Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Factors and Mechanisms Affecting the Foaming of Triethylene Glycol in Natural Gas Purification
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Thermal Environment of Power Generation Cabin via Vapor Chamber in Cold Regions
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Discovery of Fracture Tip-Driven Stress Concentration: A Key Contributor to Casing Deformation in Horizontal Wells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Wellbore Instability Mechanism and High-Performance Water-Based Drilling Fluid for Deep Coal Reservoir

1
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
2
National Engineering Research Center of Coalbed Methane Development & Utilization Institute of Engineering Technology, Beijing 100095, China
3
CNPC Engineering Technology R & D Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
4
Guizhou Shale Gas exploration and development Co., Ltd., Zunyi 563400, China
5
Xinjiang Jinruichang Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Karamay 834008, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(5), 1262; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051262
Submission received: 28 February 2025 / Revised: 14 April 2025 / Accepted: 16 April 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025

Abstract

:
Deep coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs have the characteristics of low permeability, low porosity, and low water saturation, which easily experience wellbore instability due to drilling fluid, severely affecting drilling safety. Based on the physical property analysis of coal samples, the wellbore instability mechanism of the deep CBM reservoir was investigated by multiple methods. It was found that the wellbore instability is mainly caused by drilling fluid intrusion and the interaction between drilling fluid and coal formation; the fracture pressure of coal after immersion decreased from 27.4 MPa to 25.0 MPa because of the imbibition of drilling fluid. A novel nano-plugging agent with a size of 460 nm was prepared that can cement coal particles to form disc-shaped briquettes with a tensile strength of 2.27 MPa. Based on that, an effective anti-collapse drilling fluid for deep coal rock reservoirs was constructed, the invasion depth of the optimized drilling fluid was only 6 mm. The CT result shows that the number of fractures and pores in coal rock significantly reduced after treatment with the wellbore-stabilizing drilling fluid; nano-plugging anti-collapse agent in drilling fluid can form a dense layer on the coal surface, and then the hydration swelling of clay in the wellbore region can be effectively suppressed. Finally, the drilling fluid in this work can achieve the purpose of sealing and wettability alternation to prevent the collapse of the wellbore in the deep coal reservoir.

1. Introduction

China’s coalbed methane (CBM) exploration and development have entered the rapid expansion stage, establishing two major CBM production bases in the Southern Qinshui Basin and the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin [1,2], respectively. This marks a significant shift in exploration focus from high-rank to medium- and low-rank coals, while the development depth has extended from shallow reservoirs (<1000 m) to intermediate and deep formations (>1500 m). For CBM exploration efforts in regions deeper than 1500 m, daily gas production with horizontal well exceeds 1.0 × 105 m3. The deep coalbed methane resources of China are approximately 30.4 × 1012 m3 [3], which is crucial to the national energy structure, alleviating energy shortages under the strategy of reducing coal consumption, stabilizing oil production, and increasing natural gas utilization [4,5].
Coalbed methane, also known as coal seam gas, originates primarily from adsorbed gas on the surface of coal matrix particles; free gas in fractures; dissolved gas in coal seam water; and free gas trapped in thin sandstone, carbonate rocks, and other coal-bearing reservoirs. Unlike conventional natural gas, which requires large-scale migration before forming reservoirs, CBM is self-generated and self-stored within coal seams. This fundamental difference from conventional sandstone and carbonate reservoirs results in CBM’s unique characteristics, including high adsorption capacity, low permeability, and susceptibility to compression and fragmentation. These properties make CBM reservoirs prone to experience wellbore instability issues such as borehole collapse and lost circulation during horizontal drilling [6,7]. Furthermore, as drilling depth increases, the degree of coal metamorphism intensifies, water saturation decreases, temperature and pressure rise, porosity and permeability decline, and formation becomes more complex. These geological characteristics make deep CBM reservoirs more susceptible to wellbore instability compared to shallow formations, significantly impacting the safe and efficient development of coalbed methane resources.
Deep coal formations are highly brittle and weakly cemented, and they have strong pressure sensitivity, making them prone to collapse under pressure disturbances during drilling. Coal is susceptible to creep deformation, leading to fragmentation and instability. To mitigate these risks, drilling fluids should enhance wellbore stability and improve cementation strength [8,9]. Deep coal seams are characterized by well-developed cleats and microfractures, which facilitate the infiltration of drilling fluid filtrates through micropores, inducing a hydraulic wedge effect that weakens coal seam joints and triggers collapse. From a seepage mechanics perspective, improving the plugging performance of drilling fluids is essential to seal microfractures, reduce the permeability of seepage channels from the micron scale to the nanometer scale, and minimize filtrate invasion [10,11].
Deep CBM reservoirs exhibit strong heterogeneity due to the coexistence of multiple lithologies, including coal seams interbedded with gangue and carbonaceous mudstone [12,13]. The significant differences in mechanical and physicochemical properties among these lithologies exacerbate wellbore instability [14]. Over prolonged exposure to drilling fluids, the strength of coal–rock interfaces weakens, leading to interface instability between coal and gangue. Additionally, large volumes of free and desorbed gas trapped in deep coal formations invade the drilling fluid, causing a sudden drop in mud density. This initiates a vicious cycle of “wellbore instability–increased mud density–temporary stabilization–intensified filtrate invasion–worsening collapse”. To mitigate this issue, drilling fluids should enhance collapse resistance and reinforce interfacial strength. Moreover, due to the interbedded nature of coal, gangue, and carbonaceous mudstone, deep coal seams contain varying amounts of clay minerals, some of which are water-sensitive and prone to swelling upon hydration. This swelling exerts pressure on unconsolidated coal seams, leading to fragmentation, collapse, and wellbore instability.
To address these challenges, this study systematically analyzes the reservoir physical properties of deep coal formations in the Daning–Jixian block, identifies the key factors contributing to wellbore instability during deep coal drilling, and elucidates the wellbore instability mechanisms under the influence of drilling fluids. Based on the above study, a nano-plugging anti-collapse agent was prepared to seal microfracture, cement coal–rock, and stabilize wellbore. Then, an anti-collapse drilling fluid was developed for the deep CBM formations in the Daning–Jixian block, effectively resolving critical drilling challenges.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Main reagents: Nano-based anti-collapse plugging agent (prepared in the laboratory). Anhydrous ethanol (AR), purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Rock samples sourced from the Daning–Jixian block, with a diameter of 2.5 cm and a length of 5–7 cm. Core samples are provided by the Daning–Jixian block, core slices (25 mm × 5 mm) and core (25 mm × 50 mm).
Main instruments: OCA-25 Optical Contact Angle Measuring Instrument, manufactured by Dataphysics, Stuttgart, Germany. ME104E Precision Balance, manufactured by Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland. LDY-180 Core Flow Apparatus, produced by Jiangsu Hai’an Petroleum Instrument Co., Ltd. (Nantong, China). Gemini 450 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), manufactured by Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany. RTR-2000 High-Temperature, High-Pressure Rapid Rock Triaxial Testing System, developed by Beijing Shuangjie Te Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

2.2. Characterization

(1)
Contact Angle Experiment
The coal core was cut into slices with a diameter of 2.5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 cm, using a core-cutting machine. Then, the slices were polished to a smooth surface with 800-grit metallographic sandpaper. The contact angle of distilled water on the core surface was measured using an OCA-25 optical contact angle measuring instrument [15].
(2)
Core Microstructure Characterization
The polished coal core slices were immersed in drilling fluid from the oilfield at a temperature of 120 °C for 16 h, and then they were removed and air-dried at a temperature of 25 °C. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the microstructural changes before and after immersion. Additionally, the core slices were further polished to a smooth, level surface with 800-grit metallographic sandpaper, and a high-magnification metallographic microscope was employed to characterize the surface morphology of coal rock samples from the Jishen block.
(3)
Triaxial Mechanical Experiment
Two coal cores (25 × 50 mm) were selected for the triaxial mechanical experiment. Under a confining pressure of 2.5 MPa, the triaxial compressive strength tests were conducted on both a dry core (untreated with drilling fluid) and a wet core (immersed in drilling fluid at 120 °C for 16 h).
(4)
Sand-Bed Plugging Experiment
A portable zero-permeability filtration apparatus was used for the plugging experiment. First, 20–40 mesh quartz sand was poured into a transparent test cup up to the 180 mL mark, followed by the addition of 250 mL of drilling fluid. Under a pressure of 0.69 MPa, the invasion depth of both conventional anti-collapse drilling fluid and the newly developed anti-collapse drilling fluid was tested over time. The plugging performance of each system was evaluated based on the depth of fluid invasion into the sand bed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Physical Property Analysis of Deep Coal Reservoir

(1)
The clay mineral analysis of deep coal sample
The samples from Daning coal reservoir mainly consist of bright coal, followed by semi-bright coal; the texture of the sample is soft, and there is cleavage development, as shown in Figure 1. The content of clay in the coal samples ranges from 36.6% to 52.0%, and the average content is about 44.6%. The contents of clay minerals range from 48% to 2.2%, and the contents of illite and kaolinite are obviously high, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The non-expandable minerals primarily consist of quartz, calcite, and pyrite, among which the content of quartz is the most abundant. Consequently, the coal rock exhibits brittle characteristics, making it prone to crushing under the influence of external fluids. Additionally, the amorphous minerals within the pore throats would dissolve once contact was made with drilling fluid, leading to a reduction in the local structural integrity of the coal rock [16,17]. Therefore, the hard brittle minerals in coal rock are easy to break and block, thus affecting the wellbore stability.
(2)
The BET analysis of deep coal sample
The specific surface area and pore size distribution of the rock samples were determined using the BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) adsorption method. The BET-specific surface area of the coal rock was measured to be 0.274 m2/g, with an average pore size of 25.61 nm, exhibiting characteristics of a Type II adsorption isotherm, as shown in Figure 2. The adsorption capacity initially increases rapidly before leveling off, followed by a sharp rise in the latter stage. This curve corresponds to an H4-type adsorption hysteresis loop, indicating the presence of narrow slit-shaped pores and fractures within the core [18].
(3)
The wettability evaluation of deep coal formation
The contact angle method was used to measure the water-phase contact angles on the surfaces of coal rock, sandstone, and shale, as shown in Figure 3. The contact angle of water on the coal surface was the highest, 84°, indicating the coal wettability has weak hydrophilicity; meanwhile, sandstone and shale exhibited strong hydrophilicity, the contact angles on which are 36° and 38°, respectively. During the drilling process, coal rock and interbedded gangue formations tend to spontaneously absorb drilling fluids, leading to the hydration swelling of clay minerals around the wellbore [19]. Additionally, the concentrated release of stress from hard and brittle minerals can result in wellbore instability and collapse.

3.2. Wellbore Instability Mechanism of Deep Coal Rock Reservoir

(1)
Effect of drilling fluid on coal surface morphology
The surface morphology of the coal sample before and after drilling fluid immersion was analyzed using the SEM technique [20]. The results indicate that the original coal sample exhibits a high surface roughness, with well-developed pores and microfractures, as shown in Figure 4a. A small amount of mud and sand can be observed filling the spaces between mineral crystals, and irregular particles are attached to the surface. After 16 h of immersion in drilling fluid, multiple fractures and an increased number of irregular particles (blue line) appear on the coal surface, as shown in Figure 4f, which can be attributed to the hydration and swelling of clay minerals within the pore–throat, leading to structural changes in the pores and throats. Additionally, as hydrated clay mineral particles swell and break into fragments, they detach from the coal rock surface, further altering its morphology.
(2)
Effect of Drilling Fluid on the Mechanical Properties of Coal Rock
Deep coal rock core samples with a size of 25 mm × 50 mm were selected for triaxial mechanical strength testing using the RTR-2000 High-Temperature, High-Pressure Rapid Rock Triaxial Testing System. The tests were conducted under a confining pressure of 2.5 MPa before and after immersion in drilling fluid. The drilling fluid soaking conditions were set at 120 °C for 16 h. Figure 5 shows the effect of drilling fluid immersion on the mechanical properties of coal rock. Figure 5a shows that the Sd-deviator stress of coal before immersion was 27.4 MPa, which decreased to 25.0 MPa after being immersed in drilling fluid. The fracture pressure experiences a significant reduction because of the imbibition of drilling fluid. Deep coal formations exhibit well-developed cleats and fractures, resulting in a large specific surface area. Due to capillary forces, drilling fluid filtrates easily infiltrate along these cleats and fractures, causing the hydration of clay minerals and simultaneously lubricating weak structural surfaces [21,22]. This leads to stress concentration along the cleat planes, reducing the strength of the coal rock. As a result, internal cracks propagate, extend, and spall, eventually leading to failure of the coal rock and gangue’s interfacial strength. As pore pressure increases, the deformation and instability of coal rock fragments around the wellbore become more pronounced, ultimately causing mechanical failure. Additionally, drill string collisions, tripping-induced scraping, and pressure fluctuations during drilling can further impact wellbore stability.

3.3. Synthesis and Evaluation of Nano Plugging Agent

(1)
The design of nano plugging agent
The nano-plugging agent with a size of 460 nm was prepared by the surface modification method. The synthesis procedure is as follows: Firstly, certain amounts of nano-silica, ethanol, and polyamine monomer were mixed in a flask; then, ethanol was dripped and stirred evenly at room temperature. Nitrogen was used to protect the product. The temperature was gradually increased to 75 °C, and azodiisobutylcyanide was placed in the solution as the initiator. The product was dried and grinded to prepare the nano-plugging agent. Figure 6 shows the synthesis routine and mechanism of the prepared nano-plugging agent. The nano-plugging agent can enter into the pores and cracks in the coal formation to form a compact adsorption layer to prevent the intrusion of drilling fluid.
Figure 7 shows the TG curve of the prepared nano-plugging agent. Three stages in the mass loss process of the agent can be observed when the temperature increases. The temperature of the first stage ranges from 25 °C to 185 °C, and the mass loss is about 1.41%. The mass loss can be ascribed to the loss of free water in the agent. As the temperature increases to 240 °C, the volatilization of crystal water in the molecule contributes to the mass loss of the nano-plugging agent [23]; the mass loss in this stage is about 17.8%. In the third stage, the mass loss of the agent was 16.5% when the temperature increased from 245 °C to 300 °C, and a sharp reduction in mass can be observed, which was mainly due to the thermal decomposition of amide groups in molecular chains, leading to a mass loss of agent. Generally, thermal degradation of the prepared agent occurs once the temperature exceeds 245 °C, indicating that the prepared agent is of favorable thermal stability.
As illustrated in Figure 8, the absorption peaks located at 3426 cm−1 can be ascribed to the vibration of the C=O bond in the ester group of the plugging agent. The peak at 2885 cm−1 can be assigned to the stretching vibration of -CH2- in the molecular structure [24]. The peak at 1762 cm−1 can be ascribed to the ester carbonyl absorption of polyurethane, and the stretching vibration absorption peak of the tertiary amide group C=O in polyurethane is observed at 1635 cm−1 [25]. The characteristic absorption peak of the C-O-C bending vibration peak of the ester group in the polyurethane molecule appeared at 1141 cm−1. The vibration peak of the C-N bond in the quaternary ammonium group of the prepared plugging agent is noted at 917 cm−1 [26]. Notably, the strength of the characteristic peak increases with the increasing concentration of the agent.
(2)
Tensile strength test
In total, 5 g of coal particles with 10–20 mesh was evenly spread in a 3.4 cm diameter polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mold. Subsequently, 5 mL of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent solutions with varying concentrations was added to the solution. The samples were then placed in an 80 °C oven and dried for 8 h. It can be observed that coal particles had formed disc-shaped briquettes with a certain degree of plasticity and strength, as shown in Figure 9a. Tensile strength tests were conducted on the coal sample, and the strength of coal sample increased to 2.27 MPa after being treated with 3% nano-plugging agent. However, the strength experienced a low decrease (1.854 MPa) with the increasing concentration of agent; the results are shown in Table 3. The control sample (without treatment) remained loose and did not undergo cementation. In contrast, coal samples treated with different concentrations of the nano-plugging anti-collapse agent solutions exhibited excellent cementation. The tensile strength of the cemented coal initially increased with the increasing concentration of the solution, followed by a decline, indicating that an optimal amount of the nano-plugging anti-collapse agent is 1.0%.
(3)
Surface Morphology Analysis Before and After Plugging
FE-SEM was used to observe the microstructural changes in the coal sample from the Jishen block before and after treatment, as can be seen in Figure 10. After treatment with the nano-plugging anti-collapse agent, a compact adsorption layer formed on the coal surface, and the nanopores and microfractures were effectively plugged (Figure 10c). This adsorption layer can prevent the invasion of drilling fluid into the deep coal formation. Hence, the hydration swelling of clay in the wellbore region can be effectively suppressed. Additionally, the plugging layer decreased stress transfer within the borehole wall and prevented borehole collapse caused by stress concentration. Therefore, wellbore integrity can be reinforced, significantly improving wellbore stability.

3.4. Evaluation of Anti-Collapsing Drilling Fluid

Based on the physical parameter analysis of deep CBM reservoirs and wellbore instability mechanism, we determined that the clay minerals in the Danning–Jixian deep CBM formation are primarily kaolinite and illite–smectite mixed layers, with a certain degree of hydration expansion. The coal is prone to spontaneous imbibition due to microcracks, thus weakening the coal strength. Therefore, the drilling fluid for deep CBM reservoirs should possess excellent plugging properties.
(1)
Rheological properties of the anti-collapsing drilling fluid
The rheological properties of drilling fluids for the deep CBM reservoir include appropriate viscosity, yield point, good shear thinning, and flow behavior. After fully considering the reservoir characteristics and optimizing the selection of thickeners and stabilizers, a series of experiments were conducted to form an optimized drilling fluid composition: 2% base slurry, 1% starch, 1% nano-plugging agent, 0.5% PAC-LV, 2% lignite, 1% white asphalt, 1% natural asphalt, 3% ultrafine calcium carbonate, and barite, as shown in Table 4.
As can be seen from the above results, the apparent viscosity, plastic viscosity, and yield point of the constructed drilling fluid are 60 mPa·s, 52 mPa·s, and 8.25; thus, the drilling fluid exhibits excellent rheological properties, and the viscosity and yield point values meet the rheological requirements of CBM reservoirs. The flow loss is less than 4 mL, which effectively satisfies the requirements of rock carrying, wellbore cleaning, and filter cake formation properties for drilling fluid in the deep CBM reservoir.
(2)
Impact of anti-collapsing drilling fluid on the coal wettability
As shown in Figure 11, the contact angle of water on the untreated coal surface is 84°. After aging for different times, the variation in the contact angle of water on the coal surface remained minimal. When the aging time reached 24 h, the contact angle of water on the surface reached its maximum, at 89°, indicating that the coal surface still maintains weak hydrophilicity, making it difficult for water to spread on its surface. After aging for 72 h, the coal sample treated by the drilling fluid retained its hydrophilicity, and then the invasion of the drilling fluid caused by capillary force could be reduced.
(3)
Sealing performance of wellbore-stabilizing drilling fluid
The sand-bed plugging test effectively evaluates the sealing performance of drilling fluids on coal-bearing rock reservoirs. The invasion depth of drilling fluid in the sand bed reflects its interaction with the reservoir, which visually demonstrates the sealing efficiency of the drilling fluid, as can be seen in Table 5. Under a specific pressure for 30 min, the invasion depth of conventional drilling fluid in the sand bed was 18.5 mm. In contrast, the invasion depth of the optimized drilling fluid under the same conditions was only 6 mm. The experiment demonstrates that the drilling fluid in this paper exhibited a favorable sealing performance compared to conventional drilling fluid.
CT scanning experiments of coal samples before and after drilling fluid injection were conducted to extract the internal fractures [27,28], which can be used to evaluate the plugging performance of the drilling fluid, the blue represents the fractures, and the yellow represents the pore in the rock, as can be seen in Figure 12. After treatment with the wellbore-stabilizing drilling fluid, the fractal dimension of coal after being treated by the constructed drilling fluid increased from 2.3 to 2.1, indicating that the complexity of pores and fractures was reduced. The porosity of coal samples increased from 5.9% to 1.5%, and the number of fractures and pore volume within the coal rock significantly reduced, indicating that the drilling fluid exhibited good plugging performance, which can achieve the purpose of sealing micropores and fractures in the coal reservoir, preventing the collapse of the wellbore.

4. Conclusions

To address the wellbore instability issues during the drilling process in the deep CBM reservoir, the wellbore instability mechanisms of the deep CBM reservoir were investigated. A novel nano-plugging agent was prepared, based on the above study, and the drilling fluid with the feature of anti-collapsing for the deep CBM reservoir was constructed as follows:
(1)
The coal rock is prone to collapse under the interaction of drilling fluids. The amorphous minerals within the pore throats would dissolve once contact is made with drilling fluid, leading to a reduction in the local structural integrity of the coal rock. The radius of the pore throat is small, leading to a strong capillary force, and then the external fluid that can be imbibed into the coal rock becomes more difficult to flow back, further reducing the strength of the coal rock.
(2)
The prepared nano-plugging anti-collapse agent can effectively cement coal particles and fracture to stabilize the wellbore. The tensile strength of the coal briquettes increased to 2.27 MPa after being treated with the anti-collapse agent solution. The mechanism of the agent is that the nano-plugging anti-collapse agent forms a dense layer on the coal surface by sealing micropores and microcracks, and the adsorption layer can cement coal particles together. Hence, the hydration swelling of clay in the wellbore region can be effectively suppressed. Additionally, the plugging layer decreased stress transfer within the borehole wall and prevented the borehole collapse caused by stress concentration.
(3)
The drilling fluid for deep coal rock reservoirs was constructed, which exhibits excellent plugging and collapse prevention performance by plugging and wettability alternation. The invasion depth of the optimized drilling fluid in the sand bed was only 6 mm compared to that of conventional drilling fluid. The fractal dimension of untreated coal increased from 2.3 to 2.1, indicating that the complexity of pores and fractures was reduced. The porosity of coal samples increased from 5.9% to 1.5%, indicating that the drilling fluid exhibited good plugging performance, and the coal sample treated by the drilling fluid maintained hydrophilicity.
At present, the biggest challenge during the drilling process is wellbore instability, especially for long horizontal well drilling. Drilling fluid with a better capacity of plugging and anti-collapse is the guarantee for safe and efficient development of CBM reservoirs.

Author Contributions

Methodology, J.H., J.S., K.L. and J.J.; Software, K.L., J.J. and Y.L.; Validation, J.H., J.X., K.L., K.R., H.L. and Y.W.; Formal analysis, J.X., K.R. and J.J.; Investigation, J.H., J.X., K.R. and H.L.; Resources, J.S., H.L., Y.L. and Y.W.; Data curation, Y.L. and Y.W.; Writing—original draft, J.H. and J.J.; Supervision, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support from the Research on Optimal and Rapid Drilling and Completion Technology for Deep Coal Seam Gas (No. 2023ZZ18YJ05), Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U22B6004),the National Natural Science Foundation Science Center Project (No. 52288101).

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Sun Jinsheng and Long Yifu were employed by the company CNPC Engineering Technology R & D Co., Ltd.; Author Li Hailong was employed by the company Guizhou Shale Gas exploration and development Co., Ltd.; Author Wu Yang was employed by the company Xinjiang Jinruichang Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, F.; Hou, W.; Xiong, X.; Xu, B.; Wu, P.; Wang, H.; Feng, K.; Yun, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; et al. The status and development strategy of coalbed methane industry in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2023, 50, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Ge, Z.; Chen, C.; Hou, Y.; Ye, M. Current status and effective suggestions for efficient exploitation of coalbed methane in China: A review. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 9102–9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dai, J.; Dong, D.; Ni, Y.; Gong, D.; Huang, S.; Hong, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Wu, X.; Feng, Z. Distribution patterns of tight sandstone gas and shale gas. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2024, 51, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, B.; Stuart, F.M.; Xu, S.; Györe, D.; Liu, C. Evolution of coal-bed methane in Southeast Qinshui Basin, China: Insights from stable and noble gas isotopes. Chem. Geol. 2019, 529, 119298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, W.; Deng, S.; Sun, Y. Recent advances on shale oil and gas exploration and development technologies. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2024, 11, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, T.; Liu, S.; Lin, B.; Fu, X.; Zhu, C.; Yang, W.; Zhao, Y. Stress response during in-situ gas depletion and its impact on permeability and stability of CBM reservoir. Fuel 2020, 266, 117083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Puspitasari, R.; Gan, T.; Pallikathekathil, Z.J.; Luft, J. Wellbore Stability Modelling for Horizontal and Multibranch Lateral Wells in CBM: Practical Solution to Better Understand the Uncertainty in Rock Strength and Coal Heterogeneity. In Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bangkok, Thailand, 25–27 August 2014; p. SPE-171454-MS. [Google Scholar]
  8. Altowilib, A.; AlSaihati, A.; Alhamood, H.; Alafnan, S.; Alarifi, S. Reserves estimation for coalbed methane reservoirs: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, C.; Elsworth, D. Strengthening mylonitized soft-coal reservoirs by microbial mineralization. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2018, 200, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mosser, M.H. Plugging of CBM wells. In Coal Bed Methane; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 377–395. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jin, J.; Lv, K.; Sun, J.; Bai, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Huang, X. A Novel Self-Photodegradation Drilling Fluids Under Near-Infrared Light Irradiation with Preferable Wellbore Stability. In Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Online, 12–14 October 2021; p. D031S024R005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Giraldo, L.J.; Medina, O.E.; Ortiz-Perez, V.; Franco, C.A.; Cortés, F.B. Enhanced carbon storage process from flue gas streams using rice husk silica nanoparticles: An approach in shallow coal bed methane reservoirs. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 2945–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Xie, H.; Chen, S. Petrophysical and Mechanical Properties of Complex Structure Coalbed Methane Reservoir: A Laboratory Investigation. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2023, 56, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kang, Y.; Yu, M.; Miska, S.; Takach, N.E. Wellbore stability: A critical review and introduction to DEM. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition? New Orleans, LV, USA, 4–7 October 2009; p. SPE-124669-MS. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Ren, J.; Bai, B.; Dai, C. The effect of fluorosurfactant-modified nano-silica on the gas-wetting alteration of sandstone in a CH4-liquid-core system. Fuel 2016, 178, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, W.; Jin, J.; Xin, J.; Lv, K.; Ren, K.; Xu, J.; Cao, Z.; Zhuo, R. Damage Mechanism of Deep Coalbed Methane Reservoir and Novel Anti-Waterblocking Protection Technology. Processes 2024, 12, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, L.; Liu, D.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jia, Q. Coal structure and its implications for coalbed methane exploitation: A review. Energy Fuels 2020, 35, 86–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, J.; Weng, H.; Li, B.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Song, Z. The influence mechanism of pore structure of tectonically deformed coal on the adsorption and desorption hysteresis. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 841353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, J.; Lv, K.; Sun, J.; Zhang, J.; Hou, Q.; Guo, X.; Liu, K. Robust superhydrophobic TiO2@ carbon nanotubes inhibitor with bombax structure for strengthening wellbore in water-based drilling fluid. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 370, 120946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Su, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lu, M.; Wang, H. Microfluidic insights into CO2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery in laminated shale reservoirs: Post-fracturing interface dynamics and micro-scale mechanisms. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2024, 13, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zou, B.; Pei, C.; Chen, Q.; Deng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Long, X. Progress on Multi-Field Coupling Simulation Methods in Deep Strata Rock Breaking Analysis. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2025, 142, 2457–2485. [Google Scholar]
  22. Niu, Q.; Hu, M.; Chang, J.; Wang, W.; Yuan, W.; Wang, Q.; Zheng, Y.; Shang, S. Explosive fracturing mechanism in low-permeability sandstone-type uranium deposits considering different acidification reactions. Energy 2024, 312, 133676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Izadifar, M.; Natzeck, C.; Emmerich, K.; Weidler, P.G.; Gohery, S.; Burvill, C.; Thissen, P. Unexpected chemical activity of a mineral surface: The role of crystal water in tobermorite. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 12405–12412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gopanna, A.; Mandapati, R.N.; Thomas, S.P.; Rajan, K.; Chavali, M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy and wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) of polypropylene (PP)/cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) blends for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Polym. Bull. 2019, 76, 4259–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yilgor, I.; Yilgor, E.; Guler, I.G.; Ward, T.C.; Wilkes, G.L. FTIR investigation of the influence of diisocyanate symmetry on the morphology development in model segmented polyurethanes. Polymer 2006, 47, 4105–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, J.; Sun, J.; Lv, K.; Hou, Q.; Guo, X.; Liu, K.; Deng, Y.; Song, L. Catalytic pyrolysis of oil shale using tailored Cu@zeolite catalyst and molecular dynamic simulation. Energy 2023, 278, 127858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mathews, J.P.; Campbell, Q.P.; Xu, H.; Halleck, P. A review of the application of X-ray computed tomography to the study of coal. Fuel 2017, 209, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Asif, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Hazlett, R.D. Mechanisms in CO2-enhanced coalbed methane recovery process. Adv. Geo-Energy Res. 2022, 6, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Images of deep coal rock from Jishen block. The blue line is the shape of the crack.
Figure 1. Images of deep coal rock from Jishen block. The blue line is the shape of the crack.
Processes 13 01262 g001
Figure 2. BET determination of deep CBM reservoir.
Figure 2. BET determination of deep CBM reservoir.
Processes 13 01262 g002
Figure 3. Measurement of contact angle on different rock samples.
Figure 3. Measurement of contact angle on different rock samples.
Processes 13 01262 g003
Figure 4. The morphology of coal samples in the Jishen area: (ac) before soaking and (df) after soaking.
Figure 4. The morphology of coal samples in the Jishen area: (ac) before soaking and (df) after soaking.
Processes 13 01262 g004
Figure 5. Effect of drilling-fluid immersion on mechanical properties of coal and rock: (a) before soaking and (b) after soaking.
Figure 5. Effect of drilling-fluid immersion on mechanical properties of coal and rock: (a) before soaking and (b) after soaking.
Processes 13 01262 g005
Figure 6. Schematic of synthesis and mechanism of the nano-plugging agent.
Figure 6. Schematic of synthesis and mechanism of the nano-plugging agent.
Processes 13 01262 g006
Figure 7. Thermogravimetric curve of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent.
Figure 7. Thermogravimetric curve of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent.
Processes 13 01262 g007
Figure 8. The FTIR curve of the prepared nano-plugging anti-collapse agent.
Figure 8. The FTIR curve of the prepared nano-plugging anti-collapse agent.
Processes 13 01262 g008
Figure 9. Influence of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent on the tensile strength: (a) coal briquettes treated by nano-plugging anti-collapse agent; (b) coal briquettes treated by 3% agent; (c) coal briquettes treated by 5% agent.
Figure 9. Influence of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent on the tensile strength: (a) coal briquettes treated by nano-plugging anti-collapse agent; (b) coal briquettes treated by 3% agent; (c) coal briquettes treated by 5% agent.
Processes 13 01262 g009
Figure 10. Influence of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent on core surface topography. (a) Untreated core; (b) Treated by polyurethane; (c) Nano-plugging agent.
Figure 10. Influence of nano-plugging anti-collapse agent on core surface topography. (a) Untreated core; (b) Treated by polyurethane; (c) Nano-plugging agent.
Processes 13 01262 g010
Figure 11. Wettability performance of anti-collapsing drilling fluid.
Figure 11. Wettability performance of anti-collapsing drilling fluid.
Processes 13 01262 g011
Figure 12. CT images of coal before and after being treated by anti-collapsing drilling fluid. The blue represents the fractures, and the yellow represents the pore in the rock.
Figure 12. CT images of coal before and after being treated by anti-collapsing drilling fluid. The blue represents the fractures, and the yellow represents the pore in the rock.
Processes 13 01262 g012
Table 1. XRD analysis of deep coal rock.
Table 1. XRD analysis of deep coal rock.
SampleTypeMineral Content%
QuartzOrthoclasePlagioclaseCalciteAnalciteDolomitePyriteAmorphousClay
1Coal///23.45.6/2.43236.6
2Coal39.2//5.2//7.410.038.2
3Coal gangue12.5///6.8/15.313.452.0
4Coal gangue7.2/1.54.7///35.051.6
Table 2. Clay minerals analysis of deep coal rock.
Table 2. Clay minerals analysis of deep coal rock.
SampleTypeRelative Content of Clay Minerals/%
SmectiteIllite/SmectiteIlliteKaoliniteChlorite
1Coal//82.717.3/
2Coal//92.87.2/
3Coal gangue//83.916.1/
4Coal gangue//67.532.5/
Table 3. The tensile test of the prepared nano-plugging agent.
Table 3. The tensile test of the prepared nano-plugging agent.
Concentration/%Rupture Force/NStrength/MPa
0.0--
0.5176.5721.625
1.0154.8111.785
3.0166.9072.272
5.0146.9371.854
Table 4. The rheological properties of the constructed drilling fluid.
Table 4. The rheological properties of the constructed drilling fluid.
Apparent Viscosity (mPa·s)Plastic
Viscosity (mPa·s)
Yield Point (pa)Flow Loss (mL)φ6φ3φ310″/φ310
60528.254543.5/14
Table 5. The plugging ability of drilling fluid at different times in sand bed.
Table 5. The plugging ability of drilling fluid at different times in sand bed.
TypeTime/min17.51530
Conventional drilling fluidFL/mL0000
Invasion depth/mm1618.518.518.5
The anti-collapse drilling fluidFL/mL0000
Invasion depth/mm45.55.76.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, J.; Xu, J.; Sun, J.; Lv, K.; Ren, K.; Jin, J.; Li, H.; Long, Y.; Wu, Y. Study on Wellbore Instability Mechanism and High-Performance Water-Based Drilling Fluid for Deep Coal Reservoir. Processes 2025, 13, 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051262

AMA Style

Han J, Xu J, Sun J, Lv K, Ren K, Jin J, Li H, Long Y, Wu Y. Study on Wellbore Instability Mechanism and High-Performance Water-Based Drilling Fluid for Deep Coal Reservoir. Processes. 2025; 13(5):1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Jinliang, Jie Xu, Jinsheng Sun, Kaihe Lv, Kang Ren, Jiafeng Jin, Hailong Li, Yifu Long, and Yang Wu. 2025. "Study on Wellbore Instability Mechanism and High-Performance Water-Based Drilling Fluid for Deep Coal Reservoir" Processes 13, no. 5: 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051262

APA Style

Han, J., Xu, J., Sun, J., Lv, K., Ren, K., Jin, J., Li, H., Long, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). Study on Wellbore Instability Mechanism and High-Performance Water-Based Drilling Fluid for Deep Coal Reservoir. Processes, 13(5), 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13051262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop