Next Article in Journal
Root Zone Water Management Effects on Soil Hydrothermal Properties and Sweet Potato Yield
Previous Article in Journal
Lineages of Fractal Genera Comprise the 88-Million-Year Steel Evolutionary Spine of the Ecosphere
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome Size in the Arenaria ciliata Species Complex (Caryophyllaceae), with Special Focus on Northern Europe and the Arctic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Understanding Arctic–Alpine Plants from Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives

by
Gregor Kozlowski
1,2,3
1
Department of Biology and Botanical Garden, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
2
Natural History Museum Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 6, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
3
Eastern China Conservation Centre for Wild Endangered Plant Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, 3888 Chenhua Road, Songjiang, Shanghai 202602, China
Plants 2024, 13(11), 1560; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111560
Submission received: 22 May 2024 / Accepted: 3 June 2024 / Published: 5 June 2024
Conditions in arctic and alpine ecosystems impose great challenges on the plants and other organisms that live there [1]. Despite this, thousands of plant species worldwide survive or even prosper under extreme climatic, edaphic, and ecological conditions in the High North (or South) and in the high mountains [2]. Arctic and alpine plants continue to surprise researchers with their ingenious strategies and adaptations [3]. Today, global warming, the ever-increasing demand for resources, and the expansion of tourism are growing threats to arctic and alpine plant life, even in the most remote regions of the world. This applies not only to glacial relics and endemics in isolated mountain refugia but also to tundra areas that were intact until recently and are now under increasing pressure from man-made global changes [4,5]. In such a context, this Special Issue of Plants, entitled Arctic and Alpine Plants: Ecology, Adaptations and Conservation Biology, has been launched to improve our understanding of this unique group of plants from ecological, biogeographical, and evolutionary perspectives.
A publication by Körner [6] provides an excellent opportunity to investigate the complexity and specificity of high mountain plants and their communities, which are often found at the edge of their fundamental niches. This review paper presents no less than 12 concepts in alpine plant ecology, starting with life forms and aspects of the physical environment, such as topography, moving through physiology and reproductive biology, and finishing with global change drivers and their influence on plants growing in the alpine ecological zone. Despite the enormous complexity of such factors, Körner [6] states in his concluding comments that “nothing make sense in alpine plant biology unless one accounts for micro-climate”. This is further developed upon in concept 11 of his review, entitled “To be or not to be—the edge of the fundamental niche”. The author postulates that any projections of future species distributions, especially in the alpine and arctic context, need to rest on a very fine-grained representation of the landscape and stresses the essential role of microtopography in any modeling study.
The second review paper, by Hörandl [7], presents so-called geographical parthenogenesis and explores its importance for alpine and arctic plants. Geographical parthenogenesis describes the phenomenon of asexual organisms usually having larger distribution areas than their sexually reproducing relatives and colonizing more frequently at higher latitudes and in previously glaciated or otherwise devastated areas. However, the causal factors behind this phenomenon are still unclear. Polyploidy, epigenetic flexibility, and phenotypic plasticity are often seen as important factors fostering geographical parthenogenesis patterns. Additional large-scale studies are needed that include information on reproduction and that integrate ecological, experimental, and molecular research involving many genera and large-scale screening from large geographical areas. High arctic regions are of great importance since they are not easily accessible and, thus, are not well explored.
Polyploidy is an important phenomenon in understanding the biogeography and taxonomy of disjunct arctic–alpine species complexes. Wagner et al. [8] provided detailed insights into taxonomically challenging hexaploid alpine shrub willows (Salix sp., Salicaceae). In this study, RAD sequencing data, infrared spectroscopy, and morphometric data were used to analyze the phylogenetic relationships of the species from the Phylicifoliae and Nigricantes sections in a framework of 45 Eurasian Salix species. The results reveal, among other insights, that both sections are polyphyletic and need to be redefined. Additionally, S. bicolor should be included in S. phyllicifolia s.l., and the alpine endemic S. hegetschweileri is a distinct lineage showing close relationships to the Nigricantes clade.
The importance of large-scale geographical sampling when studying disjunct and polyploid arctic–alpine plant complexes was confirmed by two studies performed by Kozlowski et al. [9,10]. These two studies explored the genome sizes and ploidy levels of the Arenaria ciliata species complex (Caryophyllaceae). Their papers enabled the first synthesis of the ploidy level variability within this group, concluding that three taxa are predominantly tetraploid (2n = 4x = 40): the arctic A. pseudofrigida and the two alpine taxa A. multicaulis and A. ciliata subsp. ciliata. Higher ploidy levels were detected in A. norvegica (2n = 8x = 80) and A. gothica (2n = 10x = 100), and the highest detected ploidy level was for the narrow endemic of the Western Alps A. ciliata subsp. bernensis (2n = 20x = 200). These results confirm that there are no diploid taxa within the A. ciliata species complex and that this group is an example of a so-called mature polyploid complex, a common phenomenon among arctic–alpine taxa. The A. ciliata species group is, thus, an example of an arctic–alpine species complex characterized by reticulate evolution, polyploidization, and hybridization, most likely associated with rapid latitudinal and altitudinal migration from the Pleistocene through to the Holocene.
Due to their adaptations to cold environments, arctic and alpine plants are very sensitive to climate change. Two papers published in this Special Issue explore the influence of changing climate conditions on the past and future distributions of plants growing at high latitudes and altitudes. Both studies use traditional species distribution models (SDMs) based on data extracted from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and, thus, do not use fine-grained representations of the landscape, as proposed by Körner [6]. Walas et al. [11] assessed and compared the current and future potential niche areas of Kalmia procumbens (Ericaceae) in the Pyrenees and Carpathians. Both mountain ranges represent the southernmost localities of this circumpolar, arctic–alpine species in Europe. The results demonstrated, as expected, that the species covered a larger distribution area during the Last Glacial Maximum; due to recent, accelerated climate warming, a reduction in the potential distribution area is expected by 2100. However, the reduction will be substantial in the Carpathians, where only a few South Carpathian populations would persist, and would be rather moderate in the Pyrenees.
Zhang and Wang [12] presented another study using SDMs, aiming to predict the potential distribution of endangered Meconopsis punicea (Papaveraceae), which is endemic to China and grows in high-altitude grasslands and shrublands between 2800 and 4300 m a.s.l. Four types of species distribution models were applied: generalized linear model (GLM), generalized boosted model (GBM), random forests (RF) and flexible discriminants analysis (FDA). Under future climate change, the potential distribution of M. punicea will expand from southeastern to northwestern China. However, there were significant differences in the distributions predicted by the different SDMs. Therefore, the authors propose the use of consistent results from different SDMs as the basis for developing conservation strategies.
In addition to the frequently covered effects of climate warming, many other human-made changes have important impacts on the survival of arctic and alpine plants. Chardon et al. [13] explored the response of arctic shrubs and graminoids to human trampling, an integral component of global change; however, a comprehensive understanding of the effects of trampling on alpine and arctic ecosystems is lacking. The authors surveyed trail-side (disturbed) and off-trail (undisturbed) transects along altitudinal gradients in the Garibaldi Provincial Park in Canada. The main focus was placed on dominant shrubs (Phyllodoce empetriformis, Cassiope mertensiana, and Vaccinium ovalifolium, all three of which are Ericaceae) and on graminoids (Carex species, Cyperaceae). The study demonstrated that trampling reduces plant cover in all species and that growth traits are more sensitive than reproductive traits. However, the disturbance response is species-specific. For example, a reduction in size was observed only for P. empetriformis and V. ovalifolium, whereas in C. mertensiana, human trampling mainly reduced reproductive output. Interestingly, in Carex spp., height, but not diameter, was sensitive to trampling, indicating the need to measure the traits of multiple species to better understand the effects of disturbance on arctic and alpine plants. The results of this study are of great conservation importance, highlighting that specific management approaches may need to be tailored toward the protection of particular species.
Another aspect linked to land-use changes and climate warming is the spread of shrubs in arctic and alpine environments. Oberhuber et al. [14] focused on the most rapidly expanding shrub species in the European Alps, the green alder (Alnus alnobetula, Betulaceae). This study, using dendrochronological methods, was carried out in alder populations spread above 2100 m a.s.l. within the alpine treeline ecotone on Mt. Patscherkofer (Tyrol, Austria). The main problem in such high-altitude individuals is their asymmetric radial growth and anomalous growth ring patterns, which make representative measurements very challenging. Consequently, it is very difficult to differentiate between the influences of climate and microsite conditions on radial growth. In topographically heterogeneous environments, site-specific variability in the climate–growth relationships of A. alnobetula must be considered. Therefore, the authors provide the following sampling recommendations when undertaking investigations on site-specific variability: measuring one radius per shoot, three shoots per individual, and a minimum of ten individuals within the same stand, which results in ca. ten radii per study plot. However, for the determination of absolute growth rates and growth trends with respect to recent climate warming, the following recommendations are made: measuring 4 radii per shoot, ≥5 shoots per individual, and ≥10 individuals within one stand (total ca. 200 radii per study plot).
Another important phenomenon in alpine ecosystems is the decrease in the diversity of life forms with altitude. López et al. [15] investigated the changes of trees to shrubs and other life forms along an elevational gradient. The authors used Polylepis tarapacana (Rosaceae), a small, cold-tolerant, evergreen tree species growing in the Andes in the high-elevation Altiplano as a model taxon. After Tibet, the Altiplano Plateau, which lies between Bolivia, Peru, and Chile, is the second most extensive high plateau on Earth. In northwestern Argentina, where the study was carried out, P. tarapacana forms monospecific stands in a treeline ecotone. The authors propose a new classification of life forms for this species: arborescent, shrub, dwarf shrub, and brousse tigrée (tiger bush). The justification for this new classification lies not only in the marked biometric characteristics but also in the different influences of topographic, climatic, and human-use factors on their frequency. Therefore, it is important to consider these different life forms of P. tarapacana when conducting studies and developing management plans, since each life form occupies a particular environmental situation. The authors concluded that the conservation of P. tarapacana forests without differentiating between their life forms is achieved through the loss of part of their ecological niche.
In summarizing the subject matter presented in this Special Issue of Plants, entitled Arctic and Alpine Plants: Ecology, Adaptations and Conservation Biology, it is evident that, despite the long tradition of alpine and arctic research, there is still much to be discovered. The future of these highly specialized organisms is uncertain. All the authors of this Special Issue agree that much more intensive field work and field research should be carried out, as well as more experimental work. Arctic–alpine plants and vegetation can serve as a barometer of global change. Therefore, research on this group of plants is highly valuable.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Alain Müller, Yann Fragnière, and Benoît Clément from the Botanical Garden of the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) and Peter Wandeler from the Natural History Museum in Fribourg (NHMF, Switzerland) for their long-standing support.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Körner, C. Alpine Plant Life. Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bliss, L.C. Adaptations of arctic and alpine plants to environmental conditions. Arctic 1962, 15, 117–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Crawford, R.M.M. Plants at the Margin. Ecological Limits and Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Niskanen, A.K.J.; Niittynen, P.; Aalto, J.; Väre, H.; Luoto, M. Lost at high latitudes: Arctic and endemic plants under threat as climate warms. Divers. Distrib. 2018, 25, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monz, C.A. The response of two arctic tundra plant communities to human trampling disturbance. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 2, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Körner, C. Concepts in alpine plant ecology. Plants 2023, 12, 2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hörandl, E. Geographical parthenogenesis in alpine and arctic plants. Plants 2023, 12, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wagner, N.D.; Marinček, P.; Pittet, L.; Hörandl, E. Insights into the taxonomically challenging hexaploidy alpine shrub willows of Salix section Phylicifoliae and Nigricantes (Salicaceae). Plants 2023, 12, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kozlowski, G.; Fragnière, Y.; Clément, B.; Meade, C. Genome size in the Arenaria ciliata species complex (Caryophyllaceae), with special focus on A. ciliata subsp. bernensis, a narrow endemic of the Swiss Northern Alps. Plants 2022, 11, 3489. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Kozlowski, G.; Fragnière, Y.; Clément, B.; Gilg, O.; Sittler, B.; Lang, J.; Eidsen, P.B.; Lang, S.I.; Wasowicz, P.; Meade, C. Genome size in the Arenaria ciliata species complex (Caryophyllaceae), with special focus on Northern Europe and the Arctic. Plants 2024, 13, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Walas, Ł.; Pietras, M.; Mazur, M.; Romo, Á.; Tasenkevich, L.; Didukh, Y.; Boratyński, A. The perspective of arctic-alpine species in southernmost localities. The example of Kalmia procumbens in the Pyrenees and Carpathians. Plants 2023, 12, 3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, H.-T.; Wang, W.-T. Prediction of the potential distribution of the endangered species Meconopsis punicea Maxim under future climate change based on four species distribution models. Plants 2023, 12, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chardon, N.I.; Ston, P.; Hilbert, C.; Maclachlan, T.; Ragsdal, B.; Zhao, A.; Goodwin, K.; Collins, C.G.; Hewitt, N.; Elphinstone, C. Species-specific response to human trampling indicate alpine plant size is more sensitive than reproduction to disturbance. Plants 2023, 12, 3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oberhuber, W.; Dobler, A.-L.; Heinzle, T.; Scandurra, F.; Gruber, A.; Wieser, G. Climate overrides the influence of microsite conditions on radial growth of the tall multi-stemmed shrub Alnus alnobetula at treeline. Plants 2023, 12, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. López, V.L.; Bottan, L.; Pastur, G.M.; Lencinas, M.V.; Cuyckens, G.A.E.; Vellini, J.M. Characterization of Polylepis tarapacana life forms in the highest-elevation Altiplano in South America: Influence of the topography, climate and human uses. Plants 2023, 12, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kozlowski, G. Understanding Arctic–Alpine Plants from Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Plants 2024, 13, 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111560

AMA Style

Kozlowski G. Understanding Arctic–Alpine Plants from Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Plants. 2024; 13(11):1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kozlowski, Gregor. 2024. "Understanding Arctic–Alpine Plants from Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives" Plants 13, no. 11: 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop