Next Article in Journal
Effects of Increased N Deposition on Leaf Functional Traits of Four Contrasting Tree Species in Northeast China
Next Article in Special Issue
OsmiR535, a Potential Genetic Editing Target for Drought and Salinity Stress Tolerance in Oryza sativa
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Constituents of the Leaves of Campanula takesimana (Korean Bellflower) and Their Inhibitory Effects on LPS-induced PGE2 Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Drought and Salinity on Two Commercial Varieties of Lavandula angustifolia Mill
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/plants9091233
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Molecular and Functional Characterization of the Durum Wheat Lipoxygenase TdLOX2 Suggests Its Role in Hyperosmotic Stress Response

by
Valeria Menga
and
Daniela Trono
*
Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria, Centro di Ricerca Cerealicoltura e Colture Industriali, S.S. 673, Km 25,200, 71122 Foggia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(9), 1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091233
Submission received: 1 September 2020 / Revised: 16 September 2020 / Accepted: 17 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop and Medical Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In plants, lipoxygenases (LOXs) are involved in various processes, such as growth, development, and response to stress cues. In the present study, the expression pattern of six durum wheat LOX-encoding genes (TdLpx-B1.1, TdLpx-B1.2, TdLpx-A2, TdLpx-B2, TdLpx-A3 and TdLpx-B3) under hyperosmotic stress was investigated. With osmotic (0.42 M mannitol) and salt (0.21 M NaCl) stress imposed at the early stages of seedling growth, a strong induction of the TdLpx-A2 gene expression in the shoots paralleled an equally strong increase in the LOX activity. Enhanced levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and increased rates of superoxide anion generation were also observed as a result of the stress imposition. Sequence analysis of the TdLOX2 encoded by the TdLpx-A2 gene revealed that it belonged to the type-1 9-LOX group. When overexpressed in E. coli, TdLOX2 exhibited normal enzyme activity, high sensitivity to specific LOX inhibitors, with 76% and 99% inhibition by salicylhydroxamic and propyl gallate, respectively, and a preference for linoleic acid as substrate, which was converted exclusively to its corresponding 13-hydroperoxide. This unexpected positional specificity could be related to the unusual TV/K motif that in TdLOX2 replaces the canonical TV/R motif of 9-LOXs. Treatment of seedlings with propyl gallate strongly suppressed the increase in LOX activity induced by the hyperosmotic stress; the MDA accumulation was also reduced but less markedly, whereas the rate of superoxide anion generation was even more increased. Overall, our findings suggest that the up-regulation of the TdLpx-A2 gene is a component of the durum wheat response to hyperosmotic stress and that TdLOX2 may act by counteracting the excessive generation of harmful reactive oxygen species responsible for the oxidative damages that occur in plants under stress.

1. Introduction

As sessile organisms, plants face various unfavourable environmental conditions. Salinity of soil is one of the most serious problems that limit agriculture in arid and semiarid areas [1]. Salt stress induces osmotic stress and ion toxicity inside the plant cells, which alter plant physiological and metabolic processes. These primary effects can in turn have secondary consequences, such as the accumulation of excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS regulate different physiological processes in plants; however, their overproduction may cause a variety of harmful effects on plant cell metabolism, thereby restricting plant growth and development, and reducing yield [2,3,4]. Therefore, plants have evolved different mechanisms to minimize the accumulation of ROS in the cells [5].
Lipoxygenase (LOX) (linoleate:oxygen oxidoreductase; EC 1.13.11.12) is a non-heme iron-containing dioxygenase that catalyze the incorporation of molecular oxygen into polyunsaturated fatty acids that contain one or more 1,4-cis,cis pentadiene moieties [6]. Depending on the carbon chain position at which oxygen is added, plant LOXs are distinguished into 9-LOXs and 13-LOXs, whose primary product is the 9- and 13-hydroperoxy fatty acid, respectively; LOX enzymes also exist that can produce both 9- and 13-hydroperoxides [7]. Moreover, on the basis of their primary structure and sequence similarity, these enzymes are also distinguished as type 1 and type 2 LOXs. The type 1 LOXs, which include both 9- and 13-LOXs, are highly similar to each other (>75%) and do not possess a transit peptide; conversely, the type 2 LOXs consist exclusively of 13-LOXs, are moderately similar to each other (35%) and present the N-terminal transit peptide for chloroplast targeting [7].
In plants, LOX enzymes are encoded by multi-gene families and the hydroperoxy fatty acids produced by LOXs are rapidly converted into diverse oxylipins [8], which have been shown to have roles in several biological events of plants. Accumulating evidence indicates that LOXs play a role in plant growth [9,10,11,12], arbuscular mycorrhiza formation [13], wounding [14,15] and defence to pathogens [16,17]. Moreover, numerous studies have found that LOXs are involved in plant response to abiotic stresses and, in particular, to hyperosmotic stresses. For example, an up-regulation of the PgLOX3 gene was observed in the adventitious roots of ginseng plants exposed to water deficit [18], whereas pepper CaLOX1 was found to be induced in leaves of plants grown under salt and drought stress [19]; Arabidopsis plants that overexpressed the CaLOX1 gene were found to be more tolerant to ABA, mannitol and salt stress compared to wild-type plants [19]. An enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress, high salinity and drought was also observed in Arabidopsis plants that overexpressed the DkLOX3 from persimmon [20]. Sixty four putative GhLOX genes were identified in four cotton species and some of these genes were found to be up-regulated in response to salt stress; the silencing of the GhLOX12 and GhLOX13 genes induced and increased susceptibility of cotton plants to salinity [21]. In the oriental melon, the promoter of CmLOX08 gene was cloned, and cis-regulatory elements were identified that responded to different abiotic stresses including salt and drought [22].
Evidence also exists that salinity may induce significant increases in LOX activity. Exposure of soybean seedlings to mannitol stress was found to induce an increase of about 60% in the enzymatic activity and the protein levels of both LOX1 and LOX2 [23]. Significant increases in LOX activity were observed in leaves and roots of olive trees [24], as well as in tomato calli [25] exposed to progressively increasing water stress conditions. An increase in LOX activity was also detected in rice seedlings [26] and tomato plants [27,28] exposed to salinity.
Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) is a typical crop widely grown in the Mediterranean region, where salt stress is caused by both the groundwater salinization in aquifers and the use of brackish water for irrigation [29]. Being a winter crop, durum wheat faces the highest salinity levels at seedling stage, when the soil contains high salt concentrations due to the low rainfalls and the high evaporation in the previous summer that induces the migration of salts to the soil surface [30]. Generally, durum wheat is considered to be moderately tolerant to salinity, but its productivity and quality can be significantly compromised by salt stress [31]. For this reason, the understanding of the mechanisms underlying durum wheat seedling responses to salinity represents an important goal to be pursued.
Among cereals, LOX genes and isoforms have been deeply investigated in barley. This crop possesses three LOX genes, namely LoxA, LoxB and LoxC, [32,33]. The LoxA and LoxB genes map to the 4HS chromosome, whereas the LoxC gene maps to the 7HL chromosome [33]. Two isoforms, LOX-1 and LOX-2, encoded by the LoxA and LoxC genes, respectively, have been purified and characterized [34]; conversely, the LOX isoform encoded by the LoxB gene has not yet been isolated. In durum wheat, LOX-encoding (Lpx) genes corresponding to the barley Lox genes have been identified. Three Lpx-1 genes, namely Lpx-B1.1, Lpx-B1.2 and Lpx-B1.3, orthologous to the barley LoxA gene, have been mapped to the 4B chromosome [35,36], a Lpx-1_like pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 4A [37], two partial sequences designated Lpx-A3 and Lpx-B3 with high similarity with barley LoxB have been assigned to the group 4 chromosomes, and two partial sequences designed Lpx-A2 and Lpx-B2 and corresponding to the barley LoxC gene have been mapped to the group 5 chromosomes [35].
To date, the studies on the durum wheat Lpx genes (hereafter referred to as TdLpx genes) have been focused exclusively on their involvement in the oxidative degradation of carotenoids that occurs during pasta processing and that leads to the bleaching of dough and pasta products [35,36,38]. By contrast, no information is still available about the role that LOXs could play in the durum wheat response to environmental stresses. So, to shed some light into this aspect, in the present study an investigation was carried out on durum wheat seedlings to evaluate changes in the TdLpx genes expression and the LOX activity in response to mannitol and salt stress and in relation to ROS accumulation and membrane lipid peroxidation. To do this, the durum wheat cv. ‘Ofanto’ was chosen on the basis of its tolerance to salinity previously assessed by our research group. Among different genotypes exposed to different salinity levels, the cv. ‘Ofanto’ showed the highest retention of total biomass [39] and the maintenance of good grain yields [40]; these observations suggest the ability of this genotype to cope with salt stress by activating mechanisms at cellular level able to limit the detrimental effects of salinity on plant growth. The results reported in the present paper provide evidence for a role of the TdLpx-A2 gene in the durum wheat response to hyperosmotic stress and suggest that the TdLOX2 isoform might act by controlling the ROS accumulation that under stress is responsible for the increased levels of non-enzymatic peroxidation of membrane lipids.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Growth Performances of Seedlings Grown under Control, Mannitol and NaCl Stress Conditions

An experiment was carried out to evaluate the damages induced to seedling germination and growth by mannitol and NaCl stress (Figure 1). Under the control condition, the percentage of germination rapidly increased in the very first days after sowing (DAS), reaching 80% at the 2nd DAS and more than 98% at the end of the period examined (Figure 1a). Compared to the control condition, both osmotic and salt stress significantly delayed germination and reduced the germination percentage that was only 15% and 9%, respectively, at the 2nd DAS and reached 84% and 74%, respectively, at the end of the period examined (Figure 1a). Consistently, under the stress conditions, a significant increase was observed on the mean germination time from 2.22 days under the control condition to 3.61 days and 4.04 days under osmotic and salt stress, respectively (Figure 1b). In both cases the adverse effects were slightly greater in NaCl than in mannitol-treated seedlings. Mannitol and NaCl stress negatively affected also the seedling growth, although the effects of the two treatments did not differ significantly between each other (Figure 1c,d). Compared to the control condition, the shoot length was roughly halved under both stresses (Figure 1c). The effect of the stress imposition on the length of the primary root was less evident, with a one-third reduction observed over the period examined (Figure 1d).
These results agree with previous observations, which showed that osmotic stress and salinity in the immediate environment of germinating durum wheat seeds can delay or inhibit the germination process [41,42] and reduce the early seedling growth [43,44,45]. The use of a mannitol solution iso-osmotic to the NaCl solution allows to evaluate the relative contribution of the two components of the salt stress, namely the osmotic stress and the ion toxicity. So, the observation that no great differences exist between damages due to mannitol and NaCl treatment suggests that the adverse effects on germination and early seedling growth are mainly due to the osmotic effect rather than to the ion-toxic effect of NaCl. This result agrees with the two-phase response of wheat growth to salinity reported by Munns [3] according to which, in wheat plants, osmotic stress inhibits growth in the early days of salt stress treatment while the toxic stress, due to salt accumulation inside the cells, exhibits its effects later.

2.2. Malondialdehyde Accumulation and Superoxide Anion Generation Rate in the Shoots of Seedlings Grown under Control, Mannitol and NaCl Stress Conditions

It is widely ascertained that the osmotic stress and the ion-toxic effect induced by salinity in plant cells result in the oxidative stress, which can damage cellular components, including membrane lipids [46]. In this context, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA), which is a well-known lipid oxidation marker [47], and the rate of superoxide anion generation were measured in the shoots of seedlings grown under control conditions and exposed to osmotic and salt stress (Figure 2). Under the control condition, no significant variations in the MDA content were detected over the period examined, whereas a strong increase was observed under the hyperosmotic stresses (Figure 2a). At the end of the period examined, the MDA concentrations reached under mannitol and salt stress were 193% and 272% higher, respectively, than that in the control shoots (Figure 2a). Similarly, the rate of superoxide anion production under the control condition remained almost unchanged all over the period examined, whereas the hyperosmotic stresses caused a strong increase that became more evident as the time of exposure increased (Figure 2b). At the end of the period examined, the rate of superoxide anion production under mannitol and salt stress reached values 167% and 292% higher, respectively, than that in the control shoots (Figure 2b).
These results indicate that under normal growth conditions plants tend to maintain a balanced redox status. Hyperosmotic stresses may disturb this balance by inducing ROS accumulation and peroxidation of membrane lipids. These results are in line with previous studies that reported significant elevations of MDA and ROS in wheat genotypes exposed to drought or salinity [48]. Interestingly, both the MDA content and the superoxide anion production rate were inhibited more by NaCl than mannitol stress, which indicated that the redox status was negatively affected by both the osmotic and ion-toxic component of the salt stress.

2.3. Expression Levels of the TdLpx Genes in the Shoots of Seedlings Grown under Control, Mannitol and NaCl Stress Conditions

Evidence exists that LOXs are involved in the alteration of the redox status and in the modification of the membrane lipids in the cells of plants exposed to hyperosmotic stresses [23]. This prompted us to evaluate the expression profiles of the LOX-encoding genes, TdLpx-1, TdLpx-2 and TdLpx-3, in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings exposed to mannitol and NaCl stress (Figure 3).
Under the control condition, all the TdLpx-1 and TdLpx-2 genes were expressed at considerable levels, with the highest levels observed for the TdLpx-B1.2 gene; very low or even undetectable levels were instead observed for the TdLpx-3 genes (Figure 3). The transcript levels remained relatively constant all over the period examined for all the genes except the TdLpx-A2 gene, whose expression increased over time (Figure 3). A similar expression pattern has been reported for the orthologous genes in barley, a cereal grain species highly similar to wheat. In this species, the transcripts corresponding to the LoxA and LoxC genes, orthologous to the durum wheat TdLpx-1 and the TdLpx-2 genes, respectively, were found to be significantly present in the shoots from day 2 until day 5 after germination, whereas the transcripts corresponding to the LoxB gene, orthologous to the TdLpx-3 genes, were poorly detected [33,34].
Under both mannitol and NaCl stress, the expression levels of the TdLpx-1 and TdLpx-3 genes remained almost unchanged compared to the control condition, with the remarkable exception of a slight induction observed for the TdLpx-B1.1 gene between the 5th and the 6th DAS (Figure 3). As regards the TdLpx-2 genes, a slightly down-regulation was observed for the TdLpx-B2 gene under salinity, whereas the TdLpx-A2 was found to be strongly up-regulated under both mannitol and salt stress, with the transcript levels that increased with the time of exposure to the stress (Figure 3). Since the beginning of the treatment a stronger effect was observed under NaCl compared to mannitol stress.
The pattern revealed by the expression analysis clearly showed that, among all the TdLpx genes, the TdLpx-A2 gene is responsible for playing a specific role in the durum wheat response to hyperosmotic stresses. This is consistent with the increasing observations that the LOX gene families in plants include genes that have different expression patterns under various endogenous and external stimuli, which may reflect their involvement in specific growth- and stress-related processes. For instance, the LOX gene families of ginseng [18], cotton [21] and poplar [49] have been deeply characterized and the expression analysis has revealed that some LOX genes are specifically regulated in response to phytohormones, pathogens, wounding, and abiotic stresses. In this context, the results reported in the present study extend these knowledges to a monocot species in which the induction of LOX-encoding genes under environmental cues has never been explored previously.

2.4. LOX Activity in the Shoots of Seedlings Grown under Control, Mannitol and NaCl Stress

To check if the increase in the TdLpx-A2 transcript levels observed under stress was accompanied by a concomitant increase in the enzymatic activity, an experiment was carried out to evaluate the LOX activity in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control and stress conditions (Figure 4).
Under the control condition, the LOX activity showed two peaks, the smaller at pH 5.5, and the higher at pH 7.5 (Figure 4a), which suggested the presence in this tissue of at least two different LOX isoforms. The peak at pH 5.5 is compatible with the optimum observed at pH 5.3 in durum wheat semolina [38] and it is probably ascribable to the LOX isoforms present also in mature grains. Our previous findings revealed that the TdLpx-1 and TdLpx-3 genes were the only TdLpx genes expressed in mature grains [36,50]. Since in the shoots the TdLpx-3 genes are expressed at very low levels or are not expressed at all, it can be assumed that the LOX activity that peaked at pH 5.5 is due to the LOX1 isoforms encoded by TdLpx-1 genes. Conversely, the peak at pH 7.5, which has been not detected in durum wheat mature grains [36,50], is probably due to the TdLOX2 isoforms whose encoding genes (TdLpx-2) are expressed in the shoots but not in the mature grains.
In this regard, evidence has been reported in barley that the LOX2 isoform presented a broad peak at pH 7.0 [51], and its activity and protein levels increased in the coleoptiles during the first days of germination [34]. Consistent with these previous findings and with the increase in the expression of the TdLpx-A2 gene detected under the control condition (Figure 3), we observed an increase in the LOX activity at pH 7.5 that was particularly evident between the 2nd and the 4th DAS and continued at a slower rate until the end of the period examined, when the activity reached, on average, a value 48% higher than that observed at the 2nd DAS (Figure 4a). No significant variations were detected during seedling growth in the activity at pH 5.5 (Figure 4a), which is consistent with the stable transcript levels of the TdLpx-1 genes detected under the control condition (Figure 3).
Under mannitol and NaCl stress, a strong increase in the LOX activity that peaked at pH 7.5 occurred; in both cases, the increase was so great that it led to the complete disappearance of the peak at pH 5.5, which most likely remained unchanged under stress (Figure 4b,c). As already observed for the up-regulation of the TdLpx-A2 gene, NaCl had greater effect than mannitol. The increase observed under NaCl stress was particularly evident at the onset of germination (between the 2nd and the 3rd DAS), whereas mannitol stress caused a gradual increase over time (Figure 4b,c). At the end of the period examined, the LOX activity under mannitol stress was on average threefold higher than that measured under the control condition, whereas an average ten-fold increase was observed under salinity (Figure 4b,c).
These findings demonstrate that the seedling growth process, as well as the hyperosmotic stress imposition, cause variations in the enzyme activity that are comparable to those observed for the expression levels of the TdLpx-A2 gene. Such a closely coupled relationship strengthen our hypothesis that the TdLOX2 isoform encoded by the TdLpx-A2 gene is responsible for the LOX activity that peaks at pH 7.5. However, this straight relationship should be seen with caution. In addition to the increase in the de novo synthesis of the TdLOX2 isoform due to the induction of TdLpx-A2 gene expression, a regulation of the enzyme at post-transcriptional and/or post-translational level cannot be excluded. At this regard, it is known that in plants exposed to stress conditions LOXs can be regulated by other mechanisms besides gene induction, which include the alternative splicing, phosphorylation, allosteric modulation and protein-protein interaction [52]. Anyway, our findings represent a relevant progress on this topic because they represent the first detailed evidence of the significance of LOXs in general, and of the TdLOX2 in particular, in the physiological processes and the stress-related responses of durum wheat. The only other observation on this species was reported by our research group and concerned the involvement of LOX activity in the process of leaf senescence [53]. Whether the TdLOX2 induction is a genotype-specific response that contributes to the salinity tolerance of the cv. ‘Ofanto’ remains to be established. Future studies on the comparison of different genotypes could help to clarify this point.
It is noteworthy that the TdLpx-A2 gene expression and the LOX activity, similarly to the MDA content and the superoxide anion generation, are affected by both the osmotic and the ion-toxic component of the NaCl stress. This observation raises the possibility that these metabolic responses are somehow related to each other and indicates that the pathway in which they are possibly involved represents a sensitive target of the toxic stress.

2.5. Isolation and Characterization of the Full-Length TdLpx-A2 Transcript

To investigate about the role of the TdLOX2 isoform in the durum wheat response to hyperosmotic stresses, the full-length coding sequence of the TdLpx-A2 gene was isolated after the cDNA amplification from the shoots of control durum wheat seedlings at the 2nd DAS. The sequence was deposited at NCBI GenBank database under the accession number MT843321. The full-length TdLpx-A2 transcript harboured an open reading frame (ORF) of 2595 nucleotides encoding a putative translation product of 864 amino acids with a molecular mass of about 96.75 kDa and a pI of about 6.1, estimated using the ProtParam tool [54].
The phylogenetic tree of the deduced amino acid sequence of the TdLOX2 identified in the present study, along with LOXs from other plant species, showed that the TdLOX2 belonged to the type-1 9-LOX group (Figure 5). As already observed, LOXs from monocots and dicots in this group formed two separated clusters [49,55], thus suggesting that these genes have evolved after monocot-dicot divergence. In the monocot cluster, TdLOX2 shared 60.5% to 98.6% identity with the other cereal LOXs, with the lowest identity shared with the barley LOXB (HvLOXB) and the highest with bread wheat LOX2 (TaLOX2). TdLOX2 shared also high identity (93.3%) with the barely LOX2 (HvLOX2).
Highly conserved regions were identified in the TdLOX2 through comparison with 9-LOXs from other cereal species (Figure 6a,b): (i) the N-terminal PLAT/LH2 domain (domain I) that forms a β-barrel structure that targets the substrate to the active site; (ii) the C-terminal pfam00305 domain (domains II-V), which includes the conserved regions that are important for substrate and oxygen binding; and (iii) the hystidine (H520, H525 and H711), asparagine (N715), and isoleucine (I864) residues that are essential for iron binding. This organization is in line with the crystal structure determined by Minor and coworkers [56] for the soybean LOX1, which consisted of four smaller domains that associated on the surface of a larger C-terminal domain. Notably, TdLOX2, together with TaLOX2 and HvLOX2, differs from the other cereal 9-LOXs in that the arginine (R) residue in the TV/R motif, responsible for the positional specificity of 9-LOXs [7], is substituted by a lysine (K) residue (Figure 6a); this substitution gives rise to an unusual TV/K motif, which, to our knowledge, has not been described previously in other plant species.
A search for intracellular sorting and processing peptides (TargetP 1.1, http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/; ipSORT, http://ipsort.hgc.jp/) in the predicted amino acid sequence of TdLOX2 suggested that this protein is probably located in the cytosol as it does not contain targeting or retention signals for any organelles. This is expected since the phylogenetic analysis revealed that TdLOX2 belonged to the type-1 LOX group.

2.6. Functional Characterization of the Recombinant TdLOX2

To assess the biochemical properties of the TdLOX2 encoded by the TdLpx-A2 gene, the coding region of the gene was placed under the control of the L-(+)-arabinose promoter of an E. coli expression vector and the His-tagged protein was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The recombinant protein was used to determine the substrate and product specificity of the TdLOX2, as well as its dependence on pH and its sensitivity to specific LOX inhibitors.
The Km and Vmax values obtained for linoleic, linolenic and arachidonic acids revealed that the TdLOX2 showed the highest substrate affinity and specific activity towards linoleic acid, although it also showed a good preference for linolenic acid; conversely, a very low affinity and specific activity towards arachidonic acid was observed (Table 1). These results indicated that the TdLOX2 preferred linoleic acid as substrate. The Km value for linoleic acid was of the same order of magnitude than that reported for the LOX2 isoform purified from germinated barley (74 µM vs. 180 µM) [57], although much lower values (16–19 µM) have been also reported for the barley LOX2 [51,58]. The observed differences may be ascribable to the different solubilization methods used for the preparation of the linoleate solution; so, comparison of the Km values obtained here and in other studies is not possible.
Given the preference of the TdLOX2 for linoleate, this was used as substrate for the evaluation of its product specificity, pH profile and sensitivity to specific LOX inhibitors. To study the product specificity, the reaction products of the TdLOX2 were separated by straight phase (SP)-HPLC. Surprisingly, according to the retention times of authentic 9- and 13-hydroperoxide derivatives of linoleic acid (HPOD), the recombinant TdLOX2 was found to produce exclusively 13-HPOD (Figure 7). This observation did not fit the positional specificity predicted by the phylogenetic analysis, which assigned the TdLOX2 to the type-19-LOX group. We can speculate that the presence in the TdLOX2 amino acid sequence of the unusual TV/K motif in place of the canonical TV/R motif could be responsible for this unexpected position specificity. This hypothesis is corroborated by previous findings that revealed the 13-HPOD as the only reaction product of the barley HvLOX2 [51], which shared with TdLOX2 and TaLOX2 the same unusual TV/K motif (Figure 6a). The LOX-derived 13-HPOD is the first substrate in the synthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) via allene oxide synthase and grean leaf volatiles (GLV) via hydroperoxide lyase. Unlike dicots, in which these two pathways are commonly co-localized to the chloroplast, in monocots evidence has been reported that only the JA biosynthesis takes place in the chloroplast, whereas the biosynthesis of GLV occurs outside the chloroplasts [59]. In the light of this, it might be possible that under stress TdLOX2 takes part to the GLV production. In this context, recent findings have demonstrated the protective and priming effect of GLV not only against pathogens and wounding but also against abiotic stresses [60] including salinity [61].
For the pH dependence, a single bell-shaped curve was observed (Figure 8a). The LOX activity of the recombinant protein increased in the pH range of 4.0 to 7.2, at which the activity reached its optimum; at higher pH values, the activity decreased to almost undetectable levels below pH 9.0 (Figure 8a). Interestingly, the pH range of action and the pH optimum of the recombinant TdLOX2 are comparable to those of the second higher peak detected for the LOX activity in the shoots (Figure 4). This further supports our belief that the up-regulation of the TdLpx-A2 gene and the consequent de novo synthesis of the TdLOX2 enzyme represents the molecular mechanism responsible for the increase in the enzyme activity detected in the 6.0–8.0 pH range in the course of seedling growth and in response to hyperosmotic stress imposition (Figure 4).
The recombinant enzyme was found to be sensitive to the specific LOX inhibitors salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM) and propyl gallate (PG) [62]. In particular, about 70% inhibition of the LOX activity was observed in the presence of 1 mM SHAM, whereas an almost complete inhibition (99%) occurred in the presence of 1 mM PG (Figure 8b).

2.7. Effect of PG on the LOX Activity, the MDA Content and the Rate of Superoxide Anion Generation in the Shoots of Seedlings Grown under Control, Mannitol and NaCl Stress Conditions

To examine if and how inhibition of LOX activity in the shoots alters the accumulation of ROS and the peroxidation of membrane lipids promoted by hyperosmotic stresses, an experiment was carried out in which the seedling growth solutions (water, mannitol or NaCl) were supplemented with 1 mM PG. To monitor the activity ascribable to the TdLOX2, the enzymatic assays were carried out at pH 7.5. After 6 DAS, treatment of durum wheat seedlings with PG was accompanied by a strong inhibition of the LOX activity on average by 68%, 72% and 78% under control, mannitol and NaCl stress, respectively (Figure 9a). The MDA content was also significantly reduced by the PG treatment but to a lesser extent; in particular, an average 48% decrease was observed under the control condition that dropped to 21–24% under the stress conditions (Figure 9b).
Evidence exists that the LOX-catalyzed peroxidation of membrane lipids is a key mechanism in the adaptative response to abiotic and biotic stresses in different plants species [63]. Therefore, based on these observations, it was expected that the stress-induced MDA accumulation would be more strongly inhibited by PG treatment. Instead, our results show that the decrease in the membrane lipid peroxidation induced by PG under stress is limited compared to the decrease in the LOX activity observed under the same conditions.
This suggests that TdLOX2 gives a minor contribution to the total membrane lipid peroxidation under hyperosmotic stresses, and raises the possibility that other mechanisms, such as the non-enzymatic oxidation induced by ROS accumulation, are involved.
As far as the rate of superoxide anion generation, the PG treatment caused no significant variation in the shoots of seedlings grown under the control condition but, surprisingly, a significant variation was observed under stress, with an average increase of 44% and 60% under mannitol and NaCl stress, respectively (Figure 9c). The increased rate of the superoxide anion generation observed under stress as a consequence of the LOX inhibition by PG suggests an involvement of the LOX activity in the control of the ROS generation induced by stress. The existence of a link between plant LOXs and ROS has been clearly demonstrated in transgenic plants subjected to hyperosmotic stresses. The increased tolerance to water deficit and high salinity shown by Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the pepper CaLOX1 gene [19] or the persimmon DkLOX3 gene [20] was found to be accompanied by a lower accumulation of ROS compared to the wild-type plants. In addition, the silencing of cotton GhLOX12 and GhLOX13, as well as the overexpression of ZmLOX1 gene in rice demonstrated that the involvement of LOXs in the control of ROS accumulation under hyperosmotic stresses was linked to the activation of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase [21,64].
Altogether, our findings suggest that under osmotic and salt stress ROS play a relevant role in the peroxidation of membrane lipids. The up-regulation of the TdLpx-A2 gene and the concomitant increase in the TdLOX2 may represent a protective mechanism that keeps the stress-triggered ROS generation under control and prevent excessive accumulation of MDA. At low level, both MDA and ROS can have beneficial effects through the activation of regulatory genes involved in plant defense response and granting cell protection under oxidative stress conditions, which ultimately results in plant survival under stress [65]. Consistently, our results show that in durum wheat the TdLpx-A2 expression and the TdLOX2 activity represent more sensitive targets of the salt stress-induced toxic effect than either germination or growth; so, it is feasible that their prompt activation under salinity might help to prevent ion-toxic inhibition of early seedling growth.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Growth of Control and Stressed Seedlings

Control seedlings were obtained by sowing durum wheat seeds from the cv. ‘Ofanto’ on Whatman filter paper supported by polyurethane foam saturated with distilled water. The seedlings were grown in an incubator (HPS 1500, Heraeus Vötsch, Hanau, Germany) in the dark for 6 days at 25 °C and 80–85% relative humidity. Salt stress was imposed by substituting water with 0.21 M NaCl, which induces a severe stress on the basis of durum wheat salt tolerance [66], whereas, to estimate the osmotic component of salt stress, 0.42 M mannitol solution iso-osmotic with the salt solution was used. In the experiment reported in Figure 9, the growth solution was supplemented with 1 mM PG. Germination and growth parameters were determined on fresh material, whereas the biochemical assays and the RNA extraction were carried out on the shoots harvested and stored at −80 °C.

3.2. Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Measurements

The germination percentage was recorded daily up to 7 DAS, using the extrusion of a 0.2 cm long radicle as a criterion. The mean germination time (MGT) expressed in days was calculated by using the following equation:
MGT = Σ(D × n)/Σn
where D is the number of days from the onset of germination, n is the number of seeds that had germinated on day D and Σn is the total number of germinated seeds [67]. Root and shoot growth in terms of lengths was measured and expressed as mean of 10 plants for each of the three replicates used for each treatment.

3.3. Measurement of the MDA Content

The MDA content was measured using a modified method based on Zhang and coworkers [68]. Briefly, durum wheat shoots of control and stressed seedlings from 2 to 6 DAS were homogenized under nitrogen, using a pre-chilled mortar and pestle. Three hundred mg of ground samples were resuspended in 5 mL 5% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Two mL of the supernatant were mixed with 5 mL of 5% thiobarbituric acid and the mixture was incubated in boiling water for 15 min and then cooled on ice to stop the reaction. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 450, 532 and 600 nm and the MDA content was calculated and expressed as µmol per g dry weight (DW) of shoot tissue.

3.4. Measurement of the Superoxide Anion Generation Rate

The rate of the superoxide anion generation was determined according to Misra and Fridovich [69] by measuring the oxidation of epinephrine to adrenochrome. Briefly, durum wheat shoots of control and stressed seedlings from 2 to 6 DAS were homogenized under nitrogen, using a pre-chilled mortar and pestle. One gram of ground samples was resuspended in 10 mL cold 50 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and centrifuged (twice) at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min. Total protein content of the crude shoot extract was determined by a modified-Lowry assay [70], using bovine serum albumin as the standard. Five hundred µg of crude shoot extract were added to a reaction mixture containing 1 mM epinephrine in 2 mL 50 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and the rate of the superoxide anion generation was measured by following the absorbance increase at 480 nm due to the epinephrine conversion to adrenochrome (ε480 nm = 4.00 mM−1·cm−1). The rate was expressed as µmol superoxide anion produced per min per g DW of shoot tissue.

3.5. Expression Analysis of the TdLpx Genes

Extraction of the total RNA was carried out from the shoots of control and stressed seedlings from 2 to 6 DAS using Trizol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the first-strand cDNA was synthesised from 1 µg total RNA using the SuperScript™ II RNase H- reverse transcriptase (200 E.U., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and random primers. The first-strand cDNA was used as the template to amplify the fragments corresponding to the TdLpx transcripts using the specific primer pairs reported in Table 2.
As regards the TdLpx-B1 genes, the cv. ‘Ofanto’ possesses the haplotype III that bears the TdLpx-B1.1 and TdLpx-B1.2 genes [36]; so, for the expression analysis of these genes, the primer pairs were designed on the corresponding full-length transcript sequences (NCBI GenBank accession numbers HM126475 and HM126472, respectively) previously isolated by our research group [36]. For the expression analysis of the TdLpx-2 and TdLpx-3 genes, the primer pairs were designed on the coding portions of the partial gene sequences isolated by Carrera and coworkers [35] (NCBI GenBank accession numbers DQ448001-DQ448004).
The PCR was performed with Go-Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as follows: 5 min initial denaturation at 94 °C, then 28 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 62 °C to 72 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, followed by 5 min final extension at 72 °C. The PCR normalization was carried out by amplification of the constitutive actin1 gene using the primer pairs reported in Table 2. The PCR was performed with Go-Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) as follows: 5 min initial denaturation at 94 °C, then 28 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 62 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, followed by 5 min final extension at 72 °C. The PCR products were separated on agarose gel, stained with Gel Red (Biotium, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) and analyzed under UV light. The amplified PCR products were cloned and sequenced on both strands to confirm their identity.

3.6. Isolation of the Full-Length TdLpx-A2 Transcript

To identify the full-length sequence of the TdLpx-A2 gene, A BLAST search was carried out in the Interomics cv. ‘Svevo’ genome browser (http://d-gbrowse.interomics.eu/gb2/gbrowse/Svevo/) using as query the full-length sequence of the bread wheat TaLOX2 gene (NCBI GenBank accession number GQ166691) [71]. Two Td-Lpx-2 genes were identified on chromosome 5A and 5B, which shared more than 99% identity with the partial sequences isolated by Carrera and coworkers [35] and corresponding to the TdLpx-A2 and the TdLpx-B2 genes (NCBI GenBank accession numbers DQ448002 and DQ448001, respectively).
Extraction of the total RNA was carried out from the shoots of control seedlings at the 2nd DAS and first-strand cDNA was used as the template to amplify the full-length TdLpx-A2 transcript (NCBI GenBank accession number MT843321) using the primer pair 5′-ATGTTCGGCGTCGG CGGCATCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCAGATGGAGATGCTGTTGGGGATGC-3′ (reverse) designed on the TdLpx-A2 gene identified in the genome of the cv. ‘Svevo’. The PCR was carried out using the Taq High Fidelity Phusion (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as follows: 2 min initial denaturation at 94 °C, then 35 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 30 s at 66 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, followed by 7 min final extension at 72 °C. The PCR product was separated on agarose gel, stained with Gel Red (Biotium, Inc.) and analyzed under UV light. The amplified PCR product was cloned and sequenced on both strands to confirm its identity.

3.7. Heterologous Expression of the TdLOX2 in E. coli

For the heterologous expression of the TdLOX2 enzyme in E. coli, the ORF of the TdLpx-A2 transcript was cloned using the Gateway system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, the ORF of the TdLpx-A2 gene was cloned into the pCR8/GW/TOPO entry vector using the TA cloning and then transferred into the pDEST17 destination vector through an LR recombination reaction. The resulting expression clone pDEST17-6 × His-TdLOX2 was used to transform TOP10 (DH5α) competent E. coli cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) that were grown overnight on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates containing 100 µg mL−1 ampicillin. Positive clones were identified by PCR and sequenced on both strands to verify that the ORF was ligated in-frame with the 6 × His tag. A single colony was used to inoculate LB medium (10 mL) containing 100 µg mL−1 ampicillin and the culture was incubated at 37 °C with shaking until the optical density at 600 (OD600) nm reached 0.5. This pre-culture was used to inoculate 500 mL fresh LB medium containing 100 µg mL−1 ampicillin to obtain a new culture with an OD600 of 0.05–0.1 that was incubated at 37 °C with shaking, until it reached the mid-log phase (OD600 ≅ 0.4). Then, the expression of the recombinant protein was induced by the addition of 0.2% (v/v) L-(+)-arabinose and, after incubation at 25 °C for 15 h, 100-mL culture aliquots were centrifuged at 5000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The cell pellets were frozen under liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until purification of the recombinant protein.
Separation of the E. coli protein fractions was carried out using CelLytic B Plus protein extraction kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Briefly, roughly 2 g of transformed E. coli BL21-AI (DE3) cells were resuspended in CelLytic B Plus working, the suspension was incubated at room temperature with shaking for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 1900× g for 15 min. The soluble fraction present in the supernatant was precipitated with solid ammonium sulphate (70% saturation) and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 5000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, and dissolved in 2 mL 50 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 500 mM NaCl and 30 mM imidazole (Buffer A). The suspension was dialyzed overnight at 4 °C to remove the residual ammonium sulphate, whereas the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The recombinant protein was purified by loading the resulting preparation onto a 4-mL Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity column pre-equilibrated with buffer A. After two washes with buffer A containing 50 mM imidazole, the recombinant protein was eluted with buffer A containing 300 mM imidazole. Five-hundred-microliters fractions were collected and their protein content was measured by using a modified-Lowry assay [70], with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Fractions containing the highest concentrations of protein were pooled and dialyzed against 50 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 150 mM NaCl and 20% glycerol.

3.8. Measurement of the LOX Activity

The LOX activity was assayed essentially as reported in Pastore and coworkers [38] by measuring the absorbance increase at 234 nm due to the conversion of polyunsaturated fatty acids into the corresponding hydroperoxide (ε234 = 28 mM−1·cm−1). Unless otherwise specified, the reaction mixture consisted of 2 mL 50 mM Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM linoleate. The reaction was started by the addition of 0.02–0.05 mg crude shoot extract or 1–5 µg TdLOX2 recombinant protein. One E.U. corresponded to the formation of 1 µmol conjugated diene per min at 25 °C. GRAFIT 5.0 software (ERITHACUS, from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to analyse the data.

3.9. Analysis of the TdLOX2 Reaction Products

The identity of the reaction products of the recombinant TdLOX2 was determined according to the method described by Zhang and coworkers [72] with minor modifications by using an Agilent 1200 Series HPLC system (Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a diode array detector. The enzymatic reaction was carried out as described above (see paragraph 3.8.) and after 30 min was stopped by the addition of 1N HCl; n-hexane was then added to the reaction mixture and the reaction products were extracted by shaking. Separation of the reaction products was carried out by SP-HPLC on a SUPELCOSIL LC-SI column (3 µm, 15 cm × 4.6 mm, Supelco Analytical, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The eluent was composed of n-hexane/2-propanol/acetic acid (100:2:0.1, by volume) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL min−1 and the effluent was monitored at 234 nm, which indicated the conjugated diene system. To identify the TdLOX2 reaction products, their retention times were compared with those of authentic 13- and 9-HPOD isomers (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).

4. Conclusions

In summary, although durum wheat is an important agro-economical crop, little is known about genes involved in its defensive functions against environmental stresses. The present study provides evidence that the TdLpx-A2 gene is up-regulated by osmotic and high salinity stress and that its encoded TdLOX2 isoform plays a positive role in durum wheat response to hyperosomotic stresses probably acting through the control of ROS accumulation and the prevention of oxidative damages that occur in plants under stress. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the TdLOX2-mediated pathway under stress still remains unclear. This study provides a foundation for future investigations on overexpressed and/or knockout lines of the TdLpx-A2 gene, as well as on the identification of TdLOX2-derived products. Comparison between tolerant, semi-tolerant, and susceptible genotypes will be also useful to answer the questions related to the physiological significance of this LOX isoform in durum wheat response to hyperosmotic stress.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.T.; Formal analysis, V.M. and D.T.; Investigation, V.M. and D.T.; Methodology, V.M. and D.T.; Supervision, D.T.; Writing—original draft, V.M. and D.T.; Writing—review & editing, D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Michele Savino for his assistance in the SP-HPLC measurements and Vanessa De Simone for her technical assistance in the cloning of the TdLpx-A2 gene.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pasternak, D.; Malach, Y.D. Crop irrigation with saline water. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 599–622. [Google Scholar]
  2. Greenway, H.; Munns, R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31, 149–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hu, Y.; Fromm, J.; Schmidhalter, U. Effect of salinity on tissue architecture in expanding wheat leaves. Planta 2005, 220, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alscher, R.G.; Donahue, J.L.; Cramer, C.L. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants: Relationships in green cells. Physiol. Plant. 1997, 1001, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Siedow, J.N. Plant lipoxygenase: Structure and function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 42, 145–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feussner, I.; Wasternack, C. The lipoxygenase pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, D.-S.; Nioche, P.; Hamberg, M.; Raman, C. Structural insights into the evolutionary paths of oxylipin biosynthetic enzymes. Nature 2008, 455, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kolomiets, M.; Hannapel, D.; Chen, H.; Tymeson, M.; Gladon, R. Lipoxygenase is involved in the control of potato tuber development. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santino, A.; Iannacone, R.; Hughes, R.; Casey, R.; Mita, G. Cloning and characterisation of an almond 9-lipoxygenase expressed early during seed development. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vellosillo, T.; Martinez, M.; Lopez, M.A.; Vicente, J.; Cascon, T.; Dolan, L.; Hamberg, M.; Castresana, C. Oxylipins produced by the 9-lipoxygenase pathway in Arabidopsis regulate lateral root development and defense responses through a specific signaling cascade. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 831–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gao, X.; Starr, J.; Göbel, C.; Engelberth, J.; Feussner, I.; Tumlinson, J.; Kolomiets, M. Maize 9-lipoxygenase ZmLOX3 controls development, root-specific expression of defense genes, and resistance to root-knot nematodes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. León-Morcillo, R.J.; Ocampo, J.A.; García Garrido, J.M. Plant 9-lox oxylipin metabolism in response to arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1584–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Porta, H.; Figueroa-Balderas, R.E.; Rocha-Sosa, M. Wounding and pathogen infection induce a chloroplast-targeted lipoxygenase in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Planta 2008, 227, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Prasad, A.; Sedlářová, M.; Kale, R.S.; Pospíšil, P. Lipoxygenase in singlet oxygen generation as a response to wounding: In vivo imaging in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cacas, J.L.; Vailleau, F.; Devoine, C.; Ennar, N.; Agnel, J.P.; Tronchet, M.; Ponchet, M.; Blein, J.P.; Roby, D.; Triantaphylides, C.; et al. The combined action of 9 lipoxygenase and galactolipase is sufficient to bring about programmed cell death during tobacco hypersensitive response. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hwang, I.S.; Hwang, B.K. The pepper 9-lipoxygenase gene CaLOX1 functions in defense and cell death responses to microbial pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 948–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bae, K.S.; Rahimi, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Devi, B.S.R.; Khorolragchaa, A.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Silva, J.; Myagmarjav, D.; Yang, D.C. Molecular characterization of lipoxygenase genes and their expression analysis against biotic and abiotic stresses in Panax ginseng. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 145, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, C.W.; Han, S.-W.; Hwang, I.S.; Kim, D.S.; Hwang, B.K.; Lee, S.C. The pepper lipoxygenase CaLOX1 plays a role in osmotic, drought and high salinity stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hou, Y.; Meng, K.; Han, Y.; Ban, Q.; Wang, B.; Suo, J.; Lv, J.; Rao, J. The persimmon 9-lipoxygenase gene DkLOX3 plays positive roles in both promoting senescence and enhancing tolerance to abiotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shaban, M.; Ahmed, M.M.; Sun, H.; Ullah, A.; Zhu, L. Genome-wide identification of lipoxygenase gene family in cotton and functional characterization in response to abiotic stresses. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.; Gao, G.; Cao, S.; Xie, Q.; Qi, H. Isolation and functional validation of the CmLOX08 promoter associated with signalling molecule and abiotic stress responses in oriental melon, Cucumis melo var. makuwa Makino. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Maccarrone, M.; Veldinka, G.A.; Finazzi Agrò, A.; Vliegenthart, J.F.G. Modulation of soybean lipoxygenase expression and membrane oxidation by water deficit. FEBS Lett. 1995, 371, 223–226. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sofo, A.; Dichio, B.; Xiloyannis, C.; Masia, A. Lipoxygenase activity and proline accumulation in leaves and roots of olive trees in response to drought stress. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 121, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodríguez-Rosales, M.P.; Kerkeb, L.; Bueno, P.; Donaire, J.P. Changes induced by NaCl in lipid content and composition, lipoxygenase, plasma membrane H+-ATPase and antioxidant enzyme activities of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum. Mill) calli. Plant Sci. 1999, 143, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mostofa, M.G.; Hossain, M.A.; Fujita, M. Trehalose pretreatment induces salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings: Oxidative damage and co-induction of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Protoplasma 2015, 252, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delaplace, P.; Frettinger, P.; Ghanem, M.E.; Blondiaux, A.; Bauwens, J.; Cotton, S.; De Clerck, C.; Dewalque, A.; Guy, J.; Heuze, F. Lipoxygenase pathway and antioxidant system in salt stressed tomato seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2009, 13, 529–536. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mittova, V.; Tal, M.; Volokita, M.; Guy, M. Salt stress induces up-regulation of an efficient chloroplast antioxidant system in the salt-tolerant wild tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii but not in the cultivated species. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 115, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rana, G.; Katerji, N. Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: A review. Eur. J. Agron. 2000, 13, 125–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Caliandro, A.; Cucci, G.; De Caro, A.; Cordella, S. Irrigation with brackish water: Influence of the irrigation regime on salt built-up in the soil and leaching effect of rainfall. In Proceedings of the European Mediterranean Conference on the Use of Saline Water in Irrigation, Bari, Italy, 25–26 July 1991. [Google Scholar]
  31. Munns, R.; James, R.A.; Lauchli, A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1025–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Van Mechelen, J.R.; Smits, M.; Douma, A.C.; Rouster, J.; Cameron-Mills, V.; Heidekamp, F.; Valk, B.E. Primary structure of a lipoxygenase from barley grain as deduced from its cDNA sequence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995, 1254, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van Mechelen, J.R.; Schuurink, R.C.; Smits, M.; Graner, A.; Douma, A.C.; Sedee, N.J.A.; Schmitt, N.F.; Valk, B.E. Molecular characterization of two lipoxygenases from barley. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 39, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Holtman, W.L.; van Duijn, G.; Sedee, N.J.A.; Douma, A.C. Differential expression of lipoxygenase isoenzymes in embryos of germinating barley. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Carrera, A.; Echenique, V.; Zhang, W.; Helguera, M.; Manthey, F.; Schrager, A.; Picca, A.; Cervigni, G.; Dubcovsky, J. A deletion at the Lpx-B1 locus is associated with low lipoxygenase activity and improved pasta color in durum wheat, Triticum turgidum ssp. durum. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 45, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Verlotta, A.; De Simone, V.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Cattivelli, L.; Papa, R.; Trono, D. Insight durum wheat Lpx-B1: A small gene family coding for Lipoxygenase (LOX) responsible for carotenoid bleaching in mature grains. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Garbus, I.; Soresi, D.; Romero, J.; Echenique, V. Identification, mapping and evolutionary course of wheat lipoxygenase-1 genes located on the A genome. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 58, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pastore, D.; Trono, D.; Padalino, L.; Simone, S.; Valenti, D.; Di Fonzo, N.; Passerella, S. Inhibition by α-tocopherol and L-ascorbate of linoleate hydroperoxidation and β-carotene bleaching activities in durum wheat semolina. J. Cereal Sci. 2000, 31, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Borrelli, G.M.; Fragasso, M.; Nigro, F.; Platani, C.; Papa, R.; Beleggia, R.; Trono, D. Analysis of metabolic and mineral changes in response to salt stress in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum) genotypes, which differ in salinity tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 133, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Borrelli, G.M.; Ficco, D.B.M.; Giuzio, L.; Pompa, M.; Cattivelli, L.; Flagella, Z. Durum wheat salt tolerance in relation to physiological, yield and quality characters. Cereal Res. Commun. 2011, 39, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Almansouri, M.; Kinet, J.-M.; Lutts, S. Effect of salt and osmotic stresses on germination in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Plant Soil 2001, 231, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Flagella, Z.; Trono, D.; Pompa, M.; Di Fonzo, N.; Pastore, D. Seawater stress applied at germination affects mitochondrial function in durum wheat (Triticum durum) early seedlings. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nagel, M.; Navakode, S.; Scheibal, V.; Baum, M.; Nachit, M.; Röder, M.S.; Börner, A. The genetic basis of durum wheat germination and seedling growth under osmotic stress. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yildirim, M.; Kizilgexi, F.; Akinci, C.; Albayrak, O. Response of durum wheat seedlings to salinity. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2015, 43, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Alom, R.; Hasan, M.A.; Islam, M.R.; Wang, Q.-F. Germination characters and early seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under salt stress conditions. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 19, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tester, M.; Davenport, R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Alché, J.D. A concise appraisal of lipid oxidation and lipoxidation in higher plants. Redox Biol. 2019, 23, 101136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bali, A.S.; Sidhu, G.P.S. Abiotic stress-induced oxidative stress in wheat. In Wheat Production in Changing Environments; Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Hossain, M.A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2019; pp. 225–239. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Yan, H.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Cai, R.; Xiang, Y. The lipoxygenase gene family in poplar: Identification, classification, and expression in response to MeJA treatment. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. De Simone, V.; Menzo, V.; De Leonardis, A.M.; Ficco, D.B.M.; Trono, D.; Cattivelli, L.; De Vita, P. Different mechanisms control lipoxygenase activity in durum wheat kernels. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 52, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Doderer, A.; Kokkelink, I.; Van der Ween, S.; Valk, B.I.; Schram, A.W.; Douma, A.C. Purification and characterization of two lipoxygenase isoenzymes from germinating barley. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1120, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pokotylo, I.V.; Kolesnikov, Y.S.; Derevyanchuk, M.V.; Kharitonenko, A.I.; Kravets, V.S. Lipoxygenases and plant cell metabolism regulation. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2015, 87, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. De Simone, V.; Soccio, M.; Borrelli, G.M.; Pastore, D.; Trono, D. Stay-green trait-antioxidant status interrelationship in durum wheat (Triticum durum) flag leaf during post-flowering. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in ExPASy server. In Methods in Molecular Biology, 2-D Proteome Analysis Protocols; Link, A.J., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 1998; Volume 112, pp. 531–552. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sarde, S.J.; Kumar, A.; Remme, R.N.; Dicke, M. Genome-wide identification, classification and expression of lipoxygenase gene family in pepper. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Minor, W.; Steczko, J.; Stec, B.; Otwinowski, Z.; Bolin, J.T.; Walter, R.; Axelrod, B. Crystal structure of soybean lipoxygenase L-1 at 1.4 Å resolution. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 10687–10701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hugues, M.; Boivin, P.; Gauillard, F.; Nicolas, J.; Thiry, J.M.; Richard-Forget, F. Two lipoxygenases from germinated barley-heat and kilning stability. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 885–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, G.; Schwarz, P.B.; Brady, A.V. Purification and characterization of lipoxygenase isoenzymes in germinating barley. Cereal Chem. 1993, 70, 589–595. [Google Scholar]
  59. Christensen, S.A.; Nemchenko, A.; Borrego, E.; Murray, I.; Sobhy, I.S.; Bosak, L.; DeBlasio, S.; Erb, M.; Robert, C.A.M.; Vaughn, K.A.; et al. The maize lipoxygenase, ZmLOX10, mediates green leaf volatile, jasmonate and herbivore-induced plant volatile production for defense against insect attack. Plant J. 2013, 74, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cofer, T.M.; Engelberth, M.; Engelberth, J. Green leaf volatiles protect maize (Zea mays) seedlings against damage from cold stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1673–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tian, S.; Guo, R.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Zhan, Y.; Ci, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Si, T. Priming with the green leaf volatile (Z)-3-hexeny-1-yl acetate enhances salinity stress tolerance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sanz, L.C.; Peréz, A.G.; Olías, J.M. The lipoxygenase in the plant kingdom. I. Property. Grasas y Aceites 1992, 43, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Babenko, L.M.; Shcherbatiuk, M.M.; Skaterna, T.D.; Kosakivska, I.V. Lipoxygenases and their metabolites in formation of plant stress tolerance. Ukr. Biochem. J. 2017, 89, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cho, K.; Kim, Y.C.; Woo, J.C.; Rakwald, R.; Agrawal, G.K.; Yoeun, S.; Hana, O. Transgenic expression of dual positional maize lipoxygenase-1 leads to the regulation of defense-related signaling molecules and activation of the antioxidative enzyme system in rice. Plant Sci. 2012, 185–186, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Morales, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Malondialdehyde: Facts and artifacts. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1246–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Francois, L.E.; Maas, E.V. Crop response and management of salt-affected soils. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 149–181. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ellis, R.H.; Roberts, E.H. Towards a rational basis for testing seed quality. In Seed Production; Hebblethwaite, P.D., Ed.; Butterworths: London, UK, 1980; pp. 605–635. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang, H.Y.; Jiang, Y.N.; He, Z.Y.; Ma, M. Cadmium accumulation and oxidative burst in garlic (Allium sativum). J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Misra, H.P.; Fridovich, I. The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 3170–3175. [Google Scholar]
  70. Harris, D.A. Spectrophotometric assays. In Spectrophotometry and Spectrofluorimetry: A Practical Approach; Bashford, C.L., Harris, D.A., Eds.; IRL Press: Oxford, UK, 1987; pp. 59–61. [Google Scholar]
  71. Feng, B.; Dong, Z.; Xu, Z.; An, X.; Qin, H.; Wu, N.; Wang, D.; Wang, T. Molecular analysis of lipoxygenase (LOX) genes in common wheat and phylogenetic investigation of LOX proteins from model and crop plants. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 52, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, C.; Cao, S.; Jin, Y.; Ju, L.; Chen, Q.; Xing, Q.; Qi, H. Melon13-lipoxygenase CmLOX18 may be involved in C6 volatiles biosynthesis in fruit. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Plants 09 01233 g001 550
Figure 1. Germination percentage (a), mean germination time (b), shoot length (c) and primary root length (d) of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. DAS, days after sowing. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Figure 1. Germination percentage (a), mean germination time (b), shoot length (c) and primary root length (d) of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. DAS, days after sowing. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Plants 09 01233 g001
Plants 09 01233 g002 550
Figure 2. Malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation (a) and superoxide anion (O2•−) production rate (b) in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. DAS, days after sowing. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Figure 2. Malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation (a) and superoxide anion (O2•−) production rate (b) in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. DAS, days after sowing. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Plants 09 01233 g002
Plants 09 01233 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression analysis of the TdLpx genes under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. Total RNA was isolated from shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control and stress conditions and subjected to semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis using the specific primer pairs and the amplification conditions reported in Methods. Normalization of the PCR reactions was performed by amplification of the constitutive actin1 gene. The number on each lane represents the day after sowing at which shoots were harvested.
Figure 3. Expression analysis of the TdLpx genes under control, mannitol and NaCl stress conditions. Total RNA was isolated from shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control and stress conditions and subjected to semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis using the specific primer pairs and the amplification conditions reported in Methods. Normalization of the PCR reactions was performed by amplification of the constitutive actin1 gene. The number on each lane represents the day after sowing at which shoots were harvested.
Plants 09 01233 g003
Plants 09 01233 g004 550
Figure 4. LOX activity in the crude extract from the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control (a), mannitol (b) and NaCl stress (c) conditions. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods using 1 mM Na linoleate as substrate. The buffers were as follows: 50 mM Na acetate, pH 4.0–5.5; 50 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Figure 4. LOX activity in the crude extract from the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control (a), mannitol (b) and NaCl stress (c) conditions. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods using 1 mM Na linoleate as substrate. The buffers were as follows: 50 mM Na acetate, pH 4.0–5.5; 50 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Plants 09 01233 g004
Plants 09 01233 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences of selected plant LOXs. Alignments were calculated using Vector NTI Suite software (Ver. 10.3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The NCBI GenBank accession numbers of the LOXs included in the analysis are as follows: Arabidopsis thaliana (AtLOX1, Q06327; AtLOX2, P38418; AtLOX3, Q9SMW1; AtLOX4, Q9FNX8; AtLOX5, Q9FNX7; AtLOX6, Q9CAG3), Cucumis sativus (CsLOX4, CAB83038), Glycine max (GmLOX1, P08170; GmLOX3, P09186; GmLOX5, AAB67732; GmLOX10, ABS32276), Hordeum vulgare (HvLOX1, AAA64893; HvLOX2, AAB70865; HvLOX2.3, Q8GSM2; HvLOXB, AAB60715), Oryza sativa (OsLOX1, Q76I22; OsLOX3, Q7G794; OsLOX5, XP_015637182; OsLOX8, XP_015650450), Pisum sativum (PsLOX1, AB71759; PsLOX2, P14856; PsLOX3, P09918; PsLOX7, CAC04380), Solanum tuberosum (SlLOXA, P38415; SlLOXB, P38416; SlLOXC, Q96573; SlLOXD, Q96574; SlLOXE, Q43501), Triticum aestivum (TaLOX1, ACS34909; TaLOX2, ACS34908; TaLOX3, ADZ31265), Triticum durum (TdLOX2, MT843321), Zea mais (ZmLOX1, AAL73499; ZmLOX2, AAF76207).
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences of selected plant LOXs. Alignments were calculated using Vector NTI Suite software (Ver. 10.3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The NCBI GenBank accession numbers of the LOXs included in the analysis are as follows: Arabidopsis thaliana (AtLOX1, Q06327; AtLOX2, P38418; AtLOX3, Q9SMW1; AtLOX4, Q9FNX8; AtLOX5, Q9FNX7; AtLOX6, Q9CAG3), Cucumis sativus (CsLOX4, CAB83038), Glycine max (GmLOX1, P08170; GmLOX3, P09186; GmLOX5, AAB67732; GmLOX10, ABS32276), Hordeum vulgare (HvLOX1, AAA64893; HvLOX2, AAB70865; HvLOX2.3, Q8GSM2; HvLOXB, AAB60715), Oryza sativa (OsLOX1, Q76I22; OsLOX3, Q7G794; OsLOX5, XP_015637182; OsLOX8, XP_015650450), Pisum sativum (PsLOX1, AB71759; PsLOX2, P14856; PsLOX3, P09918; PsLOX7, CAC04380), Solanum tuberosum (SlLOXA, P38415; SlLOXB, P38416; SlLOXC, Q96573; SlLOXD, Q96574; SlLOXE, Q43501), Triticum aestivum (TaLOX1, ACS34909; TaLOX2, ACS34908; TaLOX3, ADZ31265), Triticum durum (TdLOX2, MT843321), Zea mais (ZmLOX1, AAL73499; ZmLOX2, AAF76207).
Plants 09 01233 g005
Plants 09 01233 g006a 550Plants 09 01233 g006b 550
Figure 6. Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of the TdLOX2. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of the TdLOX2 with other LOXs from monocots (a). Conserved domains (from I to V) as assigned by Minor and coworkers [56] are underlined. Asterisks indicate residues required for iron binding. The 9-LOX-specific TV/R motif is boxed. The alignments were performed using Vector NTI Suite software (Ver. 10.3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). N-terminal PLAT domain and typical LOX domain in the TdLOX2 as identified by the NCBI Conserved Domain Search Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml) (b).
Figure 6. Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of the TdLOX2. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of the TdLOX2 with other LOXs from monocots (a). Conserved domains (from I to V) as assigned by Minor and coworkers [56] are underlined. Asterisks indicate residues required for iron binding. The 9-LOX-specific TV/R motif is boxed. The alignments were performed using Vector NTI Suite software (Ver. 10.3.0, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). N-terminal PLAT domain and typical LOX domain in the TdLOX2 as identified by the NCBI Conserved Domain Search Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml) (b).
Plants 09 01233 g006aPlants 09 01233 g006b
Plants 09 01233 g007 550
Figure 7. Determination of the positional specificity of the recombinant TdLOX2. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods. SP-HPLC analysis of a mixture of authentic 13- and 9-hydroperoxide derivatives of linoleic acid (13-HPOD and 9-HPOD) (a), and of the mixture of the reaction catalyzed by the recombinant TdLOX2 (b).
Figure 7. Determination of the positional specificity of the recombinant TdLOX2. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods. SP-HPLC analysis of a mixture of authentic 13- and 9-hydroperoxide derivatives of linoleic acid (13-HPOD and 9-HPOD) (a), and of the mixture of the reaction catalyzed by the recombinant TdLOX2 (b).
Plants 09 01233 g007
Plants 09 01233 g008 550
Figure 8. pH dependence (a) and sensitivity to inhibitors (b) of the TdLOX2 activity. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods using 1 mM Na linoleate as substrate. In (a) the buffers were as follows: 50 mM Na acetate, pH 4.0–5.5; 50 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0; 50 mM Na borate, pH 9.0–11.0. In (b) the assays were carried out at pH 7.2; SHAM, salicylhydroxamic acid; PG, propyl gallate. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Figure 8. pH dependence (a) and sensitivity to inhibitors (b) of the TdLOX2 activity. Measurements were carried out as described in Methods using 1 mM Na linoleate as substrate. In (a) the buffers were as follows: 50 mM Na acetate, pH 4.0–5.5; 50 mM Na phosphate, pH 6.0–8.0; 50 mM Na borate, pH 9.0–11.0. In (b) the assays were carried out at pH 7.2; SHAM, salicylhydroxamic acid; PG, propyl gallate. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Plants 09 01233 g008
Plants 09 01233 g009 550
Figure 9. Effect of 1 mM propyl gallate (PG) on the LOX activity at pH 7.5 (a), the malondialdehyde (MDA) content (b) and the rate of superoxide anion (O2•−) production (c) in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and stress conditions at the 6th DAS. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Figure 9. Effect of 1 mM propyl gallate (PG) on the LOX activity at pH 7.5 (a), the malondialdehyde (MDA) content (b) and the rate of superoxide anion (O2•−) production (c) in the shoots of durum wheat seedlings grown under control, mannitol and stress conditions at the 6th DAS. Vertical bars represent ± S.D. (n = 3 independent experiments).
Plants 09 01233 g009
Table
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of the purified recombinant TdLOX2.
Table 1. Kinetic parameters of the purified recombinant TdLOX2.
SubstrateKm (µM)Vmax (E.U./mg of Protein)
Linoleic acid73.69 ± 7.3335.42 ± 3.16
Linolenic acid300.10 ± 21.367.41 ± 0.95
Arachidonic acid741.00 ± 58.352.45 ± 0.51
Table
Table 2. Primer pairs used to amplify TdLpx and actin1 transcript fragments, annealing temperatures, and PCR product sizes.
Table 2. Primer pairs used to amplify TdLpx and actin1 transcript fragments, annealing temperatures, and PCR product sizes.
Gene FragmentForward Primer (5′→3′)Reverse Primer (5′→3′)Annealing Temperature (°C)Product Size (bp)
TdLpx-B1.1CCAAGATGATACTGGGCGGGCCGCCGCCTTGCCGTGGTTGG621154
TdLpx-B1.2TACACGCCGGTGCCGAGCGGCAGCGTGTCACGCTGCCCGAGGTAGAG72912
TdLpx-A2GACCTGACCACGGCGAAGAGCACCTGCGGGCTCGATGGGTCCTCCACC70425
TdLpx-B2GACCTGACCACCGCGAAGAGCACGTTGTACACCGGGTGGGTCACGCTC68206
TdLpx-A3AATACAGCACGGCGCGAAGAGCACGTTCACCCACCGCTCGATCGCCC70514
TdLpx-B3CCTGCCGCACCCCCAGGGGATGGTTCACCCACCGCTCGATCGCCC70532
Actin1CTTCGGACCCAAGAAAGAAAGCC CACCGCCCGTATTTCTCTAGTAGCC62280

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Menga, V.; Trono, D. The Molecular and Functional Characterization of the Durum Wheat Lipoxygenase TdLOX2 Suggests Its Role in Hyperosmotic Stress Response. Plants 2020, 9, 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091233

AMA Style

Menga V, Trono D. The Molecular and Functional Characterization of the Durum Wheat Lipoxygenase TdLOX2 Suggests Its Role in Hyperosmotic Stress Response. Plants. 2020; 9(9):1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Menga, Valeria, and Daniela Trono. 2020. "The Molecular and Functional Characterization of the Durum Wheat Lipoxygenase TdLOX2 Suggests Its Role in Hyperosmotic Stress Response" Plants 9, no. 9: 1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091233

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop