Next Article in Journal
DNA Barcoding Unveils Novel Discoveries in Authenticating High-Value Snow Lotus Seed Food Products
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant Activity of Bougainvillea spectabilis Bracts as an Alternative to Nitrites in Cooked Pork Ham
Previous Article in Journal
Health Hazard Associated with the Presence of Clostridium Bacteria in Food Products
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Effect of Curcumin on Amino Acid, Fatty Acid, and Volatile Compound Profiles of Chicken Meat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Incorporating Olive By-Products in Bísaro Pig Diets: Effect on Dry-Cured Product Quality

1
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
Laboratório para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
3
IES Andrés de Valdelvira, 02006 Albacete, Spain
4
Animal Science Department, Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(16), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162579
Submission received: 1 July 2024 / Revised: 7 August 2024 / Accepted: 15 August 2024 / Published: 18 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feeding and Processing Affect Meat Quality and Sensory Evaluation)

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to assess the impact of incorporating olive cake into the diet of indigenous Bísaro pigs on the quality of processed meat products. To this end, loins and “cachaços” were processed using a standardized manufacturing flowchart to produce dry-cured products. The two products were manufactured using the same formulation, ingredients, and curing process. Concerning the physicochemical composition, there were significant differences between the two products for the parameters of aw (p < 0.001), moisture (p < 0.001), total fat (p < 0.001), protein (p < 0.001), and haem pigments (p < 0.001). The diet significantly impacted the NaCl content (p < 0.05). However, neither the product nor the diet affected the fractions of saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), or polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed for n-3 (p < 0.05). Adding olive cake increased these fatty acids, and the diet containing 25% centrifuged olive cake showed the highest levels for both products. Compared with the control, the diets containing olive cake had a higher content of n-3 fatty acids, resulting in a lower PUFA n-6/n-3 ratio (p < 0.01).

1. Introduction

The production of olive oil is a well-known phenomenon on a global scale, with an average output of approximately 3 million tons of olive oil per year. Of this total, 2 million tons (or over 67%) are produced by the European Union (EU). Among the EU countries, the largest share of olive production comes from Spain, Italy, Greece, and Portugal. More than half of the total produced in the European Union (66%) comes from Spain. Italy and Greece have very similar productions, with 15% and 13%, respectively. Lastly, Portugal is responsible for 5% of the total produced in the EU. Additionally, the EU is the biggest consumer and exporter of olive oil. The EU is responsible for consuming 50% of annual production, 1.5 million tons of olive oil, and exporting 570,000 tons annually [1].
As a result of the high production of olive oil, many by-products that are highly toxic to the environment are generated. Efficient management of these by-products is necessary to reduce their environmental impact and ensure economic profitability since most of these raw materials, if not disposed of correctly, result in excessively high treatment costs. According to Molina-Alcaide et al. [2], olive oil by-products can be categorized as olive leaves, olive cake, and other by-products. The olive leaves refer to a mixture of leaves and branches from pruning the olive trees and harvesting and cleaning the olives before the oil is extracted [2]. Olive cake consists of olive pulp, skin, stone, and water. The terminology for olive cake varies depending on the extraction methods, such as pressing, extracting, or centrifuging. In the case of centrifugal extraction, it is crucial to distinguish between three-phase and two-phase systems. The main difference is the quantity of oil and moisture, with the two-phase centrifuged olive cake being more efficient and environmentally friendly (with a higher moisture content and lower oil content) [3]. As far as pressed olive cake is concerned, extraction is achieved by a discontinuous press process, a more traditional extraction method. The nutritional valorization of these by-products has become a key focus for various research sectors. While they are widely used in ruminant feed, their application in other animal species remains limited.
Furthermore, these by-products are an energy resource due to their lignin content, providing a high calorific value with a low ash content [4]. Another potential application for this product is composting, which can be used as a fertilizer or a component of agricultural substrates [5]. Olive cake has had various uses but remains an under-exploited resource [2]. The market for commercializing raw materials for animal feed has been significantly constrained by price volatility.
Moreover, incorporating this by-product makes perfect sense in the northern region of Trás-os-Montes (Portugal), given the amount of olive cake produced and the number of farms with Bísara animals. In addition, the time of year when these by-products are obtained coincides with the finishing phase of these animals. Therefore, transporting this by-product is more accessible due to the proximity of the farms and oil mills, and storage is also more accessible. Bísaro pigs offer products characterized by high quality [6]. Due to the characteristics of their meat, native breeds are highly valued for producing high-quality dry-cured products [7].
Consequently, the main objectives of this work are to (1) evaluate the potential of olive cake (pressed and centrifuged) as a diet component for Bísaro pigs; (2) assess effects on the physicochemical composition of the two processed products obtained on an industrial scale; (3) analyze the impact of these products on the fatty acid profile; and (4) examine the influence of cutting the Longissimus thoracis lumborum (LTL) muscle in obtaining the two processed products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Diets and Slaughter Procedure

The animals used were indigenous Bísaro pigs, kept in an extensive system on the farm belonging to the company Bísaro-Salsicharia Tradicional, Lda® (Gimonde-Bragança, Portugal). The first diet consisted of a traditional diet typical of these native breeds in an extensive system, thus considered the control diet. The second diet included the Base diet + 15% of centrifuged olive cake (BgCf15). The third diet consisted of a Base diet + 25% of centrifuged olive cake (BgCf25). The fourth diet consisted of a Base diet + 15% of pressed olive cake. The diets’ chemical composition and fatty acid profile are presented in Table 1.
The Bísara animals were reared under the supervision of the University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro in Vila Real, Portugal. A total of 48 animals were used for this study. The animals were separated into distinct groups to receive different diets (Figure 1). The control group was given a traditional diet for this indigenous breed, consisting of local vegetables, cereals, and feed appropriate for each growth stage. The other diets also had the same Base diet as the control diet, plus the type of olive cake with 15 and 25 percent (see Table 1). The animals were fed these diets during the finishing phase (90 days) and with an average feed of 3 kg daily. The University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro team monitored the animals to ensure the diets were administered correctly throughout the finalization process.
Once the final finishing phase was complete, the animals were slaughtered at 12 months of age, with an average live weight of approximately 135 kg. The Bragança Municipal Slaughterhouse team was responsible for the slaughter. The methodology employed for the slaughter and carcass preparation has been previously described by Álvarez-Rodríguez and Teixeira [8]. All animals were provided with appropriate care and were slaughtered following EU Council Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 [9], which sets out animal welfare regulations at the time of slaughter. After the slaughter and cutting, the joints obtained were transported to Bísaro-Salsicharia Tradicional, Lda®, which was responsible for processing them.

2.2. Dry-Cured Bísaro Loin and “Cachaço”

The curing process was carried out at Bísaro-Salsicharia Tradicional, Lda®, using forty-eight loins and forty-eight “cachaços” from forty-eight slaughtered animals (Figure 2). The ingredients were added in decreasing order: 1.5% salt, 0.5% paprika, 0.5% garlic, and 0.1% oregano. Both the loins and “cachaços” were dry-cured for 60 days. After removing the muscles from the carcasses, the pieces were chilled in a chamber at 2–5 °C, and excess surface fat was removed from each piece. Selected pieces then underwent the curing process. In the salting and seasoning phase, the pieces were placed on a rotating drum for approximately 30 min after adding salt, paprika, garlic, and oregano. After mixing, the joints were transferred to a container and placed in a refrigeration chamber at a temperature range of 2–4 °C with approximately 90% relative humidity for 4 days to allow the ingredients to penetrate. Next, the pieces were stuffed into collagen casings. The final phase was drying and curing, during which significant biochemical changes occurred. The temperature and humidity were adjusted as the curing progressed: for the first 15 days, the cuts were kept at 4–8 °C with 80–90% relative humidity. Subsequently, the temperature was raised to 8–12 °C with 70–80% relative humidity for another 15 days. Finally, for the last 20 days, the product was maintained at 12–18 °C with 60–70% relative humidity. This curing process has been validated by the company Bísaro-Salsicharia Tradicional Lda®, considering all the quality and food safety standards. It should be noted that the company responsible for the entire manufacturing flowchart for this type of product has been certified for over seven years by extremely demanding quality benchmarks (IFS-Food).

2.3. Chemical Composition and Physicochemical Analysis of Dry-Cured Loin and Dry-Cured “Cachaço”

All the physicochemical analyses on these two products were conducted using the following Portuguese standards. Water activity was assessed according to AOAC [10] using a HigroPalm Rotronic 8303 probe (Bassersdorf, Switzerland). Moisture content was determined according to the Portuguese standard NP 1614 [11]. For this, 5 mL of ethanol (96% v/v) was added to 3 g of sample, and the samples were dried in a drying oven (Raypa DO-150, Barcelona, Spain) at 103 ± 2 °C for 24 h. Ash content was determined according to the Portuguese standard [12]. To do this, 1 mL of magnesium acetate (15% w/v) was added to 3 g of sample in crucibles. The samples were then heated to 550 ± 25 °C for 5 h in a muffle furnace (Vulcan BOX Furnace Model 3-550, Yucaipa, CA, USA). Protein content was measured following the Portuguese standard [13] using the Kjeldahl Sampler System (K370, Flawil, Switzerland) and Digest System (K-437, Flawil, Switzerland). In 25 mL of sulfuric acid (97%), two catalyst tablets and 2 g of sample were placed in mineralization tubes. Following the completion of mineralization, the distillation procedure was performed. Subsequently, the distillate was titrated using a hydrochloric acid solution, and the necessary volume was registered. The determination of hydroxyproline and collagen content was carried out by Portuguese Standards NP 1987 [14]. The haem pigment content [15] was determined by measuring the reflectance on the exposed surface using spectroscopy with a Spectronic Unicam 20 Geneys instrument. The results are expressed as mg myoglobin/g fresh muscle. Additionally, the total chloride content was assessed following the methodology specified in the Portuguese Standard NP 1845 [16], expressed as a percentage by mass of sodium chloride.

2.4. Fatty Acid Analysis

Fatty acids in dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” samples were analyzed at the ESA-IPB Laboratory. Total lipids were extracted from 25 g of meat using the Folch procedure [17]. The fatty acid profile was determined from 50 mg of fat. Fatty acids were transesterified following the method described by Domínguez et al. [18]. After adding 4 mL of sodium methoxide solution and vortexing intermittently for 15 min at room temperature, 5 mL of H2SO4 solution (50% in methanol) was added. Then, 2 mL of distilled water was added, followed by additional vortexing. The organic phase, containing the methyl esters of fatty acids, was extracted with 2.35 mL of hexane. The separation and quantification of fatty acid methyl esters were carried out using a gas chromatograph (GC-Shimadzu 2010Plus; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector and an automatic sample injector AOC-20i and using a Supelco SPTM-2560 fused silica capillary column (100 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.2 µm film thickness). Fatty acid contents were calculated using chromatogram peak areas and were expressed as g per 100 g of total fatty acid methyl esters. Additionally, the percentage of saturated fatty acids (ΣSFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (ΣMUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (ΣPUFA), the ratio PUFA n-6/n-3, and Σtrans were calculated according to Vieira et al. [19]. To assess lipid quality, the atherogenicity index (AI) and the thrombogenicity index (IT) were calculated following the Ulbricht and Southgate methods [20].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test data for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Next, the effect of diet and type of product, and the interaction between diet and product, on the physicochemical composition and fatty acid profile were examined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the general linear model (GLM) procedure, in which these parameters were defined as dependent variables and diet and type of product as fixed effects. The results were presented in terms of mean values and standard error of the mean (SEM). When there was a significant effect (p < 0.05), the means were compared using Student’s t-test. To extract a few key combinations (called principal components) from the group of measured variables that capture most of the variability in those variables, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA). Each principal component was determined by linearly combining the correlation matrix’s eigenvectors. The eigenvalues indicate how much variance each component holds. Moreover, a multiple factor analysis (MFA) related to principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to produce a table of eigenvalues, summary plots, and a consensus map. All analyses were performed using the statistical package JMP® Pro 17.0.0 by 2023 SAS Institute Inc.© (Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Composition

The results of the chemical composition of dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” are presented in Table 2. This table shows the effect of the product on each of the parameters studied, the impact between the diets, and the interaction between the type of product and the diet applied. Regarding the interaction between the product and the diets, the parameters aw, ash, and NaCl content showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The other parameters (moisture, total fat, protein, collagen, and haem pigments) did not show significant results between the type of product and the diet applied. The product type significantly affected (p < 0.001) the parameters of aw, moisture, total fat, protein, and haem pigments. On the other hand, collagen, NaCl content, and ash content were not significantly influenced (p > 0.05) by the product type. We can also see that the diet did not affect most of the physicochemical parameters studied, except for the NaCl content.
Concerning water activity (aw), the values obtained for the dry-cured loin ranged from 0.896 to 0.856, while those for the dry-cured “cachaço” ranged from 0.862 to 0.815. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the product and the diet (p < 0.05) for the water activity parameter. The highest value for this parameter (0.896) was observed for the dry-cured loin with the 15% pressed olive cake diet (Pr15), while the lowest value for this parameter was obtained for the dry-cured “cachaço” with the same diet. The aw value was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in all diets (including the control) for the dry-cured loin compared to the dry-cured “cachaço”. These differences in water activity values align with the results obtained for the moisture parameter. The dry-cured loin, influenced by fat content (discussed later), has a lower water activity and moisture content than other forms of dry-cured loin.
The aw value for the dry-cured loin control was the highest, exceeding the values reported for the same product in a study where the olive cake was not added to the diet of the Bísaro pig [21]. In contrast, the aw values observed in this work for diets containing olive cake are consistent with those reported in another study [21] (for the same product type and adding olive cake in other percentages). In previous studies, different authors reported average values of 0.841 for dry-cured Celta loin [22], 0.830 for dry-cured Korean loin [23], 0.838 for dry-cured Polish neck [24], and 0.838 for dry-cured foal loin [25]. Similar water activity values have been reported for other dry-cured products, including dry-cured shoulder [26,27,28,29]. The water activity of a food product is a significant factor that affects the safety of dry-cured meat products. It serves as a fundamental indicator of the shelf life, ensuring nutritional stability and identifying the types of microorganisms present [30]. The combination of water and salt creates osmotic changes that result in dehydration, which removes water from the meat [31]. Water can facilitate the attachment of a radical species and the removal of hydrogen from the fatty acids, thereby initiating the oxidation process [22]. Therefore, both products exhibited water activity values that align with the criteria for dry-cured products with the desired microbiological stability. Furthermore, adding olive cake to the Bísaro pig feed did not exert any discernible influence, whether positive or negative. Another crucial parameter that serves as an indicator of product ripeness is moisture content.
The moisture content of the dry-cured loin was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of the dry-cured “cachaço”. The mean moisture content of the dry-cured loin ranged from 40.02 to 42.73%. Meanwhile, the dry-cured “cachaço” range was 30.99 to 33.43%. Including olive cake in the animals’ diet did not result in any observable change in moisture content. The moisture content of dry-cured products is inversely proportional to the maturation time [32]. The values obtained in this study were higher for both products than those observed by other authors [21]. Nevertheless, comparable values to those observed in the dry-cured “cachaço” have been documented in a conventional dry-cured product from Spain’s Mediterranean coast [33] and in the traditional Italian product “coppa” [34]. Similar values (42%) were obtained for Iberian dry-cured loins [34,35], as well as for other dry-cured loins [22,25,36].
The observed variations in ash content are primarily attributed to the sodium chloride content. The ash values exhibited a range of 4.25 to 7.21 for dry-cured loin and 4.97 to 6.13 for dry-cured “cachaço.” The interaction between the product and diet was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, introducing the olive cake diet or the type of product used did not result in significant differences in ash content. Other studies have reported higher ash values for dry-cured foal loin [25], “, Bísaro dry-cured shoulder [29], and Celta dry-cured ham [37]. Similar values have been observed in other studies involving Iberian dry-cured loin [38] and Turkish dried meat [39].
The total fat content exhibited a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”, with values ranging from 16.90 to 24.62% and from 36.59 to 43.37%, respectively. Concerning dietary factors, no impact was observed on the total fat content of the processed products. Although these two products originate from the same Longissimus thoracis lumborum (LTL) muscle, they are derived from disparate sections. The “cachaço” is obtained from the proximal region of the LTL muscle, situated in the cervical area of the column and extending to the fifth thoracic vertebra, as evidenced by its location beneath the scapula. The loin is obtained from the lumbar region of the LTL muscle. The high complexity of the meat matrix results in products derived from the same muscle exhibiting markedly disparate values for the total fat parameter.
A reduction in protein content is anticipated to accompany an elevated fat content. As demonstrated in Table 2, the protein content was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the dry-cured loin, with mean values ranging between 29.73 and 34.26%. In contrast, the dry-cured “cachaço” exhibited lower protein values, ranging from 23.40% to 24.99%. The application of the olive by-product diets did not result in any discernible impact on the protein content of the products under investigation. Other studies have also observed this difference between dry-cured loin and “cachaço” [21]. A product designated as dry-cured coppa exhibited similar values to those observed in the dry-cured “cachaço” [34]. The same values have also been reported by other authors for Turkish dried meat [39], dry-cured Celta ham [37], and Bísaro dry-cured shoulder [29]. Higher values were observed in the case of the dry-cured foal [25].
No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between diets with olive cake or between the two product types concerning collagen content, which ranged from 2.83 to 3.66% and from 2.55 to 3.15% in the dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”, respectively.
The total haem pigments, expressed as myoglobin concentration, exhibited a statistically significant difference between the two products (Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”). The myoglobin content for these products ranged from 2.15 to 2.72 mg/g and 3.84 to 4.33 mg/g in the case of the dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”, respectively. The incorporation of pressed and centrifuged olive cake did not affect this parameter, as evidenced by the findings of other researchers [21].
Significant differences were observed in the chloride content for the interaction between diet and type of product (p < 0.001) and for the addition of olive cake (p < 0.05). The sodium chloride content exhibited variability, ranging from 2.76 to 6.53% in the dry-cured loin and from 4.01 to 5.36% in the dry-cured “cachaço”. The highest salt content was observed in the dry-cured loin with the centrifuged olive cake diet at 25%. This value represents the ash content observed in the Cf25 diet in the dry-cured loin. Although a difference in the salt content of the dry-cured loin was observed, it cannot be definitively concluded that the 25% olive cake inclusion was the sole factor responsible for this value. This same pattern was not observed in the dry-cured “cachaço” case. The average NaCl value for the dry-cured loin was lower than that of the dry-cured “cachaço”. The dry-cured loin (Cf25) exhibited a markedly elevated value, resulting from a notable diet impact. It is imperative to reiterate that these products were not manufactured in a laboratory setting. Therefore, it is not possible to attribute the high levels of sodium chloride observed solely to the diet. Similar NaCl content values were observed in Salame Milano (4.3%), Coppa (5.9%), Parma Ham (6.1%) [40], and dry-cured foal “Cecina” [41].

3.2. Fatty Acids Composition

The fatty acid (FA) composition of the dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” is presented in Table 3 for analysis purposes. The table illustrates the impact of the product and the effect between diets on the fatty acid profile. For both products, the predominant fatty acids were oleic acid as monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), palmitic acid, stearic acid as saturated fatty acid (SFA), and linoleic acid as polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). These four acids account for more than 93% of the total fatty acids in both products. These results align with pork’s typical fatty acid composition and are consistent with the fatty acid profile described by Leite et al. [42]. A comparable pattern in FA distribution has been documented in various types of dry-cured products [21,34,43,44,45,46,47]. Except for C18:0 fatty acid, no significant differences were observed in the remaining predominant fatty acids between the two products studied. The addition of olive cake to the animal diets had no discernible impact. Significant differences were observed between the products for the following FA: C15:0, C17:0, C18:0, C20:0, C18:3n-6, C22:0, C23:0, and n-3. As for the diet, the inclusion of olive cake in the animal diet of Bísaro pigs had a significant influence on the following FA: C16:1n-7, 9t-C18:1, C20:1n-9, C18:3n-3, C20:2n-6, n-3, and ratio n-6/n-3. The FA fractions were not affected by the type of product studied. Similarly, adding centrifuged and pressed olive cake in 15 and 25% percentages did not influence the lipid quality of dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”. Therefore, despite numerous factors that can affect the lipid composition of meat, such as diet and genetic lineage, the fatty acid profile of pork remains consistent with the typical pork profile.
Concerning MUFAs, oleic acid was the most prevalent FA, representing approximately 93% of the total MUFA content. This high proportion is significant for both products and represents an essential nutritional aspect, as this fatty acid fraction has been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular risk factors [48]. Furthermore, MUFA has been shown to reduce plasma LDL cholesterol levels without compromising the anti-atherogenic properties of HDL cholesterol lipoproteins [49]. Oleic acid levels ranged from 51.11 to 52.15% in the dry-cured loin and from 51.15 to 51.95% in the dry-cured “cachaço”, and these levels remained unchanged with the introduction of olive cake. Although the chemical composition of these two products showed significant differences in total fat content (Table 2), there were no differences between the two products regarding oleic acid. Similar MUFA were observed in Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” [21]. Other authors have reported higher values of this acid in Iberian ham [50], Iberian dry-cured loin [34], dry-cured “coppa” [34], and Bísaro shoulder [29]. Lower MUFA values were reported in Iberian “lacón” [51], Korean dry-cured loin [23], Italian dry-cured loin [47], and Celta dry-cured ham [43].
Regarding SFA, the predominant FA was palmitic acid, showing levels of around 63% of the total SFA. Like oleic acid, palmitic acid levels were unaffected by the product type or olive cake’s inclusion in the diet. We obtained values of between 40.52 and 41.52% for the dry-cured loin and 40.55–41.16% for the dry-cured “cachaço”. The SFA fraction was also not influenced by adding olive cake, and there were no significant differences between the two products regarding palmitic acid content. Similar SFA was observed in Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” [21], and Iberian dry-cured loin [52]. Lower values for this fraction were obtained in Bísaro shoulder [29], Celta dry-cured loin [44], Iberian lacón [51], Iberian and Serrano Ham, Bayonne and Corsican Ham, Parma, and San Daniele Ham, Jingua Ham [49], and dry-cured “coppa” [34]. Other authors have reported higher values of SFA in Korean dry-cured loin [23] and Croatian and Montenegrin dry-cured meat [46]. In agreement with other authors [53,54] about SFA, mortality rates correlated positively with the average percentage of dietary energy from saturated fatty acids.
For PUFAs, linoleic acid was the predominant FA, accounting for more than 95% of the total PUFA content. The levels of linoleic acid were unaffected by the product type or the olive cake’s inclusion in the animal diet. Similar PUFA were observed in Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” [21], Korean dry-cured loin [23], and Croatian and Montenegrin Prosciutto [46]. Other authors have reported higher values of PUFA in Bísaro shoulder [29], Celta dry-cured “lacón” [51], Iberian and Serrano dry-cured loin, Bayonne and Corsican Ham, Parma and San Daniele Ham, Jingua Ham [49], Pancetta and Croatian and Montenegrin dry-cured sirloin [46], and dry-cured “coppa” [34]. Lower values for this fraction were obtained in Iberian dry-cured loin [52]. It should be noted that PUFA is highly susceptible to oxidative degradation and is converted into other molecules [55]. For this reason, the curing process reduces the PUFA content in the final product. Adding a by-product such as olive cake did not counteract this reduction in unsaturated fatty acid.
Compared to previous studies’ findings [21], including a higher percentage of olive cake (centrifuged and pressed) does not influence the MUFA, SFA, and PUFA fractions.
Regarding trans fatty acids, no significant differences were observed between the two product types (p > 0.05), with average values of 0.21 for dry-cured loin and 0.20 for dry-cured “cachaço”. These values are below the recommended levels [56] and lower than those reported by other authors for processed Iberian dry-cured ham [57] and Bísaro shoulders [29]. Nevertheless, significantly lower values were observed in the group that consumed a diet including 25% centrifuged olive cake. Compared to the control diet, the diet containing 25% olive cake (Cf25) resulted in more favorable trans fatty acid values. In contrast, the diet with 15% centrifuged olive cake and 15% pressed olive cake exhibited detrimental outcomes concerning this category of trans fatty acid.
The PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 ratios, along with the IT and IA indices, are important indicators of the healthiness of fat in food. The recommended PUFA/SFA ratio for a healthy diet is 0.4 or less [58]. For the ratio n-6/n-3, the internationally recommended value for a healthy diet is 4 [59], with the optimal value being 1 [60,61,62]. Genetic modification and dietary changes have proven to be relatively effective strategies for achieving more desirable n-6/n-3 values in these products [43]. There was no significant difference in the n-6/n-3 ratio between the two products studied.
On the other hand, the diets applied with olive cake proved to be significantly different (p < 0.05). From the results shown in Table 3, adding olive cake to the animals’ diets significantly reduces the n-6/n-3 ratio. This trend was not observed in other studies for Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” with 10% olive cake added [21]. Therefore, we can say that introducing a percentage of 15 and 25% olive cake in the animal diet contributes to a decrease in this ratio. Higher values of this ratio were observed in Iberian and Parma dry-cured ham [49]. However, significantly lower values were observed in Serrano dry-cured ham, Bayonne dry-cured ham, and Corsican dry-cured ham [49]. Unsaturated fats, especially PUFAs, are well known as healthy fats with critical bodily functions, such as cell growth and development and disease prevention [63]. Although linoleic acid is an essential fatty acid, it should be noted that an excessively high intake of this PUFA may not be beneficial. Studies [64,65] have shown that excessive intake of linoleic acid has a pro-inflammatory effect. Fatty acids n-6 promote vasoconstriction and the formation of blood clots, while n-3 acids have the opposite effect [66]. Among the PUFA n-3, docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3, DHA) is preventive and therapeutic in some chronic inflammatory diseases [67]. In small quantities, these FAs are crucial for the correct cerebral and visual development of the fetus and the maintenance of neural and visual tissues throughout life [67]. The human body cannot synthesize this n-3 FA (DHA) type, which is only obtained through food [68]. This study revealed significant variations in the level of PUFA n-3 based on both the type of product and the diet used. The n-3 content increased with olive cake in the diet, containing 25% centrifuged olive cake, resulting in the highest n-3 values for both products. For dry-cured “cachaço”, n-3 values ranged from 0.26 to 0.33, whereas for dry-cured loin, the values were lower, ranging from 0.22 to 0.28.
A lower IA value is indicative of a reduced saturated-to-unsaturated fatty acid ratio, whereas a lower IT value is associated with a diminished risk of developing blood clots [69]. No significant differences were observed between the two product types regarding the IA and IR indices, nor was there any impact from the olive cake diets. Although no entity or organization provides reference values for these indices [70], it is generally understood that lower IA and IT values indicate better nutritional quality, potentially reducing the risk of coronary heart disease. Lower values for these indices have been reported in dry-cured “coppa” of Nero Siciliano pig [34] and Bísaro shoulder [29]. Similar values were obtained for Bísaro dry-cured loin and “cachaço” in animals fed with olive cake [21]. Other authors have reported that the intramuscular fat and backfat indices were affected by including 10% olive cake in the pig’s diet, increasing the MUFA and PUFA content and improving the IA and IT quality indices [71]. As reported by Cava et al. [72], an elevated h/H ratio indicates enhanced nutritional adequacy of the fat content in the food. In this study, the ratio h/H was not influenced by the diets applied or the product type (p > 0.05). The dry-cured loin obtained values between 2.00 and 2.09 and the dry-cured “cachaço” between 2.00 and 2.07. Lower values of this ratio were obtained in Bísaro dry-cured loin and “cachaço” [21]. Higher h/H values were observed in Celtic ham with a chestnut-based diet [43]. In the case of fresh pork, different cuts of meat obtained different h/H ratio values [73]. Therefore, not only the type of feed but also the joint influences this ratio. Considering the value obtained for fresh loin (2.170) [73], the curing process does not affect this nutritional index.

3.3. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a statistical technique used to simplify a dataset by transforming the original variables into a smaller set of new variables, called principal components, which capture the essential characteristics of the data. These principal components are linear combinations of the original variables that maximize the total variance. The primary graphical output of PCA is often a biplot, which maps the cases using the principal components and includes the original variables to help interpret the distances between case positions [74]. Figure 3 displays the results of the principal component analysis in the form of a biplot. The first principal component (p < 0.001) explained 40% of the total variance, and the second principal component (p < 0.001) explained 24.7% of the total variance. The two principal components explained the total variance of 64.7%. This principal component analysis shows a separation between the dry-cured loin and the dry-cured “cachaço”. The physicochemical characteristics that best explain the dry-cured loin are salt content, total fat, and haem pigments. On the other hand, water activity, protein content, and moisture are the factors that best explain the dry-cured loin. That said, the principal component analysis shows that although the two products (dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”) come from the same muscle (Longissimus thoracis Lumborum), their chemical composition is very different.

4. Conclusions

The results indicate that incorporating centrifuged and pressed olive cake in different percentages does not impact the physicochemical properties of dry-cured products. However, significant differences were observed between the two products, particularly in total fat, protein, aw, moisture, and haem pigments. Significant interactions between the product and diet were also observed for aw, ash, and NaCl parameters. This suggests that, despite both products originating from the same muscle (LTL), they are distinct, which can enhance their appeal to consumers. Adding olive cake significantly improved the n-3 content, with the olive cake with the highest percentage (Cf25) obtaining the highest n-3 value. These values influenced the PUFA n-6/n-3 ratio, showing the same trend, with significantly lower results in olive cake diets. There are no further differences in the different fatty acid fractions and nutritional quality indices. Still, it would be necessary for future work to understand how n-3 can influence the stability of the product and how these differences can affect the final product’s organoleptic properties and consumer acceptability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.; methodology, A.L. and L.V.; formal analysis, A.L., L.V., S.L. and D.O.-M., investigation, A.L., L.V. and S.R.; data curation, A.L., L.V., S.L., D.O.-M., V.P., S.R. and A.T.; validation: A.L., L.V. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing S.R. and A.T.; supervision, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support through national funds FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020 and UIDP/00690/2020) and SusTEC (LA/P/0007/2020). The authors are also grateful to GAIN (Axencia Galega de Innovación) for supporting this article (grant number IN607A2019/01) and to Laboratory of Carcass and Meat Quality of Agriculture School of Polytechnic Institute of Bragança ‘Cantinho do Alfredo’. Grants of A.L. and L.V. are due to NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-072234. The authors (S.R., J.M.L., R.D, and A.T.) are members of the Healthy Meat network, funded by CYTED (ref: 119RT0568). This study is part of a project between a research center (Carcass and Meat Quality and Technology Laboratory of Agrarian School of Bragança) and a meat manufacturing industry (Bísaro Salsicharia Tradicional®) to develop and add value to animals reared in the extensive system and to create new processed meat products.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animals were cared for and slaughtered in compliance with the welfare regulations and respecting EU Council Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the protocol approved by the ORBEA (Animal Welfare Body) of the University Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (2253-e-DZ-2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission. Producing 69% of the World’s Production, the EU Is the Largest Producer of Olive Oil. 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/plants-and-plant-products/plant-products/olive-oil_en (accessed on 18 April 2024).
  2. Molina-Alcaide, R.; Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R. Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: A review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Albuquerque, J.A.; Gonzalez, J.; García, D.; Cegarra, J. Agrochemical characterization of “alperujo”, a solid by-product of the two-phase centrifugation method for olive oil extraction. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 91, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oktay, Z. Olive Cake as a Biomass Fuel for Energy Production. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2006, 28, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Coelho, L.; Portela, C.; Cravo, A.; Reis, M. Valorização do bagaço de azeitona por compostagem, para utilização agrícola. V Simpósio Nacional de Olivicultura, 14:133-140. Escola Superior Agrária de Santarém, 25 e 26 de Setembro. Actas Port. Hortic. 2009, 14, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  6. Teixeira, A.; Rodrigues, S. Consumer perceptions towards healthier meat products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 38, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lorenzo, J.M.; Montes, R.; Purriños, L.; Cobas, N.; Franco, D. Fatty acid composition of Celta pig breed as influenced by sex and location of fat in the carcass. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Álvarez-Rodríguez, J.; Teixeira, A. Slaughter weight rather than sex affects carcass cuts and tissue composition of Bísaro pigs. Meat Sci. 2019, 154, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Council Regulation (EC)-Official Journal of the European Communities No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. 2009, pp. 1–30. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32009R1099 (accessed on 23 April 2024).
  10. AOAC International; Cunniff, P. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed.; The Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; ISBN 9780935584547. [Google Scholar]
  11. NP 1614/2002; Determination of Moisture Content. Reference Method (ISO 1442:1197). In Portuguese Norm–Meat and Meat Products. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Ministry of Economy and Innovation: Caparica, Portugal, 2002.
  12. NP-ISO-1615/2002; Determination of Total Ashes. Reference Method. In Portuguese Norm–Meat and Meat Products. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Ministry of Economy and Innovation: Caparica, Portugal, 2002.
  13. NP 1612/2002; Determination of Total Nitrogen Content. Reference Method (ISO 937:1978). In Portuguese Norm–Meat and Meat Products. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Ministry of Economy and Innovation: Caparica, Portugal, 2002.
  14. NP 1987/2002; Carnes e Produtos Cárneos; Determinação do teor em Hidroxiprolina. (Método de Referência). In Portuguese Norm–Meat and Meat Products. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Ministry of Economy and Innovation: Caparica, Portugal, 2002.
  15. Hornsey, H.C. The colour of cooked cured pork. I-Estimation of the nitric oxide-haem pigments. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1956, 7, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. NP 1845/1982; Meat and Meat Products—Determination of Chloride Content—Standard Method. Portuguese Institute of Quality, Ministry of Economy Innovation: Caparica, Portugal, 1982.
  17. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G.H.S. A simple method for isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dominguez, R.; Borrajo, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. The effect of cooking methods on nutritional value of foal meat. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2015, 43, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vieira, C.; Sarmiento-García, A.; García, J.J.; Rubio, B.; Martínez, B. Quality and Shelf Life of Fresh Meat from Iberian Pigs as Affected by a New Form of Presentation of Oleic Acid and an Organic-Acid Mix in the Diet. Foods 2021, 10, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ulbricht, T.L.V.; Southgate, D.A.T. Coronary heart disease: Seven dietary factors. Lancet 1991, 338, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leite, A.; Vasconcelos, L.; Ferreira, I.; Domínguez, R.; Pereira, E.; Rodrigues, S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Teixeira, A. Effect of the inclusion of olive cake in the diet on the physicochemical characteristics of dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço” of Bísaro pig. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pateiro, M.; Franco, D.; Carril, J.A.; Lorenzo, J.M. Changes on physico-chemical properties, lipid oxidation and volatile compounds during the manufacture of Celta dry-cured loin. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 4808–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seong, P.N.; Park, K.M.; Kang, G.H.; Cho, S.H.; Park, B.Y.; Ba, H.V. The impact of ripening time on Technological quality traits, chemical change and Sensory characterisictics of dry-cured loin. Asian Australas. J. Animal Sci. 2015, 28, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Libera, J.; Kononiuk, A.; Keska, P.; Wójciak, K. Use of grape seed extract as a natural antioxidant additive in dry-cured pork neck technology. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2018, 82, 141–150. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lorenzo, J.M.; Carballo, J. Changes in physico-chemical properties and volatile compounds throughout the manufacturing process of dry-cured foal loin. Meat Sci. 2015, 99, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Asensio, M.; Silva, A.; Armenteros, M.; Caballero, D.; Martín, N.; Lorido, L.; Sánchez-Montero, L.; Fernandez, C.; Noguera, J.L.; Ramos, M. Quality evaluation of dry-cured shoulder from different genetic lines of Iberian pigs. Arch. Zootec. 2018, 67, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Caballero, D.; Asensio, M.; Fernández, C.; Reina, R.; García, M.J.; Noguera, J.L.; Silva, A. Effects of genotypes and crossbreeding on the quality parameters of dry-cured shoulders from different Iberian genetic pig lines. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cardoso-Toset, F.; Luque, I.; Morales-Partera, A.; Galán-Relaño, A.; Barrero-Domínguez, B.; Hernández, M.; Gómez-Laguna, J. Survival of Streptococcus suis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Trueperella pyogenes in dry-cured Iberian pork shoulders and loins. Food Microbiol. 2017, 61, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leite, A.; Vasconcelos, L.; Ferreira, I.; Sarmiento-García, A.; Domínguez, R.; Santos, E.M.; Campagnol, P.C.B.; Rodrigues, S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Teixeira, A. Chemical, physicochemical and sensorial characterization of nitrite-free dry Bísaro shoulders. Foods 2022, 11, 3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Barbora-Cánovas, G.V.; Fontana, A.J.; Schmidt, S.-J.; Labuza, T.P. Water Activity in Foods: Fundamentals and Aplications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; p. 640. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dimakopoulou-Papazoglou, D.; Katsanidis, E. Effect of maltodextrin, sodium chloride, and liquid smoke on the mass transfer kinetics and storage stability of osmotically dehydrated beef meat. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2017, 10, 2034–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Andres, A.I.; Ventanas, S.; Ventanas, J.; Cava, R.; Ruiz, J. Physicochemcial changes throughout the ripening of dry-cured hams with different salt content and processing conditions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sánchez-Parra, M.; Ordónez-Díaz, J.L.; Pérez-Aparicio, J.; Moreno-Rojas, J. Physicochemical and microbiological changes associated with processing in dry-cured Tuna. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Di Rosa, A.; Zumbo, A.; Furfaro, M.E.; Carcione, G.; D’Angelo, G.; Chiofalfo, V. Effect of two different rearing systems on quality of dry cured “Coppa” of Nero Siliciano pig. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 10–12 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ortiz, A.; Tejerina, D.; Contador, R.; Andrés, A.I.; Petrón, M.J.; Cáceres-Nevado, J.M.; García-Torres, S. Quality traits of dry-cured loins from Iberian pigs reared in Montanera system as affected by pre- freezing cure. Foods 2021, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vargas-Ramella, M.; Domínguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Franco, D.; Barba, J.F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Chemical and physico-chemical changes during the dry-cured processing of deer loin. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bermúdez, R.; Franco, I.; Franco, D.; Carballo, J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Physochemical changes during manufacture and final sensory characteristics of dry-cured Celta ham. Effect of muscle type. Food Control 2014, 43, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Soto, E.; Hoz, L.; Ordóñez, J.A.; Hierro, E.; Herranz, B.; López-Bote, C.; Cambero, M.I. Impact of feeding and rearing systems of Iberian pigs ion volatile profile and sensory characteristics of dry-cured loin. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gençcelep, H.; Ihtiyar, B.; Yüzer, M.O. Determination of quality properties of kastamonu pastirma: A dry-cured meat product. Harran Tarim. ve Gida Bilimleri Derg. 2022, 26, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zanardi, E.; Novelli, E.; Ghiretti, G.P.; Chizzolini, R. Oxidative stability of lipids and cholesterol in salame Milano, coppa and Parma ham: Dietary supplementation with vitamin E and oleic acid. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cittadini, A.; Domínguez, R.; Gómez, B.; Pateiro, M.; Pérez-Santaescolástica, C.; López-Fernández, O.; Sarriés, M.V.; Lorenzo, J.M. Effect of NaCl replacement by other chloride salts on physicochemical parameters, proteolysis and lipolysis of dry-cured foal “Cecina”. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 57, 1628–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leite, A.; Domínguez, R.; Vasconcelos, L.; Ferreira, I.; Pereira, E.; Pinheiro, V.; Outor-Monteiro, D.; Rodrigues, S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Santos, E.M.; et al. Can the Introduction of Different Olive Cakes Affect the Carcass, Meat and Fat Quality of Bísaro Pork? Foods 2022, 11, 1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bermúdez, R.; Franco, I.; Franco, D.; Carballo, J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Influence of inclusion of chestnut in the finishing diet on fatty acid profile of dry-cured ham from Celta pig breed. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gómez, M.; Cachaldora, A.; Fonseca, S.; Domínguez, R.; Carballo, J.; Franco, I. Biochemical, oxidative, and lipolytic changes during vacuum-packed storage of dry-cured loin: Effect of chestnuts intake by Celta pigs. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 7690501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Contador, R.; Ortiz, A.; Ramírez, M.R.; García-Torres, S.; López-Parra, M.M.; Tejerina, D. Physico-chemical and sensory qualities of Iberian sliced dry-cured loins from various commercial categories and the effect of the type of packaging and refrigeration time. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 141, 110876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pleadin, J.; Lesic, T.; Vujacic, V.; Milicevic, D.; Buneta, A.; Susnic, S.; Lukanic, I.; Kresic, G. Comparison of Chemical composition and fatty acid profile traditional meat products from Croatian and Montenegro. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 5586436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Colonna, M.A.; Tarricone, S.; Giannico, F.; Selvaggi, M.; Carriero, F.; Crupi, P.; Corbo, F.; Clodoveo, M.L. Dietary effects of extra virgin olive oil extracted by ultrasound technology or refined olive oil on the quality traits of pork and “Capocollo di Martina Franca” dry-cured met. Animals 2021, 11, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Baum, S.J.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Willett, W.C.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Rudel, L.L.; Maki, K.C.; Whelan, J.; Ramsden, C.E.; Block, R.C. Fatty acids in cardiovascular health and disease: A comprehensive update. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2012, 6, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiménez-Colmenero, F.; Ventanas, J.; Toldrá, F. Nutritional composition of dry-cured ham and its role in a healthy diet. Meat Sci. 2010, 84, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cavas, R.; Ruiz, J.; Ventanas, J.; Antequera, T. Effect of α-tocopheryl acetate supplementation and the extensive feeding of pigs on the volatile aldehydes during the maturation of Iberian ham. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 1999, 5, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Jesús, M.C.; Domínguez, R.; Cantalapiedra, J.; Iglesias, A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Effect of the amount of chestnuts in the diet of Celta pigs on the fatty acid profile of dry-cured lacon. Grasas Y Aceites 2016, 67, 119. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ortiz, A.; González, E.; García-Torres, S.; Gaspar, P.; Tejerina, D. Do animal slaughter age and pre-cure freezing have a significant impact on the quality of Iberian dry-cured pork loin? Meat Sci. 2021, 179, 108531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Keys, A.; Mienotti, A.; Karvonen, M.J.; Aravanis, C.; Blackburn, H.; Buzina, R.; Djordjevic, B.S.; Dontas, A.S.; Fidanza, F.; Keys, M.H. The Diet and 15-Year Death Rate in the Seven Countries Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1986, 124, 903–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Keys, A. Seven Countries: A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Coronary Heart Disease; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980; pp. xi+381. ISBN 0-674-80237-3. [Google Scholar]
  55. Domínguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Gagaoua, M.; Barba, F.J.; Zhang, W.; Lorenzo, J.M. A comprehensive review on lipid oxidation in meat and meat products. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. WHO and FAO. Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (Report of a joint WHO and FAO Expert Consulation). WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 2003, 916, 1–160. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bayés-García, L.; Tres, A.; Vichi, S.; Calvet, T.; Cuevas-Diarte, M.A.; Codony, R.; Boatella, J.; Caixach, J.; Ueno, S.; Guardiola, F. Authentication of Iberian dry-cured ham: New approaches by polymorphic fingerprint and ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry. Food Control 2016, 60, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. UK Department of Health. Report on health and social subjects No. 46. In Nutritional Aspects of Cardiovascular Disease; HMSO: London, UK, 1994; p. 51. [Google Scholar]
  59. World Health Organization. Interim summary of conclusions and dietary recommendations on total fat and fatty acids. In Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Fats and Fatty Acids in Human Nutrition, 10 to 14 November; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  60. British Nutrition Foundation. Unsaturated Fatty Acids: Nutritional and Physiological Significance: The Report from the British Nutrition Foundation’s Task Force; Chapman and Hall, Ltd.: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  61. Simopoulos, A. An Increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio Increases the Risk for Obesity. Nutrients 2016, 8, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Simopoulos, A.P. Evolutionary aspects of the dietary Omega-6:Omega-3 fatty acid ratio: Medical implications. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 2009, 100, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  63. Simopoulos, A.P. ω-3 fatty acids in the prevention management of cardiovascular disease. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1997, 75, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Maekawa, S.; Takada, S.; Nambu, H.; Furihata, T.; Kakutani, N.; Setoyama, D.; Ueyanagi, Y.; Kang, D.; Sabe, H.; Kinugawa, S. Linoleic acid improves assembly of the CII subunit and CIII2/CIV complex of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system in heart failure. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zong, G.; Liu, G.; Willett, W.C.; Wanders, A.J.; Alssema, M.; Zock, P.L.; Hu, F.B.; Sun, Q. Associations between Linoleic Acid Intake and Incident Type 2 Diabetes among U.S. Men and Women. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lands, W.E.M. Fish, Omega-3, and Human Health, 2nd ed.AOCS Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  67. Singh, M. Essential fatty acids, DHA and human brain. Indian J. Pediatr. 2005, 72, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wertz, P.W. Essential fatty acids and dietary stress. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2009, 25, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Razmaite, V.; Švirmickas, G.J.; Šiukšcius, A.U. Effect of Weight, Sex and Hunting Period on Fatty Acid Composition of Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Fat from Wild Boar. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 11, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, J.; Liu, H. Nutritional Indices for Assessing Fatty acids: A Mini-Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liotta, L.; Chiofalo, V.; Presti, L.V.; Chiofalo, B. In vivo performances, carcass traits, and meat quality of pigs fed olive cake processing waste. Animals 2019, 9, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cava, R.; Estévez, M.; Ruiz, J.; Morcuende, D. Physicochemical characteristics of three muscles from free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kg live weight. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Covaciu, F.D.; Feher, I.; Cristea, G.; Dehelean, A. Nutritional quality and safety assessment of pork meat cut from Romania: Fatty acids and Elemental profile. Foods 2024, 13, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Greenacre, M.; Groenen, P.J.F.; Hastie, T.; d’Enza, A.I.; Markos, A.; Tuzhilina, E. Principal component analysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2022, 2, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the diets applied to the Bísaro pigs.
Figure 1. Schematic of the diets applied to the Bísaro pigs.
Foods 13 02579 g001
Figure 2. Process of obtaining Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”.
Figure 2. Process of obtaining Bísaro dry-cured loin and dry-cured “cachaço”.
Foods 13 02579 g002
Figure 3. Biplot principal component analysis (C-dry-cured “cachaço”; L-dry-cured loin).
Figure 3. Biplot principal component analysis (C-dry-cured “cachaço”; L-dry-cured loin).
Foods 13 02579 g003
Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets (g/kg, as fed basis) and fatty acids composition (g/100 g).
Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets (g/kg, as fed basis) and fatty acids composition (g/100 g).
Diets
ControlBgCf15BgCf25BgPr15
Chemical composition of the diet
DM86.3583.7690.7788.40
OM94.7395.3595.0395.00
NDF20.0627.4736.6327.50
ADF7.6212.3123.6713.97
ADL2.494.789.625.75
PB12.3111.1813.7810.94
GB5.746.754.515.86
Fatty acids (g/100 g)
ΣSFA15.2712.8816.2811.91
ΣMUFA23.8059.3241.7156.69
ΣPUFA22.259.1825.117.27
n-6/n-317.187.7714.087.57
DM—dry matter; OM—organic matter; NDF—neutral detergent fiber; ADF—acid detergent fiber; ADL: acid detergent lignin; PB—crude protein; GB—crude fat. C—control; BgCf15—Base diet + 15% olive cake two-phases; BgCf25—Base diet + 25% olive cake two-phases; and BgPr15—Base diet + 15% crude olive cake.
Table 2. Physicochemical composition of dry-cured Bísaro loin and dry-cured Bísaro “cachaço”.
Table 2. Physicochemical composition of dry-cured Bísaro loin and dry-cured Bísaro “cachaço”.
Physicochemical Composition (g/100 g)
awMoistureAshTotal FatProteinCollagenHaem PigmentsNaCl
LCLCLCLCLCLCLCLC
Control0.8930.85741.2731.245.074.9721.4041.0932.6124.523.443.152.314.173.754.24
Cf150.8730.83942.7333.434.985.9619.0336.5932.2424.993.352.552.154.333.555.01
Cf 250.8660.86240.0231.847.215.3624.6240.0329.7323.403.662.742.724.046.534.01
Pr150.8960.81541.6930.994.256.1316.9043.3734.2624.392.832.872.413.842.765.36
SEM0.011.370.573.461.130.560.290.53
Significance product******ns******ns***ns
Significance dietnsnsnsnsnsnsns*
Significance product x diet*ns**nsnsnsns***
ns—not significant, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). L—dry-cured loin; C—dry-cured “cachaço”). Haem pigments in mg myoglobin/g fresh muscle. Cf15—Base diet + 15% olive cake centrifuged; Cf25—Base diet + 25% olive cake centrifuged; Pr15—Base diet + 15% olive cake pressed; CT—Base diet.
Table 3. Effect of diet in fatty acids profile in Bísaro dry-cured Loin and dry-cured “cachaço”.
Table 3. Effect of diet in fatty acids profile in Bísaro dry-cured Loin and dry-cured “cachaço”.
Fatty AcidsLCSEMpD
ControlCf15Cf25Pr15ControlCf15Cf25Pr15
C10:00.020.020.020.020.020.010.020.010.004nsns
C12:00.050.050.050.050.040.050.040.050.003nsns
C14:01.141.151.131.111.131.131.121.110.03nsns
C14:10.030.030.030.020.020.030.030.020.005nsns
C15:00.050.050.050.070.020.030.020.010.008***ns
C16:026.1225.9826.0525.4826.3826.1726.3725.800.30nsns
C16:1n-72.502.322.292.362.532.342.322.150.08ns**
C17:00.170.200.210.120.240.230.240.220.02**ns
C17:1n-70.230.220.220.190.240.230.230.200.02nsns
C18:013.113.4113.3012.9612.6812.7212.9312.840.32*ns
9t-C18:10.210.230.190.210.200.220.180.220.01ns**
C18:1n-947.8247.4047.4948.4347.9748.0147.4348.490.55nsns
C18:2n-66.506.796.766.746.626.817.026.900.26nsns
C20:00.210.190.210.220.170.170.180.180.01***ns
C18:3n-60.0110.0110.0130.0060.0030.0060.0040.0030.002***ns
C20:1n-90.770.800.910.820.760.800.860.790.03ns***
C18:3n-30.200.240.240.220.210.240.240.250.01ns***
C20:2n-60.240.240.20.250.230.240.280.240.01ns**
C22:00.040.050.030.050.030.040.030.030.03*ns
C20:3n-60.050.050.050.060.040.050.050.040.006nsns
C22:1n-90.030.040.030.040.030.030.040.020.004nsns
C23:00.350.400.330.430.270.320.220.290.05***ns
C24:1n-90.060.070.060.070.070.070.070.060.007nsns
C22:6n-30.030.030.020.030.020.020.030.020.005nsns
SFA41.3141.5241.3840.5241.0140.8841.1640.550.56nsns
MUFA51.6551.1151.2352.1551.8351.7351.1551.950.56nsns
PUFA7.047.387.397.337.167.407.707.490.28nsns
n-66.807.107.117.066.907.117.367.180.27nsns
n-30.220.270.280.260.260.280.330.310.02***
n-6/n-331.7527.3927.3728.2430.8526.7424.8324.641.88ns**
IA0.520.520.520.500.530.520.530.510.01nsns
IT1.351.361.351.301.331.321.341.30.03nsns
h/H2.002.012.012.092.002.022.002.070.04nsns
ns—not significant, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. SEM (Standard Error of the Mean). Cf15—Base diet + 15% olive cake centrifuged; Cf25—Base diet + 25% olive cake centrifuged; Pr15—Base diet + 15% olive cake pressed; CT—Base diet. SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; PUFA n-6/n-3 (∑ omega-6)/(∑ omega-3); IA, index of atherogenicity; IT, index of thrombogenicity; h/H = (C18:1n-9 + C18:2n-6 + C20:4n-6 + C18:3n-3 + C20; 5-n3 + C22:5n-3 + C22:6n-3)/C14:0 + C16:0; only fatty acids which represented more than 0.1% are presented in the table, although all detected fatty acids were used for calculating the totals and the indices.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leite, A.; Vasconcelos, L.; Lopez, S.; Outor-Monteiro, D.; Pinheiro, V.; Rodrigues, S.; Teixeira, A. Incorporating Olive By-Products in Bísaro Pig Diets: Effect on Dry-Cured Product Quality. Foods 2024, 13, 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162579

AMA Style

Leite A, Vasconcelos L, Lopez S, Outor-Monteiro D, Pinheiro V, Rodrigues S, Teixeira A. Incorporating Olive By-Products in Bísaro Pig Diets: Effect on Dry-Cured Product Quality. Foods. 2024; 13(16):2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leite, Ana, Lia Vasconcelos, Sergio Lopez, Divanildo Outor-Monteiro, Victor Pinheiro, Sandra Rodrigues, and Alfredo Teixeira. 2024. "Incorporating Olive By-Products in Bísaro Pig Diets: Effect on Dry-Cured Product Quality" Foods 13, no. 16: 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162579

APA Style

Leite, A., Vasconcelos, L., Lopez, S., Outor-Monteiro, D., Pinheiro, V., Rodrigues, S., & Teixeira, A. (2024). Incorporating Olive By-Products in Bísaro Pig Diets: Effect on Dry-Cured Product Quality. Foods, 13(16), 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop