Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice

A special issue of Processes (ISSN 2227-9717). This special issue belongs to the section "Energy Systems".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2024 | Viewed by 4063

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Interests: discrete element fluid dynamics; plugging mechanics; drilling fluid

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
State Key Laboratory for Fine Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Interests: microseismic monitoring; seismic imaging; geophysical instrument development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Interests: fluid flow in porous media; CO2 geological storage and utilization; ehanced oil and gas recovery

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor Assistant
School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Interests: hydraulic fracturing; rock mechanics; CO2 geological storage

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Energy and fuel are important supports for the modern economy, representing an important foundation for the survival and development of human society and playing an indispensable role in promoting economic and social development. However, energy consumption has increased substantially, and traditional energy resources have been declining. At present, the contradiction between the increasing shortage of traditional petrochemical energy and the strong demand for energy from economic development is acute. Therefore, unconventional energy such as shale gas, shale oil, and coalbed methane are important parts of realizing a modern multi-energy system with huge reserves. To further explore new theories and methods for the efficient exploration and development of shale gas, shale oil, and coalbed methane, this Special Issue will showcase the latest research to assist in the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas resources.

This Special Issue, entitled “Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice”, aims to cover novel advances in the above research topic.

Suitable topics include but are not limited to:

  • Shale gas exploration and development;
  • Coalbed methane exploration and development;
  • Shale oil exploration and development;
  • Microseismic monitoring;
  • Drilling fluid, completion fluid, fracturing fluid;
  • Hydraulic fracturing;
  • Theory and methods about wellbore stability;
  • Unconventional oil and gas development driven by artificial intelligence.

Dr. Xianyu Yang
Prof. Dr. Jing Zheng
Dr. Debin Kong
Guest Editors

Dr. Jingyu Xie
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Processes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • shale gas
  • coalbed methane
  • shale oil
  • drilling fluid and fracturing fluid
  • microseismic monitoring
  • experiments and numerical simulations
  • artificial intelligence and machine learning

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 6115 KiB  
Article
Research and Application of Treatment Measures for Low-Yield and Low-Efficiency Coalbed Methane Wells in Qinshui Basin
by Lichun Sun, Zhigang Zhao, Chen Li, Ruyong Feng, Yanjun Meng and Yong Li
Processes 2024, 12(7), 1381; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071381 - 2 Jul 2024
Viewed by 589
Abstract
China is rich in high-grade coalbed methane resources, accounting for one-third of the total amount of coalbed methane resources. Qinshui Basin is the main high ranking coalbed methane mining basin in China. In the early stage of CBM development, low-production and low-efficiency wells [...] Read more.
China is rich in high-grade coalbed methane resources, accounting for one-third of the total amount of coalbed methane resources. Qinshui Basin is the main high ranking coalbed methane mining basin in China. In the early stage of CBM development, low-production and low-efficiency wells were formed in the process of block development because of an insufficient understanding of reservoir geological conditions. The existence of low-yield and low-efficiency wells with low output and a poor development benefit seriously restricts the efficient development of coalbed methane. In order to improve the overall development efficiency of coalbed methane fields, how to revitalize low-yield and low-efficiency wells is the main problem facing the development process of coalbed methane. With the deepening understanding of the study area geology, the formation of low-yield and low-efficiency wells has been basically identified. With the advancement of development technology, developers have the ability to retrofit some low-producing and inefficient wells. Low-production and low-efficiency wells are widely distributed. It is difficult to find the criteria for classifying low-producing and low-efficiency wells because of the great differences in geological conditions and reservoir physical properties in different blocks. In addition, the causes of a low-production and low-efficiency well are complex, as the same well is often caused by many reasons, and how to identify the causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells is difficult. In recent decades, developers have studied many methods to retrofit low-production wells, but the retrofit results are not satisfactory. How to choose an economical and efficient reservoir reconstruction method to revitalize low-production and low-efficiency wells is particularly important. This paper starts with the definition of low-production and low-efficiency wells in different blocks, combining an economic evaluation and productivity characteristics to judge whether they are low-production and low-efficiency wells, and defines the distribution of low-production and low-efficiency wells in blocks. The reasons for the formation of low-production and low-efficiency wells are analyzed with the geological characteristics, production dynamic performance, and engineering reconstruction effects. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the current relatively mature low-production and low-efficiency well treatment measures, clearly identifies the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment measures, and takes corresponding stimulation measures for different causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells. The research shows that there are 687 low-production and low-efficiency wells in block A, accounting for 69.4% of the total number of wells, and the low-production and low-efficiency wells account for a relatively large proportion; so, it is necessary to treat them. The main causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells are geology, engineering and drainage systems. The geological reason mainly refers to the low gas production of coalbed methane wells influenced by three factors: resource abundance, faults, and collapse columns. According to the different causes, three treatment measures of large-scale secondary fracturing, temporary plugging, and diversion fracturing and foam fracturing are put forward. The research method in this paper is targeted at different geological conditions so it can be used to guide the treatment of low-yield and low-efficiency wells in other CBM blocks, and it has very important significance for revitalizing the existing low-efficiency CBM assets and improving the development efficiency of CBM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 7623 KiB  
Article
Geological Controls on Gas Content of Deep Coal Reservoir in the Jiaxian Area, Ordos Basin, China
by Shaobo Xu, Qian Li, Fengrui Sun, Tingting Yin, Chao Yang, Zihao Wang, Feng Qiu, Keyu Zhou and Jiaming Chen
Processes 2024, 12(6), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061269 - 20 Jun 2024
Viewed by 375
Abstract
Deep coalbed methane (DCBM) reservoirs hold exceptional potential for diversifying energy sources. The Ordos Basin has attracted much attention due to its enormous resource reserves of DCBM. This work focuses on the Jiaxian area of the Ordos basin, and the multi-factor quantitative evaluation [...] Read more.
Deep coalbed methane (DCBM) reservoirs hold exceptional potential for diversifying energy sources. The Ordos Basin has attracted much attention due to its enormous resource reserves of DCBM. This work focuses on the Jiaxian area of the Ordos basin, and the multi-factor quantitative evaluation method on the sealing of cap rocks is established. The abundant geologic and reservoir information is synthesized to explore variable factors affecting the gas content. Results indicate that the sealing capacity of the coal seam roof in the Jiaxian area, with a mean sealing index of 3.12, surpasses the floor’s sealing capacity by 13.87%, which averages 2.74. The sealing of the coal seam roof has a more positive impact on the enrichment of coalbed methane (CBM). In addition, the conditions for preserving gas would be boosted as coal seam thickness increased, leading to enhanced gas content in coal seams. The CH4 content increases by an average of ~2.38 m3/t as coal seam thickness increases with the interval of 1 m. The increasing burial depth represents the incremental maturity of organic matter and the gas generation ability in coal seams, which contributes to improving the gas content in coal seams. There is a positive correlation between the degree of coal fragmentation and the gas content of the coal seam to a certain extent. These findings provide valuable insights for targeted drilling strategies and enhancing natural gas production capacity in the Jiaxian area of the Ordos Basin. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3994 KiB  
Article
Adsorption and Diffusion Characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in Anthracite Pores: Molecular Dynamics Simulation
by Yufei Gao, Yaqing Wang and Xiaolong Chen
Processes 2024, 12(6), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12061131 - 30 May 2024
Viewed by 286
Abstract
CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) has been demonstrated as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that enhances the production of coalbed methane (CBM) while achieving the goal of CO2 sequestration. In this paper, the grand canonical Monte [...] Read more.
CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO2-ECBM) has been demonstrated as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique that enhances the production of coalbed methane (CBM) while achieving the goal of CO2 sequestration. In this paper, the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation is used to investigate the dynamic mechanism of CO2-ECBM in anthracite pores. First, an anthracite pore containing both organic and inorganic matter was constructed, and the adsorption and diffusion characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in the coal pores under different temperature and pressure conditions were studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The results indicate that the interaction energy of coal molecules with CO2 and CH4 is positively associated with pressure but negatively associated with temperature. At 307.15 K and 101.35 kPa, the interaction energies of coal adsorption of single-component CO2 and CH4 are −1273.92 kJ·mol−1 and −761.53 kJ·mol−1, respectively. The interaction energy between anthracite molecules and CO2 is significantly higher compared to CH4, indicating that coal has a greater adsorption capacity for CO2 than for CH4. Furthermore, the distribution characteristics of gas in the pores before and after injection indicate that CO2 mainly adsorbs and displaces CH4 by occupying adsorption sites. Under identical conditions, the diffusion coefficient of CH4 surpasses that of CO2. Additionally, the growth rate of the CH4 diffusion coefficient as the temperature increases is higher than that of CO2, which indicates that CO2-ECBM is applicable to high-temperature coal seams. The presence of oxygen functional groups in anthracite molecules greatly influences the distribution of gas molecules within the pores of coal. The hydroxyl group significantly influences the adsorption of both CH4 and CO2, while the ether group has a propensity to impact CH4 adsorption, and the carbonyl group is inclined to influence CO2 adsorption. The research findings are expected to provide technical support for the effective promotion of CO2-ECBM technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 9963 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Deep Coalbed Methane Potential and Prediction of Favorable Areas within the Yulin Area, Ordos Basin, Based on a Multi-Level Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
by Keyu Zhou, Fengrui Sun, Chao Yang, Feng Qiu, Zihao Wang, Shaobo Xu and Jiaming Chen
Processes 2024, 12(4), 820; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040820 - 18 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 604
Abstract
The research on the deep coalbed methane (CBM) in the Ordos Basin is mostly concentrated on the eastern margin of the basin. The geological resources of the Benxi Formation in the Yulin area, located in the central-eastern part, cover 15,000 × 108 [...] Read more.
The research on the deep coalbed methane (CBM) in the Ordos Basin is mostly concentrated on the eastern margin of the basin. The geological resources of the Benxi Formation in the Yulin area, located in the central-eastern part, cover 15,000 × 108 m3, indicating enormous resource potential. However, the characteristics of the reservoir distribution and the favorable areas are not yet clear. This research comprehensively performed data logging, coal rock experiments, and core observations to identify the geological characteristics of the #8 coal seam, using a multi-level fuzzy mathematics method to evaluate the favorable area. The results indicate the following: (1) The thickness of the #8 coal in the Yulin Block ranges from 2.20 m to 11.37 m, with depths of between 2285.72 m and 3282.98 m, and it is mainly underlain by mudstone; the gas content ranges from 9.74 m3/t to 23.38 m3/t, showing a northwest–low and southeast–high trend. The overall area contains low-permeability reservoirs, with a prevalence of primary structural coal. (2) A multi-level evaluation system for deep CBM was established, dividing the Yulin Block into three types of favorable areas. This block features a wide range of Type I favorable areas, concentrated in the central-eastern, northern, and southwestern parts; Type II areas are closely distributed around the edges of Type I areas. The subsequent development process should prioritize the central-eastern part of the study area. The evaluation system established provides a reference for selecting favorable areas for deep CBM and offers theoretical guidance for targeted exploration and development in the Yulin area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3484 KiB  
Article
A Numerical Simulation of the Coal Dust Migration Law in Directional Air Drilling in a Broken Soft Coal Seam
by Jie Zhang, Zichen Han, Tianzhu Chen, Ningping Yao, Xianyu Yang, Chan Chen and Jihua Cai
Processes 2024, 12(2), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12020309 - 1 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 777
Abstract
Abundant industrial experiences have shown that directional air drilling technology is effective for gas drainage when drilling broken and soft coal seams. In this paper, the Eulerian–Eulerian model was used to simulate the gas–solid two-phase flow behavior of compressed air transporting coal dust [...] Read more.
Abundant industrial experiences have shown that directional air drilling technology is effective for gas drainage when drilling broken and soft coal seams. In this paper, the Eulerian–Eulerian model was used to simulate the gas–solid two-phase flow behavior of compressed air transporting coal dust in broken soft coal seams. The relationship between the degree of coal dust deposition, annular air pressure law, transportation of coal dust, aforementioned factors of rotational speed, particle size, and air volume could be determined. The results indicate that the particle size plays a significant role in the transport capacity of coal dust. Smaller particle sizes and a higher airflow result in a lower deposition degree of coal dust. When the particle size of coal dust is 1.69 mm and the airflow is 300 m3/h, in the case of coal dust generation at a rate of 0.24 m3/h, the deflection angle of the coal dust collection zone is increased by 130% as the rotational speed of the drill rod is increased from 0 to 120 rpm. Similarly, the deflection angle of the coal dust collection zone is increased by 12.8% in a 500 m3/h airflow under the same condition. Additionally, fine particle-sized coal dust is transported in a spiral line. The coal dust with larger particle sizes tends to be in the middle and lower parts of the hole and move along a specific trajectory. Industrial experiences of medium-air-pressure drilling confirm that a rotary drilling speed between 80 and 120 rpm, with a minimum air volume of 400 m3/h and preferably 500 m3/h, can promote a smooth hole drilling effect and enhance the construction safety in the gas drainage process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 5248 KiB  
Article
Experimental Water Activity Suppression and Numerical Simulation of Shale Pore Blocking
by Yansheng Shan, Hongbo Zhao, Weibin Liu, Juan Li, Huanpeng Chi, Zongan Xue, Yunxiao Zhang and Xianglong Meng
Processes 2023, 11(12), 3366; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11123366 - 4 Dec 2023
Viewed by 739
Abstract
The nanoscale pores in shale oil and gas are often filled with external nanomaterials to enhance wellbore stability and improve energy production. And there has been considerable research on discrete element blocking models and simulations related to nanoparticles. In this paper, the pressure [...] Read more.
The nanoscale pores in shale oil and gas are often filled with external nanomaterials to enhance wellbore stability and improve energy production. And there has been considerable research on discrete element blocking models and simulations related to nanoparticles. In this paper, the pressure transmission experimental platform is used to systematically study the influence law of different water activity salt solutions on shale permeability and borehole stability. In addition, the force model of the particles in the pore space is reconstructed to study the blocking law of the particle parameters and fluid physical properties on the shale pore space based on the discrete element hydrodynamic model. However, the migration and sealing patterns of nanomaterials in shale pores are unknown, as are the effects of changes in particle parameters on nanoscale sealing. The results show that: (1) The salt solution adopts a formate system, and the salt solution is most capable of blocking the pressure transmission in the shale pores when the water activity is 0.092. The drilling fluid does not easily penetrate into the shale pore space, and it is more capable of maintaining the stability of the shale wellbore. (2) For the physical blocking numerical simulation, the nanoparticle concentration is the most critical factor affecting the shale pore blocking efficiency. Particle size has a large impact on the blocking efficiency of shale pores. The particle diameter increases by 30% and the pore-blocking efficiency increases by 13% when the maximum particle size is smaller than the pore exit. (3) Particle density has a small effect on the final sealing effect of pore space. The pore-plugging efficiency is only increased by 4% as the particle density is increased by 60%. (4) Fluid viscosity has a significant effect on shale pore plugging. The increase in viscosity at a nanoparticle concentration of 1 wt% significantly improves the sealing effectiveness, specifically, the sealing efficiency of the 5 mPa-s nanoparticle solution is 16% higher than that of the 1 mPa-s nanoparticle solution. Finally, we present a technical basis for the selection of a water-based drilling fluid system for long horizontal shale gas drilling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Exploration and Practice)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop