Next Article in Journal
Subterranean Clover and Sulla as Valuable and Complementary Sources of Bioactive Compounds for Rainfed Mediterranean Farming Systems
Previous Article in Journal
LC-MS Analysis and Antifungal Activity of Turnera subulata Sm.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association between the Classification of the Genus of Batrachospermaceae (Rhodophyta) and the Environmental Factors Based on Machine Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Species from the Canary Islands Increases the Diversity of the Red Algal Genus Pterocladiella in the Northeastern Atlantic

by
Nereida M. Rancel-Rodríguez
1,*,
Julio Afonso-Carrillo
1,
Ana Tronholm
1,2,3 and
Marta Sansón
1
1
Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Sección Biología, Universidad de La Laguna, Avenida Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, 38206 La Laguna, Spain
2
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
3
Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 461, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(2), 416; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020416
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 16 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity and Taxonomy of Algae)

Abstract

:
Environmental and human factors are inducing a drastic decline in many marine algae in regions with a high floristic richness as in the Canary Islands. Simultaneously, undescribed algal species continue to be discovered, suggesting a probable loss in diversity, before being properly identified and catalogued. Turf-forming Gelidiales occur in marine littoral communities from tropical to warm temperate regions and are challenging to identify correctly because of their small size and simple morphology. In the present study, we combined morphological and molecular phylogenetics methods to study a turf-forming species of the genus Pterocladiella from the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic). Both cox1 and rbcL gene analyses revealed a novel species described here, Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. The new species has no single unique morphological feature, but it is different by a distinctive combination of attributes, namely, minute size less than 18 mm in height, ribbon-like erect axes, small polygonal cortical cells, cystocarp circular in outline with placental tissue attached to the floor, spermatangial sori with sterile margins with spermatangia simultaneously formed on both sides of the blade, and tetrasporangia arranged in V-shaped rows. Phylogenies inferred from cox1 and concatenated genes (cox1 + rbcL) suggest a link to only two Pterocladiella species endemic to South Africa and Madagascar; nevertheless, the rbcL gene establishes P. canariensis as the earliest divergent lineage of the genus.

1. Introduction

The red algal genus Pterocladiella Santelices and Hommersand (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) is an economically important source of agar and agarose with multiple uses in food and laboratory technologies [1,2,3]. It was established by Santelices and Hommersand [4] to accommodate those species previously assigned to Pterocladia J. Agardh exhibiting, together with the usual vegetative characters (i.e., compressed to flattened erect axes, opposite or alternate pinnate branches, terete to slightly compressed prostrate stolons bearing peg-like haptera, and internal rhizoidal filaments in the medulla), the following reproductive features: (1) intercalary carpogonia directed toward both surfaces of the thallus, (2) nutritive filaments growing centripetally and forming a virtually solid cylinder around the central axis, and (3) cystocarps usually attached to one side of the cystocarp floor with chains of carposporangia on the remaining three sides. In addition to the type species, Pterocladiella capillacea (Gmelin) Santelices and Hommersand, three other species were assigned to the new genus supported by both morphological and molecular evidence [5,6]. Subsequent studies led to the transfer of a total of ten species initially assigned to Pterocladia within Pterocladiella [7,8,9], and uncovered an ensemble of new species based on molecular and morphological datasets, mainly among small taxa with relatively simple morphologies growing in dense turf-like communities [1,2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Currently, a total of 25 species with warm-temperate to tropical distributions are accepted in Pterocladiella [18]. However, recent findings by Boo et al. [19], using DNA-based species delimitation methods, have uncovered a notable cryptic diversity in Pterocladiella, delimiting up to 43 species, of which 19 remain undescribed, including two species hitherto assigned to Gelidiella Feldmann and Hamel.
Pterocladiella capillacea and P. melanoidea (Schousboe ex Bornet) Santelices and Hommersand have been the only two species of the genus identified in the Northeast Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea up until now [3,18,20]. But according to Boo et al. [19] a third species must be considered since the subtidal Gelidiella calcicola Maggs and Guiry [21] and the intertidal P. melanoidea sensu Díaz-Tapia and Bárbara [22] from Atlantic Europe are conspecific and different from P. melanoidea [19]. Both P. capillacea and P. melanoidea have also been reported from the Canary Islands [23,24]. The relatively widely distributed P. capillacea is a common species in macroalgal assemblages from shallow sublittoral in the Canaries [25], whereas P. melanoidea has been reported only from a few localities as a eulittoral turf-like species growing in low-light habitats [26,27,28]. Subsequent studies carried out on a population from the south of Tenerife revealed plants that, although assigned to P. melanoidea, exhibited vegetative and reproductive morphological features previously unreported in this species [29,30]. Here we examine in detail the attributes of these plants showing morphological and molecular evidence that support the description of the new species Pterocladiella canariensis N.M. Rancel-Rodríguez, J. Afonso-Carrillo, A. Tronholm and M. Sansón.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

Two new sequences of cox1 and rbcL were obtained from a specimen from the Canary Islands. A total of 45 rbcL sequences (1397 base pairs) were aligned including publicly available sequences of Pterocladiella and four outgroups: Aphanta pachyrrhiza Tronchin and Freshwater, Gelidium canariense (Grunow) Seoane-Camba ex Haroun, Gil-Rodríguez, Díaz de Castro and Prud’homme van Reine, Gelidium corneum (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, and Pterocladia lucida (Turner) J. Agardh. The new sequences were assigned to the monophyletic Pterocladiella clade with high support in the rbcL tree (BS: 97; BPP: 0.9; Figure 1), but did not match any publicly available sequences and are here assigned to the new species Pterocladiella canariensis. The other NE Atlantic Pterocladiella species (P. capillacea, P. melanoidea, and ‘Gelidiella calcicola’) were resolved in distant topological positions from the Canarian species. The pairwise divergences were 0.165 for P. canariensis and P. capillacea, 0.200 with P. melanoidea, and 0.120 with ‘Gelidiella calcicola’.
Thirty-eight cox1 sequences (1337 bp) were aligned using two outgroups: Aphanta pachyrrhiza Tronchin and Freshwater, and Pterocladia lucida (Turner) J. Agardh. The new species is nested within the large clade of all remaining species of Pterocladiella with high support (BS: 98; BPP: 0.9; Figure 2). In the cox1 tree, P. canariensis clustered with P. feldmannii G.H.Boo, L.Le Gall, I.K.Hwang and S.M.Boo and P. hamelii G.H.Boo, L.Le Gall, I.K.Hwang and S.M.Boo (both from Madagascar) as a sister clade to the rest of the Pterocladiella species with low support (BS: 69; BPP: 0.9; Figure 2). The cox1 pairwise divergence between the Canarian specimens and P. feldmanii was 0.170.
Both gene sequences from thirty-five taxa were concatenated and analyzed (2686 bp). The concatenated alignment was concordant with the cox1 gene phylogeny and the new specimen from the Canary Islands received strong support within the Pterocladiella genus (BS: 99; BPP: 0.9). P. canariensis is clustered with P. feldmanii and P. hamelii with better resolution than the cox1 gene (BP: 90; BPP: 0.9; Figure 3).

2.2. Morphological Analysis

2.2.1. Habit and Vegetative Morphology

Plants formed low-growing turf-like tufts that attached firmly to rocky substrates in low-light habitats (Figure 4A). Plants were dark red to deep purple when live and turned to a dark black color when dried as herbarium vouchers (Figure 4B–F), slender in appearance, membranous to slightly cartilaginous, consisting of stoloniferous and erect axes. The erect axes were flattened and ribbon-like, 300–600 µm wide and 40–70 µm thick, attenuated and subcylindrical towards the base, up to 30 µm wide. The main axes reach 6–11(–18) mm high, with distichous and very irregular, alternate, opposite, or pinnate branches. Branches were usually up two orders, attenuated at the base, irregular in width, and ending in acute or rounded tips (Figure 4B–F). Occasionally, lateral branches wholly or terminally filiform become prostrate and form secondary holdfasts. Sometimes erect axes are partially covered by dense populations of coccoid cyanobacteria. Prostrate axes (stolons) were terete to slightly compressed, 100–130 µm wide and 6–15(–22) mm long (Figure 4G), irregularly branched, fixed to the substrate by holdfasts usually arising oppositely to the upright axis (Figure 4H,I). Each holdfast consists of internal thick-walled rhizoidal filaments coalescing in a thick sheath, (95–)112–118(–226) µm long and (36–)44–58 µm wide, surrounded by pigmented cortical filaments. Younger attachments were peg-like with an acute or rounded end, while the more mature ones ended in a small disc (Figure 4H,I). Sometimes, the holdfasts lost the covering cortical filaments and the rhizoidal filaments became free.
Apical cell morphology varies from dome-shaped, 5–8 µm wide and 3–5 µm long, in attenuated apex, or slightly protruding in obtuse apices, or even sunken in a small depression between cortical lobes (Figure 5A–D). The first cell product of the apical cell divides to form an axial cell and two periaxial cells. In transverse-section, cells of the central row were rounded, 7–11(–13) µm wide, with a very narrow lumen, and included the narrower axial cell, and two opposite periaxial cells, from which arises a second-order filament of 3–5 cells (Figure 5E). Second-order filament cells form outwards short chains of up to three smaller globose, pigmented cortical cells (Figure 5E). Very few internal rhizoidal filaments, 3–4 µm wide, occurred irregularly arranged among the central row and the inner cortical cells, mainly in the erect axis (Figure 5E). This structural pattern, with a central row of hyaline cells and 3–4 layers of cortical cells, persists along the flattened erect axes (Figure 5F,G). In surface view, outer cortical cells were polygonal and isodiametric, thick-walled, 3–6 µm wide, and irregularly arranged (Figure 5H).

2.2.2. Reproductive Morphology and Seasonality

Plants are dioecious and four morphologically similar plants can be recognized: sporophytes, male gametophytes, female gametophytes, and non-fertile plants. About 80% of the specimens collected exhibited reproductive structures throughout the year, except in winter when the fertile specimens were reduced to 50%. Sporophytes were always dominant among the fertile specimens with a ratio of 50%, which reduced to 30% in winter. Male gametophytes were in a low proportion throughout the year, but they represented up to 20% of the fertile specimens during the spring. Female gametophytes occur throughout the year, but they were especially abundant in autumn (20%).
Tetrasporangia were formed in terminal sori on the flattened branches and branchlets (Figure 6A). Sori were elongated to ovoid, up to 780 µm long and 200–370 µm wide, with sterile margins (Figure 6B). Tetrasporangia were regularly arranged in V-shaped rows with 6–8 sporangia in each transverse row and developing in an acropetal sequence, with the most immature in the apical rows (Figure 6B,C). Occasionally, along the same branch or branchlets, two sori, initially isolated, can coalesce. Mature tetrasporangia were sub-spherical, often laterally compressed, 20–32 µm in diameter, usually cruciate or decussately divided, and immersed in the cortex (Figure 6D). Each tetrasporangium originated adaxially from an inner cortical cell, and in a transverse section tetrasporangia were arranged on both sides of the central row, increasing the thickness of the fertile branch to 70–105 µm. Mature sori showed discharged spores from the posterior rows, leaving gaps amongst the cortical cells (Figure 6B,D).
Spermatangia were formed in hyaline spermatangial sori on the terminal portions of axes or branchlets (Figure 6E). Sori were ovoid or elongated, 328–1165 µm long and 164–287 µm wide, showing a sterile margin (Figure 6F). Occasionally, two sori initially isolated coalesced. In surface view, hyaline spermatangia were globose, 1–3 µm in diameter, occupied the entire surface of the sorus, and simultaneously formed on both sides of the blade (Figure 6G). In transverse section, a mature spermatangial sorus appears slightly sunken and covered by a fine mucilaginous membrane that when broken allows the release of spermatia (Figure 6H). All outer cortical cells form closely packed, elongated spermatangial mother cells (c. 1 µm wide and 6–8 µm long), which cut off globose spermatangia outwards. Released spermatia can be observed adhering to the mucilage on the surface of mature sori.
Young fertile carpogonial branches are recognized by the presence of a longitudinal hyaline groove, 300–830 µm long, starting from the apex of the branch (Figure 6I,J). Carpogonia are formed from inner cortical cells in two parallel rows on each side of the axial filament but only towards one surface of the fertile branch. Nutritive filaments are borne on inner cortical cells on one or both sides around the axial cell, forming an incomplete ring around each axial segment (Figure 6K–N). A single subterminal cystocarp—rarely two to three—is formed on an axis or lateral branch. Mature cystocarps are ellipsoidal, 160–530 µm long, and 140–430 µm wide, with a sterile margin (Figure 6O). They are prominent, 350–540 µm high towards the fertile surface, and slightly convex on the opposite side. Cystocarps are unilocular, with one (two to three) ostioles irregularly placed, and 20–40 µm in diameter (Figure 6J,O). Ostioles are covered by a cuticle that detaches to release the carpospores. In transverse section, immature cystocarps exhibit a nutritive network of compact tissue around the central axis with rounded nutritive cells, 4–8 µm in diameter. Later, the gonimoblast attached to the cystocarp floor, and formed terminal chains of three to four ovoid carposporangia 12–21 µm long and 6–12 µm wide, that together with the nutritive filaments occupy most of a wide cystocarpic cavity that is circular in transverse-section (Figure 6P).

2.3. Pterocladiella canariensis N.M. Rancel-Rodríguez, J. Afonso-Carrillo, A. Tronholm and M. Sansón sp. nov.

Diagnosis: With morphological characters of the genus Pterocladiella and: attached to substrata by holdfast developing from prostrate axes (stolons); erect axes (up to 18 mm in height), compressed and ribbon-like (300–600 µm wide and 40–70 µm thick); sparse, irregular branching up to two orders; outer cortical cells polygonal (3–6 µm wide); very few internal rhizoidal filaments, restricted to inner cortical cells of basal portions of erect axes, and in prostrate axes; tetrasporangial sori with sterile margins and tetrasporangia arranged in V-shaped rows; spermatangial sori surrounded by a sterile margin with spermatangia simultaneously formed on both sides of the blade; cystocarps ellipsoidal (160–530 µm long and 140–430 µm wide) prominent and circular in outline in transverse section (350–540 µm high), with the placental tissue attached to the floor.
Holotype: TFC Phyc 16400 (tetrasporophyte); El Médano, Tenerife, Canary Islands (28°02′44″ N; 16°32′14″ O), collected by M. Sansón on 22 September 2018 (Figure 4B). Isotypes: TFC Phyc 16401 (tetrasporophyte), TFC Phyc 16402 (tetrasporophyte), TFC Phyc 16403 (tetrasporophyte), TFC Phyc 16404 (female gametophytes), TFC Phyc 16405 (female gametophytes), TFC Phyc 16406 (female gametophytes), TFC Phyc 16407 (female gametophytes), TFC Phyc 16408 (male gametophytes), TFC Phyc 16409 (male gametophytes), and TFC Phyc 16410 (male gametophytes).
Type locality: El Médano, Tenerife, Canary Islands.
Etymology: Specific epithet refers to the type locality (Latin: canariensis).
Molecular sequences of holotype specimen: OQ247985 for cox1 and OQ216580 for rbcL. Since the isotypes were duplicate specimens of the holotype, as indicated by the specimen number, DNA sequencing of the isotypes was not repeated.
Distribution: Only known from the type locality.
Other specimens studied: Information on other specimens examined in this study has been included in Materials and Methods.

3. Discussion

Integrative approaches combining morphological and molecular analyses involving the mitochondrial cox1 and plastid rbcL sequences have greatly improved species identification and phylogenetic relationships in the Gelidiales, as well as in other red algae [13,31,32,33,34,35]. For taxa such as Pterocladiella with poorly differentiated external appearance, relatively simple vegetative structure, high degree of phenotypic plasticity, and rare occurrence of sexual reproductive structures, establishing a sufficient number of morphological characters for the discrimination of species following the traditional taxonomy can be an unattainable goal without the help of molecular tools [2,17,36,37,38]. Pterocladiella represents a good example in this regard, taking into account the difficulty of studying small taxa growing in dense turf communities, which hide a variety of so far overlooked diversity [15,16,17]. Phylogenetic analyses using several molecular markers individually and in various combinations have proven to be very useful tools for establishing the differences and similarities among species not detected by morphological studies [1,2,14,39]. After the recent results presented by Boo et al. [19], Pterocladiella joins a growing list of red algal taxa such as Lithophyllum Philippi [40], Portieria Zanardini [41], Polysiphonia Greville [42], Porolithon Foslie [43], or Sporolithon Heydrich [44] for which DNA sequence analyses have resulted in a remarkable increase in species diversity. Pending morphological studies now underway [19], Pterocladiella currently includes 25 formally described species, to which should be added another 17 genetically differentiated but as yet undescribed species, and two species that must be transferred from Gelidiella.
The alga studied here and described as Pterocladiella canariensis N.M. Rancel-Rodríguez, J. Afonso-Carrillo, A. Tronholm, and M. Sansón sp. nov. grows in dense turf-like communities and it was initially assigned to P. melanoidea, the only species with similar characteristics previously reported for the NE Atlantic [29,30,45,46]. However, the morphological and molecular evidence presented here conclusively demonstrates that the specimens from the Canary Islands are distinct in vegetative and reproductive morphology and have a distant phylogenetic relationship with specimens identified as P. melanoidea in the Mediterranean Sea.
Pterocladiella canariensis exhibits the characteristic vegetative and reproductive attributes of both Gelidiales and Pterocladiella [47,48]. Although it has no single species-specific feature, P. canariensis is distinguished from other species of the genus by a distinctive combination of attributes (Table 1). These include the minute size of plants that are less than 18 mm in height with erect axes compressed and ribbon-like, only subcylindrical in basal portions, sparse and irregularly branching up to two orders, small polygonal cortical cells (less than 6 µm wide), very few internal rhizoidal filaments that are restricted to the inner cortical cells of stolons and basal portions of erect axes, cystocarps circular in outline seen in transverse sections with the placental tissue attached to the floor, spermatangial sori surrounded by a sterile margin with spermatangia simultaneously formed on both sides of the blade, and tetrasporangia arranged in V-shaped rows in sori possessing a sterile margin (Table 1). However, P. melanoidea (type locality: Tangier, Morocco, and also reported in the Mediterranean Sea and Northeast Atlantic) is distinguished by larger plants (up to 40 mm in height) with thin erect axes subcylindrical to flattened, irregularly branched including opposite at right angles or pinnate branches up to two orders, larger ovoid cortical cells (6–12 µm long), and cystocarp of triangular outline seen in transverse section [45,46,47,49]. Pterocladiella canariensis is also distinct from ‘Gelidiella calcicola’ Maggs and Guiry [21] (type locality: Carraroe, County Galway, Ireland), a morphologically similar taxon that has been erroneously identified as P. melanoidea in different localities of the NE Atlantic between Brittany and Portugal [22,50]. According to Boo et al. [19], this taxon belongs to Pterocladiella but it is phylogenetically distantly related to specimens identified as P. melanoidea in the Mediterranean Sea. ‘Gelidiella calcicola’ is characterized by plants up to 30 mm in height with terete to flattened erect axes, larger polygonal cortical cells (5–18 µm wide), triangular cystocarp in transverse section, and lacks sterile margin in tetrasporangial sori [21,22,50,51].
As compared in Table 1, Pterocladiella canariensis is also distinct from P. australafricanensis, P. bartlettii, P. beachiae, P. capillacea, P. media, P. sanctarum, and ‘Gelidiella feldmannii’, the remaining species known from the Atlantic coasts. P. australafricanensis (type locality: Four Buoy Reef, Sodwana Bay, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; also reported from Brazil) is distinguished by the pinnate branching, the elliptical outline of cystocarp with placental tissue in the center of the cavity, and an irregular arrangement of tetrasporangia in sori lacking a sterile margin [13,39]. P. bartlettii (type locality: Saint Louis du Sud, Haiti; widely reported from Texas to Brazil, Madagascar, Malaysia, New Caledonia, Singapore, and Vietnam) differs by larger plants (up to 80 mm) profusely branched up to four orders, cylindrical to compressed erect axes, larger circular outer cortical cells, elliptical outline of the cystocarp, and lack of sterile margin in tetrasporangial sorus [2,39]. P. beachiae (type locality: Cahuita, Limón, Costa Rica; also reported from Brazil) mainly differs by larger plants (up to 60 mm) pinnately branched up to three orders, the elliptical outline of cystocarp with placental tissue in the center of the cavity, and an irregular arrangement of tetrasporangia in sori lacking a sterile margin [10,39]. P. capillacea (type locality: Mediterranean Sea; widely reported from the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean) is a larger plant (up to 20 cm) pinnately branched up to four orders, with numerous internal rhizoidal filaments in the central medulla, triangular and slightly rostrate cystocarp with placental tissue in the center of the cavity, and has tetrasporangia irregularly arranged or in horizontal rows [3,11,52]. P. media (type locality: Neptune Place, La Jolla, CA, USA; also reported from Brazil and Easter Pacific) mainly differs by erect axes distally branched up to three orders, the elliptical outline of cystocarp where the placental tissue is central in the cavity, and tetrasporangial sori lacking a sterile margin [39,53]. P. sanctarum (type locality: Îles des Saintes, Guadeloupe, West Indies; also reported from North American and Caribbean Islands) is also a minute species (up to 20 mm height) but differs by erect axes thin and compressed, ending narrower and cylindrical larger square outer cortical cells, and tetrasporangia irregularly arranged or in horizontal rows [9,54]. Finally, ‘Gelidiella feldmannii’ (type locality: Nightingale Island and the Settlement, Tristan da Cunha) is a taxon belonging to Pterocladiella according to molecular evidence [19,55], although to date no new name for this species has been proposed to date. It is also a minute species (up to 15 mm height) but differs by erect axes subcylindrical to flattened, irregularly branched including opposite at right angles or pinnate branches up to two orders [55,56].
Table 1. Comparison of Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. and Atlantic and related species.
Table 1. Comparison of Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. and Atlantic and related species.
Species/
References
Type
Locality/
Distribution
Plant Size (mm)/
Branching
Erect Axes ShapesCortical Cells: Shape and Size in SV (µm)Internal Rhizoidal FilamentsCystocarp: Shape (TS)/
Placental Tissue
Position in Cystocarp Cavity
Spermatangia:
Sorus Margin/Spermatangial Arrangement
Tetrasporangia: Sorus Margin/Tetrasporangial Arrangement
Pterocladiella australafricanensis Tronchin and Freshwater
[12,13,39]
South Africa/
Western Indo-Pacific and Western Atlantic
≤30/alternate pinnate up to two orderslanceolate to ligulate, compressedcircular to elliptical
9.5–17
many in the outer medullaelliptical/
central
n.d.absent/
irregular
P. bartlettii (W.R.Taylor) Santelices
[39]
Haiti/
Western Atlantic, Central Indo-Pacific, and Western Indo-Pacific
≤80/opposite to irregular up to four orderslinear, narrow, compressed to cylindricalcircular
7–13
few in the central medullaelliptical/
close to the floor
n.d.absent/
V-shaped rows
P. beachiae Freshwater in Thomas and Freshwater
[10,39]
Costa Rica/
Western Atlantic
≤60/pinnate to irregular up to three ordersligulate, compressedcircular to elliptical
8–15
many in the central medullaelliptical/
central
present/
one or both branch surfaces
absent/
irregular
P. caespitosa
(Kylin) Santelices
[57]
South Africa/
South Africa
≤30/
rare to irregularly alternate up to two orders
thin, slightly compressed to flattened rounded
up to 15
many in the central medullacircular/
close to the floor
n.d.present/
irregular to V-shaped rows
P. canariensis
N.M. Rancel-Rodríguez, J. Afonso-Carrillo, A. Tronholm and M. Sansón [Present study]
Canary Islands/
Canary Islands
≤18/sparse and irregularly branched up to two orderscompressed and ribbon-like, attenuate and subcylindrical towards the basepolygonal
3–6
few in the inner cortex of basal portionscircular/
close to the floor
present/
both branch surfaces
present/
V-shaped rows
P. capillacea (S.G.Gmelin) Santelices and Hommersand
[3,11,52]
Mediterranean Sea/
Pacific, Atlantic, and Mediterranean Sea
≤200/pinnate up to four ordersslightly compressed to flattenedcircular
4.5–9
many in the central medullatriangular and slightly rostrate/
central
present/
both branch surfaces
present/
irregular to horizontal rows
P. feldmannii G.H.Boo, L.Le Gall, I.K.Hwang and S.M.Boo
[2]
Madagascar/
Madagascar
≤60/opposite to irregular up to two (three) orderslinear and terete to compressedpolygonal
5–10 × 10–13
many in inner cortical layersn.d.n.d.absent/
irregular
P. hamelii
G.H.Boo, L.Le Gall, I.K.Hwang and S.M.Boo
[2]
Madagascar/
Madagascar
≤30/
rare and irregular
thin and compressedovoid to rounded
12–13 × 14.3–20
few in the medullan.d.n.d.present/
irregular to horizontal rows
P. media (E.Y.Dawson) G.H.Boo and K.A.Miller
[38,39,49]
California/
Eastern Pacific and Western Atlantic
≤40/irregular and distal up to three orderslinear and flattenedelliptical
4–7 × 7.5–9.5
rare in the medulla of basal portion of erect axeselliptical/
central
n.d.absent/
irregular to V-shaped rows
P. melanoidea (Schousboe ex Bornet) Santelices and Hommersand
[45,46,47,48,49]
Morocco/
North-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea
≤40/irregular, opposite at right angles to pinnate up to two ordersthin, subcylindrical to flattenedovoid
5–8 × 6–12
few in the medulla of basal portionstriangular/
close to the floor
present/
both branch surfaces
present/
V-shaped rows
P. sanctarum
(Feldman and Hamel) Santelices
[9,54]
Guadeloupe, West Indies/
Western Atlantic
≤20/
few and irregularly branched up to two orders
thin and slightly compressed, ending narrower and cylindricalsquare
10–12
few in the medulla of basal portionsn.d.n.d.present/
irregular to horizontal rows
Gelidiella calcicola’ Maggs and Guiry
[21,22,51]
Ireland/
NE Atlantic
≤30/
few to densely branched up to two orders
thin, terete to flattenedpolygonal
5–18
few in medulla of stolonstriangular/
close to the floor
n.d.absent/
V-shaped rows
Gelidiella feldmannii’ Baardseth
[55,56]
Tristan da Cunha/Tristan da Cunha≤15/
irregular, opposite at right angles to pinnate up to two orders
thin, terete, or flattenedn.d.
5–12
few in the
medulla
n.d.n.d.present/
V-shaped rows
n.d.: no data available.
Our newly generated sequences formed a distinct monophyletic lineage indicating a separate and undescribed entity. Phylogenetic trees showed a distant relationship of Pterocladiella canariensis with any other currently sequenced species or the undescribed species molecularly differentiated by Boo et al. [19]. The new species is placed outside the large clade of all remaining species of Pterocladiella; based on the cox1 and rbcL + cox1 analyses it appears to be only linked to P. feldmannii and P. hamelii from Madagascar [2], in a heterogeneous set of early diverging species. The morphological characteristics of these species are compared in Table 1. P. caespitosa (type locality: Isipingo Beach, near Durban, South Africa) differs by thin, slightly compressed to flattened unbranched erect axes, or irregularly branched up to two orders, internal rhizoidal filaments numerous in the central medulla, and bigger rounded outer cortical cells [57]. P feldmannii (type locality: Nord-Est du phare d’Evatra, Madagascar) differs by plants of terete axes up to 60 mm with opposite to irregular branches, bigger polygonal outer cortical cells, internal rhizoidal filaments congested in the medulla and tetrasporangial sori without sterile margins and irregular arrangement of tetrasporangia [2]. Finally, P. hamelii (type locality: Lavanono, Madagascar) differs by plants up to 30 mm in height, erect, thin and compressed axes, simple or irregularly branched, outer cortical cells bigger ovoid to rounded, and tetrasporangia irregularly arranged or in horizontal rows [2].
A recent multigene time-calibrated phylogeny and ancestral area reconstruction have indicated that Pterocladiella most likely originated during the Early Cretaceous in the Tethys Sea, and ancient Tethyan vicariance and long-distance dispersal have shaped current distribution patterns [19]. An analysis of the geographic distribution of Pterocladiella species, based on specimens for which sequence data are available, has also shown that more than 81% of the species can be considered endemic since they have very restricted distributions [19], with the highest species diversity found in the Central and Western Indo-Pacific, whereas in other regions such as the eastern Atlantic species diversity was lower [19]. The finding of P. canariensis, so far only known from the type locality, increases the Pterocladiella diversity in the eastern Atlantic and it is in agreement with the thesis of a high proportion of endemic elements in this genus. The group of early diverging species (P. caespitosa, P. feldmannii, and P. hamelii) all with very restricted distributions, to which P. canariensis is now added could represent Tethyan relicts, such as those suggested by Boo et al. [19].
In recent years, as a result of environmental and human factors, numerous studies are showing a drastic decline in some species of Canarian marine algae that are at risk of extinction [58,59,60,61]. Simultaneously, undescribed algal species continue to be discovered [62,63,64], proof that current knowledge of the marine diversity of the Canary Islands is still incomplete, and that it is possible that part of the diversity is being lost when it has not yet been properly identified and catalogued.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Taxon Sampling and Morphological Analyses

Epilithic specimens were collected growing on rocky substrates as dense turf-like communities in low-light habitats in the lower eulittoral at El Médano, Tenerife (Canary Islands). Specimens were preserved in 4% formalin seawater for morphological studies, and/or pressed as herbarium sheets, and desiccated in silica-gel for molecular analysis. Selected fragments and hand sections were stained with 1% aniline blue acidified with 1% HCl, mounted in 50% Karo (Best Foods, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA) corn syrup solution, and examined using a Leica EZ4 stereomicroscope (Germany) and Zeiss microscope (Germany). Voucher specimens and microscopic slides were deposited in the Herbarium of the University of La Laguna, Spain (TFC) as follows: El Médano (Tenerife, Canary Islands): coll. J. Reyes and M. Sansón 02 March 1991, sporophytes and female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 7334); coll. J. Reyes and M. Sansón 14 May 1991, sporophytes, male and female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 7661, 7662); coll. N. Rancel and M. Sansón 02 October 2007, sporophytes (TFC Phyc 14119), female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14120) and male gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14121); coll. N. Rancel, A. Tronholm and J. Rojo 13 November 2007, sporophytes (TFC Phyc 14122), female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14123) and male gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14124); coll. A. Tronholm and J. Rojo 14 December 2007, sporophytes (TFC Phyc 14125), female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14126) and male gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14127); coll. J. Rojo and V. Ramón 15 April 2008, sporophytes (TFC Phyc 14128), female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14129) and male gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14130); coll. J. Rojo and L. Porzio 25 May 2008, sporophytes (TFC Phyc 14190), female gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14191), and male gametophytes (TFC Phyc 14192). Herbarium abbreviations follow Thiers [65]. Photomicrographs were made with a Nikon Coolpix 4600 digital camera (Japan) attached to a Zeiss microscope.

4.2. DNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Analyses

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerPlant Pro Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and subsequently purified with the Wizard® DNA Clean-Up System (Promega Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Amplification of the rbcL and cox1 genes was conducted following the PCR conditions and primers outlined in Freshwater and Rueness [66], and Geraldino et al. [67]. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT™ PCR Product Cleanup Reagent (Applied Biosystems™ by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and sent for sequencing to Eurofins Genomics LLC (Louisville, KY, USA). Sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank and are publicly available under the following accession numbers: OQ216580 (rbcL) and xxxxxxx (cox1). Taxon sampling consisted of the newly generated sequences and a selection of sequences publicly available from GenBank (see Supplementary Table S1). Sequences were aligned using SeaView 4.7 [68], and phylogenies of rbcL and cox1 datasets were reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). The best-fitting nucleotide substitution model was selected using jModelTest v. 2.1.10 [69], with Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). ML analyses were performed using RaxML v8.2.10 [70], set as follows: a rapid bootstrap analysis and search for the best-scoring ML tree in one single run with 1000 bootstrap replicates under GTR+G+I model. The BI analyses were performed for individual datasets with MrBayes v3.2.7 [71], using the Metropolis-coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MC3) with the GTR+G+I model. For each matrix, 100 million generations of two independent runs were performed with four chains and sampling trees every one hundred generations. Twenty-five percent of saved trees were removed as burn-in using Tracer version 1.7 [72], and the remaining trees were used to infer Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Both methods were implemented using the Cyber Infrastructure for Phylogenetic Research (CIPRES Science gateway web server) [73].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12020416/s1, Table S1: List of published sequences with accession numbers used in the molecular analyses [74].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C. and M.S.; methodology, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C., M.S. and A.T.; software, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C., M.S. and A.T.; validation, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C., M.S. and A.T.; formal analysis, N.M.R.-R.; investigation, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C. and M.S.; resources, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C., M.S. and A.T.; writing—review and editing, N.M.R.-R., J.A.-C., M.S. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank all collectors that contributed to this study. A.T. thanks F. Paul for lab assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sohrabipour, J.; Lim, P.E.; Maggs, C.A.; Phang, S.M. Two new species and two new records of Pterocladiella (Gelidiales) from Malaysia based on analyses of rbcL and cox1 gene sequences. Phycologia 2013, 52, 517–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Boo, G.H.; Le Gall, L.; Hwang, I.K.; Boo, S.M. Pterocladiella feldmannii sp. nov. and P. hamelii sp. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta), two new species uncovered in Madagascar during the Atimo Vatae expedition. Cryptogam. Algol. 2016, 37, 179–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patarra, R.F.; Iha, C.; Pereira, L.; Neto, A.I. Concise review of the species Pterocladiella capillacea (S.G.Gmelin) Santelices & Hommersand. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 787–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Santelices, B.; Hommersand, M. Pterocladiella, a new genus in the Gelidiaceae (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 1997, 36, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Freshwater, D.W.; Fredericq, S.; Hommersand, M.H. A molecular phylogeny of the Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) based on the analysis of plastid rbcL nucleotide sequences. J. Phycol. 1995, 31, 616–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hommersand, M.H.; Fredericq, S. Vegetative and reproductive development of Pterocladia capillacea (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) from La Jolla, California. Nova Hedwig. Beih. 1996, 112, 147–160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Santelices, B. The sexual reproductive development of Pterocladiella bulbosa (Loomis) comb. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogam. Algol. 1997, 18, 297–307. [Google Scholar]
  8. Santelices, B. Taxonomic review of the species of Pterocladia (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). J. Appl. Phycol. 1998, 10, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Santelices, B. Testing the usefulness of attachment structures in the taxonomy of small-sized gelidioids. Phycologia 2007, 46, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thomas, D.T.; Freshwater, D.W. Studies of Costa Rican Gelidiales (Rhodophyta): Four Caribbean taxa including Pterocladiella beachii sp. nov. Phycologia 2001, 40, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xia, B.M.; Tseng, C.K.; Wang, Y.Q. Studies on Chinese species of Gelidiella and Pterocladiella (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). Hydrobiologia 2004, 512, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tronchin, E.M.; Freshwater, D.W. Four Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) new to Southern Africa, Aphanta pachyrrhiza gen. et sp. nov., Gelidium profundum sp. nov., Pterocladiella caerulescens and P. psammophila sp. nov. Phycologia 2007, 46, 325–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Freshwater, D.W.; Tudor, K.; O’Shaughnessy, K.; Wysor, B. DNA barcoding in the red algal Order Gelidiales: Comparison of COI with rbcL and verification of the “barcoding gap”. Cryptogam. Algol. 2010, 31, 435–449. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boo, G.H.; Geraldino, P.J.L. Pterocladiella maribagoensis (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta), a new marine alga from Cebu, Philippines. Phytotaxa 2016, 288, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Boo, G.H.; Calderon, M.S.; Boo, S.M. A new marine alga, Pterocladiella andresii sp. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) and its relationship to P. caloglossoides from Pacific South America. Phytotaxa 2017, 319, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.L.; Yan, S.H.; Wang, Y.Q.; Sun, Z.M.; Xia, B.M.; Wang, G.C. Study of the phylogeny and distribution of Pterocladiella (Pterocladiaceae, Rhodophyta) from China. Phycologia 2020, 59, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yan, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, G. Pterocladiella xiae sp. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta), a new species from southern China. Phycologia 2022, 61, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 27 September 2022).
  19. Boo, G.H.; Leliaert, F.; Le Gall, L.; Coppejans, E.; De Clerck, O.; Van Nguyen, T.; Payri, C.E.; Miller, K.A.; Yoon, H.S. Ancient Tethyan vicariance and long-distance dispersal drive global diversification and cryptic speciation in the red seaweed Pterocladiella. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 849476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodríguez-Prieto, C.; Ballesteros, E.; Boisset, F.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. Guía de Las Macroalgas y Fanerógamas Marinas del Mediterráneo Occidental; Omega: Barcelona, Spain, 2013; pp. 1–656. [Google Scholar]
  21. Maggs, C.A.; Guiry, M.D. Gelidiella calcicola sp. nov. (Rhodophyta) from the British Isles and northern France. Br. Phycol. J. 1987, 22, 417–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Díaz-Tapia, P.; Bárbara, I. Seaweeds from sand-covered rocks of the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula. Part 2. Palmariales, Ceramiales (excluding Rhodomelaceae), Gelidiales, Gigartinales, Plocamiales, Rhodymeniales and Scytothamniales. Cryptogam. Algol. 2014, 35, 157–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Sansón, M. Algas, Hongos y Fanerógamas Marinas de las Islas Canarias. Clave Analítica; Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Laguna: La Laguna, Spain, 1999; pp. 1–254. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gallardo, T.; Bárbara, I.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Bermejo, R.; Altamirano, M.; Gómez Garreta, A.; Barceló Martí, M.C.; Rull Lluch, J.; Ballesteros, E.; De la Rosa, J. Nueva lista crítica de las algas bentónicas marinas de España. A new checklist of benthic marine algae of Spain. Algas. Bol. Inf. Soc. Esp. Ficol. 2016, 51, 7–52. [Google Scholar]
  25. Alfonso, B.; Sangil, C.; Sansón, M. Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) in the Canary Islands: Previous studies and future perspectives. Sci. Insularum 2019, 2, 153–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elejabeitia, Y.; Reyes, J.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. Algas marinas bentónicas de Punta del Hidalgo, Tenerife (Islas Canarias). Vieraea 1992, 21, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinedo, S.; Sansón, M.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. Algas marinas bentónicas de Puerto de la Cruz (antes Puerto Orotava), Tenerife (Islas Canarias). Vieraea 1992, 21, 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reyes, J.; Sansón, M.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. Notes on some interesting marine algae new from the Canary Islands. Crypt. Bot. 1993, 4, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rancel, N.; Sansón, M.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Tronholm, A. Morfología reproductora y vegetativa de Pterocladiella melanoidea (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) en las Islas Canarias. In Proceedings of the XV Simposio Ibérico de Estudios de Biología Marina (SIEBM), Funchal, Portugal, 9 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rancel, N.; Sansón, M.; Afonso-Carrillo, J. Development of carposporophyte in Pterocladiella melanoidea (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta): An intermediate pattern between Pterocladia and Pterocladiella. Phycologia 2009, 48, 110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Millar, A.J.K.; Freshwater, D.W. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of the marine algal order Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) from New South Wales, including Lord Howe and Norfolk Island. Aust. Syst. Bot. 2005, 18, 215–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boo, G.H.; Le Gall, L.; Miller, K.A.; Freshwater, D.W.; Wernberg, T.; Terada, R.; Yoon, K.J.; Boo, S.M. A novel phylogeny of the Gelidiales (Rhodophyta) based on five genes including the nuclear CesA, with descriptions of Orthogonacladia gen. nov. and Orthogonacladiaceae fam. nov. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 101, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Boo, G.H.; Le Gall, L.; Hwang, I.K.; Rousseau, F.; Yoon, H.S. Species Diversity of Gelidium from Southern Madagascar Evaluated by an Integrative Taxonomic Approach. Diversity 2022, 14, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boo, G.H.; Nguyen, T.V.; Kim, J.Y.; Le Gall, L.; Rico, J.M.; Bottalico, A.; Boo, S.M. A revised classification of the Gelidiellaceae (Rhodophyta) with descriptions of three new genera: Huismaniella, Millerella and Perronella. Taxon 2016, 65, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Iha, C.; Freshwater, D.W.; Guimarães, S.M.P.B.; Oliveira, M.C. Gelidiorariphycus gen. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta): A rare genus found in the Americas. Phycologia 2022, 61, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perrone, C.; Felicini, G.P.; Bottalico, A. The prostrate system of the Gelidiales: Diagnostic and taxonomic importance. Bot. Mar. 2006, 49, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boo, S.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Hong, I.S.; Hwang, I.K. Reexamination of the genus Pterocladiella (Gelidiaceae, Rhodophyta) in Korea based on morphology and rbcL sequences. Algae 2010, 25, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boo, G.H.; Hughey, J.R.; Miller, K.A.; Boo, S.M. Mitogenomes from type specimens, a genotyping tool for morphologically simple species: Ten genomes of agar-producing red algae. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Iha, C.; Jamas, M.; Guimaraes, S.M.P.B.; Fujii, M.T.; Freshwater, D.W.; Oliviera, M.C. Pterocladiella (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) species of Brazil including morphological studies of Pterocladiella media and a reassessment of Pterocladiella taylorii. Phycologia 2017, 56, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pezzolesi, L.; Peña, V.; Le Gall, L.; Gabrielson, P.W.; Kaleb, S.; Hughey, J.R.; Rodondi, G.; Hernández-Kantun, J.J.; Falace, A.; Basso, D.; et al. Mediterranean Lithophyllum stictiforme (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) is a genetically diverse species complex: Implications for species circumscription, biogeography and conservation of coralligenous habitats. J. Phycol. 2019, 55, 473–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leliaert, F.; Payo, D.A.; Gurgel, C.F.D.; Shils, T.; Draisma, S.G.A.; Saunders, G.W.; Kamiya, M.; Sherwood, A.R.; Lin, S.M.; Huisman, J.M.; et al. Patterns and drivers of species diversity in the Indo-Pacific red seaweed Portieria. J. Biogeogr. 2018, 45, 2299–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Díaz-Tapia, P.; Ly, M.; Verbruggen, H. Extensive cryptic diversity in the widely distributed Polysiphonia scopulorum (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta): Molecular species delimitation and morphometric analyses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2020, 152, 106909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gabrielson, P.W.; Hughey, J.R.; Diaz-Pulido, G. Genomics reveals abundant speciation in the coral reef building alga Porolithon onkodes (Corallinales, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 2018, 54, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Richards, J.L.; Sauvage, T.; Schmidt, W.E.; Fredericq, S.; Hughey, J.R.; Gabrielson, P.W. The coralline genera Sporolithon and Heydrichia (Sporolithales, Rhodophyta) clarified by sequencing type material of their generitypes and other species. J. Phycol. 2017, 53, 1044–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bornet, E.; Schousboe, P.K.A. Les algues de P.-K.-A. Schousboe: Récoltées au Maroc & dans la Méditerranée de 1815 à 1829; Masson, G., Bornet, E., Schousboe, P.K.A., Eds.; Nabu Press: Charleston, SC, USA, 1892; pp. 165–376. [Google Scholar]
  46. Feldmann, J.; Hamel, G. Floridées de France VII. Gélidiales. Rev. Algol. 1936, 9, 85–140. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hommersand, M.H.; Fredericq, S. An investigation of cystocarp development in Gelidium pteridifolium with a revised description of the Gelidiales (Rhodophyta). Phycologia 1988, 27, 254–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huisman, J.M.; Boo, G.H.; Boo, S.M. Gelidiales. In Algae of Australia. Marine Benthic Algae of North-Western Australia. 2. Red algae; Huisman, J.M., Ed.; ABRS and CSIRO Publishing: Canberra, Australia, 2018; pp. 245–264. [Google Scholar]
  49. De Gregorio, S.; Dibari, S.; Perrone, C. Fertile plants of Pterocladia melanoidea (Rhodophyta, Gelidiales) on the Apulian coasts (Mediterranean Sea). Giorn. Bot. Ital. 1995, 129, 1262–1266. [Google Scholar]
  50. Fredriksen, S.; Rueness, J. Culture studies on Pterocladia melanoidea (Schousboe ex Bornet) comb. nov. (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 1990, 29, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bárbara, I.; Díaz-Tapia, P. New records and additions to the seaweeds of France. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2012, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cormaci, M.; Furnari, G.; Alongi, G. Flora marina bentonica del Mediterraneo: Rhodophyta–Rhodymeniophycidae I. Acrosymphytales, Bonnemaisoniales, Gelidiales, Gigartinales, Gracilariales. Boll. Accad. Gioenia Nat. Sci 2020, 53, 11–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dawson, E.Y. Notes on Pacific coast marine algae, VII. Bull. So. Cal. Acad. Sci. 1958, 57, 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  54. Feldmann, J.; Hamel, G. Observations sur quelques Gélidiacées. Rev. Gén. Bot. 1934, 46, 528–549. [Google Scholar]
  55. Saunders, G.W.; Brooks, C.M.; Scott, S. Preliminary DNA barcode report on the marine red algae (Rhodophyta) from the British Overseas Territory of Tristan da Cunha. Cryptogamie Algol. 2019, 40, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Baardseth, E. The marine algae of Tristan da Cunha. In Results of the Norwegian Scientific Expedition to Tristan Da Cunha; Dybwad, J., Ed.; Det Norske Videnskaps Akademi: Oslo, Sweden, 1937; pp. 1–172. [Google Scholar]
  57. Norris, R.E. The marine red algae of Natal, South Africa: Order Gelidiales (Rhodophyta). Mem. Bot. Surv. S. Afr. 1992, 61, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  58. Martínez, B.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Anadón, R.; Araújo, R.; Arenas, F.; Arrontes, J.; Bárbara, I.; Borja, A.; Díez, I.; Duarte, L.; et al. Regresión de las algas marinas en las islas Canarias y en la costa atlántica de la Península Ibérica por efecto del cambio climático. Algas. Bol. Inf. Soc. Esp. Ficol. 2015, 49, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  59. Afonso-Carrillo, J. Tiempos de profundas transformaciones en los paisajes submarinos del litoral canario. In Reflexiones Medioambientales en Tiempos de un Coronavirus; Afonso-Carrillo, J., Ed.; Instituto de Estudios Hispánicos de Canarias: Puerto de la Cruz, Spain, 2021; pp. 41–88. [Google Scholar]
  60. Alfonso, B.; Hernández, J.C.; Sangil, C.; Martín, L.; Expósito, F.J.; Díaz, J.P.; Sansón, M. Fast climatic changes place an endemic Canary Island macroalga at extinction risk. Reg. Environ. Change 2021, 113, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martín García, L.; Rancel-Rodríguez, N.M.; Sangil, C.; Reyes, J.; Benito, B.M.; Orellana, S.; Sansón, M. Environmental and human factors drive the subtropical marine forests of Gongolaria abies-marina to extinction. Mar. Environ. Res. 2022, 181, 105759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rodríguez-Prieto, C.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; De Clerck, O.; Huisman, J.M.; Lin, S.M. Systematic revision of the foliose Halymeniaceae (Halymeniales, Rhodophyta) from Europe, with the description of Halymenia ballesterosii sp. nov. from the Mediterranean Sea and Nesoia hommersandii from the Canary Islands. Eur. J. Phycol. 2020, 55, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vieira, C.; Henriques, F.; D’hondt, S.; Neto, A.I.; Almada, C.H.; Kaufmann, M.; Sansón, M.; Sangil, C.; De Clerck, O. Lobophora (Dictyotales) species richness, ecology and biogeography across the North-eastern Atlantic archipelagos and description of two new species. J. Phycol. 2020, 56, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rodríguez-Buján, I.; Pimentel, M.; Díaz-Tapia, P. Melanothamnus macaronesicus Rodríguez-Buján & Díaz-Tapia, sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta): A new turf-forming species from the Azores and the Canary Islands. Cryptogam. Algol. 2021, 42, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Available online: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  66. Freshwater, D.W.; Rueness, J. Phylogenetic relationships of some European Gelidium (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) species, based on rbcL nucleotide sequence analysis. Phycologia 1994, 33, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Geraldino, P.J.L.; Yang, E.C.; Bu, S.M. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Hypnea flexicaulis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Korea. Algae 2006, 21, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gouy, M.; Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.E.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J.; Xie, D.; Baele, G.; Suchard, M.A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Org. Divers. Evol. 2010, 10, 311–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. García-Jiménez, P.; Robaina, R.R. Effects of ethylene on tetrasporogenesis in Pterocladiella capillacea (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 710–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of forty-five (1397 bp) rbcL sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of forty-five (1397 bp) rbcL sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Plants 12 00416 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of 38 (1337 bp) cox1 sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of 38 (1337 bp) cox1 sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Plants 12 00416 g002
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood (ML) concatenated tree of 35 (2686 bp) cox1 and rbcL sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood (ML) concatenated tree of 35 (2686 bp) cox1 and rbcL sequences calculated using the GTR+I+G evolution model. ML bootstrap values ≥ 60 and Bayesian inference posterior probability values ≥ 0.8 are shown for each branch. Black bold lines indicate full support in both analyses.
Plants 12 00416 g003
Figure 4. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Habitat of P. canariensis, growing as turf-like tufts on rocky substrates; (B) holotype, preserved as a dry herbarium specimen (TFC Phyc 16400); (CF) morphological variability of fresh specimens with branched erect axes arising from prostrate axes: (C) cystocarpic female gametophyte; (D) male gametophyte; (E,F) tetrasporophytes; (G) terete prostrate axes (stolon) with numerous holdfasts; (H) mature holdfast arising oppositely to the upright axis and ended by a small disc; (I) peg-like holdfast with acute end showing free rhizoidal filaments. Scale bar: 4 cm (A), 5 mm (BF), 500 µm (G), and 300 µm (H,I).
Figure 4. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Habitat of P. canariensis, growing as turf-like tufts on rocky substrates; (B) holotype, preserved as a dry herbarium specimen (TFC Phyc 16400); (CF) morphological variability of fresh specimens with branched erect axes arising from prostrate axes: (C) cystocarpic female gametophyte; (D) male gametophyte; (E,F) tetrasporophytes; (G) terete prostrate axes (stolon) with numerous holdfasts; (H) mature holdfast arising oppositely to the upright axis and ended by a small disc; (I) peg-like holdfast with acute end showing free rhizoidal filaments. Scale bar: 4 cm (A), 5 mm (BF), 500 µm (G), and 300 µm (H,I).
Plants 12 00416 g004
Figure 5. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Attenuated apex with prominent apical cell (arrow); (B) obtuse apex showing a slightly protruding apical cell (arrow); (C) obtuse apex showing an apical cell (arrow); (D) apical cell (arrow) in a depression between cortical lobes; (E) transverse section of an erect axis through its attenuated and rounded basal portion showing the central row of non-pigmented thick-walled axial cell (a), periaxial cells (p), and second-order filament cells (s). Three to four layers of cortical cells (c) surround the central row. Some internal rhizoidal filaments (arrows) occur between the inner cortical cells; (F) transverse section of the distal flattened erect axis showing a central row of hyaline cells (arrows), and three layers of cortical cells (c); (G) longitudinal section of the flattened erect axis showing the axial filament (arrows), surrounded by the cortex; (H) surface view of an erect axis showing the irregular arrangement of the outer cortical cells. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 5. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Attenuated apex with prominent apical cell (arrow); (B) obtuse apex showing a slightly protruding apical cell (arrow); (C) obtuse apex showing an apical cell (arrow); (D) apical cell (arrow) in a depression between cortical lobes; (E) transverse section of an erect axis through its attenuated and rounded basal portion showing the central row of non-pigmented thick-walled axial cell (a), periaxial cells (p), and second-order filament cells (s). Three to four layers of cortical cells (c) surround the central row. Some internal rhizoidal filaments (arrows) occur between the inner cortical cells; (F) transverse section of the distal flattened erect axis showing a central row of hyaline cells (arrows), and three layers of cortical cells (c); (G) longitudinal section of the flattened erect axis showing the axial filament (arrows), surrounded by the cortex; (H) surface view of an erect axis showing the irregular arrangement of the outer cortical cells. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Plants 12 00416 g005
Figure 6. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Two terminal tetrasporangial sori in lateral branchlets; (B) tetrasporangial sorus with sterile margin and tetrasporangia arranged in V-shaped rows; (C) surface view of rows of tetrasporangia (arrows) surrounded by outer cortical cells; (D) transverse section of an erect axis through a tetrasporangial sorus showing cruciate to decussately divided tetrasporangia (arrows) and empty cavities after tetrasporangia release (arrowheads); (E) spermatangial sori terminal in an erect axis and on shorth lateral branchlets; (F) spermatangial sorus with sterile margin; (G) surface view of spermatangial sorus showing pigmented outer cortical cells of the sterile margin (arrow) and densely packed hyaline spermatangia (arrowheads); (H) transverse section through a spermatangial sorus showing spermatangia arranged on both sides of the fertile branch (arrows); (I) two terminal fertile carpogonial axes showing longitudinal hyaline grooves starting from the apex (arrows); (J) branchlet with longitudinal hyaline groove (arrow) with lateral branch in which a cystocarp has developed (arrowhead); (KN) successive phases of development of the cystocarp showing rounded nutritive cells (n) on both sides of the axial cell (a) and the central row (arrows) and the placental tissue attached to the cystocarp floor; (O) surface view of a mature cystocarp (arrow); (P) transverse section through a mature cystocarp showing the basal arrangement of placental tissue and the cavity occupied by nutritive filaments (n) and gonimoblastic filaments with terminal carposporangia (c). Scale bar: 300 µm (A,E,F,I,J,O), 100 µm (B,N,P), and 50 µm (C,D,G,H,KM).
Figure 6. Pterocladiella canariensis sp. nov. (A) Two terminal tetrasporangial sori in lateral branchlets; (B) tetrasporangial sorus with sterile margin and tetrasporangia arranged in V-shaped rows; (C) surface view of rows of tetrasporangia (arrows) surrounded by outer cortical cells; (D) transverse section of an erect axis through a tetrasporangial sorus showing cruciate to decussately divided tetrasporangia (arrows) and empty cavities after tetrasporangia release (arrowheads); (E) spermatangial sori terminal in an erect axis and on shorth lateral branchlets; (F) spermatangial sorus with sterile margin; (G) surface view of spermatangial sorus showing pigmented outer cortical cells of the sterile margin (arrow) and densely packed hyaline spermatangia (arrowheads); (H) transverse section through a spermatangial sorus showing spermatangia arranged on both sides of the fertile branch (arrows); (I) two terminal fertile carpogonial axes showing longitudinal hyaline grooves starting from the apex (arrows); (J) branchlet with longitudinal hyaline groove (arrow) with lateral branch in which a cystocarp has developed (arrowhead); (KN) successive phases of development of the cystocarp showing rounded nutritive cells (n) on both sides of the axial cell (a) and the central row (arrows) and the placental tissue attached to the cystocarp floor; (O) surface view of a mature cystocarp (arrow); (P) transverse section through a mature cystocarp showing the basal arrangement of placental tissue and the cavity occupied by nutritive filaments (n) and gonimoblastic filaments with terminal carposporangia (c). Scale bar: 300 µm (A,E,F,I,J,O), 100 µm (B,N,P), and 50 µm (C,D,G,H,KM).
Plants 12 00416 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rancel-Rodríguez, N.M.; Afonso-Carrillo, J.; Tronholm, A.; Sansón, M. A New Species from the Canary Islands Increases the Diversity of the Red Algal Genus Pterocladiella in the Northeastern Atlantic. Plants 2023, 12, 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020416

AMA Style

Rancel-Rodríguez NM, Afonso-Carrillo J, Tronholm A, Sansón M. A New Species from the Canary Islands Increases the Diversity of the Red Algal Genus Pterocladiella in the Northeastern Atlantic. Plants. 2023; 12(2):416. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rancel-Rodríguez, Nereida M., Julio Afonso-Carrillo, Ana Tronholm, and Marta Sansón. 2023. "A New Species from the Canary Islands Increases the Diversity of the Red Algal Genus Pterocladiella in the Northeastern Atlantic" Plants 12, no. 2: 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020416

APA Style

Rancel-Rodríguez, N. M., Afonso-Carrillo, J., Tronholm, A., & Sansón, M. (2023). A New Species from the Canary Islands Increases the Diversity of the Red Algal Genus Pterocladiella in the Northeastern Atlantic. Plants, 12(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop