1. Introduction
The global population’s accelerating aging trend has increased the demand for treating senile diseases. Osteoporosis, in particular, has a global prevalence rate exceeding 18% across all age groups, with a steady annual increase [
1,
2,
3]. Additionally, the number of patients with osteoporotic fractures is also significantly increasing every year [
1,
2,
4,
5,
6]. Osteoporotic fractures are difficult to treat and often result in refractures and high mortality rates. Therefore, more effective treatments for osteoporotic fractures are needed [
2,
4,
5,
6].
The treatment of osteoporosis typically involves the administration of drugs targeting mechanisms that regulate bone remodeling. Among these drugs are bisphosphonates, which inhibit bone resorption [
7,
8], and parathyroid hormone (PTH) drugs, which stimulate bone formation [
9]. However, bisphosphonates have limitations that restrict their long-term use, such as the potential to induce osteonecrosis in certain patients. Consequently, there is a growing demand for parathyroid hormone drugs [
10,
11].
PTH influences blood calcium concentration and bone metabolism. It acts on bone cells to enhance cell activity and osteogenic differentiation, primarily by stimulating the Wnt signaling pathway. This activation of bone cells promotes the normalization of bone remodeling and inhibits osteoporosis [
12,
13,
14,
15]. Nonetheless, rhPTH(1-34), a representative parathyroid hormone drug, requires administration via injections, which may inconvenience patients due to the need for periodic injections. Therefore, there is a need to find a more effective and convenient method of drug administration.
Synthetic bone grafts are increasingly replacing allogeneic and xenogeneic bone grafts in the treatment of bone defects due to the risk of disease infection and ethical concerns. However, their limited osteoinductive capacity restricts their use in patients with difficult bone regeneration, such as osteoporosis [
16]. Therefore, there is a growing need for synthetic bone graft materials with higher efficacy. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) is a conventional synthetic bone graft material that is widely used due to its high safety in the body and numerous studies [
17,
18]. Recently, whitlockite (WH) has gained attention as a new synthetic bone graft material. WH has the chemical formula Ca
18Mg
2(HPO
4)
2(PO
4)
12 and is also found in the body [
17,
19]. Research on WH has been actively conducted recently due to its higher bone regeneration efficacy and faster degradation by osteoclasts in the body compared to HAP [
17,
20].
Therefore, the incorporation of WH, a novel bone graft material, alongside HAP, is anticipated to yield more effective bone regeneration in conditions where bone regeneration is challenging, such as osteoporotic fractures. Moreover, the concurrent administration of PTH, known to augment bone regeneration, during bone grafting is expected to synergize with the two materials, fostering effective bone regeneration.
In this study, we applied PTH directly to the defect during bone grafting to effectively treat osteoporotic bone defects. We compared the bone regeneration process under osteoporosis by applying two types of bone grafts, WH and HAP, each with distinct properties. Calvarial defects were induced in rats with osteoporosis through ovariectomy. The regeneration process was analyzed by applying different bone grafts along with PTH. This study aimed to compare the suitability of bone graft materials for osteoporotic defects and to assess the efficacy of directly applying PTH to the defect, aiming to explore more effective treatments for osteoporotic bone defects.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bone Graft Preparation
Bone graft was fabricated by a polyurethane sponge replica method [
21]. The coating slurry was prepared by mixing 55 wt% calcium phosphate ceramic powder and 7 wt% polyvinyl butyral (PVB, M.W. 40,000~70,000, Aladdin, Riverside, CA, USA) in ethanol solvent using a planetary mill. The calcium phosphate ceramics used were whitlockite (WH, CAS NO. 106984-49-0, H&Bio Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea) and hydroxyapatite (HAP, CAS NO. 1306-06-5, Daejung chemical, Siheung-si, Republic of Korea), respectively. Polyurethane sponges with a pore size of 50 ppi were fully immersed in the prepared slurry and spun at 800 rpm using a spin coater to evenly coat them without clumping. The sponges were dried at 60 °C for three hours. This coating process was repeated four times. Next, the bone graft was treated in a furnace at 500 °C for 2 h to remove the remaining polymer and sintered at 1000 °C for 2 h to produce the bone graft. The fabricated bone grafts were then sieved to a size of 1 mm to 600 μm and sterilized prior to use.
2.2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis
X-ray diffraction (XRD, MiniFlex600, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) measurements were performed to confirm the crystal structure of the fabricated bone graft. The measurements were taken from 10 to 70° at a rate of 1°/min. The measured data were matched with WH (9012137) and HAP (9013627) from Crystallography Open Database (COD) and confirmed that the fabricated WH and HAP bone grafts were formed from pure WH and HAP.
2.3. Animal Surgery and Treatment
The animal studies were performed after receiving approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Seventy-five female Sprague Dawley (SD) rats weighing 220 ± 10 g were used to create an osteoporosis model through ovariectomy (OVX). The ovariectomy was performed under respiratory anesthesia with isoflurane (Ifran Liq., Hana Pharm, Seoul, Korea) by incising the outer and inner skin at the ovarian position of rats, exposing the ovary, and then resecting it. The inner and outer skin were then sutured and sanitized to complete the ovariectomy. Subsequently, bone mineral density (BMD) was monitored using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Inalyzer, Medikors, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea) to determine the presence of osteoporosis. At week 13, a decrease in BMD of over 30% was observed, confirming the development of osteoporosis. In week 14, a calvarial defect model was performed. To create the calvarial defect, osteoporotic rats were anesthetized and a sagittal incision was made over the middle sagittal crest. An 8 mm diameter defect was then created using a trephine burr. Each group was implanted with 30 mg of the following bone grafts. There were five experimental groups: the study included a sham control group (sham) without bone grafts and groups with whitlockite grafts (WH), hydroxyapatite grafts (HAP), whitlockite grafts with PTH drug (WH + PTH), and hydroxyapatite grafts with PTH drug (HAP + PTH). After the bone graft was placed, the group receiving PTH drug was treated with 56.5 mg/kg teriparatide (parathyroid hormone fragment 1-34 human, EP reference standard, Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) dissolved in 20 μL saline and thoroughly absorbed onto the graft material (
Figure S2). The incisions were then sutured and sanitized to complete the surgery. At 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-surgery, five rats from each group were euthanized using CO
2 gas. The surgical sites were then harvested and fixed in formalin solution (Formaldehyde 3.7% Solution, Biosesang, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea) for storage.
2.4. Micro-CT Analysis
The harvested bone samples were measured by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT, Skyscan1173, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) at 130 kV, 60 μA, 500 ms. The measured data were reconstructed for 3D analysis, and the volume and surface area of the bone and graft materials were calculated using software (CTAn, Bruker, Germany). Since the measured radiodensity of the remaining graft overlapped with the radiodensity of the regenerated bone and a clear separation of the remaining graft and the new bone was not possible, the value including both the volume of the new bone and the remaining graft was calculated as bone volume (BV) and the value including both the surface area of the new bone and the remaining graft was calculated as bone surface area (BS).
2.5. Histological and Histomorphometric Analysis
For histological analysis, the harvested tissues were decalcified using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, Daejung chemical, Siheung-si, Republic of Korea) at pH 7.2 for one week. Subsequently, the decalcified tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned for staining. Three types of stains were used: hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson’s trichrome (MT), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase/methyl green (TRAP). H&E staining was performed to analyze the morphology and cell behavior of the tissue formed at the defect site, and MT staining was performed to analyze the formation of new bone and collagen fibers. TRAP staining was used to analyze the distribution and activity of osteoclasts. The stained slides were examined under a light microscope at ×60 magnification. Histomorphometric analysis was calculated by measuring the area of tissue corresponding to each connective tissue (CT), new bone (NB), and remaining bone graft (BG) using the ImageJ program (
https://imagej.net/).
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA test, followed by Tukey test. Statistical significance was considered based on the p-value: * p < 0.05 vs. Sham group, ** p < 0.01 vs. Sham group, *** p < 0.001 vs. Sham group, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001. Post hoc power analysis using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7) showed that all statistical analyses had a power exceeding 0.8.
4. Discussion
In this study, we compared bone regeneration using different grafts in an osteoporosis model and investigated the efficacy of directly applying PTH to the defect site. To accomplish this, we established a calvarial defect model in osteoporotic SD rats and assessed the effects of WH and HAP grafts, as well as PTH drug application, on the defect. The analysis showed a higher degree of regeneration in the WH graft than in the HAP graft within the range of error and a higher degree of regeneration than in the WH + PTH when PTH was applied.
Tissue area fraction analysis by tissue staining showed that WH, unlike HAP, tended to decrease in area as the remaining graft degraded toward week 12, while HAP showed little graft degradation (
Figure 4a). In addition, in WH, NB formation occurred continuously and the value of NB + BG increased despite the decrease in BG, whereas, in HAP, the increase in NB was lower, resulting in a lower value of NB + BG compared to WH. This shows that the degradation of BG is more active and the formation of NB is more active in WH.
It can be seen that this degradation of BG is more evident with local application of the PTH drug. The area fraction of BG in the WH + PTH group demonstrates the lowest value at week 4 and continues to decline towards week 12. Consequently, the lowest BV/TV values observed during the initial 4 weeks in the WH + PTH group can be attributed to the substantial initial degradation of BG, resulting in a low BV (
Figure 2b). As regeneration progresses in the WH + PTH group, an increasing amount of NB is formed, with week 12 exhibiting the lowest amount of BG and the highest amount of NB. This signifies the most active degradation of BG and the most vigorous formation of NB in the WH + PTH group. However, in the HAP group, even with PTH application, there is minimal degradation of BG, and the formation of NB at week 12 does not differ significantly from that in the HAP group.
This was also confirmed by TRAP staining (
Figure 3c). TRAP staining showed that osteoclast activity was much higher in WH than in HAP at the beginning of regeneration at week 4, indicating active BG degradation. Furthermore, WH + PTH showed the highest level of osteoclast activity. TRAP expression is seen on the surface of the graft and, in the case of WH and WH + PTH, osteoclasts penetrate the graft and are activated. These TRAP staining results suggest that osteoclast-mediated degradation of the graft is active in WH and WH + PTH, with further enhancement in the presence of PTH.
The effect of osteoclast activation on the regeneration of the degraded graft is evident in the MT staining results at week 12 (
Figure 3d). In both HAP and HAP + PTH groups, the boundary between the new bone and the graft is clearly defined, with new bone forming on the surface of the graft. However, in the case of WH, the boundary between the graft and the new bone is less distinct. New bone has penetrated and formed in areas where graft degradation has occurred, indicating active osteointegration. This phenomenon is more pronounced in WH + PTH group when PTH is applied. It is observed that graft material degradation is highly active with PTH application, leading to the replacement of graft material by new bone and subsequent bone integration.
Bone surface density data indicate that BS/TV increases as healing progresses in WH and WH + PTH groups but not in HAP and HAP + PTH groups (
Figure 2c). This suggests that, in WH and WH + PTH groups, bone regeneration occurs throughout the defect area, leading to an increase in surface area. Conversely, in HAP and HAP + PTH groups, regeneration occurs primarily around the initially formed new bone and does not actively progress to new areas.
Furthermore, the bone surface density analysis reveals that BS/BV is higher in WH and WH + PTH than in HAP and HAP + PTH, indicating that the surface area of NB and BG is higher in WH (
Figure 2d). This is likely attributed to the more active degradation of BG in WH, resulting in a higher surface area. In contrast, BG is less degraded in HAP, leading to a lower surface area.
These results suggest that WH graft degradation is more active than HAP graft degradation in the osteoporosis model, primarily due to early osteoclast activation during regeneration. Moreover, osteoclast activation influences new bone formation, with greater activation in the early stage leading to increased new bone formation in the later stages. These findings can be explained by osteoclast-induced resorption of the graft material, providing calcium and phosphorus ions to the bone regeneration site. Consequently, this normalizes the bone remodeling process by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, facilitating bone regeneration [
22,
23,
24]. Additionally, the applied PTH, known to activate bone cells such as osteoclasts and osteoblasts, further accelerates this process [
12,
13,
14,
15]. Local treatment of PTH enhances osteoclast activation in the early regeneration stage, aiding in graft material resorption and subsequently increasing the degree of bone regeneration in the later stages of regeneration [
13,
25].
The progression of new bone regeneration from the surface of the graft to its interior was facilitated as the degradation of the graft was activated. This penetration of new bone into the graft was more pronounced with the application of PTH, which activated osteoclasts. Based on these results, it is evident that the application of bone graft in an osteoporosis model can lead to higher regeneration in the graft that can be more easily degraded by osteoclasts. Moreover, the direct application of PTH to the defect site can maximize new bone regeneration by stimulating osteoclasts in the early stages of regeneration and promoting osseointegration between the new bone and the graft. Consequently, this approach results in more efficient bone regeneration. Therefore, in the context of an osteoporosis model, implantation of a graft material such as WH, which degrades faster in the body compared to a slower-degrading material like HAP, offers advantages for regeneration. This advantage can be further augmented by local application of PTH.
5. Conclusions
The bone regeneration between WH and HAP grafts was analyzed under the OVX rat osteoporosis model. PTH(1-34), one of the anti-osteoporotic drugs, was directly applied to the defects to analyze bone regeneration in osteoporosis. In the osteoporosis model, bone regeneration was higher in the WH graft, which has a faster degradation rate in the body, than in the HAP graft. The application of PTH increased the degradation rate of the WH graft and increased bone regeneration. It is suggested that the activation of osteoclasts due to the degradation of bone graft material in the early stages of regeneration is beneficial for bone regeneration and osseointegration. Additionally, the application of PTH drugs can activate bone cells, including osteoclasts, resulting in a higher level of bone regeneration and osseointegration. In conclusion, for osteoporotic bone defects, bone graft materials that can be easily degraded by osteoclasts, such as WH, are more suitable. Additionally, local treatment with PTH can activate osteoclasts around the bone graft in the early stages of regeneration, leading to higher bone regeneration and improved osseointegration.