Next Article in Journal
Occurrence of Nine Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Senecio vulgaris L. Depending on Developmental Stage and Season
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Analysis of the Chitinase Family Genes in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 8
Issue 3
10.3390/plants8030053
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Transcriptomic and GC-MS Metabolomic Analysis to Characterize Color and Aroma Formation during Tepal Development in Lycoris longituba

by
Yuanzheng Yue
1,
Jiawei Liu
1,
Tingting Shi
1,
Min Chen
1,
Ya Li
1,
Juhua Du
1,
Haiyan Jiang
1,
Xiulian Yang
1,
Huirong Hu
3 and
Lianggui Wang
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Landscape Architecture, Jiangsu Province, College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8030053
Submission received: 7 February 2019 / Revised: 22 February 2019 / Accepted: 25 February 2019 / Published: 28 February 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lycoris longituba, belonging to the Amaryllidaceae family, is a perennial bulb bearing flowers with diverse colors and fragrance. Selection of cultivars with excellent colored and scented flowers has always been the breeding aim for ornamental plants. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying color fading and aroma production during flower expansion in L. longituba remain unclear. Therefore, to systematically investigate these important biological phenomena, the tepals of L. longituba from different developmental stages were used to screen and analyze the metabolic components and relevant genes. Utilizing the Illumina platform, a total of 144,922 unigenes were obtained from the RNA-Seq libraries. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis indicated that the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways might play important roles during color and aroma changes. Metabolomic analysis identified 29 volatile organic components (VOCs) from different developmental stages of L. longituba tepals, and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) revealed that trans-β-ocimene—a terpene—was the most important aroma compound. Meanwhile, we found the content of anthocyanin was significantly reduced during the tepal color fading process. Then, we identified two dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) and three terpene synthase (TPS) genes, for which expression changes coincided with the production patterns of anthocyanins and trans-β-ocimene, respectively. Furthermore, a number of MYB and bHLH transcription factors (TFs) which might be involved in color- and aroma-formation were also identified in L. longituba tepal transcriptomes. Taken together, this is the first comprehensive report of the color and fragrance in tepals of L. longituba and these results could be helpful in understanding these characteristics and their regulation networks.

1. Introduction

Lycoris longituba, commonly known as Chinese tulip, is a bulbiferous species of the Amaryllidaceae family and distributed in central eastern China [1]. It can tolerate extremes of drought, waterlogging and shade, as well as poor soil conditions. Its plentiful flower colors, large tepals, elegant fragrance, and some medicinal potential make it a popular ornamental plant [2].
Flower color and fragrance are two critical factors in attracting pollinators; the various colors and particular scents are also key ornamental traits within landscape plants [3,4]. The coloration of the plant flowers is mainly attributed to the accumulation of anthocyanins that belong to a class of plant flavonoid metabolites, which are the most common pigments and best studied compounds in plants [5,6,7]. Many enzymes can catalyze anthocyanin synthesis, especially dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), which can directly increase anthocyanin accumulation and lead to the flower formation when heterologously expressed in tobacco [4]. The activity of anthocyanin biosynthesis enzymes is usually regulated by the MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex which consists of different classes of transcription factors of R2R3-MYB, basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH), and WD40-repeat [8,9]. In Phalaenopsis spp., PeMYB11 could regulate variegated pigmentation of tepals by controlling the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes [10]. In Malus domestica, Fragaria chiloensis, and grapevine, the MdMYB10, FcMYB1, and VvMybPA2 have been demonstrated to regulate the accumulation of anthocyanins/proanthocyanidins of fruits [11,12,13]. Additionally, the MYB transcription factors TT2, bHLH transcription factors TT8, and the WD40 repeat protein TTG1 could also influence anthocyanin biosynthesis by regulating downstream gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana [14].
Floral fragrance is made up of specialized volatile metabolites such as terpenoids, phenylpropanoids (including benzenoids), and fatty acid derivatives. The content changes of these volatile components in the blend could directly lead to distinct scents [15]. Terpenoids are the largest class of floral fragrances and have been taken as the critical members of aroma compounds [16,17]. Up to now, many terpene synthase genes (TPSs) have been isolated in various species [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Meanwhile, some scent-related transcription factors (TFs) which could regulate the expression of TPSs and floral scent formation have also been identified, such as AtMYC2 in Arabidopsis thaliana [24], HcMYB1 and HcMYB2 in Hedychium coronarium [25], AaNAC2, AaNAC3, and AaNAC4 in Actinidia arguta [26], and CitERF71 in Citrus sinensis [27]. However, neither the composition of floral scent nor the scent-related gene in L. longituba is available.
In previous work, four critical anthocyanins in different colors of L. longituba tepals have been well identified from 44 floral color natural variants, and the different amounts of these anthocyanin components were demonstrated as the important determinants for the natural variation of flower colors in L. longituba [1]. A previous study identified 4992 ESTs of L. longituba from a mixed floral bud library [28]. To date, a total of 338 putative TFs were identified from three floral tissue EST libraries of L. longituba, which could significantly contribute to the further analysis of florescence progress [2]. However, due to technical limitations, the TFs obtained from the above research were insufficient, and the overall molecular regulation mechanisms involved in floral development still need to be investigated. It has been verified that the genome of Lycoris is very large (>20 Gb) [29]. In absence of a complete genome sequence, RNA-Seq technology could be taken as the most effective and economical tool for the whole genome transcriptome analysis. Until now, this strategy has been successfully used in exploring the molecular mechanism of leaf color change in Paeonia suffruticosa [7], fruit color change/peel color mutant in Myrica rubra and Ficus carica [30,31], petal color change/spot formation in Prunus persica [32], and tepal color/bicolor development in Lilium ‘Sorbonne’ [33]. Recently, the aroma biosynthesis regulation mechanism has also been well characterized by sequencing the flower samples in Chimonanthus praecox and Osmanthus fragrans [18,34].
L. longituba is a special aromatic species of Lycoris, and the red color of tepals will gradually shade with the expansion of flowers. In this study, a comparative transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis was carried out using the tepals from different developmental stages of L. longituba based on Illumina sequencing and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The critical pathways, as well as structural genes and transcription factors that related to color fading and aroma formation of L. longituba tepals were systematically identified, which would help to advance the knowledge and provide a more sufficient genetic resource for further exploration of the molecular regulation mechanism of tepals’ color and fragrance changes in L. longituba.

2. Results

2.1. Anthocyanin Level in the Different Tepal Development Stages of Lycoris longituba

In the small bud stage, the red color of L. longituba ‘Pink’ tepal was very deep, and then the color intensity was significantly decreased with the rapid elongation of tepals, as shown in Figure 1a. In contrast, the tepal color of L. longituba ‘White’ was always white, as shown in Figure 1a. As shown in Figure 1b, the anthocyanin content in L. longituba ‘Pink’ was dramatically reduced from S1-P to S3-P, and nearly no anthocyanin was detected in S3-W, as shown in Figure 1b. These results suggested that content changes of anthocyanin could be the main reason that led to the tepals’ red color fading of L. longituba ‘Pink’.

2.2. Transcriptome Sequencing and de Novo Assembly

Twelve total RNA samples were isolated from different L. longituba tepal developmental stages S1-P, S2-P, S3-P, and S3-W. These RNA samples were at concentrations of about 200–500 ng/μL with OD260/280 ≥ 1.9 and the RNA Integrity Numbers (RINs) of 8.6–10.0 were used for cDNA library construction. The Illumina HiSeqTM 4000 platform was used to obtain the dataset of 12 cDNA libraries. About 663.25 million raw sequencing reads with a length of 150 bp were generated, and after discarding the low-quality reads, we obtained about 85.23% (565.28 million) clean reads. For all 12 samples, the quality score above 20 (Q20) was ~98.20% and the GC percentages were 45.55–46.88%. Using Trinity software, the de novo assembly totally generated 144,922 unigenes, of average length 941 bp, from the twelve tepal transcriptomes, as shown in Table 1. In this research, the N50 was determined to be 1527 bp, which indicated that the quality of sequence assembly was good. All raw high throughput sequence data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Reads Archive (SRA) with the accession number PRJNA490415.

2.3. Functional Classification of Genes during Tepal Development Stages

The assembled unigenes were annotated using blastx against NCBI nonredundant protein (Nr), Swiss-Prot, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) protein sequence databases with an E-value ≤10−5. A total of 85,563 (59.04%) unigenes could be annotated while other unigenes had no significant BLAST hit, as shown in Table 2, indicating that numerous new genes specific to L. longituba are still functionally unknown and need to be further studied in the future. Remarkably, the plant species with the top three numbers of blastx hits were Elaeis guineensis (23,200 transcripts; 29.62%), Phoenix dactylifera (19,045 transcripts; 24.31%), and Musa acuminata (6512 transcripts; 8.31%), as shown in Table S1. These results implied that the assembled L. longituba transcripts shared similarity with transcripts from several monocotyledons and were reliable. Based on sequence homology, gene ontology (GO) assignment analysis was performed. Of the 85,563 annotated unigenes, 44,813 (52.37%) sequences were assigned into three main categories (biological process, cellular components, and molecular function), which could be further distributed under 58 GO terms, as shown in Figure S1. Metabolic process, cell, and catalytic activity were the most highly enriched GO terms in biological process, cellular components, and molecular function categories, respectively.

2.4. Identify Differentially Expressed Unigenes between Tepal Transcriptomes

To identify differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) during tepal color fading, the unigenes that were differentially expressed between developmental stages and opening tepals with different colors were compared and shown in Figure 2. Among the four comparisons, the smallest number of DEGs was between the S1-P and S2-P libraries (4674), of which 2330 were up-regulated and 2344 were down-regulated, and the largest number of DEGs was between the S3-P and S3-W libraries (9958), with 5786 up-regulated and 5463 down-regulated unigenes. As the tepals faded from S2-P to S3-P, 8110 unigenes were differentially expressed, with 3526 up-regulated and 4584 down-regulated unigenes. In the S1-P vs. S3-P comparison, 11,024 DEGs were detected, including 5335 up-regulated and 5689 down-regulated unigenes. The comparison between S1-P and the other tepal developmental stages (S2-P and S3-P) showed that the number of up and down-regulated unigenes were both significantly increased as the tepals developed.

2.5. KEGG Pathway Enrichment

According to KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (p-value < 0.05), the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (96 DEGs, ko00940), flavonoid biosynthesis (58 DEGs, ko00941), flavone and flavonol biosynthesis (23 DEGs, ko00944), and anthocyanin biosynthesis (4 DEG, ko00942) pathways which related to color formation were significantly different as compared to S3-P and S3-W. Interestingly, except for the anthocyanin biosynthesis and flavonol biosynthesis pathways, the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways were also identified in the S1-P vs. S2-P, S2-P vs. S3-P, and S1-P vs. S3-P comparisons. These results suggested that the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways could play critical roles during red color fading and aroma formation. The statistically enriched pathways between each two transcriptomes are shown in Figure S2.

2.6. Validation of the Gene Expression Profiles by qRT-PCR

To validate the transcription profile revealed by RNA-Seq data, the expression levels of 21 genes from the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway were also assessed using qRT-PCR, as shown in Figure 3a. Linear regression analysis was used to obtain the overall correlation coefficient between RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR data, which showed a good correlation (R = 0.89) between these two data, as shown in Figure 3b, indicating that the 12 transcriptomics data were reliable.

2.7. Metabolome Analysis of Lycoris longituba Tepal Development Stages by GC-MS

To investigate the volatile metabolic components changes of L. longituba tepals in the opening processes, we obtained the GC-MS total ion current (TIC) chromatograms for nine L. longituba tepal samples from three typical developmental stages (S1-P, S2-P, and S3-P), as shown in Figure 1a. The obvious differences of chromatographic peaks were observed between sample groups, and the retention times were fairly consistent and reproducible, as shown in Figure 4a. In this study, a total of 29 metabolites were identified in our sample libraries across all samples, as shown in Table 3.
To assess the volatile components profile changes during L. longituba tepal development, the orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) plot was generated from the GC-MS metabolite data of S1-P, S2-P, and S3-P tepals and showed clear metabolic differences between two stages. Remarkably, S1-P, S2-P, and S3-P tepals could be completely separated sufficiently by use of two principal components. The first principle component (PC1, accounting for 49.89%) and the second component (PC2, accounting for 32.96%) of the variation in the data could separate all three types of tepals with no outliers, as shown in Figure 4b. The contribution of each variable to PC1 and PC2 was also calculated by giving each variable a weight value. The top two core differential metabolites of PC1 and PC2 discrimination were caryophyllene and trans-β-ocimene, as shown in Figure 4c. Interestingly, the trans-β-ocimene, which had a high content in S3-P, was not detected in S1-P and S2-P, as shown in Table 3.

2.8. Analysis of Candidate Genes Related to Color and Fragrance Metabolics

To explore the genetic regulation of L. longituba tepal color fading and aroma emission, the genes which have been reported to be involved in these two metabolic pathways were selected. With the development of tepals, several anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes had the lowest expression levels in S3-P, such as the DFRs, CHIs, CHS2, F3’H1, and FLSs, as shown in Figure 3a. Especially, the DFR-annotated unigenes (DFR2-1 and DFR2-2) which had more than a 7-fold down-regulated expression level in S1-P vs. S3-P, as shown in Figure 3a. Five TPS genes were also identified from the DEGs, and interestingly three (Unigene81776, CL6106.Contig2, and Unigene3859) of them were predominantly expressed in S3-P, as shown in Figure 5c.
The spatial and temporal expression of pigment structural and aroma genes were usually controlled by transcription factors from MYB and bHLH [14,25]. In this study, 35 MYBs and 29 bHLHs with fragments per kilobase per million fragments (FPKM) ≥ 5 were identified from DEGs, as shown in Figure 5a,b. Among them, six MYBs and four bHLHs (in black frames) had the similar down-regulated expression trends with DFR2-1 and DFR2-2, and four MYBs and one bHLH (in red frames) had the similar up-regulated expression patterns with the above three TPSs, as shown in Figure 5.

3. Discussion

Flower color and fragrance are considered to be two critical characters that influence plants’ ornamental value and insect pollination. The pigmentation and aroma formation processes involve multiple gene expression networks and complex biochemical pathways. However, the underlying molecular regulation mechanism of flower color fading and fragrance synthesis in L. longituba remains to be uncovered. To date, transcriptome sequencing technology has been widely used in exploring the critical metabolic pathways and functional genes that are involved in color biosynthesis and aroma formation in various species, even those that lack reference genomes. In this study, the tepal transcriptomes in small bud, medium bud, and opening stages of L. longituba were compared. The phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, and flavone and flavonol biosynthesis pathways which related to the color and aroma formation were highlighted between each two transcriptomes by KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, as shown in Figure S2. This result implied that these pathways could play critical roles in the two ornamental characters formation in L. longituba tepals.
It has been demonstrated that the different content of anthocyanidin was a critical reason for red color alteration in plant organs [9,35]. In this research, tepal color was altered from deep red to pink accompanying L. longituba flower bud development, as shown in Figure 1a. Remarkably, the anthocyanidin level of the tepal was significantly reduced during the color fading processes, as shown in Figure 1b. This result suggested that the decreasing of anthocyanidin accumulation could be the directly responsible for the color fading of L. longituba.
Dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR), which is a downstream enzyme in anthocyanin biosynthesis, could regulate the critical rate-limiting step of anthocyanin biosynthesis processes by catalyzing dihydroflavonols to leucoanthocyanidins [4,36]. Recently, a series of DFR gene homologs have been identified in various plant species such as in Rosa rugosa [4], Camellia sinensis [37], Populus trichocarpa [38], and Calibrachoa hybrida [39]. The previous works have confirmed that overexpression of DFR genes within tobacco and petunia could accelerate the anthocyanin accumulation and promote the red coloration of flowers [4,39]. Here, two LlDFRs (DFR2-1 and DFR2-2) were isolated from DEGs. Both of them had the highest expression levels in the S1-P stage (deep red bud), then significantly reduced in the S2-P stage (pink red bud), which were positively correlated with the content variation trend of anthocyanins in L. longituba tepals, as shown in Figure 1b and Figure 3a. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expressions of anthocyanin biosynthesis structural genes are controlled by the MYB, bHLH, and WD40 transcription factors [40], such as PhAN11 in Petunia hybrida [41], PeMYB11 in Phalaenopsis spp. [10], MdMYB10 and MdbHLH3 in Malus domestica [11,42], CmMYB6 in Chrysanthemum [43], AtMYBL2 in Arabidopsis thaliana [44], FaMYB1 in Fragaria ananassa [45], as well as PpMYB16 and PpMYB111 in Prunus persica [46]. In this study, several MYB and bHLH genes, which had similar expression patterns with anthocyanidins and DFR genes, were identified in these transcriptomes, as shown in Figure 5. This evidence indicated that the down-regulated expression of DFR genes during the tepal developmental processes might be controlled by the above transcription factors, and these TFs could directly control the flower color fading.
Recently, GC–MS technology has been successfully used to analyze qualitative and quantitative differences in aroma-related metabolomics, and some important volatile terpenes which play dominant roles in the floral scent formation have been well demonstrated, such as in Lilium [47], Chimonanthus praecox [18], and Osmanthus fragans [19]. Here, a total of 29 floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 6 volatile terpenes were identified from three developmental stages of L. longituba tepals, as shown in Figure 4. In previous studies, linalool has been verified as one of the critical aroma metabolites in various plants [18,19]. Conversely, linalool was undetected in the tepals of L. longituba, as shown in Table 3, which indicated that the composition of L. longituba floral aroma could be very particular. Interestingly, some VOCs were specifically emitted in the different stages; especially the trans-β-ocimene and β-myrcene which belong to the monoterpenes, which were only detected in the strongest aroma period of opening flowers, as shown in Table 3. Meanwhile, OPLS-DA loading values showed that the top two critical components were caryophyllene and trans-β-ocimene, as shown in Figure 4c, and the content of trans-β-ocimene was much higher than caryophyllene in the full-blooming floral tepals (S3-P), as shown in Table 3. Taken together, we concluded that the trans-β-ocimene could be the most important aroma compound during the L. longituba floral fragrance emission.
It has been demonstrated that the TPSs could control the β-ocimene biosynthesis at the transcriptional level [48,49,50]. In this study, the expression patterns of three TPSs were in excellent agreement with the emission trend of trans-β-ocimene in L. longituba tepals, as shown in Figure 5c and Table 3, implying that the three TPS members might directly influence the protein abundance of ocimene synthase. Some members of the MYB and bHLH families have also been confirmed that could control the floral aroma formation, such as the CpMYC2 [18], AtMYC2 [24], HcMYB1, and HcMYB2 [25]. In this research, several MYB and bHLH genes which had the consistent expression patterns with trans-β-ocimene and TPS genes were identified, as shown in Figure 5a,b, suggesting that these genes could be involved in the regulation of aroma formation.
The color fading and aroma formation during the L. longituba tepal development could be two very complex and dynamic processes. While many candidate genes have been identified in this work, the functions of these members still need to be investigated in our future studies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Plants of L. longituba ‘Pink’ and ‘White’ were grown in the Lycoris Experimental Plantation of Nanjing Forestry University in Nanjing, China. The L. longituba tepals of three typical developmental stages were selected based on tepal length, which were S1-P (15 ± 5 mm tepals at small bud stage), S2-P (55 ± 5 mm tepals at medium bud stage), S3-P (90 ± 5 mm tepals at opening stage) of ‘Pink’, and S3-W (90 ± 5 mm tepals at opening stage) of ‘White’, as shown in Figure 1a. At each stage, the fresh samples of tepals were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 ºC.

4.2. Anthocyanin Level Measurement

Freeze-dried tepals were finely ground and 0.2 g was extracted with 2 mL acidic methanol (0.1% hydrochloric acid) at 4 ºC in darkness for 12 h, mixing the extract up and down every 6 h. Then, the extract was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was diluted 4 times with acidic methanol, and the absorbances were tested spectrophotometrically at 530 and 657 nm. Finally, total anthocyanin was defined using the equation: Q = (A530 − 0.25 × A657) × FW − 1, where Q = total anthocyanins; A530 = absorption at 530 nm; A657 = absorption at 657 nm; FW = fresh weight of tepals (g). Three biological replicates were performed for each group.

4.3. RNA-Seq and de Novo Assembly

Total RNA from three biological replicates was independently isolated from the tepals of L. longituba using RNAiso Reagent (Takara, Otsu, Japan) according to the previously described method [51]. The RIN value of total RNA sample was examined with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and the concentration was assessed using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Twelve cDNA libraries which consisted of separate RNA samples from L. longituba ‘Pink’ tepals of three different developmental stages (S1-P, S2-P, and S3-P) and L. longituba ‘White’ tepals (S3-W) were prepared using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Firstly, the enriched mRNA were fragmented into short fragments and reverse transcripted into first-strand cDNA. Then after second-strand cDNA synthesis, end repair, adapter ligation, and PCR amplification, the cDNA library products were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeqTM 4000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) instrument using paired-end sequencing technology by staff at Gene Denovo Biotechnology Corporation (Guangzhou, China). After the raw reads removing the adapter sequences, reads with more than 20% low-quality bases (quality value <20) and ambiguous nucleotides (denoted with an “N” in the sequence trace) of the raw reads, the high-quality clean reads were accomplished assembled using Trinity software [52]. In order to avoid the interference of alternative splicing transcripts, only the longest transcript was taken as the unigene in this research.

4.4. Sequence Annotation and Gene Expression Difference Analysis

The assembled unigenes functional annotations were performed through a blastx search against four public protein databases including NCBI nonredundant protein (Nr), Swiss-Prot, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) of proteins, with an E-value of less than 1e-5. The Blast2GO software (http://blast2go.bioinfo.cipf.es/) was used to acquire GO terms of the unigenes.
The expression level of unigenes was calculated using fragments per kilobase per million fragments mapped (FPKM) method [53]. In this study, the false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.001 and the absolute value of log2Ratio ≥ 2 were taken as the threshold for significantly differential expression of unigenes. All differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) were mapped to the KEGG pathway database and the numbers of unigenes for every KEGG Orthology (KO) term were calculated. Significantly enriched KO terms from the set of DEGs were identified by comparing the observed DEG count to the expected count of the genes involved in a given pathway with a random distribution of the L. longituba tepal transcriptome using the formula of the hypergeometric test [54].

4.5. qRT-PCR Analysis

Using TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix kit (Transgene, Beijing, China), 2 µg of total RNA was reverse transcripted to the first-strand cDNA on the basis of the manufacturer’s instructions. The SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM Ⅱ kit (Takara) was used to perform qRT-PCR in the ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Applied Biosystems, Cheshire, UK according to the manual’s description [55]. The relative expression level of genes was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method. To ensure reliability, the expression data of each gene was obtained from three independent biological replications (each biological replication included three technical replications). The data are shown as mean values ± SE (standard error). All primer pairs were designed by Primer 5 software and listed in Table S2, and the specificity of them was assessed by the sequencing of amplified qRT-PCR products. The ELF gene was used as an internal reference control [56].

4.6. GC-MS Analysis

Fresh tepals at three different stages (S1-P, S2-P, and S3-P), defined by the size of the flower as shown in Figure 1a, were picked from the plants at the same time as samples that were collected for the above transcriptome studies. Sampling was replicated four times, and the samples were quickly put into polyethylene bags impermeable to gases, kept in the ice-box, and analyzed immediately. Headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) combined with GC-MS was used to determine the identity and quantity of the fragrance volatiles. Tepals (0.3 g) were placed in a 4 mL solid-phase microextraction vial (Supelco Inc, Bellefonte, PA, USA), 1 μL of 1000x diluted ethyl caprate (Macklin Inc, Shanghai, China) was added, and vials were capped with a 65 µm DB-5 ms extraction head (Supelco Inc). The oven temperature was programmed at 60 °C for 2 min, increasing at 5 °C/min to 150 °C, then increasing at 10 °C/min to reach 250 °C, followed by maintaining the temperature of the transfer line at 250 °C and helium was used as the carrier gas at a linear velocity of 1.0 mL/min. Mass detector conditions on MS were carried out according to our previous method [57]. The quantities of the volatile aroma compounds were calculated by normalizing the peak-areas and volatile compounds were first identified using the NIST98 database (Agilent). SIMCA-P 11.5 software (Umetrics AB, Umea, Sweden) was selected to test the differences in the metabolite levels of L. longituba tepals from different developmental stages by orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/3/53/s1. Figure S1: GO classification of DEGs among different samples in L. longituba, Figure S2: The KEGG enrichment of DEGs among the different samples, Table S1: Species distribution of the BLAST hits for all homologous sequences, Table S2: Primers used for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y. and L.W.; Methodology, Y.Y.; Software, Y.Y., J.L., and M.C.; Validation, J.D., Y.L., and Y.Y.; Formal Analysis, H.J.; Data Curation, Y.Y.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, Y.Y.; Writing-Review & Editing, Y.Y. and H.H.; Visualization, Y.L.; Supervision, L.W.; Project Administration, Y.Y. and X.Y.; Funding Acquisition, L.W.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31601785), the Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PPZY2015A063), the Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates of Jiangsu Province (201710298032Z).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, Q.L.; Shen, Y.; Wang, M.X.; Huang, M.R.; Yang, R.Z.; Zhu, S.J.; Wang, L.S.; Xu, Y.J.; Wu, R.L. Natural variation in petal color in Lycoris longituba revealed by anthocyanin components. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. He, Q.L.; Cui, S.J.; Gu, J.L.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M.X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Huang, M.R. Analysis of floral transcription factors from Lycoris longituba. Genomics 2010, 96, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shrestha, M.; Dyer, A.G.; Boyd-Gerny, S.; Wong, B.B.M.; Burd, M. Shades of red: Bird-pollinated flowers target the specific colour discrimination abilities of avian vision. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Luo, P.; Ning, G.G.; Wang, Z.; Shen, Y.X.; Jin, H.A.; Li, P.H.; Huang, S.S.; Zhao, J.; Bao, M.Z. Disequilibrium of flavonol synthase and dihydroflavonol-4-reductase expression associated tightly to White vs. Red color flower formation in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tanaka, Y.; Ohmiya, A. Seeing is believing: Engineering anthocyanin and carotenoid biosynthetic pathways. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2008, 19, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Morita, Y.; Takagi, K.; Fukuchi-Mizutani, M.; Ishiguro, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Nitasaka, E.; Nakayama, M.; Saito, N.; Kagami, T.; Hoshino, A.; et al. A chalcone isomerase-like protein enhances flavonoid production and flower pigmentation. Plant J. 2014, 78, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Luo, J.R.; Shi, Q.Q.; Niu, L.X.; Zhang, Y.L. Transcriptomic analysis of leaf in tree peony reveals differentially expressed pigments genes. Molecules 2017, 22, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ramsay, N.A.; Glover, B.J. MYB-bHLH-WD40 protein complex and the evolution of cellular diversity. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Petroni, K.; Tonelli, C. Recent advances on the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in reproductive organs. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsu, C.C.; Chen, Y.Y.; Tsai, W.C.; Chen, W.H.; Chen, H.H. Three R2R3-MYB transcription factors regulate distinct floral pigmentation patterning in Phalaenopsis spp. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Espley, R.V.; Hellens, R.P.; Putterill, J.; Stevenson, D.E.; Kutty-Amma, S.; Allan, A.C. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 2007, 49, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Terrier, N.; Torregrosa, L.; Ageorges, A.; Vialet, S.; Verriès, C.; Cheynier, V.; Romieu, C. Ectopic expression of VvMybPA2 promotes proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in grapevine and suggests additional targets in the pathway. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1028–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Salvatierra, A.; Pimentel, P.; Moya-Leon, M.A.; Herrera, R. Increased accumulation of anthocyanins in Fragaria chiloensis fruits by transient suppression of FcMYB1 gene. Phytochemistry 2013, 90, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Saito, K.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Nakabayashi, R.; Higashi, Y.; Yamazaki, M.; Tohge, T.; Fernie, A.R. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis: Structural and genetic diversity. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 72, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Stahl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72, 1–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Muhlemann, J.K.; Klempien, A.; Dudareva, N. Floral volatiles: From biosynthesis to function. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 1936–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tian, J.P.; Ma, Z.Y.; Zhao, K.G.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, L.; Chen, L.Q. Transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to explore the differences in monoterpene and benzenoid biosynthesis between scented and unscented genotypes of wintersweet. Physiol. Plant. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, X.L.; Yue, Y.Z.; Li, H.Y.; Ding, W.J.; Chen, G.W.; Shi, T.T.; Chen, J.H.; Park, M.S.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.G. The chromosome-level quality genome provides insights into the evolution of the biosynthesis genes for aroma compounds of Osmanthus fragrans. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nagegowda, D.A.; Gutensohn, M.; Wilkerson, C.G.; Dudareva, N. Two nearly identical terpene synthases catalyze the formation of nerolidol and linalool in snapdragon flowers. Plant J. 2008, 55, 224–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Green, S.A.; Chen, X.Y.; Bailleul, E.J.D.; Matich, A.J.; Wang, M.Y.; Atkinson, R.G. Functional genomics reveals that a compact terpene synthase gene family can account for terpene volatile production in apple. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Wang, M.Y.; Matich, A.J.; Green, S.A.; Chen, X.Y.; Yauk, Y.K.; Beuning, L.L.; Nagegowda, D.A.; Dudareva, N.; Atkinson, R.G. Two terpene synthases are responsible for the major sesquiterpenes emitted from the flowers of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3203–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yue, Y.C.; Yu, R.C.; Fan, Y.P. Characterization of two monoterpene synthases involved in floral scent formation in Hedychium coronarium. Planta 2014, 240, 745–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hong, G.J.; Xue, X.Y.; Mao, Y.B.; Wang, L.J.; Chen, X.Y. Arabidopsis MYC2 interacts with DELLA proteins in regulating sesquiterpene synthase gene expression. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2635–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yue, Y.C.; Yu, R.C.; Fan, Y.P. Transcriptome profiling provides new insights into the formation of floral scent in Hedychium coronarium. BMC Genomics 2015, 16, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nieuwenhuizen, N.J.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, M.Y.; Matich, A.J.; Perez, R.L.; Allan, A.C.; Green, S.A.; Atkinson, R.G. Natural variation in monoterpene synthesis in Kiwifruit: Transcriptional regulation of terpene synthases by NAC and ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3-Like transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1243–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, X.; Xu, Y.Y.; Shen, S.L.; Yin, X.R.; Klee, H.; Zhang, B.; Chen, K.S. Transcription factor CitERF71 activates the terpene synthase gene CitTPS16 involved in the synthesis of E-geraniol in sweet orange fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 4929–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cui, Y.L.; Zhang, X.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.; Tao, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhuge, Q.; Cai, Y.M.; Huang, M.R. Identification and expression analysis of EST-based genes in the bud of Lycoris longituba. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf. 2004, 2, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zonneveld, B.J.M.; Leitch, I.J.; Bennett, M.D. First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 angiosperms. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, Z.R.; Cui, Y.Y.; Vainstein, A.; Chen, S.W.; Ma, H.Q. Regulation of fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit folor: Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Feng, C.; Chen, M.; Xu, C.J.; Bai, L.; Yin, X.R.; Li, X.; Allan, A.C.; Ferguson, L.B.; Chen, K.S. Transcriptomic analysis of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) fruit development and ripening using RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, Y.N.; Mao, Y.; Liu, H.L.; Yu, F.X.; Li, S.X.; Yin, T.M. Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes relevant to variegation in peach flowers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, M.F.; Jiang, L.M.; Zhang, D.M.; Jia, G.X. De novo transcriptome characterization of Lilium ‘Sorbonne’ and key enzymes related to the flavonoid biosynthesis. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2015, 290, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, L.F.; Yang, P.P.; Feng, Y.Y.; Xu, H.; Cao, Y.W.; Tang, Y.C.; Yuan, S.X.; Liu, X.Y.; Ming, J. Spatiotemporal transcriptome analysis provides insights into bicolor tepal development in Lilium “Tiny Padhye”. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lin, L.; Mu, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, G. Transcriptomic analysis of purple leaf determination in birch. Gene 2013, 526, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shimada, N.; Sasaki, R.; Sato, S.; Kaneko, T.; Tabata, S.; Aoki, T.; Ayabe, S. A comprehensive analysis of six dihydroflavonol 4-reductases encoded by a gene cluster of the Lotus japonicus genome. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2573–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Singh, K.; Kumar, S.; Yadav, S.K.; Ahuja, P.S. Characterization of dihydroflavonol 4-reductase cDNA in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2009, 3, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, Y.; Gou, J.Q.; Jia, Z.C.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.M.; Xiao, X.Y.; Song, F.; Luo, K.M. Molecular cloning and characterization of two genes encoding dihydroflavonol-4-reductase from Populus trichocarpa. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chu, Y.X.; Pan, J.S.; Wu, A.Z.; Cai, R.; Chen, H.R. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of dihydroflavonol-4-reductase gene from Calibrachoa hybrida. Sci. Hortic. 2014, 165, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Leavitt, J.M.; Lloyd, A.M. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008, 53, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. de Vetten, N.; Quattrocchio, F.; Mol, J.; Koes, R. The an11 locus controlling flower pigmentation in petunia encodes a novel WD-repeat protein conserved in yeast, plants, and animals. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 1422–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xie, X.B.; Li, S.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.C.; Zhao, Q.; Yao, Y.X.; You, C.X.; Zhang, X.S.; Hao, Y.J. The bHLH transcription factor MdbHLH3 promotes anthocyanin accumulation and fruit colouration in response to low temperature in apples. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1884–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Liu, X.F.; Xiang, L.L.; Yin, X.R.; Grierson, D.; Li, F.; Chen, K.S. The identification of a MYB transcription factor controlling anthocyanin biosynthesis regulation in Chrysanthemum flowers. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 194, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Matsui, K.; Umemura, Y.; Ohme-Takagi, M. AtMYBL2, a protein with a single MYB domain, acts as a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 55, 954–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aharoni, A.; De Vos, C.H.R.; Wein, M.; Sun, Z.K.; Greco, R.; Kroon, A.; Mol, J.N.M.; O’Connell, A.P. The strawberry FaMYB1 transcription factor suppresses anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 2001, 28, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Ravaglia, D.; Espley, R.V.; Henry-Kirk, R.A.; Andreotti, C.; Ziosi, V.; Hellens, R.P.; Costa, G.; Allan, A.C. Transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in nectarine (Prunus persica) by a set of R2R3 MYB transcription factors. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hu, Z.H.; Tang, B.; Wu, Q.; Zheng, J.; Leng, P.S.; Zhang, K.D. Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals a difference in monoterpene biosynthesis between scented Lilium ‘Siberia’ and unscented Lilium ‘Novano’. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zeng, X.L.; Liu, C.; Zheng, R.R.; Cai, X.; Luo, J.; Zou, J.J.; Wang, C.Y. Emission and accumulation of monoterpene and the key terpene synthase (TPS) associated with monoterpene biosynthesis in Osmanthus fragrans Lour. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dudareva, N.; Martin, D.; Kish, C.M.; Kolosova, N.; Gorenstein, N.; Fäldt, J.; Bohlman, J. (E)-beta-ocimene and myrcene synthase genes of floral scent biosynthesis in snapdragon: Function and expression of three terpene synthase genes of a new terpene synthase subfamily. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1227–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Faldt, J.; Arimura, G.; Gershenzon, J.; Takabayashi, J.; Bohlmann, J. Functional identification of AtTPS03 as (E)-beta-ocimene synthase: A monoterpene synthase catalyzing jasmonate- and wound-induced volatile formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2003, 216, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Ma, J.K.; Wei, L.M.; Li, J.Y.; Li, H.G. The analysis of genes and phytohormone metabolic pathways associated with leaf shape development in Liriodendron chinense via De Novo transcriptome sequencing. Genes 2018, 9, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Grabherr, M.G.; Haas, B.J.; Yassour, M.; Levin, J.Z.; Thompson, D.A.; Amit, I.; Adiconis, X.N.; Fan, L.; Raychowdhury, R.; Zeng, Q.D.; et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mortazavi, A.; Williams, B.A.; Mccue, K.; Schaeffer, L.; Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhu, Q.D.; Song, Y.L.; Zhang, G.S.; Ju, L.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.G.; Niu, N.; Wang, J.W.; Ma, S.C. De novo assembly and transcriptome analysis of wheat with male sterility induced by the chemical hybridizing agent SQ-1. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yue, Y.Z.; Yin, C.Q.; Guo, R.; Peng, H.; Yang, Z.N.; Liu, G.F.; Bao, M.Z.; Hu, H.R. An anther-specific gene PhGRP is regulated by PhMYC2 and causes male sterility when overexpressed in petunia anthers. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cui, S.J.; He, Q.L.; Chen, Y.; Huang, M.R. Evaluation of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies in Lycoris longituba. J. Genet. 2011, 90, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yue, Y.Z.; Tian, S.Z.; Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, Y.Q.; Hu, H.R. Transcriptomic and GC-MS metabolomic analyses reveal the sink strength changes during petunia anther development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Plants 08 00053 g001 550
Figure 1. Lycoris longituba tepals and anthocyanin content at different samples. (a) Tepals of L. longituba ‘Pink’ and ‘White’ used for de novo transcriptome assembly (S1-P: small bud stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; S2-P: medium bud stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; S3-P: opening stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; and S3-W: opening stage of L. longituba ‘White’); (b) content of anthocyanin in different tepal stages.
Figure 1. Lycoris longituba tepals and anthocyanin content at different samples. (a) Tepals of L. longituba ‘Pink’ and ‘White’ used for de novo transcriptome assembly (S1-P: small bud stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; S2-P: medium bud stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; S3-P: opening stage of L. longituba ‘Pink’; and S3-W: opening stage of L. longituba ‘White’); (b) content of anthocyanin in different tepal stages.
Plants 08 00053 g001
Plants 08 00053 g002 550
Figure 2. Statistics of differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) between two different samples. White: up-regulated unigenes; black: down-regulated unigenes.
Figure 2. Statistics of differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) between two different samples. White: up-regulated unigenes; black: down-regulated unigenes.
Plants 08 00053 g002
Plants 08 00053 g003 550
Figure 3. The qRT-PCR validation of DEGs. (a) The relative expression levels of 21 pigmentation-related candidate unigenes. The left y-axis denotes the relative transcript amount obtained by qRT-PCR. The right y-axis represents the fragments per kilobase per million fragments (FPKM) value of each gene using RNA-Seq analysis. Error bars indicate the standard errors. (b) Correlation analysis of the gene expression value from RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR.
Figure 3. The qRT-PCR validation of DEGs. (a) The relative expression levels of 21 pigmentation-related candidate unigenes. The left y-axis denotes the relative transcript amount obtained by qRT-PCR. The right y-axis represents the fragments per kilobase per million fragments (FPKM) value of each gene using RNA-Seq analysis. Error bars indicate the standard errors. (b) Correlation analysis of the gene expression value from RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR.
Plants 08 00053 g003
Plants 08 00053 g004 550
Figure 4. GC-MS metabolomic analysis of L. longituba tepals. (a) Typical chromatograms of L. longituba tepals under S1, S2, and S3. (b) Score plot and (c) loading plot of tepal GC-MS profiles of L. longituba according to different developmental stages using orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA). Top 15 metabolites coded in the loading plot are: (1) caryophyllene, (2) trans-β-ocimene, (3) benzoic acid, methyl ester, (4) hexadecane, (5) benzoic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester, (6) β-myrcene, (7) butyl aldoxime, 3-methyl-, (8) 3-methoxy-5-methylphenol, (9) 1-butanol, 3-methyl-, benzoate, (10) benzyl nitrile, (11) benzene, (3-nitropropyl)-, (12) benzenepropanoic acid, α-(hydroxyimino)-, (13) 2,4,6-octatriene, 2,6-dimethyl-, (E,Z)-, (14) 1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (E)-, (15) octanoic acid, methyl ester.
Figure 4. GC-MS metabolomic analysis of L. longituba tepals. (a) Typical chromatograms of L. longituba tepals under S1, S2, and S3. (b) Score plot and (c) loading plot of tepal GC-MS profiles of L. longituba according to different developmental stages using orthogonal partial least-squares discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA). Top 15 metabolites coded in the loading plot are: (1) caryophyllene, (2) trans-β-ocimene, (3) benzoic acid, methyl ester, (4) hexadecane, (5) benzoic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester, (6) β-myrcene, (7) butyl aldoxime, 3-methyl-, (8) 3-methoxy-5-methylphenol, (9) 1-butanol, 3-methyl-, benzoate, (10) benzyl nitrile, (11) benzene, (3-nitropropyl)-, (12) benzenepropanoic acid, α-(hydroxyimino)-, (13) 2,4,6-octatriene, 2,6-dimethyl-, (E,Z)-, (14) 1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (E)-, (15) octanoic acid, methyl ester.
Plants 08 00053 g004
Plants 08 00053 g005 550
Figure 5. The expression profiles of differential expressed candidate genes. The heatmaps are generated according to the average expression levels of MYB (a), bHLH (b), and TPS (c) genes based on log2 transformed FPKM data. Green means low expression, and red means high expression.
Figure 5. The expression profiles of differential expressed candidate genes. The heatmaps are generated according to the average expression levels of MYB (a), bHLH (b), and TPS (c) genes based on log2 transformed FPKM data. Green means low expression, and red means high expression.
Plants 08 00053 g005
Table
Table 1. Transcriptome assembly statistics for L. longituba.
Table 1. Transcriptome assembly statistics for L. longituba.
DescriptionTranscripts
Number of transcripts144,922
Total assembled bases136,324,908
Average length (bps)941
N50 (bps)1527
GC content (%)46.11
Table
Table 2. Summary of the annotations from public databases. Nr: NCBI nonredundant protein; GO: gene ontology; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Table 2. Summary of the annotations from public databases. Nr: NCBI nonredundant protein; GO: gene ontology; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
DatabaseNumber of Annotated UnigenesPercentage of Annotated Unigenes (%)
Nr78,33654.05
Nt63,36243.72
Swiss-Prot56,76839.17
GO44,81330.92
KEGG48,37833.38
Total85,56359.04
Table
Table 3. The floral volatile organic compounds detected in L. longituba tepals.
Table 3. The floral volatile organic compounds detected in L. longituba tepals.
No.NameS1-PS2-PS3-P
1Benzoic acid0.0018 ± 0.00074.5579 ± 0.5830162.3274 ± 15.1509
2E-2-Hexenyl benzoate0.0032 ± 0.0007--
3Octanoic acid0.0025 ± 0.0003--
43-Methoxy-2,5-dimethylpyrazine0.0053 ± 0.0018--
5Hydroxylamine0.0016 ± 0.0004--
67,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)
deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione		0.0003 ± 0.0001--
7Hexadecanoic acid0.0056 ± 0.00060.2546 ± 0.1015-
81,3,6-Octatriene-13.0954 ± 5.7992-
9Benzenepropanoic acid-0.7522 ± 0.19971.5608 ± 0.5570
105-Amino-2-methoxy-4-picoline-0.2054 ± 0.0275-
11Octadecane-0.1720 ± 0.0195-
12Caryophyllene-0.1357 ± 0.02250.6197 ± 0.0981
13Hexadecane-4.5644 ± 0.876312.3402 ± 1.8746
14α-Farnesene-0.3350 ± 0.1492-
15Nonadecane-0.0984 ± 0.0116-
161-Hexadecanol-0.0735 ± 0.0295-
17Heptacosane-0.2135 ± 0.0520-
18Butyl aldoxime--2.5247 ± 0.4620
19trans-β-Ocimene--85.4689 ± 5.0140
20Benzyl nitrile--10.2698 ± 2.6025
21Benzoic acid--145.0866 ± 12.9669
221-Butanol--15.5708 ± 3.5003
23β-Myrcene--1.4760 ± 0.2479
24Eucalyptol--2.7087 ± 1.0158
252,4,6-Octatriene--2.6357 ± 0.8897
26α-Terpineol--0.6584 ± 0.4979
273-Methoxy-5-methylphenol--0.6302 ± 0.1412
28Benzene--1.9492 ± 0.4702
291,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol--0.0591 ± 0.0181

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; Shi, T.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Du, J.; Jiang, H.; Yang, X.; Hu, H.; Wang, L. Integrating Transcriptomic and GC-MS Metabolomic Analysis to Characterize Color and Aroma Formation during Tepal Development in Lycoris longituba. Plants 2019, 8, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8030053

AMA Style

Yue Y, Liu J, Shi T, Chen M, Li Y, Du J, Jiang H, Yang X, Hu H, Wang L. Integrating Transcriptomic and GC-MS Metabolomic Analysis to Characterize Color and Aroma Formation during Tepal Development in Lycoris longituba. Plants. 2019; 8(3):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8030053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yue, Yuanzheng, Jiawei Liu, Tingting Shi, Min Chen, Ya Li, Juhua Du, Haiyan Jiang, Xiulian Yang, Huirong Hu, and Lianggui Wang. 2019. "Integrating Transcriptomic and GC-MS Metabolomic Analysis to Characterize Color and Aroma Formation during Tepal Development in Lycoris longituba" Plants 8, no. 3: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8030053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop