Next Article in Journal
Potential of a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System with Multispectral and Thermal Sensors to Monitor Vineyard Characteristics for Precision Viticulture
Previous Article in Journal
Field Investigation of Wave Attenuation in a Mangrove Forest Dominated by Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Viern.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Roles of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Rice–Pathogen Interactions

1
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2
Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
3
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2025, 14(1), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010136
Submission received: 8 October 2024 / Revised: 11 December 2024 / Accepted: 18 December 2024 / Published: 6 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)

Abstract

:
Rice is exposed to attacks by the three most destructive pathogens, Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae), Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), and Rhizoctonia solani (R. solani), which cause substantial yield losses and severely threaten food security. To cope with pathogenic infections, rice has evolved diverse molecular mechanisms to respond to a wide range of pathogens. Among these strategies, plant microRNAs (miRNAs), endogenous single-stranded short non-coding RNA molecules, have emerged as promising candidates in coordinating plant–pathogen interactions. MiRNAs can modulate target gene expression at the post-transcriptional level through mRNA cleavage and/or translational inhibition. In rare instances, they also influence gene expression at the transcriptional level through DNA methylation. In recent years, substantial advancements have been achieved in the investigation of microRNA-mediated molecular mechanisms in rice immunity. Therefore, we attempt to summarize the current advances of immune signaling mechanisms in rice–pathogen interactions that are regulated by osa-miRNAs, including their functions and molecular mechanisms. We also focus on recent findings concerning the role of osa-miRNAs that respond to M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani, respectively. These insights enhance our understanding of how the mechanisms of osa-miRNAs mediate rice immunity and may facilitate the development of improved strategies for breeding pathogen-resistant rice varieties.

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous, single-stranded, and small non-coding RNA molecules consisting of 21 to 24 nucleotides (nt). These molecules are distributed across the genomes of animals, plants, and microorganisms, where they interact with partially complementary sequences in target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) [1,2]. Plant miRNAs can post-transcriptionally regulate target gene expression through mRNA cleavage and/or translational inhibition [3]. In addition to these canonical miRNAs, a class of 24 nt miRNAs, referred to as long miRNAs (lmiRNAs), has been identified in rice, which directs DNA methylation to target genes to transcriptionally regulate their expression [4,5]. Over the past few years, numerous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs play broad roles in almost all various processes related to growth, development, and immunity in plants [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The biogenesis of plant miRNAs involves a series of transcription, processing, and modification processes [12]. Specifically, miRNA genes (MIRs) are transcribed into primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) with hundreds of nt by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Then, the pri-miRNAs are processed sequentially into precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) and short miRNA/miRNA* duplexes by the RNase III family enzyme Dicer-like1 (DCL1), a homolog of Dicer, within the nucleus. Although most miRNAs are 21 nt in length [13,14], the 22 nt isoforms of miRNAs are often produced due to the alternative or imprecise processing of pri-miRNAs by DCL1 [15]. In addition to DCL1, DCL3 can also process pri-miRNAs, resulting in the production of a class of 24 nt-long miRNAs in rice [3,4]. Subsequently, the 3’ end of the miRNA/miRNA* duplex are methylated by HUA ENHANCER 1 (HEN1) methyltransferase and are subsequently transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm with the assistance of HASTY (HST) transporters [16]. The degradation of miRNA* strands leads to the maturation of miRNAs, which include 21 nt and 24 nt variants. These miRNAs are subsequently incorporated into the cytosolic ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1) and AGO4 proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [17]. The miRNA-AGO1 RISC mediates sequence-complementary transcript cleavage or translational repression, whereas the miRNA-AGO4 miRISC mediates target site methylation [4,18]. In addition to miRNAs, plants also contain a significant class of small RNA types known as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Predominantly, these endogenous siRNAs originate from the genomic repetitive sequences and intergenic regions of transposable elements (TEs), with a characteristic length of 24 nt [19]. The biogenesis of siRNAs involves their generation from perfectly complementary, long, double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) and subsequent processing by DCL3. These siRNAs play a crucial role in determining the specificity of the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway [20].
Rice (Oryzae sativa L.) is one of the most momentous food crops in the world, providing approximately 21% of calories needed in humans’ daily diets [21]. Ensuring the safety of rice production has become a critical priority for human survival. Nevertheless, rice is susceptible to various survival challenges posed by pathogens from external environments, including fungi, bacteria, and viruses, throughout its lifecycle [22]. The three most destructive rice diseases are rice blast, bacterial blight (BB), and sheath blight, which are caused by the hemibiotrophic fungus Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae), the hemibiotrophic Gram-negative bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), and the necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia solani (R. solani), respectively [23,24,25]. These diseases result in severe yield losses, with annual losses attributed to pests and diseases worldwide reaching up to 30% of total rice yield [26,27], which has a severe impact on rice production and threatens human food security.
The breeding of disease-resistant varieties is the most cost-effective, eco-friendly strategy for crop disease prevention and control in agriculture. This strategy mitigates the risks associated with serious environmental pollution and food safety arising from the extensive use of chemical pesticides, as well as the challenges posed by pesticide resistance in pathogens. The successful implementation of this strategy is contingent upon the identification and cloning of resistant (R) genes, as well as the elucidation of mechanisms underlying resistance [28,29,30]. As one of the most widely studied crops, more than 50 R genes conferring resistance to multiple types of pathogens have been functionally identified in rice [29,31]. However, it is noteworthy that most of the identified resistance genes exhibit narrow resistance spectra, challenges in breeding, the loss of resistance over time, and high associated costs, which limits the repertoire of genes utilized in the genetic improvement of rice. Consequently, the discovery of genetic modulators that enable precise and targeted regulation, along with an understanding of the immune regulatory mechanisms in rice, is essential for the advancement of breeding strategies aimed at enhancing disease resistance [32,33]. Recent studies have uncovered a previously unrecognized layer of gene expression regulation exerted by osa-miRNAs, particularly concerning the regulation of disease-resistant genes.
Over the past few years, numerous studies have demonstrated that osa-miRNAs play broad roles in various intracellular processes related to plant growth and development, as well as in responses to abiotic and biotic stresses [6,8,34,35]. Several recent reviews have addressed the biogenesis, functions, and immune responses of osa-miRNAs in rice for readers seeking more comprehensive information [3,6,36,37,38,39]. This review aims to summarize the functional characterization and molecular mechanisms of osa-miRNAs, which act in response to M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani (Figure 1 and Figure 2, Table 1).

2. Functionally Characterized Osa-miRNAs Associated with the Immune Response Against M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani

Emerging evidence from a variety of experimental systems and methodologies indicates that osa-miRNA-mediated regulatory mechanisms are critical in defense-related responses to M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani. However, the complex and diverse regulatory properties of osa-miRNA present significant challenges in elucidating their roles in rice disease resistance. Researchers have demonstrated that a single mature miRNA can be transcribed from one or more MIR loci, while distinct loci may exhibit variability. Furthermore, one mature miRNA can inhibit the expression of one or several target genes, with the degree of inhibition potentially differing among various targets. Additionally, a single target gene may be regulated by multiple miRNAs [39]. The primary challenge lies in the identification of authentic targets in rice that contribute to osa-miRNA-mediated resistant or susceptible phenotypes. Plant miRNAs primarily regulate the expression of target genes through mechanisms such as mRNA cleavage, translational inhibition, or DNA methylation. Initially, targets can be predicted based on sequence complementarity using online resources such as psRNATarget [75] or psRobot [76]. For mRNA cleavage, targets can be relatively easily predicted and experimentally validated through the degradome sequencing and/or RNA ligase-mediated 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-5′-RACE) [18,77]. In the case of translational inhibition, target genes can be confirmed using a reporter assay that fuses the predicted target site to a fluorescent protein [40]. For DNA methylation, target genes can be identified through bisulfite sequencing analysis [4]. Ultimately, the authenticity of target genes can be further validated through multiple omics analyses, which involve comparing the expression patterns of osa-miRNAs in transgenic lines that overexpress osa-miRNAs and their target mimics, as well as employing the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of osa-miRNA loci and osa-miRNA-binding sites [78,79,80]. The critical question remains whether the identified authentic target genes contribute to the phenotypes mediated by osa-miRNAs. While the regulatory effects of most target genes of miRNAs in response to M. oryzae and Xoo have been confirmed, the identification of target genes responsive to R. solani is still an area requiring further investigation (Table 1) [39,81].
Similarly to Arabidopsis, rice possesses a two-tiered innate immune system to defend against M. oryzae, including pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) [82]. These two immune responses are mediated by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat R proteins, respectively [83,84]. In the interactions between rice and M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani, osa-miRNAs are implicated in both PTI and ETI responses. These responses encompass various processes, including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose deposition, the reprogramming of defense-related genes, alterations in plant hormone biosynthesis and signaling, and variations in DNA methylation (Figure 1).
Numerous osa-miRNAs are known to target transcription factors, thereby regulating the transcription of defense-related genes in rice. Specifically, osa-miR167d, osa-miR169, osa-miR171b, osa-miR319b, and osa-miR535 each target distinct transcription factors, including OsARF12, OsNF-YA, OsSCL6-IIa/b/c, TEOSINTE BRANCHED/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR21 (OsTCP21), and OsSPL4, to modulate rice immunity against M. oryzae either negatively or positively [40,41,42,43,44]. Furthermore, osa-miR160a and osa-miR164a inhibit their respective target transcription factors, OsNAC60 and OsARF8, which subsequently leads to increased ROS production, callose accumulation, and the expression of defense-related genes, thereby enhancing rice immunity [45,47]. Additionally, osa-miR156, osa-miR156/529, and osa-miR169o negatively regulate rice resistance to bacterial blight by targeting OsSPL7/14/17 and OsNF-YA1/4, respectively [65,66,67].
Certain osa-miRNAs are involved in the induction of OsPR gene expression, a phenomenon observed in resistant rice cultivars. Specifically, osa-miR156, osa-miR169o, osa-miR535, and osa-miR7695 target distinct genes, including OsSPL7/14, NF-YA1/4, OsSPL4, and the iron transporter gene OsNramp6. This targeting subsequently enhances the expression levels of defense-related genes, which encompass OsPR genes, OsWRKY45, and genes involved in diterpenoid biosynthesis [44,46,48,50,65,67].
Several osa-miRNAs mediate rice disease resistance by modulating the biosynthesis and signaling pathways of various plant hormones, including indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), ethylene (Et), jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA). This modulation enables rice to adapt dynamically and flexibly to a range of environmental conditions. Specifically, osa-miR166k-166h has been shown to positively regulate rice immunity against the blast fungus by suppressing OsEIN2, which in turn influences Et signaling [53]. Conversely, the overexpression of osa-miR319b results in the increased susceptibility of rice to blast disease by targeting OsTCP21, thereby promoting the expression of OsLOX2, OsLOX5, OsCOI1, and OsCOI2, which are key enzymes involved in JA biosynthesis [43,85]. Additionally, osa-miR396 and osa-miR535 negatively regulate resistance to rice blast disease by suppressing multiple OsGRFs and OsSPL4, which affects IAA homeostasis [44,54]. Furthermore, osa-miR156/529 negatively impacts rice resistance to Xoo by targeting OsSPL7, OsSPL14, and OsSPL17, which activate the transcription of OsAOS2 and OsNPR1, leading to a reduction in JA content and compromised SA signaling [66].
The genes that are key components involved in the biosynthetic pathways of osa-miRNAs also play a significant role in modulating the immune response in rice. In particular, the silencing of OsDCL1, which is essential for the formation of mature osa-miRNAs, has been shown to enhance resistance to M. oryzae infection. This response parallels the effects observed with the overexpression of osa-miR162a [55]. Furthermore, osa-miR168 targets OsAGO1, a principal component of the RNA-induced silencing complex, and regulates the expression of osa-miR1320 and osa-miR164, thereby augmenting immunity against the blast fungus [56]. Additionally, OsAGO2, a core component of the RISC, interacts with 24 nt osa-miR1875 and binds to the promoter region of OsHXK1, which further enhances immunity against rice blast disease [57]
Several osa-miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating rice immunity through the mechanism of DNA methylation, which modulates the expression of target genes. Specifically, the DNA methylation of the OsACO3, OsCIPK10, and OsLRR genes, as well as the MIR812w locus, is influenced by osa-miR812W, thereby impacting immunity to rice blast disease [58]. Previous research has demonstrated that osa-miR1873 directly induces cytosine DNA methylation in LOC_Os05g01790 and regulates its expression [4]. Further studies have indicated that osa-miR1873 fine-tunes rice immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae and influences yield traits through LOC_Os05g01790 [59]. Furthermore, the OsAGO2/osa-miR1875 module directly interacts with the chromatin of OsHXK1, leading to the silencing of OsHXK1 expression via DNA methylation, which in turn regulates rice immunity against M. oryzae [57]. Additionally, the resistance of OsNBS8R to bacterial blight is modulated by osa-miR1876 through DNA methylation, particularly in CHG sites, according to Jiang et al., 2020 [68].

3. Identification of Osa-miRNAs Involved in Response to M. oryzae in Rice

Rice blast, caused by the fungal pathogen M. oryzae, is a geographically widespread and devastating disease that seriously affects both the yield and quality of rice [86]. Understanding and analyzing the resistance mechanisms associated with this disease can enhance disease prevention and control strategies, and numerous breakthroughs have been achieved in recent decades. To date, more than 100 rice blast R genes have been identified within the rice genome, of which 30 genes, encoded by nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat (NLR) family receptors, have been functionally characterized [87,88,89]. Additionally, at least 11 avirulence effectors from M. oryzae have been identified [90]. Previous studies have shown that a large proportion of osa-miRNAs regulate the progression of M. oryzae infection and/or the response to the M. oryzae elicitor in rice plants [37,39,46,51,91,92,93]. These osa-miRNAs are predicted to regulate multiple signaling pathways by targeting a series of genes, including those involved in the biogenesis of small RNAs and defense pathways, as well as IAA, SA, JA, ET signaling, and ROS signaling [37,43,47,49,57]. In addition, they can also target some genes containing upstream open reading frames (ORF) to regulate these signaling pathways [44]. The identification of these osa-miRNAs opens up new avenues to explore the regulatory mechanisms underlying rice immunity against M. oryzae.

3.1. The Osa-miRNAs That Play Positive Roles in Rice Immunity Against M. oryzae

In previous studies, at least eight osa-miRNAs have been reported to act as positive regulators in the interaction between rice and M. oryzae by suppressing their respective target genes, including osa-miR7695 [50,51,52], osa-miR160a [45,46], osa-miR166h-166k [53], osa-miR398b [46,49], osa-miR162a [55], osa-miR159a [60], osa-miR812w [58], and osa-miR171b [42].
Osa-miR159 is a conserved osa-miRNA that generates five mature isoforms, namely osa-miR159a/b/c/d/e/f. This osa-miRNA has been revealed to mediate the cleavage of mRNA for three target genes, OsGAMYB, OsGAMYBL, and OsZF [94,95]. Several studies have shown the important role of miR159 in the immune responses of various plant species, such as cotton [96], lily [97], tomato [98], and apple [99]. Notably, overexpressing osa-miR159a in transgenic plants alleviated rice’s susceptibility to M. oryzae infection. In contrast, transgenic plants expressing a short-tandem target mimic (STTM) to block osa-miR159a showed susceptibility. Meanwhile, rice plants with knockout mutations of the three target genes, OsGAMYB, OsGAMYBL and OsZF, enhanced resistance to M. oryzae. In addition, alterations in the expression of osa-miR159a were also found to affect yield traits, including pollen and grain development [60].
The osa-miR812 family consists of 22 (osa-miR812a-v) members in the rice genome. Notably, osa-miR812w, a new member that was previously named as miR-75 [51], has been reported to be involved in rice blast resistance [58]. osa-miR812w is present in multiple Oryza cultivar species, including the japonica and indica subspecies, as well as in wild rice species osa-miRNAs [58]. However, it is absent in other monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant species [58]. Simultaneously, 24 nucleotide-derived osa-miR812w-3p species, processed by DCL3, have been shown to associate with AGO4 [4]. Furthermore, overexpressing osa-miR812w in transgenic plants increases resistance against infection due to the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is attributed to the accumulation of higher levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In contrast, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated osa-miR812w editing in plants enhances disease susceptibility, characterized by reduced H2O2 levels. This process may be mediated through the expressed regulation of three target genes, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase3 (ACO3), calcineurin B-like (CBL)-interacting serine–threonine protein kinase (CIPK10), and leucine repeat-containing protein (LRR) expression, and potentially through DNA methylation [58].
A previous study demonstrated that the accumulation of osa-miR171b contributed to disease resistance against rice stripe virus (RSV) infection by modulating disease symptoms [100]. This finding suggested that miR171b functions as a regulator of plant resistance. The transgenic plants overexpressing osa-miR171b displayed a marked increase in resistance to rice blast, a slight reduction in grain yield, and a delay in flowering. This was attributed to the inhibition of three SCARECROW-Like (SCL) target genes: OsSCL6-IIa, OsSCL6-IIb, and OsSCL6-IIc, which may interact with DELLAs to disrupt the DELLA-JAZ association and JA responses [42,101,102,103,104]. Meanwhile, the osa-miR171b-OsSCL6-IIs module exhibited dynamic expression throughout the rice growth stages [42]. During the vegetative stage, osa-miR171b was up-regulated to suppress the expression of OsSCL6-IIs, which improved the disease resistance. Conversely, osa-miR171b was down-regulated during the reproductive stage while OsSCL6-IIs was up-regulated, facilitating normal development and the flowering of panicles [42].

3.2. The Osa-miRNAs That Facilitate M. oryzae Attack in Rice

Currently, at least 13 osa-miRNAs have been found to facilitate M. oryzae attack in rice, including osa-miR156 [48], osa-miR164a [47], osa-miR167d [41], osa-miR168 [56], osa-miR169 [40], osa-miR1871 [61], osa-miR1873 [59], osa-miR1875 [57], osa-miR319 [43], osa-miR396 [54], osa-miR439 [62], osa-miR530 [63], osa-miR535 [44], and osa-miR1432 [64].
Osa-miR1871 is a rice-specific 24 nucleotide osa-miRNA that responds to both abiotic and biotic stresses [46,105]. Transgenic plants with overexpressed osa-miR1871 demonstrated compromised resistance to blast disease and a reduction in grain yield. In contrast, the inhibition of osa-miR1871 via a target mimic (MIM1871) resulted in enhanced immunity and yield when compared to the Nipponbare control [61]. In addition, blocking osa-miR1871 led to a constitutive increase in the expression of genes associated with chitin responsiveness, thereby priming PTI responses [61]. The microfibrillar-associated protein (MFAP1), a growth-related marker gene in the fungus Cenangium ferruginosum [106], is the target gene of osa-miR1871 in rice [61]. Notably, MFAP1 is located near the cell wall and is found to positively regulate PTI responses with higher ROS levels and more callose deposits [61]. The phenotypic characteristics of the MFAP1 mutants were similar to those of the transgenic plants overexpressing osa-miR1871. Conversely, transgenic lines overexpressing MFAP1 or both MFAP1 and osa-miR1871 exhibited comparable resistance to MIM1871 [61]. Furthermore, time-course experimental data indicated that the expression levels of osa-miR1871 and MFAP1 in rice leaves, panicles, and basal internodes exhibited dynamic changes throughout the entire growth period, thereby playing a crucial role in the regulation of immune responses and yield traits [61].
Mature sequences of osa-miR535 exhibit a high similarity to osa-miR156 and osa-miR529, despite their derivation from distinct MIR genes [107]. These osa-miRNAs target the same transcription factor gene family, specifically the SQUAMOSA (SQUA) promoter-binding-like (SPL) family, which comprises 19 members in rice and plays a crucial role for the regulation of plant growth and immunity [48,107,108,109,110,111,112]. Osa-miR156 has been verified as a negative regulator of rice immunity against M. oryzae infection [48]. Transgenic plants with overexpressed osa-miR156 enhance their susceptibility to blast disease, whereas blocking osa-miR156fhl-3p via a target mimic of osa-miR156 (MIM156) confers higher resistance to M. oryzae [48]. Furthermore, osa-miR156 can specifically combine with the OsSPL14 gene, which has been reported to enhance rice resistance against M. oryzae and inhibit the expression of OsSPL14 and WRKY45, thereby compromising blast resistance [48,113]. Concurrently, osa-miR535 targets another SPL gene, OsSPL4, to negatively regulate rice immune responses to M. oryzae infection. Consistently, transgenic rice lines overexpressing OsSPL4 increase blast disease resistance and delay M. oryzae infection [44]. OsSPL4 also binds to the promoter of GH3.2, an indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase, which affects IAA homeostasis and promotes its expression. This disruption of IAA homeostasis results in a decrease in free IAA levels, ultimately causing the suppression of the IAA signaling pathway and enhancing rice blast resistance [44].
ARGONAUTE proteins (AGOs) are essential components of RISCs and are involved in the regulation of sRNA to regulate rice immune responses [56,57,114,115,116]. Previous research has illustrated that OsAGO2 can improve rice’s sensitivity to rice black-streaked dwarf virus infection via controlling the DNA methylation of HEXOKINASE1 (OsHXK1) [116]. HXK1 can transmit glucose signals as a glucose sensor [117] and regulate plant immunity to pathogens by mediating ROS, anthocyanin accumulation, and stomatal closure [116,118,119,120,121]. OsAGO2 can also negatively regulate resistance to blast disease by binding to 24 nucleotide osa-miR1875, which mediates DNA methylation and leads to the silencing of OsHXK1 [57]. Conversely, OsHXK1 acts as a positive regulator of resistance to blast disease, likely through its role as a glucose sensor, which induces the expression of defense-related genes and promotes the accumulation of ROS [57].
Additionally, osa-miR160a [45,46], osa-miR162 [55], osa-miR168 [56], osa-miR171b [42], osa-miR1871 [61], osa-miR1873 [59], osa-miR396 [54], osa-miR530 [63], and osa-miR1432 [64] have been shown to balance rice growth, development, and defense against M. oryzae. This balance is essential for practical applications aimed at enhancing rice immunity and yield.

4. Identification of RiceOsa-miRNAs Responsive to Xoo

Rice bacterial blight (BB) is one of the most deadly bacterial diseases, resulting in yield losses of 20–30%. It is primarily caused by the Gram-negative proteobacterium Xoo [122,123] and serves as an exemplary pathosystem for characterizing the interactions between plant hosts and bacterial pathogens [124].
Previous studies have identified at least 16 protein-coding genes that confer either dominant or recessive resistance to Xoo in rice [125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141]. The utilization of rice germplasm resources that harbor these resistance genes represents a highly effective, economical, and environmentally sustainable strategy for the prevention and control of plant diseases in agricultural settings [33]. However, the effectiveness of this approach is often compromised by the loss of resistance and the emergence of new virulent pathogen populations over time [142,143,144,145,146,147]. An alternative strategy involves the reprogramming of the expression patterns of TALE-triggered susceptibility genes, which can be achieved through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [148,149] and Cas9-mediated gene editing techniques [150,151,152,153,154]. In addition to the GWAS and TALE-dependent resistance gene mining methods, the exploration of miRNA-targeted genes may offer a promising avenue for the discovery of resistance-associated genes.
Although certain osa-miRNAs have been characterized for their role in regulating disease resistance, the specific functions of miRNAs in the interaction between rice and Xoo remain relatively unknown. A number of osa-miRNAs and their corresponding target genes that respond to Xoo have been identified through the analysis of dynamic expression level changes in the various rice varieties using small RNA sequencing, transcriptome analysis, and degradome sequencing [69,155,156,157].

4.1. The Osa-miRNAs That Play Positive Roles in Rice Immunity Against Xoo

To date, at least four osa-miRNAs have been proposed to positively regulate the interaction between rice and Xoo by suppressing their target genes, including osa-miR159b [69], osa-miR1432 [70], osa-miR160a [45], and osa-miR395 [71].
Osa-miR395 is a differentially expressed osa-miRNA that is activated following inoculation with Xoo, distinguishing the rice susceptible line Mudanjiang 8 (MDJ8) from the resistant line Rb49, which harbors the major disease resistance gene Xa3/Xa26 [156].
Osa-miR395 currently comprises 25 members within the rice genome, which generally demonstrate high expression levels and conservation across species [158]. It enhances resistance against two destructive bacterial pathogens, Xoo and X. oryzae pv. Oryzicola (Xoc), by modulating PTI responses and R (Xa3/Xa26 and Xa23) gene-mediated resistance [71]. Utilizing the psRNATarget and WMD3 bioinformatics tools, OsAPS1, which functions in sulfate assimilation, along with two sulfate transporter genes, OsSULTR2;1 and OsSULTR2;2, known for their sulfate transport activity that facilitates sulfate accumulation, have been predicted as targets of osa-miR395 [159,160].
Moreover, osa-miR395 can disrupt sulfate translocation in the rice xylem by inhibiting the expression of OsAPS1, OsSULTR2;1, and OsSULTR2;2 [71]. The regulation of sulfate accumulation by osa-miR395, rather than S-metabolites, impairs the virulence of Xoo and Xoc, consequently preventing their proliferation and resulting in broad-spectrum resistance to both pathogens [71].

4.2. The Osa-miRNAs That Facilitate Xoo Attack in Rice

Currently, a minimum of seven osa-miRNAs have been identified as facilitating the attack of Xoo in rice, including osa-miR169o [67], osa-miR156 [65], osa-miR164a [69], osa-miR167d [69], osa-miR1876 [68], osa-miR2118 [72], and osa-miRNA156/529 [66].
Osa-miR169 is a highly conserved osa-miRNA in Oryza sativa, encoded by 18 family members, which include osa-miR169a through to osa-miR169r (http://www.mirbase.org/). Several of these members have been shown to be regulated in response to abiotic stresses in various plant species, such as Arabidopsis, maize, and soybean, under drought stress [161], N deficiency [162], low temperatures [163] and salt tolerance [164]. Furthermore, the target of osa-miR169, which encodes subunit A of the nuclear factor Y (NF-YA), also responds to abiotic stresses in rice [165,166,167,168,169]. Recent studies have indicated that 10 subunits of osa-miR169, specifically osa-miR169o/n and osa-miR169f.1/g/h/i/j/k/l/m, are down-regulated under Xoo inoculation, nitrogen-limiting stress, and combined stress in rice [67]. Eight of the eleven NF-YA genes have been identified as the authentic targets of osa-miR169, including from NF-YA1 to NF-YA6, as well as NF-YA10 and NF-YA11 [18,40,170,171,172]. The overexpression of osa-miR169o in transgenic plants has been shown to weaken rice immunity to Xoo infection, N limitation stress, and combined stress by suppressing the expression of NF-YA1 and NF-YA4 [67]. Consistently, the transient expression of NF-YA4, NF-YA10, and NF-YA11 in rice protoplasts result in a significant up-regulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and NRT2 genes, while slightly reducing the transcriptional activity of genes in the NRT1 family [67].
Osa-miR156 is a highly expressed and conserved osa-miRNA in the rice genome, comprising 12 distinct members. This osa-miRNA targets 11 SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) genes in rice, which are involved in regulating significant agronomic traits [108]. SPL14, also known as ideal plant architecture 1 (IPA1), can enhance rice immunity through a phosphorylated process that alters its DNA binding specificity and activates the expression of OsWRKY45 in response to blast inoculation [113]. Additionally, osa-miR156 negatively regulates resistance against Xoo based on the physical interaction between target genes (IPA1 and OsSPL7) and the DELLA protein SLENDER RICE 1 (SLR1). This process enhances the stability of SLR1 to reduce gibberellin acid (GA)-mediated susceptibility to Xoo [65]. Further investigations reveal that Xoo infection simultaneously activates the transcription of miR156 and miR529 while suppressing the expression of three target genes, OsSPL7, OsSPL14, and OsSPL17 [66]. The proteins OsSPL7, OsSPL14, and OsSPL17 directly bind to the promoter regions of their downstream target genes, rice allene oxide synthase 2 (OsAOS2) and NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES1 (OsNPR1), thereby activating their expression. This regulatory mechanism influences JA accumulation and the SA signaling pathway, facilitating Xoo infection [66]. Non-TAL effector XopQ-inducible osa-miR1876 was initially identified as a regulator of the OsNBS8R gene through DNA methylation, which encodes an NB-ARC protein and confers quantitative resistance to Xoo [68]. The binding site of osa-miR1876 is located in the 5′UTR of OsNBS8R, inserted randomly, and has evolved alongside osa-miR1876. The interaction between OsNBS8R and XOPQ-induced osa-miR1876 partially aligns with the zigzag model, suggesting that OsNBS8R may also adhere to this framework to regulate innate immune responses or basal disease resistance aganist Xoo [68].
In addition, osa-miR156 [65] and osa-miR169o [67] have been reported to improve yield, nitrogen use’s efficiency, and disease resistance to Xoo, respectively. This could establish a new strategy for achieving both high disease resistance and high yield for rice breeding.

5. Identification of Rice Osa-miRNAs Responsive to R. solani

Rice sheath blight (RSB) is a major fungal disease caused by the soil-borne necrotrophic fungus R. solani AG1-IA, which leads to substantial yield losses and a decline in grain quality [23,173,174]. Resistance to RSB is a highly complex quantitative trait characterized by dynamic and diverse responses that are regulated by multiple genes [175]. The dominant resistance genes or loci associated with RSB have not been identified in rice, indicating that the mechanisms underlying rice resistance to R. solani AG1-IA remain largely unexplored [176,177]. Emerging evidence indicates that osa-miRNAs play a pivotal role in host–fungal interactions and resistance responses. However, the majority of existing studies have concentrated on M. oryzae, a hemibiotrophic fungus [178]. Consequently, there is a notable lack of research regarding the genetic regulation of miRNA-mediated interactions between rice and R. solani.
Consistent with the ongoing research described above, there is only limited knowledge about the details of R. solani-responsive miRNAs [177]. Five independent studies have examined the expression profiles of osa-miRNAs across various rice cultivars during R. solani infection, utilizing high-throughput small RNA sequencing methodologies [73,178,179,180,181]. Although the mechanisms of rice–R. solani interactions regulated by osa-miRNAs are emerging, only three osa-miRNAs, osa-miR160a [45], osa-miR395a [73], and osa-miR444.2 [74], have been identified as involved in the regulation of rice sheath blight.
In rice, three mature osa-miR160 variants are distinguished by a single nucleotide substitution and target multiple AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) genes [18,46,182]. The osa-miR160a-ARFs module has been reported to play a role in the basal defense response of Arabidopsis [183] and in resistance to rice blast disease in the indica cultivar Kasalath [46]. Furthermore, osa-miR160a has been shown to enhance broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice against the pathogens M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani by downregulating the expression of a subset of ARF genes [45]. Among these ARFs, ARF8 serves as a negative regulator of broad-spectrum disease resistance by directly binding to the promoter region of WRKY45 [45]. These findings offer new resources to potentially improve disease resistance in rice breeding.
Through a high-throughput small RNA sequencing analysis of the indica rice variety Pusa Basmati-1 infected by R. solani at various time points, it was observed that osa-miR395a, osa-miR408-3p, osa-miR171i-5p, and osa-miR1861d, along with a novel osa-miRNA, osa-NmiR1, exhibited responsiveness to the dynamic and coordinated transcriptional changes induced by R. solani [73]. Osa-miR395a was found to bind to and cleave the mRNA coding for pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins [73]. In alignment with previous studies, the pentapeptide (Os12t0109300-01; LOC-Os12g01850) was identified as a high-confidence target for rice osa-miR395a [184]. In rice, OsPPRs, specifically OsPPR6, have been implicated in the processes of chloroplast RNA editing and processing [185], which are facilitated by the E and DYW domains located at the C-terminus [186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193]. Furthermore, the increased expression of the pentatricopeptide repeat for germination on NaCl (PGN) gene has been reported in response to necrotrophic fungal pathogens, Alternaria Brassicicola (A. brassicicola) and Botrytis cinerea (B. cinerea), in Arabidopsis [194]. Consistent with the findings of [194], infection by R. solani resulted in the up-regulation of PPR via osa-miR395a, potentially due to the induction of chloroplast degradation [73].
Osa-miR444 comprises six members: osa-miR444a, b, c, d, e, and f. Among these, osa-miR444b and osa-miR444a differ by only one single nucleotide and have been reported to play a significant role in the response to environmental stress [195]. Osa-miR444a is involved in the regulation of the NO3− signaling pathway, which is critical for nitrate-dependent root growth, nitrate accumulation, and responses to phosphate starvation. This regulation is accompanied by the suppression of MADS-box gene expression [18,196,197]. Furthermore, the overexpression of osa-miR444 in transgenic plants has been shown to enhance rice resistance to RSV infection by up-regulating the expression of OsRDR1, thereby facilitating the RNA silencing of RSV [198]. In contrast, the overexpression of osa-miR444b.2 has been associated with reduced resistance to R. solani, which is attributed to its impact on the expression of genes related to plant hormone signaling pathways, such as ET and IAA, as well as transcription factors including WRKYs and F-box proteins [74]. Additionally, the overexpression of osa-miR444b.2 has been found to influence agronomic traits in rice, resulting in a decrease in the number of primary branches and tillers, while simultaneously increasing panicle length [74].

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

In summary, significant progress is clearly being made in elucidating the role of osa-miRNAs in conferring immunity against rice blast disease and bacterial leaf blight. However, the comprehension of the interaction between osa-miRNAs and rice sheath blight remains limited. Future research should further elucidate the role of osa-miRNAs and identify novel osa-miRNAs in rice–pathogen interactions against Xoo, M. oryzae, and particularly R. solani. Additionally, it is imperative to explore the functions of key components within pertinent osa-miRNAs signaling pathways. It is unequivocal that the continued identification, validation, and analysis of more osa-miRNA modules, along with the advancement of osa-miRNA-based breeding strategies, will enhance the application of osa-miRNAs in improving rice disease resistance and ensuring crop security.
The goal of breeding is to produce high-yielding and disease-resistant rice varieties. This can be achieved by enhancing the expression of target genes and/or suppressing the accumulation of miRNAs or taking the opposite of the two approaches [11]. Specific strategies may include creating osa-miRNA-cleavage-resistant targets, utilizing constitutive or inducible promoters, applying STTM, and employing the CRISPR/Cas-mediated editing of osa-miRNAs and their targets [6,11].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and investigation, Y.J., Q.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J.; supervision, K.W., W.Z. and J.Q.; project administration, Y.J. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32201777). In addition, we are very grateful to the “Tianchi Talents” introduction plan in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region for providing financial support for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Mencia, R.; Gonzalo, L.; Tossolini, I.; Manavella, P.A. Keeping up with the miRNAs: Current paradigms of the biogenesis pathway. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 2213–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shang, R.F.; Lee, S.; Senavirathne, G.; Lai, E.C. MicroRNAs in action: Biogenesis, function and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023, 24, 816–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Song, X.; Li, Y.; Cao, X.; Qi, Y. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plant-environment interactions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 489–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, L.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ni, F.; Chang, L.; Qi, Y. DNA methylation mediated by a MicroRNA pathway. Mol. Cell 2010, 38, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, T.X.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Xu, L.; Li, J.R.; Yijun Qi, Y.J. Evolution of lmiRNAs and their targets from MITEs for rice adaptation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 2411–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, J.Y.; Chu, C.C. MicroRNAs in crop improvement: Fine-tuners for complex traits. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, Q.K.; Hu, B.B.; Zhang, C. MicroRNAs and their roles in plant development. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 824240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chandra, T.; Jaiswal, S.; Iquebal, M.A.; Singh, R.; Gautam, R.K.; Rai, A.; Kumar, D. Revitalizing miRNAs mediated agronomical advantageous traits improvement in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Karikari, B.; Sharif, R.; Yadav, V.; Mubarik, M.S.; Habib, M.; Zhuang, Y.H.; Zhang, C.; Chen, H.; et al. MiRNAs for crop improvement. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Asadi, M.; Millar, A.A. Review: Plant microRNAs in pathogen defense: A panacea or a piece of the puzzle? Plant Sci. 2024, 341, 111993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, E.H.; Zhao, T.L.; Zhu, Q.H. Are miRNAs applicable for balancing crop growth and defense trade-off? New Phytol. 2024, 243, 1670–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhan, J.P.; Meyers, B.C. Plant small RNAs: Their biogenesis, regulatory roles, and functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2023, 74, 21–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gonzalo, L.; Tossolini, I.; Gulanicz, T.; Cambiagno, D.A.; Kasprowicz-Maluski, A.; Smolinski, D.J.; Mammarella, M.F.; Ariel, F.D.; Marquardt, S.; Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z.; et al. R-loops at microRNA encoding loci promote co-transcriptional processing of pri-miRNAs in plants. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 402–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yu, Y.; Jia, T.R.; Chen, X.M. The ‘how’ and ‘where’ of plant microRNAs. New Phytol. 2017, 216, 1002–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.B.; Le, B.; Ma, X.; Li, S.F.; You, C.J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, B.L.; Liu, L.; Gao, L.; Shi, T.; et al. Biogenesis of phased siRNAs on membrane-bound polysomes in Arabidopsis. eLife 2016, 5, e22750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Y.; Xuemei Chen, X.M. MicroRNA biogenesis and stabilization in plants. Fundam. Res. 2023, 3, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Iwakawa, H.O.; Tomari, Y. Life of RISC: Formation, action, and degradation of RNA-induced silencing complex. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Ni, F.; Wu, X.; Qi, Y. Rice microRNA effector complexes and targets. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3421–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, Q.; Wang, Y.N.; Sun, Z.H.; Li, H.Y.; Liu, H. The biosynthesis process of small RNA and its pivotal roles in plant development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, Q.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhong, Z.H.; Feng, S.H.; Wang, C.S.; Xiao, L.F.; Yang, Z.L.; Harris, C.J.; Wu, Z.; et al. Mechanism of siRNA production by a plant Dicer-RNA complex in dicing-competent conformation. Science 2021, 374, 1152–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, S.; Linquist, B.A.; Wilson, L.T.; Cassman, K.G.; Stuart, A.M.; Pede, V.; Miro, B.; Saito, K.; Agustiani, N.; Aristya, V.E.; et al. Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dai, L.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Xiao, Y.H.; Wang, G.L. Recent advances in cloning and characterization of disease resistance genes in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 49, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, F.N.; Rush, M.C. Rice sheath blight: A major rice disease. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mizukami, T.; Wakimoto, S. Epidemiology and control of bacterial leaf blight of rice. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1969, 7, 51–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ou, S.H. Pathogen variability and host resistance in rice blast disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1980, 18, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Esse, H.P.; Reuber, T.L.; Does, D.V. Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S.J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N.; Nelson, A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cheng, X.; Zhu, L.; He, G. Towards understanding of molecular interactions between rice and the brown planthopper. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 621–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Deng, Y.; Ning, Y.; Yang, D.L.; Zhai, K.; Wang, G.L.; He, Z. Molecular basis of disease resistance and perspectives on breeding strategies for resistance improvement in crops. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1402–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, W.; Deng, Y.; Ning, Y.; He, Z.; Wang, G.L. Exploiting broad-spectrum disease resistance in crops: From molecular dissection to breeding. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 575–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kourelis, J.; Hoorn, R.A.L. Defended to the Nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dangl, J.L.; Horvath, D.M.; Staskawicz, B.J. Pivoting the plant immune system from dissection to deployment. Science 2013, 341, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nelson, R.; Wiesner-Hanks, T.; Wisser, R.; Balint-Kurti, P. Navigating complexity to breed disease-resistant crops. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, G.L. MicroRNAs and their diverse functions in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yao, S.Z.; Yang, Z.R.; Yang, R.X.; Huang, Y.; Guo, G.; Kong, X.Y.; Lan, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.M.; et al. Transcriptional regulation of miR528 by OsSPL9 orchestrates antiviral response in rice. Mol. Plant. 2019, 12, 1114–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xie, M.; Zhang, S.; Yu, B. MicroRNA biogenesis, degradation and activity in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baldrich, P.; Campo, S.; Wu, M.T.; Liu, T.T.; Hsing, Y.I.C.; Segundo, B.S. MicroRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression in the response of rice plants to fungal elicitors. RNA Biol. 2015, 12, 847–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, J.; Yang, M.; Zhang, X. The function of small RNAs in plant biotic stress response. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, Y.; Jeyakumar, J.M.J.; Feng, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Fan, J.; Khaskheli, M.I.; Wang, W. The roles of rice microRNAs in rice Magnaporthe oryzae interaction. Phytopathol. Res. 2019, 1, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Zhao, S.; Li, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Cao, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Yang, N.; et al. Osa-miR169 negatively regulates rice immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhao, Z.; Feng, Q.; Cao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, H.; Chandran, V.; Fan, J.; Zhao, J.; Pu, M.; Li, Y.; et al. Osa-miR167d facilitates infection of Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 702–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Y.; Tong, Y.; He, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, T.; Lin, X.; Mao, W.; Gishkori, Z.G.N.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J.; et al. The rice miR171b–SCL6-IIs module controls blast resistance, grain yield, and flowering. Crop J. 2022, 10, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Bao, Y.; Shan, D.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; He, L.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Magnaporthe oryzae induces the expression of a microRNA to suppress the immune response in rice. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 352–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhou, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, S.; et al. Osa-miR535 targets SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like 4 to regulate blast disease resistance in rice. Plant J. 2022, 110, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Feng, Q.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Hu, Z.W.; Zhou, X.H.; Xiang, L.; Xiong, X.Y.; He, X.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, G.B.; et al. Osa-miR160a confers broad-spectrum resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens in rice. New Phytol. 2022, 236, 2216–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wu, L.; Xu, Y.; Huang, F.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Zhao, J.; et al. Multiple rice microRNAs are involved in immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1077–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Lin, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, B.; Song, X.; Ding, S.; Zheng, L.Y.; Feng, R.Y.; Chen, S.L. Osa-miR164a targets OsNAC60 and negatively regulates rice immunity against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant J. 2018, 95, 584–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhou, S.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; et al. Expressing a target mimic of miR156fhl-3p enhances rice blast disease resistance without yield penalty by improving SPL14 expression. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, Y.; Cao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, K.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, G.; et al. Osa-miR398b boosts H2O2 production and rice blast disease-resistance via multiple superoxide dismutases. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1507–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sanchez-Sanuy, F.; Peris-Peris, C.; Tomiyama, S.; Okada, K.; Hsing, Y.I.; Segundo, B.S.; Campo, S. Osa-miR7695 enhances transcriptional priming in defense responses against the rice blast fungus. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Campo, S.; Peris-Peris, C.; Sire, C.; Moreno, A.B.; Donaire, L.; Zytnicki, M.; Notredame, C.; Llave, C.; Segundo, B.S. Identification of a novel microRNA (miRNA) from rice that targets an alternatively spliced transcript of the Nramp6 (Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 6) gene involved in pathogen resistance. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Quoc, N.B.; Phuong, N.D.N.; Trang, H.T.T.; Phi, N.B.; Chau, N.N.B. Expression of osa-miR7695 against the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in vietnamese rice cultivars. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 155, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salvador-Guirao, R.; Hsing, Y.I.; Segundo, B.S. The polycistronic miR166k-166h positively regulates rice immunity via post-transcriptional control of EIN2. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chandran, V.; Wang, H.; Gao, F.; Cao, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, G.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.M.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhao, Z.X.; et al. miR396-OsGRFs module balances growth and rice blast disease-resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; et al. Osa-miR162a fine-tunes rice resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and yield. Rice 2020, 13, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Chern, M.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Li, X.; Dang, W.; Ma, X.; Yang, Z.; et al. Suppression of rice miR168 improves yield, flowering time and immunity. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sheng, C.; Li, X.; Xia, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Tang, C.; Xu, L.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, T.; et al. An OsPRMT5-OsAGO2/miR1875-OsHXK1 module regulates rice immunity to blast disease. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 1077–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Campo, S.; Sanchez-Sanuy, F.; Camargo-Ramırez, R.; Gomez-Ariza, J.; Baldrich, P.; Campos-Soriano, L.; Soto-Suarez, M.; Segundo, B.S. A novel transposable element-derived microRNA participates in plant immunity to rice blast disease. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1798–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhou, S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; et al. Osa-miR1873 fine-tunes rice immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae and yield traits. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 1213–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chen, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, T.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhou, S.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Pu, M.; et al. Fine-tuning roles of Osa-miR159a in rice immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae and development. Rice 2021, 14, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, Y.; Li, T.; He, X.; Zhu, Y.; Feng, Q.; Yang, X.M.; Zhou, X.H.; Li, G.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, J.; et al. Blocking Osa-miR1871 enhances rice resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae and yield. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 646–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lu, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, J.; Li, T.; Hu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, J.; Pu, M.; Hui, F.; et al. Osa-miR439 negatively regulates rice immunity against Magnaporthe oryzae. Rice Sci. 2021, 28, 156–165. [Google Scholar]
  63. Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Bhutto, S.; He, X.; Yang, X.; Zhou, X.; Lin, X.; Rajput, A.; Li, G.; Zhao, J.; et al. Blocking miR530 improves rice resistance, yield, and maturity. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 729560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, X.; Yang, X.; He, X.; Feng, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Li, G.B.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; et al. Rice miR1432 fine-tunes the balance of yield and blast disease resistance via different modules. Rice 2021, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, M.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, K.; Liu, J.; Hu, X.; Di, C.; Qian, Q.; et al. Inducible overexpression of Ideal Plant Architecture1 improves both yield and disease resistance in rice. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hui, S.; Ke, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Yuan, M. Rice microRNA156/529-SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING modules regulate defenses against bacteria. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2537–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yu, C.; Chen, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Bi, Y.; Tian, F.; Yang, F.; Rothstein, S.J.; Zhou, X.; et al. Overexpression of miR169o, an overlapping microRNA in response to both nitrogen limitation and bacterial infection, promotes nitrogen use efficiency and susceptibility to bacterial blight in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1234–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jiang, G.; Liu, D.; Yin, D.; Zhou, Z.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.; Zhu, L.; Zhai, W. A rice NBS-ARC gene conferring quantitative resistance to bacterial blight is regulated by a pathogen effector-inducible miRNA. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1752–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jia, Y.; Li, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, P.; Liu, D.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Zhai, W. Characteristic dissection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae responsive microRNAs in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Jia, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhai, W.; Jiang, G.; Li, C. Inducible enrichment of osa-miR1432 confers rice bacterial blight resistance through suppressing OsCaML2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yang, Z.; Hui, S.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chen, D.; Tian, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Cao, J.; Xie, W.; et al. miR395-regulated sulfate metabolism exploits pathogen sensitivity to sulfate to boost immunity in rice. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 671–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhu, X.; Kuang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J.; Cao, Y.; Hu, J.; Yu, C.; Yang, F.; Tian, F.; Chen, H. miR2118 negatively regulates bacterial blight resistance through targeting several disease resistance genes in rice. Plants 2023, 12, 3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Srikakulam, N.; Guria, A.; Karanthamalai, J.; Murugesan, V.; Krishnan, V.; Sundaramoorthy, K.; Saha, S.; Singh, R.; Victorathisayam, T.; Rajapriya, V.; et al. An insight into pentatricopeptide-mediated chloroplast necrosis via microRNA395a during Rhizoctonia solani infection. Front. Genet. 2022, 3, 869465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Feng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, P.; Feng, Z.; Zuo, S.; Ouyang, S. Suppression of rice osa-miR444.2 improves the resistance to sheath blight in rice mediating through the phytohormone pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dai, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Zhao, P. psRNATarget: A plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W49–W54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wu, H.; Ma, Y.; Chen, T.; Wang, M.; Wang, X. PsRobot: A web-based plant small RNA meta-analysis toolbox. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W22–W28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. German, M.A.; Pillay, M.; Jeong, D.H.; Hetawal, A.; Luo, S.J.; Janardhanan, P.; Kannan, V.; Rymarquis, L.A.; Nobuta, K.; German, R.; et al. Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, J.; Deng, K.; Cheng, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Tian, L.; Tang, X.; Tang, A.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, T.; Qi, Y.; et al. CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing reveals new insights into microRNA function and regulation in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhou, J.; Zhong, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Zheng, X.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Knocking out microRNA genes in rice with CRISPR-Cas9. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1917, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  80. Bi, H.; Fei, Q.; Li, R.; Liu, B.; Xia, R.; Char, S.N.; Meyers, B.C.; Yang, B. Disruption of miRNA sequences by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 induces varied lengths of miRNA production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1526–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kumar, K.; Mandal, S.N.; Neelam, K.; Reyes, B.G. MicroRNA-mediated host defense mechanisms against pathogens and herbivores in rice: Balancing gains from genetic resistance with trade-offs to productivity potential. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, X.; Ronald, P.C. Innate immunity in rice. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Thordal-Christensen, H. A holistic view on plant effector-triggered immunity presented as an iceberg model. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 3963–3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xin, X.; Kvitko, B.; He, S. Pseudomonas syringae: What it takes to be a pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 316–328. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, C.; Ding, Z.; Wu, K.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Yang, Z.; Shi, S.; Liu, X.; Zhao, S.; Yang, Z.; et al. Suppression of jasmonic acid-mediated defense by viralinducible microRNA319 facilitates virus infection in rice. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1302–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dean, R.A.; Talbot, N.J.; Ebbole, D.J.; Farman, M.L.; Mitchell, T.K.; Orbach, M.J.; Thon, M.; Kulkarni, R.; Xu, J.; Pan, H.; et al. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature 2005, 21, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, W.; Chern, M.; Yin, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, X. Recent advances in broad-spectrum resistance to the rice blast disease. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 50, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, B.; Ebbole, D.; Wang, Z. The arms race between Magnaporthe oryzae and rice: Diversity and interaction of Avr and R genes. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2746–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xie, Z.; Yan, B.; Shou, J.; Tang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhai, K.; Liu, J.; Li, Q.; Luo, M.; Deng, Y.; et al. A nucleotide-binding siteleucine-rich repeat receptor pair confers broad-spectrum disease resistance through physical association in rice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 374, 20180308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Yuan, M. An update on molecular mechanism of disease resistance genes and their application for genetic improvement of rice. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dong, S.; Zhang, J.; Sun, D.; Liu, H.; Yang, Q.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J. Identification of Magnaporthe oryzae-elicited rice novel miRNAs and their targets by miRNA and degradome sequencing. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 151, 629–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, Z.; Xia, J.; Chen, Z.; Yu, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, W.; et al. Large-scale rewiring of innate immunity circuitry and microRNA regulation during initial rice blast infection. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Javed, M.; Reddy, B.; Sheoran, N.; Ganesan, P.; Kumar, A. Unraveling the transcriptional network regulated by miRNAs in blast-resistant and blast-susceptible rice genotypes during Magnaporthe oryzae interaction. Gene 2023, 886, 147718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, H.; Hu, B.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, Y.; Gao, X.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.H.; Chu, C. Identification of microRNAs in rice root in response to nitrate and ammonium. J. Genet. Genom. 2016, 43, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Khan, A.; Goswami, K.; Sopory, S.K.; Sanan-Mishra, N. “Mirador” on the potential role of miRNAs in synergy of light and heat networks. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 22, 587–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Jin, Y.; Chen, Z.; Fang, Y.; Hua, C.; Ding, S.; Guo, H. Cotton plants export microRNAs to inhibit virulence gene expression in a fungal pathogen. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, J.; He, H.; Jia, G. The lre-miR159a-LrGAMYB pathway mediates resistance to grey mould infection in Lilium regale. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2020, 21, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sharma, N.; Sahu, P.; Prasad, A.; Muthamilarasan, M.; Waseem, M.; Khan, Y.; Thakur, J.K.; Chakraborty, S.; Prasad, S. The Sw5a gene confers resistance to ToLCNDV and triggers an HR response after direct AC4 effector recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2101833118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yu, X.; Lin, X.; Zhou, T.; Cao, L.; Hu, K.; Li, F.; Qu, S. Host-induced gene silencing in wild apple germplasm Malus hupehensis confers resistance to the fungal pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant J. 2024, 118, 1174–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tong, A.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, S.; Peng, J.; Lu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Lin, L.; Chen, H.; Gong, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Altered accumulation of osa-miR171b contributes to rice stripe virus infection by regulating disease symptoms. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4357–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hou, X.; Lee, L.; Xia, K.; Yan, Y.; Yu, H. DELLAs modulate jasmonate signaling via competitive binding to JAZs. Dev. Cell 2010, 19, 884–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, Z.; Ogawa, M.; Fleet, C.M.; Zentella, R.; Hu, J.; Heo, J.O.; Lim, J.; Kamiya, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Sun, T.P. Scarecrow-like 3 promotes gibberellin signaling by antagonizing master growth repressor DELLA in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2160–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ma, Z.; Hu, X.; Cai, W.; Huang, W.; Zhou, X.; Luo, Q.; Yang, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, J. Arabidopsis miR171-targeted scarecrow-like proteins bind to GT ciselements and mediate gibberellin-regulated chlorophyll biosynthesis under light conditions. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Liu, H.; He, M.; Yang, Z.; Kong, F.; Liu, X.; Hou, X. DELLA and EDS1 form a feedback regulatory module to fine-tune plant growth-defense tradeoff in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Balyan, S.; Kumar, M.; Mutum, R.D.; Raghuvanshi, U.; Agarwal, P.; Mathur, S.; Raghuvanshi, S. Identification of miRNA-mediated drought responsive multi-tiered regulatory network in drought tolerant rice, Nagina 22. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ryu, M.; Mishra, R.C.; Jeon, J.; Lee, S.K.; Bae, H. Drought-induced susceptibility for Cenangium ferruginosum leads to progression of Cenangium-dieback disease in Pinus koraiensis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sun, M.; Shen, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, J.; Cai, X.; Zheng, G.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, B.; Sun, X. The multiple roles of OsmiR535 in modulating plant height, panicle branching and grain shape. Plant Sci. 2019, 283, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Xie, K.; Wu, C.; Xiong, L. Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding-like transcription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, L.; Sun, S.; Jin, J.; Fu, D.; Yang, X.; Weng, X.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q. Coordinated regulation of vegetative and reproductive branching in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15504–15509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yan, Y.; Wei, M.X.; Li, Y.; Tao, H.; Wu, H.Y.; Chen, Z.F.; Li, C.; Xu, J.H. MiR529a controls plant height, tiller number, panicle architecture and grain size by regulating SPL target genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci. 2021, 302, 110728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, L.; Ming, L.; Liao, K.; Xia, C.; Sun, S.; Chang, Y.; Wang, H.; Fu, D.; Xu, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Bract suppression regulated by the miR156/529-SPLs-NL1-PLA1 module is required for the transition from vegetative to reproductive branching in rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1168–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li, Y.; He, Y.; Qin, T.; Guo, X.; Xu, K.; Xu, C.; Yuan, W. Functional conservation and divergence of miR156 and miR529 during rice development. Crop J. 2023, 11, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, J.; Zhou, L.; Shi, H.; Chern, M.; Yu, H.; Yi, H.; He, M.; Yin, J.; Zhu, X.; Li, Y.; et al. A single transcription factor promotes both yield and immunity in rice. Science 2018, 361, 1026–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Ye, R.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ji, S.; Liu, R.; Xu, L.; et al. Viral-inducible Argonaute18 confers broad-spectrum virus resistance in rice by sequestering a host microRNA. eLife 2015, 4, e05733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Yang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Yao, S.; Zhao, K.; Wang, D.; Qin, Q.; Bian, Z.; Li, Y.; Lan, Y.; et al. Jasmonate signaling enhances RNA silencing and antiviral defense in rice. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 28, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, Z.; Chen, D.; Sun, F.; Guo, W.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Lan, Y.; Du, L.; Li, S.; Fan, Y.; et al. ARGONAUTE 2 increases rice susceptibility to rice black-streaked dwarf virus infection by epigenetically regulating HEXOKINASE 1 expression. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 1029–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Aguilera-Alvarado, G.P.; Sanchez-Nieto, S. Plant hexokinases are multifaceted proteins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hu, D.; Sun, C.; Zhang, Q.; An, J.P.; You, C.; Hao, Y. Glucose sensor MdHXK1 phosphorylates and stabilizes MdbHLH3 to promote anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, Z.; He, L.; Xu, K.; Wang, G. Glucose triggers stomatal closure mediated by basal signaling through HXK1 and PYR/RCAR receptors in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1471–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ye, W.; Munemasa, S.; Shinya, T.; Wu, W.; Ma, T.; Lu, J.; Kinoshita, T.; Kaku, H.; Shibuya, N.; Murata, Y. Stomatal immunity against fungal invasion comprises not only chitin-induced stomatal closure but also chitosan-induced guard cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 20932–20942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, N.; Wang, M.; Huang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, D.; Shu, X. MOS1 negatively regulates sugar responses and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Qian, G.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, Z.; Wang, S.; Fan, J.; Hu, B.; Venturi, V.; Liu, F. Proteomic analysis reveals novel extracellular virulence-associated proteins and functions regulated by the diffusible signal factor (DSF) in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 3327–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, R.; Liu, F.; Hu, B.; Walcott, R.R. Simultaneous detection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola in rice seed using a padlock probe-based assay. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 1130–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Nino-Liu, D.O.; Ronald, P.C.; Bogdanove, A.J. Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars: Model pathogens of a model crop. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2006, 7, 303–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yoshimura, S.; Yamanouchi, U.; Katayose, Y.; Toki, S.; Wang, Z.; Kono, I.; Kurata, N.; Yano, M.; Sasaki, T. Expression of Xa1, a bacterial blight-resistance gene in rice, is induced by bacterial inoculation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 1663–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ji, C.; Ji, Z.; Liu, B.; Cheng, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, B.; Chen, G. Xa1 allelic R genes activate rice blight resistance suppressed by interfering TAL effectors. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Li, F.; Ouyang, Y..; Yuan, M.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. Multiple alleles encoding atypical NLRs with unique central tandem repeats in rice confer resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Commun. 2020, 1, 100088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Zhang, J.; Coaker, G.; Zhou, J.; Dong, X. Plant immune mechanisms: From reductionistic to holistic points of view. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1358–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Sun, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q. Xa26, a gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice, encodes an LRR receptor kinase-like protein. Plant J. 2004, 37, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Xiang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Xa3, conferring resistance for rice bacterial blight and encoding a receptor kinaselike protein, is the same as Xa26. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, K.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J.; Xia, F.; Ke, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Liu, H.; Cui, Y.; Cao, Y.; et al. Improvement of multiple agronomic traits by a disease resistance gene via cell wall reinforcement. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Iyer, A.S.; McCouch, S.R. The rice bacterial blight resistance gene xa5 encodes a novel form of disease resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2004, 17, 1348–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jiang, G.; Xia, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wan, J.; Li, D.; Chen, R.; Zhai, W.; Zhu, L. Testifying the rice bacterial blight resistance gene xa5 by genetic complementation and further analyzing xa5 (Xa5) in comparison with its homolog TFIIAg1. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2006, 275, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tian, D.; Wang, J.; Zeng, X.; Gu, K.; Qiu, C.; Yang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Goh, M.; Luo, Y.; Murata-Hori, M.; et al. The rice TAL effector dependent resistance protein XA10 triggers cell death and calcium depletion in the endoplasmic reticulum. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 497–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yang, B.; Sugio, A.; White, F.F. Os8N3 is a host disease susceptibility gene for bacterial blight of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 2006, 103, 10503–10508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Song, W.; Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Kim, H.S.; Pi, L.; Holsten, T.; Gardner, J.; Wang, B.; Zhai, W.; Zhu, L.; et al. A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science 1995, 270, 1804–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Zheng, C.; Qin, T.; Li, Y.; Che, J.; Zhang, M.; et al. XA23 is an executor R protein and confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, Q.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. A paralog of the MtN3/saliva family recessively confers race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1958–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Gu, K.; Yang, B.; Tian, D.; Wu, L.; Wang, D.; Sreekala, C.; Yang, F.; Chu, Z.; Wang, G.; White, F.F.; et al. R gene expression induced by a type-III effector triggers disease resistance in rice. Nature 2005, 435, 1122–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hutin, M.; Sabot, F.O.; Ghesquiere, A.; Koebnik, R.; Szurek, B. A knowledge-based molecular screen uncovers a broadspectrum OsSWEET14 resistance allele to bacterial blight from wild rice. Plant J. 2016, 84, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Chen, X.; Liu, P.; Mei, L.; He, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Shen, S.; Ji, Z.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Xa7, a new executor R gene that confers durable and broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight disease in rice. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. White, F.F.; Yang, B. Host and pathogen factors controlling the rice-Xanthomonas oryzae interaction. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Fahad, S.; Nie, L.X.; Khan, F.A.; Chen, Y.; Hussain, S.; Wu, C.; Xiong, D.; Jing, W.; Saud, S.; Khan, F.A.; et al. Disease resistance in rice and the role of molecular breeding in protecting rice crops against diseases. Biotechnol. Lett. 2014, 36, 1407–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Hop, D.V.; Hoa, P.T.; Quang, N.; Ton, P.H.; Ha, T.H.; Huang, N.V.; Van, N.T.; Hai, T.V.; Quy, N.T.; Dao, N.T.; et al. Biological control of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae causing rice bacterial blight disease by Streptomyces toxytricini VN08-A-12, isolated from soil and leaf-litter samples in Vietnam. Biocontrol Sci. 2014, 19, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bimolata, W.; Kumar, A.; Reddy, S.K.; Sundaram, R.M.; Laha, G.S.; Qureshi, I.A.; Ghazi, I.A. Nucleotide diversity analysis of three major bacterial blight resistance genes in rice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ji, Z.; Ji, C.; Liu, B.; Zou, L.; Chen, G.; Yang, B. Interfering TAL effectors of Xanthomonas oryzae neutralize R-gene-mediated plant disease resistance. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, Q.; Wang, B.; Yu, J.; Dou, D. Pathogen-informed breeding for crop disease resistance. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Dilla-Ermita, C.J.; Tandayu, E.; Juanillas, V.M.; Detras, J.; Lozada, D.N.; Dwiyanti, M.S.; Cruz, C.V.; Mbanjo, E.G.; Ardales, E.; Diaz, M.G.; et al. Genome-wide association analysis tracks bacterial leaf blight resistance loci in rice diverse germplasm. Rice 2017, 10, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Kim, S.M.; Reinke, R.F. A novel resistance gene for bacterial blight in rice, Xa43(t) identified by GWAS, confirmed by QTL mapping using a bi-parental population. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Oliva, R.; Ji, C.H.; Atienza-Grande, G.; Huguet-Tapia, J.C.; Perez-Quintero, A.; Li, T.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Nguyen, H.; Liu, B.; et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Xu, Z.; Xu, X.; Gong, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Ma, W.; Liu, L.; Zhu, B.; et al. Engineering broad-spectrum bacterial blight resistance by simultaneously disrupting variable TALE-binding elements of multiple susceptibility genes in rice. Mol. Plant 2019, 112, 1434–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ni, Z.; Cao, Y.; Jin, X.; Fu, Z.; Li, J.; Mo, X.; He, Y.; Tang, J.; Huang, S. Engineering resistance to bacterial blight and bacterial leaf streak in rice. Rice 2021, 14, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Wei, Z.; Abdelrahman, M.; Gao, Y.; Ji, Z.; Mishra, R.; Sun, H.; Sui, Y.; Wu, C.; Wang, C.; Zhao, K. Engineering broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated precise homology directed repair in rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, M.; Li, S.; Li, H.; Song, C.; Xie, W.; Zuo, S.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, C.; Ji, Z.; Zhou, H. Genome editing of a dominant resistance gene for broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial diseases in rice without growth penalty. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024, 22, 529–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zhao, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, Z.; Fang, R.; Wang, X.; Jia, Y. Dynamic and coordinated expression changes of rice small RNAs in response to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. J. Genet. Genom. 2015, 42, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Hong, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Small RNAs and gene network in a durable disease resistance gene--mediated defense responses in rice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lu, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, F.; Zeng, D.; Zhou, Y. Comparative microRNA profiling reveals microRNAs involved in rice resistant response to bacterial blight. Crop J. 2021, 9, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Liang, G.; Yang, F.; Yu, D. MicroRNA395 mediates regulation of sulfate accumulation and allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010, 62, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar]
  160. Yuan, N.; Yuan, S.; Li, Z.; Li, D.; Hu, Q.; Luo, H. Heterologous expression of a rice miR395 gene in Nicotiana tabacum impairs sulfate homeostasis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Li, W.; Oono, Y.; Zhu, J.; He, X.; Wu, J.; Iida, K.; Lu, X.; Cui, X.; Jin, H.; Zhu, J. The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2238–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhao, M.; Ding, H.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Li, W. Involvement of miR169 in the nitrogen-starvation responses in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2011, 190, 906–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Xu, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Hu, X.; Wang, M.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L. Stress-induced early flowering is mediated by miR169 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Xing, L.; Zhu, M.; Luan, M.; Zhang, M.; Jin, L.; Liu, Y.; Zou, J.; Wang, L.; Xu, M. miR169q and NUCLEAR FACTOR YA8 enhance salt tolerance by activating PEROXIDASE1 expression in response to ROS. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 608–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Rhoades, M.W.; Reinhart, B.J.; Lim, L.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 2002, 110, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Combier, J.P.; Frugier, F.; de Billy, F.; Boualem, A.; El-Yahyaoui, F.; Moreau, S.; Vernie, T.; Ott, T.; Gamas, P.; Crespi, M.; et al. MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 3084–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Nelson, D.E.; Repetti, P.P.; Adams, T.R.; Creelman, R.A.; Wu, J.; Warner, D.C.; Anstrom, D.C.; Bensen, R.J.; Castiglioni, P.P.; Donnarummo, M.G.; et al. Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16450–16455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zhao, B.; Ge, L.; Liang, R.; Li, W.; Ruan, K.; Lin, H.; Jin, Y. Members of miR-169 family are induced by high salinity and transiently inhibit the NF-YA transcription factor. BMC Mol. Biol. 2009, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, J.; Howell, S.H. bZIP28 and NF-Y transcription factors are activated by ER stress and assemble into a transcriptional complex to regulate stress response genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 782–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Addo-Quaye, C.; Zhang, L.; Saini, A.; Jagadeeswaran, G.; Axtell, M.J.; Zhang, W.; Sunkar, R. Transcriptome-wide identification of microRNA targets in rice. Plant J. 2010, 62, 742–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Zhou, M.; Gu, L.; Li, P.; Song, X.; Wei, L.; Chen, Z.; Cao, X. Degradome sequencing reveals endogenous small RNAtargets in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Front. Biol. 2010, 5, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Petroni, K.; Kumimoto, R.W.; Gnesutta, N.; Calvenzani, V.; Fornari, M.; Tonelli, C.; Holt, B.F.; Mantovani, R. The promiscuous life of plant NUCLEAR FACTOR Y transcription factors. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4777–4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gautam, K.; Rao, P.B.; Chauhan, S.V.S. Efficacy of some botanicals of the family compositae against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 33, 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  174. Rao, T.B.; Chopperla, R.; Prathi, N.B.; Balakrishnan, M.; Prakasam, V.; Laha, G.S.; Balachandran, S.M.; Mangrauthia, S.K. A comprehensive gene expression profile of pectin degradation enzymes reveals the molecular events during cell wall degradation and pathogenesis of rice sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zou, J.; Pan, X.; Chen, Z.; Xu, J.; Lu, J.; Zhai, W.; Zhu, L. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling sheath blight resistance in two rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wang, A.; Shu, X.; Jing, X.; Jiao, C.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Ma, L.; Jiang, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Li, S.; et al. Identification of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genes involved in sheath blight resistance via a genome-wide association study. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1553–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Molla, K.A.; Karmakar, S.; Molla, J.; Bajaj, P.; Varshney, R.K.; Datta, S.K.; Karabi Datta, K. Understanding sheath blight resistance in rice: The road behind and the road ahead. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 895–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chopperla, R.; Mangrauthia, S.K.; Rao, T.B.; Balakrishnan, M.; Balachandran, S.M.; Prakasam, V.; Channappa, G. A comprehensive analysis of microRNAs expressed in susceptible and resistant rice cultivars during Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA infection causing sheath blight disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Lin, R.; He, L.; He, J.; Qin, P.; Wang, Y.; Deng, Q.; Yang, X.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, W.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of microRNA-Seq and target mRNAs of rice sheath blight pathogen provides new insights into pathogenic regulatory mechanisms. DNA Res. 2016, 23, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cao, W.; Cao, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Z.; OuYang, S.; Zuo, S. Comprehensive characteristics of microRNA expression profile conferring to Rhizoctonia solani in rice. Rice Sci. 2020, 27, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  181. Sasani, S.T.; Soltani, B.M.; Mehrabi, R.; Padasht-Dehkaei, H.S. Expression alteration of candidate rice miRNAs in response to sheath blight disease. Iran. J. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, e2451. [Google Scholar]
  182. Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, D. Deregulation of the OsmiR160 target gene OsARF18 causes growth and developmental defects with an alteration of auxin signaling in rice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wu, L.; Qi, Y.; Zhou, J. Identification of microRNAs involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered plant innate immunity. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 2222–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X. Exploring heat-response mechanisms of microRNAs based on microarray data of rice post-meiosis panicle. Int. J. Genom. 2020, 2020, 7582612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Tang, J.; Zhang, W.; Wen, K.; Chen, G.; Sun, J.; Tian, Y.; Tang, W.; Yu, J.; An, H.; Wu, T.; et al. OsPPR6, a pentatricopeptide repeat protein involved in editing and splicing chloroplast RNA, is required for chloroplast biogenesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 95, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Okuda, K.; Myouga, F.; Motohashi, R.; Shinozaki, K.; Shikanai, T. Conserved domain structure of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins involved in chloroplast RNA editing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8178–8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Okuda, K.; Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L.; Nakamura, T.; Delannoy, E.; Sugita, M.; Myouga, F.; Motohashi, R.; Shinozaki, K.; Small, I.; Shikanai, T. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins with the DYW motif have distinct molecular functions in RNA Editing and RNA Cleavage in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. O’Toole, N.; Hattori, M.; Andres, C.; Iida, K.; Lurin, C.; Schmitz-Linneweber, C.; Sugita, M.; Small, I. On the expansion of the pentatricopeptide repeat gene family in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1120–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Boussardon, C.; Salone, V.; Avon, A.; Berthome, R.; Hammani, K.; Okuda, K.; Shikanai, T.; Small, I.; Lurin, C. Two interacting proteins are necessary for the editing of the NdhD-1 Site in Arabidopsis plastids. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3684–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Chateigner-Boutin, A.-L.; Francs-Small, C.; Fujii, S.; Okuda, K.; Tanz, S.K.; Small, I. The E domains of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins from different organelles are not functionally equivalent for RNA editing. Plant J. 2013, 74, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hayes, M.L.; Giang, K.; Berhane, B.; Mulligan, R.M. Identification of two pentatricopeptide repeat genes required for RNA editing and zinc binding by C-Terminal cytidine deaminase-like Domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 36519–36529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Schallenberg-Rudinger, M.; Kindgren, P.; Zehrmann, A.; Small, I.; Knoop, V. A DYW-protein knockout in Physcomitrella affects two closely spaced mitochondrial editing sites and causes a severe developmental phenotype. Plant J. 2013, 76, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Wagoner, J.A.; Sun, T.; Lin, L.; Hanson, M.R. Cytidine deaminase motifs within the DYW domain of two pentatricopeptide repeat-containing proteins are required for site-specific chloroplast RNA Editing. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 2957–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Laluk, K.; Abuqamar, S.; Mengiste, T. The Arabidopsis mitochondrialocalized pentatricopeptide repeat rrotein PGN functions in defense against necrotrophic fungi and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 2053–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Jiao, X.; Wang, H.; Yan, J.; Kong, X.; Liu, Y.; Chu, J.; Chen, X.; Fang, R.; Yan, Y. Promotion of BR biosynthesis by miR444 is required for ammonium triggered inhibition of root growth. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 1454–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yan, Y.; Wang, H.; Hamera, S.; Chen, X.; Fang, R. MiR444a has multiple functions in the rice nitrate-signaling pathway. Plant J. 2014, 78, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Zhou, R.; Sanz-Jimenez, P.; Zhu, X.; Feng, J.; Shao, L.; Song, J.; Chen, L. Analysis of rice transcriptome reveals the LncRNA/CircRNA regulation in tissue development. Rice 2021, 28, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Wang, M.; Weiberg, A.; Lin, F.; Thomma, B.; Huang, H.; Jin, H. Bidirectional cross-kingdom RNAi and fungal uptake of external RNAs confer plant protection. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Functional osa-miRNAs related to the immune response against M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani. The identified osa-miRNAs are shown to directly or indirectly activate various biological processes related to PTI and ETI. These processes include the accumulation of ROS, callose deposition, the expression of defense-related genes, the regulation of plant hormones, and the modulation of DNA methylation, all of which contribute to the regulation of rice immunity. Solid arrows indicate direct regulation of immune signaling components and their downstream responses, while dashed arrows signify indirect or unknown regulatory mechanisms.
Figure 1. Functional osa-miRNAs related to the immune response against M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani. The identified osa-miRNAs are shown to directly or indirectly activate various biological processes related to PTI and ETI. These processes include the accumulation of ROS, callose deposition, the expression of defense-related genes, the regulation of plant hormones, and the modulation of DNA methylation, all of which contribute to the regulation of rice immunity. Solid arrows indicate direct regulation of immune signaling components and their downstream responses, while dashed arrows signify indirect or unknown regulatory mechanisms.
Plants 14 00136 g001
Figure 2. Summary of known osa-miRNA-mediated defense mechanisms in rice against M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani. Osa-miRNAs highlighted in red and blue represent positively and negatively regulated miRNAs, respectively.
Figure 2. Summary of known osa-miRNA-mediated defense mechanisms in rice against M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani. Osa-miRNAs highlighted in red and blue represent positively and negatively regulated miRNAs, respectively.
Plants 14 00136 g002
Table 1. List of osa-miRNAs responsive to M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani.
Table 1. List of osa-miRNAs responsive to M. oryzae, Xoo, and R. solani.
Pathogensosa-miRNAsTarget GenesRoleReferences
M. oryzaeosa-miR169OsNF-YA2Negative[40]
osa-miR167dOsARF12Negative[41]
osa-miR171bOsSCL6-IIa, OsSCL6-IIb, OsSCL6-IIcPositive[42]
osa-miR319OsTCP21Negative[43]
osa-miR535OsSPL4Negative[44]
osa-miR160aOsARF8Positive[45,46]
osa-miR164aOsNAC60Negative[47]
osa-miR156fhlOsSPL14Negative[48]
osa-miR398bOsCSD1, OsCSD2,
OsSODX, OsCCSD
Positive[46]
[49]
osa-miR7695OsNramp6Positive[50]
[51]
[52]
osa-miR166h-166kOsEIN2Positive[53]
osa-miR396OsGRF6, OsGRF7,
OsGRF8, OsGRF9
Negative[54]
osa-miR162aOsDCL1Positive[55]
osa-miR168OsAGO1Negative[56]
osa-miR1875OsHXK1Negative[57]
osa-miR812wOsACO3, OsCIPK10, OsLRRPositive[58]
osa-miR1873LOC_Os05g01790Negative[59]
osa-miR159aOsGAMYB, OsGAMYBL, OsZFPositive[60]
osa-miR1871OsMFAP1Negative[61]
osa-miR439LOC_Os01g23940, LOC_Os01g36270Negative[62]
osa-miR530OsDHFR-TSNegative[63]
osa-miR1432OsEFH1, OsACOTNegative[64]
Xooosa-miR160aOsARF8Positive[45]
osa-miR156OsSPL14 (IPA1),
OsSPL7
Negative[65]
osa-miRNA156/529OsSPL7/14/17Negative[66]
osa-miR169oOsNF-YA1,
OsNF-YA4
Negative[67]
osa-miR1876OsNBS8R
OsNBS8S
Negative[68]
osa-miR159bOsGAMYBPositive[69]
osa-miR164aOsNAC60Negative[69]
osa-miR167dOsWD40-174Negative[69]
osa-miR1432OsCaML2Positive[70]
osa-miR395OsAPS1,
OsSULTR2;1, OsSULTR2;2
Positive[71]
osa-miR2118LOC_Os08g42700.1, LOC_Os01g05600.1,
LOC_Os12g37290.1
Negative[72]
R. solaniosa-miR160aOsARF8Positive[45]
osa-miR395aOs12t0109300Negative[73]
osa-miR444.2-Negative[74]
This list only includes the miRNAs that are functionally characterized.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, Y.; Wei, K.; Qin, J.; Zhai, W.; Li, Q.; Li, Y. The Roles of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Rice–Pathogen Interactions. Plants 2025, 14, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010136

AMA Style

Jia Y, Wei K, Qin J, Zhai W, Li Q, Li Y. The Roles of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Rice–Pathogen Interactions. Plants. 2025; 14(1):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Yanfeng, Kai Wei, Jiawang Qin, Wenxue Zhai, Quanlin Li, and Yalan Li. 2025. "The Roles of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Rice–Pathogen Interactions" Plants 14, no. 1: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010136

APA Style

Jia, Y., Wei, K., Qin, J., Zhai, W., Li, Q., & Li, Y. (2025). The Roles of MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Rice–Pathogen Interactions. Plants, 14(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop