Next Article in Journal
Macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia) Oil Prevents High-Fat Diet-Induced Lipid Accumulation and Oxidative Stress by Activating the AMPK/Nrf2 Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Fat Content on the Shelf-Life of Vacuum-Packed Red Meat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Fava Bean (Vicia faba) Processing on Quality Characteristics and Digestibility of a Protein-Rich Snack
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quality Change of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Pericarps of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) During Storage and Its Sex-Based In Vitro Digestive Performance

1
Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel
2
Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, GTIIT, 241 Daxue Road, Shantou 515063, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials and Technologies for Energy Conversion, Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou 515063, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(22), 3671; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223671
Submission received: 4 September 2024 / Revised: 8 November 2024 / Accepted: 9 November 2024 / Published: 18 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studying Food Digestion towards Healthier Future Food Choices)

Abstract

:
Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP), particularly including the pericarp of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ (GCP), has been widely used as a food, a dietary supplement, and traditional Chinese medicine. Despite the widespread use of traditional foods, there is limited evidence regarding the precise relationships between storage conditions, aging duration, and the digestive performance of CRP. In this study, the aim was to investigate the impact of the storage conditions on the quality of aged GCP during shelf life and to evaluate the subsequent digestive performance of corresponding GCP decoctions. Respiration in GCP was monitored by measuring oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4) gases throughout the storage simulation, with O2 and CO2 validated as prospective safety measures. Five flavonoids (hesperidin, didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone) were determined as quality indicators, and their contents were significantly affected by the duration of the storage simulation and the aging periods of GCP. Our study also found that temperature and humidity significantly affected the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission from GCP. Eighteen compounds were proposed to show potential as descriptive measures of aging periods while eight compounds were proposed as potential indicators to discriminate among the spoilage level. Furthermore, the bioaccessibility of hesperidin ranged from ~30% to ~50% and was not significantly affected by the GCP’s aging time nor the consumer’s sex (p < 0.05). This study presents evidence for the future control of the quality of GCP and its digestive performance in males and females.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Traditional foods have been consumed over extended periods, but the scientific knowledge about their quality and health impacts might remain limited. Currently, the intersection of traditional foods and human health gains great interest and requires systematic elucidation of their chemical composition and digestive fate. This study focused on Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP), the sun-dried pericarp derived from Citrus reticulata Blanco and its cultivars [1]. CRP is consumed as a food, a condiment, and a popular dietary supplement, and is officially listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and the United States Pharmacopeia [1,2,3,4]. In fact, CRP is widely used as a drug in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with indications to treat nausea, vomiting, indigestion, anepithymia, diarrhea, cough, and expectoration [1]. Among various cultivars of CRP, the pericarp of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ (GCP, “Guang Chenpi” in Chinese) is considered to have the highest quality [1,3]. Overall, CRP contains numerous chemical moieties, like alkaloids, flavonoids, and essential oils, among which flavonoids are the primary bioactive constituents [1]. Traditionally, CRP products are aged from one to more than ten years, and TCM practices hold that aging increases the quality of CRP which is scientifically linked to changes in the content of flavonoids and volatile oils [1].
However, long-term storage and aging of CRP may be prone to mold growth or commercial falsification to ramp product costs [1,5]. It was found that storage at high temperature and high relative humidity (RH) for more than 7 days led to the growth of both mold and bacteria on CRP [6], addressing the importance of the optimal condition for storage. Moreover, developing a simple, rapid, and accurate method to classify and characterize CRP products with different aging periods is necessary. To this end, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) could be robust indicators for quality and safety assessments [7]. In fact, VOCs emitted from GCP and other varieties of CRP have been well studied [1,3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13], but there is scant information on VOCs’ emission during the shelf life. Moreover, there exists limited evidence of the precise links between the aging period and chemical compositions of CRP, the content of bioactive moieties, their bioaccessibility and their impact on consumer health. Such gaps could be bridged by using in vitro digestion models to evaluate the digestibility of food and oral formulations or to tackle inter-human variability of differences in digestion between males and females [14,15,16]. Such methods have been successfully applied to study the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds in citrus peels [17,18,19]. Specifically, flavonoids in citrus peel extracts were sensitive to pH conditions during in vitro gastrointestinal (GI) digestion and showed poor stability and bioavailability [17]. Altogether, there is a growing body of evidence of the differential digestion of foods and oral formulations. However, we could not locate a study on storage conditions, aging time, and the differential digestive performances of CRP in healthy males and females in the scientific literature.
This study aimed to investigate the shelf life of differently aged GCP products and the subsequent digestive fate of the corresponding decoctions. Respiratory emissions (carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and methane (CH4)) were monitored as safety indicators, while key flavonoids (hesperidin, didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone (HMF)) were monitored as quality indicators. Specifically, VOCs were explored by proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometer (PTR-TOF-MS) as a fingerprinting technique to characterize different GCP products during their aging processes, providing a new, rapid, non-invasive, and efficient quality control method. In turn, we hypothesized that differences in GCP’s fingerprints are closely correlated to its digestive fate and hesperidin release in the guts of both males and females.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

According to the standard outlined in the Product of Geographical Indication—Xinhui Chenpi (DB4407/T 70-2021), GCP products from the Xinhui district must be aged locally for at least three years. Previous studies have shown that the content of bioactive compounds increased in early storage stages, then decreased and stabilized [20], thus, this study focuses on the primary period following three years of aging. GCP aged since 2015, 2016, and 2018 (abbreviated as samples Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018) were purchased from Jiangmen Ligong International Food Co., Ltd. (Jiangmen, China). Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ was grown and harvested in the Tianma area (Xinhui District, Guangdong Province, China). Once received, GCP pieces were kept in sealed jars and the powders were prepared by pulverization using a small-sized mill (AQ-180E, Nail, Ningbo, China) right before the experiments. These powders were used to prepare GCP decoctions made from samples Y2015 and Y2018 (abbreviated as Y2015-D and Y2018-D). For this, 4 g of fine powders (passing a 60-mesh sieve) were mixed (1:15 w/v) with 60 mL deionized water for 30 min (90 °C, stirring at 600 rpm). The suspension was filtered through a 100-mesh sieve and the filtrate was cooled down on ice for 10 min before being used in the experiments.
Methanol, acetonitrile, and formic acid, all in HPLC analytical grade, were obtained from various providers (ThermoFisher, Shanghai, China; Macklin, Shanghai, China; Bio-Lab Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel; Fisher Scientific, Leicestershire, UK). Reference standards (purity ≥98%) of didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone (HMF) were purchased from Chengdu RefMedic Biotech Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Reference standards of hesperidin (at least ≥97%) were obtained from two providers (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA or Chengdu RefMedic Biotech Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China). For HPLC analyses, deionized water was prepared by using a Milli-Q® IQ-7000 (Merck, Lyon, France) water purification system or purchased from Bio-Lab Ltd. (Jerusalem, Israel). Pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa (P7000, ≥250 units per mg solid), pancreatin from porcine pancreas (P7545), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) solution, taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate (≥95%), magnesium chloride hexahydrate, ammonium carbonate, potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, and pepstatin-A were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Rehovot, Israel). Glycodeoxycholate acid sodium salt (≥97%, Holland Moran, Israel) and calcium chloride dehydrate (Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corporation, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) were obtained. Simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated duodenal fluid (SDF) were made in distilled water from stock solutions based on bio-relevant information (Table 1).

2.2. Proximate Analysis of GCP

The workflow diagram of experimental design is presented in Figure 1. GCP samples were subjected to moisture, ash, volatile solids (VS), lipid, total sugar, crude protein, and multiple elements determinations. Samples were oven-dried (105 °C) and then incinerated (600 °C, 6 h, Muffle Furnace, STM-12-12, Henan Sante Furnace Technology Co., Ltd., Luoyang, China) to determine moisture, ash, and VS contents following standard method No. 2540 [21]. Lipid content was measured by the Mojonnier method [22]. The contents of crude protein, total sugar, and multiple elements including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), carbon (C), boron (B), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), selenium (Se), strontium (Sr), molybdenum (Mo), cadmium (Cd), tin (Sn), barium (Ba), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), aluminum (Al), vanadium (V), and thallium (Tl) were determined by the Kjeldahl method, phenol-sulfuric acid colorimetry method, molybdenum-antimony anti-colorimetric method, potassium dichromate oxidation-external heating method, and ICP-OES/MS method, based on the State Standard of the People’s Republic of China (NY/T 2017-2011, GB/T 15672-2009, GB 5009.5-2016, GB 5009.268-2016) by the Convinced-Test Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). All these experiments were carried out at least in duplicates.

2.3. Monitoring of GCP During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

2.3.1. Gas Production During Shelf Life

Researchers have found that the proper storage conditions for CRP to prevent mildew are a temperature below 25 °C and humidity below 85% [1]. It has been reported that after storage at high temperature and high relative humidity for more than 7 days, both mold and bacteria grew on CRP [6]. Thus, two storage scenarios were established: one at 25 °C for two months and another of accelerated spoilage at 35 °C with a similar timeframe, and humidity was closely controlled using a closed circulatory system. Samples of 4 g GCP powders passing through the 24-mesh sieve were placed into a 250 mL glass jar in which a 25 mL vial containing 20 mL of deionized water was loaded, i.e., powders did not come into direct contact with the water. Additionally, an automatic temperature and humidity recorder with an epitaxial probe (KE-COS-03, Kong Sai En) was placed in an empty jar for humidity monitoring of the entire process. Then, all jars were incubated (Jeio Tech Lab Companion incubators) at set temperatures (25 °C or 35 °C) and connected to gas collectors with a two-way valve to create the required aerobic conditions. Gas collectors for each bioreactor were connected to a MicroOxymax respirometry system (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) equipped with a Paramagnetic O2 Sensor (Serial 200135-3), a Non-Dispersive Infrared CO2 sensor with a 0–3% detection range (Serial 200135-4), a CH4 sensor with a 0–5% detection range (Serial 200135-5), and a gas sample drier (Serial 200135-2) [23,24]. Auto-sampling and auto-measurement of the accumulation and the composition of gases were operated by a system sampling pump (Serial 200135-1) every 4 h for each bioreactor. The measured RH in the bioreactor slightly fluctuated due to each auto-sampling of gases, which was 85.2~90.9% at 25 °C and 90.3~99.9% at 35 °C. All these experiments were carried out in triplicates.

2.3.2. Emission of VOCs During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

Simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) were performed for a month for samples Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018. Each GCP piece was cut into a 1 g square sample, and then placed in a 250 mL glass jar and incubated in a constant climate chamber (Memmert HPP110, Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) with the set conditions. The VOCs’ emission from the samples was detected by the proton transfer reaction-time of flight-mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS 1000, Ionicon Analytik Ges.m.b.H, Innsbruck, Austria) once a day. Conditions of the analyses were the following [23,24]: drift temperature of 80 °C, drift pressure of 2.30 mbar, drift voltage of 630 V, and ratio of electric field strength to number density (E/N) of 142 Td. H3O+ was the reagent ion, and the mass-scale was calibrated using the signal at the mass to charge ratios (m/z) of 21.022 and 59.049. The m/z of the protonated components and the intensities were recorded. The recorded time for each channel was ~120 s with one spectrum per second, and intensities at a stable level were collected (usually from 90 to 120 s) for data analysis. Experiments were carried out in triplicates.

2.3.3. Changes in Flavonoid Levels During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

Simulations of storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) were performed for a month for samples Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018. Samples of 6 g GCP powders passing through the 24-mesh sieve were placed in a 250 mL glass jar and incubated in a constant climate chamber with the above-mentioned conditions (Memmert HPP110, Memmert GmbH + Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). Every six days, 0.3 g powders were taken and mixed (1:50 w/v) with 15 mL methanol, and then the solution was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (50 W, KB-50B, Kunshan Ultrasonic Instruments Co., Ltd.) for 60 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.2-μm needle membrane filter into an auto-sampler vial for HPLC analysis by using high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent Technologies, INC 1220 Infinity, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 4 µm) with an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 SB-C18 (4.6 × 5 mm, 4 µm). The method was modified from the one developed by Zeng’s group [25]. The flow rate was 0.6 mL/min, the column temperature was 25 °C and the maximal pressure was 250 bar. The mobile phase was 0.2% formic-water (A) and acetonitrile (B), followed by a gradient elution: 0–6 min, 16–19% B; 6–8 min, 19–44% B; 8–45 min, 44% B. Sample injection volume was 2 µL. Hesperidin and didymin were measured at 283 nm; nobiletin, HMF, and tangeretin were measured at 330 nm. Experiments were carried out in triplicates. To establish the method’s reliability, the calibration curves of the compounds are displayed in Table S1.

2.4. Evaluation of In Vitro Digestive Performance of GCP

2.4.1. Sex-Based In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion of GCP Decoction

GCP is typically consumed as a decoction, hence, GCP decoctions prepared from samples Y2015 and Y2018 (abbreviated as Y2015-D and Y2018-D) were subjected to in vitro digestions. Simulated GI digestions were performed in a water-jacketed bioreactor kept at 37 °C and controlled by a dual auto titration unit (Titrando 902, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) that gradually varied the reactor’s pH to simulate gastric and intestinal pH changes. These gradients recreated conditions of healthy adult males or females pre-programmed into the control software (“TIAMO 2.0” software, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) [15,26,27]. Briefly, 40 mL GCP decoction was mixed (2:3 v/v) with 60 mL simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and CaCl2(H2O)2 (final concentration of 0.15 mM in SGF), pepsin (2000 U/mL or 1600 U/mL in SGF for males or females, respectively) in the bioreactor. The pH was rapidly adjusted using 1 M NaOH to the initial values of 4.5 or 5 for males or females, respectively. Then a computer-controlled gastric pH gradient was initialized by auto titration of 0.3 M HCl to simulate a 2-h gastric phase for males or a 3-h gastric phase for females. In turn, a 2-h intestinal phase was initiated by rapid pH elevation to 6.25 using 0.3 M NaOH, followed by mixing 50 mL gastric chyme (1:1 v/v) with 50 mL simulated duodenal fluids (SDF) and the addition of pancreatin (100 U/mL), bile salts of sodium glycodeoxycholate (5 mM), CaCl2(H2O)2 (final concentration of 0.6 mM in SDF) and taurocholic acid (5 mM for males or 10 mM for females). The pH was maintained throughout the intestinal phase at 6.25 using 0.3 M NaOH. Aliquots of 1.1 mL samples were aspirated at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min of gastric phase (abbreviated as G0, G30, G60, G120, and G180, G180 only for females), and similarly, duodenal effluents were collected at 30 and 120 min of the intestinal phase (abbreviated as D30 and D120). The samples at time point G0 did not contain digestive enzymes. Gastric and intestinal effluents were inactivated immediately with 25 µL pepstatin A and 25 µL PMSF, respectively, then stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Simulated digestion experiments were carried out in duplicates.

2.4.2. Determination of Bioaccessibility of Hesperidin in Digestive Samples

Each digestive sample was centrifuged for 15 min (stirring at 10,000 rpm, ambient temperature), and then 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed (1:5 v/v) with 2 mL methanol. The solution was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath (35 W, Elmasonic S15, Elma, Singen, Germany) for 30 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-μm needle membrane filter to an auto-sampler vial for HPLC analysis with a high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1100 Series). Chromatographic separation was performed on an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm). The content of hesperidin was measured as mentioned previously (Section 2.3.3) with some modifications. Here, the maximal pressure was 350 bar, and the gradient elution was as follows: 0–6 min, 16–19% B; 6–20 min, 19–44% B; 20–25 min, 44% B. Hesperidin was measured at 283 nm. Detailed information regarding the calibration curve is displayed in Table S1.
The indexes of recovery and bioaccessibility of hesperidin during in vitro GI digestion were calculated according to Equations (1) and (2), respectively [14,28]:
recovery index (%) = A/C × 100
bioaccessibility index (%) = B/C × 100
A is the hesperidin content quantified at each time point, B is the hesperidin content quantified in the supernatant after the complete digestion, and C is the hesperidin content quantified in the tested food before digestion (all units were mg/g dry matter). The recovery index is related to the percentage of hesperidin in the digest at each time point of the digestion. The bioaccessibility index is defined as the percentage of hesperidin that is solubilized in the chyme after the intestinal phase, thereby defining the proportion of the compounds that could be absorbed into the systematic circulation [14,28].

2.5. Experimental Design and Data Analysis

The VOCs’ emission data were processed and analysed by PTR-MS Viewer 3.4 (Ionicon Analytik Ges.m.b.H., Innsbruck, Austria). Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out using the R programming language (Version 1.4.1717—© 2009–2017 RStudio) to analyze the accumulative VOC emitted by GCP under different storage conditions over a month. The three-dimensional (3D) plots of the spectra profiles of VOCs were created using MATLAB R2021b (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The tentative structures of VOCs were drawn using ChemDraw (PerkinElmer Informatics 22.0.0). Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was obtained and the corresponding variable importance in projection (VIP) values were calculated using SIMCA 14.1 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). Heatmaps were generated using average normalized raw data with log(10) transformation to visualize the intensity of VOCs emitted at various storage timepoints. Statistical analyses for analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were conducted, and the data were plotted by GraphPad Prism 9.2.0 (San Diego, CA, USA), where the significance was denoted as the letter where p < 0.05. All reported data represent the mean ± standard deviation of at least duplicate experiments.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate Analysis of GCP

To evaluate the quality of aged GCP, contents of moisture, VS, ash, lipid, crude protein, total sugar, and multiple elements were determined for GCP samples and are shown in Table 2. The aging periods of GCP showed a significant effect on the fat content, total sugar content and the contents of the elements C, Sn, Pb, Fe, Al, and V (p < 0.05). These analyses showed all samples had marginal contents of heavy metals like Pb, Cd, and Tl. Our results are consistent with previous studies showing that CRP contains various trace elements such as K, Na, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Fe, Sr, Mn, Mo, and Se [1]. Additionally, the findings indicate that the aging process was accompanied by a significant rise of Sn and Fe levels as well as a reduction in the total sugar content (p < 0.05). This drop in sugar content concurs with previous results and is hypothesized to arise from thermal degradation processes due to the prolonged aging [29]. Therefore, the total sugar content can be used as one of the indexes of the aging period.

3.2. Monitoring of GCP During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

3.2.1. Gas Production During Shelf Life

Aging and spoilage of GCP are related to respiration, growth of microorganisms including yeast and molds, making O2, CO2, and CH4 clear indicators [30,31,32]. This work examined two real-life storage scenarios over two months and to our knowledge, this is the first study to monitor such indicators of GCP with results given in Figure 2. Both aging periods of GCP and the storage conditions significantly affected the lag phase duration (when the initial O2 consumption rates or the CO2 accumulative rates were <1 μg/min) (p < 0.05); such durations were in an ascending order among samples: Y2016 < Y2018 < Y2015 without correlation to their aging periods and were accompanied by a decrease at higher temperature and humidity in accelerated spoilage (Figure 2D,E). The lag phase might indicate the rate at which microbial community establish itself on the substrate, providing deeper insights into its nutritional richness or microbial toxicity. After the lag phase, the signal of high microbial activity for all samples appeared manifesting as the sharp rises of O2 consumption rates and CO2 accumulative rates (Figure 2D,E), along with a dramatical increase in the O2 consumptions and the CO2 accumulations (Figure 2A,B). Such a high microbial activity might be an early signal of spoilage. However, the unexpected earlier signal of spoilage (12~17 days) for samples at the storage conditions (25 °C) could be explained by the relatively high RH (85.2~90.9%) caused by the evaporation of water in the vial loaded in the jar. Similar to this study, the CO2 respiration rate or CO2 formation increased with increasing temperature for wheat [32], shredded cabbage [30], and skinless chicken breast [33].
Subsequently, the CO2 accumulative rates and the O2 consumption rates of all samples under both storage conditions displayed gradual decreasing trends until the spoilage was almost complete at about 60 days (when CO2 accumulative rates were <6 μg/min or O2 consumption rates were <5 μg/min) (Figure 2D,E); the corresponding O2 consumptions and the CO2 accumulations increased slowly until becoming relatively stable and were eventually in ascending order among the samples: Y2015 < Y2016 < Y2018 under either condition (Figure 2A,B). A significant rise in total sugar content along the longer aging time of GCP (p < 0.05) suggested that the oxidation of sugar in a respiratory reaction could contribute to the total CO2 emission (Table 2). Additionally, the degree of spoilage was related to the increase of the CO2 amount, and higher storage temperature contributed to the increase of CO2 formation [33]. Therefore, raising the temperature and the humidity increased the spoilage levels of GCP as demonstrated in the higher contents of CO2 accumulations and O2 consumptions eventually (Figure 2A,B). Distinctively, the CH4 accumulative rates of samples decreased primally and then fluctuated limitedly, eventually resulting in little negative CH4 accumulations (Figure 2C,F). Though food spoilage can be tested by detecting naturally emitted gases like CH4 as food decays [34], CH4 cannot serve as an indicator of the aerobic spoilage of GCP. Overall, the respiration of GCP might be monitored with O2 and CO2 and thus they were validated as indicators of the early signals of spoilage.

3.2.2. Emission of VOCs During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

By constantly monitoring the VOCs’ emission from samples Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018 during simulations of storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) for one month, plots of the VOCs’ emission were created (Figure S1), where four compounds (with m/z of 32, 81, 95, and 137) with the relatively highest intensities were found in all samples under both simulations. These compounds (compounds A1~A4) were proposed to serve as the characteristic VOCs of GCP and are presented in Table 3, where the chemical compositions and the tentative identifications taking into account the available volatile compounds of GCP are suggested as well [1,3,9,10,11,12,13]. Methylpyrazine (tentatively A3) could serve as a marker to discriminate between GCP and the dried peel of other C. reticulata Blanco cultivars (CP, “Chenpi” in Chinese) with higher content in GCP than CP [3]. Additionally, monoterpene (C10H16) with various isomers found in GCP (tentatively A4) were usually the main components of the volatiles of sun-dried citrus peel, and that they could be considered as the characteristic compounds of GCP and the markers to discriminate between GCP and CP [3,9]. Furthermore, a score plot of the PCA for spectra profiles was carried out to identify a volatile fingerprint of GCP and the storage conditions, which showed a relatively similar pattern for three samples but a significant difference between the two simulated conditions (Figure 3A). Thus, VOCs’ emission from GCP varied with temperature and humidity.
Additionally, the PCA plot for VOCs’ emission during the first week of simulated storage manifested the VOCs differences among the samples, where Y2015 and Y2018 exhibited unique emission patterns separately, but both had a similarity to Y2016 (Figure 3B). Then, the supervised OPLS-DA was used to further identify the VOCs variation among samples (Figure 3C). Statistical parameters (R2X = 0.981, R2Y = 0.929, Q2 = 0.799) of the OPLS-DA model showed a good fit and prediction, and the model was validated using 200 permutation tests (Figure S2). By using the one-way ANOVA test, compounds with VIP values > 1.00 and p < 0.05 (compounds B1~B18) were selected as the potential markers to discriminate among the aging periods of GCP and are listed according to the VIP values in Table 4, together with the suggested tentative identifications [1,3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, a heatmap was applied to visualize the variations in these compounds, where colors indicate the signal intensity (log10-transformed) of each metabolite (Figure 4A). The majority of compounds showed higher levels in Y2015 than in Y2016 and Y2018 with a little difference between Y2016 and Y2018 (Figure 4A), consistent with the PCA results shown in Figure 3B. Thus, the aging periods of GCP contributed to VOCs accumulation and subsequent emission, which was consistent with the findings that storage time affected the volatile oil content of CRP [1]. Aging at least one year longer than samples Y2016 and Y2018 resulted in an increasing VOCs emission in Y2015, thus a turning point is essential for the quality change in GCP during aging. Similarly, the levels of metabolites that contributed significantly to identifying the storage years of GCP showed a rising trend during 3–10 years and peaked at 5–10 years [34]. Furthermore, methyl acetate (tentatively B1) may cause aromas of ripe fruits such as tangerines, apples, and red berries in GCP [13], and ethyl acetate (tentatively B7) was used as a quality index of citrus aroma [9]. Additionally, compounds (3Z)-hex-3-en-1-ol, 2-hexanone, 2-hexen-1-ol, and hexanal (tentatively B4), compound butanone (tentatively B5), compounds 3-methylbutanal and 2,3-butanedione (tentatively B9), compound methylpyrazine (tentatively B15), compounds thymol and perilla aldehyde (tentatively B11), compounds (R)-(+)-β-citronellol and decanal (tentatively B17) could be considered as the discriminating markers of GCP and CP [3,4,9]. Specially, compounds 5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol, 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol, and thymol (tentatively B11) could be key aroma compounds of aged GCP in different years [8].
The OPLS-DA with statistical parameters (R2X = 0.908, R2Y = 0.974, Q2 = 0.961) showed a clear separation in VOCs variation between the first week and the fourth week of simulated spoilage (Figure 3D) and was validated using 200 permutation tests (Figure S3). By using the one-way ANOVA test, compounds with VIP values > 1.10 and p < 0.05 (compounds C1~C8) were selected as potential discriminates of the spoilage levels and are listed in Table 5, together with the suggested tentative identifications [1,3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, a heatmap visualizing the variations in these compounds showed that all compounds showed an upward trend in the fourth week compared to the first week of accelerated spoilage (Figure 4B), thus they may be related to the spoilage level of GCP manifesting as the higher intensity at the higher spoilage level. Overall, temperature and humidity significantly affected the VOCs emission of GCP, among which compounds B1~B18 showed the potential to descriptively measure the aging process and compounds C1~C8 showed the potential to discriminate among the spoilage levels.

3.2.3. Changes in Flavonoid Levels During Storage and Accelerated Spoilage

The flavonoids of CRP have various important pharmaceutical activities [1,10]. The contents of five key flavonoids (hesperidin, didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and HMF) during the simulated storage (25 °C, 60% RH) and the accelerated spoilage (35 °C, 90% RH) for one month are shown in Figure 5. Both the duration of storage simulation and the aging periods of GCP significantly affected the contents of five flavonoids under either simulation (p < 0.05) (Figure 5). Previous studies have similarly demonstrated that contents of flavonoids are influenced by aging duration [20]. The contents of hesperidin and didymin in all samples displayed relatively decreasing trends under either storage or accelerated spoilage, and those contents in each sample were relatively higher at the end of the simulated storage than that of accelerated spoilage, whereas the contents of the other flavonoids in each sample were similar at the end of either process (Figure 5). Thus, improper storage conditions might lower the quality of GCP by reducing the contents of hesperidin and didymin. Significant differences in the contents of nobiletin, tangeretin or HMF existed initially among the three samples and were sustained until the end of both the simulated storage and the accelerated spoilage (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C–E). Noticeably, the contents of nobiletin and tangeretin significantly increased with the aging time of GCP and those contents in sample Y2018 were significantly the lowest (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C,E). In agreement with the previous study [1], the quality of GCP was increased with the extension of the aging time. It was found that nobiletin, tangeretin, and HMF increased with the storage period of CRP [1,35,36], the insignificant correlation between the contents of hesperidin and HMF and the aging periods of the samples was likely due to the insufficient difference among the aging periods. Our findings also raised another question about the possible links between the aging periods of GCP and the digestibility in males and females as well as consumer health.

3.3. Evaluation of In Vitro Digestive Performance of GCP

Hesperidin is a major phenolic compound found in citrus peels [17], which was chosen as a model for the flavonoids in this study. The hesperidin contents in the decoction samples of Y2015-D and Y2018-D under in vitro digestive conditions of healthy males and females are shown in Figure 6A. The hesperidin content of two samples decreased significantly at 30 min of gastric phase (G30) under either digestive condition, then remained without a significant change during the gastric and the intestinal phases (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A). The corresponding recovery index (%) of hesperidin is depicted in Figure 6B, both the digestion time and the aging periods of GCP showed significant effects on the changes in hesperidin recovery, but the consumer’s sex did not (p < 0.05). The recovery of hesperidin for samples at both digestive conditions reduced to ~30% or ~40% at the gastric phase, mainly at G30, and subsequently remained without a significant difference until the end of digestion (Figure 6B). Similarly, a significant decrease of hesperidin was found in the sweet orange pulp during the gastric phase and did not differ between the gastric and intestinal phases [37], and hesperidin in the pulp of Satsuma, Ponkan, and Naval orange was significantly decreased after the in vitro digestion [38]. Additionally, a previous study investigating the in vitro digestion of the dried tangerine peel has shown that the total flavonoid content (TFC) was reduced greatly by the SGF treatment, but was not affected by the SIF treatment [19]. The bioactivity of phenolic compounds including flavonoids, is related to phenolic-protein interactions [19], thus; the efficient release of hesperidin from the matrix in the gastric or intestinal phase and the binding reaction with pepsin or pancreatin might lead to a reduction in recovery. Moreover, Sun et al. suggest that a decrease in hesperidin after simulated in vitro digestion could be partially explained by its transformation into chalcones under alkaline conditions, or by racemization creating enantiomers due to the pH changes, which made them escape HPLC detection [38].
The biochemical conditions in the intestinal phase caused the increasing trends in the content and recovery of hesperidin, except for sample Y2018-D under the digestive condition of females, although these trends were not significant (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A,B). Such trends may be caused by the transformation from other flavonoids or be related to the additional 2-h digestion and the effect of the intestinal enzymes and bile salts, which helped the release of phenolics bound to the matrix [14,38]. Moreover, the bioaccessibility of hesperidin of samples under both digestive conditions ranged between ~30% and ~50%, and the consumer’s sex and aging periods of GCP did not show a significant effect on it (Figure 6C). Overall, the differences in GCP’s fingerprints were closely associated with its digestive fate and hesperidin release in the guts of healthy males and females without a significant impact on the bioaccessibility of hesperidin. The obtained knowledge may provide a basis for the possible control of the sex-based digestive performance of GCP.

4. Conclusions

The shelf life of traditional Chinese medicine, like GCP, may vary over time and with diverse storage conditions, potentially affecting its digestive fate and overall impact on consumers. Therefore, this study explored the characteristics and shelf life of variably aged GCP as well as their breakdown during simulated digestive conditions of healthy males and females. Monitoring respiration of GCP established O2 and CO2 as early-stage indicators of spoilage that could prospectively be used as safety measures as well. This study showed that temperature and humidity significantly affected the emitted VOCs during storage, with 18 specific moieties identified as possible descriptive measures of aging and 8 specific moieties identified as potential discriminants of spoilage levels. With respect to possible bioactive moieties, hesperidin, didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and HMF were determined as quality indicators, with their contents significantly affected by the duration of the storage simulation and the aging periods of GCP. Notably, nobiletin and tangeretin levels were found to increase over aging time while hesperidin and didymin levels were compromised by improper storage conditions. Decoctions of GCP were found to be similarly digested under in vitro digestive conditions of healthy males or females. In fact, the bioaccessibility of hesperidin ranged from ~30% to ~50% and was not significantly affected by the GCP’s aging nor by the consumer’s sex (p < 0.05). Thus, this work demonstrates that GCP’s aging and spoilage can be analytically monitored with an omics approach. Interestingly, this work provides evidence that the bioactive hesperidin is likely to be equally bioaccessible in males and females. In the face of the growing interest in nutraceuticals and Chinese medicine, future experiments are needed to validate the proposed markers of quality and spoilage as well as affirm the digestive fate of GCP in different consumers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods13223671/s1, Table S1: Calibration curve data for five reference compounds hesperidin, didymin, nobiletin, tangeretin, and 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone (HMF) (n = 2); Figure S1: Three-dimensional (3D) plots of the detected spectra (m/z from 20 to 280) of the VOCs’ emission from samples (A) Y2015, (B) Y2016, and (C)Y2018 during the simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH), and from samples (D) Y2015, (E) Y2016, and (F) Y2018 during the accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) during a month. The arrows marked the peaks of the compounds with m/z of 32, 81, 95 and 137 (compounds A1~A4 shown in Table 3); Figure S2: Performed permutations test (n = 200) with statistic parameters of [R2 = (0.0, 0.53), Q2 = (0.0, −0.721)] for (A) Y2015, [R2 = (0.0, 0.528), Q2 = (0.0, −0.757)] for (B) Y2016, and [R2= (0.0, 0.523), Q2 = (0.0, −0.802)] for (C)Y2018 at the first week of simulated storage in the OPLS-DA model; Figure S3: Performed permutations test (n = 200) with statistic parameters of [R2 = (0.0, 0.232), Q2 = (0.0, −0.452)] for (A) samples at the first week and [R2 = (0.0, 0.222), Q2 = (0.0, −0.48)] for (B) samples at the fourth week of accelerated spoilage in the OPLS-DA model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Y.; software, P.Y.; formal analysis, P.Y.; investigation, P.Y., Y.Z., C.L., B.Q., Y.S. and Q.H.; data curation, P.Y.; visualization, P.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.A. and U.L.; resources, Y.A. and U.L.; supervision, Y.A. and U.L.; project administration, Y.A. and U.L.; funding acquisition, Y.A. and U.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the “Innovative Seed” Project to be funded by Shantou Listed Companies Development Promotion Association and Education Foundation of Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology. Y.A.’s lab is supported by the 2021 Guangdong Special Fund for Science and Technology (No. STKJ2021128), the Special Funds for higher education development of Guangdong Province, the “Climbing Plan” project to be funded by the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund, and the Seed Grant from the Technion and Guangdong Technion- Isreal Institute of Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Materials and Technologies for Energy Conversion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, X.; Sun, S.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, D.; Li, G.; Lü, S. Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Chenpi): Botany, Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology of a Frequently Used Traditional Chinese Medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 220, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China; China Medical Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lv, W.; Lin, T.; Ren, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Bi, F.; Gu, L.; Hou, H.; He, J. Rapid Discrimination of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ by Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry Fingerprints Combined with Principal Component Analysis. Food Res. Int. 2020, 131, 108985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duan, L.; Guo, L.; Dou, L.L.; Zhou, C.L.; Xu, F.G.; Zheng, G.D.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Discrimination of Citrus reticulata Blanco and Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ by Gas Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometry Based Metabolomics Approach. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, P.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, F.; Jiang, L.; Liu, X.; Ding, S.; Shan, Y. A Novel Method for the Nondestructive Classification of Different-Age Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Based on Data Combination Technique. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fu, M.; An, K.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zou, B.; Xiao, G.; Ti, H. Effects of Different Temperature and Humidity on Bioactive Flavonoids and Antioxidant Activity in Pericarpium Citri Reticulata (Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’). LWT 2018, 93, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, W.; Lin, H.; Jiang, H.; Yao-Say Solomon Adade, S.; Xue, Z.; Chen, Q. Advanced Applications of Chemo-Responsive Dyes Based Odor Imaging Technology for Fast Sensing Food Quality and Safety: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5145–5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, K.; Xu, K.; Wang, J.; Meng, F.; Wang, B. Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS Combined with GC-O-MS to Analyze the Changes of Aroma Compounds in the Aging Process of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium. Food Biosci. 2023, 54, 102798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, X.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Li, L. Effect of Drying Methods on Volatile Compounds of Citrus reticulata Ponkan and Chachi Peels as Characterized by GC-MS and GC-IMS. Foods 2022, 11, 2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, M.; Luo, H.; Hu, P.; Yang, Y.; Wu, B.; Zheng, G. Evaluation of Chemical Components in Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium of Different Cultivars Collected from Different Regions by GC–MS and HPLC. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 400–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Zou, S.; Yang, W.; Peng, M.; Chen, B.; Deng, J.; Wei, M.; Zheng, G. Identification of Volatile and Nonvolatile Compounds in Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Viride Using GC–MS, UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-MS, and HPLC-PDA. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 1415–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, L.; Li, X.; Liu, S.; Xu, G.; Liang, Y. Comparative Analysis of Volatile Constituents in Citrus reticulata Blanco Using GC–MS and Alternative Moving Window Factor Analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 3457–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, H.; Wen, J.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Yu, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Fu, M. Evaluation of Dynamic Changes and Formation Regularity in Volatile Flavor Compounds in Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ Peel at Different Collection Periods Using Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry. LWT 2022, 171, 114126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martínez-Las Heras, R.; Pinazo, A.; Heredia, A.; Andrés, A. Evaluation Studies of Persimmon Plant (Diospyros kaki) for Physiological Benefits and Bioaccessibility of Antioxidants by in Vitro Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lajterer, C.; Shani Levi, C.; Lesmes, U. An in Vitro Digestion Model Accounting for Sex Differences in Gastro-Intestinal Functions and Its Application to Study Differential Protein Digestibility. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 132, 107850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vinarov, Z.; Abdallah, M.; Agundez, J.A.G.; Allegaert, K.; Basit, A.W.; Braeckmans, M.; Ceulemans, J.; Corsetti, M.; Griffin, B.T.; Grimm, M.; et al. Impact of Gastrointestinal Tract Variability on Oral Drug Absorption and Pharmacokinetics: An UNGAP Review. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 162, 105812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.; Kou, G.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z. Protection and Delivery of Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) Peel Extracts by Encapsulation of Whey Protein Concentrate Nanoparticles. LWT 2019, 99, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Petry, F.C.; Mercadante, A.Z. Impact of in Vitro Digestion Phases on the Stability and Bioaccessibility of Carotenoids and Their Esters in Mandarin Pulps. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 3951–3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hou, F.; Hu, K.; Gong, Y.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M. Effects of in Vitro Simulated Digestion on the Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Activity of Aged and Fresh Dried Tangerine Peel. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhou, A.; Cao, Y.; Xiao, J.; Xiao, H.; Song, M. Review of Recent Advances on Health Benefits, Microbial Transformations, and Authenticity Identification of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Bioactive Compounds. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 64, 10332–10360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pomeranz, Y.; Meloan, C.E. Food Analysis: Theory and Practice, 3rd ed.; CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dar, S.U.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yu, P.; Qin, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zou, Y.; Poh, L.; Eichen, Y.; Achmon, Y. On the Quest for Novel Bio-Degradable Plastics for Agricultural Field Mulching. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 922974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liu, X.; Zou, Y.; Yu, P.; Zeng, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Van Horne, C.; et al. Assessment of Using Solid Residues of Fish for Treating Soil by the Biosolarization Technique as an Alternative to Soil Fumigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 357, 131886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeng, S.L.; Li, S.Z.; Lai, C.J.S.; Wei, M.Y.; Chen, B.Z.; Li, P.; Zheng, G.D.; Liu, E.H. Evaluation of Anti-Lipase Activity and Bioactive Flavonoids in the Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium from Different Harvest Time. Phytomedicine 2018, 43, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shani-Levi, C.; Levi-Tal, S.; Lesmes, U. Comparative Performance of Milk Proteins and Their Emulsions under Dynamic in Vitro Adult and Infant Gastric Digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 2013, 32, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brodkorb, A.; Egger, L.; Alminger, M.; Alvito, P.; Assunção, R.; Ballance, S.; Bohn, T.; Bourlieu-Lacanal, C.; Boutrou, R.; Carrière, F.; et al. INFOGEST Static in Vitro Simulation of Gastrointestinal Food Digestion. Nat. Protoc. 2019, 14, 991–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ortega, N.; Macià, A.; Romero, M.P.; Reguant, J.; Motilva, M.J. Matrix Composition Effect on the Digestibility of Carob Flour Phenols by an In-Vitro Digestion Model. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, M.; Tian, G.; Zhao, C.; Ahmad, A.; Zhang, H.; Bi, J.; Xiao, H.; Zheng, J. Infrared Drying as a Quick Preparation Method for Dried Tangerine Peel. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6254793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nei, D.; Uchino, T.; Sakai, N.; Tanaka, S. ichirou Prediction of Sugar Consumption in Shredded Cabbage Using a Respiratory Model. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 41, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vageesan, V.; Chakravarthi, M.K.; Kumar, V.B.; Charan, G. Anoxic Microbial Methanogenic Detection for Food Safety Sustentation. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication and Technology, (RTEICT 2021), Bengaluru, India,, 27–28 August 2021; pp. 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Raudienė, E.; Rušinskas, D.; Balčiūnas, G.; Juodeikienė, G.; Gailius, D. Carbon Dioxide Respiration Rates in Wheat at Various Temperatures and Moisture Contents. Mapan J. Metrol. Soc. India 2017, 32, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rukchon, C.; Nopwinyuwong, A.; Trevanich, S.; Jinkarn, T.; Suppakul, P. Development of a Food Spoilage Indicator for Monitoring Freshness of Skinless Chicken Breast. Talanta 2014, 130, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, A. An Arduino Sensor-Based Approach for Detecting the Food Spoilage. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2020, 5, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Luo, Y.; Zeng, W.; Huang, K.E.; Li, D.X.; Chen, W.; Yu, X.Q.; Ke, X.H. Discrimination of Citrus reticulata Blanco and Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ as Well as the Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ within Different Storage Years Using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Based Metabolomics Approach. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 171, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, M.; Jiang, Z.; Wen, M.; Wu, Z.; Zha, M.; Xu, W.; Zhang, L. Chemical Variation of Chenpi (Citrus Peels) and Corresponding Correlated Bioactive Compounds by LC-MS Metabolomics and Multibioassay Analysis. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 825381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Peña-Vázquez, G.I.; Dominguez-Fernández, M.T.; Camacho-Zamora, B.D.; Hernandez-Salazar, M.; Urías-Orona, V.; De Peña, M.P.; de la Garza, A.L. In Vitro Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion Impacts Bioaccessibility and Bioactivity of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) Phenolic Compounds. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 88, 104891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, Y.; Tao, W.; Huang, H.; Ye, X.; Sun, P. Flavonoids, Phenolic Acids, Carotenoids and Antioxidant Activity of Fresh Eating Citrus Fruits, Using the Coupled in Vitro Digestion and Human Intestinal HepG2 Cells Model. Food Chem. 2019, 279, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Workflow diagram of experimental design.
Figure 1. Workflow diagram of experimental design.
Foods 13 03671 g001
Figure 2. Respiration under simulated storage (25 °C and 85.2~90.9% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90.3~99.9% RH) for Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018 for two months. (A) O2 consumption, (B) CO2 accumulation, (C) CH4 accumulation, (D) O2 consumption rate and the insert of lag phase duration, (E) CO2 accumulative rate and the insert of lag phase duration, (F) CH4 accumulative rate. The lag phases were supposed when the initial O2 consumption rates or the CO2 accumulative rates were <1 μg/min. The p-value was obtained by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Different letters indicated a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05). Data represented the means of three replicate bioreactors.
Figure 2. Respiration under simulated storage (25 °C and 85.2~90.9% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90.3~99.9% RH) for Y2015, Y2016, and Y2018 for two months. (A) O2 consumption, (B) CO2 accumulation, (C) CH4 accumulation, (D) O2 consumption rate and the insert of lag phase duration, (E) CO2 accumulative rate and the insert of lag phase duration, (F) CH4 accumulative rate. The lag phases were supposed when the initial O2 consumption rates or the CO2 accumulative rates were <1 μg/min. The p-value was obtained by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Different letters indicated a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05). Data represented the means of three replicate bioreactors.
Foods 13 03671 g002aFoods 13 03671 g002b
Figure 3. (A) PCA plot of the accumulative VOCs emitted by Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ (GCP) under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) for a month. (B) PCA plot of the accumulative VOCs emitted by GCP under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) during the first week of a month. (C) OPLS-DA score plots for GCP under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) in the first week (1~7 day) of a month with statistical parameters (R2X = 0.981, R2Y = 0.929, Q2 = 0.799). (D) OPLS-DA score plots for GCP under accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) in the first (1~7 days) and fourth week (24~30 days) with statistical parameters (R2X = 0.908, R2Y = 0.974, Q2 = 0.961).
Figure 3. (A) PCA plot of the accumulative VOCs emitted by Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’ (GCP) under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) for a month. (B) PCA plot of the accumulative VOCs emitted by GCP under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) during the first week of a month. (C) OPLS-DA score plots for GCP under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) in the first week (1~7 day) of a month with statistical parameters (R2X = 0.981, R2Y = 0.929, Q2 = 0.799). (D) OPLS-DA score plots for GCP under accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) in the first (1~7 days) and fourth week (24~30 days) with statistical parameters (R2X = 0.908, R2Y = 0.974, Q2 = 0.961).
Foods 13 03671 g003
Figure 4. Heat-maps (log10 scales) indicating VOCs intensity from low (blue) to high (red) for different storage timepoints. (A) Heat-map for the first week (1~7 days) under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH). (B) Heat-map for the first week (1~7 days) and the fourth week (24~30 days) under accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH).
Figure 4. Heat-maps (log10 scales) indicating VOCs intensity from low (blue) to high (red) for different storage timepoints. (A) Heat-map for the first week (1~7 days) under simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH). (B) Heat-map for the first week (1~7 days) and the fourth week (24~30 days) under accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH).
Foods 13 03671 g004
Figure 5. Contents of (A) hesperidin, (B) didymin, (C) nobiletin, (D) 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone (HMF), and (E) tangeretin in samples Y2015, Y2016 and Y2018 during simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) for a month. Data represented the mean of three replicate bioreactors. The p-value was obtained by a two-way ANOVA test, different letters indicated a significant difference among three samples at each time section (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Contents of (A) hesperidin, (B) didymin, (C) nobiletin, (D) 3,5,6,7,8,3′,4′-heptamethoxyflavone (HMF), and (E) tangeretin in samples Y2015, Y2016 and Y2018 during simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH) for a month. Data represented the mean of three replicate bioreactors. The p-value was obtained by a two-way ANOVA test, different letters indicated a significant difference among three samples at each time section (p < 0.05).
Foods 13 03671 g005aFoods 13 03671 g005bFoods 13 03671 g005c
Figure 6. (A) Hesperidin contents in Y2015-D and Y2018-D during sex-based in vitro digestion, the p-value was obtained by a one-way ANOVA test for each sample, different letters indicated a significant difference among time sections within each group (p < 0.05). (B) Recovery index of hesperidin during in vitro digestion, the p-value was obtained by a three-way ANOVA test (assuming results at G180 for males equal to those at G120), different letters indicated a significant difference among samples (p < 0.05). (C) The in vitro bioaccessibility of hesperidin, the p-value was obtained by a two-way ANOVA test, different letters indicated a significant difference among samples (p < 0.05). Data represented the mean of two replicates.
Figure 6. (A) Hesperidin contents in Y2015-D and Y2018-D during sex-based in vitro digestion, the p-value was obtained by a one-way ANOVA test for each sample, different letters indicated a significant difference among time sections within each group (p < 0.05). (B) Recovery index of hesperidin during in vitro digestion, the p-value was obtained by a three-way ANOVA test (assuming results at G180 for males equal to those at G120), different letters indicated a significant difference among samples (p < 0.05). (C) The in vitro bioaccessibility of hesperidin, the p-value was obtained by a two-way ANOVA test, different letters indicated a significant difference among samples (p < 0.05). Data represented the mean of two replicates.
Foods 13 03671 g006
Table 1. Composition of SGF and SDF for the preparation of 1L solution.
Table 1. Composition of SGF and SDF for the preparation of 1L solution.
ParameterStock (g/L)SGF (mL)SDF (mL)
KCl46.721110.8
KH2PO4681.81.6
NaCl12035.260.1
MgCl2(H2O)6300.82.2
(NH4)2CO3481-
DW-To be completed up to 1L after pH correction
pH-37
Table 2. Proximate analysis of samples Y2015, Y2016 and Y2018.
Table 2. Proximate analysis of samples Y2015, Y2016 and Y2018.
ParameterY2015Y2016Y2018
Moisture content (g water/g DS)0.16 ± 0.01 a0.11 ± 0.01 a0.13 ± 0.01 a
Volatile solids content (%DS)96.17 ± 0.45 a96.42 ± 0.64 a96.89 ± 0.90 a
Ash content (g/g DS)0.038 ± 0.004 a0.036 ± 0.006 a0.031 ± 0.009 a
Lipid content (g/100 g) 3.75 ± 0.77 a3.71 ± 0.38 a2.64 ± 0.53 b
Crude protein content (g/100 g)9.91 ± 0.13 a8.62 ± 0.02 a9.33 ± 0.16 a
Total sugar content (mg/gDW)420.66 ± 37.21 b449.88 ± 14.95 a451.39 ± 6.39 a
P content (g/kg)1.10 ± 0.02 a1.06 ± 0.10 a0.86 ± 0.16 a
C content (g/kg)347.09 ± 13.92 b341.36 ± 12.92 b441.27 ± 6.44 a
N content (g/kg)16.95 ± 0.52 a15.77 ± 0.18 a15.35 ± 0.14 a
B content (mg/kg)28.94 ± 2.48 a25.46 ± 1.94 a20.58 ± 2.91 a
Cr content (mg/kg)5.33 ± 0.18 a5.78 ± 0.27 a5.28 ± 0.05 a
Co content (mg/kg)0.08 ± 0.003 a0.10 ± 0.002 a0.09 ± 0.0007 a
Ni content (mg/kg)1.43 ± 0.02 a1.73 ± 0.02 a1.64 ± 0.05 a
Cu content (mg/kg)6.33 ± 0.31 a5.85 ± 0.39 a6.19 a
Mn content (mg/kg)12.65 ± 0.36 a14.04 ± 2.64 a15.54 ± 0.27 a
As content (mg/kg)0.071 ± 0.005 a0.067 ± 0.003 a0.065 ± 0.005 a
Se content (mg/kg)1.56 ± 0.14 a1.92 ± 0.17 a1.69 ± 0.05 a
Sr content (mg/kg)26.31 ± 0.25 a28.01 ± 1.85 a22.99 ± 0.53 a
Mo content (mg/kg)0.11 ± 0.002 a0.12 ± 0.00008 a0.11 ± 0.006 a
Cd content (μg/kg)6.46 ± 0.61 a15.81 ± 2.12 a15.54 ± 0.89 a
Sn content (μg/kg)67.16 ± 1.46 a61.17 ± 7.21 ab51.75 ± 5.29 b
Ba content (mg/kg)22.67 ± 0.11 a16.32 ± 0.30 a16.11 ± 0.08 a
Zn content (mg/kg)10.97 ± 0.17 a10.39 ± 0.53 a7.68 ± 0.04 a
Pb content (μg/kg)253.35 ± 18.23 b322.72 ± 11.45 a332.65 ± 2.70 a
K content (g/kg)10.19 ± 0.03 a11.27 ± 0.74 a6.37 ± 0.01 a
Mg content (g/kg)0.57 ± 0.01 a0.56 ± 0.02 a0.56 ± 0.01 a
Fe content (mg/kg)112.99 ± 1.95 a104.98 ± 13.98 a74.64 ± 0.05 b
Na content (g/kg)0.016 ± 0.003 a0.031 ± 0.01 a0.021 ± 0.01 a
Ca content (g/kg)3.97 ± 0.17 a3.10 ± 0.14 a3.30 ± 0.11 a
Al content (mg/kg)72.69 ± 0.88 b70.07 ± 1.76 b116.28 ± 6.77 a
V content (μg/kg)128.69 ± 1.88 a130.37 ± 1.25 a73.11 ± 1.19 b
Tl content (μg/kg)4.83 ± 0.05 a8.05 ± 1.91 a8.79 ± 1.61 a
Data represented the mean of at least two replicates. The p value was obtained by the two-way ANOVA test, different letters indicated a significant difference among samples for each testing parameter (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Characteristic VOCs emitted from GCP (with the relatively highest intensities) and detected during simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH).
Table 3. Characteristic VOCs emitted from GCP (with the relatively highest intensities) and detected during simulated storage (25 °C and 60% RH) and accelerated spoilage (35 °C and 90% RH).
No.m/zProtonated Chemical
Formula a
Tentative Identification bTentative Structure cRefs.
A132(CH5N)H+ fragment; O2+ fragmentNot identified; Not identifiedFoods 13 03671 i001-
A281(C6H8)H+ fragment1,4-Cyclohexadiene fragment */Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene fragment *Foods 13 03671 i002[12]
A395(C5H6N2)H+MethylpyrazineFoods 13 03671 i003[3]
A4137(C10H16)H+; (C8H8O2)H+D-Limonene/α-Pinene/β-Pinene/Limonene/Myrcene/α-Phellandrene/β-Phellandrene/α-Terpinene/γ-Terpinene/Sabinene/Terpinolene/Camphene/13,7-dimethyl-3,6-Octatriene/Ocimene/1-Methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene) cyclohexene/α-Thujene/3-Carene/4-Carene/trans-1,2-Bis(1-methylethenyl)-cyclobutene/4-Methyl-1-(1-methylethyl) bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane didehydro deriv; Benzoic acid methyl esterFoods 13 03671 i004[1,3,9,10,11,13]
a Chemical formulas were predicted using the PTR-MS Viewer 3.4 software based on a library of recognized materials, that concurs with the literature as well. b Tentative compounds were suggested according to the chemical formula. Symbol “/” indicated the possible existence of more tentative identifications corresponding to one chemical formula. c One chemical structure was suggested according to the chemical formula. * The fragment was proposed as a partial chemical compound of the detected volatile component.
Table 4. Potential VOCs markers that can discriminate between its aging periods (VIP values ≥ 1 and p < 0.05) of GCP.
Table 4. Potential VOCs markers that can discriminate between its aging periods (VIP values ≥ 1 and p < 0.05) of GCP.
No.m/zVIPProtonated Chemical
Formula a
Tentative Identification bTentative Structure cRefs.
B1752.29(C3H6O2)H+; (C4H10O)H+Hydroxyacetone/Propionic acid/Methyl acetate; 2-Methylpropanol/2-Butanol/n-ButanolFoods 13 03671 i005[3,9,13]
B2472.18(C2H6O)H+EthanolFoods 13 03671 i006[13]
B3612.15(C3H8O)H+1-PropanolFoods 13 03671 i007[9]
B41011.69(C6H12O)H+; (C5H8O2)H+(3Z)-Hex-3-en-1-ol/Hexanal/2-Hexanone/2-Hexenol/2-Hexen-1-ol; 2,3-PentadioneFoods 13 03671 i008[3,9,13]
B5731.54(C4H8O)H+Butanone/Butanal/TetrahydrofuranFoods 13 03671 i009[3,9,13]
B61791.33(C14H10)H+Phenanthrene/AnthraceneFoods 13 03671 i010[10]
B7891.30(C4H8O2)H+; (C5H12O)H+Ethyl acetate/3-Hydroxy-2-butanone/Butanoic acid/1,4-Dioxane; 2-Methyl-1-butanol/3-Methyl-1-butanolFoods 13 03671 i011[9,13]
B81801.25(C10H13NO2)H+Benzoic acid, 2-(methylamino)-, ethyl esterFoods 13 03671 i012[11]
B9871.23(C5H10O)H+; (C4H6O2)H+2-Methylbutanal/Pentanal/3-Methylbutanal/1-Penten-3-ol/3-Pentanone/2-Pentanone; 2,3-ButanedioneFoods 13 03671 i013[9,13]
B102231.20(C15H26O)H+Patchouli alcohol/Elemol/α-Cadinol/Nerolidol/(−)-Globulol/α-Eudesmol/T-muurolol/Cyclohexanemethanol, 4-ethenyl-a,a,4-tri-methyl-3-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1a,3a,4a)]-Foods 13 03671 i014[1,10,11,12]
B111511.14(C9H10O2)H+; (C10H14O)H+p-Vinylguaiacol/2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol; p-Cymen-7-ol/2-Methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-phenol/5-Methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-phenol/Carvacrol/Perilla aldehyde/Carvone/Thymol/4-(1-Methylethenyl)-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde/3-Methyl-4-isopropylphenol/2-(4-Methylphenyl)propan-2-ol/Perillene/D-carvone/Piperitenone/5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol/1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde, 4-(1-methyl-ethenyl)-Foods 13 03671 i015[1,4,8,9,10,11,12]
B12851.07(C5H8O)H+(E)-2-Pentenal/3-Methyl-2-butenal/1-Penten-3-one/3-Methyl butynolFoods 13 03671 i016[8,9,13]
B131521.04(C8H9NO2)H+Methyl 2-aminobenzoateFoods 13 03671 i017[10]
B14971.03(C5H4O2)H+Furfural/2-Furan-methyl aldehydeFoods 13 03671 i018[1,8,9,12,13]
B15951.03(C5H6N2)H+MethylpyrazineFoods 13 03671 i019[3]
B161141.03(C7H14O)+HeptanalFoods 13 03671 i020[9,13]
B171571.02(C10H20O)H+Decanal/(R)-(+)-β-Citronellol/1-Menthol/CitronellolFoods 13 03671 i021[1,3,4,8,9,10,13]
B181611.02(C12H16)H+ fragmentNot identifiedFoods 13 03671 i022-
a Chemical formulas were predicted using the PTR-MS Viewer 3.4 software based on a library of recognized materials, that concurs with the literature as well. b Symbol “/” indicated the possible existence of more tentative identifications corresponding to one chemical formula. c One chemical structure was suggested according to the chemical formula.
Table 5. Potential VOCs markers that can discriminate between spoilage levels (VIP values ≥ 1.1 and p < 0.05) of GCP.
Table 5. Potential VOCs markers that can discriminate between spoilage levels (VIP values ≥ 1.1 and p < 0.05) of GCP.
No.m/zVIPProtonated Chemical
Formula a
Tentative Identification bTentative Structure cRefs.
C11431.19(C9H18O)H+NonanalFoods 13 03671 i023[1,3,8,9,10,12]
C21651.15(C10H12O2)H+; (C11H16O)H+Phenylacetic acid ethyl ester/Eugenol/Ethyl phenylacetate/Benzene,4-ethenyl-1,2-dimethoxy-; 2-Isopropyl-5-methylanisole/2-Isopropyl-4-methylanisoleFoods 13 03671 i024[8,9,10,11,13]
C3871.23(C5H10O)H+; (C4H6O2)H+2-Methylbutanal/Pentanal/3-Methylbutanal/1-Penten-3-ol/3-Pentanone/2-Pentanone; 2,3-ButanedioneFoods 13 03671 i025[9,13]
C41071.12(C7H6O)H+BenzaldehydeFoods 13 03671 i026[8,9]
C5711.11(C4H6O)H+2-Methyl-2-propenalFoods 13 03671 i027[13]
C61491.11(C10H12O)H+CuminaldehydeFoods 13 03671 i028[8]
C7591.11(C3H6O)H+2-PropanoneFoods 13 03671 i029[9,13]
C82051.10(C15H24)H+α-Cubebene/Copaene/Ylangene/β-Cubebene/β-Caryophyllene/Caryophyllene/Humulene/Germacrene D/α-Farnesene/(+)-δ-Cadinene/1,2,3,4,6,8a-Hexahydro-1-isopropyl-4,7-dimethylnaphthalene/α-Caryophyllene/(+)-Aromadendrene/Elemene/Bicyclosesquiphellandrene/α-Gurjunene/Valencene/Aristolene/Longifolene/δ-Elemene/β-Elemene/Eremophilene/α-Serinene/β-Cadinene/γ-Elemene/β-Guaiene/2,4-Diisopropenyl-/Gemacrene B/4,7-Dimethyl-1-isopropyl naphthaleneFoods 13 03671 i030[1,4,8,10,11,13]
a Chemical formulas were predicted using the PTR-MS Viewer 3.4 software based on a library of recognized materials, that concurs with the literature as well. b Symbol “/” indicated the possible existence of more tentative identifications corresponding to one chemical formula. c One chemical structure was suggested according to the chemical formula.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, P.; Zeng, Y.; Li, C.; Qiu, B.; Shi, Y.; He, Q.; Lesmes, U.; Achmon, Y. Quality Change of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Pericarps of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) During Storage and Its Sex-Based In Vitro Digestive Performance. Foods 2024, 13, 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223671

AMA Style

Yu P, Zeng Y, Li C, Qiu B, Shi Y, He Q, Lesmes U, Achmon Y. Quality Change of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Pericarps of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) During Storage and Its Sex-Based In Vitro Digestive Performance. Foods. 2024; 13(22):3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Peirong, Yuying Zeng, Chunyu Li, Bixia Qiu, Yuan Shi, Qixi He, Uri Lesmes, and Yigal Achmon. 2024. "Quality Change of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Pericarps of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) During Storage and Its Sex-Based In Vitro Digestive Performance" Foods 13, no. 22: 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223671

APA Style

Yu, P., Zeng, Y., Li, C., Qiu, B., Shi, Y., He, Q., Lesmes, U., & Achmon, Y. (2024). Quality Change of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (Pericarps of Citrus reticulata ‘Chachi’) During Storage and Its Sex-Based In Vitro Digestive Performance. Foods, 13(22), 3671. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop