Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the Mechanism of Action of Serratia rubidaea Mar61-01 against Botrytis cinerea in Strawberries
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Characterization and Analysis of R2R3-MYB Genes Related to Fruit Ripening and Stress Response in Banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA Group, cv. ‘Cavendish’)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/plants12010153
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Different Elicitors on Micropropagation, Biomass and Secondary Metabolite Production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—A Review

by
Kamelia Miladinova-Georgieva
,
Maria Geneva
*,
Ira Stancheva
,
Maria Petrova
,
Mariana Sichanova
and
Elisaveta Kirova
Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics—Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Street, Building 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(1), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010153
Submission received: 5 December 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Physiology and Crop Production)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni is a valuable plant whose products are increasingly used in medicine, pharmacy and the food industry. This necessitates the use of biotechnological approaches for its mass propagation. Establishing optimal conditions for in vitro cultivation is essential for obtaining high biomass and secondary metabolites production. A large number of articles considering the role of plant growth regulators and other additives in the culture medium in the growth and development of Stevia are available in the literature. However, there are no summarized data about the use of nanoparticles in Stevia tissue cultures. Therefore, this review also includes the research conducted so far on the effect of nanoparticles on Stevia micropropagation. Furthermore, the influence of different elicitors on secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of in vitro-cultivated Stevia plants have been discussed. By referring to the collected literature, we concluded that biotechnological approaches applied to S. rebaudiana cultivation might improve the agronomic traits of plants and steviol glycosides production.

1. Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni)

1.1. Botanical Description

Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni is a herbaceous perennial plant of the Asteraceae family [1]. It is native to South America, in particular Brazil and Paraguay [2]. The plant is approximately 60–75 cm tall, the leaf is sessile and oppositely arranged, the flower is white and the seed is very small [3]. Dr Moises Santiago Bertoni first reported this plant in 1887 [3] when he learned of its unique properties from the Paraguayan, Indians and Mestizos [4].

1.2. Applications

Stevia is a natural sweetener plant known as Sweet leaf, Sweet herbs and Honey leaf [5,6,7]. The sweetness is due to the presence of more than 30 different steviol glycosides (SGs) found mainly in the leaves [2,8]. SGs are diterpenoids whose chemical structure is based on an aglycone core known as steviol (ent-13-hydroxyur-16-en-19-oic acid) to which a different number and types of sugar molecules are attached [9]. The four abundant SGs are stevioside, rebaudioside A, rebaudioside C and dulcoside A. The content of sweet components varies between 4 and 20% in the dry leaves [10]. Pure steviosides are non-caloric and 300 times sweeter than sucrose or cane sugar [3,11,12].
Stevia is used in many forms such as fresh and dried leaves, leaf powder, extracts and liquid concentrates [2]. The powdered form of the leaves has hypoglycemic and body-weight-reducing efficiency [13]. It has been recommended for diabetic and diet-conscious patients [3,13,14]. Stevia has been used in a wide range of processed foods as a substitute for conventional sugars, or artificial dietetics [15]. It is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a dietary supplement [14]. The plant is also a valuable source of proteins, carbohydrates, dietary fibers, vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids, fatty acids, and other health-favorable bioactive compounds such as non-glycosidic labdane diterpenes, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, phytosterols, chlorogenic acids and triterpenes [2,16]. Stevia extract possesses various biological activities, including antihypertensive, antidiabetic, antiobesity, antitumor, anticaries, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antifungal effects and is known to improve kidney function [2,17,18,19,20]. Nowadays, the plant is cultivated in China, Taiwan, Thailand, Korea, Japan, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Hawaii and South America for food and pharmaceutical products [7,17,21,22].

2. Propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni)

Traditionally, Stevia can be propagated using seed or stem cutting. However, the plant seeds show a very low germination percentage [23,24,25] due to inbreeding depression, which causes the production of sterile seeds [26]. Propagation using the seed also causes great variability in stevioside level and composition [27]. Vegetative propagation is limited to a low number of individuals that may be obtained from a single plant and successfully adapted to the soil [28,29]. For commercial purposes, when large-scale propagation is necessary, the conventional method of production is not adequate to fulfil the required demand. The tissue culture is the only alternative method for the mass propagation of S. rebaudiana [3]. In recent years, plant tissue culture techniques have become of major industrial importance in the area of plant propagation. Apart from their use as a tool for mass plant propagation, plant tissue culture techniques have also found application in the area of plant conservation, disease elimination, plant improvement and secondary metabolite production [30].

3. Stevia Tissue Culture Techniques

Various kinds of plant tissue culture techniques such as in vitro propagation, genetic engineering, suspension cultures, callus culture, adventitious root culture and elicitation have been developed for mass propagation, biomass and secondary metabolite production of S. rebaudiana [31]. The earliest study of Stevia tissue culture found in the literature is by Handro et al. [32]. The authors established that discs from leaves and internodal segments are able to produce vigorous calluses when cultured on synthetic media containing auxin (indole-3-acetic acid—IAA or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid—2,4-D) and cytokinin (6-benzyl aminopurine—BAP, kinetin—Kn or zeatin—Z). The best results have been obtained on media with 2,4-D (800 μg/L) and one cytokinin (BAP, Kn or Z, 200 μg/L). In the same research, the addition of adenine was also tested, without any apparent effects. Yang and Chang [33] reported the induction of multiple shoot formation on excised leaflets with a minimum of callus formation in vitro on MS media supplemented with 2–10 mg/L BAP with the following root induction on MS medium without hormones. Since then, many researchers have investigated the role of nutrient media, plant growth regulators, different additives and types of explants on the growth, development and steviol glycoside content of Stevia [14,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Nowadays, various protocols for its mass propagation in vitro have been established. Singh et al. [41] conducted a detailed review of the established protocols for Stevia micropropagation. Generally, in vitro regeneration can be achieved by somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis from different explants by manipulating the ratio of cytokinin to auxin in the nutrient medium [42,43]. Bespalhok-Filho and Hattori [14] obtained somatic embryogenesis from floret explants of S. rebaudiana cultured on the Murashige and Skoog (MS) [44] medium supplemented with 2,4-D (9.05 and 18.10 µM) and Kn (0 to 9.29 µM). On 9.05 µM of the 2,4-D supplemented medium, maximum embryogenic callus formation occurred without Kn. On 18.10 µM of the 2,4-D supplemented medium, the best treatment was with 2.32 µM Kn. The embryogenic callus started at the base of the corolla and ovary. The organogenesis of Stevia can be achieved from callus [32,45] and suspension [46] cultures, shoot tip [36], axillary bud [47], nodal [34] and leaf [33,46,48] explants, anthers [49] and flowers [50].

4. Callus and Suspension Cultures

The callus is referred to as a mass of nondifferentiated cells. A callus culture was obtained by excising an explant from the parent plant and placing it onto a nutrient medium supplemented with an appropriate combination of phytohormones [38,51]. Leaf discs and nodal explants of Stevia are able to produce callus when cultured on MS media supplemented with 2.0 mg/L BAP and 1.0 mg/L α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) [52]. Golkar et al. [40] obtained optimum callus growth on the MS medium containing 1 mg/L NAA + 0.5 mg/L BAP. Das et al. [38] reported that Kn in combination with NAA and 2,4-D exhibits better results for callus initiation, whereas the combined application of BAP and NAA in a half-strength MS medium was optimal in maintaining callus. Khalil et al. [53] reported the successful callus-mediated propagation of S. rebaudiana from leaf explants. The authors achieved the best callus induction (84.6%) on the MS medium augmented with BAP (2.0 mg/L) and 2,4-D (2.0 mg/L). The highest number of shoots per explant was obtained on a medium containing BAP (1.5 mg/L) and gibberellic acid (GA3; 0.5 mg/L). Suspension cultures are composed of isolated cells and cellular aggregates. Ferreira and Handro [46] described a method for the production, maintenance and plant regeneration of S. rebaudiana (Bert.) from cell suspension cultures. These cultures were obtained after 20–30 days by using friable callus as the initial inoculum in liquid media with BAP (0.5 mg/L) + 2,4-D (1.0 mg/L) and periodic filtering (100–500 μm sieves) with a 6–7-day interval between subcultures. Cultures derived from actively growing calli have been primarily diploid (2n = 22), whereas those derived from senescent calli have shown a wide variation in chromosome number (55–200). Stock cell suspensions that had been maintained for 3 years were plated on the basal Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) [54] agar medium with BAP (0.5 mg/L) + 2,4D (0.5 mg/L) to form callus. Calli originating from predominantly 2n cell suspensions, when transferred to a medium with Kn (2.0 mg/L) + NAA (0.02 mg/L), were able to form buds. Shoot elongation and further rooting of isolated shoots were better on an LS medium devoid of growth regulators. Variation in rooting capacity, plant vigor, morphological character and chromosome number was found amongst regenerated plants. Mathur and Shekhawat [55] (2013) established cell suspension cultures of S. rebaudiana as a strategy to obtain an in vitro stevioside producing cell line. The optimal biomass growth was obtained in a full-strength MS liquid basal medium augmented with 2,4-D (0.27 μM), BAP (0.27 μM) and ascorbic acid (0.06 μM). Callus tissues can sustain the power of cell division for a longer period and are thus suitable for the production of desirable bioactive compounds, germplasm conservation, gene manipulation and genetic engineering [31].

5. Direct Organogenesis

Yang et al. [34] (1981) obtained the highest axillary shoot proliferation by culturing nodal explants of S. rebaudiana in an MS medium supplemented with BAP (2 mg/L), Kn (10 mg/L) and N6-(2-isopentenyl)-adenine (iP; 10 mg/L). Hwang [56] reported the maximum induction of adventitious shoots from nodal explants on an MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L IAA and 0.5 mg/L Kn. Ahmed et al. [7] obtained the maximum axillary shoot proliferation from nodal explants cultured on the MS medium with 1.5 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L Kn. Thiyagarajan and Venkatachalam [57] cultivated Stevia nodal explants on the MS basal medium fortified with different concentrations of BAP (0.5–3.0 mg/L) and Kn (0.5–3.0 mg/L) individually for shoot bud induction. The maximum number of shoots (123 shoots/explant) was noted on the MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg/L BAP after three subcultures on the same media composition. Khan et al. [58] proposed a protocol for the in vitro multiplication of S. rebaudiana from nodal explants cultivated on the MS medium fortified with 2 mg/L BAP, 1 mg/L NAA and 5 mg/L urea. Tamura et al. [36] established clonal propagation of the plant species by culturing stem tips with a few leaf primordia on the LS agar medium [54] supplemented with a high concentration (10 mg/L) of Kn. The number of shoots yielded from a single shoot tip after 80 days varied from 50 to 100. Shoot primordia were induced from shoot tips on the Gamborg B5 [59] medium containing BAP and NAA [60]. Stevia shoot tip, nodal and leaf explants can regenerate shoots when cultured on an MS medium supplemented with BAP and IAA [37]. Das et al. [38] reported that shoot explants placed on MS media supplemented with Kn (2 mg/L) promoted optimal in vitro micropropagation of S. rebaudiana. In a study performed by Röck-Okuyucu et al. [39], the effect of different plant growth regulators (PGRs) (BAP, Kn, thidiazuron—TDZ, IAA and NAA) on growth and steviol glycoside content was determined. The authors conclude that a PGR-free medium provides the development of healthy plants with the simultaneous formation of shoots and roots. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) showed higher stevioside and rebaudioside A content in the leaves of Stevia grown on a PGR-free medium compared with the PGR(s)-containing media. Akbari et al. [61] established a positive effect of the addition of inorganic nitrogen sources, i.e., NH4NO3 (1650 mg/L) and KNO3 (950 mg/L), to the MS medium on some morphological traits of S. rebaudiana Bertoni derived from axillary nodes as explants. Moreover, the presence of nitrogen sources increases both the shooting and rooting of the plant. Rooting of the in vitro derived shoots could be achieved following subculture onto an auxin-containing medium [37]. Tamura et al. [36] used a medium containing NAA (0.1 mg/L) for root formation. A 96% frequency of rooting was achieved after cultivating shoot tips (>2 cm) on a half-strength MS medium augmented with 0.4 mg/L NAA [57]. Khan et al. [58] reported root induction on MS media with NAA (4 mg/L). The rooted plantlets could be successfully transferred into pots containing sand and soil in a ratio of 1:2 and subsequently cultivated in the greenhouse [57].

6. Genetic Variability

A major problem associated with in vitro culture is the possible occurrence of somaclonal variation among the subclones of parental lines [62] due to chromosomal rearrangements, DNA methylations and gene mutation [63,64]. The propagation of plants from callus tissue may bring about frequent genetic variability in the regenerated plants [36,58]. In general, plant populations produced by direct organogenesis from shoot meristems, nodal and leaf explants have been reported to be genetically uniform [58,60,65,66,67,68]. Furthermore, the clonal plants showed significantly smaller variations than the sexually propagated plants; they were almost as homogeneous as the plants propagated by cuttings [66]. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of Stevia plants obtained by indirect organogenesis from leaf explants indicated that some of the regenerated plants were 100% similar to the mother plant and some were 71, 57 or 14% similar [69]. In another study, inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analysis of Stevia plantlets obtained from callus culture showed genetic variation during the period of culturing, whereas those from nodal segments did not [68]. Soliman et al. [70] used fourteen different ISSR primers to analyze the genetic stability of eight subcultures of Stevia plantlets obtained through multiple shoot regeneration from nodal explants and mother plants. Out of all the initially tested primers, four ISSR primers generated clear, distinct and reproducible bands. All ISSR profiles from the first to fifth subcultures of micropropagated plants have been monomorphic and similar to mother plants, while low variation was induced in the next subculture [70]. In a study conducted by Modi et al. [71], RAPD marker analysis of plants raised in vitro from axillary nodes did not show any somaclonal variation. Ramírez-Mosqueda et al. [29] detected 89.6% genetic similarity between S. rebaudiana plantlets micropropagated in temporary immersion systems. All these results suggest that clonal propagation via stem-tip culture is an effective method of obtaining a population of uniform plants [67].

7. Elicitation

Elicitation is a common treatment used in in vitro cultures for obtaining secondary metabolites by using different elicitors [31,72]. A variety of microbial, physical and chemical factors may be considered as elicitors. Some of these elicitors act as signalling molecules, which produce engineered stress conditions in plant cells and initiate the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which directly or indirectly enhances the accumulation of secondary metabolites [31]. Several research articles on the positive effects of different elicitors on steviol glycosides biosynthesis in in vitro-cultivated S. rebaudiana are available in the literature [31].

7.1. Physical Elicitors

7.1.1. Light

Light is one of the major elicitors that alters the morphogenetic and biochemical responses of plants [73]. Although S. rebaudiana is a short-day plant, it was reported that a long-day (16 h) photoperiod induces vegetative growth, thereby significantly increasing leaf biomass and SGs content [8]. In addition to photoperiod, light intensity is also an important factor affecting plant growth and secondary metabolite production. Nakonechnaya et al. [74] established that an LED (light-emitting diode) light with an intensity of 75 and 230 μmol/(m2s) provided maximal values of morphometric and mesostructural parameters of Stevia plantlets raised in vitro. Several articles regarding the effect of different light spectra on in vitro cultivation of plant species are available in the literature. Ahmad et al. [73] investigated the effect of various spectral lights on biomass accumulation and secondary metabolite production in the callus culture of S. rebaudiana. Maximum callogenesis (92.73%) was induced by white light followed by yellow (88.34%), blue (76.4%), green (75.12%) and red (64.34%) lights. Callus fresh and dry weights decreased in the order of white-, red-, yellow-, green- and blue-light treatments. Blue light induced the highest phenol and flavonoid content and total antioxidant capacity, while treatment with red and green lights led to the highest 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity [73]. Another study performed with S. rebaudiana adventitious root cultures showed that violet light had a stimulating effect on biomass accumulation, while red light exhibited an inhibitory one. As in the above-mentioned study, the maximum accumulation of phenolic compounds was observed after treatment with blue light [75]. The red–blue spectrum treatment had an inhibitory effect on the shoot growth and led to the formation of shortened internodes as compared with the control (fluorescent white lamps). However, root formation increased under these conditions. Five days after returning the shoots to the control treatment, elongation of the newly formed internodes was observed. In response to monochromatic red LED light, shoots with elongated internodes were formed, while under blue LED light, more compact microshoots were observed. However, the multiplication rate was the same after both treatments. As regards the green LED and white fluorescent (control) lights, there have been no significant differences in the shoot height and multiplication coefficient [76].

7.1.2. Temperature

As an abiotic stress factor, temperature strongly influences plants’ growth and secondary metabolism accumulation [77]. Tissue cultures are extremely sensitive to variations in temperatures. The optimal temperatures for plant growth in vitro are species specific and usually higher than those observed for the growth of intact plants [78]. The literature data on the influence of temperature on growth and secondary metabolite production in Stevia cultivated in vitro are scarce. Mubarak et al. [79] studied the effect of various degrees of temperature (20, 25 and 30 °C) on the in vitro growth of the plant, as the highest number of shoots per explant was observed at 25 °C. Yang et al. [80] performed a pot study of S. rebaudiana for the evaluation of the influence of low (15 °C) and high (35 °C) temperatures on the transcript levels of fifteen SGs biosynthesis pathway genes. All the genes were transcribed maximally at 25 °C, while both low and high temperatures restrained their transcription.

7.2. Chemical Elicitors

Summarized data about the effect of certain elicitors on Stevia growth and secondary metabolite production are given in Table 1.

7.2.1. Plant Growth Regulators

Salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (Me-JA) and gibberellic acid enhanced the stevioside content in S. rebaudiana grown in vitro [40,81,82,83,84] (Table 1). Golkar et al. [40] evaluated the effect of different concentrations of salicylic acid (SA) (0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 mg/L) on callus growth and SGs production in the callus culture of Stevia. The addition of SA at a concentration of 0.75 mg/L resulted in the highest level of callus growth rate, callus diameter and relative callus fresh weight. The addition of 0.25 mg/L of SA to the MS medium led to the production of the highest amount of rebaudioside A (3.40 mg/g dry weight callus). Adventitious roots cultured in media supplemented with gibberellic acid (2 mg/L) accumulated SGs in high concentrations [85].

7.2.2. Complex Organic Extracts

Positive effects of certain growth additives such as alginate (ALG), casein hydrolysate (CH), coconut water (CW), malt extract (ME), yeast extract (YE) and chitosan (CHI) on plant growth and secondary metabolite production in S. rebaudiana cultured in vitro have been reported [82,86] (Table 1). Casein hydrolysate is a complex organic extract and can be a source of calcium, phosphate, several microelements, vitamins and, most importantly, a mixture of up to 18 amino acids [87]. The addition of casein hydrolysate to the woody plant medium (WPM) enhanced stevioside and rebaudioside A content in Stevia [82]. The stevioside content increased 8.38-fold (13.05 mg/g DW) with the treatment of 0.5 g/L CH compared to the control. Although a subsequent decrease in stevioside production was observed with concentrations of 1.0 and 2.0 g/L, both provided higher metabolite content than the control plants [82]. Casein hydrolysate was found to promote the accumulation of stevioside and rebaudioside A in the callus culture of S. rebaudiana [88]. The molecular structures of the active ingredients of YE are unknown, but it is known that they can elicit plant defense responses [89,90]. ALG is a polysaccharide present in the cell walls of brown algae. Bayraktar et al. [82] reported an increase in stevioside production from 1.56 mg/g dry weight (DW) to 14.69 and 14.54 mg/g DW in the in vitro Stevia plantlets exposed to 0.5 g/L ALG and 2.0 g/L YE, respectively. CW contains growth hormones, and its addition to the nutrient media improved Stevia shoot growth. The optimal concentration in which the maximum shoot length and the number of shoots were observed was 15%, whereas higher concentrations (20%) led to the formation of callus at the cut ends with the following decrease in the shoot multiplication rate [86]. ME is a source of carbohydrates, auxins and gibberellins. Lower concentrations of ME (0.025%, 0.05%) induced Stevia shoot bud initiation and multiplication, whereas higher doses (0.075%, 0.1%) reduced these parameters [86]. CHI is a linear polysaccharide known to induce an increase in the lignin biosynthesis and cell wall lignification of plants, resulting in better shoot growth and an increase in weight [82]. It is the main structural component of the cell wall of plant pathogen fungi, which mimics its effects and activates the biosynthesis of defense-related secondary metabolites in plants [91,92,93,94]. SGs are similar to other secondary plant metabolites in that they behave defensively by feeding deterrents or antimicrobial agents against specific herbivores, pests or pathogens [95,96,97]. The stevioside content was seen to increase in the shoots of S. rebaudiana grown in vitro in the presence of 50 and 100 μM CHI in the nutrient media, reaching 7.02 mg/g DW (4.51-fold higher than the control plants) at 100 μM [82].
Table
Table 1. Effect of certain substances on S. rebaudiana Bertoni growth and accumulation of bioactive compounds.
Table 1. Effect of certain substances on S. rebaudiana Bertoni growth and accumulation of bioactive compounds.
Type of Elicitors Used Effects References
Salicylic acid Promotion of callus growth and accumulation of rebaudioside A Golkar et al., 2019 [40]
Improvement of stevioside and rebaudioside A production and KA13H, UGT74G1 genes expression Tahmasi et al., 2017 [81]
Methyl jasmonate Enhancement of stevioside production in shoot cultures Bayraktar et al., 2018 [83]
Gibberellic acidOptimization of biomass production from adventitious root culture and accumulation of polyphenolics and SGsAhmad et al., 2020a [85]
Promotive role in enhancing stevioside content in calluses Hendawey and Abo El Fadl, 2014 [84]
Casein hydrolysate An increase in stevioside and rebaudioside A content in callus culture Hsing et al., 1983 [88]
Enhancement of in vitro shoot regeneration and multiplicationSridhar et al., 2014 [86]
Chitosan Acceleration of shoot production and biomass accumulation Bayraktar et al., 2016; Bayraktar et al., 2018 [82,83]
Alginate High stevioside accumulation Bayraktar et al., 2016 [82]
Yeast extract Improvement of stevioside production Bayraktar et al., 2016 [82]
Coconut water Enhancement of shoot growth and development Sridhar et al., 2014 [86]
Malt extract Induction of shoots and multiplication Sridhar et al., 2014 [86]
Proline Induction of callus growth and stevioside accumulation in callus culture and decrease in malondialdehyde content Hendawey and Abo El Fadl, 2014 [84]
Improvement of biomass yield and SGs production in the callus and suspension culturesGupta et al., 2015 [98]
Glutamine Induction of greenish, healthy nodular calli with embryogenic potential. Das and Mandal, 2010 [99]
Increase in shoot biomass and chlorophyll content Thilakavathy and Jagadeesan, 2017 [100]
Effect on UGT74G1 and UGT76G1 gene expression and steviol glycosides accumulationEsmaeili et al., 2018 [101]
Creatine lysinate Beneficial effects on growth parameters and phenol and flavonoid accumulation in in vitro cultivated plants Miladinova-Georgieva et al., 2022 [102]
Glucose Enhancement of stevioside content in callus cultures Hendawey and Abo El Fadl, 2014 [84]
Polyethylene glycolImprovement of biomass yield and SGs production in the callus and suspension culturesGupta et al., 2015 [98]
NaCl and Na2CO3Reduction in the growth and development of callus and suspension cultures; Increase in the concentration of SGsGupta et al., 2014 [103]
NaCl Increase of antioxidant capacity, hydroxycinnamic acid and total soluble sugar content in in vitro plantlets and up-regulation of several genes (CMS, CMK, HDR and UGT76G1) encoding key enzymes of the SGs biosynthetic pathwaysLucho et al., 2019 [104]

7.2.3. Amino Acids

Glutamic acid and proline play a promotive role in enhancing callus growth and stevioside content in Stevia callus culture and this was associated with a clear decrease in malondialdehyde content, which is used as a biomarker to measure oxidative stress [84]. Enhanced production of steviol glycosides (SGs) was observed in the callus and suspension culture of S. rebaudiana treated with proline [98]. Das and Mandal [99] found that the addition of glutamine (50 mg/L) to the nutrient medium produced greenish, healthy nodular calli with more embryogenic potential and less necrotic lesion in comparison with only the PGR-supplemented basal medium. In the same study, the effect of tryptophan (50 and 100 mg/L) was also investigated, but no satisfactory effect was observed at all. Thilakavathy and Jagadeesan [100] reported that the total biomass and chlorophyll content of S. rebaudiana increased by adding 100 mg/L glutamine in the culture medium. Furthermore, the presence of glutamine in the medium favored an increase in the shoot bud number per explant. Esmaeili et al. [101] have investigated the effect of different concentrations of glutamine (10, 20, 30 and 40 g/L) on the expression of UGT74G1 and UGT76G1 genes (genes that have important roles in the synthesis of stevioside and rebaudioside A) and stevioside and rebaudioside A accumulation in the leaves of Stevia under in vitro conditions. The highest level of expression for UGT74G1 was observed in plants grown on MS media without glutamine, while for UGT76G1, the addition of glutamine at concentrations of 2, 3 and 4% has a stimulatory effect. The highest amount of stevioside was accumulated in plants that were under the 3% glutamine treatment, while the highest rebaudioside A accumulation was observed under the 2% glutamine treatment. The lowest accumulation of stevioside and rebaudioside A was observed in plants grown on MS medium without glutamine.
The addition of creatine lysinate to the nutrient medium has a beneficial effect on the growth parameters and accumulation of phenols and flavonoids in in vitro-cultivated S. rebaudiana Bertoni [102].

7.3. Other Organic Components

There are previous studies on the promotive role of glucose and 2-acetooxybenzoic acid on callus growth and stevioside content in Stevia callus culture, and this effect has a been associated with a decrease in the malondialdehyde content [84]. Another study presented a positive effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on steviol glycoside (SG) production in the callus and suspension culture of S. rebaudiana [98].

Sodium Compounds

Stevia plants growing in vitro have also been studied for their adaptability to certain abiotic stress factors such as salinity or water stress [9]. The stress conditions created by sodium compounds (NaCl and Na2CO3) inhibited the growth of callus and suspension cultures, but significantly enhanced the accumulation of SGs [103]. The biomass growth decreased from 113.60 mg in the control to 93.66 mg (in 0.10% NaCl treatment) and 99.93 mg (in 0.025% Na2CO3 treatment). In callus, the quantity of SGs increased over five-fold from 0.27 (control) to 1.43 and 1.57% with 0.10% NaCl and 0.025% Na2CO3, respectively. In the case of the suspension culture, the same concentrations of NaCl and Na2CO3 increased the SG content from 1.36 (control) to 2.61 and 5.14%, respectively, on the 10th day. Treatment with NaCl increased the antioxidant capacity (according to the ferric reducing/antioxidant power—FRAP assay), hydroxycinnamic acid and total soluble sugar content of S. rebaudiana in vitro plantlets and led to the up-regulation of several genes (CMS, CMK, HDR and UGT76G1) encoding key enzymes of the steviol glycoside biosynthetic pathways [104].

8. Nanoparticles

Numerous reports indicate positive aspects of nanoparticle application in plant tissue culture [105]. Because of their size (between 1 and 100 nm), nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit unique physicochemical properties such as a large surface-area-to-volume ratio, the ability to engineer electron exchanges, special electronic and optical attributes and surface reactive capability [106,107,108]. Nanoparticles have been widely used to improve seed germination, plant growth and yield, secondary metabolites production and plant protection [105,106,108,109,110,111]. Furthermore, they find applications as disinfectants, nutrients and elicitors, as tools for genetic transformation, callus induction, organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis [112,113]. Nanoparticles exert their action through various pathways, such as their effects on ethylene, enzymes, nitrogen metabolism and light harvesting complex II (LHC II). No toxicity on plant growth was detected if the permissive concentration was considered [110] (Table 2).
A few studies on the effect of different nanoparticles on the growth and secondary metabolite production of Stevia in vitro have been reported. Hendawey et al. [10] found appropriate concentrations of Fe3O4NPs, CuONPs and SiO2NPs that positively affect antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT) activity and stevioside production in the Stevia callus culture. Ahmad et al. [121] investigated the influence of ZnO and CuONPs on in vitro root formation, non-enzymatic antioxidant activities and the production of SGs in in vitro-cultivated Stevia plants. The highest percentage of rooting, the greatest content of SGs (rebaudioside A and stevioside) and the highest total flavonoid content, total phenolic content and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl-free radical scavenging activity were observed at 2 mg/L of ZnO and 20 mg/L of CuO NPs. Both ZnO and CuO NPs at 200 mg/L and 2000 mg/L concentrations induced adverse effects on plant biomass, antioxidant activities and SG content. Hence, the biochemical and morphophysiological responses of Candyleaf were elicited as a defense against CuO and ZnO NPs applied under the threshold limit [121]. Javed et al. [116,117] investigated the effects of different concentrations (0, 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100 or 1000 mg/L) of ZnO (34 nm in size) and CuO (with an average size of 47 nm) nanoparticles on growth parameters, steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A and stevioside) production and antioxidant activities in S. rebaudiana Bertoni grown in vitro. The highest percentage of shoot formation, as well as a significant enhancement of steviol glycosides in micropropagated shoots, was observed at 1 mg/L of ZnO and 10 mg/L CuO NPs. The oxidative stress produced by CuO and ZnO nanoparticles on S. rebaudiana was affirmed by increased DPPH scavenging activity, total antioxidant capacity, total reducing power, total flavonoid content and total phenolic content, with increasing oxidative pressure and generation of ROS. However, the antioxidant activities, formation of secondary metabolites and physiological parameters showed a sudden decline after crossing the threshold of a 1 mg/L concentration of ZnONPs and falling to a minimum at 1000 mg/L, elucidating the maximum phytotoxic effect of ZnONPs at this concentration [117]. The highest amount of total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC), as well as the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and DPPH free radical scavenging activity in callus culture of Stevia, have been obtained at 100 mg/L of ZnONPs, whereas TPC, TAC, TRP (total reducing power) and DPPH free radical scavenging activity achieved the highest values at a 10 mg/L concentration of CuONPs. The highest TRP in the context of ZnO and the highest TFC regarding CuO have been achieved at 50 and 100 mg/L, respectively [123]. Ghazal et al. [118] reported that the addition of bimetallic alloys of gold and copper nanoparticles (AuCu NPs) to the liquid MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L NAA has a positive effect on the production of biomass and secondary metabolites in adventitious root cultures of S. rebaudiana. The maximum total phenolics content and total flavonoid content, as well as the maximum DPPH free radical scavenging activity, were displayed using AuCu NPs at a ratio of 1:3. A study by Khan et al. [122] indicated that lower concentrations of FeNPs (45 µg/L) had a positive influence on the morphological growth parameters of the plant species. At a higher dose (90 and 135 µg/L), FeNPs in culture media were found to be detrimental to growth characteristics and development. Furthermore, the stress caused by FeNPs at 135 µg/L in cultures produced higher levels of total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity. In addition, plants grown in the presence of FeNPs at 90 µg/L resulted in higher enzymatic antioxidant activities (SOD, POD, CAT and APX). Furthermore, exposure to a low dose of FeNPs (45 µg/L) exhibited the maximum amount of SGs (stevioside and rebaudioside A) as compared to high doses. The nodal explants of Stevia were cultured in vitro on an MS medium where the normal source of Zn was replaced with different concentrations of ZnNPs (50, 100, 200, 400 and 1000 mg/L) [114]. The ZnNPs showed potential toxicity to the plant, which was reflected in both the morphological data and the production of ROS scavenging enzymes under different treatment conditions. The 200 mg/L concentration of ZnNP showed lower toxicity symptoms. The phytotoxicity severity increased at a concentration of 400 mg/L and above with the highest toxicity at a 1000 mg/L concentration. The production of stevioside was significantly reduced when exposed to ZnNP in a concentration-dependent manner. The study showed the concentration-dependent phytotoxic effect of ZnNP on the physiology and stevioside production in Stevia [114]. A similar study was performed by Desai et al. [115] with MgNPs. Nodal explants of Stevia were cultured on the MS medium where the normal source of Mg+ was replaced with MgNPs (at 125, 250, 500, 750 and 1000 mg/L). An MS medium devoid of MgSO4.7H2O was used as a negative control. The authors revealed that Mg NPs are able to replace their bulk counterparts and effectively eliminate Mg+ deficiency in plants. The MgNPs improved the plant morphology (leaf length, leaf width, shoot length, the number of nodes per explant, internodal space and number of shoots per explant) as compared to the negative control. The activities of ROS scavenging enzymes (CAT, GPOX and SOD) increased in a concentration-dependent manner upon MgNPs treatment, as these activities were lower compared to plants grown on Mg+-deficient media and higher than those reported with positive control (MS basal medium). An Mg+ deficiency leads to a drastic reduction in stevioside content, whereas the application of MgNPs enhances it in a concentration-dependent manner, with the maximum stevioside content at 1000 mg/L of MgNPs [115]. In S. rebaudiana, high doses of AgNPs were reported to accumulate in plant cells and tissues [124]. AgNPs were shown to be present in epidermal stem cells, within vascular bundles and in intermembrane spaces [119]. In leaves, they were observed in ribs and stomata. An increase in Ag content in tissues was observed as AgNPs concentrations in the culture medium increased [119]. Castro-González et al. [119] conducted a study to determine the response of S. rebaudiana B. to different concentrations of silver nanoparticles (0, 12.5, 25, 50,100 and 200 mg/L AgNPs) added to the nutrient medium. The lowest AgNP concentrations (12.5 mg/L) promoted the greatest shoot production and length per explant. An increase in chlorophyll a, b and total contents was observed after all treatments with AgNPs. The dry matter gradually increases from 25 mg/L of AgNPs, obtaining the highest values with 100 and 200 mg/L AgNPs concentrations. Golkar et al. [40] evaluated the effect of different concentrations of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (15, 30, 45 and 60 mg/L) on callus growth and SGs production in the callus culture of Stevia. The addition of AgNPs at a concentration of 45 mg/L led to the highest amount of stevioside (32.34 mg/g dry weight callus). Ramezani et al. [120] studied the effect of AgNPs at various concentrations (0, 10, 20 and 40 mM) on the transcription of key gene levels in the biosynthesis of rebaudioside and stevioside glycosides, including UGT85C2 (UDP-glycosyltransferases), KAH (Kaurenoic acid-13 hydroxylase), UGT74G1 and UGT76G1 in Stevia using real-time PCR assays. UGT85C2 demonstrated the highest transcriptional level changes in plants treated with silver nanoparticles. The plants treated with silver nanoparticles at concentrations of 10 and 20 mM showed a lower gene expression than the control plant, but the plant treated with silver nanoparticles at a 40 mM concentration showed significantly higher gene expression than the control samples. The results suggested that treatment with AgNPs at 40 mM leads to similar positive effects on the transcription of all genes. HPLC results also revealed that the plants treated with 40 mM AgNPs contain a higher glycosides content compared to the control sample. Thus, this experiment suggests that AgNPs can act as a strong amplifier of the transcriptional trigger for steviol glycoside biosynthesis pathway genes, which have the potential to control the production of steviol glycosides positively [120].
Sichanova et al. [125] evaluated the impact of aminoacid nanofibers carriers of 1% and 2% colloidal silver (NF-1% Ag and NF-2% Ag) on in vitro cultivation and steviol glycoside content of S. rebaudiana Bertoni. The research showed a hormetic effect of the nanofibers—at low concentrations, from 1 to 50 mg/L, stimulation of plant growth was observed, while at high concentrations (100 mg/L), they possessed a harmful effect. The highest stevioside content was measured in plants treated with 100 mg/L NF-1% Ag.

9. Effect of Elicitors on Antioxidant Activity in S. rebaudiana

S. rebaudiana exhibits strong antioxidant potential due to the presence of various enzymatic and non-enzymatic molecules with antioxidant functions. The major enzymatic components involved in protecting plant cells from oxidative stress are superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) [126]. The non-enzymatic antioxidants in which Stevia is rich are phenolics, flavonoids, diterpene glycosides, tannins and anthocyanins [127]. The first evaluation of the antioxidant potential of Stevia in vitro was performed by Sadhana et al. [128] who worked with leaf and callus extracts. The total phenolic content was 25.18 mg/g DW (dry weight) for leaves and 35.86 mg/g DW for callus. The flavonoid content was 21.73 and 31.99 mg/g in the leaf and callus, respectively. Total antioxidant activity measured by the ferric-reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was equivalent to 25.70 and 35.16 mg/g DW ascorbic acid in water and methanolic extract of the leaves, respectively. In the case of callus, it was 25.11 mg/g DW for the water extract and 32.32 mg/g DW for the methanolic extract. The percent inhibition of the DPPH radical with the water extract of leaves and callus was 39.86% and 55.42%, respectively, whereas it was 33.17% and 56.82% for the methanolic extract of leaves and callus, respectively. Comparing the antioxidant capacity of the leaf extract of Stevia grown in vitro with that from field-adapted ex vitro plants, Zayova et al. [129] established that the latter possess higher amounts of water-soluble antioxidants, phenols and flavonoids, hence higher total antioxidant capacity (expressed as a percentage inhibition of the free radical DPPH) was measured. This can be explained by the greater variety of stress factors to which field-grown plants were exposed in comparison with plants grown under controlled in vitro conditions. The antioxidant activity of the in vitro-cultivated plants can be influenced by the modulation of culture conditions and medium composition [130]. The amount of proline, an excellent stress indicator, and the activity of antioxidant enzymes SOD, CAT and APX increased in Stevia callus under fluoride-induced stress [131]. Radić et al. [130] evaluated the effect of different pH levels (4.6, 5.8 and 7.4) of the culture medium on the accumulation of secondary metabolites and free radical scavenging activity in S. rebaudiana. The maximum accumulation of total phenols and total flavonoids, as well as the highest values of DPPH radical inhibition, were recorded in the leaves and roots of the plants grown on a medium with a pH value of 4.6.
A study conducted by Miladinova-Georgieva et al. [102] shows a favorable effect of creatine and creatine lysinate on the physiological processes of in vitro-cultivated S. rebaudiana Bertoni. The activities of antioxidant enzymes CAT, APX and GPX decreased after treatment with most of the studied concentrations of these amino acids, while SOD activity and the content of lipid-soluble antioxidants increased gradually with increasing concentrations of creatine and creatine lysinate (1, 5 and 10 mg/L). The number of water-soluble antioxidants increased at the highest concentration of the amino acids (10 mg/L). The results obtained by the FRAP method led authors to assume that lysine in a higher concentration suppresses the effect of creatine—creatine increases the antioxidant activity measured by the FRAP method and lysine returns it closer to the control. The DPPH assay showed that creatine alone and in combination with lysine as a salt did not alter the overall antioxidant status of the plant.

10. Conclusions

Plant tissue culture techniques are increasingly used for the mass propagation of S. rebaudiana Bert. Cooperative applications of both traditional and biotechnological tools enable the generation of plants with desired agronomic traits such as disease resistance, improved biomass and high glycoside content. In recent years, many efforts have been made to clarify the role of nanoparticles as a novel elicitor for plants’ primary and secondary metabolism. There are different and often conflicting reports on the effect of NPs on the growth and development of various plant species. Many questions concerning the fate and toxicity of NPs in plant cells remain unsolved.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: K.M.-G. and M.G.; original draft preparation: K.M.-G. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, M.G., I.S., K.M.-G., M.P., E.K. and M.S.; project administration, M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted with financial support from the National Science Fund at the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, Project KΠ-06-H56/8 12.11.21.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

2:4-D—2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; ALG—alginate; APX—ascorbate peroxidase; BAP—6-benzyl aminopurine; CAT—catalase; CH—casein hydrolysate; CHI—chitosan; CW—cococnut water; DPPH—2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl; DW—dry weight; FW—fresh weight; FRAP—ferric reducing/antioxidant power; GA3—gibberellic acid; GPX—guaiacol peroxidase; GR—glutathione reductase; IAA—indole-3-acetic acid; HPLC—high-performance liquid chromatography; iP—N6-(2-isopentenyl)-adenine; ISSR—inter simple sequence repeat; Kn—kinetin; LED—light-emitting diode; LS—Linsmaier and Skoog; ME—malt extract; Me-JA—methyl jasmonate; MS- Murashige and Skoog; NAA—α-naphthalene acetic acid; NPs—nanoparticles; PGRs—plant growth regulators; RAPD—Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA; ROS—reactive oxygen species; SA—salicylic acid; SGs-steviol glycosides; SOD—superoxide dismutase; TAC—total antioxidant capacity; TFC—total flavonoid content; TPC—total phenolic content; TRP—total reducing power; WPM—woody plant medium; YE—yeast extract; Z—zeatin.

References

  1. Yadav, A.K.; Singh, S.; Dhyani, D.; Ahuja, P.S. A review on the improvement of stevia [Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni)]. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 91, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peteliuk, V.; Rybchuk, L.; Bayliak, M.; Storey, K.B.; Lushchak, O. Natural sweetener Stevia rebaudiana: Functionalities, health benefits and potential risks. EXCLI J. 2021, 20, 1412–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jahan, M.T.; Islam, M.R.; Roy, P.K.; Mamun, A.N.K.; Islam, M.A. In vitro clonal propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni through node and shoot tip culture. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 2014, 23, 61–65. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lewis, W.H.; Rawat, A.S.; Pharswan, A.S.; Nautiyal, M.C.; Kostermans, A.J.G.H. Notes on economic plants. Econ. Bot. 1992, 46, 336–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, J.; Li, S.F.Y. Separation and determination of Stevia sweeteners by capillary electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1995, 18, 1703–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chalapathi, M.V.; Thimmegowda, S.; Sridhara, S.; Parama, V.R.; Prasad, T.G. Natural non-calorie sweetener stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni)-A future crop of India. Crop Res.-Hisar 1997, 14, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ahmed, M.B.; Salahin, M.; Karim, R.; Razvy, M.A.; Hannan, M.M.; Sultana, R.; Islam, R. An efficient method for in vitro clonal propagation of a newly introduced sweetener plant (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.) in Bangladesh. Am.-Eurasian J. Sci. Res. 2007, 2, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ceunen, S.; Geuns, J.M. Influence of photoperiodism on the spatio-temporal accumulation of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Plant Sci. 2013, 198, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Libik-Konieczny, M.; Capecka, E.; Tuleja, M.; Konieczny, R. Synthesis and production of steviol glycosides: Recent research trends and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 3883–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hendawey, M.H.; El-Fadl, R.E.A.; El-Din, T.A.S. Biochemical Role of Some Nanoparticles in the Production of Active Constituents in Stevia Rebaudiana L. Callus. Life Sci. J. 2015, 12, 144–156. [Google Scholar]
  11. Geuns, J.M. Stevioside. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bhosle, S. Commercial cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana. Agrobios Newslett. 2004, 3, 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sumon, M.H.; Mostofa, M.; Jahan, M.S.; Kayesh, M.E.H.; Haque, M.A. Comparative efficacy of powdered form of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) leaves and glimepiride in induced diabetic rats. Bangl. J. Vet. Med. 2008, 6, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bespalhok-Filho, J.C.; Hattori, K. Embryogenic callus formation and histological studies from Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni floret explants. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 1997, 9, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  15. Handro, W.; Ferreira, C.M. Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni: Production of Natural Sweeteners. In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants II; Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry; Bajaj, Y.P.S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989; Volume 7, pp. 468–487. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wolwer-Rieck, U. The leaves of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni), their constituents and the analyses thereof: A review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Razak, U.N.A.A.; Ong, C.B.; Yu, T.S.; Lau, L.K. In vitro micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in Malaysia. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2014, 57, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Momtazi-Borojeni, A.A.; Esmaeili, S.A.; Abdollahi, E.; Sahebkar, A. A review on the pharmacology and toxicology of steviol glycosides extracted from Stevia rebaudiana. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1616–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruiz-Ruiz, J.C.; Moguel-Ordonez, Y.B.; Segura-Campos, M.R. Biological activity of Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni and their relationship to health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 57, 2680–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumari, A.; Kumar, V.; Malhotra, N. Chapter 11—Stevia rebaudiana. In Himalayan Medicinal Plants—Advances in Botany, Production & Research; Malhotra, N., Singh, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 199–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Megeji, N.W.; Kumar, J.K.; Sing, V.; Kaul, V.K.; Ahuja, P.S. Introducing Stevia rebaudiana, a natural zero-calorie sweetener. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88, 801–804. Available online: http://ihbt.csircentral.net/id/eprint/685 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  22. Jain, P.; Kachhwaha, S.; Kothari, S. Improved micropropagation protocol and enhancement in biomass and chlorophyll content in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni by using high copper levels in the culture medium. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 119, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Felippe, G.M.; Lucas, N.M.C. Estudo da viabilidade dos frutos de Stevia rebaudiana Bert. Hoehnea 1971, 1, 95–105, (In Portuguese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  24. Toffler, F.; Orio, O.A. Acceni sulla pin ata tropicale ‘Kaa-he-e’ ou ‘erba dolce’. Rev. Soc. Sci. Aliment 1981, 4, 225–230. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tadhani, M.B.; Subhash, R. Preliminary studies on Stevia rebaudiana leaves: Proximal composition, mineral analysis and phytochemical screening. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2006, 6, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ramírez-Mosqueda, M.A.; Iglesias-Andreu, L.G. Direct organogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni using thin cell layer (TCL) method. Sugar Tech 2016, 18, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nakamura, S.; Tamura, Y. Variation in the main glycosides of Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni). Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 1985, 29, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sakaguchi, M.; Kan, T. Japanese researches on Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and stevioside. Cienc. Cult. 1982, 34, 235–248. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramírez-Mosqueda, M.A.; Iglesias-Andreu, L.G.; Ramírez-Madero, G.; Hernández-Rincón, E.U. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bert. in temporary immersion systems and evaluation of genetic fidelity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 106, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hussain, A.; Qarshi, I.A.; Nazir, H.; Ullah, I. Plant tissue culture: Current status and opportunities. Chapter 1. In Recent Advances in Plant In Vitro Culture; Leva, A., Rinaldi, L., Eds.; InTech Open: London, UK, 2012; Volume 6, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kazmi, A.; Khan, M.A.; Mohammad, S.; Ali, A.; Kamil, A.; Arif, M.; Ali, H. Elicitation directed growth and production of steviol glycosides in the adventitious roots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Handro, W.; Hell, K.G.; Kerbauy, G. Tissue culture of Stevia rebaudiana, a sweetening plant. Planta Med. 1977, 32, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.W.; Chang, W.C. In vitro plant regeneration from leaf explants of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 1979, 93, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y.; Hsing, Y.; Chang, W. Clonal propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni through axillary shoot proliferation in vitro. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 1981, 22, 7–62. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wada, Y.; Tamura, T.; Kodama, T.; Yamaki, T.; Uchida, Y. Callus cultures and morphogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. JOCS 1981, 30, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Tamura, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Fukui, H.; Tabata, M. Clonal propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni by stem-tip culture. Plant Cell Rep. 1984, 3, 183–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sivaram, L.; Mukundar, U. In vitro Culture Studies on Stevia rebaudiana. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 2003, 39, 520–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Das, K.; Dang, R.; Rajasekharan, P.E. Establishment and maintenance of callus of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni under aseptic environment. Nat. Prod. Radiance 2006, 5, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  39. Röck-Okuyucu, B.; Bayraktar, M.; Akgun, I.H.; Gurel, A. Plant growth regulator effects on in vitro propagation and stevioside production in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Hort. Sci. 2016, 51, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Golkar, P.; Moradi, M.; Garousi, G.A. Elicitation of Stevia glycosides using salicylic acid and silver nanoparticles under callus culture. Sugar Tech 2019, 21, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Singh, M.; Saharan, V.; Dayma, J.; Rajpurohit, D.; Sen, Y.; Sharma, A. In vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni): An overview. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017, 6, 1010–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bhatia, S.; Bera, T.; Bhatia, S.; Sharma, K.; Dahiya, R. Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. In Modern Applications of Plant Biotechnology in Pharmaceutical Sciences; Bera, T., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 6, pp. 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Desai, P.; Desai, S.; Rafaliya, R.; Patil, G. Plant tissue culture: Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. In Advances in Plant Tissue Culture; Chandra Rai, A., Kumar, A., Modi, A., Singh, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 109–130. [Google Scholar]
  44. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zayova, E.; Trendafil, N.; Stancheva, I. Callus via shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Proc. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 2022, 75, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferreira, C.M.; Handro, W. Production, maintenance and plant regeneration from cell suspension cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni. Plant Cell Rep. 1988, 7, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chang Yeon, Y.; Young Am., C. In vitro Propagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Korean J. Crop Sci. 1984, 29, 102–107. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ferreira, C.M.; Handro, W. Some morphogenetic responses in leaf explants of Stevia rebaudiana cultured in vitro. Rev. Bras. Bot. 1987, 10, 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  49. Flachsland, E.; Mroginski, L.; Davina, J. Regeneration of plants from anthers of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (Compositae) cultivated in vitro. Biocell 1996, 20, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ahmad, N.; Fazal, H.; Zamir, R.; Khalil, S.A.; Abbasi, B.H. Callogenesis and shoot organogenesis from flowers of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). Sugar Tech 2011, 13, 174–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Godoy-Hernández, G.; Vázquez-Flota, F.A. Estimation of Cell Division and Cell Expansion. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Plant Cell Culture Protocols, 2nd ed.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M., Vázquez-Flota, F., Eds.; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2006; Volume 318, pp. 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  52. Gunasena, M.D.; Senarath, W.T.P.S.K. In vitro plant regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana through indirect organogenesis. Int. J. Bot. Stud. 2019, 4, 199–203. Available online: http://dr.lib.sjp.ac.lk/handle/123456789/10241 (accessed on 3 December 2019).
  53. Khalil, S.A.; Zamir, R.; Ahmad, N. Selection of suitable propagation method for consistent plantlets production in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 21, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Linsmaier, E.M.; Skoog, F. Organic growth factor requirements of tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 1967, 51, 100–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mathur, S.; Shekhawat, G.S. Establishment and characterization of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) cell suspension culture: An in vitro approach for production of stevioside. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hwang, S.J. Rapid in vitro propagation and enhanced stevioside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. J. Plant Biol. 2006, 49, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Thiyagarajan, M.; Venkatachalam, P. Large scale in vitro propagation of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert) for commercial application: Pharmaceutically important and antidiabetic medicinal herb. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 37, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khan, A.; Jayanthi, M.; Gantasala, N.P.; Bhooshan, N.; Rao, U. A rapid and efficient protocol for in vitro multiplication of genetically uniform Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 54, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Gamborg, O.L.; Miller, R.; Ojima, K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1968, 50, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Miyagawa, H.; Fujioka, N.; Kohda, H.; Yamasaki, K.; Taniguchi, K.; Tanaka, R. Studies on the tissue culture of Stevia rebaudiana and its components; (II). Induction of shoot primordia. Planta Med. 1986, 4, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Akbari, F.; Arminian, A.; Kahrizi, D.; Fazeli, A. Effect of nitrogen sources on some morphological characteristics of in vitro Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2017, 63, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Larkin, P.J.; Scowcroft, W.R. Somaclonal variation—A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 1981, 60, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saker, M.M.; Bekheet, S.A.; Taha, H.S.; Fahmy, A.S.; Moursy, H.A. Detection of somaclonal variations in tissue culture-derived date palm plants using isoenzyme analysis and RAPD fingerprints. Biol. Plant 2020, 43, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Martins, M.; Sarmento, D.; Oliveira, M. Genetic stability of micropropagated almond plantlets as assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 23, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. George, E.F.; Sherrington, P.D. Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture; Exegetics Ltd.: Eversley, UK, 1984; pp. 39–71. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tamura, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Fukui, H.; Tabata, M. Comparison of Stevia plants grown from seeds, cuttings and stem tip cultures for growth and sweet diterpene glycosides. Plant Cell Rep. 1984, 3, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ostry, M.E.; Hacket, W.; Michler, C.; Serres, R.; Mccown, B. Influence of regeneration method and tissue culture on the frequency of somatic variation in Populus to infection by Septoria musiva. Plant Sci. 1994, 97, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Singh, P.; Dwivedi, P.; Atri, N. In vitro shoot multiplication of stevia and assessment of stevioside content and genetic fidelity of the regenerates. Sugar Tech. 2014, 6, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moktaduzzaman, M.; Mahbubur Rahman, S.M. Regeneration of Stevia rebaudiana and analysis of somaclonal variation by RAPD. Biotechnology 2009, 8, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Soliman, H.I.A.; Metwali, E.M.R.; Almaghrabi, O.A.H. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and assessment of genetic stability of in vitro regenerated plants using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Modi, A.R.; Sharma, V.; Patil, G.; Singh, A.S.; Subhash, N.; Kumar, N. Micropropagation and biomass production of true-to-type Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1391, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jadczak, P.; Kulpa, D.; Bihun, M.; Przewodowski, W. Positive effect of AgNPs and AuNPs in in vitro cultures of Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2019, 139, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ahmad, N.; Rab, A.; Ahmad, N. Light-induced biochemical variations in secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity in callus cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016, 154, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nakonechnaya, O.; Gafitskaya, I.; Burkovskaya, E.; Khrolenko, Y.; Grishchenko, O.; Zhuravlev, Y.; Subbotin, E.; Kulchin, Y. Effect of light intensity on the morphogenesis of Stevia rebaudiana under in vitro conditions. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 66, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Idrees, M.; Sania, B.; Hafsa, B.; Kumari, S.; Khan, H.; Fazal, H.; Ahmad, I.; Akbar, F.; Ahmad, N.; Ali, S.; et al. Spectral lights trigger biomass accumulation and production of antioxidant secondary metabolites in adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). C. R. Biol. 2018, 341, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shulgina, A.A.; Kalashnikova, E.A.; Tarakanov, I.G.; Kirakosyan, R.N.; Cherednichenko, M.Y.; Polivanova, O.B.; Baranova, E.N.; Khaliluev, M.R. Influence of light conditions and medium composition on morphophysiological characteristics of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in vitro and in vivo. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shamloo, M.; Babawale, E.A.; Furtado, A.; Henry, R.J.; Eck, P.K.; Jones, P.J.H. Effects of genotype and temperature on accumulation of plant secondary metabolites in Canadian and Australian wheat grown under controlled environments. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. De Capite, L. Action of Light and Temperature on Growth of Plant Tissue Cultures In vitro. Am. J. Bot. 1955, 42, 869–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mubarak, M.H.; Belal, A.H.; Geddawy, I.M.; Eman, I.; Nasr, M.I. Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana in vitro. In Proceedings of the Meeting the Challenges of Sugar Crops & Integrated Industries in Developing Countries, Al Arish, Egypt, 11–14 September 2008; pp. 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, Y.; Huang, S.; Han, Y.; Yuan, H.; Gu, C.; Wang, Z. Environmental cues induce changes of steviol glycosides contents and transcription of corresponding biosynthetic genes in Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 86, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tahmasi, S.; Garoosi, G.; Ahmadi, J.; Farjaminezhad, R. Effect of salicylic acid on stevioside and rebaudioside A production and transcription of biosynthetic genes in in vitro culture of Stevia rebaudiana. Iran. J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2017, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  82. Bayraktar, M.; Naziri, E.; Akgun, I.H.; Karabey, F.; Ilhan, E.; Akyol, B.; Gurel, A. Elicitor induced stevioside production, in vitro shoot growth, and biomass accumulation in micropropagated Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 2016, 127, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bayraktar, M.; Naziri, E.; Karabey, F.; Akgun, I.H.; Bedir, E.; Bärbel, R.O.; Gürel, A. Enhancement of stevioside production by using biotechnological approach in in vitro culture of Stevia rebaudiana. Int. J. Second. Metab. 2018, 5, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Hendawey, M.H.; Abo El Fadl, R.E. Biochemical studies on the production of active constituents in Stevia rebaudiana L. callus. Glob. J. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2014, 9, 76–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahmad, A.; Ali, H.; Khan, H.; Begam, A.; Khan, S.; Ali, S.S.; Abbasi, B.H. Effect of gibberellic acid on production of biomass, polyphenolics and steviol glycosides in adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). Plants 2020, 9, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Sridhar, T.; Aswath, C. Influence of additives on enhanced in vitro shoot multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.)—An important anti diabetic medicinal plant. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. George, E.F.; Hall, M.A.; Klerk, G.J.D. The components of plant tissue culture media I: Macro-and micro-nutrients. In Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture; George, E.F., Hall, M.A., de Klerk, G.J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 65–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hsing, Y.I.; Su, W.F.; Chang, W.C. Accumulation of stevioside andrebaudioside A in callus culture of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 1983, 24, 115–119. [Google Scholar]
  89. Angelova, Z.; Georgiev, S.; Roos, W. Elicitation of plants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2006, 20, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Baenas, N.; García-Viguera, C.; Moreno, D.A. Elicitation: A tool for enriching the bioactive composition of foods. Molecules 2014, 19, 13541–13563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Benhamou, N.; Thériault, G. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1992, 41, 33–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, C.H.; Fevereiro, P.S.; He, G.; Chen, Z. Enhanced paclitaxel productivity and release capacity of Taxus chinensis cell suspension cultures adapted to chitosan. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tocci, N.; Ferrari, F.; Santamaria, A.R.; Valletta, A.; Rovardi, I.; Pasqua, G. Chitosan enhances xanthone production in Hypericum perforatum subsp. angustifolium cell cultures. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wiktorowska, E.; Długosz, M.; Janiszowska, W. Significant enhancement of oleanolic acid accumulation by biotic elicitors in cell suspension cultures of Calendula officinalis L. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Nanayakkara, N.P.; Klocke, J.A.; Compadre, C.M.; Hussain, R.A.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D. Characterization and feeding deterrent effects on the aphid, Schizaphis graminum, of some derivatives of the sweet compounds, stevioside and rebaudioside A. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Brandle, J.E.; Starratt, A.N.; Gijzen, M. Stevia rebaudiana: Its agricultural, biological, and chemical properties. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1998, 78, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Richman, A.S.; Gijzen, M.; Starratt, A.N.; Yang, Z.; Brandle, J.E. Diterpene synthesis in Stevia rebaudiana: Recruitment and up-regulation of key enzymes from the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway. Plant J. 1999, 19, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gupta, P.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, S. Biomass yield and steviol glycoside production in callus and suspension culture of Stevia rebaudiana treated with proline and polyethylene glycol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Das, A.; Mandal, N. Enhanced development of embryogenic callus in Stevia rebaudiana Bert. by additive and amino acids. Biotechnology 2010, 9, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Thilakavathy, R.; Jagadeesan, M. Caulogenesis and chlorophyll content in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert) Bertoni by using glutamine in the culture medium. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 1961–1963. Available online: https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=ART20173663 (accessed on 1 May 2017).
  101. Esmaeili, F.; Ghaheri, M.; Kahrizi, D.; Mansouri, M.; Safavi, S.M.; Ghorbani, T.; Vaziri, S. Effects of various glutamine concentrations on gene expression and steviol glycosides accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2018, 64, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Miladinova-Georgieva, K.; Geneva, M.; Petrova, M.; Kirova, E.; Vezenkov, L. Effect of creatine and creatine lysinate on the in vitro cultivation and antioxidant potential of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and Leontopodium alpinum Cass. Res. J. Biotech. 2022, 17, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gupta, P.; Sharma, S.; Saxena, S. Effect of salts (NaCl and Na2CO3) on callus and suspension culture of Stevia rebaudiana for Steviol glycoside production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 2894–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lucho, S.R.; do Amaral, M.N.; Auler, P.A.; Bianchi, V.J.; Ferrer, M.A.; Calderón, A.A.; Braga, E.J.B. Salt stress-induced changes in in vitro cultured Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Effect on metabolite contents, antioxidant capacity and expression of steviol glycosides-related biosynthetic genes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 1341–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, D.H.; Gopal, J.; Sivanesan, I. Nanomaterials in plant tissue culture: The disclosed and undisclosed. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 36492–36505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Bayda, S.; Adeel, M.; Tuccinardi, T.; Cordani, M.; Rizzolio, F. The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: From chemical–physical applications to nanomedicine. Molecules 2019, 25, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Salachna, P.; Byczyn’ska, A.; Zawadzin’ska, A.; Piechocki, R.; Mizielin´ska, M. Stimulatory effect of silver nanoparticles on the growth and flowering of potted oriental lilies. Agronomy 2019, 9, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Rahmawati, M.; Mahfud, C.; Risuleo, G.; Jadid, N. Nanotechnology in plant metabolite improvement and in animal welfare. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, P.; Lombi, E.; Zjao, F.J.; Kopittke, P.M. Nanotechnology: A new opportunity in plant sciences. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sarmast, M.K.; Salehi, H. Silver nanoparticles: An influential element in plant nanobiotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 2016, 58, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ruttkay-Nedecky, B.; Krystofova, O.; Nejdl, L.; Adam, V. Nanoparticles based on essential metals and their phytotoxicity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 15, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Álvarez, A.; Fernández, L.; Gutiérrez, D.; Iglesias, B.; Rodríguez, A.; García, P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals: Latest trends and treatments based on bacteriophages. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01006-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tariq, A.; Ilyas, S.; Naz, S. Nanotechnology and plant tissue culture. In Nanoagronomy; Javad, S., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Desai, C.V.; Desai, H.B.; Suthar, K.P.; Singh, D.; Patel, R.M.; Taslim, A. Phytotoxicity of zinc nanoparticles and its influence on stevioside production in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Appl. Biol. Res 2015, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Desai Heta, B.; Desai Charmi, V.; Desai Charmi, P.; Singh, D.; Suthar, H. Effect of magnesium nanoparticles on physiology and stevioside in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Eur. J. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 4, 642–646. [Google Scholar]
  116. Javed, R.; Mohamed, A.; Yücesan, B.; Gürel, E.; Kausar, R.; Zia, M. CuO nanoparticles significantly influence in vitro culture, steviol glycosides, and antioxidant activities of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2017, 131, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Javed, R.; Usman, M.; Yücesan, B.; Zia, M.; Gürel, E. Effect of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on physiology and steviol glycosides production in micropropagated shoots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 110, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ghazal, B.; Saif, S.; Farid, K.; Khan, A.; Rehman, S.; Reshma, A.; Fazal, H.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Rahman, L.; et al. Stimulation of secondary metabolites by copper and gold nanoparticles in submerge adventitious root cultures of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.). IET Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 12, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Castro-González, C.G.; Sánchez-Segura, L.; Gómez-Merino, F.C.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Exposure of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana B.) to silver nanoparticles in vitro: Transport and accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Ramezani, M.; Asghari, S.; Gerami, M.; Ramezani, F.; Abdolmaleki, M.K. Effect of silver nanoparticle treatment on the expression of key genes involved in glycosides biosynthetic pathway in Stevia rebaudiana B. plant. Sugar Tech 2020, 22, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ahmad, M.A.; Javed, R.; Adeel, M.; Rizwan, M.; Ao, Q.; Yang, Y. Engineered ZnO and CuO nanoparticles ameliorate morphological and biochemical response in tissue culture regenerants of candy leaf (Stevia rebaudiana). Molecules 2020, 25, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Khan, M.A.; Ali, A.; Mohammad, S.; Ali, H.; Khan, T.; Mashwani, Z.; Jan, A.; Ahmad, P. Iron nano modulated growth and biosynthesis of steviol glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 143, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Javed, R.; Yucesan, B.; Zia, M.; Gurel, E. Elicitation of secondary metabolites in callus cultures of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni Grown Under ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles Stress. Sugar Tech 2018, 20, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kruszka, D.; Sawikowska, A.; Kamalabai Selvakesavan, R.; Krajewski, P.; Kachlicki, P.; Franklin, G. Silver nanoparticles affect phenolic and phytoalexin composition of Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 135361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sichanova, M.; Geneva, M.; Petrova, M.; Miladinova-Georgieva, K.; Kirova, E.; Nedev, T.; Tsekova, D.; Iwanov, I.; Dochev, K.; Ivanova, V.; et al. Improvement of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni in vitro propagation and steviol glycoside content using aminoacid silver nanofibers. Plants 2022, 11, 2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of Amaranthus tricolor. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Ameer, K.; Jiang, G.H.; Amir, R.M.; Eun, J.B. Antioxidant potential of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni). In Pathology; Preedy, V.R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; Chapter 33; pp. 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sadhana, M.; Patel, V.; Subhash, R. In vitro antioxidant activities of Stevia rebaudiana leaves and callus. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zayova, E.; Stancheva, I.; Geneva, M.; Petrova, M.; Dimitrova, L. Antioxidant activity of in vitro propagated Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni plants of different origins. Turk. J. Biol. 2013, 37, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Radić, S.; Vujčić, V.; Glogoški, M.; Radić-Stojković, M. Influence of pH and plant growth regulators on secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of Stevia rebaudiana (Bert). Period. Biol. 2016, 118, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dwivedi, S.; Alam, A.; Shekhawat, G.S.; Sharma, V.; Kumari, J. Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Behaviour of Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni Against Fluoride Induced Stress. Int. J. Sci. Knowl. 2016, 4, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 2. Types and optimal concentrations of nanoparticles used for enhancement of the growth and secondary metabolite production of Stevia grown in vitro.
Table 2. Types and optimal concentrations of nanoparticles used for enhancement of the growth and secondary metabolite production of Stevia grown in vitro.
NanoparticlesOptimal ConcentrationReferences
Fe3O4 NPs
CuO NPs
SiO2 NPs		 Hendawey et al., 2015 [10]
Zn NPs200 mg/LDesai et al., 2015 [114]
Mg NPs1000 mg/LDesai et al., 2017 [115]
CuO NPs10 mg/L Javed et al., 2017a [116]
ZnO NPs1 mg/LJaved et al., 2017b [117]
AuCu NPs Ghazal et al., 2018 [118]
Ag NPs45 mg/LGolkar et al., 2019 [40]
Ag NPs100 mg/L; 200 mg/LCastro-González et al., 2019 [119]
Ag NPs40 mMRamezani et al., 2020 [120]
ZnO
CuONPs		2 mg/L
20 mg/L		Ahmad et al., 2020b [121]
Fe NPs45 μg/LKhan et al., 2020 [122]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miladinova-Georgieva, K.; Geneva, M.; Stancheva, I.; Petrova, M.; Sichanova, M.; Kirova, E. Effects of Different Elicitors on Micropropagation, Biomass and Secondary Metabolite Production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—A Review. Plants 2023, 12, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010153

AMA Style

Miladinova-Georgieva K, Geneva M, Stancheva I, Petrova M, Sichanova M, Kirova E. Effects of Different Elicitors on Micropropagation, Biomass and Secondary Metabolite Production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—A Review. Plants. 2023; 12(1):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miladinova-Georgieva, Kamelia, Maria Geneva, Ira Stancheva, Maria Petrova, Mariana Sichanova, and Elisaveta Kirova. 2023. "Effects of Different Elicitors on Micropropagation, Biomass and Secondary Metabolite Production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—A Review" Plants 12, no. 1: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010153

APA Style

Miladinova-Georgieva, K., Geneva, M., Stancheva, I., Petrova, M., Sichanova, M., & Kirova, E. (2023). Effects of Different Elicitors on Micropropagation, Biomass and Secondary Metabolite Production of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni—A Review. Plants, 12(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop