Abstract
Let be a finite sequence of integers. Then, S is a Gilbreath sequence of length n, , iff is even or odd and are, respectively, odd or even and . This, applied to the order sequence of prime number P, defines Gilbreath polynomials and two integer sequences, A347924 and A347925, which are used to prove that Gilbreath conjecture is implied by , where is the -th Gilbreath polynomial at 1.
MSC:
11A41; 11B83; 11C08
1. Introduction to GC
Let the ordered sequence be formed by prime numbers, and set
where . N. L. Gilbreath conjectured that . It is likely that this conjecture is satisfied by many other sequences of integers, so it is necessary to define the general properties of all sequences that satisfy this conjecture. In particular, H. Croft and others have suggested that any sequence starting with 2 followed by odd numbers which does not increase too fast or too slow (does not have too large gaps) satisfies this conjecture [1]. We equally suggest that the same may be true for any sequence starting with 1 followed by even numbers which does not increase too fast or too slow. Thus, in general, we suggest that any sequence starting with an even or odd number followed by odd or even numbers which does not increase too fast or too slow satisfies this conjecture. In the following sections, we shall call a Gilbreath sequence any sequence that satisfies the Gilbreath conjecture and the upper and lower bounds that satisfy the Gilbreath conjecture for a given sequence.
Let denote the proved for the ordered sequence of the first n prime numbers ; then, there are some interesting computational proofs of . R. B. Killgrove and K. E. Ralston showed in 1959 [2] and A. M. Odlyzko showed in 1993 [3].
2. Properties of Gilbreath Sequence
Definition 1.
Let be a finite sequence of integers and
where ; then, S is called a Gilbreath sequence iff .
For example, let be a sequence of length and Gilbreath triangle of S:
…
Replacing these values gives
1
Let denote the set of all Gilbreath sequences of length n and be the set of all Gilbreath sequences. In the previous example, the first term of every sequence (except for the original sequence S) is equal to 1; then, .
Lemma 1.
Let and be finite sequences of integers; then, .
Proof.
Consider the Gilbreath triangle of S
…
where as a consequence of . Removing the last element of each sequence gives
…
which is a Gilbreath triangle of , as a consequence of ; then, . □
Definition 2.
Let and be finite sequences of integers. Denote with the set of integers k such that .
The Gilbreath triangle of S is
…
where as a consequence of . The Gilbreath triangle of is
…
where as a consequence of . If , then .
Consider the equation
We will refer to Equation (3) as a Gilbreath equation of S. There are values of k that satisfy (3); then, is the set of all solutions for k:
The largest value of k that solves (3) is , and the smallest value is . A remarkable relation is
Lemma 2.
Let be a finite sequence of integers where ; then, .
Proof.
Let , where . From Definition 2, if . Let now the sequence , from Definition 2, if . From the previous step, . Then, and . By induction, this can be proved for every element of S. If and the first element of S is an even number, then all the other numbers of the sequence will be odd. □
Lemma 3.
Let be a finite sequence of integers where ; then .
Proof.
This argument is the same argument as Lemma 2. □
Lemma 4.
Let denote the sets and and let a finite sequence of integers where . Then, .
Proof.
See Lemmas 2 and 3. □
Lemma 5.
Let and be finite sequences of integers where . Then,
Proof.
See Definition 2 and Lemma 4, where the symbol ∧ is used to denote the truth-functional operator of logical conjunction AND [4]. □
An important result regarding Equation (4) follows from Lemma 5. Equation (4) generates solutions for a finite sequence , where . From Lemma 5, these solutions are only even or only odd if is odd or even, respectively. Therefore, the number of distinct solutions generated by (4) is since solutions are divided between even and odd.
Theorem 1.
Let and be finite sequences of integers; then, .
Proof.
Suppose that . Prove the right implication first. From Definition 2, and from Lemma 5, . Then, . Prove the left implication by contradiction. Suppose that but . Then, . The symbol ∨ is used to denote the truth-functional operator of logical disjunction OR [4]. From Definition 2 and Lemma 5, it is not possible to have if . Then, it is true that . □
Corollary 1.
Let be a finite sequence of integers; then, .
Proof.
As a consequence of Definition 2 and Equation (4), each m-th element of a sequence S must be within the range between the upper and the lower sequences calculated on all the elements prior to the m-th ones. From Definition 2 and according to the solution of Gilbreath Equation (4), there cannot exist a Gilbreath sequence in which the m-th element is larger than , since is the maximum value for the m-th element. The same goes for , since it is the smallest value for the m-th element. □
3. Upper and Lower Bound Sequences
Let us now introduce the definition of two notable Gilbreath sequences. Let be a finite sequence of integers; from (4), any solutions of the Gilbreath equation cannot be greater than , so the sequence is the upper bound sequence for S. Let the new sequence now be and its upper bound sequence be , and so on. Equally, let a finite sequence of integers be ; from (4), any value of k cannot be smaller than and the new sequence will have a lower limit for , and so on. Then, it is possible to introduce the definition of the upper bound Gilbreath sequence and the lower bound Gilbreath sequence.
Definition 3.
Let be a finite sequence of integers. Let us denote with the upper bound Gilbreath sequence for S and with the lower bound Gilbreath sequence for S:
The following recursive definition holds:
and
It is also useful to define a notable sub sequence of and .
Definition 4.
Let be a finite sequence of integers and its and . Let us define and as follows:
The following recursive definition holds:
From Theorem 1, and , while elements of and are all even or all odd; then, and .
From Definition 3, let ; then, , , , and . Table 1 shows some examples of Gilbreath sequences and the closed form for .
Table 1.
Some examples of Gilbreath sequences and their closed form for .
4. Gilbreath Polynomials
Definition 5.
Let be the ordered sequence of the first m prime numbers and let be a function such that , where ; then, is called m-th Gilbreath polynomial.
Through simple algebra, one can prove that for the ordered sequence of the first m prime numbers, are represented in Table 2. This provides important information about sequence A347924 [5], which is the triangle read by rows, where row m is the m-th Gilbreath polynomial and column n is the numerator of the coefficient of the k-th degree term. According to Table 2, this sequence contains the integer term of every m-th Gilbreath polynomial. The related sequence A347925 [6] contains the lowest common denominator of m-th Gilbreath polynomial. It is the sequence of denominators of the polynomials in Table 2.
Table 2.
Gilbreath polynomials for .
Relation between Gilbreath Polynomials and
Gilbreath polynomials are closely related to prime numbers and . Let a finite sequence of integers , Theorem 1 and the following. The relationship must be true; otherwise, it would not be true that . As a consequence of Lemma 5, for all elements subsequent to , the absolute difference of two successive elements must be an integer multiple of 2 so as to maintain the absolute difference of two successive elements as an even value. So, if the first element in the sequence is even, the subsequent elements must be odd, and if the first element is odd, the subsequent elements must be even.
Let be a Gilbreath sequence formed by the first two prime numbers. From (5), and from Theorem 1, . By definition of P, . Since , it is certainly true that . The left inequality is proved for and it is easy to prove for every n. The proof of is trivial and holds for all prime numbers, hence . Given Gilbreath polynomials in Definition 5, , then
5. Conclusions and Future Work
Theorem 1, about properties of a Gilbreath sequence, states that if and only if the first element of a finite sequence of integers is even or odd, then for any odd or even integer , respectively, the sequence is .
Theorem 1 proves Equation (6) involving Gilbreath polynomials, and Equation (7) implies . The Gilbreath polynomials defined in Definition 5 introduce a new interesting tool for the study of the properties of prime numbers; in particular, we are interested in the matrix of coefficients of Gilbreath polynomials defined as , and a paper on will be published in the future.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Guy, R. Unsolved Problems in Number Theory; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Killgrove, R.; Ralston, K. On a conjecture concerning the primes. Math. Comput. 1959, 13, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odlyzko, A.M. Iterated Absolute Values of Differences of Consecutive Primes. Math. Comput. 1993, 61, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloni, M. Disjunction. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2023 ed.; Zalta, E.N., Nodelman, U., Eds.; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Gatti, R. Triangle read by rows where row m is the m-th Gilbreath polynomial and column n is the numerator of the coefficient of the n-th degree term. In The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences; OEIS Foundation Inc.: West Trenton, NJ, USA, 2020; Available online: https://oeis.org/A347924 (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Gatti, R. a(n) is the lowest common denominator of n-th Gilbreath polynomial. In The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences; OEIS Foundation Inc.: West Trenton, NJ, USA, 2020; Available online: https://oeis.org/A347925 (accessed on 15 August 2023).
- Rosser, B. Explicit Bounds for Some Functions of Prime Numbers. Am. J. Math. 1941, 63, 211–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosser, B. The n-th Prime is Greater than nlogn. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1939, s2-45, 21–44. Available online: https://londmathsoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1112/plms/s2-45.1.21 (accessed on 15 August 2023). [CrossRef]
- Dusart, P. The kth Prime is Greater than k(lnk + lnlnk − 1) for k ≥ 2. Math. Comput. 1999, 68, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dusart, P. Estimates of some functions over primes without RH. arXiv 2010, arXiv:1002.0442. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).