Process optimization is the method of choice for improving the performance of industrial processes, while also enforcing the satisfaction of safety and quality constraints. Long considered an appealing tool but only applicable to academic problems, optimization has now become a viable technology. Still, one of the strengths of optimization—namely, its inherent mathematical rigor—can also be perceived as a weakness, since engineers might sometimes find it difficult to obtain an appropriate mathematical formulation to solve their practical problems. Furthermore, even when process models are available, the presence of plant–model mismatches and process disturbances makes the direct use of model-based optimal inputs hazardous. In the last 30 years, the field of real-time optimization (RTO) has emerged to help overcome the aforementioned modeling difficulties. RTO integrates process measurements into the optimization framework. This way, process optimization does not rely exclusively on a (possibly inaccurate) process model but also on process information stemming from measurements. Various RTO techniques are available in the literature and can be classified in two broad families depending on whether a process model is used (explicit optimization) or not (implicit optimization).
This special issue on real-time optimization (http://www.mdpi.com/journal/processes/special_issues/real_time_optimization) includes both methodological and practical contributions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. All seven methodological contributions deal with explicit RTO schemes that repeat the optimization when new measurements become available. The methods covered include modifier adaptation, economic MPC, and the two-step approach of parameter identification and numerical optimization. The six contributions that deal with applications cover various fields including refineries, well networks, combustion, and membrane filtration.
This special issue shows that RTO is a very active area of research with excellent opportunities for applications. The guest editor would like to thank all authors for their timely collaboration on this project and excellent scientific contributions.
References
- Marchetti, A.; François, G.; Faulwasser, T.; Bonvin, D. Modifier Adaptation for Real-Time Optimization—Methods and Applications. Processes 2016, 4, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, W.; Hernández, R.; Engell, S. A Study of Explorative Moves during Modifier Adaptation with Quadratic Approximation. Processes 2016, 4, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gros, S. An Analysis of the Directional-Modifier Adaptation Algorithm Based on Optimal Experimental Design. Processes 2017, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaccari, M.; Pannocchia, G. A Modifier-Adaptation Strategy towards Offset-Free Economic MPC. Processes 2017, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binette, J.; Srinivasan, B. On the Use of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control without Parameter Adaptation for Batch Processes. Processes 2016, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwartadi, E.; Kungurtsev, V.; Jäschke, J. Sensitivity-Based Economic NMPC with a Path-Following Approach. Processes 2017, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jost, F.; Sager, S.; Le, T. A Feedback Optimal Control Algorithm with Optimal Measurement Time Points. Processes 2017, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Câmara, M.; Quelhas, A.; Pinto, J. Performance Evaluation of Real Industrial RTO Systems. Processes 2016, 4, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schäpel, J.; Reichel, T.; Klein, R.; Paschereit, C.; King, R. Online Optimization Applied to a Shockless Explosion Combustor. Processes 2016, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Prada, C.; Sarabia, D.; Gutierrez, G.; Gomez, E.; Marmol, S.; Sola, M.; Pascual, C.; Gonzalez, R. Integration of RTO and MPC in the Hydrogen Network of a Petrol Refinery. Processes 2017, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, D.; Foss, B.; Skogestad, S. Real-Time Optimization under Uncertainty Applied to a Gas Lifted Well Network. Processes 2016, 4, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelemenský, M.; Pakšiová, D.; Paulen, R.; Latifi, A.; Fikar, M. Combined Estimation and Optimal Control of Batch Membrane Processes. Processes 2016, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganesh, H.; Edgar, T.; Baldea, M. Model Predictive Control of the Exit Part Temperature for an Austenitization Furnace. Processes 2016, 4, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2017 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).