Abstract
Recently, there have been many proven results of the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality regarding the error bounds for the Chebyshev functional when the functions or their derivatives belong to spaces. In the existing literature, the main assumption in the weight-type results is that the derivative of the function is bounded by two constant functions. The aim of our paper is to extend those results in a way that the derivative of the function is bounded by two functions in spaces. Furthermore, we give some new error estimations of the Chebyshev functional and applications to the one-point weight integral formulas.
MSC:
26D15; 65D30; 65D32
1. Introduction
Throughout this paper, , stands for the space of the functions , which are p-integrable, which means that they are equipped with the p-norm:
which is finite. stands for the space of the functions , which are essentially bounded, i.e., the ∞-norm defined by:
is finite.
Let be the functions such that . The Chebyshev functional is defined by:
Let us recall the Grüss inequality ([]):
Theorem 1.
Let be bounded integrable functions and constants such that:
Then, the following inequality holds:
where the constant is sharp.
The following theorem recalls the well-known Ostrowski inequality, which was established in 1938 []:
Theorem 2.
Let I be an interval in , its interior, and with . If is a differentiable function in satisfying for all and some , then:
for all
Many researchers have established some new results by using the Grüss and Ostrowski inequalities and given applications to the numerical quadrature rules [,,,,,].
Dragomir and Wang [] proved the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality in the following form: If is a differentiable function with a bounded derivative and:
then for , we have:
Matić, Pečarić, and Ujević [] proved the following Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality: Let be n-times differentiable in the interior of I, and let with If is integrable on and:
then for all ,
The remainder is defined by:
For the special case , we have:
for all
Cheng [] proved the following Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality: Let be a differentiable mapping in such that , then for all , we have:
Niezgoda [] established the following result:
Theorem 3.
Let be a function differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that () are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, for , we have the inequality:
where
Kovač and Pečarić [] gave the general weight m-point integral formula:
Theorem 4.
Let be such that is a continuous function of bounded variation on , for some and some integrable weight function. Then, the following identity holds:
Here, are w-harmonic sequences of functions ( for , ):
In the same paper, the authors established the weighted one-point integral formula as a special case:
where is such that is an absolutely continuous function, is a weight function, :
and:
The aim of our paper was to give the generalization of Niezgoda’s result by using the general weight m-point integral formula. Further, we shall give some applications to the one-point integral formula.
2. Main Result
First, let us denote:
and:
Let us consider the Chebyshev functional for functions and :
This section’s objective is to determine the upper bound for (15). We use the following lemma (see []) to prove our main theorem:
Lemma 1.
Let () be a function such that:
Then, we have the inequality:
Now, we are ready to introduce our main result:
Theorem 5.
Let be a function such that is differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that () are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all
Then, the following inequality holds:
where
Proof.
From the identity (15), we have:
Let us apply the Sonin identity (see [], p. 246). For ,
Now, we apply the Hölder inequality to the identity (16) to obtain:
Since is a constant function, we can substitute , and by Lemma 1, we obtain:
which completes the proof. □
Now, we shall consider the special case where and are constant functions.
Corollary 1.
Let be a function such that is differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that such that for all . Then, the following inequality holds:
where
Proof.
Let be conjugate exponents, i.e., . It is obvious that . Substituting functions and with constant functions and in Theorem 5, it is easy to check that Conditions (a) and (b) from Theorem 5 are valid. Consequently, Inequality (16) holds. For , we compute:
and for , we have:
□
Remark 1.
The hypothesis that the n-th derivative of the function is bounded by two constants and is more general than the hypothesis where the n-th derivative is bounded by the functions and . Therefore, if we assume that the conditions from the Theorem 5 and Corollary 1 are satisfied with:
the constant is smaller than the constant for , and , for . Namely, for , we have:
while for , we have:
3. Application to the One-Point Integral Formula
In this section, we shall apply the result from Section 2 to the case , i.e., when we have the one-point integral formula. First, we consider the general weight case and higher-order derivative.
Corollary 2.
Let be a function such that is differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that () are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, the following inequality holds:
where and .
Proof.
We apply Theorem 5 for , , , and to obtain the inequality. □
Now, we shall consider the case of uniform weight function (). For this case, we have:
and:
Corollary 3.
Let be a function such that is differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that () are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, the following inequality holds:
where .
Remark 2.
If we put , , , and in Corollary 3, then we have the assumptions of Theorem 3. In this case:
and Inequality (22) states:
Without loss of generality, we can assume that . Therefore, for , we have , for , we have , and for , we have . Now, for , we have:
For , it is easy to check that:
Therefore, it is shown that our main result is the improvement of Niezgoda’s result mentioned in the Introduction.
Corollary 4.
Let be a differentiable function with a bounded derivative. Suppose that are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function:
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, for we have:
Proof.
The assertion follows if we apply , , and in Corollary 3. □
Remark 3.
If we put constant functions and , then we will obtain:
This is the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality obtained by Dragomir and Wang (3). Therefore, Corollary 4 is the improvement of Dragomir–Wang’s result.
Corollary 5.
Let be a function differentiable on the interior of and let with . Suppose that are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function:
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, the following inequality holds:
Proof.
The assertion follows if we apply , , and in Corollary 3. □
Remark 4.
If we put constant functions and , then we will obtain:
This is the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality obtained by Matić, Pečarić, and Ujević [], so Corollary 5 is the improvement of Matić, Pečarić, and Ujević’s result.
Corollary 6.
Let be a differentiable function in . Suppose that are functions such that :
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, for all , we have:
Proof.
The assertion follows if we apply , , and in Corollary 3. □
Remark 5.
If we put constant functions and , then we will obtain:
This is the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality obtained by Cheng []. Therefore, Corollary 6 is the improvement of Cheng’s result.
Especially, for , we have:
Now, we give the special case of the upper inequality related to the corrected midpoint quadrature formula (corrected in the sense that we have derivatives in endpoints):
Corollary 7.
Let be a function such that is differentiable in the interior of I, and let . Suppose that () are functions such that:
- (a)
- is a constant function;
- (b)
- , for all .
Then, the following inequality holds:
Proof.
We apply Corollary 3 for and . It is easy to calculate and For , we have after some integration:
For , we compute:
For , we have:
and the assertion follows. □
Remark 6.
For and , we obtain the error of the famous midpoint quadrature rule ([]).
4. Conclusions
In this work, we established an improved version of the Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequalities obtained in [,,,]. The main contribution of the work was that the hypothesis that the derivative is bounded by two constant functions is replaced by the more general hypothesis where the derivative of the functions is bounded by two non-constant functions.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.K; methodology, S.K.; software, S.K.; validation, S.K. and A.V.; formal analysis, S.K.; investigation, S.K.; resources, S.K.; data curation, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K.; visualization, S.K.; supervision, S.K.; project administration, S.K.; funding acquisition, S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Grüss, G. Uber das maximum des absoluten betrages von f(x)dxg(x)dx. Math. Z. 1934, 39, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Dragomir, S.S.; Wang, S. An inequality of Ostrowski–Grüss’ type and its applications to estimation of error bounds for some special means and for some numerical quadrature rules. Comput. Math. Appl. 1997, 39, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Matić, M.; Pečarić, J.; Ujević, N. Improvement and further generalization of inequalities of Ostrowski–Grüss-type. Comput. Math. Appl. 2000, 39, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rehman, A.U.; Farid, G. On Chebyshev Functional and Ostrowski–Grus Type Inequalities for Two Coordinates. Int. J. Anal. Appl. 2016, 12, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
- Hussain, S.; Qayyum, Q. A generalized Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality for bounded differentiable mappings and its applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2013, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rafiq, A.; Mir, N.A.; Zafar, F. A generalized Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequality for twice differentiable mappings and applications. J. Inequalities Pure Appl. Math. 2006, 7, 124. [Google Scholar]
- Alomari, M.W. Two-point Ostrowski and Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequalities with applications. J. Anal. 2020, 28, 623–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cheng, X.-L. Improvement of some Ostrowski–Grüss-type inequalities. Comput. Math. Appl. 2001, 42, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niezgoda, M. A new inequality of Ostrowski–Grüss-type and applications to some numerical quadrature rules. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 58, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kovač, S.; Pečarić, J. Weighted version of general integral formula. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 13, 579–599. [Google Scholar]
- Kovač, S.; Pečarić, J.; Vukelić, A. A generalization of general two-point formula with applications in numerical integration. Nonlinear Anal. Theory Methods Appl. 2008, 68, 2445–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).