Next Article in Journal
Implementation of a Virtual Instrument in the System for Measuring Forces and Temperatures in the Milling Process
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Strand Formation via Gas Phase Reactions from Al-Co-Fe Reacted with CaF2-SiO2-Al2O3-MgO Flux at 1350 °C: SEM Study and Thermochemistry Calculations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gold(I) Complexes with P-Donor Ligands and Their Biological Evaluation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Shokeer et al. Mutational Analysis of the Binding of Alternative Substrates and Inhibitors to the Active Site of Human Glutathione Transferase P1–1. Processes 2020, 8, 1232

1
Department of Molecular Biology, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza 126 22, Egypt
2
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(7), 1343; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071343
Submission received: 4 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 28 June 2024
The changes below represent the corrections the authors wish to make to the original paper [1].

Errors in Tables

The authors wish to make changes to Tables 2–4. In the original publication, one of the values in Table 2 was not consistent with the text. For Tables 3 and 4, several values were missing a decimal point. The new Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 are attached below.

Changes to Figure and Figure Legend

The authors wish to make changes to Figure 3 and the Figure legend. In the original publication, some values were miscalculated, and a minor typographical error was detected in the Figure legend. The new Figure 3 with the Figure legend has been updated below.

Correction to Equation

The equation present in the original publication had a typographical error in it. The adjusted equation is attached below.
ΔΔG = −RT ln (Ki/Ki*)

Correction to Text

The authors wish to make changes to errors found in the main text.
3.3. Steady-State Kinetics
Paragraph 1: Original text: Mutant Q52K is most strongly affected with a nine-fold increase of KMCDNB, an eight-fold decrease of kcat, and a resulting 70-fold decrease of kcat/KMGSH (Table 2).
New text: Mutant Q52K is most strongly affected with a nine-fold increase in KMGSH, an eight-fold decrease in kcat, and a resulting seventy-fold decrease in kcat/KMGSH (Table 2).
Paragraph 3: Original text: However, the catalytic efficiency could be determined and showed that mutant Q52K was 50% more efficient than the wild-type enzyme with GSH as the varied thiol substrate.
New text: However, the catalytic efficiency could be determined and showed that the mutant Q52K only displayed a fraction (1.5%) of the efficiency of the wild-type enzyme with GSH as the varied thiol substrate.
3.4. Inhibition Studies
Paragraph 8: Original text: a potent ligand.
New text: a potent inhibitor.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusion of the paper is unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Shokeer, A.; Ismail, A.; Hegazy, U.M.; Kolm, R.H.; Mannervik, B. Mutational Analysis of the Binding of Alternative Substrates and Inhibitors to the Active Site of Human Glutathione Transferase P1–1. Processes 2020, 8, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 3. Schemes of incremental binding energies (kJ mol−1) compared to the binding of five different glutathione derivatives to wild-type GST P1–1 and mutants K45A, Q52A, and Q52K. The complexes with S-hexylglutathione, γE-C(Hx)-G (upper left corners), serve as references. Positive values indicate increased binding affinities.
Figure 3. Schemes of incremental binding energies (kJ mol−1) compared to the binding of five different glutathione derivatives to wild-type GST P1–1 and mutants K45A, Q52A, and Q52K. The complexes with S-hexylglutathione, γE-C(Hx)-G (upper left corners), serve as references. Positive values indicate increased binding affinities.
Processes 12 01343 g003
Table 2. Steady-state kinetic parameters of wild-type human GST P1–1 and mutants.
Table 2. Steady-state kinetic parameters of wild-type human GST P1–1 and mutants.
ParameterVaried Substrate GST P1–1 Variant
Wild-TypeQ52KQ52AK45A
kcat/Km (s−1 mM−1)
kcat/Km (s−1 mM−1)
CDNB
Glutathione
83 ± 2
345 ± 9
4.9 ± 0.5
5.0 ± 0.5
25.6 ± 0.9
17.3 ± 0.8
46 ± 22
21.6 ± 0.4
Km (mM)
Km (mM)
CDNB
Glutathione
2.6 ± 0.2
0.5 ± 0.1
7.0 ± 2
4.7 ± 0.6
6.2 ± 0.8
2.8 ± 0.3
3.8 ± 0.4
0.8 ± 0.1
Vmax (µmol min−1 mg−1) 570 ± 3070 ± 20340 ± 30440 ± 30
One substrate concentration was varied, whereas the concentration of the other substrate was kept constant. Constant CDNB was kept at 2 mM, and constant glutathione was kept at 6 mM in order to maintain approximately saturating conditions.
Table 3. Saturation kinetics in three dimensions.
Table 3. Saturation kinetics in three dimensions.
Vmax (µmol min−1 mg−1)
[CDNB]
(mM)
Wild-Type
GSH
Q52K
GSH
Wild-TypeQ52K
0.2631.17.0<0.1
0.51102.99.90.6
11625.911.64.3
“Saturated”278No value13.8No value
Vmax values as obtained for three different concentrations of CDNB with variable concentrations of glutathione or γ-glutamylcysteine.
Table 4. Catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of GST P1–1 variants with alternative thiol substrates.
Table 4. Catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of GST P1–1 variants with alternative thiol substrates.
SubstrateGST P1–1 Variant
Wild-TYPE
kcat/Km (mM−1 s−1)
Q52K
kcat/Km (mM−1 s−1)
GSH380 ± 405.9 ± 0.6
γE-C70 ± 1.33.6 ± 1.4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shokeer, A.; Ismail, A.; Hegazy, U.M.; Kolm, R.H.; Mannervik, B. Correction: Shokeer et al. Mutational Analysis of the Binding of Alternative Substrates and Inhibitors to the Active Site of Human Glutathione Transferase P1–1. Processes 2020, 8, 1232. Processes 2024, 12, 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071343

AMA Style

Shokeer A, Ismail A, Hegazy UM, Kolm RH, Mannervik B. Correction: Shokeer et al. Mutational Analysis of the Binding of Alternative Substrates and Inhibitors to the Active Site of Human Glutathione Transferase P1–1. Processes 2020, 8, 1232. Processes. 2024; 12(7):1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shokeer, Abeer, Aram Ismail, Usama M. Hegazy, Rüdiger H. Kolm, and Bengt Mannervik. 2024. "Correction: Shokeer et al. Mutational Analysis of the Binding of Alternative Substrates and Inhibitors to the Active Site of Human Glutathione Transferase P1–1. Processes 2020, 8, 1232" Processes 12, no. 7: 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop