Next Article in Journal
The Selection of Gamma-Ray Irradiated Higher Yield Rice Mutants by Directed Evolution Method
Previous Article in Journal
Trifolium repens-Associated Bacteria as a Potential Tool to Facilitate Phytostabilization of Zinc and Lead Polluted Waste Heaps
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/plants9081003
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interactive Effects of N Form and P Concentration on Growth and Tissue Composition of Hybrid Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum)

by
Chonthicha Pakwan
1,
Arunothai Jampeetong
1,2,* and
Hans Brix
3
1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Mueang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Research Center in Bioresources for Agriculture, Industry and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Department of Biology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(8), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081003
Submission received: 15 July 2020 / Revised: 3 August 2020 / Accepted: 5 August 2020 / Published: 7 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Plant–Soil Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to assess effect of nitrogen (N) form and phosphorus (P) level on the growth and mineral composition of hybrid Napier grass. Experimental plants were grown with different N forms (NO3−, NH4NO3, and NH4+; 500 µM) and P concentrations (100 and 500 µM) under greenhouse conditions for 42 days. Growth rate, morphology, pigments, and mineral nutrients in the plant tissue were analysed. At the low P concentration, the better growth was found in the plants supplied with NH4+ (relative growth rate (RGR) = 0.05 g·g−1·d−1), but at the high P concentration, the NH4+-fed plants had 37% lower growth rates and shorter roots and stems. At the high P level, the NH4NO3−-fed plants had the highest RGR (0.04 g·g−1·d−1). The mineral nutrient concentrations in the plant tissues were only slightly affected by N form and P concentration, although the P concentrations in the plant tissue of the NO3−-fed plants supplied with the high P concentration was 26% higher compared to the low P concentration plants. The N concentrations in the plant tissues did not vary between treatments. The results showed that the optimum N form for the plant growth and biomass productivity of hybrid Napier grass depends on P level. Hybrid Napier grass may be irrigated by treated wastewater containing high concentrations of N and P, but future studies are needed to evaluate biomass production and composition when irrigating with real wastewater from animal farms.

1. Introduction

The discharge of poorly treated wastewater from animal farms has increased with economic growth, particularly in developing countries where wastewater management is poor [1]. Nutrients and organic matter are common contaminants that get discharged into ground and water bodies, thus risking aquatic ecosystems and human health. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are generally found in high concentrations in dairy and swine wastewater. Ammonium (NH4+) is the major form of inorganic N usually found at high concentrations in raw wastewater, but NH4 can easily transform into nitrate (NO3−) via nitrification processes [2]. Additionally, the concentration of P is usually high in wastewater from animal farms. Anaerobic digestion and constructed wetlands (CWs) are conventional methods to reduce the pollutants [3,4,5,6]. However, effluent from the anaerobic digestion still contains high concentrations of N and P that can cause water eutrophication [7,8].
At present, sustainable water use in agriculture has attracted great interest. The reuse of water and nutrients from wastewater through the irrigation of crops by treated wastewater has been identified as a way to mitigate water shortage and, at the same time, recover nutrients as fertilizers. Irrigation with wastewater can improve soil properties, increase plant productivity, reduce the costs of commercial fertilizers and water supplies, and minimize the discharge of nutrients to freshwater ecosystems [9,10,11]. Recycling N and P from wastewater has been applied to many grasses and crops. A study by Leal et al. [12] found that secondary-treated wastewater provided extra elements including N, P, Ca, Mg, and K that could increase the yield of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) compared with a control. Likewise, using secondary-treated abattoir wastewater irrigated crops was found to significantly increase the dry mass yield and nutrient contents of Pennisetum purpureum Schumach, Medicago sativa L., Sinapis alba L., and Helianthus annuus L., as well as to increase soil fertility, particularly with N and P [11].
Recently, bioenergy grasses such as switch grass, Miscanthus, and Napier grass have been used for removing nutrients from wastewater [13,14,15]. In Thailand, a new hybrid Napier (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach × Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke cv. Pakchong 1) developed by Dr. Krailas Kiyothong, Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, Thailand, has been introduced to the farmers as a fodder crop. Because of its fast growth, disease and drought tolerance, easy propagation, and high yield production, this plant seems to be appropriate as an alternative raw material for biofuel production [16]. Additionally, the Ministry of Energy, Thailand, has paid attention to alternative biofuel sources to replace the use of fossil fuel in electricity generation, and plants with high biomass yield have become targets [17]. As a result, farmers and relevant agencies have encouraged the plantation of this grass. To obtain sufficient material for bioenergy production, the application of fertilizers and water are crucial factors to allow for the high yield of biomass. Recently, a study by Somjai and Suwan [18] found that hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 in an area receiving sufficient water had a higher biomass yield than plants in a non-irrigated area. However, knowledge on fertilizer application, as well as the most efficient way to supply water to the crop field was suggested for further study.
As mentioned above, treated wastewater is a good source of N and P and can be used as an alternative nutrient supply for crop growth on poor soil. However, when reusing wastewater for irrigation, the form of N, as either NH4+ or NO3− or mixed NH4NO3, and the P concentration may affect plant growth and nutrient acquisition. A previous study found that the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 grew well when NH4+ was provided as the major N source [19] and that the plant can tolerate NH4+ in concentrations up to 5 mM [20]. However, the P concentration used in these studies was rather low (100 µM) compared to the P concentrations in real wastewater. It is therefore not known if the high P levels normally found in real wastewater affect the N acquisition of this species in response to the various N forms interacting with P availability. It has been documented that interactions between N and P availability can promote plant nutrition and increase primary productivity [21,22]. However, plant responses to N and P might be different depending upon concentration levels. Additionally, the differences could be caused by the differences in the uptake mechanism of the two N forms. NO3− uptake is an energetically costly mechanism. NO3− is taken up into the root cytosol by co-transportation with H+ via nitrate transporters (NRTs), while NH4+ uptake is accompanied by H+ extrusion from the root cells. Thus, NO3− uptake induces an increase in pH in the rhizosphere, whereas NH4+ uptake induces a decrease in pH [23]. The changes in pH as a result of N uptake can affect the mobilization of P in the soil and, hence, the P uptake in the plants. Difference ionic charges of NH4+ and NO3− lead to different antagonist or protagonist relationships with P and other ions in the rooting media [24]. It has also been suggested that N–P interactions depend on the supplied N form [25]. To increase our knowledge on this topic, this study aimed to assess the interactive effects of N form and P concentration on growth, morphology, pigments, and mineral composition in the plant tissue of hybrid Napier Pakchong 1. The results from the study will be useful for the development of wastewater management strategies to recycle water and nutrients for agricultural proposes.

2. Results

2.1. Growth and Morphology

The growth of the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 was affected by both the N form and P concentration in the growth medium, and significant interactions between the two factors were observed (Table 1). The effects of N form on growth depended on the P concentration in the growth medium, as the lowest relative growth rate (RGR) was found in the plants grown with NH4+ at a high P concentration, whereas at the low P concentration, the plants grown with NH4+ had the highest RGR (Figure 1). The RGRs were not significantly different among NO3−-fed plants and NH4NO3-fed plants at both the low and high P concentrations. Similarly, the highest shoot elongation rate (SER) was found in NH4+-fed plants at low P concentrations, and the interaction between these two factors had a significant effect on SERs (Figure 1).
In regard to the plant morphology, the N form and P concentration affected both roots and leaves. As indicated by the significant interactions in the ANOVA (Table 1), the effects of P concentration on the number of roots and root length depended on the N form, as the lowest root number and root length were found in the NH4+-fed, high P concentration plants, while the plants supplied with NO3− at the high P concentration had the highest root number (Figure 2a,b). The leaf areas and number of leaves were highest for the NH4NO3-fed plants and independent of the P level (Figure 2c,d).

2.2. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids

The concentrations of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), and carotenoids were affected by N form and P concentration, and significant interaction between these factors were observed (Table 1). In general, the low P concentration plants had higher contents of chlorophylls and carotenoids than the high P concentration plants. The highest Chl a and Chl b were found in the NH4+-fed, low P concentration plants (Figure 3).

2.3. Mineral Element Concentrations in the Plant Tissue

N source and P concentration affected the mineral element composition in the plant tissue, and significant interactions between N source and P concentration were observed—particularly in the leaves (Table 2). The concentrations of Ca and Mg in the plant stems were significantly affected by the N form, whereas the P concentration affected the levels of K, Mg, and P in the stems. The NO3−-fed plants had higher concentrations of Ca and Mg overall, regardless of P concentration. However, K concentration was higher in the high P concentration plants than in the low P concentration plants (Figure 4). In the plant leaves, the concentration of Ca was not affected by the N form and P concentration, but the K concentration increased in NO3− fed plants, particularly at the high P supply. P concentration also increased in the plants supplied with the high P concentration (Figure 5). In the roots, Ca was affected by the N form, but K and Mg were affected by the P concentration (Table 2). The highest concentration of Ca was found in the NO3—fed, high P concentration plants. The concentration of Mg was low in the plants supplied with the high P concentration, while the concentration of K was low in the plants supplied with the low P concentration. Similar to the leaves, P concentration tended to increase in the high P concentration treatments, particularly in NO3−-fed plants (Figure 6).

2.4. CN in the Plant Tissue

The total C content in the plant tissue was not affected by the N form and P concentration. Generally, the total C in roots was higher than in leaves and stems (Figure 4e, Figure 5e, Figure 6e). The total N in the stems was affected by the N form and P concentration (Table 2). The total N slightly increased with the increasing P concentration, while there was no effect on the leaf total N. In roots, the total N significantly decreased in the NH4+-fed plants exposed to the high P concentration (Figure 4f, Figure 5f, Figure 6f).

3. Discussion

N forms and P concentration affected the growth of the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1, and the plants responded to the N form differently depending on P levels. At the low P concentration, the plants grew best when grown on NH4+, whereas at the high P concentration, the plants performed best with the NH4NO3 treatment. Previous studies have reported that NH4+ is the preferred inorganic N form for hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 [19]. However, the current study showed that the N preference depended on the P availability. Other studies have reported interactions between N and P availability on plant growth. Ulrich and Burton [26] found that NO3−-N and P supply had a strong effect on the growth of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Sparganium eurycarpum Engelm., Typha latifolia L., and Typha angustifolia L., whereas no effect of K was found. The growth of all species fed with high NO3− levels were stimulated by increased P additions. Similarly, the growth of Canna indica L. increased under the high N and P treatments (6.4 mM as NH4NO3 and 0.48 mM as KH2PO4), and interactions between N and P availability were observed. However, the plants supplied with the low N supply (0.36 mM as NH4NO3) had a low tissue N concentration as a reflection of the N limitation when they were exposed to high P levels [27]. In this study, NH4+ nutrition interacted with the P level, and synergistic effects on plant growth and N use efficiency were observed. Providing NH4+ to the rooting medium has been reported to promote P uptake as a result of ammonium-induced acidification in the rhizosphere [25,28,29,30]. However, N uptake can be stimulated at high P concentrations [31]. Likewise, the present study showed that NH4+ uptake was improved at the high P concentration (data not shown), resulting in an increasing root tissue N concentration. This result was in accordance with the results presented by Romero et al. [32], who found that the NH4+ uptake rate of P. australis increased in the high P concentration (50 µM) treatment. The ability of P. australis to adjust the NH4+ uptake kinetic in response to high NH4+ and P supply helps the plant to increase its capacity to exploit the excess nutrients and be able to compete with other wetland species. In contrast, in the presence of NO3−, it is likely that growth and P accumulation in the tissue positively correlates with NO3−-N when the P supply is high [26]. The hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 fed exclusively with NO3−-N had a slightly higher RGR at the high P concentration, while the RGR significantly increased in the NH4NO3 treatment. Moreover, the P concentrations in the tissue, particularly in the roots and leaves, tended to be high in the plants supplied with either NO3− or NH4NO3 at the low P concentration, but significantly higher root P concentrations were found in plants supplied with NO3− at the high P level. This might have been related to the fact that ATP is required for active NO3− transport across the plasma membrane into root cells. Reduced ATP levels have been reported to directly affect NO3− uptake [33,34], confirming the study of Rufty Jr. et al. [35], who found that NO3− assimilation and uptake were restricted under P deficiency conditions.
Root morphological adaptations depending on P availability have already been documented [28,36,37]. Root length and root surface area play important roles in excavation and P utilization. P deficiency has been shown to result in increased root length and higher root density [36,38]. In contrast, plants growing at high P concentrations experience a reduction in root length, which is assumed to be a result of P toxicity [37,39]. In this study, the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 had shorter roots when the plants were grown at the high P concentration. Likewise, the average leaf area and pigment concentrations (chlorophylls and carotenoids) significantly decreased in the plants supplied with the high P concentration, and the strongest effects were found in the NH4+-fed plants. Leaf chlorosis is a recognized symptom of P toxicity. Many plants such as rice, soy bean, wheat, and Arabidopsis show leaf chlorosis when grown under excessive P applications [40,41,42]. Moreover, a study on wild-type rice species (Oryza sativa L. “Notohikari”) grown in a hydroponic solution with different P supplies showed a decrease in chlorophylls after being exposed to high P concentration, and the Rubisco activation in the high P-fed plants was also disturbed. As a consequence, the photosynthesis of the plants was inhibited. Similar results found in the study of Shane et al. [43] showed that the photosynthetic rates of Hakea prostrata R.Br. significantly decreased after growth at high P supply rates (150 and 300 µmol P d−1). In the present study, we found that the NH4+-fed plants had reduced contents of Chl a and Chl b (by 48% and 61%, respectively), whereas the leaf P concentrations significantly increased by 45%. This suggested that leaf chlorosis was caused by oxidative stress and photosynthetic disruption. Under a high P accumulation, the Rubisco activity was reduced and caused lower electron sink capacities, thus leading to high electron accumulated in the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Subsequently, the concentrations of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increased. As a result, it can be said that high ROS accumulation triggers leaf chlorosis [42].
Recycling high nutrient-containing wastewater to crops is an attractive prospect for water management, especially in arid agricultural areas. Due to the rapid growth rate of hybrid Napier grass, its ability to utilize various N forms, and its high tissue protein content, the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 has been recommended for wastewater treatments [19]. Results from this study revealed that high P concentrations may negatively affect plant growth, root length, average leaf area, and chlorophyll contents, particularly when plants are supplied with NH4+. Mineral and nutrient contents in the plant tissue were, however, only slightly influenced. A study by Ali et al. [31] found that P application can enhance N uptake in maize (Zea may L.), but N uptake was limited at high P concentrations. We also found that the high P supply caused a lowering of the root N concentrations, especially in the NH4+-fed plants. Moreover, Li et al. [44] revealed that P fertilization can affect the biomass productivity and photosynthetic N use efficiency (PNUE) of two Larix species. Different responses to the N and P of these plants resulted from the different physiological traits of the species and the different amounts of nutrients in the soil. The present study found that N supply in the form of NH4NO3 can alleviate the Napier grass from losing biomass, especially at a high P availability. Hence, reusing a high P concentration wastewater to grow crops could be an additional option to prevent the effect of excess ammonium.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Preparation and Experimental Design

The hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach × P. americanum (L.) Leeke cv. Pakchong 1) used in the experiment was prepared from plant stocks obtained from the Faculty of Fisheries Technology and Aquatic Resources, Maejo University, Thailand. Plant stocks with at least two nodes were selected and placed in trays filled with tap water. After new shoots were produced from the nodes, all plant stocks were supplied with a standard N and P free growth medium prepared according to Smart and Barko [45]. The growth medium had the following composition (mM): K 0.16; Ca 0.62; Mg 0.28; Na 0.69; SO4 0.84; Cl 1.25, B 0.23; Cu 0.02, Fe 0.28; Mn 0.11, Mo 0.006; and Zn 0.04. The pH of the growth medium was adjusted to 6.5. All new plants were propagated under greenhouse conditions at the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Approximately 14 days after new shoot were produced, plants of uniform size were selected and separated from the mother stems for use in the experiment. The experimental set-up was a 3 × 2 factorial design with three N forms (NO3−, NH4NO3, and NH4+) at equimolar concentrations (500 µmol N L−1) and two levels of P (100 and 500 µM) prepared from KH2PO4, with 5 replications for each treatment combination. Each experimental treatment combination was established in a hydroponic culture in 40 L containers placed in a greenhouse with a light regime of approximately 12 h light/12 h dark. The temperatures were 30–37 °C day/24–28 °C night. The growth medium in the containers was changed every three days and continuously aerated using air pumps to maintain efficient mixing. At the beginning of the experiment, 10 plants similar to the experimental plants were selected and weighed. The plants were dried in an oven at 55 °C to a constant weight, and the fresh mass to dry mass ratio was calculated and used for growth calculation.

4.2. Plant Harvest and Chemical Analyses

All experimental plants were harvested after 42 days of treatment. Total shoot length, average leaf area, number of leaves and roots, and root length were measured. Then, all plants were fragmented into roots, stems, and leaves and freeze-dried. Plant growth was calculated as the RGR and SER. The RGR, based on total plant dry mass, was calculated following the formula: RGR (g g−1 d−1) = (ln final dry mass − ln initial dry mass)/days [46]. The shoot elongation rate (mm d−1) was calculated from the formula: SER = (final shoot length − initial shoot length)/days. The freeze-dried plant materials were used for plant biochemical analysis.
Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophylls (Chl a and b), and total carotenoids in freeze-dried leaves (n = 5) were determined according to Lichtenthaler [47]. Approximately 8 mg of ground leaves were extracted with 96% ethanol (8 mL). Then, the absorbance of the extracts was measured using a spectrophotometric method at wavelengths of 470, 648.6, and 664.2 nm.
The concentrations of Ca, K, P, Mg, Mn, Fe, and Na in each plant part (n = 5) were analysed in finely-ground dry plant samples (approximately 250 mg). The element concentrations were analysed using inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry (Optima 2000 DV, PerkinElmer Instruments Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) after microwave digestion in HNO3 and H2O2. The total C and total N contents in the plant tissue (n = 5) were determined from approximately 2 mg of dry plant samples with a CHN analyser (Na2000, Carlo Erba, Italy).

4.3. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using Statgraphics Plus version 4.1 (Manugistics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The interactions between the N and P factors were analysed by a two-way ANOVA. Assumptions of normality were tested by Levene’s test. Post hoc HSD tests at a 5% significance level were applied to identify differences among treatments.

5. Conclusions

The results of the study showed that N form and P level interactively affect the growth, morphology, and mineral concentrations in the tissue of the hybrid Napier Pakchong 1. The responses to N form were found to depend on P level. At the low P concentration, the plants performed best when fed with NH4+, but at the high P concentration, the plants had a reduced RGR, root number, root length, and chlorophylls and carotenoids contents when only fed with NH4. The irrigation of hybrid Napier Pakchong 1 by treated wastewater may be an attractive technique to increase crop yield for fodder or bioenergy. However, future studies are needed to evaluate biomass production and composition when irrigating with real wastewater from animal farms.

Author Contributions

C.P.: formal analysis and investigation; A.J.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, supervision, and writing—original draft; H.B.: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST), Thailand. The research work was also partially supported by Chiang Mai University, Thailand. C.P. and A.J. thank Hans Brix for his support for the minerals and CN analysis. Additionally, thanks to Niwooti Whangchai at Faculty of Fisheries Technology and Aquatic Resources, Maejo University for his generosity in giving us the plant stocks. A.J. wishes to thank Andes Charee Rosson for improving the English text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bruinsma, J. (Ed.) World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030—An FAO Perspective; Earthscan: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vymazal, J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 380, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kadlec, R.H.; Wallace, S.D. (Eds.) Treatment Wetlands, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vymazal, J. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Water 2010, 2, 530–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Shen, Y.; Linville, J.L.; Urgun-Demirtas, M.; Mintz, M.M.; Snyder, S.W. An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: Challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 50, 346–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Abdeshahian, P.; Lim, J.S.; Ho, W.S.; Hashim, H.; Lee, C.T. Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2016, 60, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kirchmann, H.; Witter, E. Composition of fresh, aerobic and anaerobic farm animal dungs. Bioresour. Technol. 1992, 40, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weiland, P. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sato, T.; Qadir, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Endo, T.; Zahoor, A. Global regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generator, treatment, and use. Agric. Water Manag. 2013, 130, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Fu, C.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Li, X.H.; Jing, Q.C.; Wei, X.F.; Shi, T.H.; Dong, Y.L.; Yan, P.P. Effect of poultry wastewater irrigation on nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon contents in farmland soil. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 968–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matheyarasu, R.; Bolan, N.; Naidu, R. Abattoir wastewater irrigation increases the availability of nutrients and influences on plant growth and development. Water Air Pollut. 2016, 227, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Leal, R.M.P.; Firme, L.P.; Montes, C.R.; Melfi, A.J.; de Stefano Piedade, S.M. Soil exchangeable cations, sugarcane production and nutrient uptake after wastewater irrigation. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba Braz.) 2009, 66, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mo, W.; Zhang, Q. Energy-nutrients-water nexus: Integrated resource recovery in municipal wastewater treatment plants. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 127, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dzantor, E.K.; Chekol, T.; Vough, L.R. Feasibility of using forage grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of organic pollutants. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2000, 35, 1645–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Somerville, C.; Youngs, H.; Taylor, C.; Davis, S.C.; Long, S.P. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 2010, 329, 790–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Somsiri, S.; Vivanpatarakij, S. Potential of transforming Napier grass to energy. J. Energy Res. 2015, 12, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  17. Waramit, N.; Chaugool, J. Napier grass: A novel energy crop development and the current status in Thailand. J. ISSAAS. 2014, 20, 139–150. [Google Scholar]
  18. Somjai, T.; Suwan, C. Carbon footprint analysis of Napier Pakchong 1 grass plantation in Prachinburi province. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2020; Volume 141, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jampeetong, A.; Brix, H.; Kantawanichkul, S. Effects of inorganic nitrogen form on growth, morphology, N uptake, and nutrient allocation in hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum x P. americanum cv. Pakchong1). Ecol. Eng. 2014, 73, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tarvorasak, V.; Piwpuan, N.; Jampeetong, A. Responses and tolerance to high ammonium levels of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum cv. Pakchong 1): Assessing the potential for water treatment and agricultural management in southeast Asia. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2016, 43, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeng, H.; Liu, G.; Kinoshita, T.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Xu, G. Stimulation of phosphorus uptake by ammonium nutrition involves plasma membrane H+ ATPase in rice roots. Plant Soil. 2012, 357, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schleuss, P.M.; Widdig, M.; Heintz-Buschart, A.; Kirkman, K.; Spohn, M. Interactions of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling promote P acquisition and explain synergistic plant-growth responses. Ecology 2020, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between nitrate and ammonium in their uptake, allocation, assimilation, and signaling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dickson, R.W.; Fisher, P.R.; Argo, W.R.; Jacques, D.J.; Sartain, J.B.; Trenholm, L.E.; Yeager, T.H. Solution ammonium: Nitrate ratio and cation/anion uptake affect acidity or basicity with floriculture species in hydroponics. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 200, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mpanga, I.K.; Nkebiwe, P.M.; Kuhlmann, M.; Cozzolino, V.; Piccolo, A.; Geistlinger, J.; Berger, N.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. The form of N supply determines plant growth promotion by P-solubilizing microorganisms in maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ulrich, K.E.; Burton, T.M. An experimental comparison of the dry-matter and nutrient distribution patterns of Typha latifolia L., Typha angustifolia L., Sparganium eurycarpum Engelm. and Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Aquat. Bot. 1988, 2, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Rengel, Z.; Meney, K. Interactive effects of N and P on growth but not on resource allocation of Canna indica in wetland microcosms. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jing, J.; Rui, Y.; Zhang, F.; Rengel, Z.; Shen, J. Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification. Field Crop Res. 2010, 119, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, C.Q.; Zhu, X.F.; Hu, A.Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, B.; Dong, X.Y.; Shen, R.F. Differential effects of nitrogen forms on cell wall phosphorus remobilization are mediated by nitric oxide, pectin content, and phosphate transporter expression. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1407–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ludewig, U.; Yuan, L.; Neumann, G. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of global phosphorus use: Focus on root and rhizosphere levels in the agronomic system. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2019, 6, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ali, J.; Bakht, J.; Shafi, M.; Khan, S.; Shah, W.A. Uptake nitrogen as affected by various contaminations of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2002, 1, 367–369. [Google Scholar]
  32. Romero, J.A.; Brix, H.; Comin, F.A. Interactive effects of N and P on growth, nutrient allocation and NH4+ uptake kinetics by Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 1999, 64, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gniazdowska, A.; Rychter, A.M. Nitrate uptake by bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) roots under phosphate deficiency. Plant Soil. 2000, 226, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Han, Y.; Liu, Q.; Gu, J.; Gong, J.; Guan, C.; Lepo, J.E.; Rong, X.; Song, H.; Zhang, Z. V-ATPase and V-PPase at the tonoplast affect NO3- content in Brassica napus by controlling distribution of NO3- between the cytoplasm and vacuole. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 34, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rufty, T.W., Jr.; MacKown, C.T.; Israel, D.W. Phosphorus stress effects on assimilation on nitrate. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shen, J.B.; Yuan, L.X.; Zhang, J.L.; Li, H.G.; Bai, Z.H.; Chen, X.P.; Zhang, W.F.; Zhang, F.S. Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ye, D.; Li, T.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, G.; Yu, H. Root physiological adaptations involved in enhancing P assimilation in mining and non-mining ecotypes of Polygonum hydropiper grown under organic P media. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. López-Bucio, J.; Cruz-Ramı´rez, A.; Herrera-Estrella, L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yano, K.; Kume, T. Root Morphological plasticity for heterogeneous phosphorus supply in Zea mays L. Plant Prod. Sci. 2005, 8, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bhatti, A.S.; Loneragan, J.F. The effect of early superphosphate toxicity on the subsequent growth of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1970, 21, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chiou, T.J.; Aung, K.; Lin, S.I.; Wu, C.C.; Chiang, S.F.; Su, C.L. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Takagi, D.; Miyagi, A.; Tazoe, Y.; Suganami, M.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Ueda, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Noguchi, K.; Hirotsu, N.; Makino, A. Phosphorus toxicity disrupts Rubisco activation and reactive oxygen species defence systems by phytic acid accumulation in leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shane, M.W.; McCully, M.E.; Lambers, H. Tissue and cellular phosphorus storage during development of phosphorus toxicity in Hakea prostrata (Proteaceae). J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1033–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Li, J.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, J.; Korpelainen, H.; Li, C. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth and physiological traits of two Larix species. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 130, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Smart, R.M.; Barko, J.W. Laboratory culture of submerged freshwater macrophytes on natural sediments. Aquat. Bot. 1985, 21, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hunt, R. Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis; Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
Plants 09 01003 g001 550
Figure 1. Relative growth rate (RGR) (a) and shoot elongation rate (SER) (b) of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 1. Relative growth rate (RGR) (a) and shoot elongation rate (SER) (b) of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g001
Plants 09 01003 g002 550
Figure 2. Root number (a), root length (b), leaf number (c), and average leaf area (d) of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 2. Root number (a), root length (b), leaf number (c), and average leaf area (d) of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g002
Plants 09 01003 g003 550
Figure 3. Chlorophyll a, Chl a (a); chlorophyll b, Chl b (b); Chl a/Chl b ratio (c); and total carotenoids (d) in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 3. Chlorophyll a, Chl a (a); chlorophyll b, Chl b (b); Chl a/Chl b ratio (c); and total carotenoids (d) in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g003
Plants 09 01003 g004 550
Figure 4. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in stems of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 4. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in stems of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g004
Plants 09 01003 g005 550
Figure 5. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 5. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g005
Plants 09 01003 g006 550
Figure 6. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in roots of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Figure 6. Concentrations of Ca (a), K (b), Mg (c), P (d), total C (e), and total N (f) in roots of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) (mean ± SD) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, and NH4NO3) and P concentrations (LP, low P concentration (100 µM P); HP, high P concentration (500 µM P)). Different letters above columns indicate significant differences between treatments.
Plants 09 01003 g006
Table
Table 1. Results of two-way ANOVA (F-ratios) of growth, morphological characteristics, chlorophylls and carotenoids concentrations in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum) grown on different nitrogen (N) forms (NH4+, NO3−, or NH4NO3) and phosphorus (P) concentrations (100 and 500 µM).
Table 1. Results of two-way ANOVA (F-ratios) of growth, morphological characteristics, chlorophylls and carotenoids concentrations in leaves of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum) grown on different nitrogen (N) forms (NH4+, NO3−, or NH4NO3) and phosphorus (P) concentrations (100 and 500 µM).
Main EffectsInteraction
N FormP ConcentrationN Form × P Concentration
Relative growth rate (g·g−1·d−1)1.72.76.8 **
Shoot elongation rate (mm·d−1)0.35.5 *7.8 **
Root number0.50.015.0 *
Root length (cm)0.417.5 ***4.0 *
Leaf number3.6 *0.10.4
Average leaf area (cm2)4.6 *0.72.91
Chlorophyll a (mg·g−1·DW)6.4 **19.4 ***5.9 **
Chlorophyll b (mg·g−1·DW)6.2 **12.7 ***13.8 ***
Total chlorophylls (mg·g−1·DW)7.3 **23.9 ***9.1 **
Total carotenoids (mg·g−1·DW)6.1 **21.5 ***6.9 **
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 2. Results of two-way ANOVA (F-ratios) of nutrient minerals in the tissue of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, or NH4NO3) and P concentrations (100 and 500 µM).
Table 2. Results of two-way ANOVA (F-ratios) of nutrient minerals in the tissue of hybrid Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum × P. americanum) grown on different N forms (NH4+, NO3−, or NH4NO3) and P concentrations (100 and 500 µM).
Main EffectsInteraction
N FormP ConcentrationN Form × P Concentration
Stems
Ca (mg·g−1 DW)4.6 *1.10.8
K (mg·g−1 DW)1.512.6 **2.1
Mg (mg·g−1 DW)12.9 **11.0 **3.1
P (mg·g−1 DW)0.116.0 ***4.0 *
Total C (%)2.33.00.4
Total N (%)6.9 **5.1 *1.6
Leaves
Ca (mg·g−1 DW)2.13.82.4
K (mg·g−1 DW)11.4 ***1.85.9 **
Mg (mg g−1 DW)4.3 *2.46.5 **
P (mg·g−1 DW)6.7 **50.5 ***12.7 ***
Total C (%)1.80.50.7
Total N (%)1.31.01.1
Roots
Ca (mg·g−1 DW)13.8 ***0.60.4
K (mg·g−1 DW)0.44.9 *1.1
Mg (mg·g−1 DW)0.916.9 ***0.6
P (mg·g−1 DW)5.2 *20.0 ***3.9 *
Total C (%)3.37.6 *1.1
Total N (%)1.70.43.6 *
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pakwan, C.; Jampeetong, A.; Brix, H. Interactive Effects of N Form and P Concentration on Growth and Tissue Composition of Hybrid Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum). Plants 2020, 9, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081003

AMA Style

Pakwan C, Jampeetong A, Brix H. Interactive Effects of N Form and P Concentration on Growth and Tissue Composition of Hybrid Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum). Plants. 2020; 9(8):1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pakwan, Chonthicha, Arunothai Jampeetong, and Hans Brix. 2020. "Interactive Effects of N Form and P Concentration on Growth and Tissue Composition of Hybrid Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum americanum)" Plants 9, no. 8: 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop