Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Oral Health in Children from Urban Slums of Nairobi, Kenya
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Biomarkers of Bone Metabolism on Salivary Matrix in the Remodeling of Periodontal Tissue during Orthodontic Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Dentistry Journal
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/dj12070210
dentistry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics Associated with the Occurrence of Impacted Third Molars in Indonesian Patients: A Retrospective Study

by
Indra Hadikrishna
1,
Melita Sylvyana
2,
Madhuri Pattamatta
3,
Folli Mulyawati
4 and
Tantry Maulina
1,3,*
1
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
2
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung 40161, Indonesia
3
Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 EX Nijmegen, The Netherlands
4
Dental Department, Kota Serang Regional Public Hospital, Serang 42124, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2024, 12(7), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070210
Submission received: 22 May 2024 / Revised: 10 June 2024 / Accepted: 28 June 2024 / Published: 9 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Diagnosis and Treatment of Dental Diseases and Tempromandibular Joints)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
An impacted third molar is one of the most common abnormalities of the tooth position, impacting patients and their quality of life. Based on the impact and the invasive removal procedure, this study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of impacted third molars based on their radiographic features as well as their association with demographic characteristics. Outpatient dental records of the oral and maxillofacial surgery department of Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia, from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019, were sorted, and relevant clinical and demographic data and panoramic radiographic examination results were extracted from these records. All data were then tabulated and analyzed by using SPSS version 29. As many as 3019 impacted third molars were identified. Our findings suggested the association between age to the occurrence of impacted third molars where patients aged between 17 and 29 years old showed high occurrences of impacted third molars. Male patients with impacted third molars are more likely to have multiple impacted third molars, while this risk decreases in females. Radiographic examination showed that the mesioangular position is the most common position for mandibular third molars. The variation in high occurrences of the impacted third molar is associated with several demographic factors.

1. Introduction

Impacted third molars, one of the most common problems in the oral cavity, can be caused by several factors, with the lack of space in the dental arch being one of the most common causes [1]. The global prevalence of impacted third molars varies from 16% to 68.6%, even though a slightly higher prevalence (73%) was found in the young European population [2]. As defined by Andreasen et al., the term “impacted” can be defined as “a cessation of the eruption of a tooth caused by a clinically or radiographically detectable physical impediment in the eruption path or by an ectopic position of the tooth” [3]. Impacted third molars have been known for their medical consequences within the orofacial area, namely, pain, swelling, caries formation on the adjacent tooth, periodontal disease, as well as the formation of dentigerous cysts [4,5]. Due to its various clinical impacts, the quality of life of impacted third molar(s) patients is often negatively influenced [5,6].
Due to the negative impact of impacted third molars, removal of impacted third molar has become one of the most performed oral surgery procedures [7]. Studies are continuously performed to investigate the occurrence of impacted third molars and its association with clinical, as well as sociodemographic, factors [8,9,10,11,12] to gain a better understanding as well as to prevent possible complications during removal procedures [13]. In a study conducted by Adeola et al. (2023), the occurrence of impacted third molar was associated with age where higher incidence was observed in the 21–29-year-old age group [11]. In a study performed by Al-Gunaid (2020), it was revealed that sex is associated with the behavior of impacted third molars. For example, women are most likely to have more upright posterior teeth and less inclined third molars [12]. In another study conducted by Ahmad et al. (2021) regarding the pattern of third molars impaction, it was found that impacted third molars were more likely to occur in women [13].
Additionally, studies regarding the radiographic characteristics of impacted third molars are continuously conducted as well [14,15,16,17]. Radiographic examination of impacted third molars can be used to predict possible complications, and as a decision-making tool, especially when the impacted third molar is asymptomatic [15,16]. In a study conducted by Fernandes et al. (2022), it was stated that there are three radiographic signs that can be used to determine possible alterations of the hard tissue and the necessity of third molar removal. Those signs are (1) marginal bone loss in the distal area of the adjacent second molar; (2) increased radiolucent area that surrounds the crown of the impacted third molar; and (3) bone resorption in the adjacent second molar [16]. This indicates the importance of including radiographic examination in the investigation of impacted third molars and their removal procedure.
Interestingly, regardless of the continuing studies, the characteristics of the impacted third molar and its association with the possible risk factors still show some variations. For example, even though previous studies showed an association between sex and the occurrence of impacted third molar [12,18], a study by Al-Dajani et al. (2017) showed the opposite, where no significant difference between males and females regarding impaction frequency, depth level, and angulation [19]. A similar result was also shown by Zaman et al. (2021) in their study regarding the pattern of third molar impaction where no significant gender predominance was found [20]. Based on the inconclusive results of the previous studies, this study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of impacted third molars based on their radiographic features as well as their association with demographic characteristics.

2. Material and Methods

This retrospective study recruited dental records of patients from the outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Hasan Sadikin Dental Hospital who came to have their third molar removal procedure from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019. Due to the nature of the study, no ethical approval was required. Prior to removal procedure of the impacted third molars, all patients signed an informed consent, consenting for their approval regarding the usage of their data for research purposes and any related future publications. Informed consent for patients under 18 years of age was also signed by their parent or legal guardian. Data regarding age, sex, number of impacted teeth, types of impacted teeth, and radiographic examination results were extracted from the dental record. Considering the most common age for the eruption of the third molars, only the data of those aged 17 years and above were included in this study. Therefore, the inclusion criteria of the current study were dental records of patients who came during this study period aged 17 years old or older and gave their consent for the usage of their data to be included in any future study related to their condition and treatment. If the dental record did not contain any of the required data, it was excluded from the study.

2.1. Radiographic Examination Identification

All patients had to go through a panoramic radiographic examination. The position of the impacted third molars was assessed based on the Pell and Gregory classification and the Pederson Index (the visualization of the Pederson index has been thoroughly described in Bali et al. [21]). The Pederson index offered a modification to the classification provided by Pell and Gregory. It may not correlate with the actual level of difficulty when used on an easy-to-moderate level of difficulty as the judgment is mainly based on local anatomy and radiographs [22]. The radiographic examination results were used to investigate the characteristics of the impacted third molar from a radiographic point of view.

2.2. Maxillary Third Molar

For relative depth, the radiographic examination findings on the maxillary third molar were classified based on the highest position of the third molar. If the highest position of the third molar was at the same level or above the occlusal plane of the second molar, then it was classified as class A, if it was between the occlusal plane and cervical line of the second molar, then it was classified as class B, and if it is below the cervical line of the second molar, then it was considered as class C. For maxillary impacted third molar, sinus approximation identification was conducted. If there was no bone or if there was a thin bone between the impacted third molar and the maxillary sinus, then the condition was identified as “sinus approximation”. If there was a bone that is at least 2 mm in thickness between the impacted third molar and the maxillary sinus, then the condition was identified as “no sinus approximation” [3]. If the sinus approximation identification cannot be concluded, then the impacted third molar will be identified as “undefined”.

2.3. Mandibular Third Molar

For the mandibular impacted third molars, the spatial relationship (the position of the impacted molar) was classified into mesioangular, horizontal, vertical, distoangular, and inverted. This was based on the Winter classification as described in the study by Kim et al. (2019) [23]. Similar to the upper third molar, a relative depth identification based on the highest position of the mandibular impacted third molars to the second molar was also performed. Lastly, the mandibular impacted third molars were also classified based on the space available between the ramus and the distal margin of the second molar (ramus relationship), as described in the study of Alsaegh et al. (2022) [24].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were then analyzed by using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corp. Released 2023. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 29.0.2.0 Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). The analysis of frequencies in the current study was performed by using Crosstabs analysis. Significant differences were tested by Chi-square analysis, and Odds ratio calculation was performed by binary logistic regression analysis.

3. Results

Eight hundred and eighty-five patients’ dental records were retrieved and analyzed in this study. Out of the 885 patients who underwent the third-molar dental procedure, 596 of them were females and 633 of them were between the age of 17 and 30 years old (age range 17–69 years old; mean age is 27.7 years old; SD = 9.3). Another highlight of the findings is that they are age-associated, and that those who are aged between 17 and 30 years old (76.62%) have a higher frequency of having 4 to 6 impacted teeth compared to those who are aged above 30 years. For those who are aged above 30 years old, there was no likelihood as to whether they will have 1–3 impacted teeth or 4–6 impacted teeth. The distribution of patients based on their demographic and clinical characteristics can be viewed in Table 1.
Sex and age of the patients were also used to reveal the proportion of bilateral and unilateral impacted third molars (see Table 1). From the figure, it can be seen that bilateral impacted third molars were most commonly found in female patients, and those aged 17–30 years old age range.
Out of the 885 hundreds dental records, 3019 impacted third molars were identified. Out of the 3019 impacted third molars, 48.29% (1458) were in the maxilla, and 51.71% (1561) were in the mandible. The impacted third molars were also classified based on the findings of the radiographical examination. Based on the findings, it was found that for the maxillary third molar, most impacted teeth had sinus approximation (right upper third molar: 468 teeth; left upper third molar 510 teeth). Additionally, when it comes to relative depth examination for the right upper third molar, most teeth were classified as class A, while the left upper third molars were mostly classified as class C. As for lower third molars, most impacted third molars on both sides were classified into class A, and class II for the ramus relationship classification (Table 2).
From Table 2, it can also be observed that the most current position for an impacted mandibular third molar is the mesioangular position followed by the horizontal position. It is interesting to note that when maxillary impacted third molars are compared with mandibular third molars, maxillary impacted third molars were more likely to reside below the cervical line of the second molar and therefore classified to Class C, while the mandibular third molars were more likely to reside in the same level as the occlusal plane of the second molars and therefore classified into class A.
Additionally, an analysis of the association of the demographical factors to the occurrence of the impacted third molars was also performed. There is a significant difference (p < 0.001) regarding the occurrence of impacted third molar when associated with age, of which impacted third molars are more likely to occur in those aged 17–30 years old. Those who are 17–30 years old were 1.05 times (CI 95%; 0.88–1.21) more likely to have additional impacted teeth while those who are older than 30 years old have decreased odds ratio (OR: 0.92; CI 95%: 0.65–1.32). In regard to sex, male patients who had impacted third molars were 1.59 times (CI 95%: 0.92–2.11) more likely to have another or additional impacted teeth, while being female decreased the odds ratio up to 0.88 times (CI 95%; 0.76–1.00).

4. Discussion

In general, the association between sex and age on the occurrence of impacted third molars found in the current study is in line with previous studies [11,13,25,26]. The different points of eruption between males and females might contribute to these associations. In research conducted by Rozzi (2016), it was revealed that tooth eruption occurs earlier in females than in males, especially for third molars [27]. Furthermore, in a study conducted by Milos et al. (2021), it was hypothesized that compared to the maxilla, the mandible grows more during the adolescent period and that the phenomenon occurs more in males compared to females. This hypothesis was then confirmed with the findings of their study. They also stated that craniofacial growth in males continues after the age of 18 years old [28]. These differences, of course, have the potential to cause age and sexual differences on impacted third molar occurrences considering that the impacted condition is affected by the availability of space, both in the maxilla and in the mandible.
The current retrospective study was conducted based on the dental records of 885 patients, where more female patients (67.34%; male: female ratio = 1:2.06) were found. This result supports a previous study conducted by Ahmad et al. (2021) and Gebeyehu and Abaynew (2024) where impacted third molars were more common to be found in female than in male patients [13,29]. This is interesting as previous studies [25,30] also showed the predominance of the male sex compared to female. Additionally, it is also interesting to note that in a study conducted by Alfadil and Almajed (2020) in Saudi Arabia on 4000 patients’ orthopantomogram (OPG) radiographs of which 1014 OPGs showed the occurrence of impacted third molars, no gender predominance was identified [9]. In regard to the female predominance, it was hypothesized that this might be influenced by jaw size, hormonal changes, as well as genetic factors [29]. The eruption of the third molar is at a point when the growth of most female jaws reaches completion. On a slightly different note, male jaw growth continues during the eruption of the third molar, potentially providing more adequate room for the third molar to erupt [9].
In regard to age, in this study, the age range was divided between 17 and 30 years old and above 30 years old, with impacted third molars occurring most in the first age range. This particular result is rather similar to the findings of the study conducted by Adeola et al. (2023). In the study of 469 Nigerian patients’ dental records, Adeola et al. (2023) found that impacted third molars are most likely to occur in patients aged between 20 and 29 years old. This predominance may result from the fact that late adolescence and early adulthood are the times when impacted third molars are most likely to emerge [11]. Similarly, Shaari et al. (2023) studied the prevalence of impacted third molars in an Iraqi population and also found that impacted third molars are most likely to occur within the age range of 21 to 30 years old [26].
In the current study, no predominance regarding the maxilla and the mandible was found. This result is different from a previous study conducted by Alfadil and Almajed (2020) where impacted third molars were more commonly found in the mandible compared to the maxilla [9]. In another study conducted by Genç, Orhan, and Hincal (2022) in a North Cyprus population, impacted third molars were also found more in the mandible (70.27%) compared to the maxilla (29.73%) [25].
Clinical evaluation for the third molars’ class in the current study was based on the Pell and Gregory classification [14], with class A being the most common class found for maxillary and mandibular impacted third molars. This result is contradictory to the findings of the study conducted by Ishwarkumar et al. (2019) on a South African population. In their study, Ishwarkumar et al. (2019) found that the most common class based on the Pell and Gregory classification for the third molar impaction found in the mandible is class B (54.4%), followed by class C and class A. While for the third molars found in the maxilla, the most common class was class A, followed by class C and class B [2]. Additionally, a study conducted by Shaari et al. (2023) showed that the most common class found for mandibular impacted third molars based on Pell and Gregory classification is class II followed by class III, and class I being the least common [26]. The findings from Shaari et al.’s study (2023) are in line with the findings of the current study where class II was the most commonly found class amongst mandibular impacted third molar.
Furthermore, the radiographic evaluation on the mandibular impacted third molar in this study showed that the mesioangular position is the most common position found. This finding is in line with a previous study conducted by Adeola et al. (2023) on 469 patients in Nigerian Teaching Hospital, where the mesioangular position is the most common impaction found (36.5%) [11]. The occurrence of mesioangular-impacted third molars has been associated with a high risk of caries development, both in the second and third molars. The mesioangular position has also been associated with periodontal bone loss, distally to the adjacent second molar [31]. Therefore, the removal of mesioangular-impacted third molars in patients should be carefully performed.
In the current study, the radiographic evaluation showed that 67.08% of the impacted maxillary third molar has sinus approximation. This result is in line with a study conducted by Waseem et al. (2021). In their study, Waseem et al. (2021) reported that out of 281 maxillary impacted third molars being investigated, 66.19% showed sinus approximation [32]. Sinus approximation is recognized as one of the risk factors for post-impacted maxillary third-molar removal complications, considering the proximity of the impacted third molar to the sinus floor [33]. The proximity of the sinus floor to the apical part of the posterior teeth in the maxilla is affected by age, sinus pneumatization, and duration of the edentulous condition, aside from other factors [34]. In order to avoid such complications, identification of this condition prior to the removal of the impacted maxillary third molars is important.
The study is not without limitations. Due to the availability of the radiographic examination result, panoramic radiographic analysis was the only radiographic analysis that we could perform. Therefore, we could only conduct our radiographic analysis on two-dimensional panoramic radiography. An analysis of the dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiographic would have provided a more thorough analysis as it provides a three-dimensional result.

5. Conclusions

The current study found that there was no predominance for the occurrence of impacted third molars concerning jaw location. Sex and age predominance were found in this study where women showed a higher prevalence of impacted third molars, while those aged 17 and 30 years old also showed a higher prevalence of impacted third molars, indicating the association of the occurrence of impacted third molars to demographic factors. Radiographic evaluation on mandibular impacted third molars showed that class II is the most found class when it comes to the ramus relationship, and mesioangular position is the most common position. Lastly, class A was the most found class among all impacted third molars.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.; Methodology, I.H. and T.M.; Resources, I.H., M.S. and T.M.; Supervision, T.M.; Validation, M.S., M.P. and T.M.; Visualization, I.H. and T.M.; Writing—original draft, I.H.; Writing—review and editing, M.P., F.M. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

All authors would like to acknowledge Annisa Hasna from the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Padjadjaran, Indonesia, for her kind assistance during the data coding process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jaiswara, C.; Rani, A.; Dhiman, N.K. The rarest cause of impaction of mandibular third molar—A case report. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2016, 6 (Suppl. S1), S55–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ishwarkumar, S.; Pillay, P.; Haffajee, M.; Satyapal, K. Prevalence of impacted third molars in the South African Indian population of the eThekwini Metropolitan Region. S. Afr. Dent. J. 2019, 74, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Varghese, G. Management of Impacted Third Molars. In Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician; Bonanthaya, K., Panneerselvam, E., Manuel, S., Kumar, V.V., Rai, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021; pp. 299–328. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abramovitz, I.; Zakopay, E.; Zini, A.; Chweidan, H.; Balakirski, D.; Protter, N.E.; Almoznino, G. Pre-Operative Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Attending Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar Teeth. Healthcare 2021, 9, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chisci, D.; Parrini, S.; Baldini, N.; Chisci, G. Patterns of Third-Molar-Pericoronitis-Related Pain: A Morphometrical Observational Retrospective Study. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duarte-Rodrigues, L.; Miranda, E.F.P.; Souza, T.O.; de Paiva, H.N.; Falci, S.G.M.; Galvão, E.L. Third molar removal and its impact on quality of life: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual. Life Res. 2018, 27, 2477–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sifuentes-Cervantes, J.S.; Carrillo-Morales, F.; Castro-Núñez, J.; Cunningham, L.L.; Van Sickels, J.E. Third molar surgery: Past, present, and the future. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2021, 132, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ryalat, S.; AlRyalat, S.A.; Kassob, Z.; Hassona, Y.; Al-Shayyab, M.H.; Sawair, F. Impaction of lower third molars and their association with age: Radiological perspectives. BMC Oral Health 2018, 18, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alfadil, L.; Almajed, E. Almajed, Prevalence of impacted third molars and the reason for extraction in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent. J. 2020, 32, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qu, H.; Yang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, Z.; Sun, L.; Chen, F.; Tian, B. Third molar-related knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and medical history of 904 Chinese adults: A cross-sectional survey. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2023, 24, 896–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adeola, O.; Fatusi, O.; Njokanma, A.; Adejobi, A. Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Prevalence and Patterns in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital: A 5-Year Retrospective Study. BioMed 2023, 3, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Gunaid, T.H. Sex-related variation in the dimensions of the mandibular ramus and its relationship with lower third molar impaction. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2020, 15, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Asif, J.; Ahmad, P.; V’Vian, T.; Chaudhary, F.; Chaudhary, A.; Haseeb, A.; Yaqoob, M. Pattern of Third Molar Impactions in North-Eastern Peninsular Malaysia: A 10-Year Retrospective Study. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2021, 24, 1028–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jaroń, A.; Trybek, G. The Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Assessment of Surgery Difficulty: A Retrospective Study of Radiographs in East Baltic Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fernandes, I.A.; Galvão, E.L.; Gonçalves, P.F.; Falci, S.G.M. Impact of the presence of partially erupted third molars on the local radiographic bone condition. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Elkhateeb, S.M.; Awad, S.S. Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2018, 13, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cederhag, J.; Truedsson, A.; Alstergren, P.; Shi, X.-Q.; Hellén-Halme, K. Radiographic imaging in relation to the mandibular third molar: A survey among oral surgeons in Sweden. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 2073–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hagar, A.A.; Helmi, J.M.; Al-Jawfi, K.A.; Al-dilami, A.W.; Al Wesabi, M.A. Prevalence of impacted teeth among a sample of yemeni population and their association with sex and age. J. Oral Res. 2019, 8, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Dajani, M.; Abouonq, A.O.; Almohammadi, T.A.; Alruwaili, M.K.; Alswilem, R.O.; Alzoubi, I.A. A Cohort Study of the Patterns of Third Molar Impaction in Panoramic Radiographs in Saudi Population. Open Dent. J. 2017, 11, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zaman, M.U.; Almutairi, N.S.; Alnashwan, M.A.; Albogami, S.M.; Alkhammash, N.M.; Alam, M.K. Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction in Nonsyndromic 17760 Patients: A Retrospective Study among Saudi Population in Central Region, Saudi Arabia. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 1880750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bali, A.; Bali, D.; Sharma, A.; Verma, G. Is Pederson Index a True Predictive Difficulty Index for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery? A Meta-analysis. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2013, 12, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bhansali, S.P.; Bhansali, S.; Tiwari, A. Review of Difficulty Indices for Removal of Impacted Third Molars and a New Classification of Difficulty Indices. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2021, 20, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, J.-Y.; Yong, H.-S.; Park, K.-H.; Huh, J.-K. Modified difficult index adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J. Korean Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 45, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alsaegh, M.A.; Abushweme, D.A.; Ahmed, K.O.; Ahmed, S.O. The pattern of mandibular third molar impaction and its relationship with the development of distal caries in adjacent second molars among Emiratis: A retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2022, 22, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Genç, B.G.; Orhan, K.; Hıncal, E. Maxillary and Mandibular Third Molars Impaction with Associated Pathologies in a North Cyprus Population: A Retrospective Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. AlRifai, A.S.; Shaari, R.; Nawi, M.A.A.; Khaleel, A.K. Prevalence and pattern of third molars impaction: A retrospective radiographic study. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2023, 14, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rozzi, F.R. Diversity in tooth eruption and life history in humans: Illustration from a Pygmy population. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Miloš, D.; Pavlić, A.; Vandevska-Radunović, V.; Žigante, M.; Matthewson, A.; Špalj, S. Craniofacial Growth in Adolescence and its Influence on the Mandibular Incisor Crowding. Acta Stomatol. Croat. 2021, 55, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Gebeyehu, T.; Abaynew, Y. Prevalence and patterns of third molar impaction among Ethiopians in Addis Ababa: A retrospective pilot study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dubey, M.; Passi, D.; Singh, G.; Dutta, S.; Srivastava, D.; Chandra, L.; Mishra, S.; Srivastava, A. Study of pattern and prevalence of mandibular impacted third molar among Delhi-National Capital Region population with newer proposed classification of mandibular impacted third molar: A retrospective study. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 10, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Altan, A.; Akbulut, N. Does the Angulation of an Impacted Mandibular third Molar Affect the Prevalence of Preoperative Pathoses? J. Dent. 2019, 20, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  32. Waseem, N.; Asim, M.A.; Maqsood, A.; Ghafoor, M.W.; Mirza, N.; Khalid, M.O. Evaluation of Patterns of Impacted Third Molars and Theor Association With Structures by Radiographic Examination. Park. Armed Forces Med. J. 2021, 71, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lim, A.A.; Wong, C.W.; Allen, J.C., Jr. Maxillary third molar: Patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perforation. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 70, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Singh, A.; Kodali, M.V.R.M.; Pentapati, K.C.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Shetty, R.; Patil, V.; Gadicherla, S.; Smriti, K. Role of CBCT in Prediction of Oro-antral Communication Post Third Molar Extraction: A Retrospective Study. Eur. J. Dent. 2023, 17, 1257–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The distribution of patients based on demographic and clinical characteristics.
Table 1. The distribution of patients based on demographic and clinical characteristics.
CategoryParticipant Distribution
Sex
MaleFemale
Age
  17–30 years old203430
  >30 years old86166
Number of impacted teeth
  1–3 teeth93181
  4–6 teeth194415
  >6 teeth20
Types of impacted teeth
  Third molar only271539
  Third molar and other teeth1545
  Teeth other than third molar312
Occurrence of third molars
  Unilateral1742
  Bilateral272554
Age
17–30 years old>30 years old
Number of impacted teeth
  1–3 teeth146128
  4–6 teeth485124
  >6 teeth20
Types of impacted teeth
  Third molar only581229
  Third molar and other teeth4614
  Teeth other than third molar69
Occurrence of third molars
  Unilateral2138
  Bilateral612214
Table 2. Distribution and clinical classification of impacted third molars based on their radiographic interpretation (Pederson classification and sinus approximation method).
Table 2. Distribution and clinical classification of impacted third molars based on their radiographic interpretation (Pederson classification and sinus approximation method).
Right upper third molars (n = 722)
Relative depth *Class AClass BClass CUndefined
288 (39.9%)172 (23.8%)255 (35.3%)7 (1.0%)
Sinus approximationNo sinus approximationSinus approximation Undefined
246 (34.1%)468 (64.8%)8 (1.1%)
Left upper third molars (n = 736)
Relative depthClass AClass BClass CUndefined
290 (39.4%)138 (18.8%)304 (41.3%)4 (0.5%)
Sinus approximationNo sinus approximationSinus approximation Undefined
221 (30%)510 (69.3%)5 (0.7%)
Left lower third molars (n = 785)
Spatial relationship/Position of the impacted molarMesioangularHorizontalVerticalDistoangularInvertedUndefined
301 (38.3%)242 (30.8%)205 (26.1%)8 (1.0%)2 (0.3)27 (3.4%)
Relative depth *Class AClass BClass CUndefined
364 (46.4%)282 (35.9%)112 (14.3%)27 (3.4%)
Ramus relationship/Available space **Class IClass IIClass IIIUndefined
87 (11.1%)632 (80.5%)39 (5.0%)27 (3.4%)
Right lower third molars (n = 776)
Spatial relationship/
Position of the impacted molar		MesioangularHorizontalVerticalDistoangularInvertedUndefined
306 (39.4%)258 (33.2%)182 (23.5%)13 (1.7%)3 (0.4%)14 (1.8%)
Relative depthClass AClass BClass CUndefined
330 (42.5%)286 (36.9%)146 (18.8%)14 (1.8%)
Ramus relationship/Available spaceClass IClass IIClass IIIUndefined
82 (10.6%)630 (81.2%)50 (6.4%)14 (1.7%)
* Relative depth: “Class A: the highest position of the third molar is at the same level or above the occlusal level of second mandibular molar; Class B: the highest position of the third molar is below the occlusal plane but above the cervical line of second mandibular molar; Class C: third molar is below the cervical line of second mandibular molar;” ref. [21] Undefined: position cannot be interpreted radiographically. ** Ramus relationship: “Class I: there is sufficient space between the ramus and distal margin of the second molar for the accommodation of the mesial–distal diameter of the crown of the third molar; Class II: space between the ramus and distal surface of the second molar was less than the mesial–distal diameter of the crown of the lower third molar; Class III: all or most of the third molar lay within the ramus”; ref. [21] undefined: position cannot be interpreted radiographically.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hadikrishna, I.; Sylvyana, M.; Pattamatta, M.; Mulyawati, F.; Maulina, T. Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics Associated with the Occurrence of Impacted Third Molars in Indonesian Patients: A Retrospective Study. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070210

AMA Style

Hadikrishna I, Sylvyana M, Pattamatta M, Mulyawati F, Maulina T. Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics Associated with the Occurrence of Impacted Third Molars in Indonesian Patients: A Retrospective Study. Dentistry Journal. 2024; 12(7):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hadikrishna, Indra, Melita Sylvyana, Madhuri Pattamatta, Folli Mulyawati, and Tantry Maulina. 2024. "Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics Associated with the Occurrence of Impacted Third Molars in Indonesian Patients: A Retrospective Study" Dentistry Journal 12, no. 7: 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop