Next Article in Journal
Impact of Seed Dressing and Soil Application of Potassium Humate on Cotton Plants Productivity and Fiber Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Variability in the Content of Phenolic Compounds in Plum Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Cultivated Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Suffered a Severe Cytoplasmic Bottleneck during Domestication: Implications from Chloroplast Genomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variability in the Qualitative and Quantitative Composition and Content of Phenolic Compounds in the Fruit of Introduced American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/plants9111446
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Genetic Diversity of Cranberry Crop Wild Relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with Special Emphasis on National Forests

by
Lorraine Rodriguez-Bonilla
1,
Karen A. Williams
2,*,
Fabian Rodríguez Bonilla
3,
Daniel Matusinec
1,
Andrew Maule
1,
Kevin Coe
1,
Eric Wiesman
4,
Luis Diaz-Garcia
5 and
Juan Zalapa
1,4,*
1
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2
USDA-ARS, National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
3
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
4
USDA-ARS, Vegetable Crops Research Unit, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
5
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Aguascalientes 34170, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(11), 1446; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111446
Submission received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 12 October 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 / Published: 26 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Resources of Berry and Medicinal Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Knowledge of the genetic diversity in populations of crop wild relatives (CWR) can inform effective strategies for their conservation and facilitate utilization to solve agricultural challenges. Two crop wild relatives of the cultivated cranberry are widely distributed in the US. We studied 21 populations of Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and 24 populations of Vaccinium oxycoccos L. across much of their native ranges in the US using 32 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. We observed high levels of heterozygosity for both species across populations with private alleles ranging from 0 to 26. For V. macrocarpon, we found a total of 613 alleles and high levels of heterozygosity (HO = 0.99, HT = 0.75). We also observed high numbers of alleles (881) and levels of heterozygosity (HO = 0.71, HT = 0.80) in V. oxycoccos (4x). Our genetic analyses confirmed the field identification of a native population of V. macrocarpon on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in the state of Washington, far outside the previously reported range for the species. Our results will help to inform efforts of the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) and the United States Forest Service (USFS) to conserve the most diverse and unique wild cranberry populations through ex situ preservation of germplasm and in situ conservation in designated sites on National Forests.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Crop wild relatives (CWR), in addition to being important components of ecosystems, are critical sources of genetic variation for crop improvement programs. These wild relatives often display more genetic variability than their cultivated counterparts and their evolution in the wild is dynamic, driven by interactions with both biotic and abiotic stressors [1]. The use of these resources in breeding programs is increasing as molecular applications are used to identify and facilitate the introgression of traits from CWR into cultivated varieties [2]. To support current and future sustainable agriculture and food security, these resources must be conserved and made available using a complementary strategy involving both ex situ and in situ conservation. The use of estimators of genetic diversity, such as number of private alleles, heterozygosity, and population differentiation, can help inform conservation decisions, including the prioritization of populations for protection as in situ reserve [3].
The American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton) is a diploid perennial species with a natural distribution ranging from Newfoundland to the southern Appalachian Mountains, and extending west to Minnesota [4,5]. It occurs on acid soils and peat of bogs, swamps, wet shores, headlands, and occasionally poorly drained upland meadows [4]. It is found growing with other species adapted to the conditions in these environments, including sphagnum mosses, other ericaceous shrubs, graminoids, insectivorous plants, and widely scattered coniferous trees.
The majority of the existing cranberry cultivars, upon which the cranberry industry is based, are derived from wild selections of V. macrocarpon known as the “Big Seven” made in the 19th and 20th centuries [6,7,8]. The value of the industry, currently around $3.5. billion, continues to grow with high demand for products made with cranberry, which has a high nutritional content and one of the highest antioxidant profiles found in fruits [9,10,11]. Breeding programs are actively searching for sources of desirable traits that can be incorporated into new cultivars to withstand the pressures of diseases and insects as well as environmental stresses related to climate change, which in cranberry has resulted in crop loss due to frost damage [8,12,13].
The small cranberry, Vaccinium oxycoccos L. (4x), is morphologically very similar to the American cranberry and grows in similar environments as a small, evergreen, perennial vine [4,14]. Vaccinium oxycoccos produces small over-wintering berries that have a flavor profile similar to cultivated cranberry, but exhibit a superior antioxidant profile and cold hardiness [11,15]. As a wild relative to the cultivated cranberry, V. oxycoccos has great potential to be used as a parent in interspecific crosses to transfer desirable traits. In particular, since V. oxycoccos has a circumboreal distribution and is adapted to growing in higher latitudes than V. macrocarpon [16], the species could be an excellent source of cold hardiness genes, as is the case for a wild relative of rice [17].
Molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSR) have been identified for many plant species and successfully used to gain insights into the genetic diversity of CWR of several crops, including apple [18], wheat [19], sugarcane [20], and sweet potato [21]. In cranberry, SSR markers have been used to evaluate the genetic diversity of wild populations in Wisconsin and Minnesota [22,23] and have proven to be transferable across species in the genus Vaccinium [24], which will also facilitate interspecific breeding and fingerprinting. Results from genetic diversity analyses have provided sufficient information to aid in situ conservation efforts in several plant species, such as Borderea chouardii Gaussen and Heslot, an endangered plant in Spain [25], and wild potatoes in Argentina [26].
Information on the genetic diversity of CWR necessary to inform the development of effective conservation strategies is limited. The occurrence of the wild cranberry species Vaccinium macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos on National Forests located throughout much of the ranges of the species, as well as collaborations between the United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) and the United States Forest Service (USFS), and the University of Wisconsin, provided an opportunity to gain knowledge about the genetic diversity and population structure of these species (Figure 1, Table 1). These insights can help to prioritize conservation efforts for cranberry genetic resources in the US.

2. Results

2.1. Exploring the Genetic Relationships of Wild Cranberries

The ranges of the two species in our study, Vaccinium macrocarpon, which is mostly restricted to North Central and Eastern North America, and V. oxycoccos, which has a circumboreal distribution, overlap in many areas in the US. Within these areas of sympatry, the species often co-exist on the same site, where they are sometimes difficult to differentiate (Figure 1, Table 1). To explore the genetic relationships both between and within species, we used a dendrogram based on Euclidean genetic distance with an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering method (Figure 2A). We found that both species separate clearly into two main groups, and all the field classifications made by USDA-ARS and USFS botanists were correct (Figure 2A). The UPGMA tree contained one branch with all the accessions identified in the field as V. oxycoccos, and another branch with all the V. macrocarpon individuals. To confirm our findings, we produced a principal component analysis (PCA) of all the populations, in which we also saw a clear separation between the two species (Figure 2B). In the PCA, we observed that the V. macrocarpon samples formed clearer spatial groupings, as seen in the separation of the eastern (Tennessee, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia), central (Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota), and western (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) regions, than those of V. oxycoccos. The one western population identified by USDA-ARS botanists as V. macrocarpon was at Site 34-OWFLBWA in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in Washington state, and its identity was corroborated by the genetic analysis (Figure 2B).
An overall comparison of genetic diversity estimators among all the individuals of the two species demonstrated high levels of heterozygosity. Vaccinium oxycoccos had the highest number of alleles with a total of 881 (n = 539) and a mean value of alleles per locus of 27.51. Also, V. oxycoccos had low levels of inbreeding, as demonstrated by the GIS value of 0.02, as well as a low fixation index (0.09). Overall, V. macrocarpon had a total of number of alleles of 613 (n = 388) and a mean value of 19.15 alleles per locus. Vaccinium macrocarpon also exhibited low levels of inbreeding (GIS- 0.95), but higher values of the fixation index (0.33) than Vaccinium oxycoccos (Table 2).

2.2. Genetic Diversity Estimators and Population Structure of Vaccinium macrocarpon

The mean number of alleles per population* ranged from 2.00 to 7.15 in V. macrocarpon (*values not shown for all populations due to low number of individuals). Also, we observed high levels of all genetic diversity estimators (HO, HS, HT), ranging from 0.21 to 1. Meanwhile, levels of inbreeding were very low, varying from −3.58 to −0.46 (Table 3). The majority of the populations exhibited high values of observed heterozygosity, but low levels of within population heterozygosity.
The number of private alleles per population of V. macrocarpon ranged from 0 to 26. The highest numbers of private alleles were found in populations at Red Run Bog in the Monongahela National Forest in West Virginia (26), Upper Island Lake in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in Wisconsin (24), Sand Point Bog in the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community in Michigan (23), and Cranberry Glades Site 5 in the Monongahela National Forest (17) (Figure 3).
A PCA was performed to understand the genetic relationships among V. macrocarpon populations (Figure 4). We observed a clear differentiation between the samples collected at Fish Lake Bog in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in Washington (34-OWFLBWA), which was genetically identified as V. macrocarpon in the Euclidean distance dendrogram, and samples from other populations. We also observed a separation between populations from central and eastern locations. There was a large spread among the eastern populations, which have historically been considered the most ancient populations of V. macrocarpon [27].
A structure analysis was performed to visualize any potential population groupings (Figure 5). Based on Evanno’s deltaK [28,29], we found that K = 16 was the most likely number of clusters, with the majority of these forming based on their geographical locations. Populations from West Virginia with Site IDs WV-7, WV-8, and WV-(22 and 24) formed distinct clusters, and we observed similar patterns for populations from Minnesota with Site IDs MN-10 and MN-15, from Wisconsin with Site IDs WI-12, WI-16, and WI-26, and from Michigan with Site IDs MI-11, MI-17, and MI-18. The population with Site ID MI-18 from the Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan is highly admixed and the population from Site ID WA-34 in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in Washington shows almost no admixture (Table 1, Figure 5).

2.3. Genetic Diversity Estimators and Population Structure of Vaccinium oxycoccos

The mean number of alleles per population for V. oxycoccos ranged from 2.71 to 11.3. The levels of heterozygosity for all three indexes (HO, HS, HT) ranged from 0.45 to 0.83, while the levels of inbreeding (GIS) ranged from −0.31 to 0.23 (Table 4). The populations with the highest diversity indices were located at the Pond East of Raven Lake (17-PERLOMI) in the Ottawa National Forest in Michigan and Glocke Lake (16-GLCNWI) in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in Wisconsin (Table 1, Table 4).
The analysis of private alleles per population of V. oxycoccos ranged from 1 to 23. The populations with the highest numbers of private alleles included Cranberry Glades site 1 in the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia (23), South Prairie in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest, Washington (19) and Little Crater Meadow in Mount Hood National Forest, Oregon (16) (Figure 6).
A PCA was constructed to observe any groupings among V. oxycoccos samples (Figure 7). As in the V. macrocarpon PCA (Figure 4), we observed a clear geographical separation among the samples from western, central, and eastern locations. The distribution of the data in this PCA showed a closer association of the samples than the PCA for V. macrocarpon, suggesting a closer genetic relationship among V. oxycoccos individuals.
We performed a population structure analysis of the V. oxycoccos populations to better understand if any other grouping was occurring. In the structure analysis K = 2 was the most likely number of clusters for this species (Figure 8). One cluster was composed of all the populations sampled in the Eastern and Central US and the second cluster of the populations sampled in the Western US, with populations in the Quinault Indian Reservation (28-QIROP-WA) in Washington and the Idaho Panhandle National Forest (35-IPHLID) showing some levels of admixture.

2.4. Analysis of Variable Regions in the Cranberry Organellar Genomes

In order to understand genetic relationships between samples from different locations and cultivars (Table S1), we clustered the samples based on Nei’s genetic distance of six organellar genes and two INDELS that have previously shown to be the only variable regions in the organellar genomes of cranberry cultivars and its wild relative V. microcarpum [30,31]. The largest genetic distance of 1 was observed between V. macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos samples collected in Washington and V. macrocarpon samples collected in Wisconsin and Minnesota [M-C-486 (18-SCHMI), M-Ben-Lear, and M-C-207(10-LRLSMN)], with two exceptions being O-W-1014 (30-MHLCMOR) and O-W-1136 (36-MBSWA), which clustered with samples collected in the Eastern US as well as cultivars (Figure 9; Table S1). Additionally, when considering only samples collected in Wisconsin and Minnesota and the Eastern US, genetic distances ranged from 0 (meaning no genetic differentiation was observed) to 0.68.
A PCA (Figure S1) analysis using SSRs identified consistent and clear separation between V. macrocarpon cultivars/native selections and the V. macrocarpon population in the Western US (Site 34-OWFLBWA in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest), suggesting that the western V. macrocarpon population is not genetically closely related to known cultivars/native selections.

3. Discussion

Wild relatives of many crops, including corn, sunflower, wheat, rice, potato, tomato, and banana have been the source of genetic variability and beneficial traits, such as disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance, for crop improvement [32]. In cranberry, many issues that can severely limit production [33], such as frost risk [12] and cranberry fruit rot (Physalospora vaccinii (Shear) Arx and E. Müll.), can be addressed by traits found in wild relatives of cranberry. In order to confront emerging threats while increasing yield and producing excellent quality fruit, wild genetic resources of cranberry should be evaluated, safeguarded, and made available. These resources may hold the genetic variation needed to overcome current and future challenges to cranberry production.

3.1. Genetic Analysis Shows High Differentiation between Morphologically Similar Species

The ranges of Vaccinium macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos overlap in many areas [14], with the species growing together in some locations (Table 1). To better understand the relationships between these two species we studied how samples from wild populations grouped based on genetic distance and morphological identification. We constructed a dendrogram using Euclidean distance with UPGMA clustering (Figure 2A), in which we observed two main clusters, one that contained all V. oxycoccos individuals and one that encompassed all V. macrocarpon samples. To further corroborate our results, a PCA was developed in which we observed similar results for species separation, as well as some geographical clustering within species (Figure 2B). Clear separation between the two species has been previously observed using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [34] and SSR markers [22]. Rodriguez-Bonilla et al. [23] also observed a clear differentiation between species collected in natural areas in the states of Wisconsin and Minnesota, demonstrating the ability of these markers to differentiate between closely related species.
Genetic estimates for both species showed very high levels of heterozygosity (HO, HT, HS) (Table 2), which are comparable to those found by Zalapa et al. [22] and Rodriguez-Bonilla et al. [23], who found high levels of heterozygosity in wild populations in both Wisconsin and Minnesota. These results are supported by cranberry biology, which favors outcrossing through dichogamy and inbreeding fertility reduction [35]. Moreover, natural hybridization can result in new genetic combinations due to chance seedlings [36]. The high levels of genetic diversity present in V. oxycoccos could be related to the polyploid nature of this species, a correlation seen in other polyploid crop wild populations, including cassava and sweet potato [21,37].
When analyzing other parameters of population differentiation, we observed that V. macrocarpon exhibited a much higher fixation index (0.33) and population structure compared to V. oxycoccos (0.09) (Table 2), which appeared to be more panmictic and less differentiated. Many authors believe that some populations of V. macrocarpon are relics of the Pleistocene Ice Age and, therefore, more differentiation among populations is expected [27,35,38].

3.2. Insight into the Genetic Diversity of Wild Populations of Vacciniium macrocarpon

Our results demonstrate that wild populations of cranberry harbor greater diversity than previously observed in other studies using markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) and allozymes [38,39,40]. Codominant markers such as SSRs have also provided great insights into the genetic diversity of several other species, including rice [41], lima beans [42], and sweet potato [21].
In our study, most populations of V. macrocarpon exhibited high levels of genetic diversity, low levels of inbreeding, and moderate levels of within-population heterozygosity (Table 3). Zalapa et al. [22], Schlautman et al. [43] and Rodriguez-Bonilla et al. [23] also found high levels of heterozygosity and low levels of inbreeding in wild populations found in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Other diploid species such as roses have also been found to be highly heterozygous [44]. In wild cranberry populations, the outcrossing preference and the production of chance seedlings in nature likely contributes to the preservation of high levels of genetic diversity [35].
Using PCA, we identified three main clusters: one containing the population in Washington (34-OWFLBWA), one containing samples from the Eastern US, and one composed of all the Central US samples (Figure 4). To further explore the structure of these populations, we performed a cluster analysis, for which K = 16 was our best K based on Evanno’s deltaK method [28] (Figure 5). The observed results were expected based on the results obtained from the fixation index (0.33). Structure results showed a more in-depth differentiation of populations than the one observed in the PCA. We identified several populations from the same states (West Virginia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota) within the main cluster that clustered separately based on Structure (Figure 5). These results suggest that these locations, although still genetically similar, have undergone genetic differentiation, potentially a result of isolation by distance [45].

3.3. Wild Vaccinium macrocarpon from Washington: An Escape or a Unique Population?

V. macrocarpon is naturally distributed mostly in the Eastern US and Canada and has been reported to naturally occur only as far west as Minnesota, with wild populations in the west generally thought to be the result of human introductions from the east. In our study, a population in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in Washington (34-OWFLBWA), was identified through field visual inspection as V. macrocarpon [4], and the identity was confirmed by our genetic analyses. This population was genetically differentiated from cultivars and selections of V. macrocarpon from the eastern and central US (Figure S1). In our Euclidean genetic distance dendrogram this population clearly clustered away from V. oxycoccos (Figure 2A) and also exhibited a clear separation from other V. macrocarpon samples in the PCA (Figure 2B).
Historical records indicate that Vaccinium macrocarpon was introduced to the Western US in the late 1800s [6]. Anthony Chabot was the first to introduce this species to southwestern Washington. McFarlin (which eventually was used as the mother plant to develop Stevens, the most frequently cultivated variety in the US), a native selection from Massachusetts, was the first cultivar to be grown in Oregon and Washington. Because of this history we first theorized that the population in the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (34–OWFLBWA) in Washington could be an escape from cultivation, even though there is no cranberry production east of the Cascades Mountain Range in the state. We performed a PCA with 11 SSR markers using known eastern cultivars and native selections from central and eastern locations, and our population from the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest. We observed a clear spatial separation between the cultivars and native selections and our wild western accession based on PC1. We also observed the expected separation between cultivars and native selections based on PC2. These results suggest that the population in Washington is in fact genetically distinct from known cranberry germplasm (Figure S1).
If the population from the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest in Washington (34–OWFLBWA) was indeed established by escape from cultivation, we would have expected founder and bottleneck effects to have produced low levels of genetic variation [46]. On the contrary, we observed high levels of genetic diversity based on Ho = 0.97 and low inbreeding with GIS = -1.00 (Table 3), which are not consistent with the escape of a cranberry cultivar (i.e., single genotype clone). Additionally, in the V. macrocarpon clustering and population structure analysis, this population consistently clustered separately from the rest of the populations, exhibiting very little admixture (Figure 5). Cranberry cultivation is very localized in Washington, and the Okanogan-Wenatchee population is isolated and not near any commercial or cultivated marshes. Additionally, this population was well differentiated with vast diversity and private alleles (15) (Figure 3). Therefore, based on our data, it is not likely that the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest population was derived from cultivated cranberries originating in the Eastern or Central US.

3.4. Wild Cranberry Populations from Washington Could Help Unravel a Complicated Evolutionary History

Previous work by Diaz-Garcia et al. [31] observed that the cultivar Stevens (which is a cross of eastern and central native cranberry selections) shares almost identical organellar genomes as a V. microcarpum individual collected in the region of the ice-free corridor (IFC) in Alaska. One theory that may help explain these findings is that V. microcarpum from Alaska is the progenitor of the cultivated cranberry. According to this theory, V. microcarpum expanded its range through the North American IFC and then into the deglaciating parts of the Northeast US. This expansion possibly involved human, wildlife, or even water-mediated movement of plants and seeds through the IFC [47]. Based on these findings, and to further understand the relationship between population 34–OWFLBWA and other cranberries from both species, wild and cultivated, we sequenced eight regions that have shown to be the only organellar cranberry variable regions, two of which are plastid single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences with V. microcarpum [30,31]. We used 30 representative samples from our wild collections in National Forests for both V. macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos from across the US from the current study plus five cranberry cultivars and a V. microcarpum accession [31] (Plant Materials are listed in Table S1). Since our wild collections did not include samples from the Northeastern US where the majority of the escaped V. macrocarpon populations now found in the Western US are thought to have originated, we included in our sequence analysis three popular eastern cultivars [wild selections Howes and Early Black (two of the “Big Seven” cultivars)] and Franklin (Early Black x Howes) plus a central cultivar Ben Lear (wild selection), and Stevens (Potters Favorite x McFarlin, both wild selections) and a V. microcarpum accession from Alaska (Table S1).
We observed that samples from the population from the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest shared all analyzed SNPs and INDELS with Stevens, resulting in a genetic distance of 0 between samples of these groups. This result is consistent with the Stevens and V. microcarpum organellar study of Diaz-Garcia et al. [31], which also found near identical organellar genomes in the two species. Therefore, our study supports the idea that the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest population could also be a descendant of populations that moved through the IFC, and also the result of the incomplete lineage sorting that has been previously identified between V. macrocarpon and V. microcarpum [31]. Based on the location of this population, there is a possibility that it was introduced by humans or migratory wildlife through the IFC and changes in climate conditions prevented the expansion of these populations east, since the Fish Lake Bog area is bordered on the west by the Cascade Range and on the east by semi-desert.
These results suggest that this is the first genetically supported report of a unique native V. macrocarpon population west of Minnesota in the US. The existence of this V. macrocarpon population suggests that there could be other unique populations in the western bogs of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. If the ancestors of V. macrocarpon originated from northern areas such as Alaska and spread through the North American IFC, the range of V. macrocarpon could have been widespread at one point. As the glaciers receded and environmental changes ensued, making much of the Western US arid and uninhabitable for cranberry populations, the Eastern and Central US and Canada might have been the only remaining hospitable habitats.
Regardless of origin, our findings indicate that V. macrocarpon populations are more widespread than previously believed and could be present in other western locations of the US and Canada, and at higher latitudes than previously believed. However, a more extensive survey, as well as morphological and genomic analyses of this population and other V. microcarpum accessions, is necessary to elucidate the evolution and migration of both species.

3.5. Insight into the Genetic Diversity of Wild Populations of Vaccinium oxycoccos

The V. oxycoccos populations in our study exhibited high levels of heterozygosity and alleles per population, as well as low levels of inbreeding (Table 4). When compared to V. macrocarpon, V. oxycoccos had higher levels of within-population heterozygosity and total heterozygosity (Table 4). The PCA obtained showed good separation among samples from the different geographical areas, although the grouping was closer than for V. macrocarpon (Figure 7). Similar results were obtained in a study of European V. oxycoccos, in which great genetic variability among two populations was observed [48]. Studies of wild populations of V. oxycoccos in Wisconsin and Minnesota also observed comparable levels of heterozygosity, ranging from 0.7 to 1, and low levels of inbreeding [23].
To better understand the population structure present in V. oxycoccos, we performed a Structure analysis with K = 2 based on Evanno’s deltaK [28] (Figure 8). This analysis showed a clear geographical separation between the eastern/central populations, and western populations, but further differentiation was not observed as expected from the observed fixation index (0.09). A similar structure has been shown in switchgrass ecotypes from different regions clustered based on geographical distribution [49]. We observed some levels of admixture in individuals from a population in the Idaho Panhandle National Forest (35-IPHLID). These results could be due to human–plant exchange or migrating birds spreading seeds west or east.

3.6. Understanding Genetic Variation in Cranberry and Its Implications for Conservation

Our main goal was to understand the genetic variation of wild cranberry species in National Forests to provide the USDA-ARS and US Forest Service with the genetic information needed to plan conservation actions for these important crop wild relatives. We looked at three diversity and uniqueness indicators: private alleles, heterozygosity, and population structure. Private alleles are those found in one population among a group of populations, and are a great measurement of uniqueness [50].
We observed that for Vaccinium macrocarpon, the populations on National Forests with the highest number of private alleles were Red Run Bog in Monongahela National Forest in West Virginia (26), Upper Island Lake in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest in Wisconsin (24), and Cranberry Glades site 5 in the Monongahela National Forest in West Virginia (17) (Figure 3). Another population not in a National Forest (Sand Point Bog in the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community) also had a high number of private alleles. For V. oxycoccos, the populations with the highest number of private alleles were Cranberry Glades site 1 in the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia (23), South Prairie in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest, Washington (19) and Little Crater Meadow in the Mount Hood National Forest, Oregon (16) (Figure 6). These populations also demonstrated high levels of genetic variation based on their heterozygosity values (Table 3, Table 4). The combination of these population genetic parameters, as well as the population structure, provides us with insights about which populations have high or unique genetic diversity and should be considered when designating in situ genetic reserves for conservation of wild cranberry in National Forests.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Plant materials were collected by ARS and USFS botanists and technicians (Figure 1). In order to locate populations of Vaccinium macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos, online herbarium and germplasm records in the USDA National Plant Germplasm System (GRIN-Global), the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, the Global Crop Wild Relative Occurrence Database, the Genesys plant genetic resources portal, the Botanic Gardens Conservation International PlantSearch database, and the Consortium of Midwest Herbaria were searched for known populations on National Forests throughout the US. Scientific staff at the National Forests provided additional information on locations of populations. Collections from two other sites located near National Forests were also included in the analysis. The collection sites ranged from a small seep (14 m2) supporting the population at the southernmost latitude (5-BBKPNC) to large bogs and fens covering hundreds of thousands of square meters. The elevation of populations ranged from 183 m (11-SPBMI) to 1773 m (5-BBKPNC) for V. macrocarpon and from 114 m (28-QIROPWA) to 1196 m (9-BeRBWV) for V. oxycoccos. In the Eastern US, V. macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos were often found growing together on the same site. In the Western US, all populations were V. oxycoccos, except one that was determined to be V. macrocarpon.
Multiple samples of leaf tissue were collected at each site. Each sample was an upright (i.e., reproductive branch) or a runner (i.e., vegetative branch) containing at least 20 leaves from a single plant. When found together at the same site, V. macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos were sampled separately. Following the technique utilized by Zalapa et al. [22], samples within each species were collected at least 5 m apart to reduce the likelihood of collecting the same clone more than once. As much as possible of the entire population was covered by taking samples in a grid pattern. Latitude and longitude were determined for each sample and recorded on the paper coin envelope holding the sample. All samples for each species at a site were placed in a large paper envelope.
Each collection site was documented with location, physical characteristics, associated species, and descriptions of the populations and plants being sampled (available upon request). Latitude, longitude, and altitude were recorded using a Garmin GPSMAP 64st or other global positioning unit and/or altimeter. The geodetic datum WGS 84 was used.
Herbarium vouchers were deposited in the USDA National Arboretum in Washington, D.C. and the USDA National Germplasm Repository in Corvallis, Oregon.

4.2. DNA Extraction

Plant materials were provided to the USDA-ARS, Cranberry Genetics and Genomics Lab at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, for genetic analysis. Genomic DNA extractions for sequencing and diversity analysis were performed using leaf tissue per a CTAB method [51] modified in our laboratory to isolate high-quality, clean DNA. A total of 10–20 mg of frozen tissue were hand-ground using liquid nitrogen and then transferred to a 2.0 mL tube. 700 μL of 2% CTAB extraction buffer (20 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1.4 M NaCl, 2% CTAB) was added to the tube and then mixed. The solution was then incubated at 65 °C for 45 min. After incubation, 400 μL of a chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) solution was added to the tubes and further mixed gently by inversion. Samples were then centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm; 500 μL of the supernatant was then transferred to a fresh 1.5 mL tube containing 50 μL of 10% CTAB buffer and then mixed. We added 750 μL of cold isopropanol (100%), and then samples were incubated from 2 to 48 h at −20 °C. Samples were then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and the resulting pellet air-dried for 5 min. The pellet was then washed with 700 μL of cold 70% ethanol, vortexed, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 4 min. The ethanol was discarded and the pellet air-dried for approximately 24 h. The DNA was then re-suspended in 100 μL TE 10:1 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) plus 5 μL of ribonuclease (RNAse 10 mg mL−1) in each tube, and was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h prior to storage at − 20 °C.

4.3. Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Conditions and Analysis of Diversity

A total of 32 markers previously designed and assessed for transferability between V. macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos were used in this study [7,24,52,53] (Table S1). Markers proven to have a consistently clear pattern of amplification across species were chosen, and at least two markers per cranberry linkage group previously known to exhibit Mendelian segregation patterns were selected for this study. PCR protocols used in this study were as described by Rodriguez-Bonilla et al. [23].
For fragment analysis, a total of 25 μL f PCR product and 1500 μL of formamide (Hi-Di Formamide from Life Technologies) were added per plate of 96 wells. The poolplexed mixture was sent to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center DNA sequencing facility for fragment analysis using an ABI 3730 fluorescent sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Allele genotyping was performed using GeneMarker v2.63 (SoftGenetics LLC, State College, PA, USA).
The allelic information obtained from genotyping was formatted as a GenAlEx [54] input file. This file was then converted to a geneclone object to run in the R statistical software [55] package Population Genetics in R (poppr) [56] to estimate the observed number of private alleles (PA). Calculations of genetic diversity statistics, such as number of alleles, HO, G’st(Nei), and GIS, were obtained from the software GenoDive [57]. PCA was performed converting a geneclone matrix into a genind object in adegenet [58]. Missing data (NA) values were replaced with mean allele frequencies. To visualize the PCAs, the packages ggplot2 and factoextra were used [59,60]. For the dendrograms, the R stats package [55] was used to obtain Euclidean genetic distance and clustering. The dendrograms were then visualized using the packages dendextend [61] and circlize [62]. Population structure analysis was performed using the Structure 2.3.4 with K’s 1 to 36, 150,000 MCMC (Markov Chain Monte Carlo), and 50,000 burn-in period [63]. The estimations of deltaK were obtained with Structure Harvester [28,29]. Data obtained from Structure was processed and visualized using the R package pophelper 2.2.9 [64]. To geographically visualize our forest locations we used the package maps [65].

4.4. Analysis of Organelle Sequence Data and Genetic Relatedness Analysis

To explore organellar genetic relatedness among populations from different locations in the US, we compared samples from the current study (n = 30: 15 each for V. macrocarpon and V. microcarpum) to cultivated cranberry samples (n = 5) and V. microcarpum samples (n = 1). Plant materials used in this analysis are listed in Table S1. Primers were designed to amplify eight previously observed variable regions in the plastid and mitochondrial genomes of V. macrocarpon cultivars and V. microcarpum as identified by Diaz-Garcia et al. [31] and Fajardo et al. [30] using the Geneious Prime® 2020.0.3 software. We sequenced six regions that have been shown to be the only organellar variable regions (four regions containing SNPs and two INDELs (insertion/deletion)) observed between the V. macrocarpon cultivars Ben Lear, HyRed, and Stevens [30]. We also included two other regions containing SNPs found between the organelles of cultivar Stevens and V. microcarpum [31].
PCR Reactions for Sanger sequencing contained 10.5 µL of 1x Jumpstart RedTaq Ready Mix (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2.0 ul of 50 ng/ul DNA, 1 µL of 5 µM forward primer, 1 µL of 5 µM reverse primer. Thermocycling conditions consisted of 94 °C for 3 min, [94 °C 15s, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min] 33, 72 °C for 30 min, 4 ∞. PCR products were submitted to the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center for Sanger sequencing both ways (forward and reverse).
The forward and reverse sequences obtained from Sanger Sequencing were aligned using a pairwise alignment, using the Geneious Alignment tool (global alignment with free end gaps). Aligned sequences were then trimmed and a consensus sequence was created in order to perform a multiple alignment of all individuals based on similarity using the Clustal Omega tool found on the Geneious Prime® 2020.0.3 software. Sequences were then batch exported in FASTA format for genetic distance analysis.
Sanger sequence reads for the six organellar genes were merged into a single FASTA file for each sample using the R package Biostrings v2.50.2 [66]. Sequences were then converted to a genlight object using adegenet, and Nei’s genetic distance [67] between each sample was calculated using Stampp [68]. The resulting pairwise genetic distance matrix was then plotted in ggmap [69] to visualize relationships between samples.

5. Conclusions

Our study elucidated the genetic diversity and population structure of wild populations of two species of wild cranberry located mainly in National Forests. The populations are distributed across the US and exhibit unique allelic combinations that could be useful for breeding, especially since cranberry is a relatively new crop that has not been the subject of much artificial selection. These results will contribute to decisions on which populations should be prioritized for conservation action, including site management and collection of germplasm, by the USDA Forest Service and Agricultural Research Service. We were also able to identify a unique population of V. macrocarpon outside its native range, which could be useful in better understanding the evolution of this complex section of the genus Vaccinium.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1446/s1, Figure S1: PCA of population 34-OWFLBWA population and cranberry cultivars, Table S1: Additional data referring to SSR and organelle sequences and samples used in Figure 9.

Author Contributions

L.R.-B., K.A.W., and J.Z. conceived and planned the experiments. K.A.W. coordinated and participated in the plant collections, L.R.B., E.W., D.M., and F.R.B., carried out the genetic analyses. L.R.B., A.M., K.C., and L.D.-G. analyzed the data and contributed to the interpretation of the results. L.R.B., K.A.W., and J.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the USDA-ARS (Project no. 5090-21220-004-00-D provided to J. Zalapa); Ocean Spray Cranberries, the Wisconsin Cranberry Growers Association, and the Cranberry Institute. The collection of samples in the field was supported by USDA-ARS Project No. 8042-2100-272-00D and 8042-2100-280-00D.

Acknowledgments

K.A. Williams would like to thank Ned Garvey (USDA-ARS retired) and Larry Stritch (USDA-USFS retired) for their vision in establishing collaborations on conservation of crop wild relatives in the US that led to this project. The authors want to thank the US Forest Service for assisting with locating populations, providing permits and collecting some of the samples. L. Rodríguez-Bonilla wants to thank the University of Wisconsin–Madison SciMed Graduate Research Scholars (GRS) funding. J. Zalapa would like to express his gratitude through Ps 136:1. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers who helped enhance the quality of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Greene, S.L.; Khoury, C.K.; Williams, K.A. Wild Plant Genetic Resources in North America: An Overview. In North American Crop Wild Relatives, Volume 1: Conservation Strategies; Greene, S.L., Williams, K.A., Khoury, C.K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3–31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Khoury, C.K.; Greene, S.; Wiersema, J.; Maxted, N.; Jarvis, A.; Struik, P.C. An inventory of crop wild relatives of the United States. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 1496–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jost, L.; Archer, F.; Flanagan, S.; Gaggiotti, O.; Hoban, S.; Latch, E. Differentiation measures for conservation genetics. Evol. Appl. 2018, 11, 1139–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Vander Kloet, S.P. The Genus Vaccinium in North America; Agriculture Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Song, G.-Q.; Hancock, J.F. Vaccinium. In Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Temperate Fruits; Kole, C., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 197–221. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eck, P. The American Cranberry; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  7. Schlautman, B.; Covarrubias-Pazaran, G.; Diaz-Garcia, L.; Iorizzo, M.; Polashock, J.; Grygleski, E.; Vorsa, N.; Zalapa, J. Construction of a High-Density American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) Composite Map Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing for Multi-pedigree Linkage Mapping. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 1177–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vorsa, N.; Zalapa, J. Domestication, Genetics, and Genomics of the American Cranberry. Plant Breed. Rev. 2019, 43, 279–310. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yan, X.; Murphy, B.T.; Hammond, G.B.; Vinson, J.A.; Neto, C.C. Antioxidant activities and antitumor screening of extracts from cranberry fruit (Vaccinium macrocarpon). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5844–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McKay, D.L.; Blumberg, J.B. Cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Nutr. Rev. 2007, 65, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Brown, P.N.; Turi, C.E.; Shipley, P.R.; Murch, S.J. Comparisons of large (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) and small (Vaccinium oxycoccos L.; Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) cranberry in British Columbia by phytochemical determination, antioxidant potential, and metabolomic profiling with chemometric analysis. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roper, T.R.; Vorsa, N. Cranberry: Botany and Horticulture. In Horticultural Reviews; Janick, J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Oxford, UK, 1997; pp. 215–249. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vorsa, N.; Johnson-Cicalese, J. American Cranberry. In Fruit Breeding; Badenes, M.L., Byrne, D.H., Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 191–223. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vander Kloet, S.P. The Taxonomy of Vaccinium § Oxycoccus. Rhodora 1983, 85, 1–43. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacquemart, A.-L. Vaccinium oxycoccos L. (Oxycoccus Palustris Pers.) and Vaccinium Microcarpum (Turcz. ex Rupr.) Schmalh. (Oxycoccus Microcarpus Turcz. ex Rupr.). J. Ecol. 1997, 85, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Areškevičiūtė, J.; Paulauskas, A.; Česonienė, L.; Daubaras, R. Genetic characterisation of wild cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) from Čepkeliai reserve by the RAPD method. Biologija 2006, 1, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mao, D.; Yu, L.; Chen, D.; Chen, D.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chen, C. Multiple cold resistance loci confer the high cold tolerance adaptation of Dongxiang wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) to its high-latitude habitat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128, 1359–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hokanson, S.C.; Lamboy, W.F.; Szewc-McFadden, A.K.; McFerson, J.R. Microsatellite (SSR) variation in a collection of Malus (apple) species and hybrids. Euphytica 2001, 118, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salehi, M.; Arzani, A.; Talebi, M.; Rokhzadi, A. Genetic diversity of wheat wild relatives using SSR markers. Genetika 2018, 50, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ali, A.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.-D.; Chen, J.-L.; Gao, S.-J. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of Saccharum and Erianthus genera using microsatellite (SSR) markers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rodriguez-Bonilla, L.; Cuevas, H.E.; Montero-Rojas, M.; Bird-Pico, F.; Luciano-Rosario, D.; Siritunga, D. Assessment of genetic diversity of sweet potato in Puerto Rico. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e116184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zalapa, J.E.; Bougie, T.C.; Bougie, T.A.; Schlautman, B.J.; Wiesman, E.; Guzman, A.; Fajardo, D.A.; Steffan, S.; Smith, T. Clonal diversity and genetic differentiation revealed by SSR markers in wild Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2015, 166, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodríguez-Bonilla, L.; Bonilla, F.R.; Matusinec, D.; Wiesman, E.; Schoville, S.D.; Atucha, A.; Zalapa, J. Exploring the Genetic Diversity of Wild Cranberry Populations in the Upper Midwestern United States. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 2413–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rodriguez-Bonilla, L.; Rohde, J.; Matusinec, D.; Zalapa, J. Cross-transferability analysis of SSR markers developed from the American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) to other Vaccinium species of agricultural importance. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2019, 66, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Segarra-Moragues, J.G.; Palop-Esteban, M.; González-Candelas, F.; Catalán, P. On the verge of extinction: Genetics of the critically endangered Iberian plant species, Borderea chouardii (Dioscoreaceae) and implications for conservation management. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 969–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marfil, C.F.; Hidalgo, V.; Masuelli, R.W. In situ conservation of wild potato germplasm in Argentina: Example and possibilities. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2015, 3, 461–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Stewart, C.N.; Neal Stewart, C.; Nilsen, E.T. Phenotypic Plasticity and Genetic Variation of Vaccinium macrocarpon, the American Cranberry. I. Reaction Norms of Clones from Central and Marginal Populations in a Common Garden. Int. J. Plant Sci. 1995, 156, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Earl, D.A.; von Holdt, B.M. Structure Harvester: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2012, 4, 359–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fajardo, D.; Schlautman, B.; Steffan, S.; Polashock, J.; Vorsa, N.; Zalapa, J. The American cranberry mitochondrial genome reveals the presence of selenocysteine (tRNA-Sec and SECIS) insertion machinery in land plants. Gene 2014, 536, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Diaz-Garcia, L.; Rodriguez-Bonilla, L.; Rohde, J.; Smith, T.; Zalapa, J. Pacbio Sequencing Reveals Identical Organelle Genomes between American Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) and a Wild Relative. Genes 2019, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dempewolf, H.; Baute, G.; Anderson, J.; Kilian, B.; Smith, C.; Guarino, L. Past and future use of wild relatives in crop breeding. Crop Sci. 2017, 57, 1070–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gallardo, R.K.; Klingthong, P.; Zhang, Q.; Polashock, J.; Atucha, A.; Zalapa, J.; Rodriguez-Soana, C.; Vorsa, N.; Iorizzo, M. Breeding Trait Priorities of the Cranberry Industry in the United States and Canada. HortScience 2018, 53, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Smith, T.W.; Walinga, C.; Wang, S.; Kron, P.; Suda, J.; Zalapa, J. Evaluating the relationship between diploid and tetraploid Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae) in eastern Canada. Botany 2015, 93, 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bruederle, L.P.; Hugan, M.S.; Dignan, J.M.; Vorsa, N. Genetic variation in natural populations of the large cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.(Ericaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1996, 123, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Llácer, G.; Badenes, M.L.; Calvo, J.M. Plant material of loquat in Mediterranean countries. In: Proc. First Int. Loquat Symp. Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens 2003, 58, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  37. Montero-Rojas, M.; Correa, A.M.; Siritunga, D. Molecular differentiation and diversity of cassava (Manihot esculenta) taken from 162 locations across Puerto Rico and assessed with microsatellite markers. AoB Plants 2011, 2011, plr010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Stewart, C.N.; Excoffier, L. Assessing population genetic structure and variability with RAPD data: Application to Vaccinium macrocarpon (American Cranberry). J. Evol. Biol. 1996, 9, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Novy, R.G.; Vorsa, N. Identification of intracultivar genetic heterogeneity in cranberry using silver-stained RAPDs. HortScience 1995, 30, 600–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mahy, G.; Bruederle, L.P.; Connors, B.; Van Hofwegen, M.; Vorsa, N. Allozyme evidence for genetic autopolyploidy and high genetic diversity in tetraploid cranberry, Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kalyan Chakravarthi, B.; Naravaneni, R. SSR marker based DNA fingerprinting and diversity study in rice (Oryza sativa. L). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 684–688. [Google Scholar]
  42. Montero-Rojas, M.; Ortiz, M.; Beaver, J.S.; Siritunga, D. Genetic, morphological and cyanogen content evaluation of a new collection of Caribbean Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) landraces. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 2241–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schlautman, B.; Covarrubias-Pazaran, G.; Rodriguez-Bonilla, L.; Hummer, K.; Bassil, N.; Smith, T.; Zalapa, J. Genetic diversity and cultivar variants in the National Clonal Germplasm Repository cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton) collection. J. Genet. 2018, 97, 1339–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Raymond, O.; Gouzy, J.; Just, J.; Badouin, H.; Verdenaud, M.; Lemainque, A.; Vergne, P.; Moja, S.; Choisne, N.; Pont, C.; et al. The Rosa genome provides new insights into the domestication of modern roses. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 772–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van Strien, M.J.; Holderegger, R.; Van Heck, H.J. Isolation-by-distance in landscapes: Considerations for landscape genetics. Heredity 2015, 114, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Nei, M.; Maruyama, T.; Chakraborty, R. The Bottleneck Effect and Genetic Variability in Populations. Evolution 1975, 29, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heintzman, P.D.; Froese, D.; Ives, J.W.; Soares, A.E.; Zazula, G.D.; Letts, B.; Andrews, T.D.; Driver, J.C.; Hall, E.; Hare, P.G.; et al. Bison phylogeography constrains dispersal and viability of the Ice Free Corridor in western Canada. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8057–8063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Česonienė, L.; Daubaras, R.; Paulauskas, A.; Zukauskiene, J.; Zych, M. Morphological and genetic diversity of European cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos L.; Ericaceae) clones in Lithuanian reserves. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2013, 82, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Zalapa, J.; Jakubowski, A.R.; Price, D.L.; Acharya, A.; Wei, Y.; Brummer, C.; Kaeppler, S.M.; Casler, M.D. Natural hybrids and gene flow between upland and lowland switchgrass. Crop Sci. 2011, 51, 2626–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Szpiech, Z.A.; Rosenberg, N.A. On the size distribution of private microsatellite alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2011, 80, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. CTAB DNA extraction in plants. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fajardo, D.; Morales, J.; Zhu, H.; Steffan, S.; Harbu, R.; Bassil, N.; Hummer, K.; Polashock, J.; Vorsa, N.; Zalapa, J. Discrimination of American cranberry cultivars and assessment of clonal heterogeneity using microsatellite markers. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 31, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schlautman, B.; Fajardo, D.; Bougie, T.; Wiesman, E.; Polashock, J.; Vorsa, N.; Steffan, S.; Zalapa, J. Development and validation of 697 novel polymorphic genomic and EST-SSR markers in the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.). Molecules 2015, 20, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kamvar, Z.N.; Tabima, J.F.; Grünwald, N.J. Poppr: An R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2014, 2, e281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Meirmans, P.G.; Van Tienderen, P.H. Genotype and Genodive: Two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 792–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jombart, T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Wickham, H. ggplot2. WIREs Comp. Stat. 2011, 3, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kassambara, A.; Mundt, F. Package Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses; Comprehensive R Arch. Network: Vienna, Austria, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  61. Galili, T. Dendextend: An R package for visualizing, adjusting and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3718–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gu, Z.; Gu, L.; Eils, R.; Schlesner, M.; Brors, B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2811–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar]
  64. Francis, R.M. Pophelper: An R package and web app to analyse and visualize population structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2017, 17, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Becker, R.A.; Wilks, A.R.; Brownrigg, R.; Minka, T.P.; Deckmyn, A. Maps: Draw Geographical Maps; R Package Version 2. 2013. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/maps/index.html (accessed on 21 October 2020).
  66. Pagès, H.; Aboyoun, P.; Gentleman, R.; DebRoy, S. Biostrings: Efficient Manipulation of Biological Strings; R Package Version 2.54.0. 2019. Available online: https://bioconductor.riken.jp/packages/3.10/bioc/html/Biostrings.html (accessed on 21 October 2020).
  67. Nei, M. Genetic Distance between Populations. Am. Nat. 1972, 106, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pembleton, L.W.; Cogan, N.O.I.; Forster, J.W. StAMPP: An R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013, 13, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kahle, D.; Wickham, H. Ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2. R J. 2013, 5, 144–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Plants 09 01446 g001 550
Figure 1. National forests and adjacent locations with populations of Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos included in the study.
Figure 1. National forests and adjacent locations with populations of Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos included in the study.
Plants 09 01446 g001
Plants 09 01446 g002 550
Figure 2. (A,B) Wild cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos) species separation based on genetic distance.
Figure 2. (A,B) Wild cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos) species separation based on genetic distance.
Plants 09 01446 g002
Plants 09 01446 g003 550
Figure 3. Number of private alleles per population of Vaccinium macrocarpon.
Figure 3. Number of private alleles per population of Vaccinium macrocarpon.
Plants 09 01446 g003
Plants 09 01446 g004 550
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Vaccinium macrocarpon populations.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Vaccinium macrocarpon populations.
Plants 09 01446 g004
Plants 09 01446 g005 550
Figure 5. Structure analysis of Vaccinium macrocarpon populations (K = 16).
Figure 5. Structure analysis of Vaccinium macrocarpon populations (K = 16).
Plants 09 01446 g005
Plants 09 01446 g006 550
Figure 6. Number of private alleles per population of Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Figure 6. Number of private alleles per population of Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Plants 09 01446 g006
Plants 09 01446 g007 550
Figure 7. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Vaccinium oxycoccos populations.
Figure 7. Principal component analysis (PCA) of Vaccinium oxycoccos populations.
Plants 09 01446 g007
Plants 09 01446 g008 550
Figure 8. Structure analysis of Vaccinium oxycoccos populations (K = 2).
Figure 8. Structure analysis of Vaccinium oxycoccos populations (K = 2).
Plants 09 01446 g008
Plants 09 01446 g009 550
Figure 9. Genetic distance of Vaccinium macrocarpon cultivars/wild accessions (M), wild Vaccinium oxycoccos (O) and Vaccinium microcarpum from across the US (west = W, east = E, and central = C) based on organellar single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Figure 9. Genetic distance of Vaccinium macrocarpon cultivars/wild accessions (M), wild Vaccinium oxycoccos (O) and Vaccinium microcarpum from across the US (west = W, east = E, and central = C) based on organellar single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Plants 09 01446 g009
Table
Table 1. Sample Collection Locations for Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Table 1. Sample Collection Locations for Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Site IDSpeciesSample IDsStateNational Forest/
Administrative Area		LocationLatitudeLongitudeRegional Group
2-GPVA
(VA-2) *		V. macrocarponVAC2013 (4–23)VirginiaGeorge Washington National ForestGreen Pond37.94087−79.0526East
3-JBCTN
(TN-3) *		V. macrocarponVAC2013 (25–40)TennesseeCherokee National ForestJohn’s Bog36.52908−81.964East
4-OBCTN
(TN-4) *		V. macrocarponVAC2013 (41–47)TennesseeCherokee National ForestOsborne Bog36.48826−81.9652East
5-BBKPNC
(NC-5) *		V. macrocarponVAC2013 (48–53)North CarolinaPisgah National ForestBlack Balsam Knob35.32943−82.8782East
6-IGSPNC
(NC-6) *		V. macrocarponVAC2013 (54–69)North CarolinaPisgah National ForestInvestor Gap Seep35.34345−82.8697East
7-BRBWV
(WV-7) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		WV2014-2 (1–18)
WV2014-1 (1–19)		West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestBig Run Bog39.11805−79.5845East
8-RRBWV
(WV-8) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		WV2014-4 (1–24)
WV2014-3 (1–10)		West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestRed Run Bog39.07227−79.4784East
9-BeRBWV
(WV-9) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		WV2014-6 (1–2)
WV2014-5 (1–26)		West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestBear Rocks Bog39.06535−79.3051East
10-LRLSMN
(MN-10) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		VAC2015-M (165–184)
VAC2015-O (145–164)		MinnesotaSuperior National ForestLittle Rice Lake47.70847−92.4411Central
11-SPBMI
(MI-11) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		VAC2015-M (220–254)
VAC2015-O (185–219)		MichiganKeweenaw Bay Indian CommunitySand Point Bog46.79143−88.4669Central
12-ALCNWI
(WI-12) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		VAC2015-M (278–298)
VAC2015-O (255–277)		WisconsinChequamegon-Nicolet National ForestAtkins Lake45.64951−89.0397Central
13-ANFPA
(PA-13) *		V. macrocarponVAC2015-M (299–336)PennsylvaniaAllegheny National ForestAlong both sides of FR320, approximately 0.2 miles south of junction with FR45541.81581−78.7341East
14-RLSNMN
(MN-14) *		V. oxycoccosVAC2015-O (337–356)MinnesotaSuperior National ForestRice Lake47.56709−92.3689Central
15-CLSNMN
(MN-15) *		V. macrocarponVAC2015-M (357–381)MinnesotaSuperior National ForestCranberry Lake47.51161−92.0166Central
16-GLCNWI
(WI-16) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		VAC2015-M (382–402)
VAC2015-O (403–422)		WisconsinChequamegon-Nicolet National ForestGlocke Lake45.33362−88.5702Central
17-PERLOMI
(MI-17) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		USFS-ONF-2015-1-1, USFS-ONF-2015- 2 (1–16)
USFS-ONF-2015-2 (1o–160)		MichiganOttawa National ForestPond east of Raven Lake46.26263−89.21718Central
18-SCHMI
(MI-18) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		USFS-HNF-2015-1 (1–8, 12–17, 29–35, 38–47)
USFS-HNF-2015-1 (9–11, 18–28, 36–37, 48)		MichiganHiawatha National ForestSouth side FR2268 to east of H94, 0.8 miles south of Stutts Creek crossing46.29175−86.455Central
19-NHHMI
(MI-19) *		V. macrocarponUSFS-HNF-2015-2 (1– 16)MichiganHiawatha National ForestNorth of Haywire Trail, unmarked two track West of Highway 9446.29177−86.454Central
20-WFRHMI
(MI-20) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-HNF-2015-3 (1–24)MichiganHiawatha National ForestWest Side of FR13, north of FR244746.1807−86.4242Central
21-ESHHMI
(MI-21) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-HNF-2015-4 (1–24)MichiganHiawatha National ForestEast Side of Highway 13, north of FR202046.06647−86.6438Central
22-CG1MWV
(WV-22) *		V. macrocarpon
V. oxycoccos		USFS-MNF-2015-1-(11–12), USFS-MNF-2015-1-13 (k-p)
USFS-MNF-2015-1- (1–10), USFS-MNF-2015-1 13 (a-j), (USFS-MNF-2015-1 (14–22)		West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestCranberry Glades 138.19939−80.272East
23-CG7MWV
(WV-23) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-MNF-2015-7 (1–16)West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestCranberry Glades 738.20603−80.2773East
24-CG5MWV
(WV-24) *		V. macrocarponUSFS-MNF-2015-5 (1–17)West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestCranberry Glades 538.19943−80.2654East
25-CG4MWV
(WV-25) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-MNF-2015-4 (1–20)West VirginiaMonongahela National ForestCranberry Glades 438.20012−80.2651East
26-UILCNWI
(WV-26) *		V. macrocarponUSFS-CNNF-2015-4 (1–17)WisconsinChequamegon-Nicolet National ForestUpper Island Lake45.25023−88.5576Central
27-CPMHWOR
(OR-27) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-MHNF-2017-1 (1–49)OregonMount Hood National ForestCamas Prairie45.1382−121.566West
28-QIROPWA
(WA-28) *		V. oxycoccosQIR-2017-1 (1–24)WashingtonQuinault Indian ReservationOtook Prairie47.41137−124.155West
29-GPSPWA
(WA-29) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-GPNF-2017-2 (1–49)WashingtonGifford Pinchot National ForestSouth Prairie45.90969−121.699West
30-MHLCMOR
(OR-30) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-MHNF-2017-2 (1–16)OregonMount Hood National ForestLittle Crater Meadow45.14545−121.741West
31-GPMMWA
(WA-31) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-GPNF-2017-1 (1–7)WashingtonGifford Pinchot National ForestMcClellan Meadows45.99633−121.89West
32-OCBVWA
(WA-32) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-OLNF-2017-1 (1–29)WashingtonOlympic National ForestCranberry Bog Botanical Area47.98635−123.114West
33-IPHLWA
(WA-33) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-IPMF-2018-1 (1–13)WashingtonIdaho Panhandle National ForestHuff Lake48.74059−117.063West
34-OWFLBWA
(WA-34) *		V. macrocarponUSFS-OWNF-2018-1 (1–36)WashingtonOkanogan-WenatcheeFish Lake Bog47.8253−120.723West
35-IPHLID
(ID-35) *		V. oxycoccosUSFS-IPNF-2018-2 (1–19)IdahoIdaho Panhandle National ForestHager Lake48.59713−116.97West
36-MBSWA
(WA-36) *		V. oxycoccosUSFSMBSNF-2018-1 (1–15)WashingtonMt. Baker-SnoqualmieMorovitz Wetland Complex48.74092−121.674West
* Shorthand site IDs re used in the population structure analysis (Figure 5; Figure 8).
Table
Table 2. Genetic diversity statistics for Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Table 2. Genetic diversity statistics for Vaccinium macrocarpon and Vaccinium oxycoccos.
V. macrocarponV. oxycoccos
Total alleles613881
N 1388539
Num 219.1527.51
Ho 30.990.71
Hs 40.510.72
Ht 50.750.80
Gis 6−0.950.02
G’st(Nei) 70.330.09
1 Number of samples, 2 Mean number of alleles, 3 Observed heterozygosity, 4 Heterozygosity within populations, 5 Total heterozygosity, 6 Inbreeding Coefficient, 7 Nei’s fixation index.
Table
Table 3. Genetic diversity statistics per population of Vaccinium macrocarpon.
Table 3. Genetic diversity statistics per population of Vaccinium macrocarpon.
Site IDN 1Num 2Ho 3Hs 4Ht 5Gis 6
2-GPVA113.251.000.430.43−1.28
3-JBCTN162.311.000.230.23−3.20
4-OBCTN72.401.000.330.33−2.01
5-BBKPNC62.001.000.210.21−3.58
6-IGSPNC152.201.000.330.33−2.03
7-BRBWV184.100.990.550.55−0.79
8-RRBWV245.730.990.660.66−0.48
10-LRLSMN204.461.000.550.55−0.81
11-SPBMI317.151.000.680.68−0.46
12-ALCNWI215.311.000.620.62−0.60
13-ANFPA383.451.000.520.52−0.89
15-CLSNMN254.641.000.600.60−0.65
16-GLCNWI215.371.000.600.60−0.66
17-PERLOMI174.751.000.510.51−0.93
18-SCHMI316.401.000.630.63−0.56
19-NHHMI153.961.000.510.51−0.94
24-CG5MWV165.340.990.620.62−0.58
26-UILCNWI146.061.000.660.66−0.49
34-OWFLBWA353.120.970.480.48−1.00
1 Number of samples, 2 Mean number of alleles, 3 Observed heterozygosity, 4 Heterozygosity within populations, 5 Total heterozygosity, 6 Inbreeding coefficient.
Table
Table 4. Genetic diversity statistics per population of Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Table 4. Genetic diversity statistics per population of Vaccinium oxycoccos.
Site IDN 1Num 2Ho 3Hs 4Ht 5Gis 6
7-BRBWV196.430.750.730.73−0.02
8-RRBWV104.750.720.830.830.12
9-BeRBWV268.120.640.740.740.12
10-LRLSMN208.810.690.740.740.06
11-SPBMI3211.30.690.770.770.10
12-ALCNWI2311.00.700.770.770.09
14-RLSNMN199.160.700.780.780.10
16-GLCNWI209.810.790.790.79−0.00
17-PERLOMI169.060.800.770.77−0.03
18-SCHMI166.500.730.700.70−0.03
20-WFRHMI249.650.740.770.770.03
21-ESHHMI259.650.750.760.760.01
22-CG1MWV3010.30.740.760.760.01
23-CG7MWV168.780.770.760.76−0.01
25-CG4MWV209.930.750.770.770.02
27-CPMHWOR497.250.680.650.65−0.05
28-QIROPWA244.660.450.590.590.23
29-GPSPWA499.450.750.690.69−0.08
30-MHLCMOR166.250.700.660.66−0.07
31-GPMMWA75.060.760.690.69−0.11
32-OCBVWA299.540.710.680.68−0.03
33-IPHLWA132.710.670.510.51−0.31
35-IPHLID194.780.720.640.64−0.11
36-MBSWA154.960.710.650.65−0.10
1 Number of samples, 2 Mean number of alleles, 3 Observed heterozygosity, 4 Heterozygosity within populations, 5 Total heterozygosity, 6 Inbreeding coefficient.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodriguez-Bonilla, L.; Williams, K.A.; Rodríguez Bonilla, F.; Matusinec, D.; Maule, A.; Coe, K.; Wiesman, E.; Diaz-Garcia, L.; Zalapa, J. The Genetic Diversity of Cranberry Crop Wild Relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with Special Emphasis on National Forests. Plants 2020, 9, 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111446

AMA Style

Rodriguez-Bonilla L, Williams KA, Rodríguez Bonilla F, Matusinec D, Maule A, Coe K, Wiesman E, Diaz-Garcia L, Zalapa J. The Genetic Diversity of Cranberry Crop Wild Relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with Special Emphasis on National Forests. Plants. 2020; 9(11):1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111446

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodriguez-Bonilla, Lorraine, Karen A. Williams, Fabian Rodríguez Bonilla, Daniel Matusinec, Andrew Maule, Kevin Coe, Eric Wiesman, Luis Diaz-Garcia, and Juan Zalapa. 2020. "The Genetic Diversity of Cranberry Crop Wild Relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with Special Emphasis on National Forests" Plants 9, no. 11: 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111446

APA Style

Rodriguez-Bonilla, L., Williams, K. A., Rodríguez Bonilla, F., Matusinec, D., Maule, A., Coe, K., Wiesman, E., Diaz-Garcia, L., & Zalapa, J. (2020). The Genetic Diversity of Cranberry Crop Wild Relatives, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton and V. oxycoccos L., in the US, with Special Emphasis on National Forests. Plants, 9(11), 1446. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111446

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop