Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Lipid Compounds and Nutritional Potential of Glyceride Oils from Flower Buds and Fruits of Lagerstroemia indica L. Cultivar ‘Hopi’ Grown in Bulgaria
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of Antioxidant Capacity, Nutritional Composition, Probiotic Viability After Digestion and Sensory Attributes of Plant-Based Beverages Through Lactic Acid Fermentation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Protein–Starch Interaction on the Structure and Properties of Starch, and Its Application in Flour Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Thermal Stabilization Strategies for Rice Bran: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances, and Implications for Industrial Applications

1
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(9), 1448; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091448
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 14 April 2025 / Accepted: 18 April 2025 / Published: 22 April 2025

Abstract

:
Rice bran, a major byproduct of rice processing, is rich in unsaturated fatty acids, high-quality proteins, and bioactive compounds such as γ-oryzanol and ferulic acid. However, its poor storage stability and susceptibility to hydrolytic and oxidative rancidity critically limit industrial exploitation. Recent advances in non-thermal stabilization technologies—valued for their energy efficiency, scalability, and nutrient preservation—offer promising solutions. This review systematically elucidates the enzymatic and microbial mechanisms driving bran rancidity, emphasizing lipase and lipoxygenase activity, and critically evaluates the efficacy of emerging non-thermal strategies. Key findings highlight the superiority of non-thermal methods: cold plasma reduces lipase activity by 70% within 5 min via reactive oxygen species-induced structural disruption; ultra-high pressure preserves 95% of γ-oryzanol by selectively breaking hydrogen bonds in enzymes; high-energy electron beam irradiation suppresses rancidity markers by 45–78%; and enzymatic stabilization with immobilized papain achieves 78% lipase inactivation while retaining <5% nutrient loss. Compared to thermal approaches, non-thermal technologies enhance bioactive retention, while extending shelf-life by 2–3 weeks. By addressing challenges such as microbial synergy, parameter optimization, and industrial scalability, this review provides actionable insights for deploying green, energy-efficient strategies to valorize rice bran into functional foods and nutraceuticals, aligning with global demands for sustainable ingredient innovation.

1. Introduction

Rice bran, accounting for 5–8% of the total mass of rice, is a key byproduct of rice milling. It is not only an important source of macronutrients, e.g., 11–17% protein, 15–20% lipids, and 20–51% dietary fiber, but also contains bioactive substances like γ-oryzanol and tocotrienol, offering substantial nutritional and economic value [1,2]. Fresh rice bran is highly susceptible to hydrolytic and oxidative rancidity, with a shelf life typically limited to only around 5 days, which severely restricts its industrial exploitation [3,4]. Additionally, lipid peroxidation byproducts accelerate protein carbonylation in rice bran, reducing digestibility and diminishing essential amino acid availability [5,6]. Furthermore, lipoxygenase (LOX)-mediated oxidation degrades heat-sensitive micronutrients, retaining <40% of carotenoids and incurring >60% vitamin E loss in untreated bran [7].
When subjected to proper stabilization treatments, rice bran becomes a valuable source of protein, essential unsaturated fatty acids, tocopherols, ferulic acid derivatives, and dietary fiber [8]. Stabilized rice bran can be used to produce instant rice bran powder, and gluten-free bread. Rice bran fiber can be incorporated into products such as cakes [9], noodles [10], and biscuits [11] to increase dietary fiber content [12]. Due to its low allergenicity, rice bran protein is also suitable for use in nutritional powders, beverages, and infant foods [13]. While traditional thermal stabilization methods, such as dry heat and microwave treatment, can suppress enzymatic activity, the high temperatures involved lead to protein denaturation and vitamin degradation, limiting their applicability [14,15,16].
In contrast, non-thermal stabilization techniques, which inactivate enzyme activity at room or low temperatures through physical or chemical means, offer a promising approach to overcoming the challenges of high-value utilization [17,18]. For instance, cold plasma can reduce lipase activity by 70% within five min by disrupting its three-dimensional structure using reactive oxygen species (ROS) [19]. Ultra-high pressure (200 MPa) destroys the hydrogen bonds of enzyme molecules while preserving thermosensitive compounds like γ-oryzanol [20]. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms of rice bran rancidity, assesses the principles, applications, and effectiveness of non-thermal technologies, and aims to provide scientific evidence for the development of green and efficient rice bran stabilization methodologies.

Review Methodology

This review synthesizes literature from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science using keywords such as rice bran stabilization, non-thermal technologies, and enzyme inactivation. Inclusion criteria prioritized peer-reviewed studies focusing on mechanistic insights, scalability, and industrial applicability. Data extraction categorized methods by efficacy, nutritional retention, and technological readiness. The inclusion criteria were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English from 2010 to the present, capturing the most relevant and recent advancements.

2. Structure, Nutritional Composition, and Utilization of Rice Bran

2.1. Morphological Structure of Rice Bran

The rice grain (Oryza sativa L.) is a caryopsis composed of distinct morphological layers (Figure 1). Morphologically, it consists of three principal regions: the protective outer layers, the starchy endosperm, and the embryo [21]. Externally, it is encased within an inedible husk, comprising the lemma and palea, which protect the grain during development. Upon husk removal, the edible portion consists of the fruit coat (pericarp), seed coat (testa), and nucellar tissue, collectively termed the bran. These layers are rich in lipids, proteins, bioactive phytochemicals, and hydrolytic enzymes [22]. Beneath the bran lies the starchy endosperm, constituting ~90% of the grain’s weight, which serves as the primary energy reserve. The endosperm is subdivided into the subaleurone region, containing dense protein bodies, and the central starchy endosperm, packed with compound starch granules embedded in a protein matrix. The embryo, located at the ventral base, contains embryonic axis tissues (plumule and radicle) and the scutellum, a specialized organ that interfaces with the endosperm. Grain morphology varies by cultivar, influencing size (long, medium, or short-grain), shape, and bran pigmentation (e.g., red or purple rice) [23].

2.2. Nutritional Composition of Rice Bran

Table 1 summarizes the content ranges for the major nutritional components in rice bran. Macronutrient analysis shows 18–23 g protein per 100 g, with dietary fiber contributing 22–32 g. Importantly, digestible protein offers a high-quality energy source, while the insoluble fiber enhances gut health by modulating microbial diversity [25]. Lipid profiling identifies linoleic acid, oleic acid, and palmitic acid as predominant fatty acids [26]. Notably, linoleic acid, an essential fatty acid, plays a critical role in regulating cholesterol metabolism, inhibiting platelet aggregation, and supporting tissue repair [27,28]. In terms of micronutrients, rice bran contains notable amounts of α-tocopherol, vitamin B2, and niacin. Comparative studies have shown that brown rice contains 2–2.5 times more vitamin B1, B2, and niacin than white rice, due to the complete retention of the rice bran layer [29,30].

2.3. Advanced Utilization Strategies of Rice Bran

As global interest in the resource utilization of cereal byproducts grows, the processing technologies for rice bran and the development of its high-value products have become key research focuses [32,33]. As an important byproduct of cereal processing, diverse applications of rice bran have extended beyond traditional feed uses, showing great promise in the food [1], pharmaceutical [34], and chemical industries [35].

2.3.1. Lipid/Protein Utilization and Nutritional Advantages

In lipid applications, rice bran oil exhibits superior nutritional profiles attributed to its distinctive fatty acid composition. Refined rice bran oil typically contains 45–55% oleic acid and 30–40% linoleic acid, achieving an n-6/n-3 ratio approximating the World Health Organization-recommended 1:1 ideal balance [1]. Clinical studies have shown that this oil boasts exceptional digestibility (>96%) and offers benefits such as regulating blood lipid metabolism, improving intestinal microflora, and aiding in blood pressure reduction, making it an ideal alternative to traditional vegetable oils [36]. The protein fraction of rice bran reveals remarkable amino acid characteristics, with essential amino acids constituting 36.2% of total amino acids [37,38]. Notably, its lysine content reaches 5.1 g/100 g protein, surpassing most cereal proteins [39]. Compared to soybean protein (containing 0.1–1.5% trypsin inhibitors) and peanut protein (0.3–0.6% lectins), rice bran protein contains minimal anti-nutritional factors and low allergenicity [39]. These properties have enabled its successful incorporation into specialized nutritional products, particularly infant formulas and geriatric dietary supplements [40].

2.3.2. Phenolic Compounds and Bioactive Properties

Rice bran is rich in phenolic acids, including ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, protocatechuic acid, and vanillic acid, with ferulic acid being the most abundant [41]. Ferulic acid exists in both cis and trans isomers and is primarily present in rice bran in a bound form, typically esterified with oligosaccharides to form water-soluble feruloylated oligosaccharides [42]. These conjugates exhibit synergistic physiological properties derived from both ferulic acid and oligosaccharides, while a minor fraction occurs in the free form [42]. Studies have shown that ferulic acid can influence the migration of neutrophils to tissues and inhibit the production of inflammatory factors, exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties [43]. Ibitoye et al. [44] found that ferulic acid enhances energy metabolism, increases the generation of reactive oxygen species, and boosts the activity of the electron transport chain, while simultaneously reducing glutathione levels, thereby enhancing the antibacterial activity of quinolone antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. Additionally, Chen et al. [45] developed a ferulic acid-conjugated sugar beet pulp pectin (FA-SBPP), which exhibited superior DPPH radical scavenging capacity compared to native SBPP. This enhanced antioxidant activity was attributed to structural modifications in SBPP, including altered chemical reactivity and polarity induced by feruloylation.

2.3.3. Food Manufacturing Applications

Recent studies also highlight rice bran’s potential for functional applications in food processing. Incorporation of 10–15% rice bran dietary fiber enhances baked goods by increasing bread specific volume, reducing crumb hardness, and extending shelf stability [13]. At 6% supplementation level in biscuits, rice bran soluble fiber decreases in vitro starch digestibility by 30% without compromising sensory attributes [46]. In lipid-based products, research indicates that adding rice bran extract reduces the peroxide value of fish oil, extending shelf life by 2–3 times [47]. Additionally, replacing 50–75% of animal fat with rice bran oil in sausage products optimizes the n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio with simultaneous improvements in texture [48].

3. Mechanisms of Rice Bran Rancidity

In intact brown rice, lipids are compartmentalized as lipid bodies within the aleurone layer and germ, whereas lipases are sequestered in the transverse cells of the seed coat. This spatial separation prevents lipids from undergoing rancidity [49]. However, during the milling process that produces rice bran, mechanical disruption of lipid body membranes allows lipases and oxidases in rice bran to directly interact with lipids. This interaction leads to hydrolysis and oxidation reactions, forming free radicals and volatile carbonyl compounds, which cause a rapid increase in the acid value of the rice bran [50]. Additionally, unesterified fatty acids can contribute to the development of bitter and musty flavors in the rice bran [51]. The primary rancidity pathways are summarized in Figure 2. Furthermore, the rate of rice bran rancidity is influenced by factors such as microbial activity, rice variety, and moisture content [52,53].

3.1. Hydrolytic Rancidity

In rice bran, enzymatic hydrolysis of lipids is typically limited under ambient conditions. However, elevated lipase activity in the presence of optimal pH, temperature, and moisture facilitates rapid adsorption of lipases at the oil-water interface, exposing their catalytic sites for substrate binding [54]. Subsequently, the substrate enters the enzyme’s active site, where a conserved catalytic triad (Ser-His-Asp/Glu) mediates hydrolysis [53]. This triad is structurally stabilized by a pentapeptide motif within an α/β hydrolase fold scaffold (Figure 3A). Upon activation, the proton from its hydroxyl group transfers to the imidazole ring of the His residue [55,56]. Meanwhile, the carbonyl carbon of the substrate is attacked by the nucleophilic Ser residue, forming an unstable intermediate complex (Figure 3B). The His-acquired proton is subsequently transferred to the alcohol moiety, cleaving the ester bond and releasing a free alcohol. Through this reaction, the Ser residue recombines with the carbonyl bond to form an ester group, resulting in an enzyme-acyl complex [53,57]. The deprotonated His imidazole ring then abstracts a proton from a water molecule. The resulting OH ion attacks the newly formed ester bond carbonyl carbon, leading to ester bond cleavage. Finally, the His imidazole ring transfers the proton back to the Ser residue, releasing free hydrolyzed fatty acids (Figure 3B).
Generally, the catalytic efficiency of lipases depends on the spatial proximity of triglyceride ester bonds to the Ser hydroxyl group and the enzyme’s substrate-binding geometry [59]. Higher lipase activity accelerates FFA release, exacerbating lipid degradation [60]. Sinha et al. [61] further identified lipase-mediated triglyceride hydrolysis as a key contributor to off-flavor formation in rice bran lipids. Consequently, lipase inactivation strategies are widely employed to enhance rice bran stability. For instance, He et al. [62] successfully extended shelf life by suppressing lipase activity via infrared radiation.

3.2. Oxidative Rancidity

Lipoxygenase (LOX), a key enzyme driving oxidative rancidity in rice bran, catalyzes the peroxidation of free unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., linoleic, linolenic, and arachidonic acids) into conjugated diene hydroperoxides [3,63]. This reaction, termed lipid peroxidation, is the primary oxidative pathway in rice bran lipids. LOX exhibits its highest catalytic activity towards free fatty acids, but it can also oxidize monoglycerides and triglycerides that contain unsaturated fatty acid side chains, albeit to a lesser extent [64,65]. Typically, in the presence of molecular oxygen, LOX catalyzes the oxidation of fatty acids containing a cis,cis-1,4-pentadiene structure, generating fatty acid hydroperoxides (FAHPO) [50]. In rice bran, LOX can catalytically add an oxygen molecule to either end of dienes, such as linoleic acid and linolenic acid, producing 9-hydroperoxides (9-HPOD) and 13-hydroperoxides (13-HPOD). Among the three LOX isoenzymes identified in the rice genome, i.e., LOX-1, LOX-2, and LOX-3, unsaturated fatty acids oxidized by LOX-1 and LOX-2 primarily form 13-HPOD, whereas LOX-3 catalyzes the formation of 9-HPOD [50]. FAHPO, as unstable intermediates, degrade into small-molecule metabolites via secondary pathways—hydroxy acids through reduction, ketones via oxidation, epoxy-hydroxy derivatives via isomerization, and volatile aldehydes/acids via decomposition [66]. The accumulation of these degradation products, particularly free fatty acids and volatile aldehydes, directly elevates the acid value (AV) of rice bran, making AV a critical marker for assessing rancidity severity [31]. Furthermore, GC-MS analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has emerged as a robust method to evaluate rice bran freshness by tracking aldehyde and ketone signatures [67].

3.3. Other Factors

3.3.1. Water Activity

Water activity (Aw) critically governs rice bran rancidity kinetics, as water molecules act as both reactants and solvents in hydrolytic rancidity [68]. Enzyme activity in foods typically correlates positively with Aw. For instance, stabilized rice bran exhibits elevated lipase activity upon moisture absorption during storage [69]. Higher Aw (>0.4) accelerates lipase activity and rancidity rates, whereas lower Aw (<0.2) slows lipid deterioration [70]. However, excessively low Aw can hinder rice bran storage: when Aw drops below the monolayer water threshold, the protective hydration layer on lipid surfaces dissipates, allowing oxygen molecules to directly contact the lipids, which accelerates oxidation [71]. Fresh rice bran typically exhibits Aw values of 0.6–0.7. Ling et al. [69] demonstrated that hot air-assisted radiofrequency stabilization optimizes storage stability at Aw 0.2–0.4, where free fatty acid accumulation and peroxide value (POV) rise minimally. Beyond Aw 0.4, FFA levels surge rapidly, while Aw <0.2 disproportionately accelerates POV elevation.

3.3.2. Microbial Contamination

In addition to enzymatic activity, microorganisms also play a significant role in rice bran rancidity. Rich in lipids and proteins, rice bran serves as an ideal substrate for microbial proliferation under high humidity and temperature conditions [72]. Molds are the predominant microorganisms encountered during the growth, storage, and processing of rice [73]. Crucially, mold-derived lipases synergize with endogenous enzymes to exacerbate hydrolytic rancidity [74]. Researchers [72] isolated five lipid-hydrolyzing Bacillus strains from rice bran, revealing that these bacteria account for approximately 25% of total lipid hydrolysis, independent of lipase activity. Despite this, much of the current research continues to focus on enzymatic effects, while microbial contamination’s role in rancidity is often underexplored.

3.3.3. Phenolic Compounds

Phenolic compounds, including tannins, anthocyanins, and flavonols, inhibit lipase activity and mitigate rancidity [75,76,77,78]. Zhang et al. [79] observed slower rancidity in red rice bran varieties compared to brown counterparts during accelerated aging, linking this to proanthocyanidin content. Chen et al. [80] studied different rice bran genotypes and further correlated reduced hydrolytic rancidity in purple rice bran with elevated levels of total phenolics, flavonoids, and anthocyanins, suggesting their role in suppressing lipase (LA)-mediated hydrolysis. Raghavendra et al. [81] explored how chlorogenic acid and caffeic acid inhibit rice bran lipase and found that both polyphenols interact with lipase through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, thereby inhibiting its activity. While high phenolic content enhances rancidity resistance in colored rice bran (e.g., red and purple varieties) [82,83], the molecular mechanisms remain poorly characterized, necessitating further research into structure-activity relationships.

4. Non-Thermal Stabilization Technologies for Rice Bran

4.1. Thermal Stabilization Strategies

As delineated by rice bran rancidity mechanisms, lipase activity and water activity (Aw) constitute the primary drivers of lipid deterioration. As such, thermal stabilization protocols focus on dual objectives: (1) lipase inactivation to suppress enzymatic hydrolysis-driven rancidity, and (2) Aw reduction to impede free fatty acid accumulation, thereby extending shelf life [7] (Table 2).
Dry heating, a conventional method, employs hot air to reduce moisture and lipase activity; however, prolonged treatment compromises protein solubility and vitamin E retention [84,85,86]. Moist heat via steam or superheated steam (100–160 °C) achieves more uniform enzyme inactivation while enhancing γ-oryzanol content, though post-treatment drying is required [87,88,89]. Microwave irradiation induces rapid dielectric heating, retaining phenolic compounds and γ-oryzanol but reducing flavonoids [93,94,95]. Ohmic heating leverages electrical resistance to generate internal heat, preserving 55–92% of bioactive components while effectively suppressing lipase, yet its application is limited by sample conductivity requirements [101,102,103]. Infrared radiation combines thermal and drying effects, maintaining proximate nutrients and improving polysaccharide extraction efficiency, albeit with significant tocopherol loss [22,97,98,99,100]. Emerging radio frequency (RF) heating demonstrates superior penetration and uniformity, reducing LA/LOX activities to <19.2% and 5.5%, respectively, with minimal impact on proteins and lipids [90,91,92]. Extrusion utilizes thermo-mechanical shear to inactivate LOX (>99%) and LA (residual~32%), increasing soluble fiber but degrading heat-sensitive phytochemicals [90,91,92]. Comparatively, microwave and RF methods strike a balance between enzyme inactivation efficiency and nutrient retention, while extrusion suits large-scale stabilization despite structural damage. Optimal approaches should align with targeted applications, weighing factors such as energy consumption, scalability, and preservation of functional components like tocopherols and phenolics.

4.2. Non-Thermal Stabilization Technologies

In contrast to conventional thermal strategies, which often degrade heat-sensitive nutrients during enzymatic inactivation, non-thermal technologies enable enzyme suppression at ambient or low temperatures via physical (e.g., reactive species, pressure) or biological (e.g., protease catalysis) mechanisms. These approaches address hydrolytic and oxidative rancidity while maximizing nutrient retention, positioning them as transformative solutions for high-value rice bran valorization. Table 3 provides a systematic comparison of four key non-thermal methods.

4.2.1. Low-Temperature Plasma

Plasma is commonly referred to as the fourth state of matter, and it exhibits unique physicochemical properties. Physically, it constitutes an ionized gas comprising ions, electrons, and neutral particles, remaining electrically neutral overall [112,113]. Plasma is categorized as high- or low-temperature based on operational thermal conditions. High-temperature plasma (ion energy: 0.1–4.0 eV; current: 1–100 A) facilitates intense chaotic motion, primarily applied in mechanical machining and refractory metallurgy. In contrast, low-temperature plasma generates ions with energies between 0.03 and 0.05 eV, and its system temperature is close to room temperature [104]. This prevents any adverse effects on the treated material that may arise from extreme temperature changes. Currently, low-temperature plasma technology has found widespread applications in fields such as catalytic reactions [105,114], wastewater treatment [115], sterilization [116,117], and food processing [118,119,120]. Figure 4 illustrates the various types of low-temperature plasma generation.
The stabilization mechanism of low-temperature plasma operates via dual pathways: energy-efficient ion fluxes directed by external electric fields interact with material surfaces to induce pitting and microcracks, thereby altering physicochemical properties [122,123], while reactive species such as excited-state particles, reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS), and hydroxyl radicals degrade microbial contaminants and suppress enzymatic oxidation, collectively enhancing material stability [124,125,126]. However, ROS such as ozone—generated in oxygen-containing atmospheres—pose oxidation risks to unsaturated lipids in rice bran. To address this, ozone-free plasma configurations using inert gases (e.g., nitrogen, argon) or vacuum-mode systems require precise parameter optimization to suppress ozone generation. Compared to conventional thermal methods, low-temperature plasma demonstrates superior performance in preserving nutritional quality, extending shelf life, and retaining bioactive compounds [127,128].
Recent studies have increasingly explored the application of low-temperature plasma technology in cereal stability research. Tolouie et al. [129] demonstrated reductions of 60–75% in lipase and lipoxygenase (LOX) activities in wheat germ following plasma treatment. Saberi et al. [130] observed plasma-induced modulation of soluble protein degradation kinetics in cereals. Los et al. [131] reported variability in microbial inactivation efficiency depending on plasma type and grain species. Additionally, some researchers have filed patents for the use of low-temperature plasma to stabilize rice bran, proposing a method that rapidly stabilizes rice bran’s nutritional components with plasma treatment. This approach achieves >85% lipase inactivation, suppresses free fatty acid (FFA) accumulation by 40–60%, and delays oxidation onset by 2–3 weeks while preserving over 95% of native nutrients [31]. The non-thermal nature and rapid action of low-temperature plasma position it as a promising candidate for industrial rice bran stabilization, particularly for high-value nutraceutical markets. Its ability to simultaneously inactivate lipases and suppress microbial loads [132] could streamline processing by eliminating separate sterilization steps, reducing energy costs compared to thermal methods. However, scalability hinges on resolving challenges such as gas composition optimization and continuous-flow system design for bulk processing. Modular plasma reactors, currently prototyped for cereal grains [64] and legumes [133], could be adapted to rice bran lines with minimal retrofitting. Additionally, regulatory alignment and consumer education on “cold-processed” labeling are critical for market acceptance [134].

4.2.2. High-Energy Electron Beam (HEEB) Irradiation

Electron beam irradiation processing technology involves the use of γ-rays, X-rays with energies below 5 MeV, or 10 MeV electron beams to treat food through the physical, chemical, and biological effects of ionizing radiation interacting with matter. These processes are employed for disinfection, sterilization, pest control, and preservation [106,107]. Among these, γ-ray technology is the most developed, and 60Co γ-rays are commonly used for sterilizing and preserving food [135]. However, the irradiation methods have not proven effective in stabilizing rice bran. In contrast, high-energy electron beam (HEEB) irradiation—characterized by operational safety, precise controllability, scalability, and elimination of toxic residues—has emerged as a superior stabilization method for rice bran [136].
The principle behind stabilizing rice bran with HEEB irradiation is [137,138]: HEEBs generated by an accelerator directly damage the DNA within the active cells of rice bran or indirectly irradiate water and small molecules, generating active free radicals such as ·H and ·OH. These radicals then cross-link with nuclear materials. Low irradiation doses (2–6 kGy) effectively suppress pest activity and hydrolytic rancidity without compromising nutritional integrity. Figure 5 illustrates the configuration of HEEB equipment. The advantages of this technology include: (1) Directed electron beam radiation that maximizes resource utilization; (2) High efficiency, with treatment capacity 2.8 to 3.0 times that of γ-rays at the same power; (3) Flexible adjustments, with the ability to quickly alter the radiation dose by adjusting the conveyor speed; and (4) Energy-efficient and safe operation, with radiation easily stopped by turning off the power [139,140,141].
Shad [143] demonstrated dose-dependent lipase inactivation in rice, with activity reduced to 54.84% of baseline at 10 kGy, while sensory and nutritional profiles remained unaffected across doses (0–10 kGy). This indicates that high-energy electron beam irradiation effectively stabilizes rice bran. Furthermore, the study showed that electron beam irradiation increases the carbonyl content of lipase as the dose increases, while decreasing the total thiol group content and reducing the secondary structure and protein content of lipase. Beyond rice bran, HEEB irradiation inhibits cell wall-degrading enzymes in kiwifruit by 45–78% while preserving cellular ultrastructure [144]. HEEB irradiation’s precision and scalability offer unique advantages for industrial rice bran stabilization, particularly in regions with stringent pest-control regulations. Its ability to suppress hydrolytic rancidity without nutrient loss aligns with clean-label trends, while throughput rates enhance cost efficiency [89,106]. However, industrial adoption requires addressing dose uniformity in dense bran matrices and equipment costs for high-power accelerators [139]. Integration with existing milling infrastructure, such as conveyor-based systems with adjustable speed, could optimize dosing for bulk processing. Pilot partnerships, such as those testing HEEB-stabilized bran in gluten-free flours [89], could validate commercial viability while ensuring compliance with global food safety standards.

4.2.3. Ultra-High Pressure Stabilization

Ultra-high pressure processing (UHP) is a non-thermal technique that involves treating materials in sealed vessels at 100–1000 MPa for 20–40 min under controlled temperatures (20–40 °C). This process inactivates spoilage enzymes while enhancing food quality attributes through molecular-level modifications [145]. As one of the most industrially advanced non-thermal method, UHP achieves enzyme suppression via pressure-induced cleavage or rearrangement of hydrophobic interactions and ionic bonds in proteins, alongside structural alterations to non-covalent molecular configurations [108,109,110].
Rice bran’s enzymatic deterioration, driven by lipases, proteases, and oxidases, can be effectively mitigated through UHP. The process subjects rice bran to hydrostatic pressures exceeding 100 MPa in high-strength vessels, significantly improving storage stability by disrupting protease tertiary structures [146]. Mechanistically, high pressure destabilizes salt bridges, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic interactions critical for enzymatic spatial conformations. The subsequent dissociation of peptide chains disrupts the α-helix/β-sheet secondary structures, exposing catalytic sites to aqueous degradation [147,148].
Studies demonstrate that UHP at 200–500 MPa significantly reduces hydrolytic and oxidative rancidity during storage. For instance, HPP at 200 MPa for 10 min minimized fat acidity and conjugated diene formation in brown rice, preserving nutritional quality while suppressing lipase activity [149]. Hydration levels during UHP further influence outcomes: treatments at ≥30% hydration reduced microbial load and modified structural properties, inducing particle aggregation and enhancing soluble dietary fiber (8.73 to 11.03 g/100 g at 15% hydration). HPP also improved emulsifying stability across hydration levels, attributed to protein structural modifications [146]. These findings underscore HPP’s dual role in microbial safety and functional enhancement, though parameter optimization (pressure, time, hydration) is critical to balance rice bran stability and techno-functional outcomes. Despite rice bran’s inherently low moisture, UHP application typically requires transient hydration to enable pressure transmission [150]. Post-treatment drying restores the powdered form while retaining UHP-induced stability improvements. For instance, spray drying post-UHP not only reduces water activity but also enhances particle uniformity and oxidative stability through controlled matrix densification [151]. Further innovations in hybrid UHP-drying systems are critical to commercial scalability, balancing metabolic inactivation with cost-efficient, industry-aligned workflows.

4.2.4. Enzymatic Stabilization

The biological method for stabilizing rice bran, also known as enzyme-based stabilization, primarily involves using proteases to break down lipases [152]. The advantages of this method include the ability to target specific enzymes under mild reaction conditions, thus preserving the nutritional components of rice bran, with the added benefit of simplicity in operation [16]. Conventional free-enzyme systems, despite high specificity and low energy input, face limitations including enzyme denaturation, poor operational control, and non-recyclability [153,154]. Recent advances address these challenges through enzyme immobilization techniques such as magnetic nanoparticle fixation [155]. Immobilized enzymes are prepared by fixing free enzymes onto appropriate carriers using physical or chemical techniques. In recent years, this technology has found broad application in the food industry, including food storage, food processing, food additives, and active peptide preparation [156,157,158]. In a comparative study, papain achieved 79% lipase inactivation after 120 min, which is comparable to trypsin (80%) and chymotrypsin (86%), while bromelain and Flavourzyme paradoxically elevate lipase activity by 12–15% [152]. Enzymatically stabilized rice bran (ESRB) outperforms thermally stabilized (TSRB) and raw rice bran (RRB) in antioxidant retention, retaining 52.89% more free phenolics and 2.23-fold higher γ-oryzanol than RRB. Post-storage analyses after 60 days at 25 °C reveal ESRB’s superior stability: free fatty acid content remains at 3.92%, contrasting sharply with RRB (15.30%) and TSRB (4.67%), attributed to sustained lipase inactivation and the antimicrobial effects of liberated phenolics.
Compared to free enzymes, immobilized enzymes offer advantages such as increased stability, easy recovery, reusability, and cost reduction, effectively compensating for the limitations of free enzymes [153]. A recent approach by Yu et al. [159] utilized surfactant-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for papain immobilization (Figure 6). Surface functionalization of these nanoparticles prevented aggregation while facilitating magnetic separation (92% recovery efficiency) and enhanced enzyme loading capacity (12.8 mg papain/g carrier). Optimal stabilization parameters (1:6 enzyme-to-substrate ratio, pH 8.0, 0.36 mg/g immobilized papain, 65 °C, 120 min) achieved sustained lipase inactivation (78% activity reduction) with minimal nutrient loss (<5% tocopherol degradation). After five cycles of reuse, the enzyme activity retention was over 88%, and after eight cycles, it was over 72%. These results demonstrate the promising potential of magnetic immobilized papain for rice bran stabilization [159].
The advantages of immobilized enzymes method include [160,161,162,163]: First, the use of nano-magnetic particles, whose porous structure increases the surface area for enzyme contact, allowing for higher enzyme concentration per unit mass of particles. Second, the rice bran suspension can continuously contact the magnetic particles and be quickly separated, improving mass transfer and heat transfer rates, which accelerates the catalytic reaction rate. Third, the reactivity of free papain is enhanced after magnetic immobilization, and it can be rapidly separated under the influence of an external magnetic field, making it convenient for repeated use. Enzymatic stabilization, particularly with immobilized systems, presents a sustainable pathway for industrial rice bran valorization. However, carrier costs (e.g., Fe3O4 nanoparticles) and batch-to-batch consistency in enzyme loading require optimization [164]. Integration into continuous bioreactors, inspired by dairy [165] and brewing industries [166,167], could enhance throughput while leveraging rice bran’s inherent phenolics for antimicrobial synergy. Regulatory frameworks must evolve to classify immobilized enzymes as processing aids rather than additives, simplifying compliance [168].

5. Limitations and Future Perspectives

While non-thermal stabilization methods offer significant advantages over thermal approaches, several critical limitations must be addressed to advance their industrial adoption. Microbial contamination remains underexplored but critical, as synergistic interactions between microbial lipases and endogenous enzymes exacerbate rancidity [50]. Parameter optimization across technologies—e.g., hydration levels in ultra-high-pressure (UHP) processing, irradiation doses in electron beam treatments, and enzyme-substrate ratios—requires systematic investigation to balance nutrient retention with techno-functional outcomes [169,170]. Scalability challenges persist for cold plasma and HEEB irradiation due to equipment complexity and operational costs [137,138], necessitating industrial validation [171]. At a mechanistic level, cold plasma’s molecular interactions (e.g., reactive ionic species’ roles in lipid oxidation) [172] and UHP’s pressure-time-hydration matrices demand deeper interrogation to optimize enzyme inactivation [171] while preserving structural integrity [145,173].
Future research must prioritize interdisciplinary innovations to address these gaps. Hybrid non-thermal approaches, such as combining UHP with magnetic fields, or cold plasma with enzymatic pre-treatment, could synergistically mitigate oxidative and hydrolytic rancidity. For instance, the combination of UPH treatment with magnetic field have been demonstrated to effectively mitigate the denaturation of myofibrillar proteins during the storage period of grass carp fillets [174]. Concurrently, breakthroughs in material science—such as silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles for enzyme immobilization [175] and modified biofilms with enhanced techno-functional properties [176,177] to mitigate irradiation-induced polymer degradation—are critical for optimizing scalability and sustainability [139]. These innovations not only improve process efficiency but also align with circular economy principles by enabling recyclable catalysts and bio-based packaging solutions. To fully harness these advancements, deeper mechanistic insights into enzyme-substrate interactions under non-thermal conditions are essential. While cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and synchrotron-based analyses have demonstrated success in mapping conformational dynamics of other enzymes [178], their application to lipase structural behavior under cold plasma conditions remains unexplored. Future studies could harness these techniques to resolve ROS-mediated inactivation mechanisms at near-atomic resolution, particularly by capturing transient structural deformations and oxidative damage hotspots during plasma exposure. Such insights may uncover strategies to engineer ROS-resistant lipase variants, paving the way for optimizing enzyme stability in plasma-driven bioprocessing systems [179].

6. Conclusions

Rice bran, a byproduct of rice milling, is rich in nutrients and bioactive compounds. However, its high lipase activity leads to rapid rancidity, limiting its shelf life and potential for high-value applications. Traditional stabilization methods, such as chemical treatments and thermal processes, have been employed to address this issue. While effective to some extent, these methods often result in nutrient degradation and are not always suitable for large-scale industrial applications. As a result, recent advancements in non-thermal stabilization technologies have gained considerable attention, offering promising alternatives to traditional methods. Technologies such as low-temperature plasma, high-energy electron beam irradiation, and ultra-high pressure processing have demonstrated significant success in improving the shelf life and nutritional quality of rice bran. These methods are particularly advantageous due to their ability to preserve bioactive compounds, prevent enzymatic degradation, and extend product stability without compromising the nutritional value of rice bran. While non-thermal stabilization technologies offer significant advantages, ongoing research is essential to optimize these methods. Addressing current limitations and exploring the synergistic effects of combining different stabilization techniques will be crucial in enhancing the efficiency, sustainability, and commercial viability of rice bran stabilization. By addressing these gaps, non-thermal technologies can propel rice bran from an underutilized byproduct to a cornerstone of sustainable, functional food innovation, aligning with global demands for nutrient-rich, eco-friendly ingredients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z.; methodology, L.Z.; investigation, L.Z., J.H., Y.D., F.L. and W.X.; data curation, J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, S.L.; visualization, L.Z. and J.H.; supervision, S.L.; project administration, S.L.; funding acquisition, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2024YFF1106105), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2023M731390), Senior Talent Program of Jiangsu University (No. 20JDG43, No. 20JDG074), Jiangsu University college students innovation and entrepreneurship training program (No. 202410299830X).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tufail, T.; Ain, H.B.U.; Chen, J.; Virk, M.S.; Ahmed, Z.; Ashraf, J.; Shahid, N.U.A.; Xu, B. Contemporary Views of the Extraction, Health Benefits, and Industrial Integration of Rice Bran Oil: A Prominent Ingredient for Holistic Human Health. Foods 2024, 13, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zafar, S.; Jianlong, X. Recent Advances to Enhance Nutritional Quality of Rice. Rice Sci. 2023, 30, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bollinedi, H.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, N.; S, G.K.; Bhowmick, P.K.; K K, V.; M, N.; R K, E. Genetic and genomic approaches to address rapid rancidity of rice bran. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, B.; Zhao, L.; Xu, B.; Deng, B.; Liu, Y.; Dong, Y. Rice bran real-time stabilisation technology with flowing microwave radiation: Its impact on rancidity and some bioactive compounds. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2018, 10, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dabbour, M.; He, R.; Ma, H.; Musa, A. Optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of protein from sunflower meal and its physicochemical and functional properties. J. Food Process Eng. 2018, 41, e12799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Estévez, M.; Díaz-Velasco, S.; Martínez, R. Protein carbonylation in food and nutrition: A concise update. Amino Acids 2022, 54, 559–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dubey, B.N. Comparative Study on the Rice Bran Stabilization Processes: A Review. Res. Dev. Mater. Sci. 2019, 11, 1147–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sethi, S.; Kaur, L.; Nath, P.; Yadav, D.N. Bioactive Compounds and Phytonutrients From Cereals. In Plant-Based Bioactive Compounds and Food Ingredients; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2023; pp. 155–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, Y.W.; Zhao, J.W.; Jin, Z.Y.; Tian, Y.Q.; Zhou, X.; Long, J. Improvement of rice bran modified by extrusion combined with ball milling on the quality of steamed brown rice cake. J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 99, 103229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, N.N.; Ma, Z.Q.; Li, H.H.; Tian, X.H.; Fang, Y.; Tan, B. Nutritional and cooking quality improvement of brown rice noodles prepared with extruded rice bran. Cereal Chem. 2021, 98, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ayoub, W.S.; Zahoor, I.; Dar, A.H.; Anjum, N.; Pandiselvam, R.; Farooq, S.; Rusu, A.V.; Rocha, J.M.; Trif, M.; Jeevarathinam, G. Effect of incorporation of wheat bran, rice bran and banana peel powder on the mesostructure and physicochemical characteristics of biscuits. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1016717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, J.; Kim, H.-S. Rice-Based Gluten-Free Foods and Technologies: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gul, K.; Yousuf, B.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, P.; Wani, A.A. Rice bran: Nutritional values and its emerging potential for development of functional food—A review. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2015, 6, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, R.; Feng, X.; Li, W.; Yuan, L.; Ge, J.; Lu, D.; Chen, B.; Yu, G. Changes in properties of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) protein during thermal denaturation. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Shao, F.; Wan, X.; Zhang, H.; Cai, M.; Hu, K.; Duan, Y. Effects of rapeseed protein addition on soybean protein-based textured protein produced by low-moisture extrusion: Changes in physicochemical attributes, structural properties and barrel flow behaviors. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 149, 109631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.Q.; Strappe, P.; Zhou, Z.K.; Blanchard, C. Impact on the nutritional attributes of rice bran following various stabilization procedures. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 59, 2458–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, X.; Zhang, Z.H.; Qi, X.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Brennan, C.S.; Yan, J.K. Application of nonthermal processing technologies in extracting and modifying polysaccharides: A critical review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 4367–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Mintah, B.K.; Xu, H.; Dabbour, M.; Cheng, Y.; Dai, C.; He, R.; Ma, H. Effects of nonthermal physical processing technologies on functional, structural properties and digestibility of food protein: A review. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e14010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tolouie, H.; Mohammadifar, M.A.; Ghomi, H.; Yaghoubi, A.S.; Hashemi, M. The impact of atmospheric cold plasma treatment on inactivation of lipase and lipoxygenase of wheat germs. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 47, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, H.W.; Hsu, C.P.; Wang, C.Y. Healthy expectations of high hydrostatic pressure treatment in food processing industry. J. Food Drug Anal. 2020, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, P.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lu, J.; Zhang, C.-Q.; Liu, Q.-Q.; Li, Q.-F. Genes and Their Molecular Functions Determining Seed Structure, Components, and Quality of Rice. Rice 2022, 15, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, B.; Khir, R.; Pan, Z.; Wood, D.; Mahoney, N.E.; El-Mashad, H.; Wu, B.; Ma, H.; Liu, X. Simultaneous decontamination and drying of rough rice using combined pulsed light and holding treatment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 96, 2874–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, C.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Zuo, M.; Liu, S. Integrated Analysis of Metabolome and Volatile Profiles of Germinated Brown Rice from the Japonica and Indica Subspecies. Foods 2021, 10, 2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shakri, A.N.A.; Kasim, K.F.; Rukunudin, I.B. Chemical Compositions and Physical Properties of Selected Malaysian Rice: A Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 765, 012024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fan, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Daglia, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Bai, J.; Zhu, L.; Xiao, X. Recent advances in targeted manipulation of the gut microbiome by prebiotics: From taxonomic composition to metabolic function. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 49, 100959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, K.; Luo, Z.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.; Miao, X.; Tao, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Zeng, X. Biological Roles of Lipids in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, L.; Wen, S.; Ye, Q.; Lou, H.; Gao, Y.; Bajpai, V.K.; Carpena, M.; Prieto, M.-A.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Xiao, J.; et al. Advances on delta 5-unsaturated-polymethylene-interrupted fatty acids: Resources, biosynthesis, and benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 63, 767–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, W.-S.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Z.-Y. Plant Sterols: Chemical and Enzymatic Structural Modifications and Effects on Their Cholesterol-Lowering Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3047–3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Obadi, M.; Xu, B. Effect of processing methods and storage on the bioactive compounds of black rice (Oryza sativa L.): A review. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 9100–9122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, B.; Mahoney, N.E.; Pan, Z.; Khir, R.; Wu, B.; Ma, H.; Zhao, L. Effectiveness of pulsed light treatment for degradation and detoxification of aflatoxin B1 and B2 in rough rice and rice bran. Food Control 2016, 59, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yılmaz Tuncel, N. Stabilization of Rice Bran: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, W.; Yang, W.; Wu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, T.; Ampofo, K.A.; Ma, H.; Cui, F.; Yang, X.; et al. ARTP Mutagenesis to Improve Mycelial Polysaccharide Production of Grifola frondosa Using a Mixture of Wheat Bran and Rice Bran as Substrate. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 6110743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dzah, C.S.; Duan, Y.Q.; Zhang, H.H.; Boateng, N.A.S.; Ma, H.L. Latest developments in polyphenol recovery and purification from plant by-products: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kittipongpatana, O.S.; Trisopon, K.; Wattanaarsakit, P.; Kittipongpatana, N. Utilization and Evaluation of Rice Bran and Rice Bran Wax as a Tablet Lubricant. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, Q.; Liu, P.; Xu, Z.X.; He, Z.X.; Wang, Q. Bio-fuel oil characteristic of rice bran wax pyrolysis. Renew. Energy 2018, 119, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Punia, S.; Kumar, M.; Siroha, A.K.; Purewal, S.S. Rice Bran Oil: Emerging Trends in Extraction, Health Benefit, and Its Industrial Application. Rice Sci. 2021, 28, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dai, C.; He, R.; Ma, H. Alkali extraction of rice residue protein isolates: Effects of alkali treatment conditions on lysinoalanine formation and structural characterization of lysinoalanine-containing protein. Food Chem. 2018, 261, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zaky, A.A.; Abd El-Aty, A.M.; Ma, A.; Jia, Y. An overview on antioxidant peptides from rice bran proteins: Extraction, identification, and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 62, 1350–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rivero Meza, S.L.; Cañizares, L.; Dannenberg, B.; Peres, B.B.; Rodrigues, L.A.; Mardade, C.; de Leon, M.A.; Gaioso, C.A.; Egea, I.; de Oliveira, M. Sustainable rice bran protein: Composition, extraction, quality properties and applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 145, 104355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alves, J.B.; Rodrigues, M.H.P.; Duarte, F.A.; Furlong, E.B.; Christ-Ribeiro, A. Rice Bran and Its Potential To Complement the Nutritional Needs of Children and Elderly. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2022, 78, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peanparkdee, M.; Borompichaichartkul, C.; Iwamoto, S. Bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and anthocyanins of encapsulated Thai rice bran extracts during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2021, 361, 130161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cai, W.-D.; Zhu, J.; Wu, L.-X.; Qiao, Z.-R.; Li, L.; Yan, J.-K. Preparation, characterization, rheological and antioxidant properties of ferulic acid-grafted curdlan conjugates. Food Chem. 2019, 300, 125221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, C.; Cai, W.D.; Yao, J.; Wu, L.X.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Yan, J.K. Conjugation of ferulic acid onto pectin affected the physicochemical, functional and antioxidant properties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5352–5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ibitoye, O.B.; Ajiboye, T.O. Ferulic acid potentiates the antibacterial activity of quinolone-based antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, H.; Niu, H.; Zhang, H.; Yun, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhong, Q.; Chen, W.; Fu, X. Preparation and properties of ferulic acid-sugar beet pulp pectin ester and its application as a physical and antioxidative stabilizer in a fish oil-water emulsion. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jia, M.; Yu, Q.; Chen, J.; He, Z.; Chen, Y.; Xie, J.; Nie, S.; Xie, M. Physical quality and in vitro starch digestibility of biscuits as affected by addition of soluble dietary fiber from defatted rice bran. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 99, 105349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rohfritsch, Z.; Canelli, G.; Pollien, P.; Bel-Rhlid, R. Wheat and Rice Bran as Natural Additives for the Protection of Fish Oil from Oxidation. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Issara, U. Improvement of Thai Sweet Sausage (Goon Chiang) Properties by Oleogel Made of Rice Bran Wax and Rice Bran Oil: A Textural, Sensorial, and Nutritional Aspect. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 995, 012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Juliano, B.O.; Tuaño, A.P.P. Gross structure and composition of the rice grain. In Rice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 31–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bhunia, R.K.; Sinha, K.; Kaur, R.; Kaur, S.; Chawla, K. A Holistic View of the Genetic Factors Involved in Triggering Hydrolytic and Oxidative Rancidity of Rice Bran Lipids. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 39, 441–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, H.; Man, Z.-x.; Kang, W.-c.; Guan, B.-b.; Chen, Q.-s.; Xue, Z.-l. A novel colorimetric sensor array based on boron-dipyrromethene dyes for monitoring the storage time of rice. Food Chem. 2018, 268, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guan, B.; Zhao, J.; Jin, H.; Lin, H. Determination of Rice Storage Time with Colorimetric Sensor Array. Food Anal. Methods 2016, 10, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Q.; Liu, K.; Cai, G.; Yang, X.; Ngo, J.C.K. Developing Lipase Inhibitor as a Novel Approach to Address the Rice Bran Rancidity Issue—A Critical Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 3277–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, G.; Khan, I.M.; He, W.; Li, Y.; Jin, P.; Campanella, O.H.; Zhang, H.; Huo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H.; et al. Rebuilding the lid region from conformational and dynamic features to engineering applications of lipase in foods: Current status and future prospects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 2688–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yu, C.; Peng, B.; Luo, T.; Deng, Z. Bound lipase: An important form of lipase in rice bran (Oryza sativa). Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1779–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mu, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Xu, B. Study of the interfacial activity of wheat germ lipase. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2019, 11, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, C.; Yang, H.; Jia, L.; Zhao, L.; Gong, F.; Tan, C.; Tao, H.; He, W.S. Improved antioxidant activity of rutin via lipase-mediated esterification with oleic acid. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 3489–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. De Simone, A. Engineering the Genetic Code of Escherichia coli with Methionine Analogues and Bioorthogonal Amino Acids for Protein Immobilization; Technische Universitaet Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu, B.; Wang, L.K.; Miao, W.J.; Wu, Q.F.; Liu, Y.X.; Sun, Y.; Gao, C. Thermal versus Microwave Inactivation Kinetics of Lipase and Lipoxygenase from Wheat Germ. J. Food Process Eng. 2015, 39, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, B.; Zhao, L.; Chen, H.; Sun, D.; Deng, B.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F. Inactivation of Lipase and Lipoxygenase of Wheat Germ with Temperature-Controlled Short Wave Infrared Radiation and Its Effect on Storage Stability and Quality of Wheat Germ Oil. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sinha, K.; Kaur, R.; Singh, N.; Kaur, S.; Rishi, V.; Bhunia, R.K. Mobilization of storage lipid reserve and expression analysis of lipase and lipoxygenase genes in rice (Oryza sativa var. Pusa Basmati 1) bran during germination. Phytochemistry 2020, 180, 112538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. He, R.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ding, C.; Wu, Y.; Ju, X. Storage characteristics of infrared radiation stabilized rice bran and its shelf-life evaluation by prediction modeling. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2638–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Li, P.; Geng, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Xu, W. Recombinant Porcine 12-Lipoxygenase Catalytic Domain: Effect of Inhibitors, Selectivity of Substrates and Specificity of Oxidation Products of Linoleic Acid. Foods 2022, 11, 980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhou, C.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, B.; Hu, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhai, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Air and Argon Cold Plasma Effects on Lipolytic Enzymes Inactivation, Physicochemical Properties and Volatile Profiles of Lightly-Milled Rice. Food Chem. 2024, 445, 138699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lin, H.; Jiang, H.; Lin, J.; Chen, Q.; Ali, S.; Teng, S.W.; Zuo, M. Rice Freshness Identification Based on Visible Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Colorimetric Sensor Array. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kontogianni, V.G.; Gerothanassis, I.P. Analytical and Structural Tools of Lipid Hydroperoxides: Present State and Future Perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, Y.; Fan, M.; Wang, L.; Qian, H. Analysis of the aroma volatile compounds in different stabilized rice bran during storage. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mohammadi, F.; Marti, A.; Nayebzadeh, K.; Hosseini, S.M.; Tajdar-oranj, B.; Jazaeri, S. Effect of washing, soaking and pH in combination with ultrasound on enzymatic rancidity, phytic acid, heavy metals and coliforms of rice bran. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 127583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ling, B.; Lyng, J.G.; Wang, S. Effects of hot air-assisted radio frequency heating on enzyme inactivation, lipid stability and product quality of rice bran. LWT 2018, 91, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barden, L.; Decker, E.A. Lipid Oxidation in Low-moisture Food: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 56, 2467–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Velasco, J.; Dobarganes, C.; Márquez-Ruiz, G. Oxidative rancidity in foods and food quality. In Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Food and Beverages; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, C.-w.; Luo, T.; Cao, Y.; Wei, C.-h.; Deng, Z.-y. The influence of microbial contamination on rice bran rancidity. LWT 2021, 146, 111468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sunli, C.; Jun, S.; Hanping, M.; Xiaohong, W.; Pei, W.; Xiaodong, Z. Non-destructive detection for mold colonies in rice based on hyperspectra and GWO-SVR. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 98, 1453–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ortenero, J.R.; Choi, A.E.S.; Calingacion, M.S. A Review of the Different Sensors for the Detection of Rice Rancidity Indicators. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2024, 114, 421–426. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tan, Y.; Chang, S.K.C.; Zhang, Y. Comparison of α-amylase, α-glucosidase and lipase inhibitory activity of the phenolic substances in two black legumes of different genera. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xiao, Z.; He, L.; Hou, X.; Wei, J.; Ma, X.; Gao, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, J.; Li, P.; Yue, T. Relationships between Structure and Antioxidant Capacity and Activity of Glycosylated Flavonols. Foods 2021, 10, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fabroni, S.; Ballistreri, G.; Amenta, M.; Romeo, F.V.; Rapisarda, P. Screening of the anthocyanin profile and in vitro pancreatic lipase inhibition by anthocyanin-containing extracts of fruits, vegetables, legumes and cereals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 4713–4723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Qi, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hassane Hamadou, A.; Shen, Q.; Xu, B. Tempering–preservation treatment inactivated lipase in wheat bran and retained phenolic compounds. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 57, 2104–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, Y.; He, C.; Wu, Y.; Yang, J.; Xuan, H.; Zhu, X. Effect of lipoxygenase activity and red seed coat on rice bran deterioration. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1904–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, M.-H.; Bergman, C.J.; McClung, A.M. Hydrolytic rancidity and its association with phenolics in rice bran. Food Chem. 2019, 285, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Raghavendra, M.P.; Kumar, P.R.; Prakash, V. Mechanism of Inhibition of Rice Bran Lipase by Polyphenols: A Case Study with Chlorogenic Acid and Caffeic Acid. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, E412–E419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jin, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, S.; Liu, J.; Gao, R.; Jiang, P. Characterization of volatile organic compounds of different pigmented rice after puffing based on gas chromatography-ion migration spectrometry and chemometrics. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, Y.; Tang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wu, J.; Sun, Z.; Zuo, M.; Cai, J.; Zhai, X.; Zhou, C.; Shi, J.; et al. Comparative study on physicochemical, nutritional and cooking properties of different pigmented dehusked rice varieties influenced by superheated steam treatment. J. Cereal Sci. 2024, 117, 103934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Osae, R.; Essilfie, G.; Alolga, R.N.; Akaba, S.; Song, X.; Owusu-Ansah, P.; Zhou, C. Application of non-thermal pretreatment techniques on agricultural products prior to drying: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2585–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lv, S.W.; Sun, L.H.; Zhao, S.Y.; Bao, Y.M. Effect of dry heat stabilisation on the functional properties of rice bran proteins. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 1836–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xiaofei, S.; Wenxue, Z.; Xinling, L.; Jinling, F. Effects of heat pump drying temperature and dietary fat on carrot β-carotene bioaccessibility. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2017, 10, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, Z.; Guo, D.; Li, X.; Tang, Z.; Ling, X.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, B. Heat-Moisture Treatment Further Reduces In Vitro Digestibility and Enhances Resistant Starch Content of a High-Resistant Starch and Low-Glutelin Rice. Foods 2021, 10, 2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kim, S.-M.; Chung, H.-J.; Lim, S.-T. Effect of various heat treatments on rancidity and some bioactive compounds of rice bran. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, H.-T.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y.; Pan, W.; Bao, Y. Physical modification of high amylose starch using electron beam irradiation and heat moisture treatment: The effect on multi-scale structure and in vitro digestibility. Food Chem. 2023, 424, 136344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cai, C.; Wei, B.; Tian, Y.; Ma, R.; Chen, L.; Qiu, L.; Jin, Z. Structural changes of chemically modified rice starch by one-step reactive extrusion. Food Chem. 2019, 288, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dang, T.T.; Vasanthan, T. Modification of rice bran dietary fiber concentrates using enzyme and extrusion cooking. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 89, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mushtaq, B.S.; Al-Ansi, W.; Dhungle, A.; Haq, F.u.; Mahdi, A.A.; Walayat, N.; Manzoor, M.S.; Nawaz, A.; Fan, M.; Qian, H.; et al. Influence of pretreatments combined with extrusion on γ-amino butyric acid, nutritional composition and physicochemical properties of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). J. Cereal Sci. 2021, 102, 103359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, K.; Sun, J.; Xu, B. Evaluation of the possible non-thermal effect of microwave radiation on the inactivation of wheat germ lipase. J. Food Process Eng. 2016, 40, e12506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cao, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Yu, Z.; Battino, M.; El-Seedi, H.; Guan, X. Mechanistic insights into the changes of enzyme activity in food processing under microwave irradiation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 2465–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, M.; Zhou, C.; Wang, B.; Zeng, S.; Mu, R.; Li, G.; Li, B.; Lv, W. Research progress and application of ultrasonic- and microwave-assisted food processing technology. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 3707–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Okonkwo, C.E.; Chen, L.; Zhou, C. Multimode ultrasonic-assisted decontamination of fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Chem. 2024, 450, 139356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bei, X.; Yu, X.; Li, D.; Sun, Q.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Okonkwo, C.E.; Zhou, C. Heat source replacement strategy using catalytic infrared: A future for energy saving drying of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. 2023, 88, 4827–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, X.; Zhou, C.; Yagoub, A.E.A.; Li, D. A Catalytic Infrared System as a Hot Water Replacement Strategy: A Future Approach for Blanching Fruits and Vegetables to Save Energy and Water. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 40, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wu, B.; Ma, Y.; Guo, X.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, C.; Gao, K.; Ma, H.; Pan, Z. Catalytic infrared blanching and drying of carrot slices with different thicknesses: Effects on surface dynamic crusting and quality characterization. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 88, 103444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, T.; Khir, R.; Pan, Z.; Yuan, Q. Simultaneous rough rice drying and rice bran stabilization using infrared radiation heating. LWT 2017, 78, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dhingra, D.; Chopra, S.; Rai, D.R. Stabilization of Raw Rice Bran using Ohmic Heating. Agric. Res. 2012, 1, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Roobab, U.; Khan, A.W.; Irfan, M.; Madni, G.M.; Zeng, X.A.; Nawaz, A.; Walayat, N.; Manzoor, M.F.; Aadil, R.M. Recent developments in ohmic technology for clean label fruit and vegetable processing: An overview. J. Food Process Eng. 2022, 45, e14045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xiong, Z.; Shi, T.; Jin, W.; Bao, Y.; Monto, A.R.; Yuan, L.; Gao, R. Gel performance of surimi induced by various thermal technologies: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 64, 3075–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bárdos, L.; Baránková, H. Cold atmospheric plasma: Sources, processes, and applications. Thin Solid Films 2010, 518, 6705–6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Umair, M.; Sultana, T.; Xun, S.; Jabbar, S.; Riaz Rajoka, M.S.; Albahi, A.; Abid, M.; Ranjha, M.M.A.N.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Xie, F.; et al. Advances in the application of functional nanomaterial and cold plasma for the fresh-keeping active packaging of meat. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 5753–5772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jia, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Shi, Q.; Shi, L. Irradiation role on meat quality induced dynamic molecular transformation: From nutrition to texture. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 39, 4442–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mir, S.A.; Dar, B.N.; Mir, M.M.; Sofi, S.A.; Shah, M.A.; Sidiq, T.; Sunooj, K.V.; Hamdani, A.M.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A. Current strategies for the reduction of pesticide residues in food products. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 106, 104274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tchabo, W.; Ma, Y.; Kwaw, E.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Afoakwah, N.A. Effects of Ultrasound, High Pressure, and Manosonication Processes on Phenolic Profile and Antioxidant Properties of a Sulfur Dioxide-Free Mulberry (Morus nigra) Wine. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1210–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Zhen, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, T.; Cao, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Ultra-High Hydrostatic Pressure Pretreatment on White Que Zui Tea: Chemical Constituents, Antioxidant, Cytoprotective, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Foods 2023, 12, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wei, B.; Cai, C.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z.; Tian, Y. Disruption and molecule degradation of waxy maize starch granules during high pressure homogenization process. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yu, C.w.; Hu, Q.r.; Wang, H.w.; Deng, Z.y. Comparison of 11 rice bran stabilization methods by analyzing lipase activities. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pankaj, S.K.; Keener, K.M. Cold plasma: Background, applications and current trends. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 16, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Feasibility of cold plasma for the control of biofilms in food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, C.; Li, M.; Wang, J.; Zhou, X.; Guo, Q.; Yan, J.; Li, Y. Plasma methods for preparing green catalysts: Current status and perspective. Chin. J. Catal. 2016, 37, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kumar, A.; Škoro, N.; Gernjak, W.; Puač, N. Cold atmospheric plasma technology for removal of organic micropollutants from wastewater—A review. Eur. Phys. J. D 2021, 75, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cui, H.; Bai, M.; Yuan, L.; Surendhiran, D.; Lin, L. Sequential effect of phages and cold nitrogen plasma against Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilms on different vegetables. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 268, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Cui, H. Inhibitory effect of cold nitrogen plasma on Salmonella Typhimurium biofilm and its application on poultry egg preservation. LWT 2020, 126, 109340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Siva, S.; Cui, H. Cold nitrogen plasma modified cuminaldehyde/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex and its application in vegetable juices preservation. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Aalim, H.; Cao, Y.; Peng, L.; Dou, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhai, X.; Guo, Z.; Cai, J.; et al. Cold plasma-assisted pretreatment for fabrication and characterization of rice starch-stearic acid complexes. Food Biosci. 2024, 60, 104492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhou, C.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Ji, F.; Wu, J.; Yu, H.; Liu, T.; Yang, W.; Liu, S.; et al. Impact of argon dielectric barrier discharge cold plasma on the physicochemical and cooking properties of lightly-milled rice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 92, 103580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, B.; Peng, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Dou, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, C. Insights into Cold Plasma Treatment on the Cereal and Legume Proteins Modification: Principle, Mechanism, and Application. Foods 2024, 13, 1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shen, C.; Chen, W.; Aziz, T.; Khojah, E.; Al-Asmari, F.; Alamri, A.S.; Alhomrani, M.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Drying kinetics and moisture migration mechanism of yam slices by cold plasma pretreatment combined with far-infrared drying. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 95, 103730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yang, X.; Ma, L.; Zheng, J.; Qiao, Y.; Bai, J.; Cai, J. Effects of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on the quality and cellulose modification of brown rice. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 96, 103744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, M.; Wang, X.; Shi, T.; Xiong, Z.; Jin, W.; Bao, Y.; Monto, A.R.; Yuan, L.; Gao, R. Mechanism of plasma-activated water promoting the heat-induced aggregation of myofibrillar protein from silver carp (Aristichthys Nobilis). Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 91, 103555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wei, W.; Yang, S.; Yang, F.; Hu, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, W.; Yang, B.; Xiao, X.; Zhu, L. Cold Plasma Controls Nitrite Hazards by Modulating Microbial Communities in Pickled Radish. Foods 2023, 12, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Qin, X.; Wang, Z.; Zou, Y.; Wang, D.; Xu, W. Restructured ground chicken quality study by ultrasound combined with plasma protein treatment. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Luo, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H.; Li, P. Effects of in-package atmospheric cold plasma treatment on the qualitative, metabolic and microbial stability of fresh-cut pears. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 4473–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Cui, H.; Ma, C.; Lin, L. Synergetic antibacterial efficacy of cold nitrogen plasma and clove oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilms on lettuce. Food Control 2016, 66, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tolouie, H.; Mohammadifar, M.A.; Ghomi, H.; Hashemi, M. Argon and nitrogen cold plasma effects on wheat germ lipolytic enzymes: Comparison to thermal treatment. Food Chem. 2021, 346, 128974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Saberi, M.; Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M.; Zare, R.; Ghomi, H. Amelioration of Photosynthesis and Quality of Wheat under Non-thermal Radio Frequency Plasma Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Los, A.; Ziuzina, D.; Akkermans, S.; Boehm, D.; Cullen, P.J.; Van Impe, J.; Bourke, P. Improving microbiological safety and quality characteristics of wheat and barley by high voltage atmospheric cold plasma closed processing. Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Cui, H.; Lin, L. Plasma enhanced-nutmeg essential oil solid liposome treatment on the gelling and storage properties of pork meat batters. J. Food Eng. 2020, 266, 109696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bai, J.-W.; Li, D.-D.; Abulaiti, R.; Wang, M.; Wu, X.; Feng, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Cai, J. Cold Plasma as a Novel Pretreatment to Improve the Drying Kinetics and Quality of Green Peas. Foods 2025, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Coutinho, N.M.; Silveira, M.R.; Guimarães, J.T.; Fernandes, L.M.; Pimentel, T.C.; Silva, M.C.; Borges, F.O.; Fernandes, F.A.N.; Rodrigues, S.; Freitas, M.Q.; et al. Are consumers willing to pay for a product processed by emerging technologies? The case of chocolate milk drink processed by cold plasma. LWT 2021, 138, 110772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lung, H.-M.; Cheng, Y.-C.; Chang, Y.-H.; Huang, H.-W.; Yang, B.B.; Wang, C.-Y. Microbial decontamination of food by electron beam irradiation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 44, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Li, T.; Wang, L.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Sun, D. Structural changes and enzymatic hydrolysis yield of rice bran fiber under electron beam irradiation. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 122, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Pan, L.; Xing, J.; Zhang, H.; Luo, X.; Chen, Z. Electron beam irradiation as a tool for rice grain storage and its effects on the physicochemical properties of rice starch. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2915–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Luo, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Xing, J.; Li, K.; Yang, M.; Wang, R.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z. Effects of electron beam irradiation on storability of brown and milled rice. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 81, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Hashemi Moosavi, M.; Oliveira, C.A.F.; Vanin, F.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Electron beam irradiation to reduce the mycotoxin and microbial contaminations of cereal-based products: An overview. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 143, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, C.; He, G.; Meng, J.; Wang, S.; Kong, Y.; Jiang, J.; Hu, R.; Zhou, G. Improved lignocellulose saccharification of a Miscanthus reddish stem mutant induced by heavy-ion irradiation. GCB Bioenergy 2020, 12, 1066–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, B.; Mahoney, N.E.; Khir, R.; Wu, B.; Zhou, C.; Pan, Z.; Ma, H. Degradation kinetics of aflatoxin B1 and B2 in solid medium by using pulsed light irradiation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 5220–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Xu, B.; Ren, A.; Chen, J.; Li, H.; Wei, B.; Wang, J.; Azam, S.M.R.; Bhandari, B.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H. Effect of multi-mode dual-frequency ultrasound irradiation on the degradation of waxy corn starch in a gelatinized state. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 113, 106440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mohammadi Shad, Z.; Steen, E.; Devlieghere, F.; Mauromoustakos, A.; Atungulu, G.G. Biochemical changes associated with electron beam irradiation of rice and links to kernel discoloration during storage. Cereal Chem. 2019, 96, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, R.; Yang, S.; Wang, D.; Liang, J.; Huang, T.; Zhang, L.; Luo, A. Electron-beam irradiation delayed the postharvest senescence of kiwifruit during cold storage through regulating the reactive oxygen species metabolism. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 189, 109717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Aganovic, K.; Hertel, C.; Vogel, R.F.; Johne, R.; Schlüter, O.; Schwarzenbolz, U.; Jäger, H.; Holzhauser, T.; Bergmair, J.; Roth, A.; et al. Aspects of high hydrostatic pressure food processing: Perspectives on technology and food safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 3225–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Grau-Fuentes, E.; Garzón, R.; Rodrigo, D.; Rosell, C.M. High pressure processing at different hydration levels as a tool to enhance rice bran stability and techno-functionality. Food Res. Int. 2025, 201, 115593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Engmann, F.; Ma, Y.-K.; Sanful, R. The impact of high hydrostatic pressure treatment on anthocyanins, colour, microorganisms, and enzyme activity of mulberry (Morus nigra) juice. Int. Food Res. J. 2020, 27, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  148. Geng, N.; Song, J.; Zhang, K.; Dai, Z.; Li, D. Effect of dynamic high-pressure microfluidization on the physicochemical and structural properties of insoluble dietary fiber from fresh corn bract. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wang, H.; Zhu, S.; Ramaswamy, H.S.; Hu, F.; Yu, Y. Effect of high pressure processing on rancidity of brown rice during storage. LWT 2018, 93, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, Z.; Ma, J.; Li, P.; Wen, B.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Huang, W. Preparation of hypoglycemic anthocyanins from mulberry (Fructus mori) fruits by ultrahigh pressure extraction. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023, 84, 103255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ye, S.-J.; Baik, M.-Y. Physicochemical properties of amorphous granular starch (AGS) prepared by non-thermal gelatinization by high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and spray drying. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Laokuldilok, T.; Rattanathanan, Y. Protease Treatment for the Stabilization of Rice Bran: Effects on Lipase Activity, Antioxidants, and Lipid Stability. Cereal Chem. 2014, 91, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sharma, A.; Gupta, G.; Ahmad, T.; Mansoor, S.; Kaur, B. Enzyme Engineering: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Food Rev. Int. 2019, 37, 121–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. He, R.; Xing, H.; Wang, Z.; Ding, W.; Zhu, P.; Liu, B.; Ma, H. Establishment of an Enzymatic Membrane Reactor for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Preparation from Wheat Germ Protein Isolates. J. Food Process Eng. 2015, 39, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wang, F.; Xu, H.; Wang, M.; Yu, X.; Cui, Y.; Xu, L.; Ma, A.; Ding, Z.; Huo, S.; Zou, B.; et al. Application of Immobilized Enzymes in Juice Clarification. Foods 2023, 12, 4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Maghraby, Y.R.; El-Shabasy, R.M.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Azzazy, H.M.E.-S. Enzyme immobilization technologies and industrial applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 5184–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Qu, W.; Sehemu, R.M.; Zhang, T.; Song, B.; Yang, L.; Ren, X.; Ma, H. Immobilized enzymolysis of corn gluten meal under triple-frequency ultrasound. Int. J. Food Eng. 2018, 14, 20170347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Shouket, S.; khurshid, S.; Khan, J.; Batool, R.; Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Alhomrani, M.; Alamri, A.S.; Sameeh, M.Y.; Zubair Filimban, F. Enhancement of shelf-life of food items via immobilized enzyme nanoparticles on varied supports. A sustainable approach towards food safety and sustainability. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Yu, D.; Chen, K.; Liu, J.; Pan, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, L.; Elfalleh, W. Application of magnetic immobilized papain on passivated rice bran lipase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 157, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhang, Y.; Feng, T.; Ni, X.; Xia, J.; Suo, H.; Yan, L.; Zou, B. Immobilized lipase based on SBA-15 adsorption and gel embedding for catalytic synthesis of isoamyl acetate. Food Biosci. 2024, 60, 104427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Han, J.; Feng, H.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Luo, P.; Wang, Y. Construction of Multienzyme Co-immobilized Hybrid Nanoflowers for an Efficient Conversion of Cellulose into Glucose in a Cascade Reaction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 7910–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Khan, M.R. Immobilized enzymes: A comprehensive review. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2021, 45, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. DiCosimo, R.; McAuliffe, J.; Poulose, A.J.; Bohlmann, G. Industrial use of immobilized enzymes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6437–6474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Douaisi, M.; Paskaleva, E.E.; Fu, L.; Grover, N.; McManaman, C.L.; Varghese, S.; Brodfuehrer, P.R.; Gibson, J.M.; de Joode, I.; Xia, K.; et al. Synthesis of bioengineered heparin chemically and biologically similar to porcine-derived products and convertible to low MW heparin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2315586121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Khodadad Hosseini, E.; Derakhshi, P.; Rabbani, M.; Mooraki, N. Pollutant removal from dairy wastewater using live Azolla filiculoides in batch and continuous bioreactors. Water Environ. Res. 2021, 93, 2122–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Araujo, T.M.; Barga, M.C.; Della-Bianca, B.E.; Basso, T.O. Yeast immobilisation for brewery fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 2021, 127, 302–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zabed, H.M.; Qi, X. Fermentative Production of Ergothioneine by Exploring Novel Biosynthetic Pathway and Remodulating Precursor Synthesis Pathways. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 14264–14273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Xie, J.; Zhang, Y.; Simpson, B. Food enzymes immobilization: Novel carriers, techniques and applications. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022, 43, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, L.H.; Zeng, X.A.; Han, Z.; Brennan, C.S. Non-thermal technologies and its current and future application in the food industry: A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 54, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, Z.-H.; Huang, X.; Chen, J.; Qin, Y.; Gao, X. Recent research and prospects of non-thermal physical technologies in green and high-efficient extraction of natural pigments: A review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 92, 103593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Hertwig, C.; Meneses, N.; Mathys, A. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma and low energy electron beam as alternative nonthermal decontamination technologies for dry food surfaces: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lin, L.; Liao, X.; Cui, H. Cold plasma treated thyme essential oil/silk fibroin nanofibers against Salmonella Typhimurium in poultry meat. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 21, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Gao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Hou, J.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Investigation of the formation of furfural compounds in apple products treated with pasteurization and high pressure processing. Food Res. Int. 2024, 190, 114546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Fan, W.; Hu, Y.; Tu, Z. Magnetic field: A non-thermal technology in food processing. Food Control 2024, 166, 110692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Jang, W.Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Chang, J.H. Comparative Study of Enzymatic Lipolysis Using Nanofructosome-Coated CalB Lipase Encapsulated in Silica and Immobilized on Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 13319–13326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Yang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhou, C.; Adhikari, B.; Liu, J.; Xu, T.; Wang, B. Atmosphere-controlled high-voltage electrospray for improving conductivity, flexibility, and antibacterial properties of chitosan films. Food Res. Int. 2025, 200, 115450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhai, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, J.; Sobhy, R.; Khalifa, I.; Zou, X. Lemon-derived carbon quantum dots incorporated guar gum/sodium alginate films with enhanced the preservability for blanched asparagus active packaging. Food Res. Int. 2025, 202, 115736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Vant, J.W.; Sarkar, D.; Nguyen, J.; Baker, A.T.; Vermaas, J.V.; Singharoy, A. Exploring cryo-electron microscopy with molecular dynamics. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022, 50, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Sun, S.; Xu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, P.; Fang, Y. Encrypted information reading technology at the micro/nano scale based on surface plasma-driven reactions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 281, 121607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological Structure of Rice grain [24].
Figure 1. Morphological Structure of Rice grain [24].
Foods 14 01448 g001
Figure 2. Pathways depicting the hydrolysis and oxidative rancidity of rice bran [53].
Figure 2. Pathways depicting the hydrolysis and oxidative rancidity of rice bran [53].
Foods 14 01448 g002
Figure 3. (A) Structural transformation of lipases from a closed conformation to an open conformation [53]; (B) mechanism of lipase-catalysis [58].
Figure 3. (A) Structural transformation of lipases from a closed conformation to an open conformation [53]; (B) mechanism of lipase-catalysis [58].
Foods 14 01448 g003
Figure 4. Different configurations of cold plasma designs: (a) dielectric barrier discharge, (b) plasma jet, (c) corona discharge, and (d) glow discharge [121].
Figure 4. Different configurations of cold plasma designs: (a) dielectric barrier discharge, (b) plasma jet, (c) corona discharge, and (d) glow discharge [121].
Foods 14 01448 g004
Figure 5. Electron beam irradiation of cereal and cereal-based products [139,142].
Figure 5. Electron beam irradiation of cereal and cereal-based products [139,142].
Foods 14 01448 g005
Figure 6. SEM and TEM images of Fe3O4/P(GMA-EDGMA-St) (a,c) and magnetic immobilized papain (b,d) [159].
Figure 6. SEM and TEM images of Fe3O4/P(GMA-EDGMA-St) (a,c) and magnetic immobilized papain (b,d) [159].
Foods 14 01448 g006
Table 1. Nutritional composition of rice bran [31].
Table 1. Nutritional composition of rice bran [31].
ComponentAverage RangeComponentAverage Range
Crude fat (%)18–23γ-oryzanol (g/kg)0.5–5.5
Crude protein (%)11–16
Total dietary fiber (%)22–32Total Tocopherols (mg/kg)100–150
Vitamin B1 (Thiamin) (mg/kg)12–40α-T (mg/kg)50–130
Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) (mg/kg)1–4β-T (mg/kg)2–10
Vitamin B3 (Niacin) (mg/kg)300–800γ-T (mg/kg)10–50
Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic acid) (mg/kg)74δ-T (mg/kg)0–2
Vitamin B6 (mg/kg)20–40
Ca (mg/kg)300–1200Total Tocotrienols (mg/kg)130–170
K (mg/kg)5992α-T3 (mg/kg)38
Fe (mg/kg)86–430β-T3 (mg/kg)
Zn (mg/kg)50–250γ-T3 (mg/kg)120–140
P (mg/kg)6278δ-T3 (mg/kg)0–10
Table 2. Research on Thermal Stabilization Methods for Rice Bran.
Table 2. Research on Thermal Stabilization Methods for Rice Bran.
MethodPrincipleAdvantagesLimitationsRef
Dry heatdirect heating at ~120 °C to inactivate enzymessimple and practical for commercial use;
cost-effective and easy to scale
uneven heating;
temperatures <100 °C ineffective; excessive heat degrades nutrients.
[84,85,86]
Moist heatindirect heating using high-pressure/ambient steambetter preservation of nutrients compared to dry heat;
more uniform heat distribution
requires precise moisture control;
higher energy consumption
[87,88,89]
Extrusionmechanical extrusion with steam injection induces structural changes and enzyme denaturationrapid and continuous processing;
stabilizes bran while improving texture
high energy consumption;
expensive machinery
[90,91,92]
Microwavedielectric heating via microwave absorption generates bulk heating, and synchronizing heatfast and energy-efficient;
minimal nutrient loss;
requires precise control of temperature to avoid over-heating;
high initial equipment cost
[93,94,95,96]
Infraredshort-wavelength radiation minimizes thermal inertia and damage while suppressing enzymes activitiesfast and energy-efficient;
uniform heat distribution
limited material penetration depth;
potential uneven heating in bulk processing
[22,97,98,99,100]
Ohmic HeatingJoule heating via electrical resistance converts current to thermal energyrapid and uniform heating;
minimal nutrient loss.
high equipment complexity;
limited scalability for industrial use
[101,102,103]
Table 3. Non-Thermal Stabilization Methods for Rice Bran.
Table 3. Non-Thermal Stabilization Methods for Rice Bran.
MethodPrincipleAdvantagesLimitationsRef
Low-temperature PlasmaReactive species (ROS/RNS) disrupt enzyme structureRapid, nutrient retentionLimited penetration depth[104,105]
HEEB IrradiationIonizing radiation generates free radicals to crosslink DNA/enzymesScalable, no chemical residuesPolymer degradation at high doses[106,107]
Ultra-High PressureHydrostatic pressure disrupts hydrophobic/ionic bondsPreserves thermosensi-tive compoundsHigh equipment cost[108,109,110]
Enzymatic StabilizationProteolytic degradation of enzymes using im-mobilized enzymesTargeted action, recyclable catalystsRequires optimization of E:S ratios[16,111]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, L.; Huang, J.; Du, Y.; Li, F.; Xu, W.; Zhou, C.; Liu, S. Non-Thermal Stabilization Strategies for Rice Bran: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances, and Implications for Industrial Applications. Foods 2025, 14, 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091448

AMA Style

Zhou L, Huang J, Du Y, Li F, Xu W, Zhou C, Liu S. Non-Thermal Stabilization Strategies for Rice Bran: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances, and Implications for Industrial Applications. Foods. 2025; 14(9):1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Lu, Jiangqi Huang, Yutong Du, Fanghao Li, Wenbin Xu, Chenguang Zhou, and Siyao Liu. 2025. "Non-Thermal Stabilization Strategies for Rice Bran: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances, and Implications for Industrial Applications" Foods 14, no. 9: 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091448

APA Style

Zhou, L., Huang, J., Du, Y., Li, F., Xu, W., Zhou, C., & Liu, S. (2025). Non-Thermal Stabilization Strategies for Rice Bran: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances, and Implications for Industrial Applications. Foods, 14(9), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop