Next Article in Journal
Optimization of the In Vitro Proliferation of an Ancient Pear Tree Cultivar (‘Decana d’inverno’) through the Use of Neem Oil
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Glycine Betaine on Nitrogen and Polyamine Metabolisms, Expression of Glycoside-Related Biosynthetic Enzymes, and K/Na Balance of Stevia under Salt Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Antitumor and Antioxidant Activities of In Vitro Cultivated and Wild-Growing Clinopodium vulgare L. Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Foliar Application of Hydrogen Peroxide Macroconcentrations on Growth Parameters, Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity in the Leaves and Seeds of Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses of Aroma Related Metabolic Attributes of Opisthopappus longilobus Flowers to Environmental Changes

College of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2023, 12(8), 1592; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081592
Submission received: 19 February 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 April 2023 / Published: 10 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Metabolic Responses to Biotic and Abiotic Stress)

Abstract

:
Opisthopappus longilobus (Opisthopappus) and its descendant species, Opisthopappus taihangensis, commonly thrive on the Taihang Mountains of China. Being typical cliff plants, both O. longilobus and O. taihangensis release unique aromatics. To determine the potential differentiation and environmental response patterns, comparative metabolic analysis was performed on O. longilobus wild flower (CLW), O. longilobus transplant flower (CLT), and O. taihangensis wild flower (TH) groups. Significant differences in the metabolic profiles were found, not within O. longilobus, but between O. longilobus and O. taihangensis flowers. Within these metabolites, twenty-eight substances related to the scents were obtained (one alkene, two aldehydes, three esters, eight phenols, three acids, three ketones, three alcohols, and five flavonoids), of which eugenol and chlorogenic were the primary aromatic molecules and enriched in the phenylpropane pathway. Network analysis showed that close relationships occurred among identified aromatic substances. The variation coefficient (CV) of aromatic metabolites in O. longilobus was lower than O. taihangensis. The aromatic related compounds were significantly correlated with the lowest temperatures in October and in December of the sampled sites. The results indicated that phenylpropane, particularly eugenol and chlorogenic, played important roles in the responses of O. longilobus species to environmental changes.

1. Introduction

The metabolic processes of organisms are dynamic and complex systems that are regulated by multiple factors [1]. From the most upstream genomic DNA and mRNA, and from proteins to traits, organisms continually adjust their metabolic responses and metabolites to maintain a dynamic balance between their internal and external environments [2]. All reactions, from genes to traits, are the final comprehensive result of the co-regulation of genes and the external environment [3]. Thus, changes in the metabolites of organisms, the relationships between them, and their external manifestations are essential for elucidating their adaptations and evolutionary processes [4]. Conversely, metabolic data can more accurately reflect the physiological status and phenotypic presence of plants while clearly identifying minor changes in genetic and protein expression [2].
At different growth stages, differences in the metabolic activities of plants can facilitate the exploration and tracking of changing metabolite distribution patterns [5]. Based on the differences and interactions between metabolites, environmental influences on the metabolites of plants, as well as their adaptive pathways and metabolic networks, may be inferred [6].
Generally, continuous and dynamic changes in the environment typically result in adaptions by plants [7]. These adaptations involve the production and accumulation of a diverse set of metabolites, ranging from signaling hormones and primary metabolites to a wide array of specialized multifunctional metabolites [8,9]. When plants are subject to environmental stress, specialized metabolites can improve their protection and competitiveness for survival [10]. Under different environments, the growth and development of plants can be modified by changing environmental factors [11]. Plants can regulate different signaling pathways by controlling the expression of genes, thus impacting metabolic levels and responding to habitat changes [12]. The synthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites involve very complex processes that are affected by genetic, developmental, and environmental factors [13]. The secondary metabolism of plant flowers in different habitats were significantly different due to the influences of habitat heterogeneity [14].
In the aspect of the relationships between plant metabolism and the environment, different models have been proposed. Some plants synthesize and accumulate metabolites regardless of their environment. However, for most plants, the synthesis and accumulation of metabolites are altered with changes in the environment [15]. Plants typically allocate various types and quantities of metabolites in response to specific environmental changes. They either synthesize particular metabolites or significantly increase their concentrations under certain environmental conditions [16]. For example, the volatile secondary metabolites of insect repellents in cotton are synthesized after being stimulated by insects, rather than prior to being synthesized and stored [17].
During the growth and development of plants, myriad environmental influences can impact the synthesis and accumulation of metabolites, including biological and abiotic factors [17,18]. Further, the effects of environmental factors on plant metabolism are very complex. The synthesis and accumulation of one type of metabolite can be induced by several environmental factors, whereas one type of environmental factor can induce the synthesis and accumulation of multiple metabolites [19]. Identical environmental factors may also have distinct effects on different plants [20]. Although any environmental factor may affect the metabolism of plants for various species under different natural conditions, the degree of influence can vary [20,21].
Opisthopappus longilobus, belongs to the genus Opisthopappus, which is mainly distributed in the Hebei Provinces of China [22]. This species grows on the slopes or cliffs of the Taihang Mountains. It is a typical cliff plant [23] and possesses good cold and drought resistance [24]. O. longilobus is rich in aromatic oils with a strong and persistent fragrance and has high ornamental and medicinal value [25,26].
Within the Opisthopappus genus, Opisthopappus taihangensis is another cliff residing species that is primarily located in Henan Province, China. Based on our previous study, O. taihangensis is regarded as a descendant of O. longilobus. They diverged during the early Miocene under differing precipitation regimes due to the intensification of the Asian monsoon [27].
Though the two species present a significant genetic differentiation [22], they exhibit morphological similarities under different habitats [27]. The morphological differentiation occurred only in the leaf segmentation pattern with or without bracts [27,28]. Through field investigations, we observed that the flowers of the two species evolved some morphological differentiation. The inflorescence diameter, tubular flower diameter, ligule length, ligule width, number of ligules, and number of tubular flowers of O. taihangensis were larger than those of O. longilobus. The petal color of O. taihangensis primarily appeared pink and then changed to white, while that of O. longilobus occasionally presented as pink at the end of the flowering cycle.
Apart from this, the flowers of both O. longilobus and O. taihangensis can release unique and potent odors. The aromatic elements of plants generally consist of secondary metabolites. It is uncertain as to whether the metabolites and metabolic pathways of the O. longilobus ancestor were identical to those of O. taihangensis descendant flowers. If there was any differentiation, what were the key aromatic metabolites involved pathways and associated genes? Under these differentiations, what were the potential mechanisms, and were the adaptive responses to the disruptions caused by different habitats?
To answer the above questions, we initially identified the types of metabolites involved in the flowers of the two species (compared O. longilobus wild flowers, O. longilobus transplant flowers, and O. taihangensis wild flowers). Subsequently, the different aromatic metabolites and metabolic pathways were comparatively analyzed between the O. longilobus ancestor and O. taihangensis descendant. Finally, the potential mechanisms of O. longilobus in response to heterogeneous habitats were elucidated.

2. Results

2.1. Total Metabolism of the Flowers

In the flower metabolites, a total of 95,655 features were detected in the positive ion mode, and 36,478 features were detected in the negative ion mode. 5439 metabolites were obtained in the positive and negative ion mode, which accounted for 97.6% of those of the flowers. Based on quantitative analysis, 14,262 and 10,004 high-quality substances were obtained in the positive and negative ion modes, respectively.
Among the 3 groups, 14,713 substances were shared through the screened Venn diagram (Figure 1), in which there were 1954 metabolites between CLW and CLT, 1245 between CLW and TH, and 695 between CLT and TH.
There were 638 metabolites that were unique to CLW, 748 to CLT, and 2248 to TH. Significantly distinct metabolic expressions occurred between the CLW, CLT, and TH groups. For the O. longilobus wild flowers and O. longilobus transplant flowers (CLW/CLT), the differential metabolites were upregulated by 919 and downregulated by 1189. The differential metabolites of wild flowers of O. taihangensis and those of O. longilobus (TH/CLW) were upregulated by 4020 and downregulated by 3722. Between TH/CLT, the differential metabolites were upregulated by 2560 and downregulated by 3135.
KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the differential metabolites were enriched into 47 pathways in CLW/CLT, 59 metabolic pathways in TH/CLW, and 61 pathways in TH/CLT (Table A1). Meanwhile, the significantly different metabolic pathways were all involved in secondary plant metabolite biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and arginine biosynthesis between TH/CLT, TH/CLW, and CLW/CLT.

2.2. Detection of Aromatic Compounds

Through the screened secondary metabolic data, a total of 28 non-volatile compounds related to aromatic compounds were identified in the O. longilobus wildflowers (CLW), O. longilobus transplant flowers (CLT), and O. taihangensis wild flowers (TH), including one alkene, two aldehydes, three esters, eight phenols, three acids, three ketones, three alcohols, and five flavonoids. These compounds were chlorogenate, caffeate, carvacrol, thymol, eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, scopoletin, coniferyl aldehyde, trans-2-hydroxycinnamate, 4-hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde, 4-hydroxystyrene, quercetin, vitexin, luteolin 7-O-beta-D-glucoside, chrysoeriol, rutin, syringetin, taxifolin, delphinidin, naringenin chalcone, dioctyl phthalate, p-cresol, 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde, phenyl acetate, 3-nitrophenol, trans-2-hydroxycinnamic acid, and hesperetin, respectively.
Enrichment analysis indicated that 28 identified aromatic compounds were engaged in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, chemical carcinogenesis-receptor activation, bisphenol degradation, toluene degradation, phenylalanine metabolism, and aminobenzoate degradation.
The most highly expressed metabolite for CLT was eugenol (Figure 2 and Table 1), followed by caffeate, carvacrol, thymol, and chlorogenate. The least expressed metabolite was hesperetin.
For CLW, the most highly expressed metabolite was phenyl acetate, followed by chrysoeriol, hesperetin, dioctyl phthalate, and caffeate. The least expressed metabolite was p-Cresol.
In TH, chlorogenate was the most highly expressed metabolite, followed by caffeate, scopoletin, dioctyl phthalate, and syringetin. The least expressed metabolite was p-Cresol. In addition, three groups could be distinguished from each other according to PCA (Figure A1). The overall differences in aromatic substances were obvious among three groups, which indicated that the aromatic compounds in CLT, CLW, and TH were significantly different.

2.3. Coefficient of Variation of Aromatic Compounds

Based on the identified aromatic substances, the coefficients of variation (CV) (Table A2) of fragrance metabolism were calculated. For CLT, the CV value ranged from 0.1 to 48.72, whereas for CLW, it ranged from 0.58 to 55.25, and, for TH, this index ranged from 2.17 to 80.90.
Furthermore, chlorogenic and eugenol had the relatively higher CV values among the identified fragrance metabolites.

2.4. Network Diagram among Fragrance Metabolites

A correlation metabolic network was developed for the odor metabolites (Figure 3). Within the network diagram, closely linked metabolites were found likely involved in the same or related metabolic pathways. Most of the metabolites were relatively well connected, which implied that these aromatic substances were fundamental for the growth and survival of O. longilobus and O. taihangensis.

2.5. Environmental Correlation of Aromatic Substances

To explore the environmental correlation of aromatic substances, we firstly investigate the key environmental factors in each sampled site. Then, the correlation analysis was performed between the identified aromatic substances and environmental factors.
Using the PCA correlation matrix of environmental factors, fourteen variables were primary factors (Table A3). When simultaneously considering the VIF results (Table A3), it was found that two environmental factors, namely the lowest temperatures in October and December, were the most important factors for the sampled sites (Table 2). Thus, the correction analysis was carried out with the two factors.
According to correlation analysis (Table A3 and Table 2), chlorogenic was significantly correlated with the minimum temperature in December, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.72105. Eugenol was significantly correlated with the minimum temperatures in October and December, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficients were 0.88483 and 0.82039, respectively.

3. Discussion

3.1. Different Metabolites of the Flowers

In general, the regulation of primary metabolite allocation can affect fundamental processes such as the growth and development of an organism. In addition, other processes aimed at increasing plant fitness in specific environments are more associated with specialized metabolic processes, such as those involved with protection against herbivores and pathogens, reduction of oxidative stress, or competition with other plants [29]. During various developmental processes, plants need to continuously adjust the distribution of metabolites to maintain growth and survival under changing environments [30].
Within the O. longilobus species, there were obviously different metabolites between CLW and CLT, for example chlorogenate, eugenol, chrysoeriol, syringetin, and hesperetin. These metabolites mainly enriched the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, and arginine biosynthesis (Table 1).
When O. longilobus individuals were transplanted from the wild site to the transplant garden, this species adjusted its metabolic pathways, such as phenylpropane biosynthesis, to respond the changed environment to ensure that its flowers bloomed normally.
For plants, arginine biosynthesis pathway was an important one of metabolites pathways. Within arginine biosynthesis pathways, arginine makes a key function in the regulation of abiotic and biotic stress in plants. When plants are exposed to various abiotic stresses, the expression of arginase genes is not only upregulated but also the enzyme activity is increased. When plants are subjected to biotic stresses, such as insect feeding and pathogen infestation, arginase also displays a significant effect. In addition, arginine promoted root growth and improved the salt tolerance of plants [31].
For O. longilobus and O. taihangensis, the significantly enriched arginine biosynthesis pathway might have affected the florescence development and the tolerance to the various stresses. From the evolutionary viewpoint, the O. taihangensis descendant would occupy different surroundings compared with its O. longilobus ancestor. Through adjusting its metabolites and metabolic pathways, O. taihangensis must ensure its development and survival when facing abiotic and biotic stresses from a novel environment.

3.2. Different Aromatic Substances of the Flowers

Plants produce a diversity of secondary metabolites, while generating and storing an extensive range of volatile organic compounds in their flowers. Typically, aromatic substances are important metabolites in plants for attracting insects, resisting diseases and pests, and adapting to altered habitats [32,33]. Further, the scents attract and repel various pollinators for different pollination processes [34,35].
In the CLW, CLT, and TH groups, the pathways related to flower fragrances were primarily phenylpropanoid, flavone, and flavonol biosynthesis, which are mainly composed of phenylpropanes (such as chlorogenic and eugenol) (Figure 4), which was consistent with the general pattern of the chemical composition of floral scents [36].
Metabolism occurs between phenylpropane metabolism and other secondary metabolic pathways, which maintains a dynamic balance between phenylpropane metabolism and resisting environmental degradation [37]. When downregulated, chlorogenic based metabolites can be metabolized to storage forms such as glycosyl based derivatives or decomposed quinic acid and caffeic acid, and can be further metabolized to more complex molecules such as lignin [38]. These contribute to plant development and plant–environment interactions, and phenylpropanoid-based polymers (such as lignin) are required for mechanical support to facilitate growth and long-distance transport of water and nutrients [39].
Phenylpropanoid homeostasis between the different branches of phenylpropanoid metabolism exhibits extraordinary complexity and a high-level of plasticity during successive developmental stages in response to environmental stimuli and changes [39,40]. Lignin encapsulates carbohydrates composed of cellulose and hemicellulose to form a composite wood fiber barrier to resist the attack and destruction of plant tissues by microorganisms and the surrounding environment [41].
The metabolites of the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway contribute to the upright growth of the plant, allowing it to better photosynthesize. At the same time, the involved metabolites also effectively protect plants from UV light, diseases, and insects for healthy plant growth. Accordingly, the phenylpropanoid pathway would make O. longilobus grow better with the changed habits, ensure its floral development, and maintain its survival and evolution.
Chlorogenic and eugenol are both involved in the phenylpropane pathway. For CLW, CLT, and TH (Figure 4), chlorogenic is upstream and eugenol is downstream. Moreover, the relative substances of synthetic chlorogenic are highly expressed in CLW and CLT (Table 1).
The first step of the chlorogenic metabolic pathway involves the dissociation of ammonia from l-phenylalanine via phenylalanine ammonia lyase and the production of trans-cinnamic acid. This enzyme belongs to the aromatic amino acid lyase family, is the first key enzyme in the phenylpropane pathway [42], and is related to most bioactive metabolites, such as flavonoids and anthocyanins. Meanwhile, the caffeoyl-CoA is the final step in the synthesis of chlorogenic, where 4-coumaryl-CoA ligase is one of the crucial enzymes in the phenylpropane pathway toward the metabolism of other substances, which can catalyze cinnamic acid and its hydroxyl groups. Thus, 4-coumaryl-CoA ligase is of great value in the biosynthesis of phenylpropane compounds such as chlorogenic and flavonoids [43].
Intermediates of the phenylpropane metabolic pathway and their secondary metabolites can not only improve the disease resistance of plants, but also regulate and promote plant resistance to abiotic stresses such as low temperatures, high temperatures, and ultraviolet radiation. This might be an explanation for the difference in floral aromatic substances between two groups (CLW and CLT) of O. longilobus under different surroundings.
Being the main aromatic compound, chlorogenic plays a key role in the attraction of pollinators and against herbivores and pathogens. Further, chlorogenic is produced via the shikimic acid pathway during aerobic respiration, which exhibits anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, and antidepressant pharmacological effects in vitro [44]. In this study, the content of chlorogenic in TH was higher than that of CLT and CLW (Table 1). As the descendant of O. longilobus, additional chlorogenic might induce O. taihangensis to not only attract more and different pollinators to facilitate its reproduction, but also to respond to different environments compared with its ancestor and to better survive and develop. Certainly, higher contents of chlorogenic also may be responsible for the enhanced flower color and relatively different flower size of O. taihangensis in contrast to O. longilobus.
On the other hand, eugenol can attract biological pollinators, facilitate seed transmission, and protect against herbivores [45]. It is an important type of phenylpropane volatile that is commonly found in plant flowers and mature fruits, which possesses a variety of biological and therapeutic effects [13]. Eugenol had the highest content in CLT, followed by CLW (Table 1). When O. longilobus was transplanted into the transplant garden from the wild growth site, eugenol would accumulate to enhance survival under changing environmental conditions. Moreover, eugenol is a semi-volatile phenolic compound derived from plants that has a strong carnation musk odor [46] that creates the different fragrances for O. longilobus different from O. taihangensis.
To adapt to localized environmental conditions, the plants generate many specialized metabolites that contribute to their health and survival and play roles in their capacities [47]. The emission of fragrances from flowers is regulated by metabolic processes [48]. The biosynthesis and emission of floral fragrances are modulated by the stages of flower maturity, circadian rhythms, and by other environmental factors such as temperature [49,50]. Environmental conditions not only influence the vaporization of volatile compounds from flowers, but also their biosynthesis, particularly under different ambient air temperature regimes, which are known to play major roles in the biosynthesis and release of floral fragrances [50,51].
A significant correlation was found between chlorogenic and the minimum temperature in October, and between eugenol and the minimum temperature in October and December. These two environmental factors might directly affect the expression of chlorogenic and eugenol, or indirectly affect the expression of chlorogenic and eugenol synthase. It was reported that low temperatures can induce the expression of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and other phenylpropane metabolism genes [52]. Flower buds could only be formed after low temperature treatment, which may be reasonable for O. longilobus and O. taihangensis species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sample Sites and Materials

The Shennong Mountains inhabit Henan Province, while the Xiangtang Mountains reside in Hebei Province. Both of these mountains occupy branches of the Taihang Mountains Range. Despite the two areas being in the center of the Taihang Mountains, the Xiangtang Mountains are 330 km away from the Shennong Mountains, and the environmental conditions are unique for each. The Shennong Mountains have a warm, temperate continental climate with four distinct seasons. In contrast, the Xiangtang Mountains are home to a warm, temperate, semi-humid, semi-arid continental monsoon climate.
In terms of geographical distribution, the Xiangtang Mountains were a growing area only for O. longilobus, while, in the Shennong Mountains, only for O. taihangensis was distributed.
Because O. longilobus grows on the cliffs of the Taihang Mountains, it is very difficult for our wild investigation. To better observe the growth and development of O. longiloous, we established a transplant garden (the O. longilobus individuals from the Xiangtang Mountains were transplanted to a garden) in Xiangtangshan National park of China (N36 36°20′–36°34′ N, 114°3′–114°16′ E) in 2016.
This park is located in Fengfeng Mining District, with an annual dryness of 1.4 degrees. Maximum wind speed in the calendar year is 14 m/s. Spring precipitation accounts for 12.7% of the region’s annual precipitation [53]. The environmental conditions of the park, such as annual average temperature, extreme maximum temperature, and annual average rainfall, are different with the Xiangtang Mountains, though both belong to the same climatic zone. From July to October of 2020, O. longilobus flowers were collected, including wild flowers and transplant flowers. Concurrently, O. taihangensis wild flowers were collected as comparative samples from the Shennong Mountains due to the phylogenetic relationship with O. longilobus [54] (Table A4).
For sampling, fresh and healthy whole flowers in the full bloom stage were collected and placed into Ziploc bags (one bag for each group). The samples were quickly fixed with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. All flower samples were processed as three groups: O. longilobus wild flowers (four samples), O. longilobus transplant flowers (three samples), and O. taihangensis wild flowers (five samples). We remarked the O. longilobus wild flowers to CLW, O. longilobus transplant flowers to CLT, and O. taihangensis wild flowers to TH. CL and TH came from the name of the Chinese phonetic transcriptions of O. longilobus and O. taihangensis, respectively. Wild was abbreviated as W, while transplant was T. For O. taihangensis, the only flowers from the wild were marked as TH.
Meanwhile, our study was conducted in accordance with the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and field collection was approved by the Chinese Government. All researchers received permission letters from the School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University. The voucher specimens were deposited in the herbarium of School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University (No: 20200105030–20200105042).

4.2. Total Metabolite of the Flowers

4.2.1. Extraction of Total Metabolite

Due to the robustness, high selectivity and sensitivity, and a strong potential for both quantification and identification purposes, the liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed in this study [55,56,57,58,59].
The collected samples were thawed on ice, 100 mg of tissue was weighed and grinded with liquid nitrogen, 120 µL of a precooled 50% methanol buffer was added, and the metabolites were extracted from 20 µL of each sample.
Subsequently, the metabolite mixture was vortexed for 1 min and incubated for 10 min at room temperature and stored at −20°C overnight. The mixture was then centrifuged at 4000× g for 20 min, and the supernatant was transferred to 96-well plates and stored at −80°C pending LC-MS analysis. Pooled quality control (QC) samples were also prepared by combining 10 μL of each extraction mixture.
All samples were analyzed using a TripleTOF 5600 Plus highresolution tandem mass spectrometer (SCIEX, Warrington, UK) with both positive and negative ion modes. Chromatographic separation was performed using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) system (SCIEX, UK). An ACQUITY UPLC T3 column (100 mm*2.1 mm, 1.8 µm, Waters, UK) was used for the reversed-phase separation. It was introduced for the separation of metabolites, and the mobile phase consisted of solvent A (water, 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (Acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). The gradient elution conditions were as follows: with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min: 5% solvent B for 0–0.5 min; 5–100% solvent B for 0.5–7 min; 100% solvent B for 7–8 min; 100–5% solvent B for 8–8.1 min; and 5% solvent B for 8.1–10 min. The column temperature was maintained at 35 °C.
The TripleTOF 5600 Plus system was used to detect metabolites eluted from the column. The curtain gas pressure was set at 30 PSI, the ion source gas1 and gas2 pressure was set at 60 PSI. The interface heater temperature was 650 °C. For the positive-ion mode, the ion spray floating voltage was set at 5 kV, and for the negative-ion mode, it was set at −4.5 kV. The MS data were acquired in the IDA mode. The TOF mass range was 60–1200 Da. Survey scans were acquired every 150 ms, and as many as 12 product ion scans were collected if the threshold of 100 counts/s was exceeded with a 1+ charge state. The total cycle time was fixed at 0.56 s. Four-time bins were summed for each scan at a pulse frequency of 11 kHz by monitoring the 40 GHz multichannel TDC detector with four-anode/channel detection. Dynamic exclusion was set for 4 s.

4.2.2. Determination of Differential Metabolites

The pretreatment of acquired LC-MS data was performed using XCMS software. Raw data files were converted to mzXML format and then processed using the XCMS, CAMERA, and metaX toolbox included in R software. The data was matched to in-house and public databases. The peak intensity data was further preprocessed using metaX, and metabolic substances with standard deviations of >30% were removed. The dataset groups were normalized prior to analysis using the probabilistic quotient normalization algorithm. The p value analyzed by Student’s t-test was adjusted for multiple tests using an FDR (Benjamini–Hochberg), and then used for the selection of various metabolites. In conjunction with multivariate statistical analysis, the VIP value obtained by PLS-DA was analyzed to screen differential metabolic ions. The different ions met the following requirements: (1) Ratio ≥ 2 or Ratio ≤ 1/2; (2) Q value ≤ 0.05; (3) VIP ≥ 1 for the screening of differential metabolites. Assessment of nutritional value and quantitative analysis of bioactive phytochemicals was performed through the targeted LC-MS/MS method.
For annotation of differential metabolites, the metabolomic database was annotated using KEGG to retrieve all the pathways mapped by the differential metabolites. The pathways of the differential metabolites were further screened to identify key pathways that had the highest correlations with the different metabolites. Fold-change analysis and the t-test statistical test were employed to conduct BH corrections to obtain the Q-value.

4.2.3. Venn Diagram among Differential Metabolites

Subsequently, enrichment analysis of differential metabolites among the CLW, CLT, and TH groups was also performed. In addition, those with different expressions were screened by Origin to develop a Venn diagram.

4.3. Aromatic Substances of the Flowers

4.3.1. Determination of Aromatic Substances

To evaluate the biochemical differences between O. longilobus and O. taihangensis flowers under various conditions, the metabolic scent profiles were compared. According to the original data, the differential metabolites of p < 0.05 and VIP > 1 were screened, and the similarity >700 was also screened. The non-volatile aromatic-related metabolites were then identified and classified, and a metabolic pathway map was illustrated using Visio software (Office Visio 2013, Microsoft USA, Redmond, WA, USA).

4.3.2. Variation Coefficient of Identified Aromatic Compounds

The variation coefficient (CV) is a statistic index used to quantify the degree of variation for each metabolite. For this study, the variation coefficient was calculated using the formula: CV = σ/μ, where σ is the standard deviation and μ is the average value. The variation coefficients of different metabolic aromatic compounds were subsequently plotted using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 26, Chicago, IL, USA) software.

4.3.3. PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and Heat Map of Different Aromatic Compounds

A PCA diagram of different aromatic metabolites was plotted using Origin (Origin 2018) software. The relative content maps of differential metabolites were plotted with SigmaPlot version 10.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) software. The metabolic pathway map was depicted using Visio software (Office Visio 2013, Microsoft USA).

4.3.4. Network Relationship among Different Aromatic Metabolites

To further explore the relationship among differential aromatic metabolites, the network analysis was displayed using Cytoscape 3.7.0 software.

4.4. Correlations between Floral Metabolites and Environment Factors

The required environmental factors were mainly obtained from the FAO (http://www.fao.org/home/zh/) (accessed on 10 May 2021) and Worldclim (https://worldclim.org/) (accessed on 10 May 2021) websites. Data on the climate of the Taihang Mountains (1970–2000) were mainly obtained from WorldClim 2.1 (www.worldclim.org) (accessed on 20 May 2021), and land data were obtained from FAO (www.fao.org) (accessed on 20 May 2021).
A total of 103 climatic factors were obtained according to their longitude and latitude using R software. According to the variance inflation factor (VIF) and PCA of Origin software, significant environmental factors were obtained.
Finally, Pearson correlations between significant environmental factors and different aromatic substances were then calculated and plotted using Origin (Origin 2018) software [60]. It was generally believed that there was a significant relationship when the p value was < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

Through LC-MS/MS methods, the expressions of metabolic compounds were shown to be significantly different between O. longilobus wild flowers (CLW), O. longilobus l transplant flowers (CLT), and O. taihangensis wild flowers (TH). Two types of phenylpropane metabolites, eugenol, and chlorogenic, were responsible for the differences in non-volatile aromatic components between O. longilobus and O. taihangensis. Following transplantation, O. longilobus exhibited a positive response toward adapting to biological and abiotic stresses via the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway compared with the wild O. longilobus flowers. Different aromatic substances were also observed between the two species, which indicated the differences in attracting pollinators, resisting diseases and pests, and adapting to habitats, which may be the reason that the descendant O. taihangensis could colonize the completely different environment compared with its ancestor O. longilobus. The results in this study revealed the potential response mechanisms of O. longilobus to different habitats, while providing a scientific basis for the synthesis and regulation of aromatic substances in O. longilobus and O. taihangensis.

Author Contributions

Methodology, W.H.; software, S.H.; validation, L.L.; formal analysis, X.F. and Q.Q.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L., Y.L. and H.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970358); the Research Project of the Shanxi Scholarship Council (2020-090); and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China (20210302124501).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the support and help from fellow apprentices in the lab in carrying out the related work in general. Thanks to them for their enthusiastic help in the experimental process and writing process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. KEGG metabolic pathway enrichment results of the differential metabolites of CLW/CLT, TH/CLW, and TH/CLT flowers.
Table A1. KEGG metabolic pathway enrichment results of the differential metabolites of CLW/CLT, TH/CLW, and TH/CLT flowers.
TH/CLTTH/CLWCLW/CLT
Pathwayp ValuePathwayp ValuePathwayp Value
1Aminoacyl–tRNA biosynthesis0.0000001Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis0.000001Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis0.000126
2Biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites0.0000018Aminoacyl–tRNA biosynthesis0.000002Flavonoid biosynthesis0.000146
3Purine metabolism0.0000134Purine metabolism0.000003Biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites0.000603
4Arginine biosynthesis0.0000260Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis0.000014Arginine biosynthesis0.000669
5Biosynthesis of amino acids0.0000294Biosynthesis of amino acids0.000051D-Arginine and D-ornithine metabolism0.002512
6Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism0.0000715Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism0.000096Monobactam biosynthesis0.003177
7Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis0.0000787Biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites0.000125Plant hormone signal transduction0.003649
8Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis0.0001179Arginine biosynthesis0.000566alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism0.003928
9ABC transporters0.0001642Glutathione metabolism0.003880Purine metabolism0.005093
10Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)–anchor biosynthesis0.0007732Nitrogen metabolism0.003933Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism0.005406
11Nitrogen metabolism0.0033012alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism0.005587Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis0.007179
12Monobactam biosynthesis0.0034142 Flavonoid biosynthesis0.005988 Glycerophospholipid metabolism0.007179
13Biosynthesis of plant hormones0.0045998 Biosynthesis of plant hormones0.005988 Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism0.008390
14Phenylalanine metabolism0.0058746 Arginine and proline metabolism0.009545 Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites0.008622
15Histidine metabolism0.0067199 Glycerophospholipid metabolism0.011879 Caffeine metabolism0.011118
16Arginine and proline metabolism0.0073812 Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis0.011902 Valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis0.013267
17Glycerophospholipid metabolism0.0096015 Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism0.014398 Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms0.013267
18D-Arginine and D-ornithine metabolism0.0107750 Sulfur relay system0.014663 Biosynthesis of plant hormones0.014980
19Sulfur relay system0.0130323 Carbapenem biosynthesis0.017159 ABC transporters0.015198
20beta-Alanine metabolism0.0145440 beta-Alanine metabolism0.017159 Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis0.015581
21Plant hormone signal transduction0.0154762 Plant hormone signal transduction0.017401 Ether lipid metabolism0.015581
22Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites0.0155926 Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites0.019561 Biosynthesis of amino acids0.015608
23Cysteine and methionine metabolism0.0175387 ABC transporters0.020756 Phenylalanine metabolism0.017460
24Isoflavonoid biosynthesis0.0185040 Cysteine and methionine metabolism0.021527 Cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis0.018056
25Lysine biosynthesis0.0185420 Lysine biosynthesis0.021826 Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism0.019352
26Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis0.0185420 Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis0.021826 Linoleic acid metabolism0.019352
27Glutathione metabolism0.0230920 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism0.027176 Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis0.019352
28Flavonoid biosynthesis0.0238246 Monobactam biosynthesis0.029026 Pyruvate metabolism0.023468
29alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism0.0300204 Zeatin biosynthesis0.029026 beta-Alanine metabolism0.024913
30Cyanoamino acid metabolism0.0358597 Phenylalanine metabolism0.034937 Lysine biosynthesis0.029461
31Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism0.0400552 Cyanoamino acid metabolism0.041900 Cyanoamino acid metabolism0.046743
32Caffeine metabolism0.0448472 Histidine metabolism0.046734 Histidine metabolism0.050557
33Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism0.0467952 Caffeine metabolism0.050120 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis0.054482
34Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism0.0488251 Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism0.054479 Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism0.056484
35Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms0.0529265 Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism0.054530 Fatty acid biosynthesis0.056484
36Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism0.0591885 Valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis0.059071 Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids0.064746
37Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis0.0614800 Carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms0.059071 Pentose and glucuronate interconversions0.066873
38Ether lipid metabolism0.0614800 Stilbenoid, diarylheptanoid, and gingerol biosynthesis0.068528 Cysteine and methionine metabolism0.082391
392-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism0.0653205 Ether lipid metabolism0.068528 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism0.083403
40Linoleic acid metabolism0.0751166 Linoleic acid metabolism0.083564 Isoflavonoid biosynthesis0.084693
41Biotin metabolism0.0751166 Biotin metabolism0.083564 Anthocyanin biosynthesis0.091717
42Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis0.0751166 Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism0.087651 Arginine and proline metabolism0.116284
43Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism0.0758846 Isoflavonoid biosynthesis0.094429 Sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis0.147696
44Metabolic pathways0.0936330Pyruvate metabolism0.099500 Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism0.203258
45Carbapenem biosynthesis0.0946195C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolism0.104990 Carbon metabolism0.214688
46C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolism0.0946195Tyrosine metabolism0.151417 Metabolic pathways0.426795
47Glycerolipid metabolism0.1100949Butanoate metabolism0.157551 beta-Alanine metabolism0.150846
48Zeatin biosynthesis0.1316694Galactose metabolism0.182275
49Tyrosine metabolism0.1326520Lysine degradation0.226724
50Butanoate metabolism0.1427985Carbon metabolism0.305920
51Lysine degradation0.2068783Anthocyanin biosynthesis0.317058
52Fructose and mannose metabolism0.2188817Tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis0.329871
53Pentose and glucuronate interconversions0.2249079Pyrimidine metabolism0.329871
54Carbon metabolism0.2740372Metabolic pathways0.360415
55Tropane, piperidine, and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis0.3038096Glucosinolate biosynthesis0.374164
56Pyrimidine metabolism0.3038096Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism0.410889
57Glucosinolate biosynthesis0.3459471Sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis0.453081
58Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism0.3729929Ubiquinone and other terpenoid–quinone biosynthesis0.464742
59Ubiquinone and other terpenoid–quinone biosynthesis0.4331321Diterpenoid biosynthesis0.536900
60Diterpenoid biosynthesis0.5036407
61Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism0.5292665
Table A2. Coefficient of variation (CV) for CLT, CLW, and TH.
Table A2. Coefficient of variation (CV) for CLT, CLW, and TH.
SubstanceCLT-CVCLW-CV TH-CV
Chlorogenate4.36 2.59 8.80
Caffeate3.97 3.03 4.60
Carvacrol11.79 20.25 6.01
Thymol7.58 6.66 3.03
Eugenol6.54 5.70 4.05
Cinnamaldehyd4.25 24.60 6.88
Scopoletin3.61 8.01 4.96
Coniferyl aldehyde11.83 55.25 6.88
Trans-2-Hydroxycinnamate48.72 29.11 8.26
4-Hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde3.16 23.66 29.63
4-Hydroxystyrene8.34 34.21 2.17
Quercetin47.03 33.96 20.87
Vitexin17.04 6.76 9.71
Luteolin 1.46 53.42 31.48
Chrysoeriol5.49 4.31 14.87
Rutin10.91 7.93 5.42
Syringetin4.28 4.80 10.89
Taxifolin7.36 9.03 10.61
Delphinidin13.97 10.22 38.06
Naringenin chalcone3.00 6.24 36.66
Dioctyl phthalate21.35 39.00 38.26
Phenol35.77 44.32 10.05
p-Cresol18.11 5.94 33.29
3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde6.76 9.14 27.61
Phenyl acetate7.71 6.63 10.97
3-Nitrophenol1.65 9.08 10.75
trans-2-Hydroxycinnamic acid8.11 4.38 14.84
Hesperetin3.78 7.47 11.98
Rrange0.1–48.720.58–55.252.17–38.06
Table A3. Major environmental factors of sample sites.
Table A3. Major environmental factors of sample sites.
Environmental FactorsPCAVIF
The coldest month minimum temperature0.23253-
Lowest temperature January0.23253-
Lowest temperature December0.230591.502
Average temperature December0.21505-
Water vapor pressure Feb0.20949-
Lowest temperature November0.19197-
Water vapor pressure April0.18347-
Average precipitation November0.18101-
Average temperature January0.17675-
Lowest temperature February0.16969-
Driest quarterly average temperature0.1695-
Coldest quarterly average temperature0.1695-
Water vapor pressure March0.16804-
Lowest temperature October0.157011.460
Table A4. CLT, CLW, and TH samples and location information.
Table A4. CLT, CLW, and TH samples and location information.
SpeciesSampleLocationBatchClass
Opisthopappus longilobusCLW1Xiangtang Moutains, Hebei 1CLW
CLW2Xiangtang Moutains, Hebei 1CLW
CLW3Xiangtang Moutains, Hebei 1CLW
CLW4Xiangtang Moutains, Hebei 1CLW
CLT1Xiangtangshan National Park, Hebei 1CLT
CLT2Xiangtangshan National Park, Hebei 1CLT
CLT3Xiangtangshan National Park, Hebei 1CLT
Opisthopappus taihangensisTH1Shennong Moutains, Henan 1TH
TH2Shennong Moutains, Henan 1TH
TH3Shennong Moutains, Henan 1TH
TH4Shennong Moutains, Henan 1TH
TH5Shennong Moutains, Henan 1TH
Figure A1. PCA of significant aromatic substances of CLT, CLW, TH groups. Note: The arrows indicate the feature vectors of the aromatic metabolites. The projection of the arrows to the coordinate axis represents the contribution of the original feature to each principal component in the new space. The longer the projection, the greater the contribution of this metabolite to this principal component. Based on the feature vectors of metabolites, it can be clearly seen that the samples from different groups were far apart from each other, while samples from the same group were gathered together. In addition, the black, red, and green dots represent samples from the CLT, CLW, and TH groups, respectively.
Figure A1. PCA of significant aromatic substances of CLT, CLW, TH groups. Note: The arrows indicate the feature vectors of the aromatic metabolites. The projection of the arrows to the coordinate axis represents the contribution of the original feature to each principal component in the new space. The longer the projection, the greater the contribution of this metabolite to this principal component. Based on the feature vectors of metabolites, it can be clearly seen that the samples from different groups were far apart from each other, while samples from the same group were gathered together. In addition, the black, red, and green dots represent samples from the CLT, CLW, and TH groups, respectively.
Plants 12 01592 g0a1

References

  1. Webb, C. Engineering Fundamentals of Biotechnology; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Apura, P.; Gonçalves, L.G.; Viegas, S.C.; Arraiano, C.M. The world of ribonucleases from pseudomonads: A short trip through the main features and singularities. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 14, 2316–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Q.; Jin, Q.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Iron toxicity-induced regulation of key secondary metabolic processes associated with the quality and resistance of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 224, 112648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krasensky, J.; Jonak, C. Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Deng, M.; Zhang, X.; Luo, J.; Liu, H.; Wen, W.; Luo, H.; Yan, J.; Xiao, Y. Metabolomics analysis reveals differences in evolution between maize and rice. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1710–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Isah, T. Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production. Biol. Res. 2019, 52, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Groves, N.R.; Biel, A.M.; Newman-Griffis, A.H.; Meier, I. Dynamic Changes in Plant Nuclear Organization in Response to Environmental and Developmental Signals. Plant Physiol. 2017, 176, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Erb, M.; Kliebenstein, D.J. Plant secondary metabolites as defenses, regulators and primary metabolites—The blurred functional trichotomy. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hayat, S.; Hayat, Q.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wani, A.S.; Pichtel, J.; Ahmad, A. Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 1456–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, Y.; Kong, D.; Fu, Y.; Sussman, M.R.; Wu, H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brett, J.R. Environmental factors and growth. Fish Physiol. 1979, 8, 599–675. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mondal, A.K.; Parui, S.; Mandal, S. Analysis of the free amino acid content in pollen of nine Asteraceae species of known allergenic activity. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. Aaem 1998, 5, 17. [Google Scholar]
  13. Joshi, J.; Hasnain, G.; Logue, T.; Lynch, M.; Wu, S.; Guan, J.C.; Alseekh, S.; Fernie, A.R.; Hanson, A.D.; McCarty, D.R. A Core Metabolome Response of Maize Leaves Subjected to Long-Duration Abiotic Stresses. Metabolites 2021, 11, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Katz, E.; Li, J.J.; Jaegle, B.; Ashkenazy, H.; Abrahams, S.R.; Bagaza, C.; Holden, S.; Pires, C.J.; Angelovici, R.; Kliebenstein, D.J. Genetic variation, environment and demography intersect to shape Arabidopsis defense metabolite variation across Europe. Elife Sci. 2021, 10, e67784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hou, J.L.; Li, W.D.; Zheng, Q.Y.; Wang, W.Q.; Xiao, B.; Xing, D. Effect of low light intensity on growth and accumulation of secondary metabolites in roots of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, S.; Zeng, X.; Wu, H.; Shen, S.; Yang, X.; Deng, W.; Ning, J. Characterizing Volatile Metabolites in Raw Pu’er Tea Stored in Wet-Hot or Dry-Cold Environments by Performing Metabolomic Analysis and using the Molecular Sensory Science Approach. Food Chem. 2021, 350, 129186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paré, P.; Tumlinson, J.H. Induced synthesis of plant volatiles. Nature 1997, 385, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sudha, G.; Ravishankar, G.A. Involvement and interaction of various signaling compounds on the plant metabolic events during defense response, resistance to stress factors, formation of secondary metabolites and their molecular aspects. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 71, 181–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ogbe, A.A.; Finnie, J.F.; Staden, J.V. The role of endophytes in secondary metabolites accumulation in medicinal plants under abiotic stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 134, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sampaio, B.L.; Edrada-Ebel, R.A.; Costa, F. Effect of the environment on the secondary metabolic profile of Tithonia diversifolia: A model for environmental metabolomics of plants. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ding, W.; Cong, W.-F.; Lambers, H. Plant phosphorus-acquisition and -use strategies affect soil carbon cycling. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2021, 36, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Yan, G. Genetic diversity and population structure of Opisthopappus longilobus and Opisthopappus taihangensis (Asteraceae) in China determined using sequence related amplified polymorphism markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 49, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Teng, N.; Chen, F.; Chen, S.; Sun, C.; Fan, W. Reproductive characteristics of Opisthopappus taihangensis (Ling) Shih, an endangered Asteraceae species endemic to China. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 121, 474–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu, S. Opisthopappus Shih—A new genus of Compositae from China. Chih Wu Fen Lei Hsueh Pao. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 1979, 3, 110–112. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, H.F.; Wei, D.W.; Liu, J.Q.; Sun, W.Y.; Ye, Y.Z. Determination of Chlorogenic acid and Four flavonoids in Different Organs of Opisthopappus taihangensis (Ling)Shih. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2013, 25, 646–651. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wei, D.; Xu, M.; Sun, W.; Jia, C.; Zhang, X. Antioxidant activity of aqueous extracts from different organs of Opisthopappus Shih. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 15, 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ye, H.; Wang, Z.; Hou, H.; Wu, J.; Gao, Y.; Han, W.; Ru, W.; Sun, G.; Wang, Y. Localized environmental heterogeneity drives the population differentiation of two endangered and endemic Opisthopappus Shih species. BMC Ecol. Evol. 2021, 21, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chai, M.; Ye, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, J.; Gao, Y.; Han, W.; Zang, E.; Zhang, H.; Ru, W.; et al. Genetic Divergence and Relationship Among Opisthopappus Species Identified by Development of EST-SSR Markers. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zaynab, M.; Fatima, M.; Sharif, Y.; Zafar, M.H.; Ali, H.; Khan, K.A. Role of primary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 137, 103728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fang, C.; Fernie, A.R.; Luo, J. Exploring the Diversity of Plant Metabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 24, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, T.; Liu, Q.; Wang, N.; Dai, J.; Lu, Q.; Jia, X.; Lin, L.; Yu, F.; Zuo, Y. Foliar arginine application improves tomato plant growth, yield, and fruit quality via nitrogen accumulation. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 95, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kamel, A.M.; El-Gengaihi, S.E. Secondary and Primary Plant Metabolites as Chemical Markers for Resistance of Bitter Candytuft (Iberis amara) Plant against Insect Attack. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2008, 36, 80–87. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bonaventure, G. Perception of insect feeding by plants. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Larue, A.A.C.; Raguso, R.A.; Junker, R.R. Experimental manipulation of floral scent bouquets restructures flower-visitor interactions in the field. J. Anim. Ecol. 2016, 85, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Biere, A.; Marak, H.B.; Damme, J. Plant chemical defense against herbivores and pathogens: Generalized defense or trade-offs? Oecologia 2004, 140, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wright, G.A.; Schiestl, F.P. The evolution of floral scent: The influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewards. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dixon, R.A.; Achnine, L.; Kota, P.; Liu, C.J.; Reddy, M.S.; Wang, L.J. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—A genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Padilla-González, G.F.; Frey, M.; Gómez-Zeledón, J.; Da Costa, F.B.; Spring, O. Metabolomic and gene expression approaches reveal the developmental and environmental regulation of the secondary metabolism of yacón (Smallanthus sonchifolius, Asteraceae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Dong, N.Q.; Lin, H.X. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant–environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lanot, A.; Hodge, D.; Lim, E.K.; Vaistij, F.E.; Bowles, D.J. Redirection of flux through the phenylpropanoid pathway by increased glucosylation of soluble intermediates. Planta 2008, 228, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Garibay-Hernández, A.; Kessler, N.; Józefowicz, A.M.; Türksoy, G.M.; Lohwasser, U.; Mock, H.P. Untargeted metabotyping to study phenylpropanoid diversity in crop plants. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 680–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mostafa, S.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Jin, B. Floral Scents and Fruit Aromas: Functions, Compositions, Biosynthesis, and Regulation. Front. Plant. Sci. 2022, 13, 860157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Watanabe, B.; Kirikae, H.; Koeduka, T.; Takeuchi, Y.; Asai, T.; Naito, Y.; Tokuoka, H.; Horoiwa, S.; Nakagawa, Y.; Shimizu, B.I.; et al. Synthesis and inhibitory activity of mechanism-based 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 2466–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, D.; Liu, W.; Zhu, D.; Geng, M.; Zhou, W.; Yang, T. Nitrogen effects on total flavonoids, chlorogenic acid, and antioxidant activity of the medicinal plant Chrysanthemum morifolium. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ulanowska, M.; Olas, B. Biological Properties and Prospects for the Application of Eugenol—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, S.A.; Rhee, M.S. Highly enhanced bactericidal effects of medium chain fatty acids (caprylic, capric, and lauric acid) combined with edible plant essential oils (carvacrol, eugenol, β-resorcylic acid, trans -cinnamaldehyde, thymol, and vanillin) against Escherichia coli O157: H7. Food Control 2016, 60, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  47. Marone, D.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Borreli, G.M.; Mores, A.; Laidò, G.; Russo, M.R.; Ficco, M.D. Specialized metabolites: Physiological and biochemical role in stress resistance, strategies to improve their accumulation, and new applications in crop breeding and management. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 172, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sagae, M.; Oyama-Okubo, N.; Ando, T.; Marchesi, E.; Nakayama, M. Effect of Temperature on the Floral Scent Emission and Endogenous Volatile Profile of Petunia axillaris. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, S.; Fu, X.; Mei, X.; Zhou, Y.; Du, B.; Watanabe, N.; Yang, Z. Regulation of biosynthesis and emission of volatile phenylpropanoids/benzenoids in petunia× hybrida flowers by multi-factors of circadian clock, light, and temperature. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Leng, P.; Zhao, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, S. The emission of floral scent from Lilium ‘siberia’ in response to light intensity and temperature. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Leyva, A.; Jarillo, J.A.; Salinas, J.; Martinez-Zapater, J.M. Low Temperature Induces the Accumulation of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase and Chalcone Synthase mRNAs of Arabidopsis thaliana in a Light-Dependent Manner. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, W.Q. Monitoring of Vegetation Change in Mining Area Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study of Fengfeng Mining Area. Bachelor’s Thesis, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Zang, E.; Qie, Q.; He, S.; Hao, W.; Lan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Sun, G.; Wang, Y. Geographic distribution pattern and ecological niche differentiation of endangered Opisthopappusin Taihang Mountains. Braz. J. Bot. 2023, 46, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, C.; Ryu, H.D.; Chung, E.G.; Kim, Y. Determination of 18 veterinary antibiotics in environmental water using high-performance liquid chromatography-q-orbitrap combined with on-line solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1084, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.; Lin, L.; Li, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Guo, S.; Nkinahamira, F.; Yu, C.P.; Sun, Q. Determination of 38 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water by lyophilization combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hoi, B.V.; Vu, C.T.; Phung-Thi, L.A.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, P.T.; Mai, H.; Le, P.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Duong, D.T.; Thi, H.N.; et al. Determination of Pharmaceutical Residues by UPLC-MS/MS Method: Validation and Application on Surface Water and Hospital Wastewater. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2021, 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  58. Cha, J.M.; Yang, S.; Carlson, K.H. Trace determination of beta-lactam antibiotics in surface water and urban wastewater using liquid chromatography combined with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1115, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hernandez, F.; Bakker, J.; Bijlsma, L.; de Boer, J.; Botero-Coy, A.M.; de Bruin, Y.B.; Fischer, S.; Hollender, J.; Kasprzyk-Hordern, B.; Lamoree, M.; et al. The role of analytical chemistry in exposure science: Focus on the aquatic environment. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 564–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mahtani-Williams, S.; Fulton, W.; Desvars-Larrive, A.; Lado, S.; Elbers, J.P.; Halpern, B.; Herczeg, D.; Babocsay, G.; Lauš, B.; Nagy, Z.T.; et al. Landscape Genomics of a Widely Distributed Snake, Dolichophis caspius (Gmelin, 1789) across Eastern Europe and Western Asia. Genes 2020, 11, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Venn diagrams for flowers metabolites. A. red for CLW; B. blue for CLT; C. yellow for TH. AB. common substances to CLW and CLT; AC. common substances to CLW and TH; BC. common substances to CLT and TH; ABC. common to CLW, CLT, TH groups. Note: CL, O. longilobus; CLW, O. longilobus wild flowers; CLT, O. longilobus transplant flowers; TH, O. taihangensis wild flowers.
Figure 1. Venn diagrams for flowers metabolites. A. red for CLW; B. blue for CLT; C. yellow for TH. AB. common substances to CLW and CLT; AC. common substances to CLW and TH; BC. common substances to CLT and TH; ABC. common to CLW, CLT, TH groups. Note: CL, O. longilobus; CLW, O. longilobus wild flowers; CLT, O. longilobus transplant flowers; TH, O. taihangensis wild flowers.
Plants 12 01592 g001
Figure 2. CLT, CLW, and TH group aroma substances expression heatmap. The top right corner is the highest to lowest expression, and red is the highest expression color. Note: The abbreviation of CLT, CLW, and TH was same with Figure 1.
Figure 2. CLT, CLW, and TH group aroma substances expression heatmap. The top right corner is the highest to lowest expression, and red is the highest expression color. Note: The abbreviation of CLT, CLW, and TH was same with Figure 1.
Plants 12 01592 g002
Figure 3. Metabolite network relationship of aromatic substances. Each node represents a metabolite.
Figure 3. Metabolite network relationship of aromatic substances. Each node represents a metabolite.
Plants 12 01592 g003
Figure 4. Chlorogenic and eugenol synthetic related pathway in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway.
Figure 4. Chlorogenic and eugenol synthetic related pathway in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway.
Plants 12 01592 g004
Table 1. Aromatic compound expression (relative units) in CLT, CLW, and TH.
Table 1. Aromatic compound expression (relative units) in CLT, CLW, and TH.
SubstanceCLTCLWTHPathway
Chlorogenate105,479.21 19,921.39 274,799.37 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Caffeate10,786.84 26,437.30 169,303.97 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Carvacrol45,265.46 5310.48 13,994.04 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Thymol92,435.68 16,687.11 40,157.56 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Eugenol450,751.5511,388.273814.11Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Cinnamaldehyde12,952.79 5892.94 4449.50 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Scopoletin59,001.51 10,522.40 132,320.74 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Coniferyl aldehyde2351.69 2560.67 4449.50 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Trans-2-HyDdroxycinnamate1242.84 1394.90 16,694.42 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
4-Hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde3320.20 1792.73 7750.14 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
4-Hydroxystyrene9294.67 7470.99 2751.54 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Quercetin2609.50 3928.13 9140.53 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Vitexin2274.42 9813.69 3345.64 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Luteolin 7-O-beta-D-glucoside6273.09 7178.23 16,711.09 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Chrysoeriol78,813.62 120,830.08 21,661.31 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Rutin4227.24 5222.34 20,086.61 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Syringetin45,869.14 12,767.33 41,409.86 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Taxifolin15,370.62 6753.96 8319.35 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Delphinidin2436.45 18,204.98 4483.08 arginine biosynthesis
Naringenin chalcone8136.07 16,785.24 10,369.81 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Dioctyl phthalate123,258.45 39,622.58 47,210.77 Chemical carcinogenesis—Receptor activation
Phenol3296.28 3956.37 2215.23 Bisphenol degradation
p-Cresol1951.54 514.12 327.25 Toluene degradation
3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde8049.15 7936.81 1037.18 Toluene degradation
Phenyl acetate166,712.44 148,542.13 13,535.54 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
3-Nitrophenol8723.93 14,561.86 5941.29 Aminobenzoate degradation
Trans-2-Hydroxycinnamic acid25,270.25 4991.71 1565.01 Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
Hesperetin88,158.46 56,960.99 39,691.62 Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis
Note: the abbreviation of CLT, CLW, and TH was same Figure 1.
Table 2. Correlations between aromatic substances and two environmental factors.
Table 2. Correlations between aromatic substances and two environmental factors.
Lowest Temperature in OctoberLowest Temperature in OctoberLowest Temperature in DecemberLowest Temperature in December
Pearson correlationp-valuePearson correlationp-value
Chlorogenate−0.26010.414240.72105 *0.00814
Caffeate−0.549040.064490.476130.11764
Carvacrol0.93519 *8.07 × 10−60.73249 *0.00674
thymol0.88483 *1.31 × 10−40.82039 *0.00108
eugenol0.88483 *1.31 × 10−40.82039 *0.00108
cinnamaldehyd0.95583 *1.23 × 10−60.30870.32893
Scopoletin−0.213180.505890.75863 *0.00423
Coniferyl aldehyde−0.440130.152180.380820.22198
trans-2-Hydroxycinnamate−0.492410.103890.528380.0774
4-Hydroxycinnamyl aldehyde−0.283090.372610.60134 *0.03861
4-Hydroxystyrene0.60689 *0.03639−0.304180.33643
Quercetin−0.551990.062780.358710.2522
Vitexin−0.378710.22477−0.987112.75 × 10−9
Luteolin 7-O-beta-D-glucoside−0.425530.167850.38042 *0.22251
Chrysoeriol0.192790.54829−0.77187 *0.00327
Rutin−0.52530.079460.498150.0993
Syringetin0.367390.240070.97295 *1.09 × 10−7
Taxifolin0.9309 *1.10 × 10−50.68244 *0.01447
Delphinidin−0.363090.24603−0.9719 *1.32 × 10−7
Naringenin chalcone−0.391080.20873−0.80275 *0.00167
Dioctyl phthalate0.86946 *2.39 × 10−40.536050.07241
Phenol0.146310.65002−0.480330.11398
p-Cresol0.97346 *9.92 × 10−80.376820.22728
3-Hydroxybenzaldehyde0.495740.10121−0.524550.07997
Phenyl acetate0.560860.05782−0.461920.13059
3-Nitrophenol−0.01520.9626−0.87167 *2.20 × 10−4
trans-2-Hydroxycinnamic acid0.98848 *1.57 × 10−90.348750.26656
Hesperetin0.89367 *8.93 × 10−50.074830.81721
Note: * indicated a significant relationship occurred.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Z.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hao, W.; He, S.; Liu, L.; Feng, X.; Qie, Q.; Chai, M.; Wang, Y. Responses of Aroma Related Metabolic Attributes of Opisthopappus longilobus Flowers to Environmental Changes. Plants 2023, 12, 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081592

AMA Style

Liu Z, Lan Y, Zhang H, Hao W, He S, Liu L, Feng X, Qie Q, Chai M, Wang Y. Responses of Aroma Related Metabolic Attributes of Opisthopappus longilobus Flowers to Environmental Changes. Plants. 2023; 12(8):1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Zhixia, Yafei Lan, Hao Zhang, Weili Hao, Shan He, Li Liu, Xiaolong Feng, Qiyang Qie, Min Chai, and Yiling Wang. 2023. "Responses of Aroma Related Metabolic Attributes of Opisthopappus longilobus Flowers to Environmental Changes" Plants 12, no. 8: 1592. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop