Next Article in Journal
Ultra-Short-Term Load Forecasting for Extreme Scenarios Based on DBSCAN-RSBO-BiGRU-KNN-Attention with Fine-Tuning Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
Machine Learning in Carbon Capture, Utilization, Storage, and Transportation: A Review of Applications in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Influence of Alternating Stress in the Multi-Cycle Injection Production Process

1
Oil and Gas Technology Institute, PetroChina Qinghai Oilfield Company, Dunhuang 736202, China
2
Faculty of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(4), 1158; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041158
Submission received: 17 March 2025 / Revised: 3 April 2025 / Accepted: 9 April 2025 / Published: 11 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Systems)

Abstract

In order to study the influence of multi-cycle stress sensitivity on the injection–production effect, it is necessary to conduct multi-cycle stress sensitivity experiments on reservoir permeability and fracture conductivity first and then calculate the impact on the injection–production effect after the occurrence of the stress sensitivity effect by using the CMG software. After stress sensitivity occurs and the production rate decreases, the constraints of the well should be adjusted. The results showed that the conductivity of the 30–50 mesh ceramsite decreased by 15.94% after 100 cycles, while the conductivity of the 20–40 mesh quartz sand decreased by 51.17%. Under alternating stress, the reservoir permeability decreased significantly during the first 50 cycles, with an average decrease of 20.8%, but remained relatively stable in the later stages. When stress sensitivity was disregarded, the gas production rate of the ceramic and quartz sand stabilized at approximately 3700 m3/h and 2600 m3/h, respectively. When stress sensitivity was considered, the secondary gas cushion for ceramsite had to reach at least 500,000 m3 to maintain a gas production rate of over 3700 m3/h within 40 cycles after the gas cushion. When stress sensitivity was considered, the secondary gas cushion for quartz sand had to exceed 800,000 cubic meters to maintain the gas production rate of over 2600 m3/h within the first 30 cycles after the gas cushion. To sustain the gas production rate over the long term, it was necessary to increase the injection pressure per cycle. The gas injection pressure for ceramsite should be adjusted to more than 17 MPa, and the gas injection pressure for quartz sand should be adjusted to more than 19.3 MPa.
Keywords: stress sensitivity; compressed air energy storage; numerical simulation; fracturing; low porosity and low permeability reservoir stress sensitivity; compressed air energy storage; numerical simulation; fracturing; low porosity and low permeability reservoir

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Zhao, E.; Ma, B.; Liu, H.; Yang, J.; Sui, G.; Yuan, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, L. Analysis of the Influence of Alternating Stress in the Multi-Cycle Injection Production Process. Processes 2025, 13, 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041158

AMA Style

Liu S, Zhao E, Ma B, Liu H, Yang J, Sui G, Yuan X, Ma X, Wang L. Analysis of the Influence of Alternating Stress in the Multi-Cycle Injection Production Process. Processes. 2025; 13(4):1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shiduo, Endong Zhao, Bin Ma, Huan Liu, Jianxuan Yang, Guojie Sui, Xin Yuan, Xinfang Ma, and Lei Wang. 2025. "Analysis of the Influence of Alternating Stress in the Multi-Cycle Injection Production Process" Processes 13, no. 4: 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041158

APA Style

Liu, S., Zhao, E., Ma, B., Liu, H., Yang, J., Sui, G., Yuan, X., Ma, X., & Wang, L. (2025). Analysis of the Influence of Alternating Stress in the Multi-Cycle Injection Production Process. Processes, 13(4), 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041158

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop