Next Article in Journal
Hydroxyapatite Precipitation and Accumulation in Granules and Its Effects on Activity and Stability of Partial Nitrifying Granules at Moderate and High Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrocoagulation Process: An Approach to Continuous Processes, Reactors Design, Pharmaceuticals Removal, and Hybrid Systems—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Enzyme-Assisted Ultrasonic Extraction of Total Flavonoids from Acanthopanax senticosus and Their Enrichment and Antioxidant Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arsenic and Fluoride in Groundwater, Prevalence and Alternative Removal Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/pr9101709
Review Report
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Low-Cost Synthesis of Alumina Nanoparticles and Their Usage for Bisphenol-A Removal from Aqueous Solutions

Processes 2021, 9(10), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101709
by Ollé Rodrigue Kam 1, Issaka Garikoe 1, Corneille Bakouan 1,2 and Boubié Guel 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2021, 9(10), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101709
Submission received: 30 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 17 September 2021 / Published: 24 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollutant Removal and Separation Processes in Chemical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find attached my remarks and suggestions

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript ID processes-1381539 is interesting and concerns the still current issue related to the bisphenol A removal from aqueous solutions . It fully corresponds to the Processes journal profile.

In my opinion, this is a well-prepared manuscript.

Meets the standards for the technical language, presentation of research methodology, and discussion of the results.

Graphical abstract will be very useful for readers.

If the authors write about "low cost", the costs incurred in relation to other adsorbents should be presented. This should be completed in the discussion.

I believe that a used statistical analysis of the results is necessary in order to determine the significance of the differences between efficiency of methane production. Please introduce to methodology section.

In how many repetitions the experiments and analyses were performed. This should be supplemented in the research methodology.

Standard deviations, not just average values, should be included in the results, tables and graphs.

No axis descriptions in the charts and no units. It needs to be completed.

In my opinion, after the introduction of these additions, the manuscript may be published.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made the required revision and I now find the article suitable for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript has been improved agree with my comments and in my opinion it can be publish in current form.

Back to TopTop