Next Article in Journal
Current Status and Future Prospects in Herbicide Discovery
Previous Article in Journal
Jasmonates—the Master Regulator of Rice Development, Adaptation and Defense
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Redistribution of 109Cd and 65Zn in the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L.: Influence of Cadmium and Zinc Concentrations in the Root Medium

1
Institute of Plant Sciences and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland
2
Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2019, 8(9), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090340
Submission received: 20 June 2019 / Revised: 5 September 2019 / Accepted: 9 September 2019 / Published: 10 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Physiology and Metabolism)

Abstract

:
Heavy metal redistribution is relevant for the quality of edible crops and the suitability of hyperaccumulators for bioremediation. Root-to-shoot transfer via the xylem and redistribution in the aerial parts via the phloem differ between various heavy metals. In general, cadmium is more slowly released to the shoot than zinc (e.g., in wheat, bean, and lupin). However, rapid cadmium transport to the shoot was detected in the hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. This is a key aspect in this article and might be important for bioremediation. The radionuclides 109Cd and 65Zn were used to investigate the respective influence of elevated cadmium or zinc in the root medium on the dynamics of the two heavy metals in S. nigrum. Although transport via the xylem to the leaves was similar for 109Cd and 65Zn, the further redistribution from older leaves to younger leaves, flowers, and fruits via the phloem was far less efficient for 109Cd than for 65Zn. Furthermore, the redistribution of 109Cd within the shoot was negatively influenced by increased cadmium (but not by increased zinc) concentrations in the nutrient medium. The redistribution of 65Zn in the shoot was selectively decreased by increased zinc concentrations (but generally not by cadmium).

1. Introduction

Heavy metal uptake, distribution, and redistribution processes on the whole plant level are important aspects for major crop plants [1,2,3,4], as well as for heavy metal hyperaccumulators [5,6,7,8]. Heavy metal contents in harvested products (e.g., cereal or soybean grains) are highly relevant for the quality of plant products for human or animal nutrition [9,10,11]. The acquisition and distribution of heavy metals are important aspects when considering hyperaccumulators for bioremediation purposes [7,8,12,13,14]. Besides the uptake into the roots of such plants, the root-to-shoot transfer and the distribution within the aerial plant parts are key aspects in this context, allowing efficient heavy metal removal from contaminated fields.
The acropetal transport with the transpiration stream in the xylem and the symplastic long-distance transport via the phloem are both important for the final distribution of the various heavy metals in a plant [8,15,16,17,18,19]. The distribution patterns in plants may differ considerably between various heavy metals and plant species. Cobalt is strongly retained in the root system [8,18,20]. In contrast, manganese is easily transported to transpiring leaves, but following this, is not efficiently redistributed within the shoot [16,18,20]. Nickel is very mobile in plants and directed to growing plant parts (root system, youngest shoot organs) [4,16,18,20]. In general, zinc is more rapidly released from the roots to the shoot than cadmium and is also then more easily redistributed within the shoot via the phloem [18,20]. The redistribution of a heavy metal may additionally be affected by environmental conditions, such as drought [21], light intensity [22], or nitrogen source [23,24], as well as by the availability of other heavy metals [25]. Cadmium and zinc contents are often both increased in polluted soils [26,27]. Cadmium/zinc interactions influencing the subcellular distribution and long-distance transport in crop plants were recently reported [23,24]. Cadmium uptake in wheat was found to be inhibited by zinc on a nutrient medium containing ammonium, while cadmium transport was stimulated by zinc [23]. Furthermore, the chemical form of the nitrogen source (ammonium or nitrate) modified cadmium/zinc interactions in these plants [23,24].
Several processes may influence the mobility of heavy metals on the whole plant level and these processes may be, to some extent, specific for certain elements. For some heavy metals, a considerable portion is usually retained in the root system. This may be caused by precipitation or ion exchange processes at the root surface or in the root apoplast before reaching the plasmalemma of root cells or by cellular/subcellular compartmentation after uptake into root cells [4,19]. Complexes with organic acids, nicotianamine, or phytochelatin may influence the root-to-shoot transfer [28,29,30]. All the processes mentioned may contribute to the discrimination between various heavy metals. In general, cobalt and, to a lesser extent, also cadmium, are rather strongly retained in the root system, while zinc and nickel are far more mobile [4,18,20].
Solanum nigrum L. grown on contaminated soil can accumulate large quantities of cadmium in the shoot, indicating that this species represents a cadmium hyperaccumulator and might be useful for the bioremediation of soils contaminated with this heavy metal [13]. S. nigrum tolerates high cadmium levels in the soil and enriches it in the shoot (13). The rapid transfer of cadmium and zinc to the shoot (an important property of a hyperaccumulator) was confirmed in a hydroponic culture [8]. In contrast to wheat, dwarf bean, or lupin, cadmium and zinc are rapidly transferred from the roots to the aerial plant parts of the hyperaccumulator S. nigrum [4,8,18,20]. Bean was extremely inefficient in the transfer of cadmium from the medium to the shoot, regardless of the cadmium concentration in the medium, while wheat was only slightly more efficient [25]. In wheat and bean, the zinc transfer to the shoot was somewhat better than for cadmium, but it was still far less efficient than in S. nigrum [25]. For the study reported here, the relative mobilities of the often co-occurring elements cadmium and zinc and possible interferences in the transport of the two elements are particularly interesting. It appears likely that xylem loading in the roots is a key process for rapid transport via the transpiration stream from the root system to the leaves [4,19]. Increased cadmium or zinc levels in the root medium only caused rather modest effects on the transport of 109Cd and 65Zn in bean and wheat [25]. Since S. nigrum differs considerably from wheat and bean in the accumulation and transport of cadmium and zinc on the whole plant level, the results obtained with the two crop plants mentioned cannot be simply transferred to this hyperaccumulator [8,18,20].
The aim of the work reported here was to identify the influence of an increased zinc or cadmium supply on the dynamics of these elements, with special reference to interactions between cadmium and zinc translocation in the hyperaccumulator S. nigrum. The radionuclides 109Cd and 65Zn allow sensitive and simultaneous detection in various plant parts with gamma spectrometry [8,15,16,18,20,21,22,25]. Besides the root-to-shoot transfer, the redistribution within the shoot from older leaves to younger leaves and finally to flowers/fruits can be addressed with the technique used. Additionally, visualization of the distribution/redistribution of 65Zn can be envisaged with autoradiography [18,20,21].

2. Results

In a first set of experiments (Figure 1), plants were grown on unlabeled nutrient media with various zinc or cadmium concentrations and the radionuclides 109Cd and 65Zn were added to the nutrient media at day 7, day 31, or day 59. The plants were collected 4 or 5 days after adding 109Cd and 65Zn and the radiolabels were detected in the separated organs by gamma spectrometry (Figure 1). The data from these analyses refer to the distribution of cadmium and zinc recently taken up from the nutrient media. In controls, 40%–50% of 109Cd and 65Zn added to the medium reached the aerial plant parts. A considerable portion of the 109Cd (but not the 65Zn) accumulated in the stem. The transport of 109Cd to the shoot was stimulated by increased zinc in the medium in young plants and was ineffective in older plants. No significant effect on 109Cd transport was observed for 1 µM Cd, while transfer to the shoot was drastically reduced for 10 µM Cd. In contrast, 65Zn transport to the shoot was only moderately affected by 1 or 10 µM Cd, but was drastically decreased by 1 or 10 µM Zn in the medium. It should be noticed that the radioisotope contents are expressed as the % of the label added to the medium and the sum in the various plant parts may therefore be less than 100%. Parts of the label may not have been taken up, were released again from roots into the medium, or were still present in senesced leaves falling from the plants. The results from these analyses indicate that the effects were rather specific and not general effects on transport.
In a second series of experiments, young plants (grown on standard nutrient medium) were labeled 17 d after initiating germination with 109Cd and 65Zn for 3 d and the labeled plants were then transferred to the various media. This setup was very helpful for addressing the redistribution processes within the shoot throughout growth and maturation. Increased zinc concentrations in the medium caused no major effect on 109Cd redistribution, while 1 or 10 µM (but not 0.1 µM) cadmium in the medium negatively influenced the root-to-shoot transfer and the redistribution from vegetative shoot parts to the reproductive organs (Figure 2). The decrease in the leaves was mainly caused by the loss of leaf biomass during reproductive growth. In general, 65Zn was more efficiently transferred to flowers and fruits than 109Cd (Figure 2 and Figure 3). No major effect of cadmium or 1 µM Zn on the distribution of 65Zn between roots, the stem, leaves, and flowers/fruits was visible, but 10 µM Zn in the medium clearly lowered the release from the roots to the shoot and the subsequent transfer to the reproductive organs (Figure 3). The still relatively high level of 65Zn in the stem of plants for 10 µM Zn at day 53 may be due to a retention of 65Zn delivered from the roots via the xylem to the shoot or of 65Zn remobilized via the phloem from leaves (Figure 3).
This effect was visualized by autoradiography (Figure 4). In control plants, the label moved from roots to older leaves, then to younger leaves, and finally to flowers/fruits. In the presence of 10 µM Zn, the label remained in leaves 1 and 2, while only trace amounts reached younger leaves and flowers/fruits.
The separate analysis of leaves of different ages led to a more detailed picture of the redistribution within vegetative shoot parts (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). At day 11, 109Cd was mainly (>50%) located in the cotyledons and leaves 1 and 2 (Figure 5). Zn addition to the medium caused no major differences in the 109Cd distribution within the shoot, while cadmium addition significantly decreased the transfer to the youngest leaves (leaves 5/6 and 7/8) in a consistent manner, from 0.1 to 10 µM Cd in the medium (Figure 5). The distribution of 65Zn considerably differed at day 11 from that of 109Cd (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Rather low 65Zn levels were detected at day 11 in cotyledons and leaves 1 and 2 (Figure 6). However, in the presence of 10 µM Zn in the medium, more 65Zn was retained in this sample and less 65Zn reached the top leaves. Some differences between the control and plants on 1 and 10 µM Cd were significant, but the overall patterns were still very similar and not comparable with the strong effect of 10 µM Zn.
The specific effects of zinc and cadmium in the medium on 109Cd and 65Zn distribution were far more pronounced at day 21 than at day 11 (Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). More leaves (“youngest leaves”) and flowers/fruits were also developed at day 21 and were included in the analysis as separate samples (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The decrease in 109Cd contents in cotyledons and leaves 1 and 2 between day 11 and day 21 was not significantly affected by elevated zinc concentrations in the medium (Figure 7). The transfer of 109Cd to the uppermost shoot parts (youngest leaves and flowers/fruits) was also not clearly influenced by zinc. 109Cd remobilization from the oldest leaves was negatively affected by cadmium in the medium (at all cadmium concentrations used). The transfer of 109Cd was significantly lower in the presence of 1 or 10 µM Cd than in controls or in the presence of high zinc levels or 0.1 µM Cd in the medium (Figure 7). The results from the same experimental setup with 65Zn are shown in Figure 8 and clearly illustrate the high specificity of cadmium and zinc influences on long-distance transport in Solanum nigrum L. No or only minor effects on 65Zn redistribution were observed in plants grown on nutrient solutions with cadmium (0.1, 1, and 10 µM Cd) or on a solution with 1 µM Zn. A strong inhibition of 65Zn redistribution from older leaves to the youngest leaves and to the reproductive structure was observed in plants grown on a nutrient solution with 10 µM Zn (Figure 8). The 65Zn content in cotyledons and leaves 1/2 was still high in these plants, but the difference in comparison to the control was not significant (large standard error). The negative effects of 10 µM Zn in the nutrient solution on the redistribution of 65Zn to the youngest leaves are highly significant and very visible in Figure 8. All of the results reported above document the generally specific effects of zinc and cadmium on the long-distance transport and final accumulation of the radioisotopes 109Cd and 65Zn.

3. Discussion

The previously reported efficient transfer of cadmium from the roots to the shoot in Solanum nigrum L. was confirmed in this study and further investigated considering the effects of increased cadmium or zinc concentrations on redistribution processes for these two heavy metals. The findings from the experiments reported here document that cadmium is even more rapidly transferred to the shoot than zinc. However, further redistribution within the aerial parts clearly differs for the two heavy metals. While more than 40% of the initially introduced 65Zn may finally reach the flowers/fruits, this value is far lower for 109Cd. The separate analyses of the contents in various leaves document a strong retention of 109Cd in the oldest leaves, which is most likely due to a poor redistribution via the phloem. Phloem loading must be considered as the key process for the redistribution within the shoot. The cause for poor remobilization may be either a strong retention of cadmium in leaf cells or in the leaf apoplast, preventing the heavy metals from reaching the phloem or the transfer into the phloem itself. The findings reported here indicate that the effects of increased cadmium or zinc levels quite selectively affect the redistribution of the two heavy metals from older leaves to younger leaves and to reproductive organs. Therefore, it appears unlikely that general effects (e.g., competition for endogenous chelators and toxic effects on metabolism) were the main mechanisms influencing cadmium and zinc redistribution in the shoots of Solanum nigrum.
The content of cadmium in the whole shoot may considerably decrease during maturation, since senesced leaves still containing this heavy metal may be lost. This effect is far less important for zinc than for cadmium, since zinc was more efficiently transported from older leaves to younger leaves and to flowers/fruits. Two important processes must therefore be distinguished: (a) the acropetal transport from the roots to transpiring parts of the shoot via the xylem and (b) the further redistribution via the phloem. Leaf senescence and the content of heavy metals in fallen leaves are important when establishing remediation protocols and the time for removing biomass from contaminated fields. The points mentioned above are highly relevant when considering a plant for bioremediation and for planning the bioremediation (especially plant parts to be collected and timing of collection). Such aspects must also be borne in mind for the selection or breeding of suitable genotypes for bioremediation.
The physiological processes involved in the rapid root-to-shoot transfer of cadmium in Solanum nigrum L. remain to be elucidated in more detail. The compartmentation on the tissue and on the subcellular level is an especially open question and might be addressed with suitable techniques. Chelators may also play a key role in this context, but so far, essentially no information is available for this plant. Cobalt was only very slowly transported from the roots to the shoot [8], indicating that the efficient root-to-shoot transfer observed for cadmium is a rather specific, and not general, phenomenon.

4. Materials and Methods

The source of the seeds and plant cultivation [8] were published earlier in detail and are therefore only summarized here. Dry Solanum nigrum L. seeds were soaked for 1 d at 4 °C in 0.1% (w/v) KNO3, germinated for 7 d on tissue paper moistened with 0.1% (w/v) KNO3, and afterwards grown hydroponically on a standard nutrient medium, as reported previously [8]. The standard medium contained 6 mM KH2PO4, 3 mM MgSO4, 1.36 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.88 mM KNO3, 30 µM Fe as Fe-EDDHA, 1 µM MnCl2, 5 µM, H3BO3, 0.16 µM ZnSO4, 0.2 µM Na2MoO4, 0,048 µM Ni(NO3)2, and 0.1 µM CuSO4 [8]. The pH was in the range of 4.4–4.7. Cadmium was not added to a standard nutrient medium, but was present as a contaminant in solutes added and was detected in a concentration of 0.0016 µM. To prepare nutrient media with increased zinc or cadmium concentrations, ZnCl2 or CdCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, SG, Switzerland) were added from 100 mM stock solutions to a standard nutrient medium. All experiments were performed in a culture room with 14 h light (200 µmol photons m−2 s−1 from 4 Lumilux, Osram FQ 39 W/840 HO and 4 Lumilux, Osram FQ 39 W/830 HO) and 10 h darkness. The room temperature was 25 °C during the light phase and 20 °C during the dark phase.
Two types of experiments were performed. For the experiment documented in Figure 1, young plants (10 d old) were transferred to a standard medium or to a standard medium with an increased Cd (+1 µM Cd or +10 µM Cd) or increased zinc concentration (+1 µM Zn or +10 µM Zn). From preliminary experiments, it became evident that the growth of Solanum nigrum is severely affected during long-term exposure to cadmium concentrations above 10 µM, while higher zinc concentrations caused no visible symptoms. Based on these observations, the highest concentration used in the experiments reported here was 10 µM for both elements in the nutrient medium. Details of the timing of the various labeling phases are indicated in the legend of Figure 1. The plants were transferred individually to containers with labeling solution containing 109Cd (from Amersham BioSciences UK Ltd., Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and 65Zn (from PerkinElmer AG, Schwerzenbach, ZH, Switzerland) to avoid competition between plants for the radionuclides and to achieve well-standardized labeling of the plants. The zinc and cadmium concentrations during the labeling phase were identical to those before labeling. Since the plants were rapidly growing, it was necessary to adapt the volume of the labeling solution for the three labeling periods. For the labeling phase from day 7 to day 12, each plant was supplied with 20.5 mL of the solution indicated (containing 3.1 Bq 109Cd and 3.1 Bq 65Zn), for the phase from day 31 to day 35 with 151 mL (containing 6.2 Bq 109Cd and 6.2 Bq 65Zn), and for the labeling phase from day 59 to day 63 with 242 mL (containing 12.4 Bq 109Cd and 12.3 Bq 65Zn). After the labeling phase of 4 or 5 days, plants (four replicates per treatment) were collected and dissected and the separated organs were dried prior to analyzing the 109Cd and 65Zn contents by gamma spectrometry. After completing the experiment, all samples were analyzed with a gamma counter (1480 Wizard 3′, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland), allowing the simultaneous measurement of 109Cd and 65Zn and equipped with automatic correction for decay with the half-life. To allow a comparison of the two isotopes and the three labeling intervals, the contents in the various plant parts were expressed as the % of the label added to the nutrient medium for each plant.
For another series of analyses (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8), seeds were germinated on moistened tissue paper and the young plants (10 d old) were grown on a standard nutrient solution, as mentioned above. Plants (17 d old) were then individually transferred to small bottles with 20.5 mL standard nutrient solution containing 3.1 Bq 109Cd and 3.1 Bq 65Zn (but without increased cadmium or zinc concentrations). After the labeling phase (3 d), the plants were placed in darkened containers with the various media (standard nutrient medium; standard nutrient with 0.1, 1, or 10 µM Cd; standard nutrient with 1 or 10 µM Zn). Nutrient media were replaced with fresh media containing the same concentrations of heavy metals repeatedly throughout plant growth and maturation. Plants (four replicates per treatment) were collected at day 0 (immediately after the labeling phase), day 11, day 21, and day 53. The various organs were immediately separated and dried prior to analyzing the 109Cd and 65Zn contents by gamma spectrometry, as mentioned above.
Plant preparation for autoradiography (Figure 4) was described previously [18]. Only one radionuclide can be applied to a plant, since proper discrimination is not possible (in contrast to gamma spectrometry). Young plants (13 d old) were labeled separately for one day on tubes with 3 mL standard nutrient solution containing 18.6 Bq 65Zn. After the labeling phase (day 0), the plants were transferred to the nutrient medium indicated (without the radionuclide). Plants were collected at day 0, day 7, day 14, and day 30. The plants were prepared immediately after collection for autoradiography, dried, and then stored and exposed simultaneously at the end of the experiment for 227 d to X-ray films (Fuji medical X-ray film, super RX, Fujifilm AG, Dielsdorf, ZH, Switzerland). The long exposure time was necessary to compensate for the low 65Zn contents in the plants. For technical reasons (no suitably labeled plants available), autoradiography was not possible for 109Cd.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.F.; plant cultivation, sample preparation, and autoradiography, I.A.; radioisotope analyses, U.F. and S.W.; discussion and interpretation of data, U.F., I.A. and S.W.; data presentation and preparation of the first draft, U.F.; writing and editing, U.F., I.A. and S.W.; funding acquisition, U.F. and S.W.

Funding

This research was funded by the Sino Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation (SSSTC, EG 06-092011) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 41571300).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Valérie Page for establishing the experimental techniques and for stimulating discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Grotz, N.; Guerinot, M.L. Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rascio, N.; Vecchia, F.D.; La Rocca, N.; Barbato, R.; Pagliano, C.; Raviolo, M.; Gonnelli, C.; Gabbrielli, R. Metal accumulation and damage in rice (cv. Vialone nano) seedlings exposed to cadmium. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 62, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bouis, H.E.; Welch, R.M. Biofortification-A sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci. 2010, 50, S20–S32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Page, V.; Feller, U. Heavy Metals in Crop Plants: Transport and Redistribution Processes on the Whole Plant Level. Agronomy 2015, 5, 447–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pence, N.S.; Larsen, P.B.; Ebbs, S.D.; Letham, D.L.D.; Lasat, M.M.; Garvin, D.F.; Eide, D.; Kochian, L.V. The molecular physiology of heavy metal transport in the Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4956–4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, X.; Fen g, Y.; He, Z.L.; Stoffella, P.J. Molecular mechanisms of heavy metal hyperaccumulation and phytoremediation. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 18, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kramer, U. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wei, S.; Anders, I.; Feller, U. Selective uptake, distribution, and redistribution of Cd-109, Co-57, Zn-65, Ni-63, and Cs-134 via xylem and phloem in the heavy metal hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 7624–7630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Demirezen, D.; Aksoy, A. Heavy metal levels in vegetables in Turkey are within safe limits for Cu, Zn, Ni and exceeded for Cd and Pb. J. Food Qual. 2006, 29, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, P.J.; Broadley, M.R. Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets—Iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 49–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stasinos, S.; Nasopoulou, C.; Tsikrika, C.; Zabetakis, I. The bioaccumulation and physiological effects of heavy metals in carrots, onions, and potatoes and dietary implications for Cr and Ni: A review. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, R765–R780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kramer, U.; Chardonnens, A.N. The use of transgenic plants in the bioremediation of soils contaminated with trace elements. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 55, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wei, S.H.; Zhou, Q.X.; Koval, P.V. Flowering stage characteristics of cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and their significance to phytoremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 369, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Memon, A.R.; Schroder, P. Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Herren, T.; Feller, U. Transport of cadmium via xylem and phloem in maturing wheat shoots: Comparison with the translocation of zinc, strontium and rubidium. Ann. Bot. 1997, 80, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riesen, O.; Feller, U. Redistribution of nickel, cobalt, manganese, zinc and cadmium via the phloem in young and maturing wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mari, S.; Gendre, D.; Pianelli, K.; Ouerdane, L.; Lobinski, R.; Briat, J.-F. Root-to-shoot long-distance circulation of nicotianamine and nicotianamine-nickel chelates in the metal hyperaccumulator Thlaspi Caerulescens. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 4111–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Page, V.; Weisskopf, L.; Feller, U. Heavy metals in white lupin: Uptake, root-to-shoot transfer and redistribution within the plant. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Miyadate, H.; Adachi, S.; Hiraizumi, A.; Tezuka, K.; Nakazawa, N.; Kawamoto, T.; Katou, K.; Kodama, I.; Sakurai, K.; Takahashi, H.; et al. OsHMA3, a P-1B-type of ATPase affects root-to-shoot cadmium translocation in rice by mediating efflux into vacuoles. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Page, V.; Feller, U. Selective transport of zinc, manganese, nickel, cobalt and cadmium in the root system and transfer to the leaves in young wheat plants. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feller, U.; Anders, I.; Wei, S. Effects of PEG-Induced Water Deficit in Solanum nigrum on Zn and Ni Uptake and Translocation in Split Root Systems. Plants 2015, 4, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Page, V.; Feller, U. Light intensity selectively influences the distribution and further redistribution of macroand micronutrients in hydroponically grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant. Nutr. 2016, 39, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, Y.; Wang, C.; Chai, S.; Shuai, W.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Kang, H.; Fan, X.; Zeng, J.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Ammonium N influences the uptakes, translocations, subcellular distributions and chemical forms of Cd and Zn to mediate the Cd/Zn interactions in dwarf polish wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) seedlings. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, X.L.; Cheng, Y.R.; Shuai, W.D.; Zeng, J.; Kang, H.Y.; Fan, X.; Sha, L.N.; Zhang, H.Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.H. Nitrate N influences the accumulations and subcellular distributions of Cd and Zn to mediate the Cd/Zn interactions in dwarf Polish Wheat (Triticum polonicum L.) seedlings. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simek, I.; Tuma, I.; Feller, U. Accumulation, distribution and redistribution of 109Cd and 65Zn in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants on nutrient media with elevated zinc or cadmium. J. Elem. 2019, 24, 1129–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edelstein, M.; Ben-Hur, M. Heavy metals and metalloids: Sources, risks and strategies to reduce their accumulation in horticultural crops. Sci. Hort. 2018, 234, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, L.; Shen, Y.; Wang, X.; Chu, B.; Xu, T.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, J. Phytoavailability, bioaccumulation, and human health risks of metal(loid) elements in an agroecosystem near a lead-zinc mine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 24111–24124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bhatia, N.P.; Walsh, K.B.; Baker, A.J.M. Detection and quantification of ligands involved in nickel detoxification in a herbaceous Ni hyperaccumulator Stackhousia tryonii Bailey. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1343–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sagardoy, R.; Morales, F.; Rellen-Alvarez, R.; Abadia, A.; Abadia, J.; Lopez-Millan, A.F. Carboxylate metabolism in sugar beet plants grown with excess Zn. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 730–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stolt, J.P.; Sneller, F.E.C.; Bryngellson, T.; Lundborg, T.; Schat, H. Phytochelatin and cadmium accumulation in wheat. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003, 49, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Influence of elevated concentrations in the nutrient medium on the distribution of 109Cd and 65Zn. Young plants (10 d old) were transferred at day 0 to the nutrient media with different cadmium and zinc concentrations. The labeling period is indicated below the diagrams: the first number indicates the beginning (addition of 109Cd and 65Zn to the nutrient media) and the second number the end (plant analysis) of the labeling phase. Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated above the columns (Student’s t-test).
Figure 1. Influence of elevated concentrations in the nutrient medium on the distribution of 109Cd and 65Zn. Young plants (10 d old) were transferred at day 0 to the nutrient media with different cadmium and zinc concentrations. The labeling period is indicated below the diagrams: the first number indicates the beginning (addition of 109Cd and 65Zn to the nutrient media) and the second number the end (plant analysis) of the labeling phase. Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated above the columns (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g001
Figure 2. Influence of elevated cadmium (1 µM Cd and 10 µM Cd) or zinc (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) concentrations in the nutrient medium on the redistribution of 109Cd. The plants were labeled with 109Cd in standard nutrient medium for 3 d before transferring them to the media indicated (day 0). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated in the insets for the various plant parts collected on day 11, day 21, and day 53 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 2. Influence of elevated cadmium (1 µM Cd and 10 µM Cd) or zinc (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) concentrations in the nutrient medium on the redistribution of 109Cd. The plants were labeled with 109Cd in standard nutrient medium for 3 d before transferring them to the media indicated (day 0). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated in the insets for the various plant parts collected on day 11, day 21, and day 53 (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g002
Figure 3. Influence of elevated cadmium (1 µM Cd and 10 µM Cd) or zinc (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) concentrations in the nutrient medium on the redistribution of 65Zn. The plants were labeled with 65Zn in standard nutrient medium for 3 d before transferring them to the media indicated (day 0). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated in the insets for the various plant parts collected on day 11, day 21, and day 53 (Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. Influence of elevated cadmium (1 µM Cd and 10 µM Cd) or zinc (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) concentrations in the nutrient medium on the redistribution of 65Zn. The plants were labeled with 65Zn in standard nutrient medium for 3 d before transferring them to the media indicated (day 0). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated in the insets for the various plant parts collected on day 11, day 21, and day 53 (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g003
Figure 4. Autoradiographs of plants labeled for 1 d with 65Zn before day 0 and then incubated for 7, 14, or 30 d on standard medium without (Control) or with additional zinc (+10 µM Zn++). Cotyledons (C), leaf 1 (1), leaf 2 (2), and flowers/fruits (F) are indicated.
Figure 4. Autoradiographs of plants labeled for 1 d with 65Zn before day 0 and then incubated for 7, 14, or 30 d on standard medium without (Control) or with additional zinc (+10 µM Zn++). Cotyledons (C), leaf 1 (1), leaf 2 (2), and flowers/fruits (F) are indicated.
Plants 08 00340 g004
Figure 5. Redistribution of 109Cd in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 11 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Figure 5. Redistribution of 109Cd in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 11 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g005
Figure 6. Redistribution of 65Zn in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations during 11 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Figure 6. Redistribution of 65Zn in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations during 11 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g006
Figure 7. Redistribution of 109Cd in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 21 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Figure 7. Redistribution of 109Cd in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 21 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g007
Figure 8. Redistribution of 65Zn in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 21 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Figure 8. Redistribution of 65Zn in plants grown on standard nutrient medium (Control) or on the same medium with increased Zn (1 µM Zn and 10 µM Zn) or Cd (0.1 µM Cd, 1 µM Cd, and 10 µM Cd) concentrations for 21 d after the labeling phase (duration: 3 d). Means + SE of four replicates are shown. Significantly higher (*, **, ***) and lower (*, **, ***) values than in control plants on the P = 0.05 (*, *), P = 0.01 (**, **), and P = 0.001 (***, ***) level are indicated (Student’s t-test).
Plants 08 00340 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feller, U.; Anders, I.; Wei, S. Distribution and Redistribution of 109Cd and 65Zn in the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L.: Influence of Cadmium and Zinc Concentrations in the Root Medium. Plants 2019, 8, 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090340

AMA Style

Feller U, Anders I, Wei S. Distribution and Redistribution of 109Cd and 65Zn in the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L.: Influence of Cadmium and Zinc Concentrations in the Root Medium. Plants. 2019; 8(9):340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090340

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feller, Urs, Iwona Anders, and Shuhe Wei. 2019. "Distribution and Redistribution of 109Cd and 65Zn in the Heavy Metal Hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L.: Influence of Cadmium and Zinc Concentrations in the Root Medium" Plants 8, no. 9: 340. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090340

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop