Next Article in Journal
Influence of Multi-Frequency Ultrasound Treatment on Conformational Characteristics of Beef Myofibrillar Proteins with Different Degrees of Doneness
Next Article in Special Issue
Determining the Optimal Vacuum Frying Conditions for Silver Herring (Spratelloides gracilis) Using the Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ball-Milling on Starch Crystalline Structure, Gelatinization Temperature, and Rheological Properties: Towards Enhanced Utilization in Thermosensitive Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ultrasonic Pretreatment on the Far-Infrared Drying Process and Quality Characteristics of Licorice
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quality Evaluation of Shiitake Blanched and Centrifuged Broths as Functional Instant Drinks

Foods 2023, 12(15), 2925; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152925
by Shin-Yu Chen 1,†, Jim Tseng 2,†, Cheng-Rong Wu 2 and Sheng-Dun Lin 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Foods 2023, 12(15), 2925; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12152925
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 12 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors report the use of shiitake blanched and centrifuged broths for instant drink. The manuscript is well-written, and all discussion are supported by experimental data and references. Moreover, the methods are described in detail. Below are my considerations to improve the quality of the manuscript:

1. Is there any material characterization of the Fibersol-2, BB and CB instant powders.  it will help to understand the materials rather than just showing the real photo of materials. 

2. Did the author performed the test about how long does this BB and CB instant drink retain its color and flavors?

3. Can this method to prepare instant drink to be applied to other type of mushrooms? why the author chooses only shiitake? 

4. The references used in this work are relevant, however, there are too many references are old. please use up to date references. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Abstract

- Use of this term “consumer’s preference” (L#22) is more appropriate when they were asked to compare a sensory attribute between samples.

Introduction

- L#57-60 serves as rationale for this study. Please provide some literature review of similar studies.

- L#76-77, please elaborate in a broader context. Are there any other carrier with similar function to FS-2?

- L#79-79 please check grammar and outline “few studies”.

Materials and Methods

- On 2.2.1 Preparation section, please elaborate on food safety issue.

Results and Discussion

- L#220-221, please elaborate in detail.

Conclusions

- L#482-484, is this conclusion based on authors’ own speculation or the evidence from this study? Functional benefit of both broths should be highlight in both qualitative and quantitative term.

some gramma errors.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Just a kind suggestion (no need to address this comment) that authors may use a CIE1931 figure to visually present the color change of the powder.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop