Next Article in Journal
Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica) Is a New Natural Host of Tomato Mosaic Virus and Citrus Exocortis Viroid
Previous Article in Journal
O-Glycosyltransferase Gene BnaC09.OGT Involved in Regulation of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Biosynthesis for Enhancing Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Brassica napus L.
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Genus Eranthis: Prospects of Research on Its Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, and Biotechnology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Chemical Composition among the Multi Colored Germplasm of Abrus precatorius L.

by
Prabakaran Sampath
1,*,
Sowmyapriya Rajalingam
1,
Sharmila Murugesan
1,
Rakesh Bhardwaj
2,* and
Veena Gupta
3
1
The Graduate School, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India
2
Division of Germplasm Evaluation, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110012, India
3
Division of Germplasm Conservation, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110012, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(14), 1963; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141963
Submission received: 7 June 2024 / Revised: 5 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 18 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Research on the Medicinal Value of Plants)

Abstract

:
The medicinal plant Abrus precatorius L. was traditionally used in the Siddha and Ayurvedic systems of medicine in India. The Indian center of origin holds a vast variability in its seed color. The objective of this study was to assess the total monomeric anthocyanin, flavonol, as well as the antioxidative potential, protein content and ash content among the accessions. A total of 99 accessions conserved in the Indian National Genebank were used in this study. The methods used for the estimation of total monomeric anthocyanin, flavonol, as well as the antioxidative potential, protein content and ash content were the pH differential method, Oomah method, Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential, Dumas method and gravimetric method, respectively. The completely black colored accession was recorded with highest total monomeric anthocyanin (51.95 mg/100 g of cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalent) and flavonol content (66.41 mg/g of quercetin equivalent). Red + black colored accessions have recorded the maximum value with respect to antioxidants (14.18 mg/g of gallic acid equivalent). The highest amount of protein content was found in a completely white colored accession (20.67%) and the maximum ash content was recorded in red + black colored accession (4.01%). The promising accessions identified can be used by pharmaceutical companies in drug development and in curing degenerative diseases.

1. Introduction

Abrus precatorius L. is a medicinal herb native to the Indian subcontinent. The genus name Abrus was derived from Latin, which denotes “graceful” or “beautiful” [1]. It connotes the attractive appearance of its seed. The vast genetic variability of the species occurs throughout the country. It was commonly known as Indian liquorice, and belongs to the family fabaceae. However, the plant was known by different names in various parts of the world, such as Gunja, Rosary pea, Crab’s eye, and Jequerity bean [2]. In the outer Himalyan region, it was found at an altitude of up to 1200 m above sea level [3]. Due to the presence of toxic albumin abrin, the seeds should not be consumed without detoxification [4]. Even a very small quantity of abrin (0.1–1 μg/kg) can cause death in humans [5]. In the Ayurvedic texts of India, various detoxification techniques were available. The process was called “Shodhana”, which denotes the removal of the toxic chemical compound without affecting its efficacy in curing diseases [6].
In the traditional system of medicine, the plant was known for the treatment of various diseases or health problems [3], such as rheumatic arthritis and dysentery, and it was also used as an aphrodisiac and an abortifacient [2,3,7,8]. It was observed that the seed kernel was mainly comprised of protein, but the oil and starch content were low. The seeds were rich in mineral nutrients like phosphorous, sulfur, potassium, calcium, magnesium and iron. The entire plant (roots, leaves and seeds) was used in the Siddha, Unani and Ayurvedic systems of medicine [7]. The previous workers have reported that the seed extract was found to possess anti-cancer activity [9]. In ethanobotany, the leaf extract from Abrusosides A–D, four novel sweet-tasting triterpene glycosides from the leaves of Abrus precatorius, was known for curing rabies, tetanus, cat and dog bites [3]. The sweet taste of the leaves was due to the presence of these compounds, which means it is 30 to 100 times sweeter than that of sucrose [10]. In folk medicine, a paste of the leaves or root was used as a remedy for a snake bite. The root powder can also be applied topically [11]. The leaves were found to be the ideal material for the production of silver nanoparticles, and possess good antibacterial activity [12]. The detoxified seeds (by boiling) of A. precatorius are eaten as food by the residents of Andaman and Nicobar Islands in India. The Onges tribe consumes them when food is scarce. Ratti seeds are rich in essential amino acids, except cysteine and threonine [13]. The calorific value of Abrus seeds is better in terms of food energy value than any other fabaceae seeds. However, the heat labile antinutritional components have to be removed by proper cooking [7]. The Indian center of origin represents the vast genetic variability for seed color. The previous studies, which were mentioned above, were carried out with only very few accessions. However, the present experiment was carried out with 99 accessions, collected from different regions in India. Also, none of the earlier researchers have conducted the experiments by including the entire variability for the seed color present in the region. Most of them focused only on red + black seed color combinations. However, various other seed color accessions were not included in their study. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in the chemical constituents among the multi seed colored Abrus germplasm.

2. Results

2.1. Total Monomeric Anthocyanin (mg/g of QE)

From Table 1, it was observed that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of the means of all the accessions through least significant difference (LSD) indicated significant differences among them, with the critical difference value of 8.06. The observed mean value of total monomeric anthocyanin among the Ratti accessions studied was 23.04 ± 1.22 mg/100 g of CGE, and the median value was 27.07 mg/100 g of CGE (Table 2). The samples were recorded with a range of 51.95 mg/100 g of CGE. The completely black colored accession was reported with the maximum value of total monomeric anthocyanin, i.e., 51.95 mg/100 g of CGE, whereas it was absent in complete white, cream + brown and pink + brown accessions. The top three accessions that recorded the highest amount of total monomeric anthocyanin were IC0605143 (51.95 mg/100 g of CGE), IC0405311 (49.83 mg/100 g of CGE) and IC0401666 (47.63 mg/100 g of CGE), as given in Table 3. All three of these accessions had the black seed coat color. The mean value of the total monomeric anthocyanin (mg/100 g of CGE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Flavonols (mg/g of QE)

From Table 1, it can be observed that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of the means of all the accessions through least significant difference (LSD) indicated significant differences among them, with the critical difference value of 12.75. The average amount of flavonol content among the 99 Ratti accessions studied was 42.23 ± 0.83 mg/g of QE, and the median value was 44.04 mg/g of QE. The accessions were recorded with a range of 40.80 mg/g of QE (Table 2). The completely white colored accession was recorded with the lowest amount of flavonols, i.e., 25.61 mg/g by IC0545109, whereas the completely black colored accession was recorded with the highest amount of flavonols, i.e., 66.41 mg/g by IC0405311. From Table 3, it can be observed that the top three accessions which were observed with the highest amount of flavonols were IC0405311 (66.41 mg/g), IC0401666 (64.31 mg/g) and IC0605143 (59.91 mg/g). All three of these accessions which were recorded with the highest amount of flavonols had a black seed coat color. The mean value of flavonol (mg/g of QE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions is shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Antioxidants (mg/g of GAE)

One of the important applications of Abrus in the pharmaceutical industry made use of its antioxidant property [14,15]. From Table 1, it can be observed that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of the means of all the accessions through least significant difference (LSD) indicated significant differences among them, with the critical difference value of 0.76. Among the accessions studied, the mean value of antioxidant was 10.24 ± 0.45 mg/g of GAE, and the median value of antioxidant was 11.65 mg/g of GAE (Table 2). Its range in the accessions studied was 13.42 mg/g of GAE. The minimum value with respect to antioxidants was recorded for the white colored Ratti accessions, i.e., 0.76 mg/g of GAE by IC0545109. On the other hand, the maximum value with respect to antioxidants was recorded for the red + black color combination of Ratti accessions, i.e., 14.18 mg/g of GAE by IC0405295. From Table 3, it can be observed that the top three accessions with the highest amount of antioxidants were IC0405295 (14.18 mg/g), IC0385638 (14.13 mg/g) and IC0405311 (14.07 mg/g). The mean value of antioxidants (mg/g of GAE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions is shown in Figure 3.

2.4. Protein Content

The boiled seeds were consumed as food by the Onges tribe in India [13]. From Table 1, it can be observed that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of the means of the all accessions through least significant difference (LSD) indicated significant differences among them, with the critical difference value of 3.84. Among the accessions studied, the average value of protein content was 17.99 ± 0.11%, and the median value of protein content was 18.03% (Table 2). Its range among the accessions studied was 5.23%. The minimum value of protein content was recorded by the completely white colored Ratti accession, i.e., 15.43% by IC0392840. The highest amount of protein content (%) was also found in the complete white colored accession, i.e., IC0385644 (20.67%). From Table 3, it can be observed that the top three accessions with the highest amount of protein content were IC0385644 (20.67%), IC0538733 (20.41%) and IC0349819 (20.17%). The mean value of protein content (%) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions is shown in Figure 4.

2.5. Ash Content

From Table 1, it can be observed that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance. Furthermore, a pairwise comparison of the means of all the accessions through least significant difference (LSD) indicated significant differences among them, with the critical difference value of 1.71. The ash content of Abrus sample helps in estimating the amount of inorganic residues left after ignition. Based on the analysis of ash content in Abrus seeds, it was found that the mean value was 3.28 ± 0.04%, and the median value was 3.34% (Table 2). The range was estimated as 1.93%. The minimum value of ash content was recorded for the red + black seed colored Ratti accession, i.e., 2.08% by IC0310646. The maximum amount of ash content (%) was also observed in the red + black seed colored accession, i.e., IC0418119 (4.01%). From Table 3, it can be noted that IC0418119 (4.01%), IC0310855 (4.00%) and IC0469946 (3.95%) were the top three accessions with the highest amount of ash content. The mean value of ash content (%) among the different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions studied is shown in Figure 5.

2.6. Grouping Comparison with ANOVA and Further Post Hoc Tests (Tukey’s HSD Test)

All the 99 accessions were categorized into five groups based on seed color, i.e., complete black, red + black, complete white, cream + brown and pink + brown. The statistical variation among and within groups was studied using ANOVA and further post hoc tests (Tukey’s HSD test), which is shown in Table 4. Based on the analysis, it was found that highly significant variation exists at a 1% level of significance between various groups for biochemical parameters, like total monomeric anthocyanin, flavonols and antioxidant content. For protein content and ash content, there exists no significant variation between the groups. Similarly, the variation within the group for all biochemical parameters was non-significant.
The mean total monomeric anthocyanin of the different color groups is shown in Table 5. It was observed that completely black colored accessions differ significantly from the other groups. Similarly, red + black accessions differ significantly from the other groups. All the remaining color groups, viz. complete white, cream + brown and pink + brown, do not show significant differences. The mean flavonol content of different color groups is shown in Table 6. It was noted that completely black colored accessions differ significantly from other groups. Similarly, red + black accessions differ significantly from the other groups, but the pink + brown and cream + brown accessions were statistically on par. Similarly, cream + brown and complete white accessions were statistically on par. The mean antioxidant content of the different color groups is shown in Table 7. It was found that complete black and red + black accessions were statistically on par. Similarly, pink + brown, cream + brown and complete white were statistically on par.

2.7. Correlation Analysis

The correlation analysis was carried out to study the association among various biochemical parameters in Abrus germplasm. The result of the correlation analysis is presented in Figure 6 (Software used: R studio version 4.2.3.) [16]. Based on the scale, the degree association between various traits was studied [17]. There exists a highly significant, very strong and positive association between antioxidants and anthocyanin (r = 0.92), antioxidants and flavonols (r = 0.87) and anthocyanin and flavonols (r = 0.92). On the contrary, the association among the other parameters studied was found to be non-significant. Previous studies have reported that the antioxidant activity of Abrus extracts was positively correlated with the total phenol content. It was also reported that the total phenol content was associated with total flavonoid content [18]. Similarly, a strong correlation between total phenol content, total flavonoid content and their antioxidant activities in Abrus cantoniensis and Abrus mollis was reported [19].

3. Discussion

Previous studies on the seed composition of Abrus precatorius were very limited. The average values of the total monomeric anthocyanin content among complete black and red + black accessions were 49.8 and 27.68 mg/100 g of CGE. Previous studies have reported 60.44 ± 0.50 CGE/100 g as the total anthocyanin content from the crude extract of A. precatorius seed coat [20]. The mean flavonol content of the complete black, complete white, cream + brown, pink + brown and red + black seeded accessions were recorded as 63.54 mg/g, 26.84 mg/g, 27.66 mg/g, 33.28 mg/g and 44.98 mg/g of QE, respectively. Most of the previous studies were focused on the estimation of total flavonoid content of the leaves. It was reported that the total flavonoid content of different extracts of Abrus leaves, viz. ethanol, water, and petroleum ether, were 14.43 ± 1.35, 20.84 ± 1.97, 1.6 ± 0.41 mg/g of QE dry extract [21]. The hydro-methanolic extract of the seed contains the total flavonoid content of 73.33 ± 2.36 mg/g of a rutin equivalent (RE) [22]. The mean antioxidant content of the complete black, complete white, cream + brown, pink + brown and red + black seeded accessions were recorded as 13.6 mg/g, 1.13 mg/g, 1.96 mg/g, 2.37 mg/g and 12.27 mg/g of GAE, respectively. Previous researchers have observed that the antioxidant capacity of methanolic leaf extracts was at maximum, with a low IC50 value of 62.86 ± 0.68 µg/mL [23]. The leaf extract was found to have an antioxidative potential ranging between 2.67 ± 0.40 to 13.34 ± 0.35 mg/g of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) [14]. The previous studies have mentioned its pharmacological potential by estimating the polyphenol content [18,20,21,22,24]. The mean protein content of the complete black, complete white, cream + brown, pink + brown and red + black seeded accessions were recorded as 18.10%, 18.11%, 17.84%, 18.54% and 17.96%, respectively. The protein content of the Abrus seed was previously studied by a few researchers using the Kjeldahl method [13]. Their study revealed the protein content as 16.28% which was closer to that of Australian pulse crop, Cassia notabilis. Some researchers have studied the crude protein content in the leaves of Abrus precatorius. Based on their study, the protein content was estimated as 8% in the leaves [23]. The mean ash content of the complete black, complete white, cream + brown, pink + brown and red + black seeded accessions were recorded as 3.27%, 3.40%, 3.13%, 3.12% and 3.27%, respectively. It was reported that the ash content of Abrus seeds was 3.36% [13]. They also mentioned that the value of ash content was similar to that of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Narrowleaf lupin (Lupins angustifolius and L. hispanicus). Some early investigations were carried out on the ash content of Abrus leaves. Based on their study, the amount of ash content in Abrus leaves was 7.00 ± 1.41% [23]. Abrus pulchellus and A. precatorius differ from each other in terms of their ash content. The former was recorded as 3.75%, whereas the latter was recorded with only 2.75% [25]. A few earlier studies have estimated the ash content in its different forms, viz. acid insoluble ash, water soluble ash and sulphated ash content [26,27,28]. The amount of acid insoluble ash, water soluble ash and sulphated ash in Abrus root powder was estimated as 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.08%, respectively [26]. The total ash content in the Abrus roots was estimated as 7.01% [27]. The acid insoluble ash content and water soluble ash content of Abrus seeds were found to be 1.0% and 3.17%, respectively [28]. A grouping comparison with ANOVA and further post hoc tests (Tukey’s HSD test) revealed that for all the three biochemical parameters, complete black and red + black differ significantly from the other color groups. Accessions with different seed colors vary significantly in terms of their bioactive constituents. The present investigation provides experimental proof that Abrus seeds contain considerable amounts of total monomeric anthocyanin (except complete white, cream + brown and pink + brown colored accessions), flavonols and antioxidants.
The findings of the experiment were most reliable, as it was conducted using the accessions representing the entire Indian sub-continent (except north eastern India). Though the focus of other studies was only on red + black seed color, this experimental result represents the entire genetic variability present in the region. Most of the previous research work was carried out on its leaves, but the present work was carried out on the seeds with different color combinations. However, the major limitation of this research was the fact that the exotic collections (accessions from regions other than India) were not included in the study (as they were not present in the Indian National Genebank). Clinical trials to understand their mechanisms were not conducted in the present study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Seed Material

A total of 99 accessions were chosen based on germination % and seed quantity from the Indian National Genebank, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR). These accessions represent the different agro-ecological zones of India, with the exception of north east India. Seeds from the Genebank were planted at two locations, which were NBPGR regional station, Ranchi, and NBPGR experimental farm, Issapur, and the derived seeds were used for various tests. The five main groups, based on the seed color (as shown in Figure 7) and their corresponding RHS color code, were as follows: red + black combination (43A + 202A), pink + brown combination (65D + 199D), cream + brown combination (156D + 199B), complete black (202A + 42B) and complete white color (155C). The number of accessions present in the red + black combination, the cream + brown combination, the pink + brown combination, as well as complete black and complete white colors, were seventy-seven, five, two, three and twelve respectively. All the samples were indigenous collections (IC). The list of accessions, seed color, and their passport data were given in Appendix A (Table A1).

4.2. Estimation of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content by pH Differential Method

This method was based on the color change in monomeric anthocyanin, reversible with a change in pH. The materials required are standard buffer solutions, pH meter—standardized with pH 4.0 and 7.0 (RC-12, Radicon, Surat, India), volumetric flasks (50 mL), a spectrophotometer (XD 7500, BenchTop Lab Systems, Saint Louis, MO, USA), and a cuvette (1 cm path length).

4.2.1. Reagents Required

Potassium chloride (0.025 M) (Anish chemical, Bhavnagar, India, 99.5%, CAS: 07-09-7440): Weigh 1.86 g KCl and transfer it into a beaker. Then, add 980 mL distilled water. Adjust the pH to 1.0 with HCl (Merckmillipore, Bangalore, India, 37%, 7647-01-0), then transfer it to a volumetric flask of 1 L and make up the required volume using distilled water. Sodium acetate (0.4 M) (Vinpul chemicals, Vadodara, India, 99%, 127-09-3): For this, measure 54.43 g of sodium acetate trihydrate and add 960 mL of distilled water. Adjust the pH to 4.5 with HCl, and then transfer it to a volumetric flask of 1 L. Finally, make up the required volume using distilled water.

4.2.2. Procedure for Estimation of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin Pigment Content

Weigh 0.1 g of the sample and transfer it into a 15 mL centrifuge tube. Add 10 mL of 0.1 N HCl into the tube and keep it in rotospin (Cat: 3090 Rotospin rotary mixer, Dhana foundations and technology (DFT), Chennai, India) overnight so that the contents mix properly. After that, centrifuge the tubes at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. Pipette out 500 µL of supernatant in two different glass tubes. Then, transfer 1500 µL of HCl in one tube and 1500 µL of sodium acetate in another tube and mix the contents to prepare the buffer. Blank 1 for pH 1.0 buffer: pipette out 500 µL of 0.1 N HCl into a glass tube and add 1500 µL of HCl into it. Blank 2 for pH 4.5 buffer: pipette out 500 µL of 0.1 N HCl into a glass tube and add 1500 µL of sodium acetate into it. Keep them in room temperature for 30 min and vortex them to mix the contents. Take an absorbance reading at 520 and 700 nm. If the test portion is turbid, then centrifuge it to clarify them. Another method is to use a filter (Millipore TM membrane filter, 1.2 mm pore size). The unit for measuring the total monomeric anthocyanin was mg/100 g of cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalent (CGE). Anthocyanin content was calculated using the formula below:
Anthocyanin = A × MW × DF × v × 102/ε × l × W
where
  • A (Absorbance) = (A520 nm–A700 nm) at pH 1.0–(A520 nm–A700 nm) at pH 4.5;
  • MW (Molecular weight) = 449.2 g/mol;
  • DF = Dilution factor;
  • l = Path length in cm;
  • ε = 26,900 molar extinction coefficient (M−1cm−1);
  • W—Weight of sample (g) and
  • V—Volume of test solution (mL)

4.3. Flavonol Estimation by OOMAH Method

This involves the formation of an acid stable and acid labile complex formed by flavonol, which has maximum absorbance at 360 nm [29].

4.3.1. Reagents Required

The following reagents were required for flavonol estimation: 75%, 80% and 95% ethanol (Merckmillipore, Bangalore, India, 99.9%, 64-17-5), 2% HCl (Merckmillipore, India, 37%, 7647-01-0) in 75% ethanol and the quercetin standard (Lobachemie, Mumbai, India, 95%, 849061-97-8). The stock concentration of quercetin should be 1 mg/mL. This can be prepared by dissolving 25 mg of quercetin in 25 mL of 95% ethanol. The working standard can be prepared by pipetting 4 mL from the stock solution and then making up the volume to 50 mL by using 95% ethanol.

4.3.2. Procedure for Flavonol Estimation

The sample (200 mg) was extracted with 80% aqueous ethanol (10 mL). The samples were centrifuged (10,000 RPM for 10 min) and the supernatants were recovered. A total of 100 μL of the sample was placed in a test tube. Add 2.4 mL of 2% HCl in 75% ethanol. Prepare the standard with different concentrations (16, 32, 48, 64, 80 μg/mL) and blank. These were labeled as S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and then blanked. The working solution of quercetin and 80% ethanol was used to prepare standards of different concentrations. In the blank, working solution was not added, i.e., the 100 μL were made up with 80% ethanol. The sample and standards were prepared at the same time. Stir the contents by using a vortex and keep it for 30 min at room temperature. Then, measure the absorbance at 360 nm by using a spectrophotometer (XD 7500, BenchTop Lab Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA). The spectrophotometer readings for different standards were recorded and the values were plotted in a graph. Then, the spectrophotometer readings for the samples were noted down. Based on the graph, the amount of flavonol in the samples was estimated. The results were expressed as mg/g of the quercetin equivalent (mg/g of QE) of the sample.

4.4. Estimation of Antioxidants by Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential (FRAP)

The FRAP method is based on the reduction potential of complex Ferric-tripyridyltriazine (Fe3+-TPTZ) to a blue-colored Ferrous-tripyridyltriazine (Fe2+-TPZ) complex form by antioxidants at a lower pH [30].

4.4.1. Reagents

The reagents required were as follows: 0.1 M acetate at pH 3.6. This can be prepared by dissolving 8.2 g of sodium acetate (Vinpul chemicals, India, 99%, 127-09-3) in 1 L of distilled water. The 20 mM Ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O) can be prepared by dissolving 8.1 mg Ferric chloride (Alphachemika, Mumbai, India, 98%, 7705-08-0) in 2.5 mL of distilled water. The 10 mM Tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) can be prepared by dissolving 8.34 mg of TPTZ (SRL chemicals, Mumbai, India, 99%, 3682-35-7) in 2.5 mL of 40 mM HCl (Merckmillipore, India, 37%, 7647-01-0). The Gallic acid (Oxford Lab Fine Chem LLP, Navghar, India, 99.5, 5995-86-8) was used as the standard stock solution, which was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g Gallic acid in 100 mL of distilled water. The working standard 1 was prepared by pipetting 10 mL of stock solution and then making up the volume to 100 mL. After that, working standard 2 was prepared by pipetting 10 mL of working standard 1 and then making up the volume to 100 mL. From working standard 2 take 50 µL, 100 µL, 150 µL, 200 µL, 250 µL and 300 µL and make up their volume to 300 µL by using distilled water. The blank was prepared with 300 µL of distilled water. FRAP reagent was freshly prepared by combining the above reagents (acetate, TPTZ solution and ferric chloride) in 10:1:1 ratio.

4.4.2. Procedure for Antioxidant Estimation

A total of 0.1 g of sample was added into 5 mL of 80% ethanol. The contents were mixed properly by using vortex. Centrifuge the content at 10,000 RPM for 10 min and collect the supernatant. The volume of sample required varies among the accessions with different seed color, i.e., 20 µL of red + black colored accessions, 20 µL completely black colored accessions and 100 µL of white colored accessions. Add 2200 µL of freshly prepared FRAP reagent to the sample taken in test tubes. Make up the final volume to 2500 µL (i.e., 280 µL of distilled water for red + black colored accessions, 280 µL for completely black colored accessions and 200 µL for white colored accessions). Then, vortex each test tube and incubate it at room temperature for 30 min. During incubation it turns an indigo blue color. Note down the absorbance reading by using a UV spectrophotometer (XD 7500, BenchTop Lab Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 593 nm. Prepare standards (S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5) and blank. The unit for measuring antioxidant activity was mg/g of gallic acid equivalent (GAE)

4.5. Determination of Protein Content by Dumas Method

This method was based on the determination of total nitrogen content in the sample of organic matrix via subsequent oxidation and reduction by Dumas instrument (Analysensysteme GmbH, Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany). The sample is combusted at very high temperature (700–1000 °C) in the presence of oxygen. The gasses are produced, in which the CO2 is trapped and the remaining gasses are reduced by copper. The nitrogen produced will be detected by a thermal conductivity detector. The protein conversion factor used in this method was 6.25.

Procedure for Determination of Protein Content

Inject the samples into a combustion tube (940 °C) along with oxygen. The gathering ring in the combustion tube increases the temperature up to 1800 °C during combustion. This results in oxidation and halogen trapping (silver cobalt and chromium sesquioxide). This was followed by reduction (nitrogen oxides into nitrogen by copper at 700 °C). The chromatography helps in the separation of nitrogen and methane. Unmeasured elements like H2O and CO2 are trapped using anhydrone and ascarite, respectively. After chromatography, the detection of nitrogen was carried out by catharometer and further data processing took place. The procedures involved were as follows: Weigh 0.1 g of sample and place it properly at the hole position in the instrument. Aspartic acid (Alchemax, Hyderabad, India, 98%, 1783-96-6) was used as the standard. Properly close the lid and run the samples. Then, the instrument will burn the sample and record the protein content per 100 g of sample.

4.6. Estimation of Ash Content by Gravimetric Method

Ash is an inorganic residue that remains after the removal of water and organic matter in the presence of oxidizing agents by heat. It helps in measuring the total minerals within the sample, and the unit was gram of ash per 100 g sample.

4.6.1. Materials Required

4 N Nitric acid (Choice Organochem, Hyderabad, India, 98%, 7697-37-2), Furnace (BST/MF/900, Bionics Scientific, New Delhi, India), an analytical balance (Model ATX224R, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), an air oven (LBS-AG-1, Labsol Enterprises, Gurugram, India), tongs, a spatula and a silica dish.

4.6.2. Procedure for Estimation of Ash Content

Initially, keep the crucible in the furnace for 2–3 h at 500–550 °C. After some time, transfer the crucible to the oven (100 °C for 1–2 h) to reduce the temperature of crucible to 100 °C, and the weight should be noted immediately as W1. Again, take 2–4 g dry samples in replicates in the crucible and note it as W2. For the burning of the sample, place the crucible that contains the samples in a furnace at 180 °C for 1 h and gradually increase the temperature up to 250 °C for 1 h. Maintain the samples in the furnace for 3 h at 450 °C. This temperature is achieved by gradually increasing temperature (50 °C) at a 30 min interval from 180 °C to 450 °C. Check whether the sample is completely dried to a white-colored ash form or not. If not properly dried, then add concentrated nitric acid (2–3 drops). After that, evaporate it in water bath and repeat the same heating procedure in the furnace (30–60 min) until the stable reading is achieved. Again, decrease the temperature of the furnace and take the weight (W3) at 100 °C. The ash content was measured by g per 100 g.
Ash   content = ( W 3 W 1 ) ( W 2 W 1 ) × 100
  • W1—weight of crucible (g),
  • W2—weight of crucible + sample (g) and
  • W3—weight of crucible + ash (g).

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were evaluated by a one-way analysis of variance, and comparison was carried out by least significant difference (LSD) by using the software WASP 2.0 (Web Based Agricultural Statistics Software Package). A grouping comparison with ANOVA and further post hoc tests (Tukey’s HSD test) was carried out using SPSS Statistics v29. If the p-value was <0.05, there exists a statistically significant difference among the accessions. All the 99 treatments or accessions were replicated three times and the final results were shown as the mean values. Correlation analysis was performed by using the Karl Pearson correlation coefficient and the software used was R studio version 4.2.3.

5. Conclusions

Herbal medicines are gaining momentum among the people, as they cause no or less side effects than modern drugs. Based on the present investigation, the potential of Abrus precatorius in curing degenerative diseases was higher in completely black colored and red + black colored accessions. The superior accessions identified from the experiment hold huge pharmaceutical potential. The pharmaceutical companies can develop drugs which can be used for the treatment of diseases resulting from oxidative stress. In the traditional systems of medicine, like Siddha and Ayurveda, the practitioner can make use of these elite accessions identified. Future research can focus on the specific mechanisms responsible for such variations and also develop effective methods for removing the toxic constituents without affecting their pharmacological value. Proper clinical trials should be conducted for their therapeutic implications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B. and V.G.; methodology, P.S.; software, S.R. and S.M.; validation, P.S., V.G. and R.B.; formal analysis, P.S.; investigation, R.B.; resources, P.S. and V.G.; data curation, P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S.; writing—review and editing, R.B. and V.G.; visualization, S.R. and S.M.; supervision, R.B.; project administration, V.G.; funding acquisition, P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to University Grants commission (UGC) for providing financial support in the form of the Senior Research Fellowship (No. 3791/NET-DEC 2018 to P.S.).

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article. Additional details are available from the corresponding author, P.S., upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) and National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) for providing the necessary facilities and seed materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of accessions used in the biochemical analysis.
Table A1. List of accessions used in the biochemical analysis.
S. No.Accession
No.
Seed ColorPassport Data (STATE)
1IC0400492 Complete whiteKarnataka
2IC0553765 Red + blackAndaman and Nicobar Islands
3IC0418096 Red + blackMaharashtra
4IC0263011 Red + blackUttar Pradesh
5IC0545109 Complete whiteKerala
6IC0385520 Red + blackGoa
7IC0400421 Red + blackKarnataka
8IC0397770 Red + blackKerala
9IC0322320 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
10IC0405304Red + blackKerala
11IC397936Red + blackHimachal Pradesh
12IC0564539 Red + blackTamil Nadu
13IC0553727 Red + blackAndaman and Nicobar Islands
14IC0310855 Red + blackGujarat
15IC0418120 Red + blackMaharashtra
16IC0349819 Cream-brownOdisha
17IC0262948 Red + blackUttar Pradesh
18IC0260022 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
19IC0385638 Red + blackOdisha
20IC0469946 Red + blackGujarat
21IC0418116 Red + blackMaharashtra
22IC0430870 Complete whiteDelhi
23IC0345234 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
24IC261421Red + blackUttarakhand
25IC0526820 Red + blackTelangana
26IC0391898 Red + blackOdisha
27IC0329886 Red + blackRajasthan
28IC0526819 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
29IC0311747 Complete whiteAndhra Pradesh
30IC0564695 Red + blackTelangana
31IC0564732 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
32IC0306198 Cream-brownGujarat
33IC0280795 Red + blackTamil Nadu
34IC0392859 Red + blackOdisha
35IC0322486 Complete whiteAndhra Pradesh
36IC0261023 Red + blackTelangana
37IC0392839 Cream-brownOdisha
38IC0469934 Red + blackGujarat
39IC0392840 Complete whiteOdisha
40IC0405295 Red + blackKerala
41IC0261408 Red + blackUttarakhand
42IC0391892 Red + blackOdisha
43IC0469932 Red + blackGujarat
44IC0392838 Red + blackOdisha
45IC0261401 Red + blackUttarakhand
46IC0315333 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
47IC0263057 Red + blackUttar Pradesh
48IC0392836 Red + blackOdisha
49IC0470438 Red + blackRajasthan
50IC0470922 Red + blackWest Bengal
51IC0385635 Complete whiteOdisha
52IC0470979 Cream-brownWest Bengal
53IC0418103 Red + blackMaharashtra
54IC0552617 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
55IC0401666 Complete blackTamil Nadu
56IC0308748 Red + blackChattisgarh
57IC0310926 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
58IC0405305 Pink + brownKerala
59IC0392846 Cream-brownOdisha
60IC0469939 Red + blackGujarat
61IC0392860Pink + brownOdisha
62IC0310646 Red + blackRajasthan
63IC0281057 Red + blackJharkhand
64IC0369145 Red + blackJharkhand
65IC0400325 Red + blackKarnataka
66IC0617322 Red + blackGujarat
67IC0400380 Red + blackKarnataka
68IC0254919 Complete whiteTelangana
69IC0385619 Red + blackOdisha
70IC0420958 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
71IC0391888 Red + blackOdisha
72IC0553504 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
73IC0405311 Complete blackKerala
74IC0469963 Red + blackGujarat
75IC0605143Complete blackGujarat
76IC0349804 Red + blackOdisha
77IC0603047 Complete whiteKerala
78IC0588655 Red + blackDelhi
79IC0337202 Red + blackOdisha
80IC0385644 Complete whiteOdisha
81IC0418119 Red + blackMaharashtra
82IC0310647 Complete whiteRajasthan
83IC0430717 Red + blackRajasthan
84IC0617321 Red + blackGujarat
85IC0469967 Red + blackGujarat
86IC0627451 Red + blackMadhya Pradesh
87IC0371792 Red + blackTamil Nadu
88IC0337216 Red + blackOdisha
89IC0395270 Complete whiteChattisgarh
90IC0418115 Red + blackMaharashtra
91IC0538733 Red + blackHimachal Pradesh
92IC0605146 Red + blackGujarat
93IC0370449 Red + blackRajasthan
94IC0316266 Red + blackGujarat
95IC0619016 Red + blackAndhra Pradesh
96IC0306236 Red + blackOdisha
97IC376080Red + blackUnknown
98IC0469931 Red + blackGujarat
99IC0418097 Red + blackMaharashtra

References

  1. Boddupalli, R.S. Traditional use of legume seeds for weighing gold in India. Indian J. Hist. Sci. 2020, 55, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Santhosam, S.D.; Selvam, P.; Danodia, A. Phytochemical Analysis of Abrus precatorius Seeds: A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2023, 79, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Garaniya, N.; Bapodra, A. Ethno botanical and Phytopharmacological potential of Abrus precatorius L.: A review. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, S27–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Adedapo, A.A.; Omoloye, O.A.; Ohore, O.G. Studies on the toxicity of an aqueous extract of the leaves of Abrus precatorius (L.) on rats. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 2007, 74, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dickers, K.J.; Bradberry, S.M.; Rice, P.; Griffiths, G.D.; Vale, J.A. Abrin poisoning. Toxicol. Rev. 2003, 22, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roy, S.; Acharya, R.; Shukla, V.J. Shodhana (processing) of Gunja (Abrus precatorius Linn.) seeds with godugdha (cow’s milk); a pharmaceutical analysis. Int. J. Ayurvedic Med. 2012, 3, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chakradhari, S.; Patel, K.S.; Towett, E.K.; Ramos, P.M.; Gnatowski, A. Chemical composition of Abrus precatorius (L.) seeds. Eur. J. Med. Plants 2019, 28, 48701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nautiyal, M.; Bahuguna, A.; Chauhan, J.S.; Singh, B. Effect of some pre-sowing scarification treatment on water uptake and germination of Abrus precatorious L. (Ratti). Res. J. Seed. Sci. 2014, 7, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaur, A.; Sharma, Y.; Kumar, A.; Ghosh, M.P.; Bala, K. In-vitro antiproliferative efficacy of Abrus precatorius seed extracts on cervical carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, Y.H.; Hussain, R.A.; Pezzuto, J.M.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Morton, J.F. Abrusosides A–D, four novel sweet-tasting triterpene glycosides from the leaves of Abrus precatorius. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 1118–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Upasani, S.V.; Beldar, V.G.; Tatiya, A.U.; Upasani, M.S.; Surana, S.J.; Patil, D.S. Ethno medicinal plants used for snakebite in India: A brief overview. Integr. Med. Res. 2017, 6, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gaddala, B.; Nataru, S. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of silver nanoparticles through leaves of Abrus precatorius L.: An important medicinal plant. Appli. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rajaram, N.; Janardhanan, K. The chemical composition and nutritional potential of the tribal pulse, Abrus precatorius (L.). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1992, 42, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gul, M.Z.; Ahmad, F.; Kondapi, A.K.; Qureshi, I.A.; Ghazi, I.A. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Abrus precatorius (L.) leaf extracts—An in-vitro study. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Palvai, V.R.; Mahalingu, S.; Urooj, A. Abrus precatorius (L.) leaves: Antioxidant activity in food and biological systems, pH and temperature stability. Int. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 2014, 748549. [Google Scholar]
  16. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2023; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 13 April 2024).
  17. Searle, S.R. The value of indirect selection: I. Mass selection. Biometrics 1965, 21, 682–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jain, A.; Sinha, P.; Jain, A.; Vavilala, S. Estimation of flavonoid content, polyphenolic content and antioxidant potential of different parts of Abrus precatorius (L.). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, M.; Shen, Q.; Li, L.Q.; Huang, Y.Q.; Cheung, H.Y. Phytochemical profiles, antioxidant activities of functional herb Abrus cantoniensis and Abrus mollis. Food. Chem. 2015, 177, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mobin, L.; Saeed, S.A.; Ali, R.; Saeed, S.M.G.; Ahmed, R. Antibacterial, antioxidant and phenolic compound analysis of Abrus precatorius seed coat extract and its different fractions. Pak. J. Bot. 2017, 49, 2499–2506. [Google Scholar]
  21. Farhana, F.; Ray, G.; Islam, M.A.; Chakraborty, D.; Bhattacharjee, S.C.; Das, S. Antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavonoid contents of Abrus precatorius leaf in four different extract. EAS J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2023, 5, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tabasum, S.; Khare, S.; Jain, K. Spectrophotometric quantification of total phenolic, flavonoid and alkaloid contents of Abrus precatorius (L.) seeds. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2016, 9, 371–374. [Google Scholar]
  23. Paul, E.D.; Sangodare, R.S.A.; Uroko, R.I.; Agbaji, A.S.; Dakare, M.A. Chemical analysis of leaves of Abrus precatorius. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 5, 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  24. Prabakaran, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Gupta, V. Profiling total phenolic content of different seed coloured germplasm of Ratti (Abrus precatorius). Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2021, 34, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kavya, R.; Shrungashree, R.M.; Suchitra, S.V.; Divakara, R.; Kekuda, T.R. Comparative study on antifungal activity and proximate composition of Abrus pulchellus Wall and Abrus precatorius Linn. Res. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2010, 2, 284–287. [Google Scholar]
  26. Oladimeji, A.V.; Valan, M.F. Standardization and phytochemical screening activity of Abrus Precatorius Linn. root extracts. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2021, 9, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  27. Raiza, J.A.; Mageswari, S.; Sri, M.D.P.; Meena, R.; Selvarani, R.; Ahmed, N.Z. Establishment of quality standards of Abrus precatorius L. (root) by physicochemical and HPTLC method. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 8, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saraf, A.; Saraf, A.; Chaturvedi, A. Phytochemical analysis and chemical fingerprinting of seeds of Abrus precatorius L. Chem. Sci. Trans. 2018, 7, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  29. Oomah, B.D.; Martinez, A.C.; Pina, G.L. Phenolics and antioxidative activities in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Benzie, I.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean value ± Standard deviation of total monomeric anthocyanin (mg/100 g of CGE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Figure 1. Mean value ± Standard deviation of total monomeric anthocyanin (mg/100 g of CGE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Plants 13 01963 g001
Figure 2. Mean value ± Standard deviation of flavonol (mg/g of QE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Figure 2. Mean value ± Standard deviation of flavonol (mg/g of QE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Plants 13 01963 g002
Figure 3. Mean value ± Standard deviation of antioxidants (mg/g of GAE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Figure 3. Mean value ± Standard deviation of antioxidants (mg/g of GAE) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Plants 13 01963 g003
Figure 4. Mean value ± Standard deviation of protein content (%) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Figure 4. Mean value ± Standard deviation of protein content (%) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Plants 13 01963 g004
Figure 5. Mean value ± Standard deviation of ash content (%) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Figure 5. Mean value ± Standard deviation of ash content (%) among different seed colored Abrus precatorius accessions.
Plants 13 01963 g005
Figure 6. Correlation matrix depicting the relationship between various chemical components of seeds in Abrus precatorius. *** (in the diagnol) denotes same parameters; *** (other than the diagnol) indicates highly significant correlation among various biochemical parameters.
Figure 6. Correlation matrix depicting the relationship between various chemical components of seeds in Abrus precatorius. *** (in the diagnol) denotes same parameters; *** (other than the diagnol) indicates highly significant correlation among various biochemical parameters.
Plants 13 01963 g006
Figure 7. Seed coat color diversity among the Abrus precatorius germplasm conserved at the Indian National Genebank. (a) Red + black combination; (b) pink + brown combination; (c) cream + brown combination; (d) complete black color and (e) complete white color.
Figure 7. Seed coat color diversity among the Abrus precatorius germplasm conserved at the Indian National Genebank. (a) Red + black combination; (b) pink + brown combination; (c) cream + brown combination; (d) complete black color and (e) complete white color.
Plants 13 01963 g007
Table 1. Completely randomized design (CRD) ANOVA based on biochemical parameters.
Table 1. Completely randomized design (CRD) ANOVA based on biochemical parameters.
Sourcedf Anthocyanin Flavonol Antioxidant ProteinAsh
Treatment98 293.15 **134.58 **39.16 **2.51 **0.31 **
Error99 9.3923.520.082.140.43
Total197 -----
Critical difference (CD)-8.0612.750.763.841.71
** indicates highly significant variation at a 1% level of significance.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of Abrus precatorius accessions on the basis of biochemical parameters.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of Abrus precatorius accessions on the basis of biochemical parameters.
Descriptive
Statistics
Total Monomeric
Anthocyanin
(mg/100 g of CGE)
Flavonols
(mg/g of QE)
Antioxidants
(mg/g of GAE)
Protein
Content (%)
Ash
Content (%)
Mean23.0442.2310.2417.993.28
Standard Error1.220.830.450.110.04
Median27.0744.0411.6518.033.34
Range51.9540.8013.425.231.93
Minimum0.0025.610.7615.432.08
Maximum51.9566.4114.1820.674.01
Table 3. The top three best performing accessions in Abrus precatorius accessions based on phytochemical analysis.
Table 3. The top three best performing accessions in Abrus precatorius accessions based on phytochemical analysis.
S. No.Biochemical ParametersBest Performing Accessions
1Total monomeric anthocyanin (mg/100 g of CGE)IC0605143 (51.95 mg/100 g), IC0405311 (49.83 mg/100 g) and
IC0401666 (47.63 mg/100 g)
2Flavonols (mg/g of QE)IC0405311 (66.41 mg/g), IC0401666 (64.31 mg/g) and
IC0605143 (59.91 mg/g)
3Antioxidants
(mg/g of GAE)
IC0405295 (14.18 mg/g), IC0385638 (14.13 mg/g) and
IC0405311 (14.07 mg/g)
4Protein content (%)IC0385644 (20.67%), IC0538733 (20.41%) and IC0349819 (20.17%)
5Ash content (%)IC0418119 (4.01%), IC0310855 (4.00%) and IC0469946 (3.95%)
Table 4. Grouping comparison with ANOVA.
Table 4. Grouping comparison with ANOVA.
Source of VariationSSdf AnthocyaninFlavonolAntioxidantProteinAsh
Between group231.784258.76 **127.56 **31.63 **2.16 ns0.46 ns
Within group289.64948.17 ns21.87 ns0.12 ns2.08 ns0.51 ns
Total521.4298
The denotation ** indicates the highly significant difference at a 1% level of significance and ns denotes no significant difference among the groups.
Table 5. Grouping information of based on anthocyanin by using the Tukey HSD test.
Table 5. Grouping information of based on anthocyanin by using the Tukey HSD test.
Different Color Group Mean Anthocyanin in Decreasing Order (mg/100 g of CGE)Grouping Information Based on Significance
Complete black49.80A
Red + black27.68B
Complete white0.00C
Cream + brown0.00C
Pink + brown0.00C
Table 6. Grouping information of based on flavonols by using the Tukey HSD test.
Table 6. Grouping information of based on flavonols by using the Tukey HSD test.
Different Color GroupFlavonol Mean in Decreasing Order (mg/g of QE)Grouping Information Based on Significance
Complete black63.54A
Red + black44.98B
Pink + brown33.28C
Cream + brown27.66C D
Complete white26.84D
Table 7. Grouping information of based on antioxidants by using the Tukey HSD test.
Table 7. Grouping information of based on antioxidants by using the Tukey HSD test.
Different Color GroupAntioxidants Mean in Decreasing Order
(mg/g of GAE)
Grouping Information Based on Significance
Complete black13.60A
Red + black12.27A
Pink + brown2.37B
Cream + brown1.96B
Complete white1.13B
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sampath, P.; Rajalingam, S.; Murugesan, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Gupta, V. Evaluation of Chemical Composition among the Multi Colored Germplasm of Abrus precatorius L. Plants 2024, 13, 1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141963

AMA Style

Sampath P, Rajalingam S, Murugesan S, Bhardwaj R, Gupta V. Evaluation of Chemical Composition among the Multi Colored Germplasm of Abrus precatorius L. Plants. 2024; 13(14):1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141963

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sampath, Prabakaran, Sowmyapriya Rajalingam, Sharmila Murugesan, Rakesh Bhardwaj, and Veena Gupta. 2024. "Evaluation of Chemical Composition among the Multi Colored Germplasm of Abrus precatorius L." Plants 13, no. 14: 1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13141963

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop