RETRACTED: Power Cable Status Evaluation Method Based on Electrical Tree Growth and Data Association Rules

Abstract

The partial discharge (PD) analysis method has remained one of the key technologies for cable condition assessment to diagnose cable operation state. In this paper, two power cable status evaluation methods are proposed based on electrical tree growth and data association rules, respectively. First, in the field of molecular thermodynamics, based on the law of energy conservation of electrical tree growth, this paper studies the relationship between PD signals in cable insulation and the length of the electrical tree. By using the length of electrical tree growth to calculate the probability of PD failure of cables, a cable state assessment method based on electrical tree growth is proposed. Second, for power cable status evaluation, the strong concealment characteristics of cables result in a long power supply recovery time and a serious threat to power supply reliability. Therefore, a group of comprehensive cable status parameters are set by analyzing the status parameters based on data association rules. The comprehensive state of power cables is divided into four elements, and the weight coefficients of cable states are calculated based on data association rule methods. Finally, the simulation results verify the effectiveness and accuracy for the two different power cable status evaluation methods.

1. Introduction

Recently, with the continuous development in urban distribution networks, power cables have become an important component of urban power grids, and their applications are increasing yearly [1,2,3]. In urban distribution systems, XLPE cables have become the mainstream equipment for electrical energy transmission in urban power grids due to their excellent electrical [4], mechanical [5], and thermal performance [6], as well as their maintenance-free and high reliability characteristics [4,7]. However, some cables are approaching the end of their service life, and insulation aging issues are currently becoming increasingly severe [8,9]. At the same time, due to most cables being buried underground, the harsh subsurface environment significantly shortens their lifespan and leads to line faults [10,11,12].

The utilization of PD for the diagnosis of XLPE cables has emerged as one of the fundamental technologies employed for assessing the condition of cables in power grids globally [13,14,15]. The PD parameter, which plays a significant role in reflecting the insulation condition of cables, maintains a close relationship with the overall insulation condition. As the number of internal discharge channels increases in the cable insulation, electrical trees are formed. Once an electrical tree is formed, it continues to grow and breaks down the cable insulation. The observation and evaluation of the formation and growth process of electrical trees in cables during actual operation are regarded as highly challenging [16,17].

The normal operation of electrical equipment is one of the prerequisites. As cables are widely used, the frequency of trips and power outages has also increased. Cables are usually buried underground, making it difficult to detect faults when compared to other equipment, and troubleshooting and maintenance are more challenging [15,16,17,18,19]. Currently, monitoring systems equipped with power cables, such as real-time parameters like cable temperature and partial discharge, can be obtained through the monitoring system [18].

Currently, there have been several studies focused on this aspect [19,20,21]. Reference [17] constructed fuzzy membership functions and established the model. Reference [20] proposed a comprehensive three-level fuzzy evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fault diagnosis and condition assessment methods for electrical equipment have evolved toward integrated intelligent technologies. Integrated intelligent technologies employ various information fusion methods and combine multiple approaches to compensate for each other’s deficiencies. Currently, domestic and foreign scholars have utilized association rule analysis for evaluating large-scale transformer equipment, and they have achieved favorable results. This method can discover correlations among different states instead of calculating indicator weight scores through subjective comparisons, thus effectively avoiding the influence of subjective factors [14,16].

Therefore, two power cable status evaluation methods based on electrical tree growth and data association rules, respectively, are proposed in this paper. The power cable status evaluation method based on electrical tree growth investigates the relationship in cable insulation, which is based on the energy conservation law of electrical tree growth in the field of molecular thermodynamics. A cable condition assessment method is proposed based on electrical tree growth to calculate the probability of PD faults in cables. This paper utilizes PD data from 10 kV XLPE cables, records the growth process of electrical trees, and calculates the probability of PD faults in cables using the evaluation model proposed herein. This validates the effectiveness of the cable condition assessment method based on electrical tree growth, as proposed in this paper.

For the power cable status evaluation method based on data association rules, the rules are referenced, analyzed, and applied to assess the condition of power cables. First, a group of comprehensive cable status parameters are set by analyzing the status parameters. Next, the comprehensive state of power cables is divided into four elements, the weight coefficients of cable states are calculated based on data association rule methods, and a cable condition assessment based on data association rules is finally proposed for the existing cable condition. Lastly, simulation analysis based on case studies is conducted, and the simulation results validate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method.

2. Power Cable Status Evaluation Method Based on Electrical Tree Growth

2.1. Partial Discharge and Electrical Trees

The main characteristic of cable faults is the occurrence of microcracks in the dielectric material. Initially, microvoids are generated at the front of the electrical tree tip, and these microvoids extend together with tiny electrical branches. Once the microvoids and electrical branches are formed, it can be considered that the electrical tree has grown. The relationship between the linear size and branches is given by [3,4]:

$$X={\left(\frac{L}{L_b}\right)}^{d_f}$$

(1)

where $L_b$ represents the mean linear size of electrical tree growth, L represents the linear size of the electrical tree, X represents the total number of branches in the electrical tree, and $d_f$ represents the fractal dimension number of branches in the electrical tree.

The growth pattern of electric trees can be expressed as [3,4]:

$$L=L_b{\left(\frac{kT}{h{N}_b}\exp (\frac{\alpha C_0\pi \epsilon E^2-U_0}{kT})\right)}^{1/d_f}{t}^{1/d_f}$$

(2)

where $N_b$ represents the number of microvoids formed for electrical tree formation, k represents the Boltzmann constant, h represents the Planck constant, T represents the ambient temperature in Kelvin, E represents the electric field strength in volt/meter (V/m) units, ε represents the dielectric constant, C₀ represents the linear size of microvoids, α represents the performance coefficient of the material, U₀ represents the active energy in joules (J), and t represents the time.

In Equation (2), E can be calculated as described in Reference [7]. The growth of the electrical tree is determined by the voltage intensity at the top of the tree, and the curvature radius at the needle tip is as follows [3,4]:

$$E=\frac{2Va}{l\ln \left(\frac{1+a}{a-1}\right)}$$

(3)

$$a=\sqrt{1+\frac{l}{w}}$$

(4)

where l represents the length, w represents the distance from the electrical tree tip to the grounding electrode, and V represents the voltage amplitude in volts (V). If R represents the distance between the needle electrodes, then w = R − l.

2.2. Calculation Model for the Length of Electrical Tree Growth in PD

The energy required to generate tree length $W_b$ is given by [3,4]:

$$W_b=N_b\left(U_0-\alpha C_0\pi \epsilon E^2\right)$$

(5)

During $\Delta t$, the corresponding increment in the number of microvoids is $\Delta X$; $\Delta X$ is given by:

$$\Delta X=\frac{W\times N_b}{W_b}$$

(6)

The energy of PD during a time period $\Delta t$ is W, which can be expressed as:

$$W={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^N{W}_i}={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^N\frac{1}{2}}{q}_i{v}_i$$

(7)

where $W_i$ represents the energy during the time period, $q_i$ represents the discharge magnitude, $v_i$ represents the initial voltage, and N represents the aggregate of discharges during the time period. The expression for $\Delta X$ can be expressed as:

$$\Delta X=\frac{{\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^N\frac{1}{2}}{q}_i{v}_i}{U_0-\alpha C_0\pi \epsilon E^2}$$

(8)

Based on the analysis above, it can be understood that the length of an electrical tree can be influenced by ambient temperature, branch dimensionality, and material properties. Therefore, the relationship between PDs, temperature, and the length of electrical tree growth in cable insulation can be determined through fractal patterns, growth laws, and electric field strength associated with electrical tree branching. Consequently, it is possible to calculate the growth length of electrical trees within a given time period.

Assuming that at time $t_1$ and $t_2$, the electrical branch length, number of microvoids, and electric field strength are represented by $L_{\psi }(\psi =1,2)$, $X_{\psi }(\psi =1,2)$, and $E_{\psi }(\psi =1,2)$, respectively, the equations can be expressed as follows [3,4]:

$$E_{\psi }=\frac{2V\sqrt{1+\frac{L_{\psi }}{R-L_{\psi }}}}{L_{\psi }\ln \left[\frac{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{L_{\psi }}{R-L_{\psi }}}}{\sqrt{1+\frac{L_{\psi }}{R-L_{\psi }}}-1}\right]}$$

(9)

$$L_{\psi }=L_b{\left(\frac{kT}{h{N}_b}\exp (\frac{\alpha C_0\pi \epsilon E_1{}^2-U_0}{kT})\right)}^{1/d_f}{t}_{\psi }{}^{1/d_f}$$

(10)

$$X_{\psi }={\left(\frac{L_{\psi }}{L_b}\right)}^{d_f}$$

(11)

$$\Delta X=X_2-X_1$$

(12)

$$\Delta t=t_2-t_1$$

(13)

By simultaneously solving the nonlinear system of Equations (9) to (13) and iteratively solving it using a computational program, we can obtain the values of L₁ and L₂.

2.3. Evaluation of the Probability of PD Faults in XLPE Cables

2.3.1. Stress–Strength Interference Model

Generally, the strength of a component follows a statistical distribution within a certain range [9]. The condition for the normal operation of a component can be expressed as:

$$S-s>0$$

(14)

where S represents the strength of the component and s represents the stress of the component. The strength S and stress s are both random variables.

The stress–strength interference method is illustrated in Figure 1 [9].

$$p(s)=h(s){\displaystyle {\int }_{-\infty }^{s}f(S)dS}$$

(15)

$$F={\displaystyle {\int }_0^{+\infty }h(s)\left[{\displaystyle {\int }_{-\infty }^{s}f(S)dS}\right]}ds$$

(16)

where h(s) represents the probability density function of the stress, f(s) represents the probability density function of the mechanical strength, and p(s) represents the probability density function of failure.

The shaded area represents the “stress–strength interference region”. Based on the stress–strength relationship described above, the aforementioned model can be used to calculate the probabilities of strength being either greater or less than stress, known as the “stress–strength interference model”.

The model can make stress suitable for addressing stochastic problems. XLPE cables experience various stress factors during operation, such as PD, making it a random event. The location of the PD-defects aging process exhibits a certain level of dispersion. Therefore, when calculating the cable failure probability, it is necessary to consider these two random variables, making the stress–strength interference model appropriate for solving such scenarios.

2.3.2. Estimation of the Probability of PD Faults

PD increases the local electric field strength around the insulation fault points in the cable, leading to the growth of electrical trees. The procedure to calculate the discharge failure probability is as follows: First, collect and organize PD data from faulty XLPE cables. Then, apply nonparametric statistical data analysis on the length of electrical tree branches in the faulty cable. Finally, calculate the length using temperature data and PD information.

Owing to the random nature of PD and temperature in operation, the temperature data and PD conditions measured during a specific time interval represent only instantaneous values. Therefore, PD data can be calculated for different measurements; insulation failure occurrence is governed by the following equation:

$$F_{FD}={\displaystyle {\int }_0^{+\infty }{h}_{FD}(l)\left[{\displaystyle {\int }_{-\infty }^l{f}_{FD}(L)dL}\right]}dl$$

(17)

3. Power Cable Status Evaluation Method Based on Data Association Rules

3.1. Comprehensive State Parameters for Power Cables

(A)

Key parameter preprocessing

With data sensors, device detection technology, and online monitoring technology, the application scope of database management systems has been expanding. These data often lack obvious data characteristics, are not intuitive, and may suffer from information loss. The purpose of data mining is to extract potential relationships among a large volume of rich data. Therefore, this paper combines data mining technology to analyze, process, and refine historical data into effective parameters quickly and efficiently, and the flowchart is shown in Figure 2.

(B)

Construction of state model

The selection of appropriate parameters is crucial for a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the operating condition of power cables, considering the large number and complexity of parameters. The comprehensive state of power cables is divided into four elements: online monitoring, offline detection, equipment information, and routine inspection information. The principles of the cable condition assessment system and factors influencing the operating condition of power cables are shown in

Table 1. Evaluation index.

Indicators	Status
Online	dielectric loss
	core temperature
	grounding current
Offline	voltage test

.

3.2. Calculation of Weight Coefficients

Subjective factors usually affect the state of power equipment during its assessment, which emphasizes the crucial role of weight coefficients for the state variables in equipment evaluation. However, these methods have certain drawbacks, such as computational complexity. In this paper, the weight coefficients of cable states are calculated based on data association rule methods. Association rules can reflect interdependencies and correlations among items. This approach helps to analyze further the associative mechanisms among items and subsets, and to identify frequent items or attributes in events.

The database is defined as I, where $I=\left\{i_1,i_2,i_3,\cdots ,i_N\right\}$ is the set of all items; among $i_n=\left\{{\phi }_1,{\phi }_2,{\phi }_3,\cdots ,{\phi }_N\right\}$, $\phi$ is the specific item. If $I=\left\{{\phi }_1,{\phi }_2,{\phi }_3,\cdots ,{\phi }_N\right\}$ is the set of all contained items, any set A containing $\phi$ is an itemset, and if $\left|A\right|=k$, then it is the k itemset. In database I, the number of supported items is called item A and contains item set A. This association rule can be expressed as:

$$\sup (A\to B)=\frac{\left|I(A\cup B)\right|}{\left|I\right|}\times 100\%$$

(18)

The ratio can be expressed as:

$$con(A\to B)=\frac{\left|I(A\cup B)\right|}{\left|A\right|}\times 100\%$$

(19)

where Database I = {total number of power cable accidents} and $B_i$ = {the part i component failure}. When power cables experience a fault, it implies that one comprehensive index is performing poorly.

Based on Formulas (18) and (19), the calculation formula for support and confidence in association rules can be obtained as follows:

$$\sup (A_{ij}\to B_i)=P(A_{ij}\cup B_i)=\frac{\delta (A_{ij}\cup B_i)}{\left|I\right|}\times 100\%$$

(20)

$$con(A_{ij}\to B_i)=\frac{P(A_{ij}\cup B_i)}{P(A_{ij})}=\frac{\delta (A_{ij}\cup B_i)}{\delta (A_{ij})}\times 100\%$$

(21)

The weight coefficient can be expressed as:

$${\omega }_{ij}=\frac{C_{ij}}{C_{i1}+C_{i2}+C_{i3}+\cdots +C_{in}}$$

(22)

Based on Equation (22), the status quantity of each single item can be obtained. The score of each status quantity can be expressed as:

$$u_{ij}=\frac{\mathrm{warning} \mathrm{value}-\mathrm{experience} \mathrm{value}}{\mathrm{warning} \mathrm{value}-\mathrm{initial} \mathrm{value}}$$

(23)

$$y_i={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^n{u}_{ij}}{w}_{ij}$$

(24)

Introducing variable weights:

$$w_i^v=\frac{w_i^{}{y}_i^{\alpha -1}}{{\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^n{w}_i^{}{y}_i^{\alpha -1}}}$$

(25)

In the formula: $w_i^v$ indicates the variable weight coefficient, $w_i^{}=1/4$; $\alpha$ represents the balance factor, $0\le \alpha \le 1$.

3.3. Power Cable Condition Assessment Process

The condition assessment process is as follows:

(1) Collect the cable test and operation data and establish the comprehensive state quantity index through the association analysis rule method, as shown in Table 1;

(2) Calculate the confidence and weight coefficient based on Formulas (21) and (22);

(3) Based on Formula (24), calculate the number of comprehensive states;

(4) The cable comprehensive score $F={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^n{y}_i^{}{w}_i^v}$ is calculated through the comprehensive status score and variable weight coefficient, and the cable status is judged according to the score.

A flow chart showing the cable status assessment procedure is shown in Figure 3.

4. Case Study

4.1. Example Simulation and Analysis for the Power Cable Status Evaluation Method Based on Electrical Tree Growth

This paper takes an example of PD faults in XLPE cables to calculate the probability of cable failures.

Step 1: Set n = 50. Assume that data for the PD pulse cluster and temperature measurements are conducted for the cable every $\Delta t$ = 1 s.

Table 2. Cable PD and temperature data.

Groups	PD	Temperature	Groups	PD	Temperature
1	820	30.1	26	1035	30.1
2	870	30.1	27	885	30.3
3	810	30.3	28	925	30.1
4	970	30.4	29	1035	30.3
5	770	30.3	30	915	30.0
6	1010	30.1	31	785	30.1
7	860	30.2	32	725	30.0
8	760	30.2	33	1045	30.3
9	940	30.3	34	895	30.1
10	1040	30.4	35	975	30.2
11	1140	30.3	36	1075	30.3
12	890	30.1	37	985	30.2
13	940	30.3	38	835	30.0
14	990	30.2	39	915	30.1
15	1050	30.0	40	865	30.0
16	1110	30.2	41	1095	30.3
17	750	30.1	42	1075	30.4
18	830	30.1	43	955	30.1
19	980	30.4	44	855	30.2
20	1070	30.5	45	935	30.2
21	1030	30.2	46	1065	30.4
22	960	30.2	47	1025	30.2
23	950	30.3	48	815	30.0
24	850	30.2	49	945	30.3
25	1000	30.2	50	995	30.4

shows 50 sets of PD and temperature data.

Step 2: Calculate the length corresponding to the data shown in Table 2.

Set value W_b. Applying Equation (8), $\Delta X$ = 1.67364 × 10¹³ for the time interval t₀~t₁.

Assume that at time $t_0$ and $t_1$, we can use Equations (9) to (16) to calculate $\Delta t$ and $\Delta X$.

Based on the parameters shown in

Table 3. Cable Parameter value.

Parameter	Value
$\epsilon$	$2.25\times 8.85\times {10}^{-12}\hspace{0.33em}{\mathrm{Fm}}^{-1}$
$L_b$	${10}^{-5}\hspace{0.33em}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$
$T$	$308.15\hspace{0.33em}\mathrm{K}$
$df$	$1.15$
$k$	$1.38\times {10}^{-23}\hspace{0.33em}{\mathrm{JK}}^{-1}$
$h$	$6.626\times {10}^{-34}\hspace{0.33em}\mathrm{Js}$
$\alpha C_0$	$6\times {10}^{-27}\hspace{0.33em}{\mathrm{m}}^3$
$U_0$	$2.40\times {10}^{-19}\hspace{0.33em}\mathrm{J}$
$r$	$5\hspace{0.33em} \mathsf{\mu }\mathrm{m}$
$R$	$2 \hspace{0.33em}\mathrm{mm}$

and substituting them into Equations (9) to (13), the calculated result for L of the cable under this set of data is L₁ = 1.411 mm.

Similarly, based on these calculation steps, the electrical tree length for next sets of data can be computed. By employing nonparametric estimation methods for the probability density distribution, $h_{FD}(l)$ within time interval $t_0$ and $t_1$ can be approximated as a Weibull distribution. The expression is as follows:

$$h_{FD}(l)=\frac{24.5786l^{23.5786}}{1.4118l^{24.5786}}\exp \left[-{\left(\frac{l}{1.4118}\right)}^{24.5786}\right]$$

(26)

Step 3: Collect and organize PD (PD) data near the faults in XLPE cables to facilitate the calculation of their electrical tree length. This can be achieved by directly examining the faulty cable segment and obtaining the length. Assuming it follows a normal distribution, it can be expressed as:

$$f_{FD}(L)=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2\pi }}\exp \left[-\frac{1}{2}{\left(\frac{L-2}{2}\right)}^2\right]$$

(27)

Step 4: Solve for the probability of PD faults in the cable using the following integration method:

$$F_{RD-t_1}={\displaystyle {\int }_0^{+\infty }{h}_{t_1}(l)\left[{\displaystyle {\int }_{-\infty }^l{f}_{FD}(L)dL}\right]}dl=22.73\%$$

(28)

From this, it can be inferred that the corresponding probability of PD (PD) faults in the cable for the 30 sets of data is 22.73%. This indicates that the method proposed in this article can be used for quantitative estimation of the PD fault probability in XLPE cables and yields more effective and accurate results compared to traditional assessments.

4.2. Example Simulation and Analysis for the Power Cable Status Evaluation Method Based on Data Association Rules

To verify the method based on data association rules proposed in this paper, the cable condition was evaluated by considering the 8.7/15 kv power cable line and the 368 cross-section sample data that were collected. The state quantity results are shown in

Table 4. State quantity result.

Comprehensive Indicators	Fault Cases	Number of Single Fault	Single Fault Cases	Support	Confidence	Weight Coefficient
Online monitoring	112	130	110	0.9831	0.7692	0.2541
		145	99	0.8991	0.6827	0.2267
		133	106	0.9473	0.7969	0.2638
		134	105	0.9473	0.7835	0.2681
Offline detection	110	156	95	0.9523	0.6089	0.3130
		135	93	0.9334	0.6889	0.3243
		120	85	0.8567	0.7083	0.3331
Equipment	72	62	60	0.8329	0.9677	0.3295
		60	52	0.7235	0.8667	0.3122
		63	54	0.7560	0.8571	0.3173
Routine inspection	84	120	76	0.9022	0.6333	0.3247
		110	79	0.9418	0.7181	0.3763
		132	80	0.9537	0.6061	0.3291

.

In Table 4, we can see that the support degree is higher than 0.60, and the comprehensive state and coefficient results are shown in

Table 5. The comprehensive state and coefficient results.

Indicators	Score	Coefficient
Online	14.39	0.5337
Offline	64.75	0.2461
Equipment	87.62	0.1377
Routine inspection	86.37	0.1578

.

Table 5 shows that, except for online indicators, all indicator scores such as offline information and equipment information exceed 60 points. The comprehensive status score of online information is only 14.39, which is the lowest for all indicators. Therefore, under this comprehensive indicator, there must be a single state failure. After monitoring and testing by the operation and maintenance personnel, the cable fault can be found.

Based on 110 groups of sample data, including 46 groups of faulty data and 64 groups of normal cable data, we can obtain the sample score results to evaluate the effectiveness of this method. The sample score results for the method proposed in this paper and those from Reference [22] are shown in Figure 4.

For the method proposed in this paper, Figure 4 shows that there are 36 faults with scores ranging from 0 to 20 (severe faults in the cable); 6 faults with scores ranging from 21 to 40 (abnormal status for the cable); and 4 faults with scores ranging from 41 to 60 (mild abnormal status for the cable). The total number of faults is 46. Therefore, the results—46 faults and 64 normal—are basically consistent with sample data and the results from Reference [22] (47 faults and 63 normal results were obtained), which proves that the evaluation methods proposed in this paper are effective and more precise than the method proposed in Reference [22].

5. Conclusions

In this paper, two power cable status evaluation methods are proposed based on electrical tree growth and data association rules, respectively.

The power cable status evaluation method, based on electrical tree growth, aims to achieve quantitative and accurate assessment of the cable’s condition. The proposed method combines cable temperature and PD data. Through numerical examples, it has been demonstrated that the proposed method is effective and can accurately evaluate the probability of PD faults in cables.

The power cable status evaluation method based on data association rules uses data mining techniques to process large and complex datasets. This is combined with relevant individual project statuses and incorporates comprehensive evaluation indicators to achieve better assessment of the cable condition. The use of association rule methods for calculating weight coefficients effectively avoids the influence of subjective evaluations. Additionally, the introduction of a balanced weighting formula helps to address the degradation of comprehensive state performance.