Next Article in Journal
Polygenic Risk Score Improves Cataract Prediction in East Asian Population
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploiting the Molecular Basis of Oesophageal Cancer for Targeted Therapies and Biomarkers for Drug Response: Guiding Clinical Decision-Making
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Preoperative TSH Serum Level and Thyroid Cancer Occurrence in Patients with AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/biomedicines10081918
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

RNA Modifications in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

by
Xiaoting Zhang
1,2,3,4,
Hao Su
1,2,3,4,
Hongyan Chen
1,2,3,4,
Qing Li
1,2,3,4,
Xiaodong Liu
1,2,3,
Lin Zhang
1,2,3,4,
William Ka Kei Wu
1,2,3,4,
Matthew Tak Vai Chan
1,2,3,* and
Huarong Chen
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Peter Hung Pain Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
2
CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518000, China
3
Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 1918; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081918
Submission received: 9 July 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic and Epigenomic Alterations in Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, referring to cancers of the digestive system such as colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), and liver cancer, is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. A series of genetic, epigenetic, and epitranscriptomic changes occur during the development of GI cancer. The identification of these molecular events provides potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets for cancer patients. RNA modification is required in the posttranscriptional regulation of RNA metabolism, including splicing, intracellular transport, degradation, and translation. RNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and N1-methyladenosine (m1A) are dynamically regulated by three different types of regulators named methyltransferases (writers), RNA binding proteins (readers), and demethylases (erasers). Recent studies have pointed out that abnormal RNA modification contributes to GI tumorigenesis and progression. In this review, we summarize the latest findings on the functional significance of RNA modification in GI cancer and discuss the therapeutic potential of epitranscriptomic inhibitors for cancer treatment.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers refer to malignant conditions of the GI tract and accessory organs of digestion. Globally, GI cancers account for roughly half of all cancer-related deaths [1,2]. Although conventional therapy has been successful to some extent, drug resistance and cancer recurrence are still major obstacles during cancer treatment. Emerging evidence has suggested that abnormal RNA modifications play a pivotal role during the development of GI cancers and may serve as potential therapeutic targets for cancer patients.
The advent of high-throughput sequencing technology allows the high-precision mapping of different types of RNA modifications. Since the discovery of the first RNA nucleoside modification 60 years ago [3], over 170 different types of post-transcriptional modifications have been identified in primary RNA transcripts such as messenger RNAs (mRNAs), ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and transfer RNAs (tRNAs) [4]. RNA modifications have been recognized as crucial regulators of gene expression across time and space in eukaryotic cells. The presence of RNA modifications serves as a key switch on RNA metabolism and remarkably influences the process of RNA splicing, trafficking, stability, and translation efficiency [5,6]. To date, several widespread RNA modifications have been revealed in mammalian RNAs such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) [7,8], N1-methyladenosine (m1A) [9,10], 5-methylcytosine (m5C) [11,12], and N7-methylguanosine (m7G) (Figure 1A,B). Similar to DNA epigenetics and histone modifications, RNA modifications can be installed, removed, and decoded by specific proteins (known as “writers”, “erasers”, and “readers”) (Figure 1C). RNA modifications play an important role in various biological processes. Dysregulated RNA modifications contribute to tumorigenesis and tumor progression through modulating cell differentiation, growth, survival, migration, and chemo-drug resistance [13]. In this review, we describe the functional importance of RNA m6A, m1A, and m7G modifications in GI cancer and discuss their potential role as therapeutic targets for cancer patients.

2. Common Types of Modifications in RNA

2.1. N6-Methyladenosine

N6-methyladenosine (m6A), referring to the methylation of the adenosine base at the nitrogen-6 position, is the most prevalent internal mRNA modification [14]. m6A modification is dynamic and reversible and is involved in almost all processes of mRNA metabolism, including RNA transcription, translation, and degradation [15,16,17]. The enzymes catalyzing the formation of m6A are named as m6A writers, including METTL3, METTL14, and WTAP [18,19]. On the other hand, m6A markers can be removed by m6A erasers such as FTO [20,21,22] and ALKBH5 [23,24]. In addition, m6A can be recognized by a set of RNA-binding proteins called m6A readers that can specifically recognize and bind to m6A-modified transcripts, e.g., YTHDF1/2/3 and YTHDC1/2 (the YTH domain family proteins) [25,26,27,28,29], IGF2BP1/2/3 (the insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins) [30], and hnRNPC/hnRNPG (the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins), leading to the change of RNA metabolism [31,32].

2.2. N1-Methyladenosine

N1-methyladenosine (m1A) refers to the methylation of adenosine at position 1. In human tRNAs, m1A modification is commonly observed at the conserved nucleotide 58 in the TΨC loop, which is critical for tRNA stability [33]. Moreover, a recent study revealed hundreds of m1A sites in human mRNA and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) by mapping m1A at single-nucleotide resolution, although present with low stoichiometry [34]. The occurrence of m1A sites in the 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) or coding sequence (CDS), but not 3′UTR, of mRNA, was found to be associated with translational repression [34], implying that m1A enrichment in mRNA may affect the process of ribosomal scanning. Consistent data were obtained by another research team showing that a large number of m1A modification sites appear in human mRNA [35]. The m1A writers (TRMT10C, Trmt61B, and TRMT6/61A), readers (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, and YTHDC1), and erasers (ALKBH1, ALKBH3) regulate the process of m1A modifications and have a robust role in posttranscriptional regulation of m1A-modified mRNAs and ncRNAs [34,35,36,37]. Trmt61B and TRMT6/61A catalyze m1A at position 58 of mt and cyt tRNA in humans; on the other hand, TRMT10C catalyzes m1A at position 9 [34,37,38]. In addition, ALKBH1 and ALKBH3 demethylate m1A marks in single-stranded (ss) DNA and RNA [39,40]. Moreover, YTH domain-containing proteins, such as YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, and YTHDC1, directly bind to m1A-bearing RNA to trigger the subsequent RNA metabolism process [41].

2.3. N7-Methylguanosine

N7-methylguanosine (m7G) refers to the methylation of guanosine on position N7 of RNA. It is commonly observed in the tRNA variable loop and mRNA 5′ Cap region [42,43]. Extensive m7G tRNA or mRNA methylomes have been identified in mammals [43,44,45,46]. METTL1-WDR4 is the methyltransferase complex that induces m7G modification, leading to the change in RNA metabolism such as mRNA translation [42,43]. Accumulating evidence has pointed out the occurrence of aberrant m7G modification during human disease development, especially in cancer. Dysregulated m7G modification could contribute to tumor formation and progression through regulating the expression of downstream oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes.

2.4. RNA Modification and RNA Metabolism

RNA modification plays an important role in post-transcriptional regulation. It could alter RNA splicing, regulate RNA export, and tune RNA stability and translation via the change of RNA secondary structures, RNA–RNA, and RNA–protein interactions [47,48]. Accumulating evidence suggests that m6A modifications control pre-mRNA processing. The co-localization of m6A regulators such as the m6A writers, METTL3, METTL14, and WTAP, as well as m6A erasers, ALKBH5 and FTO, with splicing factors, has been identified in the nuclear speckles. The occurrence of m6A marks could impact the binding capacity of splicing factors, thereby influencing the alternative splicing of targeted genes [18,49,50]. Conversely, the removal of m6A by S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthesis inhibitors, neplanocin A or cycloleucine, led to the nuclear accumulation of unspliced transcripts [51,52]. Recent work has also pointed out that m6A modifications regulate RNA export. The m6A methyltransferases (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, and KIAA1429) could bind to the TRanscription-Export (TREX) complex which plays a major role in RNA nuclear export [53].
M6A modifications also control RNA stability and translation. YTHDF2 is recognized as a major decay-inducing m6A reader protein through binding to m6A-modified mRNAs and recruiting RNA-degrading enzymes [54,55]. To date, there are two distinct mechanisms of YTHDF2-induced mRNA degradation being reported: the RNase P/MRP-mediated endoribonucleolytic-cleavage pathway and the carbon catabolite repression 4 (CCR4)-negative on TATA-less (NOT)-mediated deadenylation pathway [56]. As to m6A-mediated mRNA translation, different mechanisms have been revealed. The m6A reader YTHDF1 is known to bind to m6A-modified mRNA and recruit the initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3), resulting in increased ribosome occupancy at the mRNA that facilitates translation [27]. It is worth noting that METTL3 could promote mRNA translation in both m6A-dependent and -independent manner [57,58,59,60]. In addition to its role as an m6A writer, METTL3 at 3′UTR near the stop codon could directly interact with eIF3h at the 5′ UTR of the mRNA to form a loop that drives ribosome recycling [60].
RNA m6A modifications are required for DNA damage repair. In response to ultraviolet irradiation, m6A modification was rapidly induced in RNA at DNA damage sites, which was regulated by METTL3 and FTO [61]. Subsequently, m6A RNA recruited Pol κ to DNA damage sites to facilitate repair and cell survival [61]. In agreement, METTL3 and YTHDC1 are reported to regulate the homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) [62]. Upon DSBs, phosphorylated METTL3 induced by ATM (ATM Serine/Threonine Kinase) translocated to DNA damage sites to catalyze m6A modification in RNAs which then recruit YTHDC1 and modulate DNA-RNA hybrids accumulation, resulting in recruitment of RAD51 and BRCA1 for HR-mediated repair [62].
M1A and m7G contain positive electrostatic charge under physiological conditions which could trigger electro-chemical interaction that is critical for tRNA structure and function [63]. M1A modification can disrupt the normal Watson–Crick base pairing of A: T or A: U to form Hoogsteen base pairs [9,10]. This would lead to the change of RNA structure, specific RNA–RNA or RNA–protein interactions, and eventually, RNA stability and mRNA translation [9,10]. Intriguingly, in response to multiple stimuli, m1A modifications display tissue specificity and cellular plasticity in mammals. M7G cap modification is evolutionarily conserved in eukaryotic mRNA. It is present during the early stages of RNA transcription induced by RNA polymerase II (Pol II). The m7G cap could be recognized by Cap Binding Complex (CBC), resulting in altered mRNA transcription, splicing, export, stability, and translation [45].

3. The Role of RNA Modification in GI Cancer

Recent studies have shown that RNA modification is closely associated with the development of gastrointestinal cancer, including liver cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), and gastric cancer (GC). Herein, we summarize the recent findings of RNA modification in gastrointestinal cancer (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

3.1. Liver Cancer

Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer-related death. Epitranscriptomic alterations including RNA modification have been identified in liver cancer which plays an important role in liver cancer development [94,95].
METTL3 was reported to promote liver cancer progression; mechanistically, METTL3 increased SOCS2 mRNA m6A abundance, leading to SOCS2 mRNA degradation, which was mediated by YTHDF2 [64]. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), METTL3 was SUMOylated by a small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO1, which in turn facilitated the oncogenic function of METTL3 [65]. Notably, the SUMOylation of METTL3 could regulate mRNA homeostasis of Snail, a key transcription factor of EMT, in HCC [65]. In line with this study, abundant m6A modification was identified in Snail mRNA by m6A-sequencing [66]. Intriguingly, m6A enrichment in Snail CDS, but not 3′UTR, was associated with increased Snail mRNA translation, which was mediated by YTHDF1 in liver cancer [66]. The knockdown of METTL3 or YTHDF1 attenuated Snail expression and suppressed liver cancer migration and invasion [66]. Moreover, upregulated METTL3 and YTHDF1 expression was found in liver cancer that could serve as adverse prognosis factors for patients [66]. The m6A modifications are also enriched in Circular RNAs (circRNA). Circular cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 6 (circCPSF6) is a newly identified m6A-modified circRNA. The depletion of ALKBH5 increased the m6A level of circCPSF6, leading to YTHDF2-mediated RNA destabilization [68]. Upregulated circCPSF6 expression in HCC promoted tumorigenicity and metastasis [68]. The m6A demethylase FTO expression was overexpressed in HCC, and the high expression of FTO was associated with a poor outcome in HCC patients [67]. Functionally, the depletion of FTO reduced HCC growth both in vitro and in vivo; mechanistically, FTO decreased the m6A abundance of PKM2 mRNA and promoted its expression in HCC [67].
The m6A modifications are also essential for liver cancer stemness. The knockdown of YTHDF2 could significantly inhibit the tumor-initiating ability of CD133+ liver cancer stem cells, while the overexpression of YTHDF2 exerted the opposite effect [69]. Mechanistically, YTHDF2 bound to m6A-modified OCT4 mRNA and increased its translation in liver cancer [69]. The ectopic expression of OCT4 was capable to restore the impaired stemness caused by YTHDF2 depletion, suggesting that YTHDF2 induced m6A-OCT4 to promote liver cancer stemness [69].
The role of m1A modification in liver cancers remains unclear. A recent study reported that RNA m1A level was induced in HCC tumors and liver cancer stem cells (CSCs) compared to adjacent normal tissues and that high m1A content predicted poor HCC patient survival [70]. In this study, the high expression of m1A methyltransferase complex TRMT6/TRMT61A in HCC could elevate the m1A methylation of tRNA, leading to increased PPARδ translation which in turn activated cholesterol synthesis and subsequent Hedgehog signaling, eventually driving liver tumorigenesis [70]. Therefore, TRMT6/TRMT61A-midiated m1A modification is essential for HCC development.
Accumulating evidence indicates an important role of m7G in various human disease development, especially cancer. A higher m7G tRNA modification level, as well as the upregulated expression of METTL1 and WDR4, two m7G methyltransferases, were observed in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) compared to adjacent normal tissues [71]. Both in vitro and in vivo loss- and gain-of-function assays pointed out that METTL1/WDR4 promoted ICC cell survival and progression [71]. Mechanistically, METTL1/WDR4-induced m7G tRNA modification enhanced the mRNA transcription of oncogenes involved in cancer-related pathways such as the cell cycle and EGFR pathways [71]. Consistently, an elevated METTL1/WDR4 expression and an m7G tRNA modification level were identified in HCC compared to adjacent normal tissues, and METTL1/WDR4 exerted an oncogenic role in promoting HCC through m7G tRNA modification-dependent translation [72]. The oncogenic role of WDR4 in HCC was also reported by other research teams revealing that high WDR4 expression promoted HCC cell cycle progression, inhibited cell apoptosis, and increased HCC metastasis and sorafenib resistance [74]. Notably, METTL1 could modulate the immunosuppressive immune microenvironment in HCC. METTL1 expression was capable of inducing an accumulation of PMN-MDSCs which in turn inhibited CD8+ T cell infiltration, thereby facilitating HCC progression after insufficient radiofrequency ablation [73].

3.2. Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality around the world, and the development of CRC is regulated by genetics and epigenetic and epitranscriptomic mechanisms [96]. By integrative m6A sequencing, RNA sequencing, ribosome profiling, RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing, and proteomics, our team has recently identified a novel oncogenic epitranscriptome axis of METTL3-m6A-GLUT1-mTORC1 [75] and YTHDF1-m6A-ARHGEF2 [79] in promoting CRC tumorigenesis. The elevated expression of METTL3 in CRC could increase the m6A level of GLUT1 and promote its mRNA translation, leading to higher glucose uptake and lactate production which subsequently activated mTORC1 signaling [75]. On the other hand, YTHDF1 could directly bind to m6A-modified ARHGEF2 mRNA and enhance its translation, resulting in the subsequent activation of RhoA-signaling that enhanced CRC growth and metastasis [79]. Therefore, m6A modifications play a pivotal role in facilitating CRC tumorigenesis and progression. Intriguingly, Wnt-signaling in intestinal stem cells (ISCs) could induce YTHDF1 expression to promote the translation of TCF7L2/TCF4, inferring a positive feedback loop between YTHDF1-mediated m6A and Wnt signaling that promoted cancer stemness [97]. Consistently, increased YTHDF2 activity induced the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to promote CRC growth [80].
M6A modification is also critical for CRC metastasis. METTL3 can upregulate the m6A level of pri-miR-1246 to promote its maturation, thereby promoting CRC migration and invasion both in vitro and in vivo [76]. Moreover, YTHDC1 could bind to m6A-modified circNSUN2 to facilitate its export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm where cytoplasmic circNSUN2 formed an RNA-protein ternary complex with Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 mRNA-Binding Protein 2 (IGF2BP2), high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) mRNA and RNA-binding protein (RBP), resulting in the enhanced stability of HMGA2 which further promoted CRC liver metastasis [81].
m6A modification could shape the CRC immune microenvironment. We demonstrated that high METTL3 expression in CRC cells induced the m6A-BHLHE41-CXCL1 axis to promote the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the CRC microenvironment, and that the loss of METTL3 in CRC compromised its ability to drive MDSC accumulation and suppressive potency, resulting in enhanced anti-tumor immune responses and diminished CRC growth [77]. In line with our study, a loss of METTL3 or METTL14 in CRC was reported to promote IFN-γ-Stat1-Irf1-signaling in an m6A-dependent manner to regulate anti-tumor immune responses upon anti-PD-1 therapy [78]. Intriguingly, the m6A eraser ALKBH5 displayed similar effects as the m6A writers METTL3 and METTL14. The knockout of ALKBH5 in CRC cells was capable of enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy and prolonged mouse survival by promoting Mct4/Slc16a3 expression and increasing lactate content in the CRC microenvironment, which regulates the accumulation of Treg and MDSCs [82].
To characterize the m1A modifications pattern in CRC, Shi et al., conducted methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing in pairs of human CRCs and adjacent normal tissues [98]. They identified different m1A distribution patterns of lncRNAs between CRC and adjacent tissues and pointed out that unique m1A distribution in CRC was correlated with several cancer pathways [98]. However, further study is warranted to explore the functional importance of m1A in CRC.

3.3. Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most lethal malignancy worldwide [1]. Wang et al., reported that global RNA m6A level was increased in GC tissues compared to paired normal gastric mucosa which was attributed to elevated METTL3 expression [85]. A high METTL3 expression in GC tissues predicted poor prognosis of GC patients, implying that METTL3 is a potential prognostic factor [85]. Mechanistically, METTL3 promoted the m6A modification of HDGF mRNA and enhanced its mRNA stability, which was mediated by m6A reader IGF2BP3, thereby it promoted GC growth [85]. Corroborating its oncogenic function, METTL3 was reported to promote GC proliferation, migration, and invasion by regulating cancer-related pathways [86,99]. Notably, a high METTL3 expression promotes the chemoresistance of GC cells by inducing the m6A modification of ARHGAP5 to stabilize its mRNA expression [87].
Acting as m6A erasers, ALKBH5 and FTO are reported to promote GC tumorigenesis and progression. ALKBH5 demethylated the m6A marks of the lncRNA NEAT1 to promote GC metastasis [88]. On the other hand, FTO was capable of promoting GC growth and metastasis via repressing the m6A modification of caveolin-1 [90]. In this study, reduced m6A level of caveolin-1 mRNA promoted mRNA degradation, leading to the change in mitochondrial fission/fusion and metabolism [90]. FTO could serve as a poor prognostic risk factor for GC patients, and high FTO expression promoted GC cell migration and invasion by enhancing ITGB1 expression via suppressing its m6A level [89].
The m6A reader YTHDF1 was found mutated in around 7% of GC patients, and a high YTHDF1 expression predicted more aggressive GC progression and poor overall survival [92]. YTHDF1 acted as an oncogene in GC, and the depletion of YTHDF1 retarded GC growth both in vitro and in vivo [92]. Mechanistically, YTHDF1 could bind to m6A-modified FZD7 to promote its translation, leading to the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling [92]. Similarly, the m6A reader IGF2BP2 also played an oncogenic role in gastric carcinogenesis by inducing the IGF1R-RhoA-ROCK axis [91]. Our research team recently demonstrated that, in addition to the oncogenic role in GC cells, YTHDF1 could regulate the anti-tumor immune response through the repression of dendritic cells (DCs) [93]. Therefore, YTHDF1 may be a promising therapeutic target for GC treatment.

4. Targeting RNA Modification in Cancer

4.1. Inhibitors of RNA Modification Regulators

The dysregulated expression of m6A regulators as well as abnormal m6A profiles in cancer use epitranscriptomic inhibitors as a promising strategy for cancer treatment. Recently, more and more studies have focused on the development of inhibitors of m6A regulators (Table 4, Figure 2). UZH1a, a potent METTL3 inhibitor, is identified using a structure-based drug discovery approach [100]. UZH1a is selective and cell-permeable and could suppress the m6A methylation level of mRNA in several cell lines [100]. It is worth noting that the inhibitory effect of UZH1a against METTL3 activity is reported to last for at least 6 days [100]. STM2457 is another newly identified METTL3 inhibitor through a high-throughput screen of 250,000 diverse drug-like compounds [77]. STM2457 could selectively bind to the SAM site of METTL3 to suppress m6A catalytic activity with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 16.9 nM [77]. Remarkably, the administration of STM2457 impaired acute myeloid leukemia (AML) growth and prolonged mouse survival in various mouse models of AML [101]. Thus, METTL3 is a new promising target for cancer therapy.
Given the functional significance of FTO in cancer, several FTO inhibitors have been developed. Using a structure-based rational design, two FTO inhibitors, FB23 and FB23-2 (derivatives of meclofenamic acid), have been constructed [103]. FB23 and FB23-2 could directly bind to FTO and suppress FTO-mediated demethylation without affecting ALKBH5 demethylation activity [103]. The administration of FB23 exerted a strong antileukemia effect in in vitro AML cell lines and patient-derived primary leukemia cells models, as well as in vivo patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models [103]. Nevertheless, the IC50 values of FB23 and FB23-2 in suppressing AML are suboptimal: >20 μM and >1 μM for FB23 and FB23-2, respectively [103]. More recently, by a structure-based virtual screening of the 260,000 compounds, two compounds, named CS1 and CS2, were identified that displayed strong inhibitory effects against FTO activity [106]. CS1 and CS2 could strongly suppress AML cell viability with 10- to 30-fold lower IC50 [106]. Meanwhile, Liu et al., optimized FB23 and FB23-2 and developed Dac51 as a more potent FTO inhibitor [104]. Dac51 could strongly inhibit FTO demethylation activity with an IC50 of 0.4 mM [104]. Importantly, the administration of Dac51 was found to promote an anti-tumor T cell response and synergize with anti-PD-L1 treatment in suppressing melanoma [104].
RNA m1A modification is also a potential therapeutic target for cancer. Wang et al., identified thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate (PMA), and thiram as inhibitors against the interaction of TRMT6 and TRMT61A via screening of 1600 known drugs [70]. TRMT61A/TRMT6 complex is responsible to catalyze RNA m1A modifications inside cells. Of these three drugs, the administration of thiram strongly reduced HCC growth in vivo, suggesting that targeting the TRMT6/TRMT61A complex is promising for HCC treatment [70].

4.2. Lipid Nanoparticles for In Vivo siRNA Delivery

The lipid nanoparticle (LNP) is among the most advanced nanocarriers that enable safe and effective siRNA delivery in vivo. LNP technology has been employed for treating various diseases in clinical practice [107,108,109,110]. The LNP delivery system could encapsulate siRNA targeting specific genes, enter cells through endosomes, and release siRNA into the cytoplasm [111]. For the successful delivery of nucleic acid into livers, LNPs are bound to ApoE protein which recognizes LDLR, a highly expressed receptor in hepatocytes [112,113]. Our team has recently utilized this platform to deliver siRNA targeting m6A-modified ARHGEF2 in mice CRC xenograft models. The results demonstrated that LNP-siARHGEF2 significantly suppressed tumor growth and metastasis in vivo, implying the therapeutic potential of LNP-siRNA for cancer patients [79]. However, the safety and efficacy of the LNP-siRNA targeting regulators of RNA modification for treating cancer should be further explored.

4.3. Targeting RNA Modification in Combination with Current Cancer Treatment

Resistance in therapy is a major challenge to the treatment of cancer patients. RNA modifications play a critical role in cancer development, providing novel insights into how to overcome treatment resistance. Moreover, the detection of RNA modification may serve as an indicator for individualized cancer treatment.
Dysregulated m6A modifications have been reported to regulate cancer chemotherapy resistance. A recent study revealed that the knockdown of FTO, an m6A eraser, could enhance the stem-like properties and chemo-resistance of CRC [83]. Intriguingly, the low expression of FTO in CRC was reported to promote acquired drug resistance through its N6,2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am) demethylase activity [83]. Other m6A regulators have also been reported to influence the chemo-resistance of cancer. YTHDF3, an m6A eraser, was highly expressed in oxaliplatin-resistant CRC [114]. YTHDF3 could bind to eIF3A and form a complex to increase eIF2AK2 mRNA translation, leading to CRC chemotherapy resistance [114]. Another m6A reader IGF2BP3 could also increase CRC chemoresistance [115]. IGF2BP3 was reported to bind to m6A-modified ABCB1 mRNA, leading to enhanced mRNA stability, and high ABCB1 expression subsequently triggered the multidrug resistance of CRC [115]. Together, targeting m6A regulators may become of great utility to overcoming cancer chemotherapy resistance.
Targeting m6A regulators has shed new light to improve the effectiveness of cancer immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Our recent study demonstrated that the targeting of METTL3 by METTL3-sgRNA or chemical METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 could potentiate the effect of anti-PD1 treatment in different mouse CRC syngeneic models [77]. Mechanistically, the targeting of METTL3 suppressed MDSC infiltration in a CRC microenvironment, which unleashed an anti-PD1-mediated CD8+ T cell antitumor response [77]. In line with our findings, Wang et al., reported that CRC cells with METTL3 or METTL14 knockout were more sensitive to anti-PD-1 treatment [78]. Therefore, METTL3 is a potential therapeutic target for combination therapy with ICI for CRC treatment.
Intriguingly, targeting m6A erasers ALKBH5 or FTO has also shown beneficial effects to enhance ICI efficacy for cancer treatment. By the in silico screening of a library of synthesized compounds, Li et al., identified a specific inhibitor of ALKBH5, named ALK-04 [82]. They demonstrated that the administration of ALK-04 strongly increased the efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy response and prolonged the survival of mice bearing CRC allografts [82]. On the other hand, the knockdown of FTO was found to increase the sensitivity of melanoma cells to anti-PD-1 treatment in mice through the modulation of adaptive immunity [116]. Taken together, targeting m6A regulators could impact the ICI efficacy for CRC treatment.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

RNA modifications have expanded our understanding of molecular mechanisms in GI cancer. However, there are many questions to be elucidated: (1) the change of RNA modifications at different stages of GI cancer development is still unclear; (2) the occurrence of RNA modifications among different types of RNA (mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, and lncRNA), or their positions among different regions of transcripts (5′UTR, CDS, and 3′UTR) shows the remarkable impact on the subsequent RNA metabolism, which should be further explored; (3) both oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions of RNA modification regulators (e.g., METTL3) have been reported in cancer, reflecting their multifaceted roles during cancer development. This is partially contributed by the abundance of target transcripts while more evidence is required to address this issue; (4) the binding of different RNA modification readers could result in opposite outcomes. For example, YTHDF2 facilitates RNA degradation while IGF2BP1-3 stabilizes m6A-modified mRNAs. The discrepant results need to be justified; (5) the crosstalk or competition among different types of RNA modifications is largely unknown; (6) whether the detection of epitranscriptomic change could predict the treatment response of GI patients should be studied; and (7) although epitranscriptomic drugs have shown potential to promote the efficacy of chemotherapy or immunotherapy in preclinical studies, clinical trials should be designed and conducted in future. Overall, the complexity of epitranscriptome in GI cancer should be further studied, which will provide a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with GI cancer.

Author Contributions

X.Z. wrote the manuscript. H.C. (Huarong Chen) and M.T.V.C. supervised the study and revised the paper. H.S., H.C. (Hongyan Chen), Q.L., X.L., L.Z. and W.K.K.W. assisted in editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the Heath and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) (18190951); RGC-GRF Hong Kong (14107321); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; 82103245, 81972576); and the CUHK Direct Grant for Research (2020.006, 2021.004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rahib, L.; Smith, B.D.; Aizenberg, R.; Rosenzweig, A.B.; Fleshman, J.M.; Matrisian, L.M. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 2913–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Davis, F.F.; Allen, F.W. Ribonucleic Acids From Yeast Which Contain a Fifth Nucleotide. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 227, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boccaletto, P.; Stefaniak, F.; Ray, A.; Cappannini, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Purta, E.; Kurkowska, M.; Shirvanizadeh, N.; Destefanis, E.; Groza, P.; et al. MODOMICS: A database of RNA modification pathways. 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D231–D235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kadumuri, R.V.; Janga, S.C. Epitranscriptomic Code and Its Alterations in Human Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2018, 24, 886–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, B.S.; Roundtree, I.A.; He, C. Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dominissini, D.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Schwartz, S.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Ungar, L.; Osenberg, S.; Cesarkas, K.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Amariglio, N.; Kupiec, M.; et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012, 485, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meyer, K.D.; Saletore, Y.; Zumbo, P.; Elemento, O.; Mason, C.E.; Jaffrey, S.R. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3’ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149, 1635–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dominissini, D.; Nachtergaele, S.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Peer, E.; Kol, N.; Ben-Haim, M.S.; Dai, Q.; Di Segni, A.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Clark, W.C.; et al. The dynamic N(1)-methyladenosine methylome in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature 2016, 530, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, X.; Xiong, X.; Wang, K.; Wang, L.; Shu, X.; Ma, S.; Yi, C. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals reversible and dynamic N(1)-methyladenosine methylome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Squires, J.E.; Patel, H.R.; Nousch, M.; Sibbritt, T.; Humphreys, D.T.; Parker, B.J.; Suter, C.M.; Preiss, T. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 5023–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sun, Z.; Xue, S.; Zhang, M.; Xu, H.; Hu, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Guo, M.; Cui, H. Aberrant NSUN2-mediated m(5)C modification of H19 lncRNA is associated with poor differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2020, 39, 6906–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Delaunay, S.; Frye, M. RNA modifications regulating cell fate in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dubin, D.T.; Taylor, R.H. The methylation state of poly A-containing messenger RNA from cultured hamster cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1975, 2, 1653–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roundtree, I.A.; Evans, M.E.; Pan, T.; He, C. Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. Cell 2017, 169, 1187–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nachtergaele, S.; He, C. Chemical Modifications in the Life of an mRNA Transcript. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2018, 52, 349–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, W.; Qi, X.; Liu, L.; Ma, S.; Liu, J.; Wu, J. Epigenetic Regulation of m(6)A Modifications in Human Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 19, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ping, X.L.; Sun, B.F.; Wang, L.; Xiao, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, W.J.; Adhikari, S.; Shi, Y.; Lv, Y.; Chen, Y.S.; et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, J.; Yue, Y.; Han, D.; Wang, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jia, G.; Yu, M.; Lu, Z.; Deng, X.; et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mauer, J.; Sindelar, M.; Despic, V.; Guez, T.; Hawley, B.R.; Vasseur, J.J.; Rentmeister, A.; Gross, S.S.; Pellizzoni, L.; Debart, F.; et al. FTO controls reversible m(6)Am RNA methylation during snRNA biogenesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wei, J.; Liu, F.; Lu, Z.; Fei, Q.; Ai, Y.; He, P.C.; Shi, H.; Cui, X.; Su, R.; Klungland, A.; et al. Differential m(6)A, m(6)Am, and m(1)A Demethylation Mediated by FTO in the Cell Nucleus and Cytoplasm. Mol. Cell 2018, 71, 973–985.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Bartosovic, M.; Molares, H.C.; Gregorova, P.; Hrossova, D.; Kudla, G.; Vanacova, S. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO targets pre-mRNAs and regulates alternative splicing and 3’-end processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 11356–11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, C.; Liu, K.; Tempel, W.; Demetriades, M.; Aik, W.; Schofield, C.J.; Min, J. Structures of human ALKBH5 demethylase reveal a unique binding mode for specific single-stranded N6-methyladenosine RNA demethylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17299–17311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Feng, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, W.; Tong, Y.; Cheng, C.; Chen, Z. Crystal structures of the human RNA demethylase Alkbh5 reveal basis for substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 11571–11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Shi, H.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, B.S.; Ma, H.; Hsu, P.J.; Liu, C.; He, C. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N(6)-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Li, A.; Chen, Y.S.; Ping, X.L.; Yang, X.; Xiao, W.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.Y.; Zhu, Q.; Baidya, P.; Wang, X.; et al. Cytoplasmic m(6)A reader YTHDF3 promotes mRNA translation. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, X.; Zhao, B.S.; Roundtree, I.A.; Lu, Z.; Han, D.; Ma, H.; Weng, X.; Chen, K.; Shi, H.; He, C. N(6)-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell 2015, 161, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, K.; Roundtree, I.A.; Tempel, W.; Li, Y.; Lu, Z.; He, C.; Min, J. Structural basis for selective binding of m6A RNA by the YTHDC1 YTH domain. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 927–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Lu, Z.; Gomez, A.; Hon, G.C.; Yue, Y.; Han, D.; Fu, Y.; Parisien, M.; Dai, Q.; Jia, G.; et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature 2014, 505, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, H.; Weng, H.; Sun, W.; Qin, X.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; Zhao, B.S.; Mesquita, A.; Liu, C.; Yuan, C.L.; et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zaccara, S.; Ries, R.J.; Jaffrey, S.R. Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 608–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, Y.; Hsu, P.J.; Chen, Y.S.; Yang, Y.G. Dynamic transcriptomic m(6)A decoration: Writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Saikia, M.; Fu, Y.; Pavon-Eternod, M.; He, C.; Pan, T. Genome-wide analysis of N1-methyl-adenosine modification in human tRNAs. RNA 2010, 16, 1317–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Safra, M.; Sas-Chen, A.; Nir, R.; Winkler, R.; Nachshon, A.; Bar-Yaacov, D.; Erlacher, M.; Rossmanith, W.; Stern-Ginossar, N.; Schwartz, S. The m1A landscape on cytosolic and mitochondrial mRNA at single-base resolution. Nature 2017, 551, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, H.; Rauch, S.; Dai, Q.; Cui, X.; Zhang, Z.; Nachtergaele, S.; Sepich, C.; He, C.; Dickinson, B.C. Evolution of a reverse transcriptase to map N(1)-methyladenosine in human messenger RNA. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, Z.; Qi, M.; Shen, B.; Luo, G.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Dai, Q.; Wang, H. Transfer RNA demethylase ALKBH3 promotes cancer progression via induction of tRNA-derived small RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chujo, T.; Suzuki, T. Trmt61B is a methyltransferase responsible for 1-methyladenosine at position 58 of human mitochondrial tRNAs. RNA 2012, 18, 2269–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Vilardo, E.; Rossmanith, W. Molecular insights into HSD10 disease: Impact of SDR5C1 mutations on the human mitochondrial RNase P complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 5112–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Duncan, T.; Trewick, S.C.; Koivisto, P.; Bates, P.A.; Lindahl, T.; Sedgwick, B. Reversal of DNA alkylation damage by two human dioxygenases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 16660–16665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Trewick, S.C.; Henshaw, T.F.; Hausinger, R.P.; Lindahl, T.; Sedgwick, B. Oxidative demethylation by Escherichia coli AlkB directly reverts DNA base damage. Nature 2002, 419, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, X.; Wang, T.; Gonzalez, G.; Wang, Y. Identification of YTH Domain-Containing Proteins as the Readers for N1-Methyladenosine in RNA. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 6380–6384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alexandrov, A.; Grayhack, E.J.; Phizicky, E.M. tRNA m7G methyltransferase Trm8p/Trm82p: Evidence linking activity to a growth phenotype and implicating Trm82p in maintaining levels of active Trm8p. RNA 2005, 11, 821–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lin, S.; Liu, Q.; Lelyveld, V.S.; Choe, J.; Szostak, J.W.; Gregory, R.I. Mettl1/Wdr4-Mediated m(7)G tRNA Methylome Is Required for Normal mRNA Translation and Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Differentiation. Mol. Cell 2018, 71, 244–255.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Enroth, C.; Poulsen, L.D.; Iversen, S.; Kirpekar, F.; Albrechtsen, A.; Vinther, J. Detection of internal N7-methylguanosine (m7G) RNA modifications by mutational profiling sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, e126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Malbec, L.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, B.F.; Shi, B.Y.; Zhao, Y.L.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.G. Dynamic methylome of internal mRNA N(7)-methylguanosine and its regulatory role in translation. Cell Res. 2019, 29, 927–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, L.S.; Liu, C.; Ma, H.; Dai, Q.; Sun, H.L.; Luo, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Hu, L.; Dong, X.; et al. Transcriptome-wide Mapping of Internal N(7)-Methylguanosine Methylome in Mammalian mRNA. Mol. Cell 2019, 74, 1304–1316.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Roost, C.; Lynch, S.R.; Batista, P.J.; Qu, K.; Chang, H.Y.; Kool, E.T. Structure and thermodynamics of N6-methyladenosine in RNA: A spring-loaded base modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2107–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Spitale, R.C.; Flynn, R.A.; Zhang, Q.C.; Crisalli, P.; Lee, B.; Jung, J.W.; Kuchelmeister, H.Y.; Batista, P.J.; Torre, E.A.; Kool, E.T.; et al. Structural imprints in vivo decode RNA regulatory mechanisms. Nature 2015, 519, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zheng, G.; Dahl, J.A.; Niu, Y.; Fedorcsak, P.; Huang, C.M.; Li, C.J.; Vagbo, C.B.; Shi, Y.; Wang, W.L.; Song, S.H.; et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhao, X.; Yang, Y.; Sun, B.F.; Shi, Y.; Yang, X.; Xiao, W.; Hao, Y.J.; Ping, X.L.; Chen, Y.S.; Wang, W.J.; et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 1403–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carroll, S.M.; Narayan, P.; Rottman, F.M. N6-methyladenosine residues in an intron-specific region of prolactin pre-mRNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 1990, 10, 4456–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stoltzfus, C.M.; Dane, R.W. Accumulation of spliced avian retrovirus mRNA is inhibited in S-adenosylmethionine-depleted chicken embryo fibroblasts. J. Virol. 1982, 42, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lesbirel, S.; Viphakone, N.; Parker, M.; Parker, J.; Heath, C.; Sudbery, I.; Wilson, S.A. The m(6)A-methylase complex recruits TREX and regulates mRNA export. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Park, O.H.; Ha, H.; Lee, Y.; Boo, S.H.; Kwon, D.H.; Song, H.K.; Kim, Y.K. Endoribonucleolytic Cleavage of m(6)A-Containing RNAs by RNase P/MRP Complex. Mol. Cell 2019, 74, 494–507.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Du, H.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xi, H.; Liu, M.; Ma, J.; Wu, L. YTHDF2 destabilizes m(6)A-containing RNA through direct recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, Y.; Choe, J.; Park, O.H.; Kim, Y.K. Molecular Mechanisms Driving mRNA Degradation by m(6)A Modification. Trends Genet. 2020, 36, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lin, S.; Choe, J.; Du, P.; Triboulet, R.; Gregory, R.I. The m(6)A Methyltransferase METTL3 Promotes Translation in Human Cancer Cells. Mol. Cell 2016, 62, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Barbieri, I.; Tzelepis, K.; Pandolfini, L.; Shi, J.; Millan-Zambrano, G.; Robson, S.C.; Aspris, D.; Migliori, V.; Bannister, A.J.; Han, N.; et al. Promoter-bound METTL3 maintains myeloid leukaemia by m(6)A-dependent translation control. Nature 2017, 552, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vu, L.P.; Pickering, B.F.; Cheng, Y.; Zaccara, S.; Nguyen, D.; Minuesa, G.; Chou, T.; Chow, A.; Saletore, Y.; MacKay, M.; et al. The N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A)-forming enzyme METTL3 controls myeloid differentiation of normal hematopoietic and leukemia cells. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Choe, J.; Lin, S.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, L.; Ramirez-Moya, J.; Du, P.; Kim, W.; Tang, S.; Sliz, P.; et al. mRNA circularization by METTL3-eIF3h enhances translation and promotes oncogenesis. Nature 2018, 561, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Xiang, Y.; Laurent, B.; Hsu, C.H.; Nachtergaele, S.; Lu, Z.; Sheng, W.; Xu, C.; Chen, H.; Ouyang, J.; Wang, S.; et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response. Nature 2017, 543, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Peng, D.; Jiang, A.; He, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, C.; Zhou, H.; Luo, X.; Liu, H.; et al. METTL3 and N6-Methyladenosine Promote Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair of DSBs by Modulating DNA-RNA Hybrid Accumulation. Mol. Cell 2020, 79, 425–442.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, C.; Jia, G. Reversible RNA Modification N(1)-methyladenosine (m(1)A) in mRNA and tRNA. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2018, 16, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, M.; Wei, L.; Law, C.T.; Tsang, F.H.; Shen, J.; Cheng, C.L.; Tsang, L.H.; Ho, D.W.; Chiu, D.K.; Lee, J.M.; et al. RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase-like 3 promotes liver cancer progression through YTHDF2-dependent posttranscriptional silencing of SOCS2. Hepatology 2018, 67, 2254–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, W.; Fu, S.; Li, Y.; Ni, W.; Xin, Y.; Li, W.; Yang, C.; Bai, Y.; et al. SUMO1 modification of methyltransferase-like 3 promotes tumor progression via regulating Snail mRNA homeostasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics 2020, 10, 5671–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lin, X.; Chai, G.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Luo, G.; Tauler, J.; Du, J.; Lin, S.; et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of Snail. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, J.; Zhu, L.; Shi, Y.; Liu, J.; Lin, L.; Chen, X. m6A demethylase FTO promotes hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis via mediating PKM2 demethylation. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 6084–6092. [Google Scholar]
  68. Chen, Y.; Ling, Z.; Cai, X.; Xu, Y.; Lv, Z.; Man, D.; Ge, J.; Yu, C.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Activation of YAP1 by N6-Methyladenosine-Modified circCPSF6 Drives Malignancy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2022, 82, 599–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, C.; Huang, S.; Zhuang, H.; Ruan, S.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, K.; Ji, F.; Ma, Z.; Hou, B.; He, X. YTHDF2 promotes the liver cancer stem cell phenotype and cancer metastasis by regulating OCT4 expression via m6A RNA methylation. Oncogene 2020, 39, 4507–4518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Xiong, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, X.; Gu, Y.; Dominissini, D.; He, L.; et al. N(1)-methyladenosine methylation in tRNA drives liver tumourigenesis by regulating cholesterol metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dai, Z.; Liu, H.; Liao, J.; Huang, C.; Ren, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhu, S.; Peng, B.; Li, S.; Lai, J.; et al. N(7)-Methylguanosine tRNA modification enhances oncogenic mRNA translation and promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3339–3355.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, Z.; Zhu, W.; Zhu, S.; Sun, K.; Liao, J.; Liu, H.; Dai, Z.; Han, H.; Ren, X.; Yang, Q.; et al. METTL1 promotes hepatocarcinogenesis via m(7) G tRNA modification-dependent translation control. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zeng, X.; Liao, G.; Li, S.; Liu, H.; Zhao, X.; Li, S.; Lei, K.; Zhu, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Eliminating METTL1-mediated accumulation of PMN-MDSCs prevents HCC recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Hepatology 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xia, P.; Zhang, H.; Xu, K.; Jiang, X.; Gao, M.; Wang, G.; Liu, Y.; Yao, Y.; Chen, X.; Ma, W.; et al. MYC-targeted WDR4 promotes proliferation, metastasis, and sorafenib resistance by inducing CCNB1 translation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, H.; Gao, S.; Liu, W.; Wong, C.C.; Wu, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, D.; Gou, H.; Kang, W.; Zhai, J.; et al. RNA N(6)-Methyladenosine Methyltransferase METTL3 Facilitates Colorectal Cancer by Activating the m(6)A-GLUT1-mTORC1 Axis and Is a Therapeutic Target. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 1284–1300.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Peng, W.; Li, J.; Chen, R.; Gu, Q.; Yang, P.; Qian, W.; Ji, D.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, J.; et al. Upregulated METTL3 promotes metastasis of colorectal Cancer via miR-1246/SPRED2/MAPK signaling pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Chen, H.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Liang, C.; Wong, C.-C.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, D.; Liu, W.; Zhai, J.; Gou, H.; et al. METTL3 inhibits anti-tumor immunity by targeting m6A-BHLHE41-CXCL1/CXCR2 axis to promote colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Hui, H.; Agrawal, K.; Kang, Y.; Li, N.; Tang, R.; Yuan, J.; Rana, T.M. m(6) A RNA methyltransferases METTL3/14 regulate immune responses to anti-PD-1 therapy. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e104514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, S.; Gao, S.; Zeng, Y.; Zhu, L.; Mo, Y.; Wong, C.C.; Bao, Y.; Su, P.; Zhai, J.; Wang, L.; et al. N6-Methyladenosine Reader YTHDF1 Promotes ARHGEF2 Translation and RhoA Signaling in Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 1183–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, H.; Zhang, N.; Jiao, X.; Wang, C.; Sun, W.; He, Y.; Ren, G.; Huang, S.; Li, M.; Chang, Y.; et al. Downregulation of microRNA-6125 promotes colorectal cancer growth through YTHDF2-dependent recognition of N6-methyladenosine-modified GSK3beta. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021, 11, e602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, R.X.; Chen, X.; Xia, L.P.; Zhang, J.X.; Pan, Z.Z.; Ma, X.D.; Han, K.; Chen, J.W.; Judde, J.G.; Deas, O.; et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modification of circNSUN2 facilitates cytoplasmic export and stabilizes HMGA2 to promote colorectal liver metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Li, N.; Kang, Y.; Wang, L.; Huff, S.; Tang, R.; Hui, H.; Agrawal, K.; Gonzalez, G.M.; Wang, Y.; Patel, S.P.; et al. ALKBH5 regulates anti-PD-1 therapy response by modulating lactate and suppressive immune cell accumulation in tumor microenvironment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 20159–20170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Relier, S.; Ripoll, J.; Guillorit, H.; Amalric, A.; Achour, C.; Boissiere, F.; Vialaret, J.; Attina, A.; Debart, F.; Choquet, A.; et al. FTO-mediated cytoplasmic m(6)Am demethylation adjusts stem-like properties in colorectal cancer cell. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yue, C.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Li, L.; Chen, J.; Guo, Y. microRNA-96 promotes occurrence and progression of colorectal cancer via regulation of the AMPKalpha2-FTO-m6A/MYC axis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, Q.; Chen, C.; Ding, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, G.; Zhang, J.; et al. METTL3-mediated m(6)A modification of HDGF mRNA promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic significance. Gut 2020, 69, 1193–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liu, T.; Yang, S.; Sui, J.; Xu, S.Y.; Cheng, Y.P.; Shen, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.M.; Yin, L.H.; Pu, Y.P.; et al. Dysregulated N6-methyladenosine methylation writer METTL3 contributes to the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2020, 235, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Han, S.; Chen, M.; Song, P.; Dai, D.; Xu, W.; Jiang, T.; Feng, L.; Shin, V.Y.; et al. Impaired autophagic degradation of lncRNA ARHGAP5-AS1 promotes chemoresistance in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, J.; Guo, S.; Piao, H.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Meng, X.Y.; Yang, D.; Zheng, Z.C.; Zhao, Y. ALKBH5 promotes invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by decreasing methylation of the lncRNA NEAT1. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 75, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Wang, D.; Qu, X.; Lu, W.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Hou, K.; Yang, B.; Li, C.; Qi, J.; Xiao, J.; et al. N(6)-Methyladenosine RNA Demethylase FTO Promotes Gastric Cancer Metastasis by Down-Regulating the m6A Methylation of ITGB1. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 681280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Deng, H.; Xu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zheng, X.; Jiang, J. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO promotes growth and metastasis of gastric cancer via m(6)A modification of caveolin-1 and metabolic regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liu, D.; Xia, A.D.; Wu, L.P.; Li, S.; Zhang, K.; Chen, D. IGF2BP2 promotes gastric cancer progression by regulating the IGF1R-RhoA-ROCK signaling pathway. Cell. Signal. 2022, 94, 110313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Pi, J.; Wang, W.; Ji, M.; Wang, X.; Wei, X.; Jin, J.; Liu, T.; Qiang, J.; Qi, Z.; Li, F.; et al. YTHDF1 Promotes Gastric Carcinogenesis by Controlling Translation of FZD7. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 2651–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bai, X.; Wong, C.C.; Pan, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, W.; Zhai, J.; Kang, W.; Shi, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Tsukamoto, T.; et al. Loss of YTHDF1 in gastric tumors restores sensitivity to antitumor immunity by recruiting mature dendritic cells. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e003663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Giaquinto, A.N.; Miller, K.D.; Tossas, K.Y.; Winn, R.A.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 202–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Meacham, C.E.; Morrison, S.J. Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 2013, 501, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Fearon, E.R. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2011, 6, 479–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Han, B.; Yan, S.; Wei, S.; Xiang, J.; Liu, K.; Chen, Z.; Bai, R.; Sheng, J.; Xu, Z.; Gao, X. YTHDF1-mediated translation amplifies Wnt-driven intestinal stemness. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e49229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shi, L.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Xue, M. N1-methyladenosine profiling of long non-coding RNA in colorectal cancer. IUBMB Life 2021, 73, 1235–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Huo, F.C.; Zhu, Z.M.; Zhu, W.T.; Du, Q.Y.; Liang, J.; Mou, J. METTL3-mediated m(6)A methylation of SPHK2 promotes gastric cancer progression by targeting KLF2. Oncogene 2021, 40, 2968–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Moroz-Omori, E.V.; Huang, D.; Bedi, R.K.; Cheriyamkunnel, S.J.; Bochenkova, E.; Dolbois, A.; Rzeczkowski, M.D.; Li, Y.; Wiedmer, L.; Caflisch, A. METTL3 inhibitors for epitranscriptomic modulation of cellular processes. ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 3035–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yankova, E.; Blackaby, W.; Albertella, M.; Rak, J.; De Braekeleer, E.; Tsagkogeorga, G.; Pilka, E.S.; Aspris, D.; Leggate, D.; Hendrick, A.G.; et al. Small-molecule inhibition of METTL3 as a strategy against myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2021, 593, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Xu, W.; Xie, S.; Chen, X.; Pan, S.; Qian, H.; Zhu, X. Effects of Quercetin on the Efficacy of Various Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Cervical Cancer Cells. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2021, 15, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Huang, Y.; Su, R.; Sheng, Y.; Dong, L.; Dong, Z.; Xu, H.; Ni, T.; Zhang, Z.S.; Zhang, T.; Li, C.; et al. Small-Molecule Targeting of Oncogenic FTO Demethylase in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Cell 2019, 35, 677–691.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Liu, Y.; Liang, G.; Xu, H.; Dong, W.; Dong, Z.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Li, F.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Tumors exploit FTO-mediated regulation of glycolytic metabolism to evade immune surveillance. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 1221–1233.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Huff, S.; Tiwari, S.K.; Gonzalez, G.M.; Wang, Y.; Rana, T.M. m(6)A-RNA Demethylase FTO Inhibitors Impair Self-Renewal in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Su, R.; Dong, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, M.; Han, L.; Wunderlich, M.; Deng, X.; Li, H.; Huang, Y.; Gao, L.; et al. Targeting FTO Suppresses Cancer Stem Cell Maintenance and Immune Evasion. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 79–96.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Walsh, C.; Ou, K.; Belliveau, N.M.; Leaver, T.J.; Wild, A.W.; Huft, J.; Lin, P.J.; Chen, S.; Leung, A.K.; Lee, J.B.; et al. Microfluidic-based manufacture of siRNA-lipid nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1141, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zuckerman, J.E.; Davis, M.E. Clinical experiences with systemically administered siRNA-based therapeutics in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Coelho, T.; Adams, D.; Silva, A.; Lozeron, P.; Hawkins, P.N.; Mant, T.; Perez, J.; Chiesa, J.; Warrington, S.; Tranter, E.; et al. Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fitzgerald, K.; Frank-Kamenetsky, M.; Shulga-Morskaya, S.; Liebow, A.; Bettencourt, B.R.; Sutherland, J.E.; Hutabarat, R.M.; Clausen, V.A.; Karsten, V.; Cehelsky, J.; et al. Effect of an RNA interference drug on the synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and the concentration of serum LDL cholesterol in healthy volunteers: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Allen, T.M.; Cullis, P.R. Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Suzuki, Y.; Ishihara, H. Structure, activity and uptake mechanism of siRNA-lipid nanoparticles with an asymmetric ionizable lipid. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 510, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Suzuki, Y.; Hyodo, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Ishihara, H. siRNA-lipid nanoparticles with long-term storage stability facilitate potent gene-silencing in vivo. J. Control. Release 2015, 220, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, D.; Quan, Q.; Ge, Y.; Li, L.; Guo, L. YTHDF3 Facilitates eIF2AK2 and eIF3A Recruitment on mRNAs to Regulate Translational Processes in Oxaliplatin-Resistant Colorectal Cancer. ACS Chem. Biol. 2022, 17, 1778–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Yang, Z.; Zhao, F.; Gu, X.; Feng, L.; Xu, M.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X. Binding of RNA m6A by IGF2BP3 triggers chemoresistance of HCT8 cells via upregulation of ABCB1. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 1428–1445. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Yang, S.; Wei, J.; Cui, Y.H.; Park, G.; Shah, P.; Deng, Y.; Aplin, A.E.; Lu, Z.; Hwang, S.; He, C.; et al. m(6)A mRNA demethylase FTO regulates melanoma tumorigenicity and response to anti-PD-1 blockade. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 10 01918 g001 550
Figure 1. Different types of RNA modifications and their distribution. (A) RNA modifications within mRNA. (B) RNA modifications in tRNA. (C) Regulators of RNA modifications.
Figure 1. Different types of RNA modifications and their distribution. (A) RNA modifications within mRNA. (B) RNA modifications in tRNA. (C) Regulators of RNA modifications.
Biomedicines 10 01918 g001
Biomedicines 10 01918 g002 550
Figure 2. Approaches to target RNA modifications: LNP-siRNA or specific small molecular inhibitors targeting RNA modification regulators.
Figure 2. Approaches to target RNA modifications: LNP-siRNA or specific small molecular inhibitors targeting RNA modification regulators.
Biomedicines 10 01918 g002
Table
Table 1. RNA modification and liver cancer.
Table 1. RNA modification and liver cancer.
EnzymeExpressionTargetsMolecular MechanismRef
METTL3HighSOCS2Silences SOCS2 by YTHDF2[64]
METTL3HighsnailSUMO1 modification of
METTL3 promotes tumor progression		[65]
METTL3HighsnailEMT transition[66]
FTOHighPKM2Promote the proliferation and tumor growth[67]
YTHDF2LowcircCPSF6Trigger circCPSF6 recognization and destabilization[68]
YTHDF2HighOCT4promotes the liver cancer stem cell phenotype and cancer metastasis[69]
TRMT61A/TRMT6HighPPARδdriving self-renewal of liver CSCs and tumorigenesis[70]
METTL1HighEGFR pathwayEnhances oncogenic mRNA translation and promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression[71]
METTL1High promotes hepatocarcinogenesis via m 7 G tRNA modification-dependent translation control[72]
METTL1 TGF-β2promotes HCC recurrence after radiofrequency ablation[73]
WDR4HighCCNB1promotes proliferation, metastasis, and sorafenib resistance[74]
Table
Table 2. RNA modification and colorectal cancer.
Table 2. RNA modification and colorectal cancer.
EnzymeExpressionTargetsMolecular MechanismRef
METTL3HighGLUT1-mTORC1Facilitates CRC growth[75]
METTL3HighmiR-1246Promotes cell migration, invasion, and metastasis[76]
METTL3HighBHLHE41-CXCL1Induces immune suppression[77]
METTL3/METTL14HighStat1 and Irf1Regulate anti-tumor immune responses[78]
YTHDF1highARHGEF2Promotes CRC growth[79]
YTHDF2 GSK3βPromotes CRC growth[80]
YTHDC1HighcircNSUN2Promotes CRC liver metastasis[81]
ALKBH5HighMct4/Slc16a3Regulate anti-tumor immune responses [82]
FTOLowm6AmImpedes CSC[83]
FTOHighMYCPromotes CRC development[84]
Table
Table 3. RNA modification and gastric cancer.
Table 3. RNA modification and gastric cancer.
EnzymeExpressionTargetsMolecular MechanismRef
METTL3HighHDGFPromotes GC growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis[85]
METTL3HighEMT markersPromotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion[86]
METTL3HighARHGAP5-AS1Promotes chemoresistance[87]
ALKBH5HighNEAT1Promotes cell migration and invasion[88]
FTOHighITGB1Promotes GC metastasis[89]
FTOHighcaveolin-1Promotes GC growth and metastasis[90]
IGF2BP2HighIGF1R-RhoA-ROCKPromotes GC progression[91]
YTHDF1HighFZD7Promotes GC[92]
YTHDF1High Promotes GC and induces antitumor immune response[93]
Table
Table 4. Inhibitors of RNA modification regulators.
Table 4. Inhibitors of RNA modification regulators.
NameTargetIdentification MethodsCancerRef
UZH1AMETTL3Using a structure-based drug discovery approachleukemia[100]
STM2457METTL3A high-throughput screen of 250,000 diverse drug-like compoundsleukemia[101]
quercetinMETTL3Drug screeningcervical[102]
FB23/FB23-2FTOUsing structure-based rational designleukemia[103]
Dac51FTOOptimized previously reported FTO inhibitors FB23 and FB23-2melanoma[104]
FTO-04FTOstructure-based designGlioblastoma[105]
CS1/CS2FTOA structure-based virtual screening of the 260,000 compounds from NCI DTP libraryleukemia[106]
thimerosal, PMA, and thiramTRMT6/TRMT61AScreening of 1600 known drugsHCC[70]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Su, H.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Wu, W.K.K.; Chan, M.T.V.; Chen, H. RNA Modifications in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081918

AMA Style

Zhang X, Su H, Chen H, Li Q, Liu X, Zhang L, Wu WKK, Chan MTV, Chen H. RNA Modifications in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(8):1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoting, Hao Su, Hongyan Chen, Qing Li, Xiaodong Liu, Lin Zhang, William Ka Kei Wu, Matthew Tak Vai Chan, and Huarong Chen. 2022. "RNA Modifications in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives" Biomedicines 10, no. 8: 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081918

APA Style

Zhang, X., Su, H., Chen, H., Li, Q., Liu, X., Zhang, L., Wu, W. K. K., Chan, M. T. V., & Chen, H. (2022). RNA Modifications in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines, 10(8), 1918. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop