Next Article in Journal
An In Silico Analysis of Synthetic and Natural Compounds as Inhibitors of Nitrous Oxide Reductase (N2OR) and Nitrite Reductase (NIR)
Next Article in Special Issue
Thioredoxin 1 and Thioredoxin Reductase 1 Redox System Is Dysregulated in Neutrophils of Subjects with Autism: In Vitro Effects of Environmental Toxicant, Methylmercury
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on the Use of Metal Oxide-Based Nanocomposites for the Remediation of Organics-Contaminated Water via Photocatalysis: Fundamentals, Bibliometric Study and Recent Advances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Nanomaterials on Gut Microbiota
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Independent and Combined Associations of Blood Manganese, Cadmium and Lead Exposures with the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Adults

1
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
2
School of Public Health, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310013, China
3
School of Nursing, Yanbian University, Yanji 133000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2023, 11(8), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080659
Submission received: 23 June 2023 / Revised: 27 July 2023 / Accepted: 28 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxicity and Mechanisms of Occupational and Environmental Pollutants)

Abstract

:
Manganese (Mn), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) have toxic effects on the immune system. However, their independent and combined effects on immune-inflammation responses are unclear. In recent years, the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been developed as an integrated and novel inflammatory indicator. A retrospective cross-sectional study of 2174 adults ≥20 years old from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2016 was conducted. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the independent and combined associations of SII with blood Mn, Cd and Pb levels. As continuous variables, both blood Cd and Mn showed dose-dependent relationships with the SII before and after adjusting for all potential confounding factors. Metal concentrations were then converted into categorical variables. Compared with the adults in the lowest Cd or Mn tertile, those in the highest tertile had higher risks of elevated SII. Furthermore, co-exposure to Mn and Cd also showed a positive relationship with the SII after adjusting for all confounding factors. However, the single effect of Pb exposure and the joint effect of Pb and other metal exposures on the SII were not observed. This study provides important epidemiological evidence of the associations of SII with single and co-exposure effects of blood Mn, Cd, and Pb.

1. Introduction

Manganese (Mn), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) are typical metals that can harm public health globally. Pb and Cd are generally present in batteries, pigments, medications, and other artificially produced goods [1] and have negative impacts on the immune system [2,3]. Exposure to Cd alone can damage the immune system by affecting innate cells, which changes T-cell production and function [4]. Previous research demonstrated that the combination of Cd and Pb could trigger inflammatory responses by releasing free radicals and reducing antioxidant defenses, which could lead to cell necrosis and the release of intracellular inflammatory chemicals [5]. Furthermore, children’s erythrocyte CD44 and CD58 expression may be compromised by prolonged exposure to Pb alone [6]. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established safety guidelines for adults with blood Cd and Pb levels of 5 μg/L and 10 μg/L, respectively [7]. A systematic review of the literature proposed that Mn presented U-shaped exposure–response effects on health [8]. In a prior investigation, Mn was found to be essential for nutritional immunity at low concentrations [9], whereas too much Mn may raise the risk of immune toxicity in a variety of vertebrate species, including fish, mice and birds [10]. According to the results of previous animal studies, Mn can alter lymphocytes and other physiological variables as well as enhance susceptibility to infection on both the inner and exterior parts of the body [11,12,13,14]. The majority of research involving the effects of Mn on human health has focused on its neurologic impacts and found small neurologic abnormalities related to blood Mn levels [15]. Epidemiological research has linked high occupational exposure to Mn to a reduction in T-lymphocyte numbers, but only in adult men [16].
Several inflammatory biomarkers, such as neutrophil count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [17,18], monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) [19], and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) [19,20,21], have been utilized in previous studies to prognosis colorectal cancer and lung cancer [22,23]. These biomarkers, however, may not correctly indicate the inflammatory condition since they are only related to one or two types of immune-inflammatory cells. As a brand-new inflammatory biomarker that correlates with neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts [24], the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) can be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with cancer and coronary artery disease (CAD) [25,26,27]. Hence, SII was proposed to be treated as an accurate index to reflect inflammation status in humans [28].
Currently, most researchers have paid attention to the single effect of heavy metals on human health. Several studies explored the effects of co-exposure to Pb and Cd [29,30,31] and Pb and Mn [32,33] on human health. A few studies on animals revealed that rats exposed to Mn, Cd, and Pb at the same time were more likely to develop hypolipidemia [34]. However, no previous study specifically addressed the independent and combined effects of these three elements on SII. Therefore, we decided to examine the independent and combined associations of Mn, Cd and Pb with the SII in a nationally representative population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The data used in this study were collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2016. The NHANES is a cross-sectional survey to assess the health and nutritional status of the U.S. population. Data were obtained through interviews, physical investigations, and laboratory tests [35]. The NHANES is a well-known public database that provides publicly available data for researchers around the world. To date, the data from NHANES have been widely used in studies to explore the impact of environmental pollutants on human health. The findings from the NHANES can provide a reference for other population studies as well as research clues for toxicological studies, even though the NHANES is an American database. The NHANES was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Each participant voluntarily provided their written informed consent. More details about this study are documented on the official website (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/, accessed on 29 March 2023).
After completing SII results and blood-heavy metal tests, participants under 20 years old were excluded. People who lacked important study-relevant variables were eliminated. Finally, 2174 participants were included in the analysis. Figure 1 displays the flow chart for the inclusion and exclusion of the study participants.

2.2. Blood Mn, Cd and Pb Measurements

In the NHANES project, one-half of a sample from participants aged 12 years and older were selected to measure the levels of Pb, Cd and Mn. Whole blood samples were obtained and stored at −30 °C, and then measured by the National Center for Environmental Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Concentrations of Mn, Cd and Pb were detected in the whole blood samples using mass spectrometry after a simple dilution sample preparation step. More detailed information can be found in the laboratory manual [36]. The results of Mn, Cd and Pb were directly collected in this study.
The detection limits (LODs) for Pb, Cd and Mn were 0.07 µg/dL, 0.1 µg/L and 0.99 µg/L in NHANES 2015–2016, respectively. The concentrations in this study are in the same range as those reported in recent studies [7,31,37,38]. The concentrations of Mn, Cd and Pb below the LODs were substituted with the limit divided by 2 [7].

2.3. Peripheral Blood Cell Count Measurement

The platelet counts, neutrophil counts and lymphocyte counts in the blood samples were detected using a Coulter HMX Hematology Analyzer. The SII level was calculated following our previous paper (platelet count × neutrophil count/lymphocyte count) [24]. The LOD for SII was dependent on platelet count, which was 3.0 × 103 cells/µL.

2.4. Covariates

Several variables were regarded as potential confounding factors in the analysis, according to earlier studies [39], including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, educational levels, and annual family income and lifestyle factors (alcohol intake and exposure to smoking). BMI was expressed in kg/m2 and further classified into three groups (<25, 25–30, and ≥30 kg/m2) [38]. Alcohol intake (yes/no) was defined on the label as whether you had at least 12 alcoholic drinks/year. Exposure to smoking (yes/no) was classified according to serum cotinine level (0.015 ng/mL) [40,41,42].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS (version 24.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R (vision 4.0.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used to analyze the data. “MASS” and “ggplot2” packages were used in the R program. Differences in baseline characteristics were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test or the Kruskal–Wallis test. Spearman analysis was used to calculate the correlations of SII, age and BMI with the concentrations of blood Mn, Cd and Pb. Furthermore, the general linear model (GLM) was applied to assess regression coefficients (βs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between SII and blood concentrations of Mn, Cd, and Pb as well as co-exposure effects of three elements. The GLM is a common method used as a numerical solution of ordinary differential equations [43]. The value of SII was taken as the dependent variable and the metal concentration was taken as the independent variable. In the multivariate regression analysis, metals were also sorted into tertiles as categorical variables. The effects of metal co-exposure on SII were examined using a combined multiplicative variable (Mn*Cd) which was widely applied to explore the combined effect in previous studies [43,44,45,46,47]. Finally, three models were available for analysis: Crude mode, no modification; Model I, adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, and BMI; and Model II, adjusted for all variables in Model I plus additional adjustments for educational levels, annual family income, alcohol consumption, and exposure to smoking. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p value < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Population

The baseline demographic information about the concentrations of blood Mn, Cd and Pb is presented in Table 1. Blood Mn levels were higher in younger adults, females, other races, non-drinkers and those with higher SII levels. Blood Cd levels were higher in older adults, females, non-Hispanic black and other races, and those with middle school educational levels, lower annual household income, lower BMI, or exposure to smoking. Blood Pb levels were higher in older adults, males, non-Hispanic black and other races, drinkers, those exposed to smoking, and those with middle school educational levels and lower BMI.

3.2. Correlations between Continuous Variables and Blood Concentrations of Mn, Cd and Pb

The results of the correlation analysis are presented in Table 2. Blood Mn had a positive correlation with SII and BMI (r = 0.075 and 0.045, respectively), but a negative correlation with age (r = −0.144). The Cd concentration was positively associated with SII (r = 0.055) and age (r = 0.076) but negatively associated with BMI (r = −0.093). Additionally, there was a positive correlation between blood Pb concentration and age (r = 0.286) but there was a negative correlation between Pb and BMI. In contrast, the results showed no significant correlation between blood Pb and SII (r = 0.090 and p = 0.629).

3.3. Associations of SII with Mn, Cd and Pb

Table 3 presents the associations of SII with blood Mn, Cd and Pb levels using generalized linear analyses. The concentrations of Mn and Cd, as continuous variables, were positively correlated with the SII (all p < 0.05). We found that for every 1 unit increase in blood Mn, the estimated β values indicated an increase of 5.80 in SII (95% CI: 2.53–9.06 and p = 0.001). For blood Cd, the estimated β value for increased SII was 30.06 (95% CI: 7.00–53.12 and p = 0.011). After concentrations of Mn and Cd were converted into categorical variables, individuals whose blood concentrations of Mn were in the third tertile (>10.94 μg/L) had a significantly higher SII (β = 33.49, 95% CI: 4.31–66.66, and p = 0.026) than those whose blood concentrations of Mn were in the first tertile (<8.21 μg/L). A similar pattern was also observed in the relationship between blood Cd and SII. The SII value of individuals in the third Cd tertile (>0.42 μg /L) was significantly higher (β = 48.91, 95% CI: 16.20–81.64, and p = 0.003) than that of individuals in the first Cd tertile (<0.22 μg/L). The dose–response relationship of SII with blood Cd and Mn was then separately explored via the R software (Figure 2). In contrast, there was no significant linear association between blood Pb levels and the SII. When blood Pb was treated as a continuous variable, the estimated β value of SII was 6.63 (95% CI: −4.13–17.40 and p = 0.227). After we adjusted all confounding factors and converted blood Pb to a categorical value, the estimated β was −1.31 (95% CI: −37.63–35.00 and p = 0.943).

3.4. The Relationship of SII with Co-Exposure to Blood Mn and Cd

The potential interactions of Mn and Cd are listed in Table 4. There was a positive correlation of SII with co-exposure to blood Mn and Cd (as a continuous variable) (p < 0.05). After transforming the co-exposure value of Mn and Cd into a categorical variable, adults in the third tertile had a higher SII than those in the first tertile. The model of the dose–response relationship of co-exposure to Cd and Mn with SII is shown in Figure 3. However, no significant interactions between Pb and the other two metals were observed.

4. Discussion

People are generally exposed to multiple heavy metal elements rather than a single metal element in the real world [46]. The interactions between heavy metals can be additive, synergistic, antagonistic, or independent, and can produce different biochemical changes in different regions of the human body [7,29,37,46]. However, most research has focused on the health risks of single heavy metal exposure, with little focus on the health effects of interactions between multiple heavy metals. It is not possible to clarify the interactive effects of combined heavy metal exposure. Therefore, combined exposure to heavy metals is a key gap in the study of population health risks, and it is necessary to explore the health effects of combined exposure to heavy metals.
Mn exposure in the general population is mostly connected with daily nutrition and water intake [48] as well as occupational [49] and environmental exposure [50]. Cd enters the human body due to the factors mentioned above in addition to tobacco use [51]. There is mounting evidence that exposure to Mn, Cd, and Pb alone or in combination has harmful consequences on human health, including neuroinflammation, cognitive impairment, and behavioral problems [45,52]. In an animal study, Pankaj and colleagues found that an oral dose of Mn and Cd could cause inflammation in mice, which results in a faster onset of viral infection in the brain [53].
Heavy metal exposure can increase the risk of immune system disorders, according to numerous studies [54]. SII, which is composed of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets, is an immunological biomarker that is easily detected. The majority of white blood cells are neutrophils, which play an important role in triggering immunological responses and reducing chronic inflammation by producing neutrophil elastase [55]. Lymphocytes, which express more than 75% of the human genome, can control inflammation through the immune system [56]. The functions of platelets include activating innate and adaptive immune responses [57]. Therefore, the level of SII may reflect the inflammatory condition in the body [58]. High SII values are frequently accompanied by lymphopenia, neutropenia, or thrombocytosis [59]. According to our current findings, those with higher blood Mn and Cd levels as well as co-exposure to Mn and Cd had considerably higher SII levels. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we found that the SII showed positive linear relationships with blood Mn, Cd levels, and co-exposure to Mn and Cd. In addition, metal exposure has greatly improved. Since the levels of metal exposure within the range of reference values were still associated with the immune system, these results may support the hypothesis that there might be a new threshold of metals for the immune system in humans. It is considered necessary to continue to monitor and study environmental metal exposure.
Pb exposure occurs in humans from several sources, including soil, food, dust, and products used in manufacturing in daily life or at work [60]. In addition, there is a complicated link between immune system health and Pb exposure. Mishra et al. reported that blood Pb levels above 25 g/dL had detrimental effects on the individual’s immune system by lowering the quantity and proportion of CD3+ and CD4+ cells [61]. In contrast, Dou et al. reported that there was no significant correlation between Pb and T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, and other immune cells, as well as TH1/TH2/TH17 cytokines, while those exposed to high levels of Pb had higher percentages of CD3+ cells than those exposed to low levels of Pb [62]. However, in this study, we found that there were no linear relationships of SII with Pb exposure alone, co-exposure of Pb and Cd, and co-exposure of Pb and Mn as well as co-exposure of Pb, Mn, and Cd. A potential mechanism may be related to the effect of Pb on the immune system. A previous study showed that Pb exposure not only decreased lymphocyte numbers and suppressed the adaptive immune responses but also changed the innate immune response [63]. As a result, there was no linear relationship between Pb and SII. In the future, additional nonlinear studies on blood Pb and SII are needed. We did not observe the single effect of Pb exposure and the joint effect of Pb and other metal exposures on the SII, suggesting the limited effect of Pb levels observed in this study.
Our study had several strengths. First, only a few earlier investigations had examined the link between SII and exposure to heavy metals. This is the first study to demonstrate the effects of Mn, Cd, and their joint exposure on SII in humans. Second, a substantial connection of SII with blood Cd and Mn as well as co-exposure to Cd and Mn was supported by the large sample size. Additionally, this study accounted for potential confounding variables that might alter the relationship between blood element concentrations and SII using extensive covariate data.
However, there were some limitations to our study. First, the cross-sectional study design precluded us from drawing judgments about the cause. Instead, prospective studies are needed to fully understand how exposure to heavy metals affect the systemic immune-inflammatory condition. Furthermore, although we investigated the relationships between exposure to heavy metals and the SII, this study only explored one indicator of the immune system. More research is still necessary to ascertain the link between exposure to metals and additional immuno-inflammatory biomarkers, such as the NLR, PLR, and LMR. Furthermore, the data on neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts are generally easily lost in clinical practice, which could have added selection bias to the outcomes. Finally, nonlinear models must be used in future research to examine the relationships between blood Pb and SII.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we found that Mn, Cd and co-exposure to Mn and Cd could affect the systemic immune-inflammatory condition in humans. Our findings also showed that the immune-inflammatory response could be aggravated in a linear dose-dependent manner by Mn and Cd as well as co-exposure to Mn and Cd. However, neither blood Pb nor its co-exposure to other metals had a similar impact on the immune-inflammatory response. Further prospective research is still required to validate these findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Z. and J.L.; data curation, Q.Z. and W.S.; validation, Q.Z. and W.Z.; formal analysis, Q.Z. and Y.Q.; methodology, Q.Z. and X.L.; supervision, H.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Health and Safety of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2023CDCKL02), the Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (Y202249200), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ23H260007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board. No further ethical approval is required.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are publicly available on the NHANES website: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Index.htm (accessed on 10 March 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roth, J.A.; Salvi, R. Ototoxicity of Divalent Metals. Neurotox. Res. 2016, 30, 268–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ebrahimi, M.; Khalili, N.; Razi, S.; Keshavarz-Fathi, M.; Khalili, N.; Rezaei, N. Effects of lead and cadmium on the immune system and cancer progression. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Garcia-Leston, J.; Roma-Torres, J.; Mayan, O.; Schroecksnadel, S.; Fuchs, D.; Moreira, A.O.; Pasaro, E.; Mendez, J.; Teixeira, J.P.; Laffon, B. Assessment of immunotoxicity parameters in individuals occupationally exposed to lead. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2012, 75, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Holaskova, I.; Elliott, M.; Hanson, M.L.; Schafer, R.; Barnett, J.B. Prenatal cadmium exposure produces persistent changes to thymus and spleen cell phenotypic repertoire as well as the acquired immune response. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012, 265, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, H.; Yan, J.; Niu, J.; Wang, H.; Li, X. Association between lead and cadmium co-exposure and systemic immune inflammation in residents living near a mining and smelting area in NW China. Chemosphere 2022, 287 Pt 3, 132190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huo, X.; Dai, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Xu, X. Decreased erythrocyte CD44 and CD58 expression link e-waste Pb toxicity to changes in erythrocyte immunity in preschool children. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 690–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, H.; Mao, Y.; Xu, B.; Hu, Y. Low-level environmental lead and cadmium exposures and dyslipidemia in adults: Findings from the NHANES 2005–2016. J Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 63, 126651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Milton, B.; Krewski, D.; Mattison, D.R.; Karyakina, N.A.; Ramoju, S.; Shilnikova, N.; Birkett, N.; Farrell, P.J.; McGough, D. Modeling U-shaped dose-response curves for manganese using categorical regression. Neurotoxicology 2017, 58, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Zhou, D.; Dai, Z.; Li, X. Association Between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Diabetic Depression. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2021, 16, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, Q.; Mu, Q.; Xia, Z.; Min, J.; Wang, F. Manganese homeostasis at the host-pathogen interface and in the host immune system. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 115, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, X.; Gao, X.Q.; Wang, X.Y.; Fang, Y.Y.; Xu, L.; Zhao, K.F.; Huang, B.; Liu, B.L. Bioaccumulation of manganese and its effects on oxidative stress and immune response in juvenile groupers (Epinephelus moara female symbol x E. lanceolatus male symbol). Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, C.; Guan, Y.; Lv, M.; Zhang, R.; Guo, Z.; Wei, X.; Du, X.; Yang, J.; Li, T.; Wan, Y.; et al. Manganese Increases the Sensitivity of the cGAS-STING Pathway for Double-Stranded DNA and Is Required for the Host Defense against DNA Viruses. Immunity 2018, 48, 675–687.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Do, J.W.; Saravanan, M.; Nam, S.E.; Lim, H.J.; Rhee, J.S. Waterborne manganese modulates immunity, biochemical, and antioxidant parameters in the blood of red seabream and black rockfish. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2019, 88, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, X.F.; Li, Z.P.; Tie, F.; Liu, N.; Zhang, Z.W.; Xu, S.W. Effects of manganese-toxicity on immune-related organs of cocks. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 2085–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Martin, K.V.; Edmondson, D.; Cecil, K.M.; Bezi, C.; Vance, M.L.; McBride, D.; Haynes, E.N. Manganese Exposure and Neurologic Outcomes in Adult Populations. Neurol. Clin. 2020, 38, 913–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakata, A.; Araki, S.; Park, S.H.; Park, J.T.; Kim, D.S.; Park, H.C. Yokoyama. K, Decreases in CD8+ T, naive (CD4+CD45RA+) T, and B (CD19+) lymphocytes by exposure to manganese fume. Ind. Health 2006, 44, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Velasco, A.; Rodriguez-Revuelta, J.; Olie, E.; Abad, I.; Fernandez-Pelaez, A.; Cazals, A.; Guillaume, S.; de La Fuente-Tomas, L.; Jimenez-Trevino, L.; Gutierrez, L.; et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A potential new peripheral biomarker of suicidal behavior. Eur. Psychiatry 2020, 63, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sun, H.; Que, J.; Peng, Y.; Ye, H.; Xiang, H.; Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Ji, K. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: A promising predictor of mortality in coronary care unit patients-A cohort study. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 74, 105692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cananzi, F.C.M.; Minerva, E.M.; Sama, L.; Ruspi, L.; Sicoli, F.; Conti, L.; Fumagalli Romario, U.; Quagliuolo, V.L. Preoperative monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 119, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gasparyan, A.Y.; Ayvazyan, L.; Mukanova, U.; Yessirkepov, M.; Kitas, G.D. The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as an Inflammatory Marker in Rheumatic Diseases. Ann. Lab. Med. 2019, 39, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kumarasamy, C.; Tiwary, V.; Sunil, K.; Suresh, D.; Shetty, S.; Muthukaliannan, G.K.; Baxi, S.; Jayaraj, R. Prognostic Utility of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio in Head and Neck Cancers: A Detailed PRISMA Compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2021, 13, 4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Lin, Z.; Zeng, M.; Shi, P.; Cao, Y.; Chen, F. Compare the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of MLR, NLR and PLR in CRC Patients. Clin. Lab. 2021, 67, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mandaliya, H.; Jones, M.; Oldmeadow, C.; Nordman, I.I. Prognostic biomarkers in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI). Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2019, 8, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Y.L.; Wu, C.H.; Hsu, P.F.; Chen, S.C.; Huang, S.S.; Chan, W.L.; Lin, S.J.; Chou, C.Y.; Chen, J.W.; Pan, J.P.; et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) predicted clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 50, e13230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, J.H.; Zhai, E.T.; Yuan, Y.J.; Wu, K.M.; Xu, J.B.; Peng, J.J.; Chen, C.Q.; He, Y.L.; Cai, S.R. Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 6261–6272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, L. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Patients with Cervical Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Bittoni, A.; Pecci, F.; Mentrasti, G.; Crocetti, S.; Lupi, A.; Lanese, A.; Pellei, C.; Ciotti, C.; Cantini, L.; Giampieri, R.; et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index: A prognostic tiebreaker among all in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, X.; Long, Z.Q.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wen, W.; Guo, L.; Xia, W.; Zhang, W.W.; Lin, H.X. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Breast Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Study. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, X.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, H.; He, P.; Liu, Y.; Jin, T. The association between lead and cadmium co-exposure and renal dysfunction. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 173, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bartrem, C.; Tirima, S.; von Lindern, I.; von Braun, M.; Worrell, M.C.; Mohammad Anka, S.; Abdullahi, A.; Moller, G. Unknown risk: Co-exposure to lead and other heavy metals among children living in small-scale mining communities in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2014, 24, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pan, Z.; Guo, Y.; Xiang, H.; Hui, Y.; Ju, H.; Xu, S.; Li, L. Effects of Lead, Mercury, and Cadmium Co-exposure on Children’s Pulmonary Function. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2020, 194, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Martin, K.V.; Sucharew, H.; Dietrich, K.N.; Parsons, P.J.; Palmer, C.D.; Wright, R.; Amarasiriwardena, C.; Smith, D.R.; Haynes, E.N. Co-exposure to manganese and lead and pediatric neurocognition in East Liverpool, Ohio. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guan, R.; Wang, T.; Dong, X.; Du, K.; Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Xu, J.; Li, B.; Zheng, G.; Shen, X.; et al. Effects of co-exposure to lead and manganese on learning and memory deficits. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 121, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oladipo, O.O.; Ayo, J.O.; Ambali, S.F.; Mohammed, B.; Aluwong, T. Dyslipdemia induced by chronic low dose co-exposure to lead, cadmium and manganese in rats: The role of oxidative stress. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 53, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhong, Q.; Sun, W.; Qin, Y.; Xu, H. Association of Dietary α-Carotene and β-Carotene Intake with Low Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Nutrients 2023, 15, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cadmium, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, and Selenium Lab Procedure Manual. Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2015-2016/labmethods/PBCD_I_met.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2023).
  37. Gao, W.; Tong, L.; Zhao, S.; Sun, M.; Fang, J.; Xu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Jin, L. Exposure to Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, and Arsenic and Uric Acid Levels: Results from NHANES 2007–2016. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 1659–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM) Lead Toxicity. 2010. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/lead/docs/lead.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2023).
  39. Bulka, C.M.; Persky, V.W.; Daviglus, M.L.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.A.; Argos, M. Multiple metal exposures and metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014. Environ. Res. 2019, 168, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, H.; Bo, Y. Associations between pyrethroid exposure and serum sex steroid hormones in adults: Findings from a nationally representative sample. Chemosphere 2022, 300, 134591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rapp, J.L.; Alpert, N.; Flores, R.M.; Taioli, E. Serum cotinine levels and nicotine addiction potential of e-cigarettes: An NHANES analysis. Carcinogenesis 2020, 41, 1454–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Patel, M.A.; Mener, D.J.; Garcia-Esquinas, E.; Navas-Acien, A.; Agrawal, Y.; Lin, S.Y. Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Eustachian Tube Disorders in US Children and Adolescents. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Carvalho, C.F.; Rodrigues, J.L.G.; Araújo, C.F.S.; Dos Santos, N.R.; Lima, C.S.; Bandeira, M.J.; Marques, B.L.d.S.; Anjos, A.L.S.; Bah, H.A.F.; et al. Environmental Co-Exposure to Lead and Manganese and Intellectual Deficit in School-Aged Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bo, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wan, Z.; Zhao, X.; Yu, Z. Intakes of Folate, Vitamin B6, and Vitamin B12 in Relation to All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A National Population-Based Cohort. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sanders, A.P.; Claus Henn, B.; Wright, R.O. Perinatal and childhood exposure to cadmium, manganese, and metal mixtures and effects on cognition and behavior: A review of recent literature. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015, 2, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Dai, J.; Wu, X.; Bai, Y.; Feng, W.; Wang, S.; Chen, Z.; Fu, W.; Li, G.; Chen, W.; Wang, G.; et al. Effect of Thallium Exposure and Its Interaction with Smoking on Lung Function Decline: A Prospective Cohort Study. Environ. Int. 2019, 127, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Y.; Huo, X.; Xu, L.; Wei, X.; Wu, W.; Wu, X.; Xu, X. Hearing loss in children with e-waste lead and cadmium exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 624, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Palzes, V.A.; Sagiv, S.K.; Baker, J.M.; Rojas-Valverde, D.; Gutierrez-Vargas, R.; Winkler, M.S.; Fuhrimann, S.; Staudacher, P.; Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Reiss, A.L.; et al. Manganese exposure and working memory-related brain activity in smallholder farmworkers in Costa Rica: Results from a pilot study. Environ. Res. 2019, 173, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, D.; Ge, X.; Liu, Z.; Huang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, P.; Qin, L.; Lin, S.; Liu, C.; Hou, Q.; et al. Association between long-term occupational manganese exposure and bone quality among retired workers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Finley, J.W. Does Environmental Exposure to Manganese Pose a Health Risk to Healthy Adults? Nutr. Rev. 2004, 62, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jain, R.B. Concentrations of cadmium, lead, and mercury in blood among US cigarettes, cigars, electronic cigarettes, and dual cigarette-e-cigarette users. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 970–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bakulski, K.M.; Seo, Y.A.; Hickman, R.C.; Brandt, D.; Vadari, H.S.; Hu, H.; Park, S.K. Heavy Metals Exposure and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 76, 1215–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Seth, P.; Husain, M.M.; Gupta, P.; Schoneboom, B.A.; Grieder, F.B.; Mani, H.; Maheshwari, R.K. Early onset of virus infection and up-regulation of cytokines in mice treated with cadmium and manganese. BioMetals 2003, 16, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Brucker, N.; Moro, A.; Charao, M.; Bubols, G.; Nascimento, S.; Goethel, G.; Barth, A.; Prohmann, A.C.; Rocha, R.; Moresco, R.; et al. Relationship between blood metals and inflammation in taxi drivers. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 444, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Talukdar, S.; Oh, D.Y.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Li, D.; Xu, J.; McNelis, J.; Lu, M.; Li, P.; Yan, Q.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Neutrophils mediate insulin resistance in mice fed a high-fat diet through secreted elastase. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Gladkevich, A.; Nelemans, S.A.; Kauffman, H.F.; Korf, J. Microarray profiling of lymphocytes in internal diseases with an altered immune response: Potential and methodology. Mediat. Inflamm. 2005, 2005, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Semple, J.W.; Italiano, J.E., Jr.; Freedman, J. Platelets and the immune continuum. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lolli, C.; Caffo, O.; Scarpi, E.; Aieta, M.; Conteduca, V.; Maines, F.; Bianchi, E.; Massari, F.; Veccia, A.; Chiuri, V.E.; et al. Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts the Clinical Outcome in Patients with mCRPC Treated with Abiraterone. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Geng, Y.; Shao, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, W.; Ni, X.; Wu, C.; Jiang, J. Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Charkiewicz, A.E.; Backstrand, J.R. Lead Toxicity and Pollution in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mishra, K.P. Lead exposure and its impact on immune system: A review. Toxicol. Vitr. 2009, 23, 969–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dou, J.; Zhou, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, W.; Shen, H.; Zhang, F. Effects of long-term high-level lead exposure on the immune function of workers. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2022, 77, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, K.; Zeng, Z.; Tian, Q.; Huang, J.; Zhong, Q.; Huo, X. Epidemiological evidence for the effect of environmental heavy metal exposure on the immune system in children. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 868, 161691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart for selection of the study participants.
Figure 1. Flowchart for selection of the study participants.
Toxics 11 00659 g001
Figure 2. Dose–response relationship of SII with concentrations of blood Mn and Cd. (a) Association of SII with blood Mn; (b) association of SII with blood Cd. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Figure 2. Dose–response relationship of SII with concentrations of blood Mn and Cd. (a) Association of SII with blood Mn; (b) association of SII with blood Cd. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Toxics 11 00659 g002
Figure 3. SII associated with co-exposure to Mn and Cd. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education level, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Figure 3. SII associated with co-exposure to Mn and Cd. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education level, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Toxics 11 00659 g003
Table 1. The distribution of blood Mn, Cd and Pb concentrations according to baseline characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. The distribution of blood Mn, Cd and Pb concentrations according to baseline characteristics of the study participants.
CharactersParticipants
[n (%)]
Blood Mn (μg/L)p ValueBlood Cd (μg/L)p ValueBlood Pb (μg/dL)p Value
Age
20–491065 (49.0)9.84 (7.92, 12.53)<0.0010.25 (0.16, 0.44)<0.0010.68 (0.47, 1.11)<0.001
49–65618 (28.4)9.21 (7.55, 11.60)0.33 (0.20, 0.65)1.18 (0.82, 1.82)
>65491 (22.6)8.85 (7.01, 10.80)0.35 (0.24, 0.56)1.43 (0.94, 2.14)
Sex
Male1065 (49.0)8.77 (7.18, 13.52)<0.0010.27 (0.17, 0.49)<0.0011.15 (0.72, 1.84)<0.001
Female1109 (51.0)10.03 (8.17, 12.72)0.33 (0.21, 0.55)0.81 (0.52, 1.33)
Race/ethnicity
Mexican American662 (30.5)9.93 (7.92, 12.54)<0.0010.26 (0.18, 0.42)<0.0010.89 (0.57, 1.41)<0.001
Non-Hispanic white778 (35.8)9.03 (7.51, 11.30)0.29 (0.17, 0.54)0.96 (0.58, 1.66)
Non-Hispanic black424 (19.5)8.36 (6.76, 12.39)0.34 (0.20, 0.66)1.01 (0.60, 1.68)
Others310 (14.3)11.24 (9.00, 14.33)0.36 (0.24, 0.62)1.11 (0.69, 1.65)
Education levels
No and elementary school253 (11.6)9.98 (7.73, 12.27)0.1360.30 (0.20, 0.56)<0.0011.16 (0.74, 1.92)<0.001
Middle school236 (10.9)9.66 (7.86, 11.77)0.40 (0.24, 0.71)1.20 (0.76, 1.88)
High school483 (22.2)9.22 (7.34, 11.75)0.34 (0.21, 0.66)0.34 (0.58, 1.65)
College or over1201 (55.3)9.34 (7.63, 11.84)0.27 (0.17, 0.44)0.27 (0.56, 1.42)
Annual house income
<20,0002059 (94.7)9.41 (7.83, 11.63)0.7260.30 (0.18, 0.53)0.0180.95 (0.42, 1.56)0.183
>20,000115 (5.3)9.43 (7.55, 12.91)0.26 (0.17, 0.38)1.08 (0.63, 1.70)
BMI
<25578 (26.6)9.43 (7.71, 11.97)0.0240.35 (0.19, 0.66)<0.0011.07 (0.64, 1.76)<0.001
25–30701 (32.2)9.21 (7.30, 11.60)0.29 (0.19, 0.50)1.09 (0.69, 1.72)
≥30895 (41.2)9.53 (7.85, 11.07)0.27 (0.18, 0.47)0.83 (0.54, 1.33)
Alcohol intake
Yes15,264 (70.1)9.19 (7.52, 11.64)<0.0010.30 (0.18, 0.54)0.2601.01 (0.62, 1.64)<0.001
No650 (29.9)9.96 (7.90, 11.47)0.29 (0.18, 0.49)0.87 (0.56, 1.45)
Exposure to smoking
Yes1394 (64.1)9.31 (7.60, 11.75)0.1760.34 (0.20, 0.67)<0.0011.04 (0.62, 1.69)<0.001
No780 (35.9)9.57 (7.71, 12.02)0.25 (0.17, 0.37)0.87 (0.57, 1.40)
SII
<357.52724 (33.3)9.14 (7.31, 11.58)<0.0010.29 (0.18, 0.48)0.2641.01 (0.62, 1.55)0.556
357.52–554.91726 (33.4)9.41 (7.62, 11.63)0.29 (0.19, 0.51)0.95 (0.59, 1.51)
>554.91724 (33.3)9.71 (7.87, 12.46)0.30 (0.19, 0.57)0.92 (0.58, 1.62)
Note: Data were presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Table 2. Spearman correlations of Mn, Cd and Pb with SII, age and BMI.
Table 2. Spearman correlations of Mn, Cd and Pb with SII, age and BMI.
VariablesMnp ValueCdp ValuePbp Value
SII0.0750.001 **0.0550.011 *0.0900.629
Age−0.144<0.001 ***0.076<0.001 ***0.286<0.001 ***
BMI0.0450.037 *−0.093<0.001 ***−0.137<0.001 ***
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index.
Table 3. Association of SII with blood Mn, Cd and Pb levels in the study population.
Table 3. Association of SII with blood Mn, Cd and Pb levels in the study population.
Variablesβ (95% CI), p Values for SII
Crude ModelMode I aModel Ⅱ b
Blood Mn (μg/L)
Continuous c5.80 (2.53, 9.06)
0.001
5.65 (2.33, 8.97)
0.001
5.96 (2.62, 9.29)
<0.001
T1 (<8.21)0 [Reference]0 [Reference]0 [Reference]
T2 (8.21–10.94)−7.45 (−37.85, 22.96)
0.631
−11.42 (−41.85, 19.00)
0.462
−10.13 (−40.56, 20.31)
0.514
T3 (>10.94)36.57 (5.95, 67.18)
0.019
32.67 (1.64, 63.70)
0.039
33.49 (4.31, 66.66)
0.026
p value for trend0.0210.0400.027
Blood Cd (μg/L)
Continuous c30.06 (7.00, 53.12)
0.011
39.88 (16.74,63.03)
0.001
42.10 (18.05, 66.14)
0.001
T1 (<0.22)0 [Reference]0 [Reference]0 [Reference]
T2 (0.22–0.42)14.20 (−16.49, 44.90)
0.364
14.32 (−16.73, 45.34)
0.336
15.20 (−16.00, 46.40)
0.340
T3 (>0.42)30.80 (0.57,61.03)
0.046
45.16 (13.78,76.55)
0.005
48.91 (16.20,81.64)
0.003
p value for trend0.0060.0050.004
Blood Pb (μg/dL)
Continuous c2.02 (−7.99, 12.03)
0.692
6.42 (−74.20, 17.04)
0.236
6.63 (−4.13, 17.40)
0.227
T1 (<0.71)0 [Reference]0 [Reference]0 [Reference]
T2 (0.71–1.33)−20.93 (−51.47, 9.61)
0.179
−16.64 (−48.91, 15.63)
0.312
−17.93 (−50.93, 14.52)
0.279
T3 (>1.33)−13.76 (−44.46, 16.94)
0.380
0.62 (−34.94, 36.17)
0.973
−1.31 (−37.63, 35.00)
0.943
p value for trend0.3780.9360.979
a Model I was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity and BMI. b Model Ⅱ was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. c SII was a continuous variable.
Table 4. Significant associations of SII with co-exposure to Mn and Cd in the study population.
Table 4. Significant associations of SII with co-exposure to Mn and Cd in the study population.
Variablesβ (95% CI), p Values for SII
Crude ModelModel I aModel Ⅱ b
Mn*Cd
Continuous c2.76 (0.86, 4.66)
0.004
3.59 (1.58, 5.39)
<0.001
3.66 (1.69, 5.60)
<0.001
T1 (<2.00)0 [Reference]0 [Reference]0 [Reference]
T2 (2.00–4.24)21.70 (−8.88, 52.28)
0.164
20.77 (−9.83, 51.37)
0.183
22.22 (−8.58, 53.02)
0.157
T3 (>4.24)47.85 (17.29, 78.41)
0.002
53.34 (27.08, 89.60)
<0.001
62.57 (30.31, 94.82)
<0.001
p value for trend0.002<0.001<0.001
a Model Ⅰ was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity and BMI. b Model Ⅱ was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, education, annual family income, alcohol intake and exposure to smoking. c SII was a continuous variable.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, Q.; Zhou, W.; Lin, J.; Sun, W.; Qin, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, H. Independent and Combined Associations of Blood Manganese, Cadmium and Lead Exposures with the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Adults. Toxics 2023, 11, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080659

AMA Style

Zhong Q, Zhou W, Lin J, Sun W, Qin Y, Li X, Xu H. Independent and Combined Associations of Blood Manganese, Cadmium and Lead Exposures with the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Adults. Toxics. 2023; 11(8):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Qiya, Wenxin Zhou, Jiaqi Lin, Wen Sun, Yao Qin, Xiang Li, and Huadong Xu. 2023. "Independent and Combined Associations of Blood Manganese, Cadmium and Lead Exposures with the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Adults" Toxics 11, no. 8: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11080659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop