with reference to the first version of the M. acuminata genome and 6 genes were not located on a chromosome [29]. In total, 147 WRKY genes were identified in banana with reference to the first version of the M. acuminata genome and 6 genes were not located on a chromosome [30]. Based on the second version of the M. acuminata genome, we identified 164 WRKY genes and 2 genes that were not located on a chromosome. In our study, there were 11 and 17 more genes than in the original report. Three genes assembled on the first version of the M. acuminata genome do not appear in the second version (GSMUA_Achr4G14270_001, GSMUA_Achr6G03810_001, and GSMUA_Achr10G02060_001). In the first version of the M. acuminata genome, four genes were not located on any chromosome, while in the second version of the M. acuminata genome, they were located on the chromosome (for example: GSMUA_AchrUn_randomG17570_001 is located on the second chromosome reference to the second version of the M. acuminata genome and named Ma02_g00790). The first version of the M. acuminata genome was compared with the second version of the M. acuminata genome, the chromosomal localization of seven genes was changed (for example: GSMUA_Achr1G04770_001 is located on the fourth chromosome reference to the second version of the M. acuminata genome and named Ma04_g24540) (Table S11). The results showed that with the development of bioinformatics, the second version of the banana M. acuminata genome was assembled more accurately. The quality of genome assembly is an important factor affecting the number of genes.
Resistant (Karthobiumthum (ABB) (NRCB-0050)) and susceptible (Nendran (AAB) (NRCB-0615)) varieties were inoculated with a nematode; the expression profile of the MaWRKY family was analyzed using transcriptome data, and six genes were verified by fluorescence quantitative PCR [29]. Goel [30] analyzed the expression profile of the MaWRKY family with reference to the published transcriptome data (fruit transcriptome datasets of M. acuminata; dwarf Cavendish; root transcriptome datasets of Brazilian), and the expression of five genes was analyzed in fruit development, maturity, and in different organs of dessert (M. acuminata) and cooking (M. paradisiaca) varieties using fluorescence quantitative PCR. In our study, we analyzed the transcriptome of the fruit development stage, and seedlings under cold stress, salt stress, drought stress, and Foc TR4 stress in Brazilian banana. Additionally, the expression of nine MaWRKYs was analyzed after Brazilian banana was stressed by Foc TR4. Our results enrich the understanding of the WRKY family in bananas.
WRKY is a class of plant-specific TFs which typically contains 1–2 WRKY domains composed of about 60 highly conserved amino acids. This domain contains a highly conserved core sequence of WRKYGQK at the N-terminal and a variable zinc finger structure at the C-terminal [29]. It regulates gene expression by specifically binding to the W-box in the promoter region of the target gene. We found that 164 MaWRKY proteins contained at least one conservative WRKY domain. In Caragana intermedia, the seven amino acids of WRKYGQK in the WRKY TF were mutated [36]. In our study, we also found that MaWRKY53 and MaWRKY94 had a mutated amino acid sequence, and the WRKY motif changed to WNKY. In the GQK motif, 12 genes changed to GEK (MaWRKY4, MaWRKY5, MaWRKY6, MaWRKY7, and MaWRKY117), GKK (MaWRKY25, MaWRKY98, MaWRKY109, and MaWRKY126), GHK (MaWRKY41 and MaWRKY113), and GRK (MaWRKY40). In soybean, GmWRKY6 and GmWRKY21 contained the WRKYGKK motif and could not normally bind to the W-box [37]. In tobacco, NtWRKY12 has the WRKYGQK motif, and can bind specifically to the sequence TTTTCCAC instead of the normal W-box [38]. We presumed that the variation in the WRKYGQK motif could lead to a significant decrease or even complete loss of binding ability to the W-box, or that it could bind to other new motifs and generate new functions.
Gene duplication events play an important role in the amplification and evolution of plant gene families [39]. The M. acuminata genome of banana has experienced three genome-wide duplication (WGD) events (α-, β-, and γ-WGD), which led to duplicated segments included in the Musa ancestral blocks, covering 222 Mb and containing 26,829 genes [27]. There are many homologous genes of banana WRKYs in each sub-branch, which indicates that the banana genome retained more homologous genes in the process of diploidization after WGD. In Arabidopsis [40], carrot [7], peanut [41], and tomato [42], WRKY gene expansion occurs mainly by tandem duplication. In our study, 30.5% (50/164) of MaWRKYs were located in collinear regions (Figure 2 and Table S2), which indicated that the expansion of banana WRKYs was caused by segmental duplication.
WRKY TFs are involved in fruit development and ripening. In watermelon, 33% of CLWRKY were expressed in fruit, and some of them were positively or negatively involved in regulatory pathways of plant hormones, thus playing important roles in plant growth, development, and defense against environmental stress [43]. In banana, analysis of the mature and immature fruits by transcriptome sequencing showed that some MaWRKYs were highly expressed in mature fruits, while some MaWRKYs were lowly expressed during fruit ripening, indicating that MaWRKYs had different roles in fruit development and ripening [44]. In our results, 50% of the MaWRKYs were highly expressed in fruit ripening (Figure 4), indicating that MaWRKYs played important roles in fruit ripening.
WRKYs are involved in the plant response to abiotic and biotic stress [45]. Overexpression of CsWRKY46 from cucumber in Arabidopsis enhanced the cold resistance of transgenic lines and increased the expression of cold related genes RD29A and COR47, showing that CsWRKY46 played a role in cold stress resistance in cucumber [46]. In tobacco, overexpression of cotton GhWRKY25 reduced tolerance to drought and increased salt tolerance [47]. Overexpression of DgWRKY1 or DgWRKY3 from Dendranthema grandiflorum in tobacco enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic lines [48]. MaWRKY31, MaWRKY33, MaWRKY60, and MaWRKY71 can directly bind to the W-box elements of the promoters of MaNCED1 and MaNCED2 genes and activate their expression, which can enhance the cold tolerance of banana fruit by increasing the content of endogenous ABA (abscisic acid) [49]. In our studies, we found that more than 17.1% of MaWRKYs were differentially expressed under cold, drought, and salt stress, and 10 genes (MaWRKY15, MaWRKY16, MaWRKY43, MaWRKY76, MaWRKY98, MaWRKY100, MaWRKY105, MaWRKY106, MaWRKY117, and MaWRKY152) responded to three abiotic stressors at the same time (Figure 6). These results indicate that MaWRKYs play important roles in banana’s response to drought, high salinity, and low temperature.
The WRKY family also plays an important role in plant disease resistance. In banana, MaNAC5 interacted with MaWRKYs to enhance the expression of pathogenesis-related genes against Colletotrichum musae [50]. Overexpression of GhWRKY39-1 enhanced the resistance of transgenic tobacco to the bacterial pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani [51]. In Arabidopsis, overexpression of wild grape WRKY transcription factor VqWRKY52 enhanced the resistance of transgenic Arabidopsis to the nutritional pathogen powdery mildew [52]. We found that 53 MaWRKYs were differentially expressed after inoculation with Foc TR4, and 52 genes were downregulated and only 1 gene was upregulated (Figure 5 and Table S8). qRT-PCR results suggested that MaWRKY8, MaWRKY21, MaWRKY43, MaWRKY75, MaWRKY95, MaWRKY101, MaWRKY112, MaWRKY141, and MaWRKY164 were decreased at 2, 4, and 6 DPI. The results showed that these genes were involved in the interaction between plantain and Foc TR4.
In this study, the co-expression network of MaWRKY21 is associated with MaICS, which is the key gene of salicylate synthase, implying that MaWRKY21 might be responsible for the expression of MaICS in the biosynthesis of salicylic acid. Before our laboratory analyzed the expression of MaICS in resistant and susceptible varieties, the results showed that salicylic acid played a role in the interaction between banana and Foc TR4 [16]. However, there is no study about the regulation mechanism of MaICS in banana, so we selected the gene to study whether MaWRKY21 has a regulatory effect on it. The results showed that MaWRKY21 can bind with the promoter of MaICS and negatively regulate the expression of MaICS (Figure 9 and Figure 10). In other plants, the regulatory mechanism of ICS has been reported. In Arabidopsis protoplasts, WRKY28 can bind to the ICS1 promoter and activate ICS1 expression [18]. AtNAC019, AtNAC055, and AtNAC072 can repress the expression of AtICS1 through direct interaction with its promoter [19]. AtTCP proteins activate AtICS1 expression through direct interaction with its promoter during pathogen infection [20]. In rice, OsWRKY6 directly activates OsICS1 and regulates the defense response of rice to bacterial blight [17]. These results showed that the regulatory mechanism of ICS is very complex, there may be many factors regulating it in the same plant. In this study, we demonstrated that MaWRKY21 can regulate the expression of MaICS. As there is a complex coordinated regulatory mechanism underlying ICS expression, there may be other proteins regulating the expression of MaICS in banana.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of WRKY Family Genes in Banana

Whole protein sequences of the M. acuminata genome (DH-Phang) were obtained from the banana genome database (http://banana-genome.cirad.fr/). Subsequently, the iTAK program (http://itak.feilab.net/cgi-bin/itak/index.cgi, accessed on 9 October 2020) was used to identify TFs according to the consensus rules, which are mainly summarized within PlnTFDB and PlantTFDB [53,54], and obtained all candidate MaWRKY protein sequences. Finally, all candidate MaWRKY protein sequences were further evaluated using BLASTp and CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 2 November 2020) databases in NCBI. Fifty-three WRKY protein sequences of Arabidopsis and 95 WRKY protein sequences of rice were obtained from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 5 November 2020) and RGAP (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/, accessed on 5 November 2020) databases.
The WRKY protein sequences of banana, Arabidopsis, and rice were aligned using Clustal X2.0, the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstraps. Repeat sequences of WRKY were analyzed by Circos (http://circos.ca/, accessed on 5 November 2020). The molecular weight and isoelectric points of MaWRKYs were predicted from the ExPASy database (http://expasy.org/, accessed on 8 November 2020) (Table S1). The sequence logo for the WRKY domain was constructed by the WebLogo server (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi, accessed on 2 February 2022).

4.2. Chromosome Localization and Gene Duplications

To resolve the physical localizations of MaWRKYs, the beginning and terminative positions of all MaWRKYs on each chromosome were obtained from the banana M. acuminata genome database. The image of the locations of the banana WRKY genes was drawn using MapInspect software (http://mapinspect.software.informer.com/, accessed on 10 December 2020). Tandem and segmental duplications were determined according to the plant genome duplication database [55]. Syntenic blocks were discovered using MCSCAN [28]. The image of locations and synteny of the MaWRKYs was drawn using Circos (0.63) software.

4.3. Plant Materials and Treatments

The banana fruits were obtained from the Banana Plantation of the Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology (Chengmai, Hainan, 20 N, 110 E). To analyze expression at the developmental and mature stages of banana fruit, developing banana fruits at 0, 20, and 80 DAF were collected from BX banana, representing fruit developmental stages of budding, cutting flowers, and harvest stages, respectively. To analyze the expression of MaWRKYs during the postharvest ripening processes, fruits at 8 (more green than yellow) and 14 (full yellow) DPH (days postharvest) in BX were collected and used for postharvest analyses.
One-month-old banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Brazilian) plantlets were grown in Hoagland’s solution [56] under greenhouse conditions with 70% relative humidity and at 28 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark cycle. For salt treatment, 15 banana plantlets at the five-leaf stage were irrigated with 300 mM NaCl for 7 days. For osmotic treatment, 15 banana plantlets at the five-leaf stage were irrigated with 200 mM mannitol for 7 days. For cold treatment, 15 banana plantlets at the five-leaf stage were incubated at 4 °C for 22 h. Leaves without major veins were harvested for analysis. For Foc TR4 treatment, 15 banana plantlets at the five-leaf stage roots were incubated in a Foc TR4 spore suspension of 1.5 × 106 condia/mL, the entire root system was harvested at 0, 2, 4, and 6 DPI. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction transcriptome sequencing and gene expression analysis.

4.4. Transcriptome Analysis

Total RNA was extracted using RNA extraction kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and converted into cDNA using a cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Beijing, China). The TruSeq RNA library preparation kit v2 was used to construct the cDNA library, then it was sequenced on the IIIumina HiSeq 2000 platform (San Diego, CA, USA) using the IIIumina RNA-Seq protocol. Three biological replicates were used for each sample. Reads per kilobases of exon model per million reads (RPKM) were considered as gene expression levels [57]. Differentially expressed genes were evaluated with DEGseq [58]. A heat map was created with MeV 4.9 and Java Treeview software according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All RNA-Seq data were deposited in the CNSA (https://db.cngb.org/cnsa/, accessed on 6 September 2019) of CNGBdb [26].

4.5. qRT-PCR

According to the manufacturer’s protocol (Fermentas, Beijing, China), 1 μg RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the first-strand reverse transcription kit with oligo-(dT) primers. The first strand cDNA was diluted (1:5) with water and used as a template for qRT-PCR. Nine MaWRKYs were detected by qRT-PCR analysis. Specific gene primers (Table S9) were designed using PRIMER5 software. MaActin (Genebank accession numbers: EF672732) was used as an internal control to normalize the relative expression of the target genes. The relative expression levels of MaWRKYs were assessed based on the 2−ΔΔCt method [59]. Each sample contained three replicates.

4.6. Construction of Regulatory Networks

Based on the banana genome database and transcriptome analysis, the co-expression network of MaWRKY21 was extracted and the network connections were visualized using Cytoscape software v.3.4.0 [30,31].

4.7. Y1H Assay

The MaICS promoter (1692 bp) was amplified by PCR with forward primer 5’-CCCAAGCTTACTGTCCTTTTGGGGAAG-3’ (with the Hind III site) and reverse primer 5’-CCGCTCGAGGGACAGCCAACAACTCCG-3’ (with the Xho I site) and then cloned into Hind III and Xho I restriction sites of the Y1H bait vector pAbAi (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), generating pAbAi-MaICSp. MaWRKY21 was amplified by PCR with forward primer 5’-CGGAATTCATGGGATCGGCTTGGTTG-3’ (with the EcoR I site) and reverse primer 5’-CGGGATCCTTAAAGCATCATCCCGGA-3’ (with the BamH I site) and then cloned into EcoR I and BamH I restriction sites of pGADT7, generating pGADT7-MaWRKY21. The Y1H experiment was conducted according to the instructions of the manufacturer using Matchmaker Gold Y1H System (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). DNA–protein interactions were determined according to co-transformed growth on SD/-Leu medium supplemented with aureobasidin A. The transformed yeast cells were cultured on plates of SD/-Leu/AbA300 at 30 °C for 3–5 days.

4.8. Dual-Luciferase Reporting System Assay

The promoter of MaICS (1692 bp) was cloned into a pGreenII 0800-LUC vector to generate reporter vector (MaICSp:LUC). The full-length coding region of MaWRKY21 was connected with pGreenII 62-SK to construct an effector vector. The vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 containing the pSoup auxiliary plasmid by the heat shock method. The reporter and effector constructs were co-transformed into tobacco leaves. After the injected tobacco plants were cultured in a light incubator for 48 h, luciferase (LUC) and Renilla luciferase (REN) were measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The promoter activity was assessed based on the LUC/REN ratio. Ten biological replicates were employed for each combination.

4.9. GUS Reporting System Assay

To verify whether MaWRKY21 could regulate the MaICS promoter, GUS transactivation assays were performed in banana fruit slices as described by Liu [60]. The full-length CDSs of MaWRKY21 were cloned into PVKH, generating the effector vector, 35S:MaWRKY21. The promoter of MaICS was cloned into the pBI121 vector, generating reporter vector MaICSp:GUS. The effector and reporter vectors were co-transformed into banana fruit slices using the Agrobacterium-mediated method. GUS activity and GUS staining of these infiltrated banana fruit slices were analyzed until 72 h after infiltration. The PB1121 empty vector was used as a positive control. These assays were repeated at least three times with similar results.

4.10. Statistical Analyses

A Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis. The experimental results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was expressed by * p values < 0.05 and high statistical significance was expressed by ** p values < 0.01.

5. Conclusions

We identified 164 MaWRKYs based on version 2 of the M. acuminata genome and 162 MaWRKYs were located on 11 different chromosomes. All 164 MaWRKYs were classified into three groups (I, II, and III), and group II was classified into five sub-groups (IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe). The expression profiles of MaWRKYs were analyzed during different stages of fruit development and ripening and under different stressors. We found that many MaWRKYs were involved in banana fruit development and ripening stages; 10 MaWRKYs responded to drought, cold, and salt stress at the same time. MaWRKYs were systematically downregulated after inoculation with Foc4 TR4. MaWRKY21 directly bound to the W-box of the MaICS promoter to decrease MaICS transcription and, in turn, enzyme activity; this is the first report of this in banana.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11050662/s1; Table S1: The molecular weight and isoelectric points of the MaWRKYs. Table S2: Gene list of segmental and tandem duplication. Table S3: Sample of tissues and stage/treatment used for RNA-Seq. Table S4: The expression data of MaWRKYs in banana fruit development and ripening stages. Table S5: The expression data (log2 Ratio Cold/Control) of the MaWRKYs after cold treatment. Table S6: The expression data (log2 Ratio Osmotic/Control) of the MaWRKYs after osmotic treatment. Table S7: The expression data (log2Ratio Salt/Control) of the MaWRKYs after salt treatment. Table S8: The expression data (log2 Ratio 2 DPI/0 DPI) of the MaWRKYs after inoculated Foc TR4. Table S9: PCR primers for expression analyses of MaWRKYs. Table S10: The characteristics of linked proteins with MaWRKY21. Table S11: Comparison with the number of genes in previous articles. The red font is the different gene in the two versions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.J., Z.J., and J.L. (Jihong Liu); formal analysis, J.L. (Juhua Liu), H.M., and B.X.; software, Z.W.; validation, J.W., J.Z., and C.J.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J.; writing—review and editing, J.L. (Juhua Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (319MS091), National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CATAS (1630052020006), supported by China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-31).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and its Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eulgem, T.; Rushton, P.J.; Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ishiguro, S.; Nakamura, K. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA-binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 5′ upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and β-amylase from sweet potato. Mol. Gen. Genet. MGG 1994, 244, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gu, Y.; Ji, Z.; Chi, F.; Qiao, Z.; Xu, C.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Q.; Zhou, Z. Bioinformatics and expression analysis of the WRKY gene family in apple. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2015, 48, 3221–3238. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  5. Kumari, S.; Kanth, B.K.; Ahn, J.K.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, G.J. Genome-wide transcriptomic identification and functional insight of lily WRKY genes responding to botrytis fungal disease. Plants 2021, 10, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Guo, D.; Li, C.; Peng, S. Identification and expression profiles of the WRKY transcription factor family in Ricinus Communis. Gene 2012, 503, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, M.; Xu, Z.; Tian, C.; Huang, Y.; Wang, F.; Xiong, A. Genomic identification of WRKY transcription factors in carrot (Daucus carota) and analysis of evolution and homologous groups for plants. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dou, L.; Zhang, X.; Pang, C.; Song, M.; Wei, H.; Fan, S.; Yu, S. Genome-wide analysis of the WRKY gene family in cotton. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2014, 289, 1103–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dong, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, Z. Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 51, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, X.; Chen, C.; Fan, B.; Chen, Z. Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1310–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ramamoorthy, R.; Jiang, S.Y.; Kumar, N.; Venkatesh, P.N.; Ramachandran, S. A comprehensive transcriptional profiling of the WRKY gene family in rice under various abiotic and phytohormone treatments. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 865–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Zou, X.; Casaretto, J.; Ho, T.H.; Shen, Q. A rice WRKY gene encodes a transcriptional repressor of the gibberellin signaling pathway in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zou, X.; Seemann, J.R.; Neuman, D.; Shen, Q.J. A WRKY gene from creosote bush encodes an activator of the abscisic acid signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 55770–55779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, X.; Yang, G.; Komatsu, S.; Shen, Q. Interactions of two abscisic-acid induced WRKY genes in repressing gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant J. 2006, 46, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shekhawat, U.K.; Ganapathi, T.R. MusaWRKY71 overexpression in banana plants leads to altered abiotic and biotic stress responses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, Z.; Jia, C.; Li, J.; Huang, S.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z. Activation of salicylic acid metabolism and signal transduction can enhance resistance to Fusarium wilt in banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Brazilian). Funct. Integr. Genom. 2015, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, C.; Hwang, S.; Fang, I.; Kwon, S.; Park, S.; Ahn, I.; Kim, J.; Hwang, D. Molecular characterization of Oryza sativa WRKY6, which binds to W-box-like element 1 of the Oryza sativa pathogenesis-related (PR) 10a promoter and confers reduced susceptibility to pathogens. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 846–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Verk, M.C.; Bol, J.F.; Linthorst, H.J. WRKY transcription factors involved in activation of SA biosynthesis genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zheng, X.Y.; Spivey, N.W.; Zeng, W.; Liu, P.P.; Fu, Z.Q.; Klessig, D.F.; He, S.Y.; Dong, X. Coronatine promotes Pseudomonas syringae virulence in plants by activating a signaling cascade that inhibits salicylic acid accumulation. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 11, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, X.; Gao, J.; Zhu, Z.; Dong, X.; Wang, X.; Ren, G.; Zhou, X.; Kuai, B. TCP transcription factors are critical for the coordinated regulation of isochorismate synthase 1 expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2015, 82, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aurore, G.; Parfait, B.; Fahrasmane, L. Bananas, raw materials for making processed food products. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2009, 20, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Asten, P.J.A.; Fermont, A.M.; Taulya, G. Drought is a major yield loss factor for rained east african highland banana. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kang, G.; Wang, Z.; Xia, K.; Sun, G. Protection of ultrastructure in chilling-stressed banana leaves by salicylic acid. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2007, 8, 277–282. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, Y.; Hu, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Jia, C.; Miao, H.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z. A banana aquaporin gene, MaPIP1,1, is involved in tolerance to drought and salt stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Heslop-Harrison, J.S.; Schwarzacher, T. Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ploetz, R.C. Fusarium wilt of banana is caused by several pathogens referred to as Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. D’Hont, A.; Denoeud, F.; Aury, J.M.; Baurens, F.C.; Carreel, F.; Garsmeur, O.; Noel, B.; Bocs, S.; Droc, G.; Rouard, M.; et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 2012, 488, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, Z.; Miao, H.; Liu, J.; Xu, B.; Yao, X.; Xu, C.; Zhao, S.; Fang, X.; Jia, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Musa balbisiana genome reveals subgenome evolution and functional divergence. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kaliyappan, R.; Viswanathan, S.; Suthanthiram, B.; Subbaraya, U.; Marimuthu Somasundram, S.; Muthu, M. Evolutionary expansion of WRKY gene family in banana and its expression profile during the infection of root lesion nematode, pratylenchus coffeae. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Goel, R.; Pandey, A.; Trivedi, P.K.; Asif, M.H. Genome-wide analysis of the musa WRKY gene family: Evolution and differential expression during development and stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Martin, G.; Baurens, F.C.; Droc, G.; Rouard, M.; Cenci, A.; Kilian, A.; Hastie, A.; Doležel, J.; Aury, J.M.; Alberti, A.; et al. Improvement of the banana “Musa acuminata” reference sequence using NGS data and semi-automated bioinformatics methods. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Z.; Jia, C.; Wang, J.; Miao, H.; Liu, J.; Chen, C.; Yang, H.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z. Genome wide analysis of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors to elucidate candidate genes related to fruit ripening and stress in banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA Group, cv. Brazilian). Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 650. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wildermuth, M.C.; Dewdney, J.; Wu, G.; Ausubel, F.M. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature 2001, 414, 562–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wan, Y.; Mao, M.; Wan, D.; Yang, Q.; Yang, F.; Li, G.; Wang, R. Identification of the WRKY gene family and functional analysis of two genes in Caragana intermedia. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhou, Q.; Tian, A.; Zou, H.; Xie, Z.; Lei, G.; Huang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, S. Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008, 6, 486–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Van Verk, M.C.; Pappaioannou, D.; Neeleman, L.; Bol, J.F.; Linthorst, H.J. A novel WRKY transcription factor is required for induction of PR-1a gene expression by salicylic acid and bacterial elicitors. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1983–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ulker, B.; Somssich, I.E. WRKY transcription factors: From DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Song, H.; Wang, P.; Lin, J.; Zhao, C.; Bi, Y.; Wang, X. Genome-wide identification and characterization of WRKY gene family in peanut. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Huang, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Peng, X.; Niu, X.; Fei, Z.; Cao, S.; Liu, Y. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2012, 287, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, X.; Li, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mo, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Wei, C.; Zhang, X. Identification and expression analyses of WRKY genes reveal their involvement in growth and abiotic stress response in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asif, M.H.; Lakhwani, D.; Pathak, S.; Gupta, P.; Bag, S.K.; Nath, P.; Trivedi, P.K. Transcriptome analysis of ripe and unripe fruit tissue of banana identifies major metabolic networks involved in fruit ripening process. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, T.; Tan, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Han, Z. Phylogenetic analysis and drought-responsive expression profiles of the WRKY transcription factor family in maize. Agri Gene 2017, 3, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Yang, X.; Li, Q.; Ling, J.; Wang, H.; Gu, X.; Huang, S.; Jiang, W. CsWRKY46, a WRKY transcription factor from cucumber, confers cold resistance in transgenic plant by regulating a set of cold-stress responsive genes in an ABA-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 108, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, X.; Song, Y.; Xing, F.; Wang, N.; Wen, F.; Zhu, C. GhWRKY25, a group I WRKY gene from cotton, confers differential tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 1265–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, Q.; Zhong, M.; Li, S.; Pan, Y.Z.; Jiang, B.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, H. Overexpression of a chrysanthemum transcription factor gene, DgWRKY3, in tobacco enhances tolerance to salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 69, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shan, W.; Chen, J.; Kuang, J.; Lu, W. Banana fruit NAC transcription factor MaNAC5 cooperates with MaWRKYs to enhance the expression of pathogenesis related genes against Colletotrichum musae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Luo, D.; Ba, L.; Shan, W.; Kuang, J.; Lu, W.; Chen, J. Involvement of WRKY transcription factors in abscisic-acid-induced cold tolerance of banana fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3627–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, W.; Hao, L.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Guo, X.; Li, H. The gossypium hirsutum WRKY gene GhWRKY39-1 promotes pathogen infection defense responses and mediates salt stress tolerance in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Tu, M.; Wang, D.; Guo, C.; Wan, R.; Li, Z.; Wang, X. Ectopic expression of the wild grape WRKY transcription factor VqWRKY52 in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances resistance to the biotrophic pathogen powdery mildew but not to the necrotrophic pathogen botrytis cinerea. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pérez-Rodríguez, P.; Riano-Pachon, D.M.; Corrêa, L.G.G.; Rensing, S.A.; Kersten, B.; Mueller-Roeber, B. PlnTFDB: Updated content and new features of the plant transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 38, D822–D827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Jin, J.; Zhang, H.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Luo, J. PlantTFDB 3.0: A portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42, D1182–D1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lee, T.H.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Paterson, A.H. PGDD: A database of gene and genome duplication in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D1152–D1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Arnon, D.I.; Hoagland, D.R. A comparison of water culture and soil as media for crop production. Science 1939, 89, 512–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mortazavi, A.; Williams, B.A.; McCue, K.; Schaeffer, L.; Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Audic, S.; Claverie, J.M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Livark, K.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, J.; Liu, M.; Jia, C.; Zhang, J.; Miao, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Xu, B.; Li, X.; et al. Elucidating the mechanism of MaGWD1-mediated starch degradation cooperatively regulated by MaMADS36 and MaMADS55 in banana. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 179, 111587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 00662 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of WRKY TFs constructed based on WRKY domains from Arabidopsis (in green and prefised by At) and rice (in purple and prefised by Os), and M. acuminata (in red and prefised by Ma).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of WRKY TFs constructed based on WRKY domains from Arabidopsis (in green and prefised by At) and rice (in purple and prefised by Os), and M. acuminata (in red and prefised by Ma).
Plants 11 00662 g001
Plants 11 00662 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution and synteny analysis of MaWRKYs on the 11 chromosomes. The vertical black line indicates the position of MaWRKY. The segmental duplicate MaWRKYs are connected with green lines. Tandem duplicates were marked with red dots.
Figure 2. Distribution and synteny analysis of MaWRKYs on the 11 chromosomes. The vertical black line indicates the position of MaWRKY. The segmental duplicate MaWRKYs are connected with green lines. Tandem duplicates were marked with red dots.
Plants 11 00662 g002
Plants 11 00662 g003 550
Figure 3. WRKY gene family conserved domain, WRKYGQK conserved domain in the red box, red asterisk refers to zinc finger structure.
Figure 3. WRKY gene family conserved domain, WRKYGQK conserved domain in the red box, red asterisk refers to zinc finger structure.
Plants 11 00662 g003
Plants 11 00662 g004 550
Figure 4. Heatmap of differentially expressed MaWRKYs in five tissues during fruit development and ripening.
Figure 4. Heatmap of differentially expressed MaWRKYs in five tissues during fruit development and ripening.
Plants 11 00662 g004
Plants 11 00662 g005 550
Figure 5. Expression patterns of MaWRKYs in response to abiotic and biotic stress. (A) salt; (B) osmotic; (C) cold; (D) Foc TR4.
Figure 5. Expression patterns of MaWRKYs in response to abiotic and biotic stress. (A) salt; (B) osmotic; (C) cold; (D) Foc TR4.
Plants 11 00662 g005
Plants 11 00662 g006 550
Figure 6. The number of genes involved in two or three abiotic stresses at the same time.
Figure 6. The number of genes involved in two or three abiotic stresses at the same time.
Plants 11 00662 g006
Plants 11 00662 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression patterns of nine MaWRKYs under Foc TR4 treatment by qRT-PCR. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. * and ** significantly different from the control at p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 7. Expression patterns of nine MaWRKYs under Foc TR4 treatment by qRT-PCR. The data represent the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. * and ** significantly different from the control at p < 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.
Plants 11 00662 g007
Plants 11 00662 g008 550
Figure 8. The interactive networks of MaWRKY21 using Cytoscape.
Figure 8. The interactive networks of MaWRKY21 using Cytoscape.
Plants 11 00662 g008
Plants 11 00662 g009 550
Figure 9. The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by Y1H assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for Y1H assay. (B) Y1H assay.
Figure 9. The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by Y1H assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for Y1H assay. (B) Y1H assay.
Plants 11 00662 g009
Plants 11 00662 g010 550
Figure 10. The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by LUC/REN and GUS assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for LUC/REN assay. (B) Relative LUC/REN ratio. (C) Schematic diagram vectors for GUS assay. (D) GUS staining in banana fruits and GUS activity. (D1) Positive control; (D2) MaICS promoter; (D3) MaWRKY21 + reporter; (D4) GUS activity. * significantly different from the control at p < 0.05.
Figure 10. The interaction between MaWRKY21 and MaICS promoter by LUC/REN and GUS assay. (A) Schematic diagram vectors for LUC/REN assay. (B) Relative LUC/REN ratio. (C) Schematic diagram vectors for GUS assay. (D) GUS staining in banana fruits and GUS activity. (D1) Positive control; (D2) MaICS promoter; (D3) MaWRKY21 + reporter; (D4) GUS activity. * significantly different from the control at p < 0.05.
Plants 11 00662 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Miao, H.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Liu, J.; Jin, Z.; Liu, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Banana WRKY Transcription Factor Gene Family Closely Related to Fruit Ripening and Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050662

AMA Style

Jia C, Wang Z, Wang J, Miao H, Zhang J, Xu B, Liu J, Jin Z, Liu J. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Banana WRKY Transcription Factor Gene Family Closely Related to Fruit Ripening and Stress. Plants. 2022; 11(5):662. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Caihong, Zhuo Wang, Jingyi Wang, Hongxia Miao, Jianbin Zhang, Biyu Xu, Juhua Liu, Zhiqiang Jin, and Jihong Liu. 2022. "Genome-Wide Analysis of the Banana WRKY Transcription Factor Gene Family Closely Related to Fruit Ripening and Stress" Plants 11, no. 5: 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050662

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop