Next Article in Journal
Recovery of High-Value Compounds from Yarrowia lipolytica IMUFRJ 50682 Using Autolysis and Acid Hydrolysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Geological Controls on Gas Content of Deep Coal Reservoir in the Jiaxian Area, Ordos Basin, China
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of Bubble Behavior Characteristics in a Rolling Fluidized Bed with the Addition of Longitudinal Internal Members
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Deep Coalbed Methane Potential and Prediction of Favorable Areas within the Yulin Area, Ordos Basin, Based on a Multi-Level Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in Anthracite Pores: Molecular Dynamics Simulation

China National Offshore Oil Corporation Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(6), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061131
Submission received: 7 May 2024 / Revised: 28 May 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 30 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)

Abstract

:
CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) has been demonstrated as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that enhances the production of coalbed methane (CBM) while achieving the goal of CO2 sequestration. In this paper, the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation is used to investigate the dynamic mechanism of CO2-ECBM in anthracite pores. First, an anthracite pore containing both organic and inorganic matter was constructed, and the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in the coal pores under different temperature and pressure conditions were studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The results indicate that the interaction energy of coal molecules with CO2 and CH4 is positively associated with pressure but negatively associated with temperature. At 307.15 K and 101.35 kPa, the interaction energies of coal adsorption of single-component CO2 and CH4 are −1273.92 kJ·mol−1 and −761.53 kJ·mol−1, respectively. The interaction energy between anthracite molecules and CO2 is significantly higher compared to CH4, indicating that coal has a greater adsorption capacity for CO2 than for CH4. Furthermore, the distribution characteristics of gas in the pores before and after injection indicate that CO2 mainly adsorbs and displaces CH4 by occupying adsorption sites. Under identical conditions, the diffusion coefficient of CH4 surpasses that of CO2. Additionally, the growth rate of the CH4 diffusion coefficient as the temperature increases is higher than that of CO2, which indicates that CO2-ECBM is applicable to high-temperature coal seams. The presence of oxygen functional groups in anthracite molecules greatly influences the distribution of gas molecules within the pores of coal. The hydroxyl group significantly influences the adsorption of both CH4 and CO2, while the ether group has a propensity to impact CH4 adsorption, and the carbonyl group is inclined to influence CO2 adsorption. The research findings are expected to provide technical support for the effective promotion of CO2-ECBM technology.

1. Introduction

Coalbed methane (CBM) represents a significant non-traditional source of natural gas and contains predominantly CH4 with small quantities of CO2, N2, and other gases [1,2,3]. China has rich CBM resources in high-rank coal, with a total resource base of 30.05 trillion cubic meters, but most gas wells have low production, generally at medium and low levels [4]. CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) has been proven to be an efficient technique for enhancing CBM recovery by taking advantage of the high adsorption capacity of CO2 to desorb CH4 without significantly reducing the seam pressure [5,6,7,8,9]. CO2-ECBM technology can not only greatly improve the recovery of CBM but also effectively replace CH4 with CO2 in the coal seam so as to achieve the effect of geological sequestration of CO2. This is an important direction for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology and has essential practical significance for promoting the realization of “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” [10,11].
The interaction mechanism and transport mechanism between fluids are the core issues of CO2-ECBM [12]. To date, conventional experimental methods combined with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) testing and computerized tomography (CT) analysis have been used to study the adsorption and transport characteristics of gas in the CO2-ECBM process. In addition, a theoretical model has been developed through traditional fluid dynamics analysis to study the dynamic process of gas adsorption, diffusion, and gas transport. Zheng et al. studied the dynamic characteristics of multiphase CH4 in the CO2-ECBM process by using the NMR method and confirmed that the desorption efficiency of CH4 was significantly improved after injecting CO2 [13]. Dutka et al. conducted a CO2-ECBM physical simulation experiment, which showed that injecting CO2 has the potential to enhance the recovery of CBM [14]. Majewska et al. experimentally observed that bituminous coal had a higher affinity for CH4 than for CO2 at 2.6 MPa and a similar affinity at 4 MPa, indicating that CO2 was not always preferentially adsorbed by coal [15]. Topolnicki et al. developed a mathematical framework to characterize CO2-ECBM, and the model’s computed outcomes closely aligned with empirical findings [16]. Due to the intricate nature of CO2-ECBM, encompassing processes such as gas adsorption, desorption, diffusion, and seepage, there are interdependencies between different stages that pose challenges in comprehensively elucidating the flow characteristics and transport mechanisms of gas molecules using conventional methodologies [17,18].
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation represents a novel computational experimental methodology distinguished by its cost-effectiveness, minimal risk, and capacity for microscopic analysis [19,20,21,22,23]. MD simulations have widespread applications in the fields of materials and thermal analysis. Mahjoory et al. conducted research on enhancing the mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cement (CPC) for bone regeneration by incorporating Mg nanoparticles (NPs). Their findings indicated that the initial temperature and percentage of NPs have an impact on the mechanical performance of CPC [24]. Shahgholi et al. utilized MD simulations to examine the thermal and mechanical characteristics of Mg NPs in enhancing CPC, revealing a significant enhancement in the mechanical performance of the final cement due to the quantity and size of magnesium NPs [25]. In addition to the above fields, MD simulations are also well suited for investigating the flow behavior of gas molecules. To date, many scholars have carried out related research on the CO2-ECBM process by using MD simulations. Brochard et al. conducted MD simulations of CO2 and CH4 adsorption processes at different reservoir depths using a coal molecular model and found that CH4 adsorption increased with depth, while CO2 adsorption decreased slightly [26]. Gao et al. conducted molecular simulations on gas adsorption and diffusion in the micropores of coal and found that for multi-component adsorption, CO2 had a significant advantage but was significantly affected by H2O [27]. Long et al. conducted further research on the CO2-ECBM process in different pore diameters and found that as the pore diameter increased, the gas adsorption capacity also increased. They also noted that CO2 had a higher adsorption capacity than CH4, while CH4 exhibited better diffusion ability compared to CO2 [28]. In the current CO2-ECBM molecular simulation, the pore models constructed are mainly single organic pores or single inorganic mineral pores, which are used to study the adsorption and transport characteristics of gas. However, in real CBM pores, most of the gas is adsorbed on organic and inorganic minerals, except for some free gases. The analysis of a certain type of pore alone cannot fully reveal the transport mechanism of CO2-ECBM fluid at the microscale. In other fields, researchers have initiated the development of composite pore structures that integrate organic compounds and inorganic minerals to more accurately replicate reservoir properties. This facilitates a visual comparison of how organic and inorganic compositions influence gas storage, distribution, and flow characteristics under identical conditions. Tao et al. utilized methyl naphthalene as a representation of the organic component and formed the composite pore structure of illite–methyl naphthalene [29]. Kim et al. referenced kerogen macromolecules in their description of asphaltene and resin components and developed a shale model consisting of a combination of kerogen and illite. The established composite system has been verified to be highly rational [30]. At present, the use of MD simulations of composite pores in CBM reservoirs is still at an early stage, and there is a shortage of MD simulation research in this area.
In this study, the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation was used to study the dynamic mechanism of the CO2 displacement of CBM in anthracite pores. A kind of anthracite pore containing organic and inorganic materials was constructed, and the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in the anthracite pore under different temperature and pressure conditions were studied by MD simulation, which provides theoretical support for the efficient development of CO2-ECBM.

2. Simulation Method

2.1. Molecular Model

Since CH4 is the main component of CBM, we use it to represent CBM. In this paper, the molecular model of anthracite established by Xiang is selected to study the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in coal pores [31]. The molecular formula of the model is C199H148N2O9. A series of energy minimization simulations were conducted on the planar configuration of coal macromolecules, and a stable three-dimensional configuration was obtained. The simulation processes included geometric optimization, annealing treatment, and dynamic relaxation. Figure 1 is the molecular model of anthracite.

2.2. Model Basis and Conditional Configuration

We assembled a simulation box comprising two inorganic layers and one organic layer (refer to Figure 2). Montmorillonite slices are used to represent the inorganic layer, while the anthracite molecules are used to represent the organic layer. The structural information of the montmorillonite slices was retrieved from the Cambridge Crystallography Data Centre (CCDC) database. First, two montmorillonite slices are arranged as depicted in Figure 2, followed by the absorption of a set of coal molecules into the interlayer space. In three-dimensional space, periodic boundary conditions are employed with a unit size of 41.4 Å × 35.8 Å × 30.5 Å, and each unit contains 4280 atoms. In our simulation, the coal pore model, which consists of both organic and inorganic matter, is considered a rigid atomic material. The simulation calculation was conducted using Material Studio visual software (latest v. 2023), with the adoption of the COMPASS II force field and medium geometric optimization method. The charge calculation process utilized the force field distribution algorithm, while the atom-based method was employed for the summation of electrostatic forces and van der Waals forces. Following molecular mechanics optimization, the model was subjected to local energy minimization and subsequently globally optimized through a dynamic annealing simulation to achieve global energy minimization.
The initial model had a density of 1.23 g/cm3, which is consistent with the density range of anthracite reported in the literature, which ranges from approximately 1.2 to 1.3 g/cm3. Using the Atom Volumes & Surfaces tool in MS, the pore volume of the model was calculated to be 0.00118 cm3/g. The calculated pore volume of the model also agrees with the experimental results obtained on the anthracite sample. The physical parameters of our established coalbed methane composite porosity model closely approximate those of the actual model. The primary advantage of this model lies in its comprehensive consideration of the chemical composition of real anthracite, enabling a thorough reflection of the physical and chemical properties of anthracite pores, a characteristic lacking in previous studies related to coalbed methane MD simulations.
The specific simulation process is as follows: First, CH4 molecules are adsorbed to the established pore model, then a small number of CO2 molecules are injected into the model, and once the process reaches equilibrium, the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in the coal pore model are calculated by analyzing the composition and energy changes in the gas mixture. In the actual CO2-ECBM process, the adsorption of CH4 is physical adsorption, while the adsorption of CO2 is mainly physical adsorption with weak chemical adsorption. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the adsorption referred to in this article during the MD simulation process is exclusively physical adsorption. Dynamic calculations were performed on the model using the Focite and Sorption module, and the optimization process involved the use of the NVT system. The Focite module parameters were set with dynamics as the task item, temperature ranging from 297.15 K to 327.15 K, and Nose for temperature control and Berendsen for pressure control methods. The total step number is 10,000, the time step is 1 fs, and the simulation time is 50 ps. Table 1 provides specific information about the simulation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Interaction Energy and Adsorption Capacity

The adsorption of gases by solid surfaces is due to the tendency of any surface to spontaneously decrease its energy. The interaction energy between the adsorbent and adsorbate is defined as the sum of van der Waals interactions and Coulomb interactions, and its expression is shown in Equation (1) [32].
E = 4 ε σ r 12 σ r 6 + C q i q j ε r
where q i and q j are the charges of the atoms; r is the distance between the interacting particles; C is the energy conversion constant; ɛ is the depth of the potential energy well; and σ is the distance between two molecules at which the interaction potential energy is zero.
To analyze molecular interactions, we calculated the van der Waals and Coulomb interactions of coal with CO2 and CH4. Figure 3 shows the van der Waals interactions, Coulomb interactions, and interaction energies of CO2 and CH4 adsorbed to coal at different temperatures. With the increase in temperature, the values of van der Waals and Coulomb actions decrease, and both van der Waals and Coulomb interactions are negative, indicating that this physical adsorption process mainly relies on van der Waals forces and electrostatic forces, and the greater the absolute value is, the stronger the force is. With the increase in temperature in the simulation range, the absolute value of interaction energy decreases, and the adsorption effect weakens. High temperatures will inhibit physical adsorption. The interaction energy increases with the increase in pressure, and the adsorption effect is enhanced. With the increase in temperature (297.15 K to 307.15 K), the change in van der Waals interactions after CO2 adsorption is 143.29 kJ·mol−1, and the change in Coulomb interactions is 52.62 kJ·mol−1; the change in van der Waals interactions after CH4 adsorption is 109.96 kJ·mol−1, and the change in Coulomb interactions is 26.09 kJ·mol−1, which indicates that the adsorption of CO2 and CH4 is still dominated by van der Waals forces, and the Coulomb force is weak. At 307.15 K and 101.35 kPa, the interaction energies of coal adsorption of single-component CO2 and CH4 are −1273.92 kJ·mol−1 and −761.53 kJ·mol−1, respectively. The interaction energy between CO2 and coal is absolutely dominant, indicating that the adsorption capacity of coal to CO2 is greater than that to CH4. CH4 molecules, being nonpolar in nature, exhibited variation in van der Waals energy of 384.3 kJ·mol−1 post-adsorption, alongside minimal alteration in electrostatic Coulombic energy, signifying the predominant involvement of van der Waals forces in the adsorption process. The CO2 molecule possesses a significant electric quadrupole moment, resulting in an adsorption-induced alteration of 143.6 kJ·mol−1 in electrostatic Coulomb energy and a van der Waals interaction energy changing from −769.5 kJ·mol−1 to −1137.2 kJ·mol−1 (101.35 kPa, 297.15 K). Consequently, the adsorption of CO2 continues to be primarily governed by van der Waals forces, with a subtle electrostatic interaction. Therefore, unless the research aim is to scrutinize the chemical adsorption process, the impact of chemical adsorption can typically be disregarded in MD simulations of CO2-ECBM.
The isothermal adsorption characteristics of CO2 and CH4 at different temperatures were analyzed. Figure 4 shows the isothermal adsorption curves of CO2 and CH4. The results show that at the same temperature, with the increase in pressure at the early stage, the gas molecules in the vacuum state can be quickly adsorbed by coal molecules, showing a faster adsorption rate. When the high-affinity adsorption sites become occupied, the gas molecules shift to adsorption at low-affinity sites, exhibiting a reduced rate of adsorption. With the ongoing injection of gas, the process eventually reaches a point of saturation, demonstrating a gradual rate of adsorption. When the temperature rises at a constant pressure, the energy of CH4 increases, leading to sharper molecular motion and a decrease in potential energy on the surface of coal pores. As a result, it becomes more difficult for CH4 molecules to be adsorbed by the coal surface, resulting in a decrease in the adsorption quantity [33]. In the same coal pore model, the adsorption levels of CO2 and CH4 are significantly different, with CO2 showing better adsorption characteristics, followed by CH4. Under the conditions of 307.15 K and 101.35 kPa, the adsorption capacity of CO2 reaches 0.577 mmol/g, while that of CH4 is only 0.186 mmol/g under the same conditions. Therefore, in coal pores, CO2 has a stronger adsorption capacity than CH4, which means that it can displace CH4 from coal and accelerate CH4 desorption. The gas adsorption capacity obtained in this study exceeds that reported in the previous literature [34], primarily due to the incorporation of inorganic constituents within the established porous model of anthracite. The presence of inorganic matter can enhance coal’s capacity for CH4 adsorption without fundamentally altering its adsorption characteristics. Further investigation is required to determine whether a synergistic adsorption effect exists between the organic and inorganic components within this composite structure.
The distribution characteristics of CH4 and CO2 in the pore model were further studied, and the results are shown in Figure 5. The data in the figure are the density distributions of CH4 and CO2 along the z-axis at the equilibrium of the system measured after CO2 was injected into the pore model. The density distributions shown are the average density calculated within 1000 time steps after equilibrium. Before CO2 is injected, most CH4 is mainly adsorbed on coal molecules, and some of it is adsorbed on the surface of the clay mineral layer. After CO2 is injected, the density of CH4 on the coal molecular layer decreases, and the density of CO2 increases, indicating that CO2 achieves the displacement effect mainly by occupying the adsorption sites of CH4, which is consistent with the analysis results of interaction energy and isothermal adsorption curves. Figure 6 is a schematic diagram of this process.

3.2. Effect of Chemical Functional Groups on Gas Adsorption

In order to further elucidate the adsorption mechanism of gas in the pores of anthracite, the influence of different chemical functional groups on gas adsorption in anthracite was studied. The main functional groups of anthracite are ether, hydroxyl, carbonyl, a benzene ring, and other hydrocarbons and oxygen-containing functional groups. In addition, the influence of oxygen atoms in inorganic matter on gas adsorption is also taken into consideration. The radial distribution function (RDF) is used to represent the extent of the functional group’s adsorption of gases. The RDF is a physical quantity characterizing the microstructural characteristics of particles. The RDF can not only be used to describe the order of matter but also be used to study the correlation of electrons, which can indicate the features of particle clustering and can be understood as the ratio of the local density to the average volume density in the system. The RDF is an important indicator for measuring the strength of adsorption of specific atoms or functional groups in the large molecules of adsorbents for adsorbate molecules. The size of the peak value of the RDF curve reflects the strength of the interaction between the target particles, and its calculation expression is as follows [35]:
g a b r = d N 4 π ρ b r 2 d r
where d N is the number of b particles, and ρ b is the density of b particles.
Figure 7 and Figure 8 are the RDFs of the main functional groups in coal with CH4 and CO2, respectively. CH4 and an ether group, a hydroxyl group, carbonyl, a benzene ring, and montmorillonite-oxygen (oxygen atom in montmorillonite), respectively, form obvious main peaks at 0.2624 nm, 0.3050 nm, 0.3015 nm, 0.3608 nm, and 0.4276 nm, and the order of the peak values from high to low is as follows: the ether group (2.97), the hydroxyl group (1.99), montmorillonite-oxygen (1.28), carbonyl (1.25), and the benzene ring (1.24). The main peak of CO2 with the hydroxyl group, carbonyl, the benzene ring, and montmorillonite-oxygen is formed at 0.2925 nm, 0.4292 nm, 0.2785 nm, and 0.3574 nm, respectively, and the corresponding peak values are 2.19, 2.01, 1.36, and 1.31. At the same time, the main RDF peak of CO2 and the ether group presented a double-peak phenomenon, and the peak values of CO2 and the ether group are 1.52 and 1.29 at 0.3618 nm and 0.4977 nm, respectively, which promoted the strong interaction between CO2 and oxygen-containing functional groups. The oxygen atoms on montmorillonite form a weak adsorption layer with CO2 at a relatively far distance, so the adsorption is the weakest.
The presence of chemical functional groups such as carbonyl and benzene rings provides CO2 with a rich array of adsorption sites, but they have a weaker affinity for CH4. The hydroxyl group has a strong affinity for both gases. Although the ether group has a strong affinity for CH4, its quantity is small, so its impact on the final adsorption effect is limited. In general, the presence of oxygen functional groups and aromatic hydrocarbons in anthracite coal facilitates the adsorption of gas molecules on the coal surface. Hydroxyl and ether groups play a crucial role in the adsorption of CH4, whereas carbonyl and benzene rings are influential in the adsorption of CO2.

3.3. Gas Diffusivity Capacity

The analysis of Mean Square Displacement (MSD) is a method employed to investigate the temporal movement patterns of particles, offering valuable insights into their modes of diffusion, active transportation, or immobilization. Furthermore, MSD analysis has the capability to offer approximations of motion characteristics, such as the diffusion coefficients of particles undergoing free diffusion. The gas diffusion behavior within the pore is directly correlated with the root MSD of its molecular centroid. By using Einstein’s equation, the MSD curve can be obtained. The formula of Einstein’s equation is as follows [36]:
M S D = r i t r i 0 2
where r i t and r i 0 refer to the corresponding position vectors of the i-th atom at t and zero, respectively.
The slope k is obtained by the linear regression of the MSD curve. The calculation formula of the diffusion coefficient can be simplified as follows:
D = 1 6 N lim t d d t i = 1 N r i t r i 0 2
where D is the self-diffusion coefficient, m2/s; N is the number of diffusing molecules.
The diffusion coefficient is frequently employed as a physical parameter for describing the behavior of gas migration within a medium. Based on Equation (4), it is possible to calculate the gas diffusion coefficient in the pore at various temperatures. Figure 9 and Figure 10 quantitatively characterize the diffusion laws of CH4 and CO2 in the coal pore model, and the fitting coefficients of the curves are both high, which ensures the accuracy of the calculated diffusion coefficient. The results show that the MSD of CO2 and CH4 in the pore model increases with time, and the MSD of gases increases with temperature. With the increase in temperature, the diffusion coefficient of a gas increases, and the internal molecular energy increases. Based on the law of energy preservation, the internal molecular energy will transform into dynamic energy, leading to an increase in molecular movement [37]. Consequently, with the rise in temperature, there is a corresponding increase in the rate of gas diffusion, facilitating its escape from the coal seam. In this study, with the increase in temperature, the growth rates of the CO2 and CH4 diffusion coefficients are different. The growth rates of CO2 diffusion coefficients at different temperatures are 11.54% (297.15 K–307.15 K), 25.86% (307.15 K–317.15 K), and 12.33% (317.15 K–327.15 K); the growth rates of CH4 diffusion coefficients are 34.09% (297.15 K–307.15 K), 29.26% (307.15 K–317.15 K), and 24.98% (317.15 K–327.15 K).
The literature reports that the diffusion coefficients for CH4 and CO2 are approximately within the ranges of 10−11–10−9 m2/s [38] and 10−10–10−9 m2/s [39], respectively. In this study, the diffusion coefficient range of CO2 is 0.156 × 10−9–0.246 × 10−9 m2/s, and the diffusion coefficient range of CH4 is 0.769 × 10−9–2.135 × 10−9 m2/s, which are consistent with the reference ranges. The diffusion coefficient of CO2 is smaller than that of CH4 under the same conditions of the two gases, because CH4 is a tetrahedral molecule, and the diffusion process in the pore is much less influenced by the coal molecular structure compared to rod-shaped CO2. Furthermore, the strong adsorption of coal molecules is attributed to the large molecular size of CO2, leading to an increased likelihood of collision with and adsorption on the pore wall, ultimately resulting in diminished diffusion efficacy within the pore. This characteristic allows CH4 to diffuse into the fracture more easily than CO2 after desorption, effectively increasing the recovery of CO2-ECBM.

4. Conclusions

In previous CO2-ECBM molecular simulation studies, the pore models constructed were mainly of single organic pores. Therefore, this study is the first to construct a composite pore model of anthracite that includes both organic and inorganic materials. The adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CH4 and CO2 in the composite pore of anthracite were studied using MD simulation. The research results are as follows:
  • The interaction between coal molecules and CO2 and CH4 increases with the increase in pressure, and the adsorption effect is enhanced. Under the same conditions, the adsorption of CO2 and CH4 is still dominated by van der Waals forces, and the electrostatic interaction is weak. At 307.15 K and 101.35 kPa, the interaction energies of coal adsorption of single-component CO2 and CH4 are −1273.92 and −761.53 kJ·mol−1, respectively.
  • The interaction energy between anthracite molecules and CO2 is significantly higher compared to CH4, indicating that coal has a greater adsorption capacity for CO2 than for CH4. The distribution characteristics of gas in the pores before and after injection indicate that CO2 mainly adsorbs and displaces CH4 by occupying adsorption sites.
  • Under the same conditions, the diffusivity of CH4 exceeds that of CO2; elevated temperatures result in an increase in gas diffusivity, facilitating the diffusion of gas out of the coal pores. With the increase in temperature, the growth rates of CO2 and CH4 diffusion coefficients are different, and the growth rate of the CH4 diffusion coefficient is greater than that of CO2. This shows that CO2-ECBM is suitable for coal seams with high temperatures.
  • The presence of oxygen functional groups and aromatic hydrocarbons in anthracite coal facilitates the adsorption of gas molecules on the coal surface. The hydroxyl group significantly influences the adsorption of both CH4 and CO2, and of the other functional groups, the ethoxy group has the greatest impact on the adsorption of CH4, while the carbonyl group has a significant impact on the adsorption of CO2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G.; Methodology, Y.G. and Y.W.; Validation, Y.W.; Investigation, X.C.; Writing—original draft, Y.G., Y.W. and X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to thank the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M733916) for their assistance in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to confidentiality issues.

Acknowledgments

The authors also acknowledge the invaluable insights provided by the anonymous reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Yufei Gao, Yaqing Wang and Xiaolong Chen were employed by the company China National Offshore Oil Corporation Research Institute Co., Ltd. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moore, T.A. Coalbed methane: A review. Int. J. CoalGeol. 2012, 101, 36–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ying, L.M.; Chen, J.; Du, C.; Pang, L.X.; Wen, Y.J. The research progress of coal and gas co-mining. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 524, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wen, G.C.; Sun, H.T.; Li, R.F.; Fu, J.; Zhao, X.S. Assessment method and application of coalbed methane resources in coal mining stability area. J. China Coal Soc. 2018, 43, 160–167. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Chen, F.; Wang, M. Multiscale Model for Hydrogen Transport and Storage in Shale Reservoirs. SPE J. 2024, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kong, D.; Gao, J.; Lian, P.; Zheng, R.; Zhu, W.; Xu, Y. Characteristics of gas-oil contact and mobilization limit during gas-assisted gravity drainage process. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2022, 6, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huo, B.; Jing, X.; Fan, C.; Han, Y. Numerical investigation of flue gas injection enhanced underground coal seam gas drainage. Energy Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 3204–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, C.; Elsworth, D.; Li, S.; Chen, Z.; Luo, M.; Song, Y.; Zhang, H. Modelling and optimization of enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO2/N2 mixtures. Fuel 2019, 253, 1114–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.W.; Dai, Z.X.; Wang, G.S.; Chen, L.; Xia, Y.Z.; Zhou, Y.H. A hybrid physics-informed data-driven neural network for CO2 storage in depleted shale reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 2024, 21, 286–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ranathunga, A.S.; Perera, M.S.A.; Ranjith, P.G.; Wei, C.H. An experimental investigation of applicability of CO2 enhanced coal bed methane recovery to low rank coal. Fuel 2017, 189, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kong, D.; Gao, Y.; Sarma, H.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhu, W. Experimental investigation of immiscible water-alternating-gas injection in ultra-high water-cut stage reservoir. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2021, 5, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Dai, Z.; Chen, L.; Shen, X.; Chen, F.; Soltanian, M.R. An integrated multi-scale model for CO2 transport and storage in shale reservoirs. Appl. Energy 2023, 331, 120444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pini, R.; Ottiger, S.; Storti, G.; Mazzotti, M. Pure and competitive adsorption of CO2, CH4 and N2 on coal for ECBM. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1705–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, S.; Yao, Y.; Sang, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, M.; Liu, S. Dynamic characterization of multiphase methane during CO2-ECBM: An NMR relaxation method. Fuel 2022, 324, 124526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dutka, B.; Kudasik, M.; Topolnicki, J. Pore pressure changes accompanying exchange sorption of CO2/CH4 in a coal briquette. Fuel Process. Technol. 2012, 100, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Majewska, Z.; Ceglarska-Stefańska, G.; Majewski, S.; Ziętek, J. Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2009, 77, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Topolnicki, J.; Kudasik, M.; Dutka, B. Simplified model of the CO2/CH4 exchange sorption process. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 113, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pini, R.; Ottiger, S.; Burlini, L.; Storti, G.; Mazzotti, M. CO2 storage through ECBM recovery: An experimental and modeling study. Energy Procedia 2009, 1, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sander, R.; Connell, L.D.; Pan, Z.; Camilleri, M.; Heryanto, D.; Lupton, N. Core flooding experiments of CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 131, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, W.; Feng, Q.; Jin, Z.; Xing, X.; Wang, S. Molecular simulation study of oil-water two-phase fluid transport in shale inorganic nanopores. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 245, 116948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Chen, L.; Qu, Z.; Yin, Y.; Kang, Q.; Yu, B.; Tao, W.Q. Modeling of multi-scale transport phenomena in shale gas production—A critical review. Appl. Energy 2020, 262, 114575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Lu, X.; Xu, J.; Sang, P.; Guo, S.; Zhu, H.; Guo, W. Molecular simulation of CO2/CH4 adsorption in brown coal: Effect of oxygen-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-containing functional groups. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, J.; Greenkorn, R.A.; Chao, K.C. Monte Carlo simulation of the grand canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 1982, 46, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Papadopoulou, A.; Becker, E.D.; Lupkowski, M.; van Swol, F. Molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations in the grand canonical ensemble: Local versus global control. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 4897–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mahjoory, M.; Shahgholi, M.; Karimipour, A. The effects of initial temperature and pressure on the mechanical properties of reinforced calcium phosphate cement with magnesium nanoparticles: A molecular dynamics approach. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2022, 135, 106067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mahjoory, M.; Shahgholi, M.; Karimipour, A. Investigation on the size and percentage effects of magnesium nanoparticles on thermophysical properties of reinforced calcium phosphate bone cement by molecular dynamic simulation. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brochard, L.; Vandamme, M.; Pellenq, R.J.M.; Fen-Chong, T. Adsorption-induced deformation of microporous materials: Coal swelling induced by CO2–CH4 competitive adsorption. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2659–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, D.; Hong, L.; Wang, J.; Zheng, D. Molecular simulation of gas adsorption characteristics and diffusion in micropores of lignite. Fuel 2020, 269, 117443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Long, H.; Lin, H.F.; Yan, M.; Bai, Y.; Tong, X.; Kong, X.G.; Li, S.G. Adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CH4, CO2, and N2 in micropores and mesopores of bituminous coal: Molecular dynamics. Fuel 2021, 292, 120268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tao, T.; Wang, S.; Qu, Y.; Cao, D. Displacement of shale gas confined in illite shale by flue gas: A molecular simulation study. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 29, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, C.; Devegowda, D. Molecular dynamics study of fluid-fluid and solid-fluid interactions in mixed-wet shale pores. Fuel 2022, 319, 123587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiang, J.H.; Zeng, F.G.; Bin, L.I.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.F.; Liang, H.Z. Construction of macromolecular structural model of anthracite from Chengzhuang coal mine and its molecular simulation. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2013, 41, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jones, J.E. On the determination of molecular fields—II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Contain. Pap. A Math. Phys. Character 1924, 106, 463–477. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bai, Y.; Lin, H.F.; Li, S.G.; Yan, M.; Long, H. Molecular simulation of N2 and CO2 injection into a coal model containing adsorbed methane at different temperatures. Energy 2021, 219, 119686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jing, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, J.; Yin, Y. Methane Adsorption in Anthracite Coal under Different Pressures and Temperatures—A Study Combining Isothermal Adsorption and Molecular Simulation. Geofluids 2023, 2023, 8528359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Park, S.; Sposito, G. Monte Carlo simulation of total radial distribution functions for interlayer water in Li-, Na-, and K-montmorillonite hydrates. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 4642–4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, X.; Liu, Q.; Cui, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, M. Molecular simulation and experimental study on propylene dehumidification through a PVA–PAA blend membrane. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16687–16696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, X.Q.; He, X.; Qiu, N.X.; Yang, X.; Tian, Z.Y.; Li, M.J.; Xue, Y. Molecular simulation of CH4, CO2, H2O and N2 molecules adsorption on heterogeneous surface models of coal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, H.; Tang, D.; Zhao, J.; Li, S.; Tao, S. A new laboratory method for accurate measurement of the methane diffusion coefficient and its influencing factors in the coal matrix. Fuel 2015, 158, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saghafi, A.; Faiz, M.; Roberts, D. CO2 storage and gas diffusivity properties of coals from Sydney Basin, Australia. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2007, 70, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The molecular model of anthracite.
Figure 1. The molecular model of anthracite.
Processes 12 01131 g001
Figure 2. Molecular pore model of anthracite.
Figure 2. Molecular pore model of anthracite.
Processes 12 01131 g002
Figure 3. The interaction energy of coal with CO2 and CH4.
Figure 3. The interaction energy of coal with CO2 and CH4.
Processes 12 01131 g003
Figure 4. Isothermal adsorption curves of CO2 and CH4.
Figure 4. Isothermal adsorption curves of CO2 and CH4.
Processes 12 01131 g004
Figure 5. Density distribution of CH4 and CO2 in pore model.
Figure 5. Density distribution of CH4 and CO2 in pore model.
Processes 12 01131 g005
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of process of CO2 adsorption displacement of CH4.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram of process of CO2 adsorption displacement of CH4.
Processes 12 01131 g006
Figure 7. RDF of CH4 and surface functional groups on coal.
Figure 7. RDF of CH4 and surface functional groups on coal.
Processes 12 01131 g007
Figure 8. RDF of CO2 and surface functional groups on coal.
Figure 8. RDF of CO2 and surface functional groups on coal.
Processes 12 01131 g008
Figure 9. MSD of CH4 and CO2 in coal pore model.
Figure 9. MSD of CH4 and CO2 in coal pore model.
Processes 12 01131 g009
Figure 10. Diffusion coefficients of CH4 and CO2 in coal pore model.
Figure 10. Diffusion coefficients of CH4 and CO2 in coal pore model.
Processes 12 01131 g010
Table 1. MD simulation setting information.
Table 1. MD simulation setting information.
SettingParameterSettingParameter
ForcefieldCOMPASSIICutoff distance12.5 Å
ChargesForcefield assignedEnsembleNVT
QualityMediumTemperature control methodNose
ElectrostaticEwaldPressure control methodBerendsen
Van der WaalsAtom-basedSimulation time50 ps
Ewald accuracy0.001 kcal/molTime step1 fs
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X. Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in Anthracite Pores: Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Processes 2024, 12, 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061131

AMA Style

Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen X. Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in Anthracite Pores: Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Processes. 2024; 12(6):1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Yufei, Yaqing Wang, and Xiaolong Chen. 2024. "Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in Anthracite Pores: Molecular Dynamics Simulation" Processes 12, no. 6: 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop