Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Analysis of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Using the BEST-1DConvNet Model
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Saturation Interpretation Methods for Ultra-Low Permeability Argillaceous Sandstone Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Huangliu Formation in the Dongfang Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Catalytic Conversion of Oil in Model and Natural Reservoir Rocks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

In-Situ and Ex-Situ Processes during Production, Transportation and Refinery of Heavy Oil

Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(2), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020273
Submission received: 22 January 2024 / Accepted: 24 January 2024 / Published: 26 January 2024
Heavy oil and natural bitumen are expected to be alternatives to the depleting conventional crude oil resources for the coming decades, mainly due to their sustainability, safety and huge number of reserves worldwide [1,2]. However, there are some challenges, not only with the recovery of such unconventional hydrocarbons, but also with their transportation, storage and refinery, due to their high viscosity and density, low ratio of H/Cat. and significant content of heteroatoms, asphaltenes and heavy metals [3,4,5,6]. The latter is prone to poisoning catalysts during refinery processes, which is very cost effective [7]. Various industrially applied and successfully enhanced oil recovery techniques have been developed to produce heavy oil and natural bitumen via temporary viscosity reduction [8]. However, the rheology and quality of the recovered crude oil, and its environmental consequences, remain unsatisfactory. The industry needs hybrid techniques to combine recovery with processing in order to permanently reduce viscosity and improve the quality of the produced crude oil with less impact on the environment. Therefore, the subject of in situ and ex situ upgrading is becoming more and more relevant both from a scientific and practical point of view. The given Special Issue (SI) gathered eight selected articles which highlight the emerging scientific insights and technological advances in enhanced oil recovery methods and in the catalytic upgrading of heavy oil.
In total, fourteen manuscripts were submitted for consideration in the given Special Issue, among which eight were accepted for publication. The selected published articles are listed below:
  • Okhotnikova, E.S.; Barskaya, E.E.; Ganeeva, Y.M.; Yusupova, T.N.; Dengaev, A.V.; Vakhin, A.V. Catalytic Conversion of Oil in Model and Natural Reservoir Rocks. Processes 2023, 11, 2380. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11082380.
  • Kholmurodov, T.; Mirzaev, O.; Affane, B.; Tajik, A.; Romanova, K.; Galyametdinov, Y.; Dengaev, A.; Vakhin, A. Thermochemical Upgrading of Heavy Crude Oil in Reservoir Conditions. Processes 2023, 11, 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11072156.
  • Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Lou, T.; Pan, Z.; Hu, M. Integrated a Fused Silica Capillary Cell and In Situ Raman Spectroscopy for Determining the Solubility of CO2 in n-Decane and n-Decane + n-Hexane System. Processes 2023, 11, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11041137.
  • Sorokin, A.S.; Bolotov, A.V.; Nuriev, D.R.; Derevyanko, V.K.; Minkhanov, I.F.; Varfolomeev, M.A. Dynamic Criteria for Physical Modeling of Oil Displacement by Gas Injection. Processes 2022, 10, 2620. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122620.
  • Anikin, O.V.; Bolotov, A.V.; Mukhutdinova, A.R.; Varfolomeev, M.A. Evaluation of the Kinetic and Thermodynamic Behavior of Tracers for Their Applicability in SWCTT. Processes 2022, 10, 2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112395.
  • Ponomarev, A.A.; Gafurov, M.R.; Kadyrov, M.A.; Tugushev, O.A.; Drugov, D.A.; Vaganov, Y.V.; Zavatsky, M.D. Impact of Geomagnetic Fields on the Geochemical Evolution of Oil. Processes 2022, 10, 2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112376.
  • Aliev, F.; Mirzaev, O.; Kholmurodov, T.; Slavkina, O.; Vakhin, A. Utilization of Carbon Dioxide via Catalytic Hydrogenation Processes during Steam-Based Enhanced Oil Recovery. Processes 2022, 10, 2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112306.
  • Kholmurodov, T.; Aliev, F.; Mirzaev, O.; Dengaev, A.; Tajik, A.; Vakhin, A. Hydrothermal In-Reservoir Upgrading of Heavy Oil in the Presence of Non-Ionic Surfactants. Processes 2022, 10, 2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112176.
Contribution 1 explored the catalytic performance of metal oxides on the low-temperature and high-temperature oxidation of heavy oil reservoir rocks. The results of the experiments showed that salt additive Na3PO4 promotes the catalytic activity of Cr2O3 and Al2O3. The authors compared the dry and wet oxidation processes and concluded that water inhibits polymerization reactions after the cracking of hydrocarbons.
Contribution 2 proposed a novel method to process heavy oil in refineries by combining steam and non-ionic surfactants. Based on their experimental results, the authors concluded that surfactants play a dominant role in dispersing asphaltene agglomerates, thereby facilitating the decomposition process under mild hydrothermal conditions and leading to a noticeable enhancement of crude oil properties.
Contribution 3 carried out a fundamental study to understand the solubility of CO2 in normal alkanes imitating crude oil. The study combined a fused silica capillary cell with Raman spectroscopy to develop the prediction model for the solubility of CO2 in n-alkanes. The output of the prediction model was matched with the experimental data, and the mean relative deviation was less than 4%, which is precise enough for CO2 EOR applications.
Contribution 4 conducted slim tube displacement experiments to calculate the minimum miscibility pressure using statistical regression and quadratic extrapolation. The estimated minimum miscibility pressure was determined to be 37.09 MPa, while the average range values for all applied methods was determined to be 36.92 MPa.
Contribution 5 is devoted to the application of a single-well chemical tracer test. In particular, the effect of the structure on the kinetic and thermodynamic components of tracers was investigated.
Contribution 6 aimed to attract scholars’ focus to the issues of the geochemical evolution of oil under geomagnetic fields. The findings showed that the geochemical characteristics of oil were changed under electromagnetic exposure, while the number of paramagnetic centers remained constant.
Contribution 7 proposed a hybrid CO2-assisted hydrothermal upgrading of heavy oil in-place. For the first time, in this Special Issue, a novel approach to reduce carbon dioxide emissions during steam-based oil recovery techniques via in situ catalytic hydrogenation processes was proposed and published. The role of the catalysts in the conversion of CO2 into normal alkanes was demonstrated.
Contribution 8 also aimed to modify the conventional hydrothermal upgrading with the co-addition of surfactants. The experimental results showed that surfactants lead to the in-depth destructive hydrogenation of the high-molecular components of heavy oil such as resins and asphaltenes.
In general, the contributions highlighted the importance of the neglected area in both downstream and upstream processes, and the relevance of global energy transition from conventional high-energy-consuming thermal recovery and upgrading methods toward hybrid-enhanced oil recovery and upgrading techniques. We hope that this Special Issue will be helpful in solving the previously mentioned difficulties in the petroleum industry. Furthermore, the contributions have raised many questions that warrant further investigation and provide an impetus for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.N.; writing—original draft preparation, F.A.; supervision, D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This project received support from The Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under agreement No. 075-15-2022-299 within the framework of the development program for a world-class Research Center “Efficient development of the global liquid hydrocarbon reserves”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martínez-Palou, R.; de Lourdes Mosqueira, M.; Zapata-Rendón, B.; Mar-Juárez, E.; Bernal-Huicochea, C.; de la Cruz Clavel-López, J.; Aburto, J. Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy crude oil by pipeline: A review. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2011, 75, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Z.; Xu, B.; Li, Y.; Pu, W.; Zhao, J. A review of in situ upgrading technology for heavy crude oil. Petroleum 2021, 7, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aliev, F.; Ali Akhunov, A.; Mirzaev, O.; Vakhin, A. Development of New Amphiphilic Catalytic Steam Additives for Hydrothermal Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques. Catalysts 2022, 12, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hashemi, R.; Nassar, N.N.; Almao, P.P. Nanoparticle technology for heavy oil in-situ upgrading and recovery enhancement: Opportunities and challenges. Appl. Energy 2014, 133, 374–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marafi, A.; Albazzaz, H.; Rana, M.S. Hydroprocessing of heavy residual oil: Opportunities and challenges. Catal. Today 2019, 329, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Santos, R.G.D.; Loh, W.; Bannwart, A.C.; Trevisan, O.V. An overview of heavy oil properties and its recovery and transportation methods. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 31, 571–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Carolin, C.F.; Kumar, P.S.; Saravanan, A.; Joshiba, G.J.; Naushad, M. Efficient techniques for the removal of toxic heavy metals from aquatic environment: A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2782–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thomas, S. Enhanced oil recovery—An overview. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.-Rev. L’IFP 2008, 63, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aliev, F.; Nurgaliev, D. In-Situ and Ex-Situ Processes during Production, Transportation and Refinery of Heavy Oil. Processes 2024, 12, 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020273

AMA Style

Aliev F, Nurgaliev D. In-Situ and Ex-Situ Processes during Production, Transportation and Refinery of Heavy Oil. Processes. 2024; 12(2):273. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aliev, Firdavs, and Danis Nurgaliev. 2024. "In-Situ and Ex-Situ Processes during Production, Transportation and Refinery of Heavy Oil" Processes 12, no. 2: 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020273

APA Style

Aliev, F., & Nurgaliev, D. (2024). In-Situ and Ex-Situ Processes during Production, Transportation and Refinery of Heavy Oil. Processes, 12(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop