Next Article in Journal
Hepatitis C Virus Prevalence and Risk Factors in a Village in Northeastern Romania—A Population-Based Screening—The First Step to Viral Micro-Elimination
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Rehabilitation Dose on Nutritional Status at Discharge from a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward in Malnourished Patients with Hip Fracture
Previous Article in Journal
Implications of Lifestyle and Occupational Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer in Shiftwork Nurses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Harnessing Stakeholder Perspectives and Experience to Address Nutrition Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Sarcopenia among the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Healthcare 2021, 9(6), 650; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060650
by Di-Ya Tu 1, Fa-Min Kao 1, Shih-Tzer Tsai 1,2 and Tao-Hsin Tung 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Healthcare 2021, 9(6), 650; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060650
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 25 May 2021 / Accepted: 25 May 2021 / Published: 31 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition Disorders in Older Adults)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of protein intake on prevention and improvement of sarcopenia. 

The work was conducted in a formally correct manner and the (few) studies on the subject were all taken into account. The discussion of the work can be improved. The authors should elaborate on the aspects of the excessive use of protein supplements, the possible damage to health and the ease with which the protein quota required for the prevention of sarcopenia is achieved through diet alone. It is also useful to look at the differences between plant and animal proteins and the risks associated with too much of the latter in the diet.

As the data are very clear, it would also be appropriate to change the title of the review, suggesting the futility of supplementation. 

 

Author Response

Reply to Reviewer 1

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effect of protein intake on prevention and improvement of sarcopenia. 

The work was conducted in a formally correct manner and the (few) studies on the subject were all taken into account. The discussion of the work can be improved. The authors should elaborate on the aspects of the excessive use of protein supplements, the possible damage to health and the ease with which the protein quota required for the prevention of sarcopenia is achieved through diet alone. It is also useful to look at the differences between plant and animal proteins and the risks associated with too much of the latter in the diet.

As the data are very clear, it would also be appropriate to change the title of the review, suggesting the futility of supplementation. 

Ans. Thanks for the reviewer’s useful comments. We apologize for the inadequate descriptions. The descriptions have been corrected.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors:

After review the article, some changes are proposed in order to consider.

King Regards

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Author

Accepted it

 

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop