Next Article in Journal
Role of NPR1 in Systemic Acquired Stomatal Immunity
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Heterosis to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Popcorn Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silicon Differently Affects Apoplastic Binding of Excess Boron in Wheat and Sunflower Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular, Metabolic and Physiological Responses to Boron Stress in Higher Plants

by
María Reguera
1,*,† and
Juan José Camacho-Cristóbal
2,*,†
1
Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, c/Darwin 2, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2
Departamento de Fisiología, Anatomía y Biología Celular, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(11), 2136; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112136
Submission received: 16 May 2023 / Accepted: 24 May 2023 / Published: 28 May 2023

1. Background

Although the essentiality of boron (B) for plant growth has recently been questioned [1], raising an exciting discussion between “Boronists” [2,3], its requirement in plant development was first established at the beginning of the 20th century [4]. B, as boric acid (H3BO3) and tetrahydroxyl borate anion B(OH)4, can form complexes with biological compounds containing two hydroxyl groups in cis-configuration. In this regard, it has been proposed that the binding capacity of B plays a key role in biological systems by stabilizing molecules with cis-diol groups, regardless of the role played by these molecules [5]. Nonetheless, to date, the only evidence for a direct involvement of B in plant metabolism comes from its structural role in the cell wall through the formation of ester bonds between the borate anion and the apiose residues of two molecules of rhamnogalacturonan II (RGII) [6,7]. However, this evidence cannot explain the plethora of plant processes affected by both B deficiency and toxicity, so the possibility that other primary functions of B may exist should not be ruled out. Furthermore, it should be noted that B is an essential element for vascular plants that have a very narrow range of optimal concentrations, so controlling its availability to plants in soils and irrigation water is crucial for agricultural production. In fact, both B deficiency and toxicity have negative effects on the development and yield of crop plants [8,9,10].
Therefore, knowledge of the molecular, metabolic, and physiological changes induced by B deficiency or toxicity, as well as the characterization of the signaling pathways for these responses, which has advanced greatly in recent years, can contribute not only to a better understanding of the role of B in plants, but can also provide efficient strategies to improve B stress tolerance in plants. In line with this, this Special Issue of Plants presents a collection of eight manuscripts covering basic and applied topics on the response of vascular plants to B stress.

2. Main Findings Considered in this Special Issue

2.1. One-Time Foliar Application and Continuous Resupply via Roots Equally Improved the Growth and Physiological Response of B-Deficient Oilseed Rape [11]

B deficiency problems usually occur in regions with high rainfall conditions where boric acid in the soil solution can easily leach out. The symptoms of B deficiency in crop plants cultivated on B-deficient soils can be alleviated by the application of B fertilizers, as soil fertilization or foliar spray. In this regard, Dinh et al. [11] have studied the effectiveness of B resupply via roots and leaves to alleviate several symptoms of B deficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) plants grown hydroponically. They concluded that both types of B fertilization to oilseed rape plants can partially resolve the effects of B deficiency on dry matter production, net photosynthesis, and sugar contents, and on the expression of specific B transporters.

2.2. Crosstalk of Cytokinin with Ethylene and Auxin for Cell Elongation Inhibition and Boron Transport in Arabidopsis Primary Root under Boron Deficiency [12]

The knowledge on the signaling pathways for the response of plants to B deficiency has advanced greatly in recent years. For instance, recent studies revealed the involvement of hormones (including ethylene, auxin, cytokinin, brassinosteroids, and ABA), calcium, and reactive oxygen species in the orchestrated signaling pathways of B stress responses [13]. Findings in these fields can contribute not only to a better understanding of the role of B in plants, but also provide efficient strategies to improve B stress tolerance in plants. In this regard, Herrera-Rodríguez et al. [12] provided evidence that cytokinins negatively regulate root cell elongation in Arabidopsis plants subjected to B deficiency through two independent pathways involving ethylene and auxins. The results also suggest that these phytohormones regulate the gene expression of several B transporters in the root.

2.3. Salt-Pretreatment-Mediated Alleviation of Boron Toxicity in Safflower Cultivars: Growth, Boron Accumulation, Photochemical Activities, and Antioxidant Defense Response [14]

B toxicity and salinity stresses often occur together, so there is growing interest in studying the interactive effects of these stresses on plant growth [15]. The work of Arslan et al. [14] analyzed the potential use of salt pretreatment to alleviate the effects of B toxicity on growth, phytoremediation capacity, photosynthesis, and oxidative stress in two safflower cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Results suggested that salt pretreatment partially mitigated several of the biochemical and physiological changes caused by B toxicity.

2.4. Carbon-11 Radiotracing Reveals Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Maize Grown under Different Regimes of Boron Treatment [16]

B deficiency can alter plant growth and physiology, which has been related to its role in stabilizing cell wall structure [17]. In this sense, monocots have generally shown a lower B requirement, which has been linked to a reduced pectin content compared to dicotyledonous plants. However, positive responses in terms of plant productivity have been reported in different cereal species, including maize [18]. In the work performed by Wilder et al. [16], the impact of B on carbon partitioning was evaluated using 11C-radiotracing, highlighting the strong effect of B deficiency on metabolism. Furthermore, they demonstrated that synergistic and antagonistic relations occur among certain mineral nutrients when changing B supply.

2.5. Citrus Physiological and Molecular Response to Boron Stresses [19]

B is an essential element for vascular plants that has a very narrow range of optimal concentrations, so controlling its availability to plants in soils and irrigation water is crucial for agricultural production. In fact, both B deficiency and toxicity have negative effects on the development and yield of crop plants [8,9,10]. In this regard, the essentiality of B in citrus plants was discovered soon after B was shown to be essential for plants [4,20], and since then different works have described the effects of B deficiency or toxicity in these plant species. Yang et al. [19] reviews the research performed in Citrus when subjected to B stress, and emphasizes the importance of further analyzing B transport and allocation in Citrus, a genus that comprises important crops for the fruit industry.

2.6. Silicon Differently Affects the Apoplastic Binding of Excess Boron in Wheat and Sunflower Leaves [21]

B toxicity problems often occur in crops of arid/semiarid regions with low rainfall and high water evaporation where B accumulates in the uppermost layers of the soil, reaching toxic levels for plants. Alleviating the symptoms of B toxicity in crop plants can be achieved by applying elements that have a positive impact on the physiological tolerance of plants (i.e., those preventing oxidative stress). For instance, Savic et al. [21] demonstrated that Si fertilization significantly decreased B concentration in wheat (Triticum vulgare L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) leaves when growing under high-B conditions, leading to a recovery of plant growth, especially in wheat. Interestingly, Si application increased the B-binding capacity of the leaf apoplast in wheat but not in sunflower.

2.7. Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Drought under Salinity and Boron Stress in the Atacama Desert [22]

Drought can interfere with B influx as it limits water transpiration and uptake [23]. On the other hand, interactions between salinity and B stress (that could act simultaneously, especially in arid and semiarid regions [24]) have been described in different plant species and linked to limited water uptake [25]. The work of Riveros-Burgos et al. [22] evaluated the effect of the combination of the three stressors (drought, salinity, and high B) on the physiological response of ‘lluteño’ maize (Zea mays L.), which is adapted to the Atacama Desert, pointing to a genotypic-dependent response in maize to the simultaneous action of these environmental stresses.

2.8. What Can Boron Deficiency Symptoms Tell Us about Its Function and Regulation? [26]

B-deficient plants may exhibit a wide range of symptoms depending on the species and the developmental stage of the plant [27]. In recent years, the use of novel molecular tools has allowed for the discovery of novel functions and ligands of B in organisms including bacteria, animals, and plants. Still, there is a general lack of knowledge regarding the specific functions of B, B stress signaling pathways, and B interactors beyond its structural role in the plant cell wall. Bolaños et al. [26] proposed a model integrating B-deficiency symptoms and signaling pathways, summarizing the current knowledge regarding B putative ligands in plants.

Author Contributions

M.R. and J.J.C.-C. contributed equally to the preparation of this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN, Spain) and the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2020-118327GB-I00).

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We specially thank all the authors that have contributed to this Special Issue and the Section Managing Editor, who has greatly helped us throughout the editorial process.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lewis, D.H. Boron: The essential element for vascular plants that never was. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1685–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. González-Fontes, A. Why boron is an essential element for vascular plants. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1228–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wimmer, M.A.; Abreu, I.; Bell, R.W.; Bienert, M.D.; Brown, P.H.; Dell, B.; Fujiwara, T.; Goldbach, H.E.; Lehto, T.; Mock, H.P.; et al. Boron: An essential element for vascular plants. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1232–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Warington, K. The effect of boric acid and borax on the broad bean and certain other plants. Ann. Bot. 1923, 37, 629–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bolaños, L.; Lukaszewski, K.; Bonilla, I.; Blevins, D. Why Boron? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kobayashi, M.; Matoh, T.; Azuma, J. Two chains of rhamnogalacturonan II are cross-linked by borate-diol ester bonds in higher plant cell walls. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1017–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. O’Neill, M.A.; Warrenfeltz, D.; Kates, K.; Pellerin, P.; Doco, T.; Darvill, A.G.; Albersheim, P. Rhamnogalacturonan-II, a pectic polysaccharide in the walls of growing plant cell, forms a dimer that is covalently cross-linked by a borate ester. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 22923–22930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goldbach, H.E.; Wimmer, M.A. Boron in Plants and Animals: Is There a Role beyond Cell-Wall Structure? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Landi, M.; Margaritopoulou, T.; Papadakis, I.E.; Araniti, F. Boron toxicity in higher plants: An update. Planta 2019, 250, 1011–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Brdar-Jokanovi’c, M. Boron toxicity and deficiency in agricultural plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dinh, A.Q.; Naeem, A.; Sagervanshi, A.; Mühling, K.H. One-Time Foliar Application and Continuous Resupply via Roots Equally Improved the Growth and Physiological Response of B-Deficient Oilseed Rape. Plants 2021, 10, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Barrero-Rodríguez, R.; Rexach, J.; Navarro-Gochicoa, M.T.; González-Fontes, A. Crosstalk of Cytokinin with Ethylene and Auxin for Cell Elongation Inhibition and Boron Transport in Arabidopsis Primary Root under Boron Deficiency. Plants 2022, 11, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, X.; Smith, S.M.; Shabala, S.; Yu, M. Phytohormones in plant responses to boron deficiency and toxicity. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arslan, Ö.; Çulha Erdal, Ş.; Ekmekçi, Y. Salt Pretreatment-Mediated Alleviation of Boron Toxicity in Safflower Cultivars: Growth, Boron Accumulation, Photochemical Activities, Antioxidant Defense Response. Plants 2022, 11, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pandey, A.; Khan, M.K.; Hakki, E.E.; Gezgin, S.; Hamurcu, M. Combined Boron Toxicity and Salinity Stress—An Insight into Its Interaction in Plants. Plants 2019, 8, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilder, S.L.; Scott, S.; Waller, S.; Powell, A.; Benoit, M.; Guthrie, J.M.; Schueller, M.J.; Awale, P.; McSteen, P.; Matthes, M.S.; et al. Carbon-11 Radiotracing Reveals Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Maize Grown under Different Regimes of Boron Treatment. Plants 2022, 11, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goldbach, H.E.; Huang, L.; Wimmer, M.A. Boron Functions in Plants and Animals: Recent Advances in Boron Research and Open Questions. In Advances in Plant and Animal Boron Nutrition; Xu, F., Goldbach, H., Brown, P., Bell, R., Fujiwara, T., Hunt, C., Goldberg, S., Shi, L., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lordkaew, S.; Dell, B.; Jamjod, S.; Rerkasem, B. Boron deficiency in maize. Plant Soil 2011, 342, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, L.-T.; Pan, J.-F.; Hu, N.-J.; Chen, H.-H.; Jiang, H.-X.; Lu, Y.-B.; Chen, L.-S. Citrus Physiological and Molecular Response to Boron Stresses. Plants 2022, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haas, A.R.C. Boron as an essential element for healthy growth of citrus. Bot. Gaz. 1930, 89, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Savic, J.; Pavlovic, J.; Stanojevic, M.; Bosnic, P.; Kostic Kravljanac, L.; Nikolic, N.; Nikolic, M. Silicon Differently Affects Apoplastic Binding of Excess Boron in Wheat and Sunflower Leaves. Plants 2023, 12, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Riveros-Burgos, C.; Bustos-Peña, R.; Esteban-Condori, W.; Bastías, E. Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Drought under Salinity and Boron Stress in the Atacama Desert. Plants 2023, 12, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aydin, M.; Tombuloglu, G.; Sakcali, M.S.; Hakeem, K.R.; Tombuloglu, H. Boron Alleviates Drought Stress by Enhancing Gene Expression and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2019, 19, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gupta, E.C.; Jame, Y.W.; Campbell, C.A.; Leyshon, A.J.; Nicholaichuk, W. Boron toxicity and deficiency: A review. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1985, 65, 381–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martínez-Ballesta, M.; Bastías, E.; Zhu, C.; Schäffner, A.R.; González-Moro, B.; González-Murua, C.; Carvajal, M. Boric acid and salinity effects on maize roots. Response of aquaporins ZmPIP1 and ZmPIP2, and plasma membrane H+-ATPase, in relation to water and nutrient uptake. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bolaños, L.; Abreu, I.; Bonilla, I.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Reguera, M. What Can Boron Deficiency Symptoms Tell Us about Its Function and Regulation? Plants 2023, 12, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, U.C. Boron nutrition in crops. Adv. Agron. 1980, 31, 273–307. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reguera, M.; Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J. Molecular, Metabolic and Physiological Responses to Boron Stress in Higher Plants. Plants 2023, 12, 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112136

AMA Style

Reguera M, Camacho-Cristóbal JJ. Molecular, Metabolic and Physiological Responses to Boron Stress in Higher Plants. Plants. 2023; 12(11):2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reguera, María, and Juan José Camacho-Cristóbal. 2023. "Molecular, Metabolic and Physiological Responses to Boron Stress in Higher Plants" Plants 12, no. 11: 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop