Next Article in Journal
Spatial Pattern of Living Woody and Coarse Woody Debris in Warm-Temperate Broad-Leaved Secondary Forest in North China
Previous Article in Journal
Sugarcane/Soybean Intercropping with Reduced Nitrogen Application Synergistically Increases Plant Carbon Fixation and Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

X-ray Microanalysis of Elemental Composition of Vitis sylvestris Pollen Grains

1
Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation, 21000 Split, Croatia
2
Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv), Svetošimunska Cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(16), 2338; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162338
Submission received: 21 June 2024 / Revised: 19 August 2024 / Accepted: 19 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Horticultural Science and Ornamental Plants)

Abstract

:
The flowering and fruit set of grapevines are determined by many morphological, physiological, and environmental factors. Although the elemental composition of pollen grains plays a crucial role in the fruit set, there is still a considerable gap in our knowledge. To date, no study has been conducted on the elemental composition of Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris (hereafter V. sylvestris) pollen grains. The aim of this work was to investigate the elemental composition of pollen grains of V. sylvestris using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). The pollen grains of ten V. sylvestris individuals (eight male and two female) and one hermaphrodite cultivar ‘Plavac mali crni’ were analyzed. SEM-EDX analysis revealed the presence of eight elements (carbon—C, oxygen—O, magnesium—Mg, phosphorus—P, potassium—K, calcium—Ca, molybdenum—Mo, and aluminum—Al) in the pollen grains. Interestingly, aluminum was detected exclusively in the pollen of the cultivated grape cultivar ‘Plavac mali crni’, while it was not present in the genotypes of V. sylvestris. No significant differences between genotypes were found for oxygen and phosphorus, while significant differences were found for other elements. Pollen dimorphism was not associated with differences in element composition, although principal component analysis separated the genotypes into two distinct groups, with two female individuals (Pak10 and Pak12) and one male (Im19) tending to form separate clusters. This study is the first report on the elemental composition of pollen grains of V. sylvestris genotypes and provides valuable insights for further studies on pollen functionality.

1. Introduction

Flower development and fruit set are of utmost importance for grapevine production, which is reflected in their formation over two seasons [1,2]. Grapevine flowering occurs at a time when a marked switch in nutritional allocation takes place [2]. Mineral nutrition involves one of the most complex interactions affecting grapevine fertility. Carbohydrates are the main source of energy and play a role in flowering and determining vine yield potential [1,2].
There is a list of nutrients that are important for grapevine flowering, with calcium, zinc, boron, and molybdenum being particularly involved [2,3]. The presence of normal and small berries in the bunch (‘millerandage’) is associated with a deficiency of zinc and boron [4]. Molybdenum has been found in relatively high concentrations in pollen compared to other parts of the vine [5]; its deficiency causes a low pollen number and viability with reduced enzymatic activity [6]. Calcium is necessary for pollen tube growth and germination [3], with several calcium-binding zones associated with the protein DEX1 in the pollen wall [7].
Pollen plays a fundamental role in grapevine reproduction. In wild grapevine (V. sylvestris), the dimorphism of pollen is well documented, differing mainly in their functionality and yield potential. Sterile pollen grains (inaperturate) are found in functionally female flowers, while fertile pollen grains (trizonocolporate) are found in hermaphroditic flowers of cultivated grapevine and functionally male flowers of V. sylvestris [8,9].
The pollen grain is surrounded by a multilayered outer surface, the pollen wall [10], which consists of an outer part exine and an inner part intine [11]. The exine is structurally more complex than any other plant cell wall [7,10], composed of sporopollenin, a biopolymer with very different amounts of hydrogen and oxygen in the general formula C90 H142 O36 [11]. The development of the pollen wall mainly involves genes and proteins that regulate lipid and polysaccharide metabolism [10]. The outer parts of the pollen are composed of fatty acids and phenolic compounds, while the inner content is related to polysaccharide metabolism. A lack of expression of lipid metabolism genes for sporopollenin biosynthesis can lead to male sterility [10]. In the Arabidopsis male sterility mutant, the endintine was thicker and the exintine was thinner. Poor nutrition by the tapetum cells (precursors of the pollen wall) was associated with low pollen fertility in cultivated grapevines [9,12].
Electron microscopy has led to a major breakthrough in palynology in the last ~60 years [11]. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), enables the detection of the elemental composition of samples [13], allowing analysis of surface depth of one to two micrometers [14]. This corresponds to the exine thickness (1 to 1.6 µm) in Vitis vinifera L. [9,15]. The analysis of pollen exines by SEM-EDX was previously not considered a suitable method due to limitations such as shallow depth, detection of elements with an atomic number of less than 10 [13,16,17], or variations in surface geometry [16]. Recently, however, this method has shown promise for nanotechnology to detect elemental deposits of disease agents, pollution, in personalized medicine, etc. [17].
The elemental composition of pollen has been analyzed in an increasing number of plant species using the SEM-EDX technique. Higher silicon and calcium content found in the exine of Impatiens sultanii was related to a thicker exine, ensuring greater pollen resistance [16]. Bucsek et al. found six elements: magnesium, phosphorus, sulfur, chlorine, potassium, and calcium as the main components of pollen in apple, pear, cherry, sour cherry, plum, almond, apricot, peach, and quince [18]. Duque et al. reported that mineral dust alters the elemental composition of air-borne pollen surface, emphasizing the influence of the sea in coastal regions [19]. Acma and Mendez recorded higher levels of potassium, sulfur, magnesium, and aluminum in the pollen of four native ginger species, with aluminum being associated with inhibition of pollen tube growth [20].
Studies on Vitis spp. pollen have recently gained attention [9,15,21], but data on the chemical composition of Vitis vinifera L. pollen are scarce. Kidman et al. investigated the nutrient composition of Shiraz grapevine pollen using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for nutrients involved in pollination and fertilization (boron, zinc, calcium, and molybdenum) [3]. The elemental composition of grapevine pollen analyzed with SEM-EDX was not found. However, interesting studies have been carried out with EDX in grapevine to characterize calcium oxalate phytolith crystals, which play a role in strengthening cell walls or serve as carbon stores [22].
The wild grapevine (V. sylvestris) in Croatia is being studied in detail as part of various projects and initiatives. Knowledge about the current distribution, morphological, and genetic traits has been collected and published in a dozen papers, including a detailed characterization of pollen microstructure [23,24]. Due to the functional dimorphism observed in pollen of female vs. hermaphrodite and male individuals, more detailed studies are needed to better understand the morphology and function of grapevine pollen. The aim of this work was to characterize the elemental content of the pollen wall of wild grapevine (V. sylvestris) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in combination with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results will contribute to a better understanding of the elemental composition of wild grapevine pollen, palaeoecology, and in a broader context, functionality of the grapevine flower.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Plant Material

Pollen from flowers of 10 V. sylvestris individuals and one V. vinifera cultivar (cv.) ‘Plavac mali crni’ (PMC) was sampled at full bloom in 2018. V. sylvestris originated from two natural sites: Paklenica National Park and Blue Lake in Imotski. Representative set of two female and eight male individuals was chosen, portraying the greater occurrence of male compared to female individuals at natural sites [24]. PMC originated from a field cultivation in the grapevine germplasm collection in Split at the Institute for Adriatic Crops and Karst Reclamation (IAC, HRV048), planted in 2006. Both compartments are growing in rain-fed environments (no artificial irrigation systems). V. sylvestris locations are shown in Figure 1, and are characterized by a typical karst relief, an arid Mediterranean climate, and nutrient-poor soils [25]. Paklenica is among the best preserved and the coldest mountainous and humid sites with an abundance of supporting plant species for vines, whereas the Imotski population near the urban center is characterized by poor accompanying flora and erosion-prone, very shallow soils with pronounced fluctuations in the water level in the lake (Figure 1).
Two inflorescences per genotype were sampled during full bloom, from 2 June to 7 June (~50% open flowers) at natural wild grape sites and in vineyards for cultivated grapevines. Inflorescences were placed in 50 mL polypropylene tubes, dried with silica-gel beads, and stored at −20 °C, until scanning electron microscopy analyses.

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Elemental Composition of Pollen

The surface of silica gel-dried pollen samples of Vitis vinifera L. was analyzed in the laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture (Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia) using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JEOL JSM-6390LV (Tokyo, Japan), as previously described [24,26,27,28].
The anthers were isolated from the flowers, placed in small vials and stored at 3–5 °C in a silica gel desiccator. After dehydration, the pollen was applied with a fine brush to aluminum sticks, covered with double-sided transparent tape for analysis. The samples were then coated with a 0.02 μm thick layer of gold using a sputter coater (BAL-TEC SCD 005, Capovani Brothers Inc., Scotia, NY, USA). Initially, ~30 pollen grains per genotype were analyzed using SEM to reveal microstructure of pollen grains [24].
For the elemental composition in this study, a single pollen grain per genotype was selected and three different sections on the surface of a pollen grain were analyzed (marked as ‘boxes’ in Figure S1).
The elemental composition of the surface of pollen was determined by EDX. EDX enables the evaluation of the material. When the sample is exposed to the electron beam in the SEM, it interacts with the beam and produces characteristic X-rays. Each element has a specific emission of X-rays. EDX was performed using an X-MaxN X-ray detector (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) with the following analysis parameters: HV (high voltage) examination mode, 15 Kv accelerating voltage and 10 mm WD (working distance), signal SEI (Secondary Electron Imaging, JEOL JSM-6390LV, Tokyo, Japan), and magnification 3000×. The Aztec 2.2 software was used for elemental mapping.
Table 1 shows the mean values for the elemental composition determined from the entire scanned area (all three sections). Results for elemental composition shown in Figure 2, correspond to the yellow highlighted ‘boxes’ in Figure S1.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with HSD Tukey post hoc to test for differences between genotypes; significant differences were at values p ≤ 0.05. Genotypes were classified into groups based on elemental composition (except aluminum) using principal component analysis (PCA). The ANOVA and Tukey test were performed in STATISTICA v. 14.0 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) while for PCA, R Studio 2023.03.0 + 386 was used with FactoMineR and factoextra packages [29,30].

3. Results

3.1. Elemental Composition of the Pollen of Vitis vinifera L.

The elemental composition of pollen from 10 V. sylvestris and one V. vinifera genotypes analyzed by SEM-EDX revealed the presence of a total of eight elements: carbon, oxygen, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, molybdenum, and aluminum (Table 1, Figure 2). The most abundant element was carbon with a percentage of 70.57 to 77.82%, followed by oxygen with a percentage of about 18% in the genotypes analyzed. Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, and calcium as macronutrients were detected in a low proportion of about 1%. The micronutrient molybdenum was detected in proportions between 1.89 and 3.92%. Significant differences between individuals were found in the content of five elements (carbon, magnesium, potassium, calcium, and molybdenum), while the content of oxygen and phosphorus showed no significant differences in this study. Aluminum was detected only in the pollen grains of V. vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ (PMC).
The carbon content differed significantly only among three individuals of the Imotski population. The males Im11 (77.82%) and Im18 (77.63%) had a significantly higher carbon content than the male Im19 (70.57%) (Table 1). Molybdenum was significantly higher in two individuals from the Paklenica population (female Pak10 (3.85%) and male Pak21 (3.92%)) than in male Im18 (1.89%). Potassium content differed only between three individuals, where cv. PMC (1.53%) had significantly higher content than two male individuals (Pak11 (0.77%) and Im18 (0.56%)). Calcium content was significantly higher in female Pak10 (1.08%) than in male Pak13 (0.58%). The male Im19 (1.29%) had a higher calcium content than three male individuals from the Paklenica population (Pak19 (0.74%), Pak21 (0.66%) and Pak13 (0.58%)). The male individuals Im19 and Pak13 differed the most in calcium content. The magnesium content of cv. PMC (0.40%) and female Pak10 (0.38%) was significantly higher than that of male individuals Pak32 (0.25%), Im18 (0.19%), and Pak11 (0.17%). Cv. PMC and Pak10 together with male individuals Pak19, Pak21, and Im11 had significantly higher magnesium content than the two male individuals Im18 and Pak11. The largest significant difference in magnesium content was observed between female Pak10 and male Pak11—two neighbouring individuals. In this study, there was no substantial difference in the elemental composition of the pollen surface between V. sylvestris set and cv. PMC, with the exception of aluminum content.

3.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Based on Elemental Pollen Composition

Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to find patterns and explain the variance of elemental composition in the analyzed V. vinifera set (without aluminum) with two principal components (DMs). PCA explained 73.6% of the variance, with DM1 explaining 47.3% of the total diversity (Figure 3). Grouping the individuals along DM1 resulted in a separation into three groups. On the left side of the plot, male V. sylvestris individuals from both wild populations grouped together. None of the elements, with the exception of carbon, showed a positive correlation with this grouping, suggesting a poorer elemental composition in the male V. sylvestris individuals. Both female V. sylvestris and one male Im19 individual were grouped in the lower right of the plot. Exceptional grouping of the male Im19 with the female individuals was mainly determined by the strong positive correlation with calcium content, which was highest in Im19. The highest calcium content in this sample set, but also the highest oxygen content, could be interesting in the case of Im19, as this individual is closest to the surface of Imotski’s Blue Lake which experiences pronounced water level fluctuations. In contrast, V. vinifera cv. PMC was separated from the samples of V. sylvestris in the upper right part of the plot, due to the higher content of elements related to the quality of grapevine, such as potassium, magnesium (or phosphorus).
For DM2, accounting for 26.3% of the variation, the individuals in the lower part of the biplot differed from those in the upper part due to differences in the composition of the elements magnesium, potassium, and calcium, which exhibit the most significant differences among individuals in this sample set (Table 1).
PCA grouping based on elemental composition resulted in separation by quality and quantity of elemental composition as well as separation by flower type.

4. Discussion

The elemental composition of the pollen grains of ten V. sylvestris and one V. vinifera genotype was determined by SEM-EDX spectroscopy.
Significant differences were found for five of eight elements, with carbon accounting for the largest proportion (71–78%). This reflects the fact that pollen grains are generally a rich source of carbohydrates and germinate in a ‘sucrose’ environment [1,9,31]. A significant difference in carbon content was observed only among the male individuals of the Imotski population. The individual Im19 (Figure 1C) had the lowest carbon content, while the other two individuals had a significantly higher carbon content compared to Im19. The variations in carbon content might be related to the fluctuations of the water level in the lake during the season, as the plants in Imotski occasionally grow completely submerged [25]. Under such conditions, aquatic or terrestrial flooded plants may exhibit reduced photosynthesis and carbon uptake, and light interception is attenuated with depth [32].
Calcium is involved in the formation, composition, and stabilization of cell walls [33]. It provides rigidity to the pollen tube wall by binding to pectin carboxyl groups and is a key factor for proper pollen germination and tube growth [34,35,36,37,38]. The largest difference in calcium content between the two populations, observed in two male individuals (Im19 vs. Pak13), indicates the differences in contrasting growth conditions rather than nutrient availability or flower type. Within the Paklenica population, a significant difference in calcium content was observed only between female Pak10 (higher content) and male Pak13 (lower content). In rice, fertile pollen accumulated calcium precipitates on the surface of the pollen grains and in the anther walls, whereas in sterile pollen, calcium exudates were detected in the middle layer and not in the tapetum cells as in fertile pollen. Sterile anthers had a special cell wall between the tapetum and middle layer, indicating a different pattern of calcium accumulation and poor pollen wall formation in sterile anthers. In this way, irregularities in calcium distribution contribute to failure of pollen development [39]. The PCA grouping of female individuals, which is mainly determined by calcium content (Figure 3), is consistent with this observation. Calcium content is related to a thicker exine, which increases the resistance of pollen to harsh conditions [16], strengthens cell walls [22] and, in the case of female flowers with sterile pollen, is probably part of the excessive deposition of material on the surface of the pollen wall due to a lack of apertures [9]. Over-accumulation of calcium on the cell membranes can lead to abnormal microspore development [40]. Calcium has a particularly strong affinity to bind to the phosphate groups of all phospholipids [41]. The pollen wall contains the highest calcium content in pollen grains [40], and the specific gene DEX1 is associated with calcium binding sites in the pollen wall [7].
The third most abundant element detected in the pollen wall was molybdenum (~2 to 4%). A significant difference in molybdenum was evident among three individuals, where two individuals (female and male) from Paklenica had a molybdenum content twice as high as the male Im18 from the Imotski population. The significantly lower content in Im18 could be related to occasional water fluctuations, uneven soil depth (shallow) due to erosion [25], or poorer leaf litter and organic matter to which molybdenum binds [42,43]: in particular, water fluctuations may correlate, as molybdenum is soluble in water and oxyic systems and is present in deeper soils as it is prone to leaching [42,44]. Alternatively, but less likely, lower molybdenum content could be due to surface corrosion processes on pollen, as biodegradable and bioresorbable properties have recently been reported for this element [45,46,47].
The pollen of the cultivated variety (PMC) was mainly characterized by the content of potassium and magnesium, two elements displaying a strong positive correlation in the PCA plot (Figure 3), but have an overall low proportion (less than 1%) of the pollen surface. Potassium is often referred to as the ‘element of quality’ [48,49]. Pollen from hermaphrodite and male flowers is usually normal and fertile; however, the pollination outcome in wild grapevines is usually drastically low compared to cultivated grapevines [50,51]. In barley pollen, the distribution of potassium was different during the developmental stages, with higher levels observed in the pollen wall in the early stages of development, while in later stages, higher levels were observed around the aperture area [52]. It could be that the lower potassium content in two male individuals is due to a shift from the pollen wall to the aperture area, which usually have a different exine construction [11] appearing lower in surface EDX analysis; or to poorer availability and uptake of potassium in these individuals.
Magnesium content was significantly higher in cv. PMC and female individual Pak10 compared to three male individuals, and interestingly, a substantial difference was found between two neighboring individuals (female/high vs. male/low).
Aluminum was found only in cv. PMC, suggesting surface airborne aluminum deposition, i.e., pollution [53], probably related to the use of aluminum-containing pesticides in commercial viticulture, unlike the natural habitat of V. sylvestris, where no spraying is done at all. There is little data on aluminum pollen contamination, such as the one report of high aluminum contamination in bee pollen [54]. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) risk assessment indicates that contamination with aluminum in pollen and bee products is unlikely as it is not systemic and therefore unlikely to be transferred to plant tissue [55].
Interestingly, no zinc was detected on the pollen surface by EDX, although zinc is essential for pollen development and its deficiency can lead to coulure or millerandage in grapevine [3].
EDX analysis has objective limitations, such as low depth resolution, the presence of elements in only a limited scanned area, overlap in X-ray signal, signal loss for some elements, or errors due to sample preparation [14,56]. Sample preparation can lead to alterations such as dehydration of the pollen cytoplasm, which reduces its volume and leads to changes in the shape and size of the pollen wall (harmomegathy) [7,57]. Nevertheless, EDX proved to be very informative for the characterization of V. sylvestris and V. vinifera pollen, providing an insight into the nutritional status of V. vinifera L. pollen grains.

5. Conclusions

The elemental composition of the surface of the pollen grains of V. sylvestris, analyzed by the SEM-EDX method, revealed the presence of eight elements, with five exhibiting significant differences between individuals. The results obtained with this sample set and the statistical analysis do not allow a clear distinction between individuals of V. sylvestris based on their flower type or population of origin. There were no substantial differences in elemental composition between V. sylvestris and V. vinifera; consistent with previous data on the pollen microstructure of V. vinifera L., confirming the functional nature of dimorphism in grapevine pollen. Individual significant changes detected for some elements indicate peculiarities related to the nutritional status of the plant and their habitat. The SEM-EDX has proven useful in this study to gain a deeper insight into the nutritional status and requirements of V. vinifera L. Further microscopic and genetic studies with a larger number of samples would be interesting to understand the role of nutrients, flowering, and yield formation in grapevine in a specific environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants13162338/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.Z. and D.N.; methodology, D.N., G.Z. and K.L.; software, Z.R.-V., L.M., K.L.; validation, G.Z., Z.R.-V. and A.M.; formal analysis, G.Z. and K.L.; investigation, G.Z., K.L., A.M., Z.R.-V., L.M.; resources, G.Z.; data curation, G.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L. and G.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.O.Z.; visualization, Z.R.-V., K.L., L.M.; supervision, D.N.; project administration, G.Z. and D.N.; funding acquisition, G.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Croatian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Energy and the European Regional Development Fund 2020–2023 as part of the project “Assessment of drought tolerance of Croatian grapevine germplasm, TOLVIN” (grant number: KK.05.1.1.02.0010); the Croatian Science Foundation DOK-2021-02-8479 (Career development of young researchers—training of new PhDs), and under the contract for financing scientific research between the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, and the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (No. 451-03-65/2024-03/200116).

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are contained within the article; the original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lebon, G.; Wojnarowiez, G.; Holzapfel, B.; Fontaine, F.; Vaillant-Gaveau, N.; Clément, C. Sugars and flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 2565–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vasconcelos, M.C.; Greven, M.; Winefield, C.S.; Trought, M.C.; Raw, V. The flowering process of Vitis vinifera: A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2009, 60, 411–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kidman, C.M.; Dry, P.R.; McCarthy, M.G.; Collins, C. Effect of rootstock on nutrition, pollination and fertilisation in ‘Shiraz’ (Vitis vinifera L.). Vitis 2014, 53, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alva, O.; Roa-Roco, R.N.; Pérez-Díaz, R.; Yáñez, M.; Tapia, J.; Moreno, Y.; Ruiz-Lara, S.; González, E. Pollen morphology and boron concentration in floral tissues as factors triggering natural and GA-induced parthenocarpic fruit development in grapevine. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Longbottom, M.L.; Dry, P.R.; Sedgley, M. Effects of sodium molybdate foliar sprays on molybdenum concentration in the vegetative and reproductive structures and on yield components of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Longbottom, M.L. The Reproductive Biology of Grapevines: Factors That Affect Flowering and Fruitset. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackmore, S.; Wortley, A.H.; Skvarla, J.J.; Rowley, J.R. Pollen wall development in flowering plants. New Phytol. 2007, 174, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gallardo, A.; Ocete, R.; López, M.A.; Lara, M.; Rivera, D. Assessment of pollen dimorphism in populations of Vitis vinifera L. subsp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi in Spain. Vitis 2009, 48, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mercuri, A.M.; Torri, P.; Florenzano, A.; Clò, E.; Mariotti Lippi, M.; Sgarbi, E.; Bignami, C. Sharing the agrarian knowledge with archaeology: First evidence of the dimorphism of Vitis pollen from the Middle Bronze Age of N Italy (Terramara Santa Rosa di Poviglio). Sustainability 2021, 13, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, J. Pollen wall development: The associated enzymes and metabolic pathways. Plant Biol. 2013, 15, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Halbritter, H.; Ulrich, S.; Grímsson, F.; Weber, M.; Zetter, R.; Hesse, M.; Buchner, R. Illustrated Pollen Terminology, 2nd ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Büyükkartal, H.N.; Çölgeçen, H.; Marasal, B. Development of anther wall throughout microsporogenesis in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Çavus. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2005, 7, 616–620. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abd Mutalib, M.; Rahman, M.A.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ismail, A.F.; Jaafar, J. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. In Membrane Characterization; Hilal, N., Fauzi Ismail, A., Matsuura, T., Oatley-Radcliffe, D., Eds.; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 161–179. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shaban, S.E.; Ibrahiem, N.M.; El-mongy, S.A.; Elshereafy, E.E. Validation of scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and gamma spectrometry to verify source nuclear material for safeguards purposes. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2013, 296, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Clò, E.; Furia, E.; Florenzano, A.; Mercuri, A.M. Flora-vegetation history and land use in Medieval Tuscany: The palynological evidence of a local biodiversity heritage. Quat. Int. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crang, R.E.; May, G. Evidence for silicon as a prevalent elemental component in pollen wall structure. Canad. J. Bot. 1974, 52, 2171–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scimeca, M.; Bischetti, S.; Lamsira, H.K.; Bonfiglio, R.; Bonanno, E. Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis: A powerful tool in biomedical research and diagnosis. Eur. J. Histochem. 2018, 62, 2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bucsek, M.J.; Nyéki, J.; Szabó, Z.; Kádár, A. Quantitation of Mineral Elements of Different Fruit Pollen Grains. In Microbeam and Nanobeam Analysis; Benoit, D., Bresse, J.F., Van’t dack, L., Werner, H., Wernisch, J., Eds.; Mikrochim. Acta Supplement; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 1996; p. 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duque, L.; Guimarães, F.; Ribeiro, H.; Sousa, R.; Abreu, I. Elemental characterization of the airborne pollen surface using Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA). Atmos. Environ. 2013, 75, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Acma, F.M.; Mendez, N.P. Pollen morphology and pollen elemental composition of selected philippine native gingers in tribe Alpinieae (Alpinioideae: Zingiberaceae). Biol. Forum 2018, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rane, P.; Thakre, M.; Verma, M.K.; Kumar, C.; Prakash, J.; Srivastava, V.; Shashank, P.R.; Murukan, N.; Chawla, G.; Kumar Mandal, P.; et al. Studies on pollen micro-morphology, pollen storage method, and cross-compatibility among the grape (Vitis spp.) genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1353808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trouvé, G.; Michelin, L.; Kehrli, D.; Josien, L.; Rigolet, S.; Lebeau, B.; Gieré, R. The multi-analytical characterization of calcium oxalate phytolith crystals from grapevine after treatment with calcination. Crystals 2023, 13, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zdunić, G.; Maul, E.; Eiras Dias, J.E.J.; Munoz Organero, G.; Carka, F.; Maletić, E.; Savvides, S.; Jahnke, G.G.; Nagy, Z.A.; Nikolić, D.; et al. Guiding principles for identification, evaluation and conservation of Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris. Vitis 2017, 56, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lukšić, K.; Zdunić, G.; Mucalo, A.; Marinov, L.; Ranković-Vasić, Z.; Ivanović, J.; Nikolić, D. Microstructure of Croatian wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris Gmel Hegi) pollen grains revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Plants 2022, 11, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Butorac, L.; Hančević, K.; Lukšić, K.; Škvorc, Ž.; Leko, M.; Maul, E.; Zdunić, G. Assessment of wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera ssp. sylvestris) chlorotypes and accompanying woody species in the Eastern Adriatic region. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nikolić, D.; Milatović, D. Pollen morphology of some sweet cherry cultivars observed by scanning electron microscopy. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1139, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nikolić, D.; Milatović, D. Scanning electron microscopy study of pollen morphology of five sour cherry cultivars. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1161, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Radović, A.; Nikolić, D.; Milatović, D.; Djurović, D.; Trajković, J. Investigation of pollen morphological characteristics in some quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) cultivars. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2016, 40, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Husson, F.; Josse, J.; Lê, S.; Mazet, J. FactoMineR: Factor Analysis and Data Mining with R. R Package Version 1.04. 2007. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR (accessed on 23 May 2024).
  30. Kassambara, A.; Mundt, F. Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R Package Version 1.0.7. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra (accessed on 23 May 2024).
  31. Pereira, M.R.; Ribeiro, H.; Cunha, M.; Abreu, I. Comparison of pollen quality in Vitis vinifera L. cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 227, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pedersen, O.; Colmer, T.D.; Sand-Jensen, K. Underwater photosynthesis of submerged plants–recent advances and methods. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sardans, J.; Peñuelas, J. Potassium control of plant functions: Ecological and agricultural implications. Plants 2021, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kinzel, H. Calcium in the vacuoles and cell walls of plant tissue. Flora 1989, 182, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zienkiewicz, K.; Rejón, J.D.; Suárez, C.; Castro, A.J.; de Dios Alché, J.; Rodríguez García, M.I. Whole-Organ analysis of calcium behaviour in the developing pistil of olive (Olea europaea L.) as a tool for the determination of key events in sexual plant reproduction. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Das, D.; Mondal, S.; Mandal, S. Studies on pollen viability and in vitro pollen germination of Nymphoides indica (L.) Kuntz. IJRAR 2018, 5, 461–467. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rogiers, S.Y.; Coetzee, Z.A.; Walker, R.R.; Deloire, A.; Tyerman, S.D. Potassium in the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berry: Transport and function. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zheng, R.H.; Su, S.D.; Xiao, H.; Tian, H.Q. Calcium: A Critical factor in pollen germination and tube elongation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tian, H.Q.; Kuang, A.; Musgrave, M.E.; Russell, S.D. Calcium distribution in fertile and sterile anthers of a photoperiod-sensitive genic male-sterile rice. Planta 1998, 204, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hai-Yan, K.; Gui-Xia, J. Calcium distribution during pollen development of Larix principis-rupprechtii. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2004, 46, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  41. Melcrová, A.; Pokorna, S.; Pullanchery, S.; Kohagen, M.; Jurkiewicz, P.; Hof, M.; Jungwirth, P.; Cremer, P.S.; Cwiklik, L. The complex nature of calcium cation interactions with phospholipid bilayers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wichard, T.; Mishra, B.; Myneni, S.C.; Bellenger, J.P.; Kraepiel, A.M. Storage and bioavailability of molybdenum in soils increased by organic matter complexation. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bittner, F. Molybdenum metabolism in plants and crosstalk to iron. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 76931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rana, M.S.; Bhantana, P.; Imran, M.; Saleem, M.H.; Moussa, M.G.; Khan, Z.; Khan, I.; Alam, M.; Abbas, M.; Binyamin, R.; et al. Molybdenum potential vital role in plants metabolism for optimizing the growth and development. Ann. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. 2020, 4, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Redlich, C.; Quadbeck, P.; Thieme, M.; Kieback, B. Molybdenum–A biodegradable implant material for structural applications? Acta Biomater. 2020, 104, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schauer, A.; Redlich, C.; Scheibler, J.; Poehle, G.; Barthel, P.; Maennel, A.; Adams, V.; Weissgaerber, T.; Linke, A.; Quadbeck, P. Biocompatibility and degradation behavior of molybdenum in an in vivo rat model. Materials 2021, 14, 7776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fernandes, C.; Taurino, I. Biodegradable molybdenum (mo) and tungsten (w) devices: One step closer towards fully-transient biomedical implants. Sensors 2022, 22, 3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Usherwood, N.R. The role of potassium in crop quality. In Potassium in Agriculture, 1st ed.; Munson, R.D., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1985; pp. 489–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cuq, S.; Lemetter, V.; Kleiber, D.; Levasseur-Garcia, C. Assessing macro-(P, K, Ca, Mg) and micronutrient (Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, B) concentration in vine leaves and grape berries of Vitis vinifera by using near-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Benito, A.; Muñoz-Organero, G.; De Andrés, M.T.; Ocete, R.; García-Muñoz, S.; López, M.Á.; Arroyo-García, R.; Cabello, F. Ex situ ampelographical characterisation of wild Vitis vinifera from fifty-one Spanish populations. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 23, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marrano, A.; Micheletti, D.; Lorenzi, S.; Neale, D.; Grando, M.S. Genomic signatures of different adaptations to environmental stimuli between wild and cultivated Vitis vinifera L. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rehman, S.; Yun, S.J. Developmental regulation of K accumulation in pollen, anthers, and papillae: Are anther dehiscence, papillae hydration, and pollen swelling leading to pollination and fertilization in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) regulated by changes in K concentration? J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1315–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Vasilevskaya, N. Pollution of the environment and pollen: A Review. Stresses 2022, 2, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Exley, C.; Rotheray, E.; Goulson, D. Bumblebee pupae contain high levels of aluminium. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. EFSA. Alvarez, F.; Arena, M.; Auteri, D.; Binaglia, M.; Castoldi, A.F.; Chiusolo, A.; Colagiorgi, A.; Colas, M.; Crivellente, F.; et al. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance aluminium ammonium sulfate. EFSA 2022, 20, e07319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Baldi, B.G.; Franceschi, V.R.; Loewus, F.A. Localization of phosphorus and cation reserves in Lilium longiflorum pollen. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 1018–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Katifori, E.; Alben, S.; Cerda, E.; Nelson, D.R.; Dumais, J. Foldable structures and the natural design of pollen grains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 7635–7639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two natural populations, NP Paklenica (A,B) and Imotski Blue Lake (C,D), represent the main growth and habitat differences of Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris along the eastern Adriatic coast in the northern Mediterranean region.
Figure 1. Two natural populations, NP Paklenica (A,B) and Imotski Blue Lake (C,D), represent the main growth and habitat differences of Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris along the eastern Adriatic coast in the northern Mediterranean region.
Plants 13 02338 g001
Figure 2. SEM-EDX analysis of the elemental composition of pollen grains from ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris two female (A,B), eight male (CJ) and one cultivated Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ (K).
Figure 2. SEM-EDX analysis of the elemental composition of pollen grains from ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris two female (A,B), eight male (CJ) and one cultivated Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ (K).
Plants 13 02338 g002aPlants 13 02338 g002bPlants 13 02338 g002c
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris and one Vitis vinifera cv. PMC, based on the SEM-EDX elemental composition of the pollen surface. The grouping in the PCA plot based on seven elements: Carbon (C), Oxygen (O), Magnesium (Mg), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca) and Molybdenum (Mo) in two female (Pak10 and Pak12) and eight male Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris individuals (Pak11, Pak13, Pak19, Pak21, Pak32, Im11, Im18 and Im19) and one Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ (PMC).
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris and one Vitis vinifera cv. PMC, based on the SEM-EDX elemental composition of the pollen surface. The grouping in the PCA plot based on seven elements: Carbon (C), Oxygen (O), Magnesium (Mg), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca) and Molybdenum (Mo) in two female (Pak10 and Pak12) and eight male Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris individuals (Pak11, Pak13, Pak19, Pak21, Pak32, Im11, Im18 and Im19) and one Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ (PMC).
Plants 13 02338 g003
Table 1. The elemental surface composition of pollen grains of ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris genotypes from two natural populations (Paklenica and Imotski): two female (F), eight male (M) individuals, and one hermaphrodite (H) Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ from the IAC collection, analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX).
Table 1. The elemental surface composition of pollen grains of ten Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris genotypes from two natural populations (Paklenica and Imotski): two female (F), eight male (M) individuals, and one hermaphrodite (H) Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Plavac mali crni’ from the IAC collection, analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX).
GenotypeFlowerCarbonOxygenMagnesiumPhosphorusPotassium Calcium Molybdenum Aluminum
Pak10F71.67 ± 3.23 ab20.76 ± 5.350.38 ± 0.02 a1.30 ± 0.180.96 ± 0.25 ab1.08 ± 0.31 bc3.85 ± 1.51 and
Pak12F73.58 ± 3.91 ab19.96 ± 5.270.31 ± 0.06 abc1.39 ± 0.430.97 ± 0.36 ab1.01 ± 0.15 abc2.78 ± 0.49 abnd
Pak11M77.05 ± 1.85 ab16.93 ± 2.470.17 ± 0.03 d1.05 ± 0.140.77 ± 0.13a0.99 ± 0.05 abc3.04 ± 0.40 abnd
Pak13M76.49 ± 2.44 ab18.43 ± 3.680.28 ± 0.04 abcd0.89 ± 0.280.89 ± 0.24 ab0.58 ± 0.17 a 2.43 ± 0.58 abnd
Pak19M75.45 ± 1.75 ab17.79 ± 3.130.34 ± 0.04 ab1.00 ± 0.221.05 ± 0.25 ab0.74 ± 0.09 ab3.64 ± 0.80 abnd
Pak21M77.29 ± 0.39 ab15.57 ± 1.390.36 ± 0.07 ab1.28 ± 0.410.92 ± 0.22 ab0.66 ± 0.13 ab3.92 ± 0.93 and
Pak32M75.51 ± 3.64 ab18.42 ± 4.180.25 ± 0.04 bcd1.13 ± 0.100.92 ± 0.13 ab0.83 ± 0.12 abc2.94 ± 0.20 abnd
Im11M77.82 ± 0.69 a15.79 ± 1.190.33 ± 0.07 ab1.15 ± 0.111.04 ± 0.14 ab1.03 ± 0.06 abc2.83 ± 0.35 abnd
Im18M77.63 ± 2.40 a18.20 ± 2.260.19 ± 0.01 cd0.72 ± 0.070.56 ± 0.04 a0.82 ± 0.03 abc1.89 ± 0.18 bnd
Im19M70.57 ± 2.17 b22.07 ± 2.330.30 ± 0.04 abc1.33 ± 0.330.89 ± 0.23 ab1.29 ± 0.28 c3.55 ± 0.44 abnd
cv. PMCH75.72 ± 1.03 ab17.87 ± 1.630.40 ± 0.04 a1.25 ± 0.131.53 ± 0.25 b0.90 ± 0.20 abc2.08 ± 0.10 ab0.26 ± 0.13
Mean values (%) with ± St.Dev, and post hoc HSD Tukey test (lower case for significant differences at p ≤ 0.05); nd—not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lukšić, K.; Mucalo, A.; Marinov, L.; Ozretić Zoković, M.; Ranković-Vasić, Z.; Nikolić, D.; Zdunić, G. X-ray Microanalysis of Elemental Composition of Vitis sylvestris Pollen Grains. Plants 2024, 13, 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162338

AMA Style

Lukšić K, Mucalo A, Marinov L, Ozretić Zoković M, Ranković-Vasić Z, Nikolić D, Zdunić G. X-ray Microanalysis of Elemental Composition of Vitis sylvestris Pollen Grains. Plants. 2024; 13(16):2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lukšić, Katarina, Ana Mucalo, Luka Marinov, Maja Ozretić Zoković, Zorica Ranković-Vasić, Dragan Nikolić, and Goran Zdunić. 2024. "X-ray Microanalysis of Elemental Composition of Vitis sylvestris Pollen Grains" Plants 13, no. 16: 2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13162338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop