Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Information Sources Consulted by Doctors at the Point of Care in Four Selected South African Referral Hospitals
Next Article in Special Issue
Capacity Planning of Virtual Wards for Frail and Elderly Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Motion Analysis System for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercises in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Efficiency of Obstetric Services in Germany—The Role of Variation and Overheads

by Steffen Flessa
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 16 November 2023 / Revised: 11 December 2023 / Accepted: 15 December 2023 / Published: 19 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evaluation and Potential of Effective Decision-Making in Healthcare)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The author develops a Monte-Carlo simulation model that analyses the workload of the labour room and the obstetric ward to demonstrate that smaller obstetric departments have disadvantages in comparison to bigger departments.

The simulation model is interesting and suggests that small hospitals cannot break even in this economic model. It gave us some insight into the economies of scale of obstetric departments in these smaller hospitals.

However, the data used for this model consisted mainly of pregnant women who were more than 33 weeks pregnant and whose newborns were delivered vaginally. I have a bit of a question as to whether there is a diagnosis of preterm labor in the delivery of a pregnant woman who is not at full term. In addition, I hope that this model will cover all pregnant women without complications. For pregnant women without complications, they tend to stay in small hospitals for delivery, regardless of the mode of delivery. The inclusion of these people in the model allows for a more comprehensive analysis.

 

Author Response

Please find attached my review in a separate document.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attached review.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please find attached my review in a separate document.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Quick and adequate response to the comments in first round. Congratulations!

Back to TopTop