Next Article in Journal
The Impact of N.I. Vavilov on the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources in Scandinavia: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity and Geographic Distribution of Cucurbit-Infecting Begomoviruses in the Philippines
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Fertilization and Solvents as Factors Modifying the Antioxidant and Anticancer Potential of Arnica montana L. Flower Head Extracts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathogen Resistance Depending on Jacalin-Dirigent Chimeric Proteins Is Common among Poaceae but Absent in the Dicot Arabidopsis as Evidenced by Analysis of Homologous Single-Domain Proteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Large–Scale Transposon Mutagenesis Reveals Type III Secretion Effector HopR1 Is a Major Virulence Factor in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae

1
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba 305-8572, Ibaraki, Japan
2
Western Highlands Agriculture and Forestry Science Institute, 53 Nguyen Luong Bang Street, Buon Ma Thuot City 630000, Vietnam
3
Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Miki 761-0795, Kagawa, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010141
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 27 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Plant Protection)

Abstract

:
Bacterial canker of kiwifruit caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) is a serious threat to kiwifruit production worldwide. Four biovars (Psa biovar 1; Psa1, Psa biovar 3; Psa3, Psa biovar 5; Psa5, and Psa biovar 6; Psa6) were reported in Japan, and virulent Psa3 strains spread rapidly to kiwifruit production areas worldwide. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop critical management strategies for bacterial canker based on dissecting the dynamic interactions between Psa and kiwifruit. To investigate the molecular mechanism of Psa3 infection, we developed a rapid and reliable high-throughput flood-inoculation method using kiwifruit seedlings. Using this inoculation method, we screened 3000 Psa3 transposon insertion mutants and identified 91 reduced virulence mutants and characterized the transposon insertion sites in these mutants. We identified seven type III secretion system mutants, and four type III secretion effectors mutants including hopR1. Mature kiwifruit leaves spray-inoculated with the hopR1 mutant showed significantly reduced virulence compared to Psa3 wild-type, indicating that HopR1 has a critical role in Psa3 virulence. Deletion mutants of hopR1 in Psa1, Psa3, Psa5, and Psa6 revealed that the type III secretion effector HopR1 is a major virulence factor in these biovars. Moreover, hopR1 mutants of Psa3 failed to reopen stomata on kiwifruit leaves, suggesting that HopR1 facilitates Psa entry through stomata into plants. Furthermore, defense related genes were highly expressed in kiwifruit plants inoculated with hopR1 mutant compared to Psa wild-type, indicating that HopR1 suppresses defense-related genes of kiwifruit. These results suggest that HopR1 universally contributes to virulence in all Psa biovars by overcoming not only stomatal-based defense, but also apoplastic defense.

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas syringae induces a variety of symptoms such as leaf spots, cankers, galls, wilt, and blights on different plants, and can be classified into more than 60 pathovars (pv.) based on their host plant specificities and disease symptoms [1,2]. P. syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), a causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, is an economically important pathogen worldwide. Psa was first found in Japan and causes severe damage to kiwifruit plants and decreases yield [3,4]. Psa strains are organized into five biovars including biovar 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 based on biochemical, pathogenicity, and molecular characteristics [5,6]. Psa3 strains with enhanced virulence were reported in 2008 in Italy, and a pandemic spread rapidly to kiwifruit production areas worldwide [3]. Major control strategies include chemical treatments such as copper fungicides and antibiotics [7], but they are associated with potential risks such as induction of Psa resistance strains, phytotoxicity, and fruit chemical residues [8,9,10]. Resistance breeding is another control strategy, but cultivar development is slow [11]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate Psa infection mechanisms to develop effective and sustainable control strategies.
P. syringae has two lifestyles, an epiphytic phase on the plant leaf surface and an endophytic phase in the apoplastic space [2,12]. The bacterium generally enters host tissues through natural openings such as stomata and multiplies in the apoplast to cause disease in nature [13]. Plants have developed monitoring systems that recognize potential invading pathogens and activate a wide range of immune responses to defend themselves [14,15]. The first line of plant defense against invading bacterial pathogens is pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI), which recognizes conserved molecules such as flagellin and elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) of the invading bacterial pathogens using plant pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), such as FLS2 and EFR, respectively [16,17,18]. After recognition of invading bacterial pathogens with PRRs, plants activate many defense mechanisms including stomatal-based defense, rapid oxidative burst, restriction of nutrient transfer from the cytosol to the apoplastic space, the accumulation of antimicrobial compounds including phytoalexins, and the activation of hormone-mediated signaling pathways leading to defense responses [12,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Stomatal-based defense to restrict bacterial pathogen entry by stomatal closure is one of the earliest responses in PTI [12,28,29,30]. However, successful bacterial pathogens have evolved to acquire multiple virulence factors such as phytotoxins and type III secretion system (T3SS) effectors (T3SEs) to overcome PTI and stomatal-based defense [31,32]. The T3SS translocates bacterial effector proteins into host cells, which is central for pathogenesis in diverse plant-bacterial interactions [33]. P. syringae has canonical tripartite pathogenicity islands (T-PAIs), with the hrp and hrc gene clusters encoding the T3SS flanked by both the conserved effector locus (CEL) such as hopM1 and avrE, and the exchangeable effector loci (EEL) [34]. T3SS effectors (T3SEs) have functional overlap by targeting different steps in PTI [35]. Plant immunity suppression and creation of an aqueous apoplast are two main features of P. syringae leaf infection [36,37]. These virulence strategies, supported by the right environmental conditions (for example, high humidity) are a prerequisite for successful endophytic growth [37].
To identify virulence related genes in bacterial pathogens, forward screens have been conducted in previous studies [38,39,40]. Generation and characterization of transposon insertion mutation libraries is one of the most efficient screens. In previous studies, Tn5 mutant bacterial pathogen forward screenings were performed with various plants and inoculation methods to identify reduced virulence mutants. Plants have been inoculated with P. syringae using syringe pressure infiltration, vacuum infiltration, sprays, and dips to investigate the molecular basis of plant-pathogen interactions [41]. Syringe pressure infiltration is the most commonly used method [11]. Conventional soil-grown plant inoculation assays including stem puncture inoculation, syringe pressure infiltration, and spray inoculation were used to study Psa and kiwifruit interactions [11,42,43]. However, to functionally investigate P. syringae-plant molecular interactions, the inoculation assay should mimic natural infection and be suitable for high-throughput assays. We developed a rapid and reliable flood-inoculation method using kiwifruit seedlings that had been grown in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [44] based on flood-inoculation using P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 [45,46,47].
Here, we developed a high-throughput screening method using kiwifruit seedlings grown in MS medium to investigate Psa virulence mechanisms. Using this screening method, we screened 3000 Psa3 transposon insertion mutants and identified 91 virulence related genes. We focused on the T3SS effector HopR1 identified from this screening, and revealed that HopR1 is a major Psa virulence factor. Here, we demonstrated that HopR1 contributes to Psa virulence on kiwifruit plants in both early and later stages of the infection process by suppressing stomatal-based and apoplastic defenses.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of Psa3 Mutants with Reduced Virulence

We conducted a screening for mutants with reduced virulence of Psa biovar 3 (MAFF 212115) (Supplementary Figure S1). At this point, two kiwifruit seedlings were dip-inoculated with 3000 individual Psa3 Tn5 mutants for initial screening, and we observed disease symptoms up to 14 days post inoculation (dpi). Disease symptoms on kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with Psa3 wild-type (WT) included leaf spot and necrosis (Figure 1). A total of 225 mutants showed reduced virulence in the initial screening, and flood-inoculations were conducted with six kiwifruit seedlings for a secondary screening. Six seedlings were evaluated for virulence score by counting infected seedlings, and we observed disease symptoms at 7 dpi. This secondary seedling screening was repeated at least three times. Mutant strains showing a virulence score of less than 4 were chosen for further analyses. A total of 91 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit (Figure 1, Supplementary Figure S2–S4). These Tn5 mutants were also tested for their ability to grow on minimal medium containing mannitol and fructose (MMMF). Nine mutants were partial auxotroph because they did not grow in MMMF (Table 1).

2.2. Identification of Genes Disrupted by Tn5 Insertions

Next, we identified the Tn5 insertion sites of 91 mutant strains that showed reduced virulence. Our results suggest that various virulence factors are needed for the infection process by Psa3 (Table 1). Well-known virulence factors included those involved in T3SS and T3SEs and cell motility/chemotaxis/adhesion, along with transporters. Several genes were identified as a hypothetical protein, whose function was unknown. Furthermore, we identified regulators, including signal transduction regulators involved in two component systems, and transcription factors, which are required for survival during environmental stress conditions. Other Tn5 insertions were located in genes related to primary metabolism such as nucleotide metabolism, amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid metabolism (Table 1).
Three partial auxotroph mutants in amino acid metabolism had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding serine hydroxymethyltransferase (GlyA-2), ketol-acid reductoisomerase, and homoserine O-acetyltransferase (MetX). Moreover, three partial auxotroph mutants in carbohydrate metabolism had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding 6-phosphogluconolactonase (Pgl), aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, and aconitate hydratase. Further, two partial auxotroph transporter mutants and one in type IV secretion system had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding protein, autotransporting lipase, GDSL family, and protein disulfide-isomerase (Table 1).
The mutants that showed complete pathogenicity impairment on kiwifruit seedlings (virulence score 0) had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding serine hydroxymethyltransferase, ketol-acid reductoisomerase, T3SS protein HrcU, T3SS protein HrcJ, T3SS protein HrcR, and T3SS protein HrpR. The category of ‘‘type III secretion system” and ‘‘amino acid metabolism and transport’’ were enriched in these genes (Table 1).

2.3. Bacterial Growth of the Virulence Mutants in Plant Tissue

To determine whether the reduction in disease symptom production was correlated with reduced multiplication in plant tissue, 91 mutants were analyzed for their ability to grow in kiwifruit seedlings after flood-inoculation. The Psa3-15 WT multiplied from 6 to 6.5 (Log [CFU/mg]), and all the mutants except six (TZ32, TAc09, TBh17, TBp22, TBu09, and TBw17) exhibited a significant growth reduction relative to Psa3-15 WT on kiwifruit seedlings (Supplementary Figure S5A–C).

2.4. Hypersensitive Response Cell Death Assay with T3SS/T3E Mutants

The T3SS/T3SEs had the greatest number of mutant strains showing reduced virulence (Table 2 and Table S2). We identified five mutant strains (TD35, TJ40, TAh32, TAl39, and TBi11) including duplicates (as hrpR mutants, TD35 and TAl39) of the T3SS, two mutant T3SS helper strains (TAw18 and TAd35), and four T3SE mutant strains (TM33, TR23, TBr13, and TBw35) (Supplementary Table S2). The T3SS mutants showed complete pathogenicity impairment on kiwifruit seedlings (virulence score 0). T3SS locaters TAw18 and TAd35 had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding type III helper protein HrpK1 and lytic transglycosylase (HrpH). Previous studies showed that both of these genes encoding translocators of T3SS effectors elicited reduced hypersensitive response (HR) cell death [50,51]. To confirm this, T3SS/T3SE mutants were assayed for their ability to elicit macroscopic tissue collapse indicative of HR on nonhost tobacco leaves. Inconsistent with virulence scores, the T3SS mutants failed to cause HR cell death, except for TAw18 and TAd35. TAw18 elicited reduced HR cell death compared to Psa3 WT, while TAd35 showed the same levels of HR cell death as Psa3 WT.
All T3SE mutants induced HR cell death (Supplementary Figure S6) and did not show complete pathogenicity impairment on kiwifruit seedlings (Supplementary Table S2). TM33, TR23, TBr13, and TBw35 had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding type III effectors HopZ3, HopR1, HopAC1, and AvrE1, respectively. Despite the HR phenotype, TR23 exhibited a significantly reduced virulence score of 0.67. This mutant strain had Tn5 insertions in genes encoding the type III effector HopR1.

2.5. HopR1 Contributes to Psa3 Virulence

Growth of the T3SS/T3SE mutants did not differ significantly at 24 h based on a growth curve assay (Supplementary Figure S7). To investigate whether the T3SS/T3SEs play an important role in causing disease on kiwifruit seedlings, we flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with Psa3 WT and the T3SS/T3SE mutants. All kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with the T3SS/T3SE mutants exhibited less leaf spot and necrosis symptoms at 7 dpi (Figure 2A). Kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with T3SS mutants showed no symptoms, whereas kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with T3SS locaters and T3SEs showed fewer symptoms compared to Psa3 WT. Seedlings inoculated with the TR23 (hopR1 mutant) showed the least number of symptoms among the T3E mutants. We also investigated whether the T3SS/T3SEs contribute to bacterial multiplication in kiwifruit seedlings. T3SS/T3SE mutant populations were significantly reduced compared to Psa3 WT at 7 dpi (Figure 2B). T3SS mutant populations were approximately 10,000-fold less compared to Psa3 WT at 7 dpi (Figure 2B). T3SS locaters and T3E mutant populations were mildly reduced compared to the T3SS mutant strains. TR23 (hopR1 mutant) populations showed the greatest reduction among the T3E mutants. These results indicate that HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence on kiwifruit seedlings.
To investigate if HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence on adult kiwifruit plants, we next spray-inoculated soil-grown kiwifruit plants with Psa3 WT and the T3SS/T3SE mutants. Mature kiwifruit leaves inoculated with Psa3 WT showed severe symptoms such as leaf spots and necrosis (Figure 2C). However, severe symptoms were not observed on T3SS/T3SE-inoculated leaves. Consistent with disease development, the T3SS/T3SE mutant populations were significantly reduced compared to Psa3 WT (Figure 2C). The T3SS mutant populations were approximately 100,000-fold less compared to Psa3 WT at 7 dpi (Figure 2D). Consistent with flood-inoculation, the populations of T3SS locaters and T3Es were mildly reduced compared to the T3SS mutants. Interestingly, TR23 inoculated leaves showed a significant reduction in disease development among the T3E mutants (Figure 2C), and TR23 populations were approximately 10,000-fold less compared to Psa3 WT (Figure 2D). These results indicate that HopR1 also contributes to Psa3 virulence on mature kiwifruit plants.
In nature, P. syringae has two lifestyles, an epiphytic phase on the plant leaf surface and an endophytic phase in the apoplastic space where the bacterium multiplies to cause disease [13,14]. To determine whether HopR1 is important for apoplastic multiplication, we next conducted syringe-infiltration. Kiwifruit leaves inoculated with Psa3 WT showed necrosis at 7 dpi. Kiwifruit leaves inoculated with the T3SS mutants showed no necrosis compared to Psa3 WT (Figure 2E). However, kiwifruit leaves inoculated with the T3SS locaters and T3SEs showed less necrosis compared to Psa3 WT (Figure 2E). We next examined bacterial multiplication in kiwifruit inoculated leaves. The T3SS mutant populations were significantly smaller compared to Psa3 WT at 7 dpi (Figure 2F). The populations of T3SS locaters and T3Es were mildly reduced compared to the T3SS mutants (Figure 2F). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in disease development and bacterial populations between TR23 and the other T3E mutants (Figure 2E,F). These results indicate that HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence, but the contribution differs depending on the inoculation method. These results indicate that HopR1 might contribute to Psa3 virulence at the plant surface or before apoplastic multiplication to cause disease.

2.6. HopR1 Universally Contributes to Virulence in All Psa Biovars

Psa is currently classified into five biovars, namely biovars 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Table 2). So far, Psa biovars 1, 3, 5, and 6 have been found in Japan, and these biovars have hopR1 gene [52]. To assess the importance of HopR1 in virulence, we constructed a hopR1 mutant (ΔhopR1) in each biovar. For construction of ΔhopR1 mutant strains, we used four biovars, Psa1, Psa3-07 (same type as reference strain (ICMP18884; [53]), Psa5, and Psa6 (Table 2). Growth curve assays for each Psa WT and hopR1 mutant in LB broth showed that bacterial growth did not differ significantly at 24 h (Supplementary Figure S8A–E). Next, to investigate if HopR1 contributes to virulence in these four biovars, we conducted flood-inoculation with kiwifruit seedlings using Psa WT and the hopR1 mutant series. Consistent with a previous study [44], kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with Psa1, Psa3-07, and Psa3-15 WT exhibited severe disease symptoms such as leaf spots and necrosis; in contrast, seedlings inoculated with Psa5 and Psa6 WT exhibited mild symptoms (Figure 3A). All kiwifruit seedlings inoculated with each hopR1 mutant biovar exhibited less leaf spot and necrosis at 7 dpi (Figure 3A) compared to each Psa WT. We also investigated whether HopR1 contributes to bacterial multiplication in kiwifruits. All hopR1 mutant populations were significantly reduced compared to each Psa WT at 7 dpi (Figure 3B). These results indicate that HopR1 universally contributes to Psa virulence on kiwifruit seedlings.
Table 2. Bacterial strains and plasmid used in this study.
Table 2. Bacterial strains and plasmid used in this study.
Bacterial Strain or PlasmidRelevant CharacteristicsReference or Source
E. coli strain
DH5αF, λ, φ80dlacZDM15, D(lacZYA-argF)U169, deoR, recA1,
endA1, hsdR17 (rK, mK+), phoA, supE44, thi-1, gyrA96, relA1
Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan
S17-1F, thi, pro, hsdR, hsdM+, recA [chr::RP4-2-Tc::Km::Tn7][54]
P. syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa)
Psa1Psa biovar 1 wild-type, NalrMAFF 613022
Psa1-ΔhopR1Psa biovar 1 ΔhopR1 mutant, NalrThis study
Psa3-07Psa biovar 3 wild-type, NalrMAFF 212107
Psa3-07-ΔhopR1Psa biovar 3 ΔhopR1 mutant, NalrThis study
Psa3-15Psa biovar 3 wild-type, NalrMAFF 212115
Psa3-VR seriesWhole genome Tn5 transposon library, Nalr, Kmr, CmrThis study
Psa5Psa biovar 5 wild-type, NalrMAFF 212056
Psa5-ΔhopR1Psa biovar 5 ΔhopR1 mutant, NalrThis study
Psa6Psa biovar 6 wild-type, NalrMAFF 212133
Psa6-ΔhopR1Psa biovar 6 ΔhopR1 mutant, NalrThis study
Plasmid
pBSLC1Transposon vector constructed by ligation of pBSL118
and pHSG396 at EcoR I site, Ampr, Kmr, Cmr
[55]
Notes: Ampr ampicillin resistance, Cmr chloramphenicol resistance, Kmr kanamycin resistance, Nalr nalidixic acid resistance.
Then, to investigate if HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence in adult kiwifruit plants, we spray-inoculated soil-grown kiwifruit plants with Psa WT and the hopR1 mutants. Kiwifruit leaves inoculated with Psa3-07 and Psa3-15 WT exhibited severe symptoms such as leaf spots and necrosis on mature leaves, whereas Psa1, Psa5, and Psa6 WT caused mild symptoms on mature leaves (Figure 3C). Conversely, severe symptoms were not observed on hopR1 mutant inoculated leaves. Consistent with disease development, the hopR1 mutant populations were significantly reduced compared to Psa WT (Figure 3D). These results also indicate that HopR1 universally contributes to virulence in each Psa biovar on mature kiwifruit plants.
Finally, we conducted a syringe-infiltration to determine whether HopR1 is important for apoplastic multiplication to cause disease. Kiwifruit leaves infiltrated with Psa WT showed necrosis at 7 dpi. Kiwifruit leaves inoculated with hopR1 mutants in Psa1, Psa5, and Psa6 showed much less necrosis compared to the corresponding WT (Figure 3E). Interestingly, kiwifruit leaves inoculated with hopR1 mutants in Psa3-07 and Psa3-015 still showed necrosis, although less severe symptoms compared to the corresponding WT (Figure 3E). The hopR1 mutant populations were significantly reduced compared to each Psa WT at 7 dpi (Figure 3F). Interestingly, the hopR1 mutant populations in Psa3-07 and Psa3-015 were greater among the hopR1 mutants, although Psa3 hopR1 mutant populations were reduced compared to the corresponding WT (Figure 3F). These results indicate that HopR1 universally contributes to Psa virulence, but the contribution differs depending on the Psa biovar. More specifically, in Psa3, HopR1 might contribute to virulence at the plant surface before multiplication in the apoplast, although in biovars Psa1, Psa5, and Psa6, HopR1 might contribute to virulence both at the plant surface and apoplastic multiplication. Therefore, we hypothesized that hopR1 shows different expression patterns for each Psa biovar during infection.

2.7. HopR1 Regulates Stomatal-Based Defense and Defense-Related Gene Expression in Kiwifruits

We next determined the hopR1 expression profiles in Psa3-015 during infection. In this assay, kiwifruit seedlings were flood-inoculated with Psa3-015 WT, and at 0, 4, 24, and 48 hpi total RNAs were purified for real-time RT-qPCR [44]. Expression analysis of hrpL, hrpA1, and hopR1 was conducted using RNAs from flood-inoculated seedlings. All genes were greatly expressed at 4 hpi (Figure 4A–C), at which point bacteria are supposed to overcome stomatal-based defense. Moreover, these genes also showed great expression at 24 hpi (Figure 4A–C). Therefore, we hypothesized that HopR1 is involved in overcoming both early stages and later infection processes.
Plants are able to respond to bacterial pathogens by actively closing the stomatal pore, the so called stomatal-based defense [24,28,32]. Since we revealed that HopR1 contributes to virulence at the plant surface before multiplication in the apoplast, we next investigated whether HopR1 facilitates stomatal reopening in kiwifruit by observing the stomatal aperture width of leaves dip-inoculated with Psa WT and hopR1 mutants at 1 hpi and 4 hpi. Stomatal reopening was observed in kiwifruit inoculated with Psa WT, whereas stomatal reopening was not observed in leaves inoculated with hopR1 mutants (Figure 4D). These results suggest that HopR1 has an important role in overcoming stomatal-based defense in Psa early virulence in kiwifruit leaves.
To evaluate the effect of HopR1 on defense-related gene expression in kiwifruit leaves, we next investigated PR1 gene expression profiles in response to Psa3 WT and TR23 (hopR1 mutant). Kiwifruit PR1 genes showed significantly greater expression levels at 24 h in response to TR23 compared to Psa3 WT (Figure 4E,F). These results indicate that HopR1 suppresses defense-related gene expression in kiwifruit leaves.

3. Discussion

We developed a rapid, reliable, and high-throughput inoculation method using kiwifruit seedlings to investigate the molecular mechanism of Psa3 infection. We isolated 91 Psa3 mutants showing reduced virulence on kiwifruit seedlings and identified potential virulence factors based on their predicted function (Table 2 and Table S1). We demonstrated that the T3SS/T3SEs have an important role in Psa3 virulence. Our results also indicated that HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence on kiwifruit seedlings and mature plants (Figure 2). We also demonstrated that HopR1 contributes to Psa3 virulence on kiwifruit plants in both early and later stages of the infection process by suppressing stomatal-based and apoplastic defenses (Figure 4D–F). The results from hopR1 mutants in other Psa biovars revealed that HopR1 universally contributes to virulence in all Psa biovars (Figure 3). Our results clearly provide new insights into HopR1 virulence function during Psa infection processes.
We identified 91 Psa3 virulence factors and categorized, based on their predicted function including the T3SS and T3SEs, transporters and cell motility/chemotaxis/adhesion, regulators, primary metabolism such as nucleotide metabolism, amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and lipid metabolism (Table 2 and Table S1). Schreiber et al. [39] identified genes involved in the T3SS, periplasmic glucan biosynthesis, flagellar motility, and amino acid biosynthesis through a high-throughput screening with P. syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 transposon mutants required for virulence on Arabidopsis thaliana. Nearly half of these mutations were in genes associated with the T3SS [39]. Additionally, Brooks et al. [38] conducted a screening of Pst DC3000 and A. thaliana and found that the mutations disrupted genes involved in the T3SS, the phytotoxin coronatine, and amino acid biosynthesis. Similarly, we also identified genes involved in the T3SS and amino acid biosynthesis (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Brooks et al. [38] identified that around 15% of these genes were related to the T3SS and coronatine biosynthesis, respectively. Similarly, we found around 13% of disrupted genes were related to the T3SS. Sakata et al. [40] conducted a screening for P. cannabina pv. alisalensis KB2011 Tn5 mutants by dip-inoculation on cabbage plants. They found transporters and transcriptional regulators as virulence factors in addition to the T3SS and amino acid biosynthesis. Similarly, we found eight mutants in transporters and LysR family transcriptional regulators. Further, Helmann et al. [56] identified 4296 genes in P. syringae pv. syringae B728a that contributed to the fitness through genome-wide fitness profiling with a randomly barcoded transposon mutant library grown on the leaf surface and in the apoplast of common bean. There were many similarities between their identified genes and ours, such as amino acid metabolism and transport related genes (including serine hydroxymethyltransferase (glyA-2), homoserine O-acetyltransferase (metX), aminodeoxychorismate/anthranilate synthase component II (trpE)), carbohydrate transport and metabolism related genes (including GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (gmd)), nucleotide metabolism and transport related genes (including phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine cyclo-ligase (purM), and glycosyl transferase). Helmann et al. [56] also measured growth of Pss B728a auxotrophic mutant strains. Our results showed nine mutants that did not grow in MMMF medium as partial auxotrophs. There were also similarities between these genes identified in partial auxotroph mutants (Table 1). Since we used dip-inoculation for screening to imitate natural infection, this method led to the identification of virulence factors required during the infection process, regardless of the Pseudomonas pathovar or epiphytic and endophytic condition.
Patel et al. [57] identified 58 Psa Tn5 transposon mutants involved in lipolytic activity and their role in kiwifruit leaf colonization. Consistent with their screening, we also identified virulence genes related to chemotaxis protein, including cell division ATP-binding protein FtsE (ftsE), protein disulfide-isomerase (dsbC), and dienelactone hydrolase. Chemotaxis is a way for plant-pathogenic bacteria to sense and respond to chemicals released from plant tissues to the leaf surface [58,59,60]. Zhao et al. [61] identified probable pathogenic genes by detecting divergent Psa3 strain mutations using a computational pipeline. There were also several similarities between their identified genes and ours such as filamentous hemagglutinin, FAD-dependent oxidoreductase, ABC transporter, and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter. Jayaraman et al. [62] showed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) mutants GDP-D-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (Δgmd) in both Psa1 and Psa3 displayed reduced virulence compared to their WT. They characterized a P. syringae LPS, common polysaccharide antigen (CPA) locus from Psa1 and Psa3. This locus has genes for L- and D-rhamnose biosynthesis, and an operon coding for ABC transporter subunits, a bifunctional glycosyltransferase, and an O-methyltransferase. We also identified genes such as gmd, sugar ABC transporter, and glycosyltransferase. These results show that not only is the screening system we developed working correctly, but also that this system is able to identify virulence factors efficiently during Psa infection. Although it is necessary to investigate the precise functional analysis of each virulence factor, these similarities and virulence scores suggest their important role in Psa virulence mechanisms.
Although the T3SS/T3SEs had the greatest number of mutant strains showing reduced virulence, the virulence score trends were different (Table 1 and Table S1). Based on virulence score and HR cell death (Supplementary Figure S6), the T3SS/T3SEs mutants were categorized into three groups, T3SS mutants (showed complete pathogenicity impairment with virulence score 0, no HR), T3SS locaters (virulence score 0.67-3 and less HR), and T3SEs (virulence score 0.67–3.3 and WT HR level). Previous studies showed that HrpK1 and HrpH contributed to translocation of T3SEs. They elicited reduced HR cell death and the elicitation activity by the mutants depended on their concentration [48,49]. Consistent with their results, we also demonstrated that T3SS locater mutants elicited a reduced, or the same, level of HR cell death compared to Psa3 WT. The T3SEs, hopZ3 and hopAC1 mutants showed, respectively, high virulence scores of 3 and 3.67. In fact, the hopAC1 gene in Psa3 appears to be disrupted by a transposable element in the Pseudomonas genome as well as its gene in Pst DC3000 [63]. HopZ3 is involved in survival and growth of Pss B728a on leaf surfaces to enzymatically modify host targets [64]. Taken together, HopZ3 and HopAC1 contribute to Psa virulence, partially or during the epiphytic phase at leaf surfaces.
We identified both avrE1 and hopR1 as reduced virulence mutants from our screening (Table 1). AvrE1 and HopR1 were identified as AvrE/DspA/E/HopR superfamily members [35]. Xin et al. [36] demonstrated that the virulence function of HopM1 and AvrE1 can be substituted by supplying water to the apoplast to establish an aqueous living space in plant leaves. Jayaraman et al. [65] showed that HopM1 does not contribute to Psa3 virulence due to a gene truncation, and AvrE1 and HopR1 are required for Psa3 virulence. Further, Jin et al. [66] showed that Pst DC3000 AvrE1 targets plant protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to disrupt PP2A normal function, which positively regulates early PTI signaling. Taken together, in Psa3, AvrE1 and HopR1 may contribute to establish an aqueous living space in plant leaves. We identified both avrE1 and hopR1 mutants from our screening. Kiwifruit seedlings and mature plants inoculated with the hopR1 mutant showed the least symptoms and multiplication among the T3SEs (Figure 2D). We also demonstrated that the hopR1 and avrE1 mutants showed remarkable virulence reduction with spray-inoculation compared to flood-inoculation (Figure 2D). Conversely, there were no significant differences in disease development and bacterial populations between the hopR1 mutant and other T3E mutants with syringe-inoculation (Figure 2E,F). Further, we demonstrated that HopR1 contributes to Psa virulence on kiwifruit plants in both early and later stages of the infection process by suppressing stomatal-based and apoplastic defenses (Figure 4F). Pst DC3000 HopR1 also contributes to PTI suppression in N. benthamiana leaves [35]. Although the HopR1 target is still unknown, these effectors probably contribute to suppress PTI as well as to establish an aqueous living space in plant leaves. Taken together, HopR1 might contribute to virulence to suppress PTI at the plant surface or before apoplastic multiplication to cause disease.
In summary, HopR1 contributes to Psa virulence on kiwifruit plants in both early and later stages of the infection process by suppressing stomatal-based and apoplastic defenses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Kiwifruit (Actinidiae deliciosa) cv. ‘Hayward’ plants were used for all experiments. Kiwifruit seeds (100–200) were surface-sterilized in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 min in a Falcon tube (50 mL), then in 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite (FUJI- FILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan) containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h. Seeds were then washed with sterile distilled H2O at least four times and incubated in water at 4 °C overnight. Surface sterilization and washing were repeated, and seeds were germinated on one-half strength MS medium (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) containing 1% (w/v) sucrose and Gamborg vitamins (Sigma-Aldrich) solidified with 0.3% (w/v) Phytagel (Sigma-Aldrich) in deep Petri plates (100 mm × 25 mm). Four-week-old kiwifruit seedlings were grown at 24 °C with a light intensity of 150–200 μmol/ (m2 sec) and 12 h light/12 h dark before use. Eight-week-old kiwifruit plants were grown in soil for spray-inoculation and syringe-inoculation. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), cv. Xanthi plants were used for the Psa hypersensitive reaction (HR) cell death assay. Kiwifruit and tobacco plants were grown at 24 ℃ with a light intensity of 200 μEm−2s−1 and a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod.

4.2. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are shown in Table 1. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 1 (Psa1; MAFF 613022), biovar 3 (Psa3; MAFF 212115), biovar 3 (Psa3-07; MAFF 212107), biovar 5 (Psa5; MAFF 212056), and biovar 6 (Psa6; MAFF 212133) were a gift from NARO Genebank, Ibaraki, Japan. Psa biovars were used as the pathogenic strains to inoculate kiwifruit plants. All Psa strains were grown at 28 °C on King’s B (KB) [67] agar. For inoculation, Luria–Bertani (LB) [68] broth was used to grow bacterial cultures from plates for 18 h at 28 °C. Before inoculation, bacteria were suspended in sterile distilled H2O, and the bacterial cell densities at 600 nm (OD600) were measured using a JASCO V-730 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).

4.3. Generation of a Psa3 Genomic Tn5 Mutant Library

The transposon was introduced into Psa3 by conjugation with E. coli S17-1, which possessed pBSLC1 [52], and the insertion region was integrated into the Psa3 chromosome randomly. Replica plates for all transconjugants were made and used for the inoculation assay.

4.4. Plasmid Rescue of Transposon-Integrated Regions and Sequencing Analysis to Identify Insertion Sites

Genomic DNA of the mutants that showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit was purified using a Nucleospin Microbial DNA Kit (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) and digested with Hind III, Xho I, Sph I, Kpn I, Sal I, Xba I, or Hinc II (Takara Bio). The resultant DNA was ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Ligation-convenience kit, Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan), then introduced into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Plasmid DNA was purified from the transformants, and transposon-insertion sites were identified by sequencing with the M13 forward primer. A Pseudomonas Genome DB BLAST search (http://www.pseudomonas.com/blast/setnblast, accessed on 14 February 2020) was utilized to identify the function of the mutated genes.

4.5. Generation of ∆hopR1 Mutants

The genetic regions containing hopR1 and the surrounding regions were amplified using PCR primer sets (for hopR1) that were designed based on the registered sequence of Psa biovar3 (ICMP 18884) with PrimeStar HS DNA polymerase (Takara Bio). Then, dA was added to the 3′ end of the PCR product with 10× A-attachment mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). The resultant DNA was inserted into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The recombinant plasmid DNA was then used to obtain pGEM-hopR1 as templates, and inverse PCR was carried out using a primer set (for hopR1) to delete a hopR1 open reading frame. Then, the PCR product and template DNA were digested with BamH I and Dpn I. The resultant DNA was self-ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Ligation-Convenience kit, Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). The hopR1-deleted DNA constructs were introduced into the EcoR I site of the mobilizable cloning vector pK18mobsacB [69]. The resulting plasmids containing the DNA fragment lacking hopR1 were then used to transform E. coli S17-1. The deletion mutant was obtained by conjugation and homologous recombination [54]. Transconjugants were selected on KB agar containing 30 μg/mL of kanamycin (Km).

4.6. Growth Curve Assay

Psa strains including the wild type, Tn5 transposon mutants, and ∆hopR1 mutants were grown at 28 °C for 24 h in LB broth. The strain suspensions were adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1 with fresh LB broth, and the bacterial growth dynamics were measured at OD600 for 24 h.

4.7. Screening Methods

To assay for disease on kiwifruit seedlings, 3000 Psa3 Tn5 mutants were dip-inoculated on 4-week-old kiwifruit seedlings. Briefly, 10 mL of Psa3 Tn5 mutant bacterial suspension (OD600 of 0.2) in sterile distilled H2O containing 0.025% (v/v) Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialties Inc., Danbury, CT, USA) was prepared in a 15 mL falcon tube. Two of the 4-week-old kiwifruit seedlings were transferred to the tube for dip-inoculation, then, incubated for 2–3 min at room temperature. Seedlings were transferred to a new one-half strength MS plate, and plates were sealed with 3 M Micropore 2.5 cm surgical tape. Then, disease symptoms were observed up to fourteen-day post-inoculation (dpi). Mutant strains that caused little or no leaf spot were chosen for further analyses. A total of 225 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit seedlings during the first screening. A second screening was conducted using a flood-inoculation method [44]. Six seedlings were evaluated, and a virulence score assigned by counting infected seedlings, and each experiment was repeated at least three times. Ninety-one mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit seedlings from the second screening and the mutated genes were determined.

4.8. Bacterial Inoculation Methods

A flood-inoculation method was used to observe kiwifruit seedling disease symptoms with Psa. Briefly, 40 mL of bacterial suspension at 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 of 0.2) in sterile distilled H2O containing 0.025% (v/v) Silwet L-77 (OSI Specialties Inc., Danbury, CT, USA) was dispensed onto a plate containing six 4-week-old kiwifruit seedlings, and the plates were incubated for 2–3 min at room temperature. After the bacterial suspension was removed by decantation, plates containing inoculated seedlings were sealed with 3 M Micropore 2.5 cm surgical tape (3 M, St. Paul, MN, USA) and incubated at 22 °C with a light intensity of 150–200 μmol/ (m2sec) and 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. Symptoms were observed at 7- and 14-days post-inoculation (dpi). In each experiment, more than six seedlings were evaluated, and each experiment was repeated at least three times. For spray-inoculation, 6-week-old kiwifruit plants were sprayed to runoff with a bacterial suspension at 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 of 0.2) in sterile distilled water containing 0.025% Silwet L-77. The plants were then incubated in growth chambers at approximately 100% RH for the first 24 h, then at approximately 70% RH for the rest of the experiment. The inoculated plants were observed at 7 dpi for symptom development.
To determine bacterial growth in kiwifruit seedlings or leaves, we measured the internal bacterial population at 7 dpi. Inoculated seedlings or leaves were collected, and the inoculated plants were weighed. Seedlings or leaves were then surface sterilized with 10% H2O2 for 3 min, then washed three times with sterile distilled water. Plants were then homogenized in sterile distilled water, and the diluted samples were plated onto solid KB agar medium. Bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were normalized as CFU/mg using the total inoculated leaf or seedling mass. The bacterial population at 0 day was estimated using leaves harvested 1 h post-inoculation (hpi). The bacterial populations were evaluated in three independent experiments. For syringe-inoculation, bacteria were suspended at a final concentration of 5 × 106 CFU/mL (OD600 of 0.01) and infiltrated with a 1 mL blunt syringe into leaves. The plants were then incubated at 70–80% RH for the rest of the experimental period. Leaves were removed and photographed at 5 days post inoculation. The internal bacterial population was measured after syringe-inoculation. Leaf discs were harvested using a 3.5 mm-diameter cork-borer from syringe-infiltrated leaf zones. Leaf extracts were homogenized in sterile distilled water, and diluted samples were plated onto solid KB agar medium at 7 dpi. After dilution sample plating, the bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) were counted and normalized as CFU per milligram or CFU per cm2, using the total leaf weight or leaf square meters. The bacterial populations were evaluated in at least three independent experiments.
To analyze Psa3-induced HR cell death in tobacco leaves, bacterial suspensions (5 × 107 CFU/mL) of Psa3 WT and virulence mutants were prepared and infiltrated into leaves using a 1 mL needleless syringe. HR cell death was observed 24 h after infiltration.

4.9. Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR

For Psa3 gene expression profiles in culture or during infection, we incubated Psa3 in LB broth for 3 h or flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h. For expression profiles in culture conditions, Psa3 was grown in LB broth for 24 h, then adjusted to an OD600 of 0.1 with fresh LB broth and grown for 3 h to investigate the exponential phase expression profiles. Total RNA was extracted from kiwifruit seedlings by an ultra-sonication method as described in [44]. Briefly, 6 seedlings were collected, immediately submerged in 5 mL of RNAlater Stabilization Solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), sonicated for 7 min, then seedlings were removed from the solution. The bacterial cells in the suspension were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 2 min, and cell pellets were used for subsequent purification. Total RNA was extracted using Reliaprep (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For gene expression profiles of kiwifruit defense-related genes, four-week-old kiwifruit seedlings were flood-inoculated with Psa3 WT and hopR1 mutant. At 24 and 48 h after inoculation, total RNA was extracted from the inoculated kiwifruit seedlings and purified using Maxwell® RSC Instrument (Promega) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Total RNA (2 µg) was treated with gDNA Remover (TOYOBO) to eliminate genomic DNA, and the DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (TOYOBO). The cDNA (1:20) was then used for qRT-PCR using the primers shown in supplementary Table S1 with THUNDERBIRD® SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO) on a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System (Takara Bio). Three genes encoding fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, chromosome participating protein ParA, and a TetR family transcriptional regulator were used for normalizing the Psa results [70]. Kiwifruit actin (ACT) and ubiquitin (UBQ) genes were used for normalizing the kiwifruit results [71,72].

4.10. Stomatal Assay

Kiwifruit plants were grown in soil for around 6 weeks after germination. Psa WT and hopR1 mutants were grown at 28 °C for 24 h on KB agar, then suspended in distilled water to an OD600 of 0.2 (1 × 108 CFU/mL). Kiwifruits leaves were floated on stomatal opening buffer (10 mM MES-KOH, 20 mM KCl, pH 6.3). Four hours after treatment, kiwifruits leaves were dip inoculated with Psa WT and hopR1 mutants. Dip-inoculated kiwifruits leaves were directly imaged at 1 hpi and 4 hpi using a Nikon optical microscope (Eclipse 80i). The aperture width of at least 100 stomata was measured. The average and standard error for the stomatal aperture width were calculated. The stomatal apertures were evaluated in at least three independent experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12010141/s1. Figure S1: Large-scale Psa3 transposon mutagenesis screening using kiwifruit seedlings. (A) Planting the seeds on one-half strength MS plates. (B) Kiwifruit seedlings two weeks after germination. (C) Transferring the seedlings to new one-half strength MS plates with forceps. Seedling incubation at 24 °C with a light intensity of 150–200 μE m−2 sec−1 and a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiod. (D) Four-week-old kiwifruit seedlings for screening. (E) Preparation of Psa3 transposon mutant inoculum (OD600 = 0.2). (F) Dip-inoculation for two kiwifruit seedlings. (G) Transferring the seedlings to new one-half strength MS plates. (H) Disease phenotypes of kiwifruit seedlings 14 days after inoculation with Psa3 transposon mutants. Figure S2: Second screening results in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Tn5 transposon mutants (line number from 1 to 1040). Disease symptoms in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 = 0.2) of Psa3 WT and mutants containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Figure S3: Second screening results in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Tn5 transposon mutants (line number from 1041 to 2080). Disease symptoms in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 = 0.2) of Psa3 WT and mutants containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Figure S4: Second screening results in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Tn5 transposon mutants (line number from 2081 to 3000). Disease symptoms in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 = 0.2) of Psa3 WT and mutants containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Figure S5: Bacterial populations in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Psa3 WT and mutants selected from the second screening. Bacterial populations in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with 1 × 108 CFU/mL (OD600 = 0.2) of Psa3 WT and mutants from (A) line number from 1 to 1040, (B) line number from 1041 to 2080 and (C) line number from 2081 to 3000 containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. The bacterial populations were obtained by homogenizing the inoculated leaves after surface-sterilization and plating dilutions to selective media at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi). Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the WT and each mutant in a t test (* p< 0.05, ** p< 0.01). Figure S6: HR cell death assay with the type III secretion mutants in tobacco leaves. The leaf areas were infiltrated with type III secretion mutants indicated at 5 × 107 CFU/mL and photographed 1 day post-inoculation (dpi). ++, extensive necrosis; +, reduced necrosis; -, no symptoms. Figure S7: Growth of type III secretion mutants in LB medium. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured in three replicates per strain for 6, 12, and 24 h. Vertical lines indicate the standard deviation. Figure S8: Growth of hopR1 mutants in each Psa biovar in LB medium. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured in three replicates per strain for 6, 12, and 24 h. (A) Psa3-15 WT and TR23. (B) Psa1 WT and ΔhopR1 mutant (C) Psa3-07 WT and ΔhopR1 mutant. (D) Psa5 WT and ΔhopR1 mutant. (E) Psa6 WT (blue) and ΔhopR1 mutant. Table S1: Number of genes within each functional category from the Psa3 transposon disruption screening. Functional category annotations for the Psa3 genes are primarily based on COG [48] and KEGG [49] annotations, with manual additions. Table S2: Defining gene and gene function of Psa3 type III secretion system and effector mutants. Table S3: Primers (5′ to 3′) used in this study. Spreadsheets: The data presented in this study.

Author Contributions

T.I. and Y.I. designed the experiments; T.I., N.S., V.T.N., G.U., K.G. and Y.I. performed the experiments; T.I. and Y.I. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO) NOMURA Microbial Community Control Project, grant number JPMJER1502 and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, grant number 19K06045 and 21J10765.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Supplementary Material here.

Acknowledgments

We thank Christina Baker for editing this manuscript. Psa biovars were the gift of the NARO Genebank, Ibaraki, Japan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mansfield, J.; Genin, S.; Magori, S.; Citovsky, V.; Sriariyanum, M.; Ronald, P.; Dow, M.; Verdier, V.; Beer, S.V.; Machado, M.A.; et al. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 614–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Xin, X.F.; He, S.Y. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: A model pathogen for probing disease susceptibility and hormone signaling in plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Scortichini, M.; Marcelletti, S.; Ferrante, P.; Petriccione, M.; Firrao, G. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: A re-emerging, multi-faceted, pandemic pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Takikawa, Y.; Serizawa, S.; Ichikawa, T.; Tsuyumu, S.; Goto, M. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae pv. nov.: The causal bacterium of canker of kiwifruit in Japan. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 1989, 55, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fujikawa, T.; Sawada, H. Genome analysis of the kiwifruit canker pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 5. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Fujikawa, T.; Sawada, H. Genome analysis of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 6, which produces the phytotoxins, phaseolotoxin and coronatine. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cameron, A.; Sarojini, V. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae: Chemical control, resistance mechanisms and possible alternatives. Plant Pathol. 2013, 63, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nakajima, M.; Goto, M.; Hibi, T. Similarity between copper resistance genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and P. syringae pv. tomato. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2002, 68, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Serizawa, S.; Takikawa, Y.; Ichikawa, T.; Tsuyumu, S.; Goto, M. Occurrence of bacterial canker of kiwifruit in Japan: Description of symptoms, isolation of the pathogen and screening of bactericides. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 1989, 55, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vanneste, J.; Voyle, M. Genetic basis of copper resistance in New Zealand strains of Pseudomonas syringae. N. Z. Plant Prot. 1989, 56, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kisaki, G.; Tanaka, S.; Ishihara, A.; Igarashi, C.; Morimoto, T.; Hamano, K.; Endo, A.; Sugita-Konishi, S.; Tabuchi, M.; Gomi, K.; et al. Evaluation of various cultivars of Actinidia species and breeding source Actinidia rufa for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2019, 84, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Melotto, M.; Underwood, W.; He, S.Y. Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2008, 46, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lindow, S.E.; Brandl, M.T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1875–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hacquard, S.; Spaepen, S.; Garrido-Oter, R.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 565–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zipfel, C. Pattern-recognition receptors in plant innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008, 20, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zipfel, C.; Felix, G. Plants and animals: A different taste for microbes? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zipfel, C.; Kunze, G.; Chinchilla, D.; Caniard, A.; Jones, J.D.G.; Boller, T.; Felix, G. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 2006, 125, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ahuja, I.; Kissen, R.; Bones, A.M. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bednarek, P. Chemical warfare or modulators of defense responses—The function of secondary metabolites in plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berens, M.L.; Berry, H.M.; Mine, A.; Argueso, C.T.; Tsuda, K. Evolution of hormone signaling networks in plant defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 401–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, L.Q.; Hou, B.H.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.Q.; Guo, W.J.; Kim, J.G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cowan, M.M. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Melotto, M.; Underwood, W.; Koczan, J.; Nomura, K.; He, S.Y. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 2006, 126, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. O’Brien, J.A.; Daudi, A.; Butt, V.S.; Bolwell, G.P. Reactive oxygen species and their role in plant defense and cell wall metabolism. Planta 2012, 236, 765–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sawinski, K.; Mersmann, S.; Robatzek, S.; Böhmer, M. Guarding the green: Pathways to stomatal immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Fan, F.; Tan, Z.; Zou, Y.; Lu, D. A Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae effector.; XopR.; associates with receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases and suppresses PAMP-triggered stomatal closure. Sci. China Life Sci. 2016, 59, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Underwood, W.; Melotto, M.; He, S.Y. Role of plant stomata in bacterial invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1621–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ishiga, T.; Iida, Y.; Sakata, N.; Ugajin, T.; Hirata, T.; Taniguchi, S.; Hayashi, K.; Ishiga, Y. Acibenzolar-S-methyl activates stomatal-based defense against Pseudomonas cannabina pv. alisalensis in cabbage. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2020, 86, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ishiga, T.; Sakata, N.; Ugajin, T.; Ishiga, Y. Acibenzolar-S-methyl and probenazole activate stomatal-based defense at different times to control bacterial blight of cabbage. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2021, 87, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lozano-Durán, R.; Bourdais, G.; He, S.Y.; Robatzek, S. The bacterial effector HopM1 suppresses PAMP-triggered oxidative burst and stomatal immunity. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Melotto, M.; Zhang, L.; Oblessuc, P.R.; He, S.Y. Stomatal defense a decade later. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Büttner, D.; He, S.Y. Type III protein secretion in plant pathogenic bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 656–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Clarke, C.R.; Cai, R.; Studholme, D.J.; Guttman, D.S.; Vinatzer, B.A. Pseudomonas syringae strains naturally lacking the classical P. syringae hrp/hrc locus are common leaf colonizers equipped with an atypical type III secretion system. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kvitko, B.H.; Park, D.H.; Velásquez, A.C.; Wei, C.F.; Russell, A.B.; Martin, G.B.; Schneider, D.J.; Collmer, A. Deletions in the repertoire of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 type III secretion effector genes reveal functional overlap among effectors. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xin, X.F.; Nomura, K.; Aung, K.; Velásquez, A.C.; Yao, J.; Boutrot, F.; Chang, J.H.; Zipfel, C.; He, S.Y. Bacteria establish an aqueous living space in plants crucial for virulence. Nature 2016, 539, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xin, X.F.; Kvitko, B.; He, S.Y. Pseudomonas syringae: What it takes to be a pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brooks, D.M.; Hernández-Guzmán, G.; Kloek, A.P.; Alarcón-Chaidez, F.; Sreedharan, A.; Rangaswamy, V.; Peñaloza-Vázquez, A.; Bender, C.L.; Kunkel, B.N. Identification and characterization of a well-defined series of coronatine biosynthetic mutants of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Schreiber, K.J.; Ye, D.; Fich, E.; Jian, A.; Lo, T.; Desveaux, D. A high-throughput forward genetic screen identifies genes required for virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 on Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sakata, N.; Ishiga, T.; Saito, H.; Nguyen, V.T.; Ishiga, Y. Transposon mutagenesis reveals Pseudomonas cannabina pv. alisalensis optimizes its virulence factors for pathogenicity on different hosts. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Katagiri, F.; Thilmony, R.; He, S.Y. The Arabidopsis thaliana-Pseudomonas syringae interaction. Arab. Book 2002, 1, e0039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bartoli, C.; Lamichhane, J.R.; Berge, O.; Guilbaud, C.; Varvaro, L.; Balestra, G.M.; Vinatzer, B.A.; Morris, C.E. A framework to gauge the epidemic potential of plant pathogens in environmental reservoirs: The example of kiwifruit canker. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, X.; Huang, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Han, Q.; Ke, X.; Qin, H.; Huang, L. Studies on the infection, colonization, and movement of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae in kiwifruit tissues using a GFPuv-labeled strain. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ishiga, T.; Sakata, N.; Nguyen, V.T.; Ishiga, Y. Flood inoculation of seedlings on culture medium to study interactions between Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and kiwifruit. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2020, 27, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ishiga, Y.; Ishiga, T.; Uppalapati, S.R.; Mysore, K.S. Arabidopsis seedling flood-inoculation technique: A rapid and reliable assay for studying plant-bacterial interactions. Plant Methods. 2011, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ishiga, Y.; Ishiga, T.; Ichinose, Y.; Mysore, K.S. Pseudomonas syringae flood-inoculation method in Arabidopsis. Bio-Protocol 2017, 7, e2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Uppalapati, S.R.; Ishiga, Y.; Wangdi, T.; Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E.; Ishiga, T.; Mysore, K.S.; Bender, C.L. Pathogenicity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato on tomato seedlings: Phenotypic and gene expression analyses of the virulence function of coronatine. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chen, I.M.A.; Chu, K.; Palaniappan, K.; Pillay, M.; Ratner, A.; Huang, J.; Huntemann, M.; Varghese, N.; White, J.R.; Seshadri, R.; et al. IMG/M v.5.0: An integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kvitko, B.H.; Ramos, A.R.; Morello, J.E.; Oh, H.S.; Collmer, A. Identification of harpins in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.; which are functionally similar to HrpK1 in promoting translocation of type III secretion system effectors. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8059–8072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oh, H.S.; Kvitko, B.H.; Morello, J.E.; Collmer, A. Pseudomonas syringae lytic transglycosylases coregulated with the type III secretion system contribute to the translocation of effector proteins into plant cells. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8277–8289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sawada, H.; Fujikawa, T. Genetic diversity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, pathogen of kiwifruit bacterial canker. Plant Pathol. 2019, 68, 1235–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McCann, H.C.; Rikkerink, E.H.; Bertels, F.; Fiers, M.; Lu, A.; Rees-George, J.; Andersen, M.T.; Gleave, A.P.; Haubold, B.; Wohlers, M.W.; et al. Genomic analysis of the kiwifruit pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae provides insight into the origins of an emergent plant disease. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shimizu, R.; Taguchi, F.; Marutani, M.; Mukaihara, T.; Inagaki, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Shiraishi, T.; Ichinose, Y. The ΔfliD mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci, which secretes flagellin monomers, induces a strong hypersensitive reaction (HR) in non-host tomato cells. Mol. Genet Genomics. 2003, 269, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sawada, T.; Eguchi, M.; Asaki, S.; Kashiwagi, R.; Shimomura, K.; Taguchi, F.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Noutoshi, Y.; Toyoda, K.; et al. MexEF-OprN multidrug efflux pump transporter negatively controls N-acyl-homoserine lactone accumulation in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605. Mol. Genet Genomics. 2018, 293, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Helmann, T.C.; Deutschbauer, A.M.; Lindow, S.E. Genome-wide identification of Pseudomonas syringae genes required for fitness during colonization of the leaf surface and apoplast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019, 116, 18900–18910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Patel, H.K.; Ferrante, P.; Xianfa, M.; Javvadi, S.G.; Subramoni, S.; Scortichini, M.; Venturi, V. Identification of loci of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae involved in lipolytic activity and their role in colonization of kiwifruit leaves. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yao, J.; Allen, C. Chemotaxis is required for virulence and competitive fitness of the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3697–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Tumewu, S.A.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Noutoshi, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Ichinose, Y. Requirement of γ-aminobutyric acid chemotaxis for virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605. Microbes Environ. 2020, 35, ME20114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tumewu, S.A.; Ogawa, Y.; Okamoto, T.; Sugihara, Y.; Yamada, H.; Taguchi, F.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Noutoshi, Y.; Toyoda, K.; et al. Cluster II che genes of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci 6605.; orthologs of cluster I in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.; are required for chemotaxis and virulence. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2021, 296, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, Z.; Chen, J.; Gao, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Wen, J.; Qin, H.; Guo, M.; Huang, L. Comparative genomics reveal pathogenicity-related loci in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 20, 923–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jayaraman, J.; Jones, W.T.; Harvey, D.; Hemara, L.M.; McCann, H.C.; Yoon, M.; Warring, S.L.; Fineran, P.C.; Mesarich, C.H.; Templeton, M.D. Variation at the common polysaccharide antigen locus drives lipopolysaccharide diversity within the Pseudomonas syringae species complex. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 5356–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schechter, L.M.; Vencato, M.; Jordan, K.L.; Schneider, S.E.; Schneider, D.J.; Collmer, A. Multiple approaches to a complete inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 type III secretion system effector proteins. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 1180–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Lee, J.; Teitzel, G.M.; Munkvold, K.; del Pozo, O.; Martin, G.B.; Michelmore, R.W.; Greenberg, J.T. Type III secretion and effectors shape the survival and growth pattern of Pseudomonas syringae on leaf surfaces. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1803–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Jayaraman, J.; Yoon, M.; Applegate, E.R.; Stroud, E.A.; Templeton, M.D. AvrE1 and HopR1 from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae are additively required for full virulence on kiwifruit. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 21, 1467–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jin, L.; Ham, J.H.; Hage, R.; Zhao, W.; Soto-Hernández, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Paek, S.M.; Kim, M.G.; Boone, C.; Coplin, D.L.; et al. Direct and indirect targeting of PP2A by conserved bacterial type III effector proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. King, E.O.; Ward, M.K.; Raney, D.E. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1954, 44, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  69. Schäfer, A.; Tauch, A.; Jäger, W.; Kalinowski, J.; Thierbach, G.; Pühler, A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: Selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 1994, 145, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. McAtee, P.A.; Brian, L.; Curran, B.; van der Linden, O.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Chen, X.; Henry-Kirk, R.A.; Stroud, E.A.; Nardozza, S.; Jayaraman, J.; et al. Re-programming of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae gene expression during early stages of infection of kiwifruit. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kaji, R.; Yariuchi, R.; Fujii, Y.; Taniguchi, S.; Uji, Y.; Suzuki, G.; Kashihara, K.; Kisaki, G.; Suezawa, K.; Ohtani, M.; et al. Expression analysis of defense-related genes in bacterial canker-tolerant wild kiwifruit; Actinidia rufa. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2021, 87, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ferradás, Y.; Rey, L.; Martínez, Ó.; Rey, M.; González, M.V. Identification and validation of reference genes for accurate normalization of real-time quantitative PCR data in kiwifruit. Plant Physiol. Biochem 2016, 102, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The workflow to identify Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 virulence factor mutants. The transposon was introduced into Psa3-15; Psa biovar 3 (MAFF 212115) by conjugation with E. coli S17-1, which possessed pBSLC1, and the insertion region was integrated into the Psa3-15 chromosome randomly. To assay for disease on kiwifruit seedlings (first screening), 3000 individual Psa3-15 Tn5 mutants were dip-inoculated onto two kiwifruit plants, which were about 3 to 4 weeks old. Then, disease symptoms were observed up to 14 days post-inoculation (dpi). Mutant strains that caused little or no leaf spot were chosen for further analyses. A total of 225 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit and were flood-inoculated on six kiwifruit seedlings. A virulence score was assigned by counting infected seedlings, and each experiment was repeated at least three times. Mutant strains with a virulence score less than 4 were chosen for further analyses. A total of 91 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit and the mutated genes were determined. To identify the mutated genes, the resultant DNA was ligated with T4 DNA ligase, then introduced into E. coli DH5α competent cells. A Pseudomonas Genome DB BLAST search (http://www.pseudomonas.com/blast/setnblast, accessed on 14 February 2020) was utilized to identify the function of the mutated genes.
Figure 1. The workflow to identify Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 virulence factor mutants. The transposon was introduced into Psa3-15; Psa biovar 3 (MAFF 212115) by conjugation with E. coli S17-1, which possessed pBSLC1, and the insertion region was integrated into the Psa3-15 chromosome randomly. To assay for disease on kiwifruit seedlings (first screening), 3000 individual Psa3-15 Tn5 mutants were dip-inoculated onto two kiwifruit plants, which were about 3 to 4 weeks old. Then, disease symptoms were observed up to 14 days post-inoculation (dpi). Mutant strains that caused little or no leaf spot were chosen for further analyses. A total of 225 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit and were flood-inoculated on six kiwifruit seedlings. A virulence score was assigned by counting infected seedlings, and each experiment was repeated at least three times. Mutant strains with a virulence score less than 4 were chosen for further analyses. A total of 91 mutants showed reduced virulence on kiwifruit and the mutated genes were determined. To identify the mutated genes, the resultant DNA was ligated with T4 DNA ligase, then introduced into E. coli DH5α competent cells. A Pseudomonas Genome DB BLAST search (http://www.pseudomonas.com/blast/setnblast, accessed on 14 February 2020) was utilized to identify the function of the mutated genes.
Plants 12 00141 g001
Figure 2. Disease symptoms and bacterial populations in kiwifruit inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 WT and type III secretion mutants. Disease symptoms (A) and bacterial populations (B) in seedlings flood-inoculated with P. syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 (Psa3) WT and type III secretion mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (C) and bacterial populations (D) in kiwifruit spray-inoculated with Psa3 WT and type III secretion mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (E) and bacterial populations (F) in kiwifruit syringe-inoculated with Psa3 WT and the type III secretion mutants (5 × 106 CFU/mL). The leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between Psa3 WT and the type III secretion mutants in a t test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). Scale bar shows 1 cm.g.
Figure 2. Disease symptoms and bacterial populations in kiwifruit inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 WT and type III secretion mutants. Disease symptoms (A) and bacterial populations (B) in seedlings flood-inoculated with P. syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 (Psa3) WT and type III secretion mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (C) and bacterial populations (D) in kiwifruit spray-inoculated with Psa3 WT and type III secretion mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (E) and bacterial populations (F) in kiwifruit syringe-inoculated with Psa3 WT and the type III secretion mutants (5 × 106 CFU/mL). The leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between Psa3 WT and the type III secretion mutants in a t test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). Scale bar shows 1 cm.g.
Plants 12 00141 g002
Figure 3. Disease symptoms and bacterial populations in kiwifruit inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants. Disease symptoms (A) and bacterial populations (B) in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (C) and bacterial populations (D) in kiwifruit plants spray-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (E) and bacterial populations (F) in kiwifruit plants syringe-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (5 × 106 CFU/mL). The leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between Psa WT and ΔhopR1 mutant in a t test (** p < 0.01). Scale bar shows 1 cm.
Figure 3. Disease symptoms and bacterial populations in kiwifruit inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants. Disease symptoms (A) and bacterial populations (B) in kiwifruit seedlings flood-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (C) and bacterial populations (D) in kiwifruit plants spray-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (1 × 108 CFU/mL) containing 0.025% SilwetL-77. Disease symptoms (E) and bacterial populations (F) in kiwifruit plants syringe-inoculated with Psa WT and Psa biovar ΔhopR1 mutants (5 × 106 CFU/mL). The leaves were photographed at 7 dpi. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between Psa WT and ΔhopR1 mutant in a t test (** p < 0.01). Scale bar shows 1 cm.
Plants 12 00141 g003
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) genes during kiwifruit seedling infection and kiwifruit defense responses to Psa WT and Psa ΔhopR1 mutants. Expression profiles of Psa3 hrpL (A), hrpA1 (B), and hopR1 (C) genes in in flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with the Psa3-15 WT (1 × 108 CFU/mL) at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h. Total RNA was extracted for use in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with gene-specific primer sets (Table S3). Expression was normalized using fructose-bisphosphate aldolase fbp, chromosome participating protein parA, and tetR family transcriptional regulator. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from 0 time in a t test (** p < 0.01). (D). Stomatal aperture width on kiwifruit leaves 1 h and 4 h after dip-inoculation with 1 × 108 CFU/mL of Psa WT and hopR1 mutants. OB indicates stomatal opening buffer. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from WT in a t test (** p < 0.01). Expression profiles of kiwifruit defense marker PR1 genes (E,F) in flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with the Psa3-15 WT and hopR1 mutant (1 × 108 CFU/mL) at 24 and 48 h. Total RNA was extracted for use in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with gene-specific primer sets (Table S3). Expression was normalized using kiwifruit actin (ACT) and ubiquitin (UBQ) genes. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from WT in a t test (* p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Expression profiles of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) genes during kiwifruit seedling infection and kiwifruit defense responses to Psa WT and Psa ΔhopR1 mutants. Expression profiles of Psa3 hrpL (A), hrpA1 (B), and hopR1 (C) genes in in flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with the Psa3-15 WT (1 × 108 CFU/mL) at 0, 4, 24, and 48 h. Total RNA was extracted for use in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with gene-specific primer sets (Table S3). Expression was normalized using fructose-bisphosphate aldolase fbp, chromosome participating protein parA, and tetR family transcriptional regulator. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from 0 time in a t test (** p < 0.01). (D). Stomatal aperture width on kiwifruit leaves 1 h and 4 h after dip-inoculation with 1 × 108 CFU/mL of Psa WT and hopR1 mutants. OB indicates stomatal opening buffer. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from WT in a t test (** p < 0.01). Expression profiles of kiwifruit defense marker PR1 genes (E,F) in flood-inoculated kiwifruit seedlings with the Psa3-15 WT and hopR1 mutant (1 × 108 CFU/mL) at 24 and 48 h. Total RNA was extracted for use in real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) with gene-specific primer sets (Table S3). Expression was normalized using kiwifruit actin (ACT) and ubiquitin (UBQ) genes. Vertical bars indicate the standard error for three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from WT in a t test (* p < 0.05).
Plants 12 00141 g004
Table 1. Classification and characteristics of Psa3 transposon disruption mutants.
Table 1. Classification and characteristics of Psa3 transposon disruption mutants.
ClassificationMutantLocusDescriptionGene NameVirulence ScoreGrowth in MMMF
Amino acid metabolism and transportTJ35IYO_RS04020Serine hydroxymethyltransferaseglyA-20-
TK40IYO_RS23580Ketol-acid reductoisomerase 0-
TK18IYO_RS25805Homoserine O-acetyltransferasemetX1-
TQ26IYO_RS196401-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase 1.33+
TAk13IYO_RS29530Aminodeoxychorismate/anthranilate synthase component IItrpE3+
Carbohydrate transport and metabolismTAr22IYO_RS064006-phosphogluconolactonasepgl0.67-
TBt16IYO_RS10680Transaldolasetal1+
TAc31IYO_RS02340Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase 1.33-
TBc20IYO_RS23010GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratasegmd2+
TAt22IYO_RS10265Aconitate hydrataseacnA2.67-
Cell motility/Chemotaxis/AdhesionTA15IYO_RS28990Filamentous hemagglutinin 1+
TS01IYO_RS09885Fagellar basal body rod protein FlgFflgF1.33+
TAh35IYO_RS13580Chemotaxis protein 2+
TAg29IYO_RS23025Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 2.67+
TAw30IYO_RS09875Flagellar hook protein FlgEflgE2.67+
TAv34IYO_RS26210Fimbrial proteinpilQ3.33+
TV06IYO_RS18685Chemotaxis protein 3.67+
DNA processing and modificationTN40IYO_RS11935Group II intron maturase 1.67+
TBw17IYO_RS29390Transposase 2+
TAc15IYO_RS29385Integrase 2.33+
TAz17IYO_RS21055DEAD/DEAH box helicase 2.33+
TAl20IYO_RS00095Serine recombinase 2.67+
TBj10IYO_RS05170Integrase 2.67+
TZ39IYO_RS00125Type III restriction protein res subunit 2.67+
TAj16IYO_RS27700Transposase 3+
TW16IYO_RS16675Integrase 3+
Glycosyl transferaseTAc09IYO_RS22975Glycosyl transferase 2.33+
TAm12IYO_RS22990Glycosyl transferase family 1 2.33+
Hypothetical proteinTBf09IYO_RS29775Hypothetical protein 1.67+
TY14IYO_RS19470Hypothetical protein 1.67+
TBa33IYO_RS20550Hypothetical protein 2+
TU31IYO_RS18120Hypothetical protein 2.33+
TU37IYO_RS23615Hypothetical protein 2.33+
TAt06IYO_RS07375Hypothetical protein 2.67+
TAk12IYO_RS14405Hypothetical protein 3+
TM22IYO_RS26985Hypothetical protein 3.33+
Lipid metabolism and transportTBj05IYO_RS15545Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 3+
TAj03IYO_RS220051-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 3.33+
TBf32IYO_RS00500AcetyltransferasedsbB3.33+
TBo40IYO_RS07835Acetyltransferase 3.33+
MembraneTC07IYO_RS00540Membrane protein 2.33+
TBp22IYO_RS20435Membrane protein 3+
TC14IYO_RS07875Membrane protein 2+
Nucleotide metabolism and transportTBk15IYO_RS08710Phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine cyclo-ligasepurM0.67+
TV14IYO_RS2490523S rRNA pseudouridine synthase DrluD1+
TX17IYO_RS20385FAD-dependent 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine(34) oxidoreductase MnmCmnmC1.67+
TAd31IYO_RS05655Pyrimidine utilization protein D 2+
TBb34IYO_RS25270Ribonuclease RvacB2+
TAm23IYO_RS27525Cell division ATP-binding protein FtsEftsE3+
TBh17IYO_RS19355Endonuclease/exonuclease/phosphatase 3+
TBl30IYO_RS08955Cytidylate kinasecmk3+
TAr33IYO_RS1831023S rRNA (guanine(2445)-N(2))/(guanine(2069)-N(7))- methyltransferase 3.33+
TBv24IYO_RS21455tRNA 5-methoxyuridine(34)/uridine 5-oxyacetic acid(34) synthase CmoB 3.33+
OthersTAz15IYO_RS16115Monooxygenase 2+
TBc29IYO_RS29540Coenzyme F390 synthetase 2+
TY16IYO_RS15475N-acetyltransferase 2+
TH14IYO_RS15735Alcohol dehydrogenase 2.67+
PeptidaseTT37IYO_RS02615Peptidase M23 1.33+
TAc18IYO_RS27100Peptidase M20 2+
TBt26IYO_RS12305Zn-dependent hydrolase 3.33+
Signal transduction/
Transcriptional regulator
TR05IYO_RS11995LysR family transcriptional regulatorlysR0.67+
TX21IYO_RS04255Sensor domain-containing phosphodiesterase 2+
TAa14IYO_RS06430DNA-binding response regulator 2.67+
TAa40IYO_RS16240Two-component sensor histidine kinasecolS3.33+
TZ32IYO_RS07365Hybrid sensor histidine kinase/response regulator 3.33+
TA08IYO_RS04485DNA-binding transcriptional activator OsmEosmE4+
TE04IYO_RS21745Sigma-54 dependent transcriptional regulator/
response regulator
4+
Sulfur metabolismTC13IYO_RS00620Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase 3.67+
Type III secretion system/Type III secretion effectorTAh32IYO_RS06840Type III secretion system export apparatus switch proteinhrcU0+
TAl39IYO_RS06775Sigma-54-dependent Fis family transcriptional regulatorhrpR0+
TBi11IYO_RS06800Type III secretion inner membrane ring proteinhrcJ0+
TD35IYO_RS06775Sigma-54-dependent Fis family transcriptional regulatorhrpR0+
TJ40IYO_RS06855Type III secretion system export apparatus proteinhrcR0+
TAw18IYO_RS06905Type III helper protein HrpK1hrpK10.67+
TR23IYO_RS24135Type III effector HopR1hopR10.67+
TBw35IYO_RS06765Type III effector AvrE1avrE12.33+
TAd35IYO_RS06770Lytic transglycosylasehrpH2.67+
TBr13IYO_RS25475Type III effector HopAC1hopAC13+
TM33IYO_RS28930Avirulence protein HopZ3hopZ33.67+
TransportersTAy25IYO_RS23000Sugar ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 1-
TP3IYO_RS16960Ectoine/hydroxyectoine ABC transporter permease subunit EhuC 1.33+
TBo16IYO_RS15485OmpA family protein 1.67+
TW19IYO_RS02405Autotransporting lipase, GDSL family 1.67-
TL23IYO_RS11430AI-2E family transporter 2.33+
TY11IYO_RS21760MFS transporter 2.67+
TBr15IYO_RS01165ABC transporter ATP-binding protein 3+
TBu09IYO_RS27805Sulfonate ABC transporterssuC3.33+
Type IV secretion systemTBr28IYO_RS07305Protein disulfide-isomerasedsbC0.33-
TAd01IYO_RS08235Conjugative coupling factor TraD, PFGI-1 class 2.67+
Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolismTU11IYO_RS15180Dienelactone hydrolase 1.33+
TBd36IYO_RS16315(2Fe-2S)-binding proteinvanA3+
The Tn5 insertion sites were determined using a Pseudomonas Genome DB BLAST search based on the Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae ICMP 18884 genome database. Functional category annotations for Psa3 genes are primarily based on COG [48] and KEGG [49] annotations. The Tn5 mutants were tested for their ability to grow on MMMF minimal medium.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishiga, T.; Sakata, N.; Usuki, G.; Nguyen, V.T.; Gomi, K.; Ishiga, Y. Large–Scale Transposon Mutagenesis Reveals Type III Secretion Effector HopR1 Is a Major Virulence Factor in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Plants 2023, 12, 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010141

AMA Style

Ishiga T, Sakata N, Usuki G, Nguyen VT, Gomi K, Ishiga Y. Large–Scale Transposon Mutagenesis Reveals Type III Secretion Effector HopR1 Is a Major Virulence Factor in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Plants. 2023; 12(1):141. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishiga, Takako, Nanami Sakata, Giyu Usuki, Viet Tru Nguyen, Kenji Gomi, and Yasuhiro Ishiga. 2023. "Large–Scale Transposon Mutagenesis Reveals Type III Secretion Effector HopR1 Is a Major Virulence Factor in Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae" Plants 12, no. 1: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop