Next Article in Journal
Genomic Analysis of Lymphoma Risk in Bullmastiff Dogs
Next Article in Special Issue
Plasma Concentrations of Oral Ondansetron in Hospitalized Dogs Exhibiting Clinical Signs of Nausea
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Review and Metanalysis on the Use of Hermetia illucens and Tenebrio molitor in Diets for Poultry
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Pharmacokinetic and Absolute Bioavailability of Cyclosporine (Atopica for Cats®) in Cats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Profile of Essential Oils of Selected Lamiaceae Plants and In Vitro Activity for Varroosis Control in Honeybees (Apis mellifera)

1
Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
2
Mediterranean Ethnobotanical Conservatory, 88054 Catanzaro, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Cosenza, Italy
4
Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70125 Bari, Italy
5
Department of Health Sciences, Institute of Research for Food Safety & Health (IRC-FISH), University of Catanzaro Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
6
Nutramed S.c.a.r.l., Complesso Ninì Barbieri, 88021 Catanzaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(12), 701; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120701
Submission received: 7 November 2023 / Revised: 5 December 2023 / Accepted: 8 December 2023 / Published: 13 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Animal Clinical Treatment)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Varroa destructor acariasis is currently the main threat to the health and survival of honeybee colonies. Chemicals are often used to control this parasitosis. However, overuse and misuse over the years has allowed the mite to acquire resistance to synthetic active ingredients. In this scenario, it is vital to search for alternative therapeutic solutions. Essential oils (EOs) are a promising therapeutic choice, as they have a complex chemical composition, making them unlikely to be prone to the development of resistance. In addition, they are easily degraded in the environment and have a low toxicity for humans, characteristics that make them particularly attractive. In this research study, four EOs from the Lamiaceae family, isolated from botanical species native to the Calabria region, Southern Italy, were tested in contact toxicity tests against V. destructor. Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum, Thymus capitatus and Thymus longicaulis, used at 2 mg/mL, were found to have a high level of efficacy, neutralizing (dead + inactivated) 94%, 92% and 94% of parasites, respectively. These EOs could be chosen and tested in subsequent in vivo studies.

Abstract

The most significant ectoparasitic mite of honeybees, Varroa destructor, has a detrimental effect on bee health and honey output. The principal strategy used by the control programs is the application of synthetic acaricides. All of this has resulted in drug resistance, which is now a major worry for beekeeping. As a result, research on alternate products and techniques for mite management is now required. The aim of this study was to determine whether essential oils (EOs) extracted from botanical species of Lamiacae, typical of the Calabria region of Southern Italy, could reduce the population of the mite V. destructor. Among the best-known genera of the Lamiaceae family are oregano, rosemary and thyme, whose EOs were employed in this study. By steam distillation, the EOs were extracted from Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link, Thymus longicaulis C.Presl and Salvia rosmarinus Schleid. plant species harvested directly on the Calabrian territory in their balsamic time. Each EO went to the test in vitro (contact toxicity) against V. destructor. Fifty adult female mites, five for each EO and the positive and negative control, were used in each experimental replicate. The positive controls comprised five individuals treated to Amitraz dilute in acetone, and the negative controls included five individuals exposed to acetone alone. To create the working solution to be tested (50 μL/tube), the EOs were diluted (0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL and 4 mg/mL) in HPLC-grade acetone. After 1 h of exposure, mite mortality was manually assessed. Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum, Thymus capitatus and Thymus longicaulis were the EOs with the highest levels of efficiency at 2 mg/mL, neutralizing (dead + inactivated), 94%, 92% and 94% of parasites, respectively. Salvia rosmarinus EO gave a lower efficacy, resulting in a percentage of 38%. Interestingly, no adverse effects were highlighted in toxicity tests on honeybees. These results show that these OEs of the Lamiaceae family have antiparasitic action on V. destructor. Therefore, they could be used, individually or combined, to exploit the synergistic effect for a more sustainable control of this parasite mite in honeybee farms.

1. Introduction

Apis mellifera, also known as the Western honeybee, is one of the most significant insect species in the world [1]. In fact, its breeding provides products with important pharmaceutical and nutraceutical characteristics, such as honey, propolis, pollen and wax [2,3]. It is also prized for the pollination services [4]. Given the significance of honeybees to agriculture and ecosystems, problems that affect their health are a matter of universal concern. When compared to long-term historical averages, the annual loss of managed honeybee colonies has increased dramatically in recent years due to several reasons [5]. Varroa destructor is consensually recognized as the most serious cause of colony loss [6]. With its parasitization, the mite alters cuticle properties, the immunological response system and the weight and fitness of freshly emerging adult honeybees by feeding on the fat body [7,8]. Additionally, V. destructor is the vector of many viruses [9]. Individuals that are infected become weaker and have shorter lives, and the illness might result in the final colony collapse (CCD) [10,11,12]. The cycle of V. destructor is strongly connected to and timed with honeybee brood development [13]. Adult females of the mite enter the honeybee colony, carried by workers and drones, typically hiding behind the honeybees’ abdominal sternites, and enter the brood cells only a few hours before closing [14,15]. V. destructor has an exponential growth in the colony [16]. If infestation is not controlled, honeybee populations in colonies with heavy infestations decline dramatically and finally collapse [17]. Controlling infestation is even more important due to climate change, which leads to nutritionally impoverished ecosystems [18,19]. Several studies have shown that a diet deficient in pollen, both in quantity and quality, can interfere with the honeybees’ immune response to pathogenic noxa [20,21]. To keep mite numbers in check in temperate locations, colonies may need to be treated multiple times a year with acaricides [22]. The use of synthetic acaricides has long been seen to be the most efficient method of controlling V. destructor. Aside from their diminishing effectiveness brought on by the emergence of pharmacological resistance, the misuse of these active ingredients has frequently resulted in contamination of hive products, with possible implications for human and honeybee health [23,24,25,26]. The need to develop new and risk-free approaches to parasite management is growing as a result. Natural products (NPs) and their derivatives present a more appealing alternative to synthetic drugs [27,28,29,30,31]. NPs have been shown to have important pharmacological properties that have been validated in experimental studies in human and veterinary medicine [30,32,33,34,35]. Compounds belonging to the broad category of NPs are also attractive because they are often inexpensive and pose fewer health problems for both humans and honeybees [36,37]. As a result, beekeepers are increasingly interested in their use [38]. Because of this, the usage of organic acids and EOs is growing. However, a number of studies indicate that using organic acids to counteract V. destructor infestation may be detrimental to honeybee health [39]. For instance, an open and closed brood is observed to be damaged and removed [40,41]. In addition, irreversible damage to honeybees’ digestive and excretory organs and glands, damage to the queen or often even her premature death and a drop in the pH of honey in the following season have been reported [42,43,44]. With this in mind, EOs seem to be a better option for lowering pest populations. EOs are defined as odorous compounds that are typically produced from botanically specified plant raw materials [45]. They are typically separated from the aqueous phase by using a physical technique that has no impact on their chemical makeup [46]. Terpenoids and phenylpropanoids, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, aldehydes and alcohols, as well as other components, can be found in EOs [45]. EOs showed a wide range of activity, from fatal to sublethal effects against a variety of insects and mites [47,48,49,50]. EOs from a variety of plant families, including Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Chenopodiaceae, Cupressaceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Myrtaceae, Zingiberaceae, Umbelliferae and Geraniaceae, have been shown to possess acaricidal properties [49,51,52,53,54]. In fact, there has been a steady increase in recent years in the amount of scientific attention paid to the use of EOs in parasite control and pest management tactics [30,31,37,39,55,56,57]. Given that they are mixtures of many components, they have been seen to have a variety of mechanisms of action, ranging from acute toxicity to repellency, antinutritional and developmental inhibitory effects, and they influence neurological and metabolic processes [45]. As a result, resistance to these botanical derivatives has only little changed, and it can be said that these plant-derived substances are safe and effective substitutes for harmful synthetic pesticides. Therefore, EOs are among the most promising natural alternatives to chemicals since they have few negative side effects. In addition to their acaricidal actions, EOs frequently have antibacterial properties as well, which can benefit the health of honeybee colonies as a whole [58,59].
The aim of this work was to demonstrate the in vitro acaricidal efficacy of EOs extracted from botanical species belonging to the Lamiaceae family originating from the Calabria region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants and EOs’ Extraction

In natural growing areas of the Calabria region (Southern Italy), at altitudes between 200 and 800 m above sea level (masl), the aerial parts of Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum, Thymus capitatus, Thymus longicaulis and Salvia rosmarinus were gathered during their balsamic period (June/July). Voucher specimens of each tested species were deposited in positions 5 (Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum), 12 (Thymus capitatus), 54 (Thymus longicaulis) and 42 (Salvia rosmarinus) of the Lamiaceae family at the Mediterranean Ethnobotanical Conservatory, Sersale (CZ), Italy.
For each botanical species, fresh plant material was cleaned and subjected to a 2-h steam distillation process, using a steel extractor apparatus (Albrigi Luigi, Verona, Italy) to extract the EOs. The obtained EOs were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored at +4 °C.

2.2. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analyses

A Trace GC–FID ultra gas chromatograph (Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) was used for the chemical analysis. Each distilled EO was solubilized in hexane before analysis, and then 1 μL of EO was injected. A silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness) fused with DB-5 (J&W Scientific) was employed for the cold on-column injection. Conditions for the chromatograph were as follows: 300 °C was the detector temperature, and a 4 °C min−1 program was used to program the column temperature from 60 °C (5 min isothermal) to 280 °C (15 min isothermal). The carrier gas was hydrogen (35 kP; 2.0 mL/min). The 32-bit computer program Chrom-Card was used to process the data. Based on the total peak regions found in the GC-FID analysis, the composition of the EOs’ components is given as a percentage. There were no correction factors used.
A Hewlett Packard 6890-5973 mass spectrometer interfaced with an HP Chemstation (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to perform the GC-MS analysis. The following were the chromatographic conditions: injector temperature of 280 °C and column oven program of 60 °C (5 min isothermal) to 270 °C (30 min isothermal) at 4 °C/min. The carrier gas (helium; 1 mL/min flow rate) was used. The capillary column used was an HP-5 MS (30 m 9 0.25 mm; 0.25 µm film thickness). The MS was operated with the following parameters: vacuum, 10-5 torr; ion source temperature, 200 °C; and electron current, 34.6 µA. Mass spectra were obtained at 1 scan/s, spanning the 40–800 amu range. The electron impact mode was used by the ion source. The splitless sampling approach was used to inject samples (1 µL). The chemical composition of the analyzed EOs was determined by comparing the GC retention times of their constituents with known authentic reference compounds (purchased by Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) in combination with Kovats Indexes (KIs) and by means of reference mass spectra from standard compounds and/or from NIST mass spectral library files [60].

2.3. Mite Harvesting

The tests were conducted in June/July 2023 at the Institute of Research for Food Safety and Health—IRC-FSH, in the University “Magna Græcia” of Catanzaro. Two apiaries in the province of Catanzaro in the Calabria region of Southern Italy were employed as a source of mites. Acaricide treatments had not been administered to study colonies in the six months before; consequently, they were severely naturally infected with V. destructor. In a nutshell, numerous frames containing drone brood were moved from the apiary to the mite collection laboratory. The procedure for mite collection is outlined below. Each brood cell in the frame was opened, depriving it of the wax layer that ensures its closure, and examined. Inspectional examination of the cell included removing the pupa inside it, observing it for the presence of any mites on its body and, finally, observing the cell walls for mites above them. When the mites were observed, they were picked up with a fine-bristled paintbrush and placed in a Petri dish. To prevent malnutrition during harvesting operations, mites were supplied with a honeybee larva (5th stage) and/or a pupa. The toxicological tests were carried out right away after the mites were collected. Mites that seemed to have just molted, to be weak or to be abnormally shaped were removed before each test because they could have responded differently in bioassays.

2.4. Toxicity towards V. destructor

To investigate the acute toxicity of the EOs, a topical residual bioassay was used, adopting the method from Bava et al., 2021, which slightly modified the procedure of Gashout and Guzman-Novoa, 2009 [37,61]. At least one hundred and fifty mites were gathered for each daily test in order to create the experimental replicates. Serial dilutions of the four EOs were tested. In particular, the active ingredient, namely Amitraz (Merck, 45323), and the tested EOs were diluted in acetone to concentrations of 2 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL. Amitraz and essential oils are, in fact, difficult to solubilize in water, but they are soluble in organic solvents, such as acetone [62,63,64,65]. For the toxicity tests, Amitraz and acetone alone were utilized as positive and negative controls. Eppendorf tubes (2 mL) were filled with 50 µL of diluted EOs and set open in the oven to allow the acetone to evaporate. To facilitate the evaporation of the acetone and to coat the tube walls with EOs, the tubes were frequently rolled on their walls. This operation was repeated for 15–20 min. It was confirmed by Gashout and Guzmán-Novoa, 2009, that the high boiling point of the tested products, which exceeds 200 °C, makes it unlikely that a substantial portion of them would have evaporated in this time frame, whereas the boiling point of acetone is lower [61,66]. A fine paintbrush was then used to carefully insert five adult female mites into the previously prepared tube for each technical replicate, as well as for the positive and negative controls. After the mites were introduced, the tubes were sealed and put in a dark chamber for incubation at 34 °C and 65% relative humidity. The humidity and temperature values set are those that are normally present at the brood-area level in the hive nest. These values were shown in earlier research to be more favorable for the growth and reproduction of V. destructor [37,67]. To establish acute toxicity, after 1 h of exposure, mite mortality was recorded. Therefore, the mites in each Eppendorf tube were moved to a Petri dish and observed under a stereomicroscope. If the mites did not move when touched, they were classified as dead. Mites were classified as inactive when they moved only one or more legs but could not move from their position. The inactive state was equated with death. Inactive and dead mites were considered equally neutralized. This experimental design included ten technical replicates for each EO and its different concentrations.

2.5. Toxicity towards Honeybees

Using a randomly selected group of individuals, the toxicity of EOs toward adult honeybees was studied. The individuals that made up the pool came from different frames in the hive; a system that allowed for a sample of honeybees of various ages was employed. Specifically, the different frames were shaken in a container, the honeybees were sprayed with water to prevent them from flying and then mixed. Samples of these honeybees were transported to the laboratory to be processed to toxicity tests. Five experimental replicates were set up for each EO. According to Bava et al., 2021, two 50 mL Falcon tubes were filled with 1.6 mL of EO diluted in acetone [37]. One test tube was filled with the same amount of acetone as a negative control. The amount of 1.6 mL to be introduced into the Falcon tube was chosen in proportion to the volume used for the mite toxicity tests in the Eppendorf tube. As in the viability tests for V. destructor, the Falcon tubes were rolled on their walls many times to coat them with liquid and let the acetone in the solution evaporate. Five honeybees were put into the tubes that had previously held the EO solution. Finally, the honeybee-filled Falcon tubes were moved to an incubator (34 °C and 65% relative humidity). After one hour of exposure, according to William et al. (2013), the honeybees were put in cages (cylindrical plastic box, length = 90 mm, height = 100 mm) [68]. A fifty percent sucrose solution and water feeders were installed in these cages. The following 48 h were spent monitoring the honeybees.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The program GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Softwar, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni test were used for statistical analyses, where there were multiple comparisons. Using the web program Metabo-Analyst version 5.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca, accessed on 16 October 2023), a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. The integrity of the data was examined. In place of missing values, LoDs (1/5 of each variable’s lowest positive value) were used. Log transformation was used to standardize the data, and Pareto scaling was used to pretreat them. An additional method used to graph the chemical compositions of the various EOs was clustered heat mapping.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition

The steam distillation of the aerial parts of Thymus species allowed us to obtain yields equal to 0.4% (T. capitatus) and 0.1% w/w (T. longicaulis), while the yield of the volatile oil from Salvia rosmarinus was equal to 0.3%. The highest EOs yield (0.8% w/w) was obtained for Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum. The chemical constituents of the investigated EOs were identified with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). As reported in Table 1, 51 compounds were identified.
Overall, 1,8-cineole (0.83–46.92%), linalool acetate (65.27% in OV sample), thymol (0.18–31.67%) and carvacrol (0.23–54.74%) were the most abundant components, even if differently distributed among the samples. Furthermore, linalool (0.28–15.84%), borneol (2.17–11.96%), carvacrol acetate (15.22%) and β-Caryophyllene (3.87–12.58%) were detected at percentages above 10%. Other components, such as α-pinene, β-pinene, γ-terpinene, α-terpineol and thymol methyl ether, were detected at percentages above 5%.
A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in order to have a clear overview of the distribution of the secondary metabolites in the four investigated essential oils.
The data matrix consisted of 12 samples (three determinations for each EO) and 51 variables (constituent metabolites). Figure 1 reports the biplot of the scores and loading values that were obtained by considering the first and the second principal components, which explained 77.7% of the total variance (with PC1 and PC2 explaining 44.9% and 32.9%, respectively).
The biplot clearly shows the different composition of the EOs. Salvia rosmarinus (SR) samples, located in the upper right half of the scores and loadings biplot, were characterized by a higher content of α- and β-pinene (compound nos. 2 and 5), camphene (3), 1,8-cineole (14), camphor (22), borneol (23) and bornyl acetate (29) compared to the other essential oils.
Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (OV) was instead located in the lower part of the plot, since it is mostly characterized by the presence of linalool acetate (28) and also β-ocimene (15), linalool (20), 1-octen-3-ol acetate (21), carvacrol methyl ether (27), linalool acetate (28), geranyl acetate (36) and β-bluebonnet (37).
Furthermore, the two Thymus species, T. capitatus (TC) and T. longicaulis (TL), were clearly discriminated in the upper left half of the plot and characterized by the highest content of carvacrol (31) and other constituents, such as o-cymene (12), γ-terpinene (16), cis-sabinene hydrate (17) and terpinen-4-ol (24).
The different distribution of the secondary metabolites is also visualized in the heatmap reported in Figure 2.

3.2. V. destructor Toxicity

The percentages and standard deviations (SDs) of the neutralization of the V. destructor parasite at the concentrations of 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/mL with each EO, acetone (negative control) and Amitraz (positive control) are presented in Figure 3 and Table 2, while Figure 2 represents the effects of the EO on neutralization of mites.
Thymus capitatus, Thymus longicaulis and Origanum vulgare sbps. viridulum concentrations of 0.5, 1 and 2 were found to be more effective acaricides than Amitraz 0.5. Furthermore, the three different concentrations achieved a mite neutralization comparable to that obtained with Amitraz 1 and 2. Salvia rosmarinus, on the other hand, already at a concentration of 0.5, was not comparable to the effectiveness of Amitraz 0.5.

3.3. Toxicity towards Honeybees

The mortality of the honeybees, exposed to the EO-treated surface, was assessed at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h. No mortality or abnormal behavior was noted during the 48 h of registration.

4. Discussion

Acute or chronic negative effects on mammals and non-target organisms, including birds, bees, parasitoids, and predators, as well as the emergence of pest resistance, have all been linked to the overuse of synthetic chemicals in pest management programs [69,70,71]. Residues have also been found on food and drinking-water supplies [72]. This situation has led scientists to concentrate their efforts on the search for plant-derived EOs from various plant genera and families. Plant EOs are harmless to mammals and other vertebrate animals [73,74]. Moreover, because they have a complex chemical composition and produce different mechanisms of toxic action, it is quite unlikely that parasites will develop resistance to them [45]. The Lamiaceae species were the focus of the current research since they are more accessible and widespread than other botanical species [75]. The EOs from Lamiaceae plants and their constituents, which have a variety of lethal and sublethal effects against various harmful insects and mites in the field, greenhouse and storage conditions, have great potential for use in pest management strategies and are regarded as safe, readily available and environmentally friendly alternatives to synthetic chemicals. In this research, the EOs that showed the most effectiveness were those of Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum, Thymus capitatus, Thymus longicaulis and Salvia rosmarinus. When compared to the negative control (only acetone), all the EOs tested showed a high degree of effectiveness, and even at 0.5 mg/mL, their efficacy was statistically significant. Compared to the positive control, Thymus capitatuts, Thymus longicaulis and Origanum vulgare EOs, at different concentrations, were more effective or comparable to Amitraz. Only Salvia rosmarinus resulted in a lower efficacy compared to the lesser Amitraz concentration. The ability of thyme EO to control V. destructor infestation is well known. The thyme species most frequently studied for its acaricidal efficacy is Thymus vulgaris [76,77]. In this study, it was decided to focus on the species Thymus capitatus and Thymus longicaulis. In a recent study by Ghasemi et al., 2016, cage fumigation trials against V. destructor were conducted using the EO of Thymus kotschyanus [78]. The EO caused a mild mortality rate of 54.4% and 84.43% after 5 and 10 h of fumigation. In the study by Damiani et al., 2009, the efficacy of Thymus vulgaris was tested in a total exposure experiment. LC50, after 72 h of exposure, was 2.93 (2.27–3.53) [77]. However, the experiment most similar to the one conducted in this study is that of Hybl et al., 2021 [39]. The authors equally used a residual contact toxicity test. Also, in Hybl et al.’s 2021 experiment, thyme EO proved to be among the EOs with the best mite abatement rates [39]. The EO was able to kill 100% of the mites after 2 h of exposure. In the same study, the EO of oregano was evaluated, which also resulted in the death of 100% of the mites after two hours [39]. The EO of oregano, specifically O. heracleoticum, had already been assayed by our research group. In the previous experiment, the EO also proved to have an excellent ability to control V. destructor, neutralizing 90.9% of the mites tested at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. In our studies, the lower-efficacy results found compared to Hybl et al., 2021 [39], can be attributed to the shorter exposure times of mites to EOs. In fact, we chose to test for death after one hour and not two. This choice was dictated by the consideration that mites suffer from malnutrition and dehydration when kept more than four hours away from their natural environment, as pointed out by Milani et al., 2001 [79]. Furthermore, it is important to say that the results of research conducted with the same botanical species in different studies could lead to different results because the essential oils extracted from a botanical species have a different composition that is influenced by the characteristics of the soil in which the plant grows, the exposure to the sun, and the adaptations that the plant uses to grow better in the environment [37].
In general, our results confirm and are in accordance with those of Koc et al. (2013) [80], who reported that EOs with higher concentrations of carvacrol have greater acaricidal action. In the EOs of the species belonging to the Lamiaceae family, the most representative molecule is carvacrol, a monoterpene produced from γ-pinene [81]. According to Koc et al., 2013, EOs with higher concentrations of carvacrol have greater acaricidal action [80]. Studies have shown that low amounts of this molecule are effective in killing several mite species, thus demonstrating its toxicity [80,82,83]. Also, for these reasons, four EOs—Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link, Thymus longicaulis C. Presl, and Salvia rosmarinus Schleid.—were chosen. The three investigated EOs containing this compound showed the best activity, while, on the contrary, lower biological effects were observed for Salvia rosmarinus essential oil, which lacked this constituent (Table 1). Due to the well-established connections between these molecules and plant defense, we can argue that the poisonous action of these monoterpenes in combination with other substances, such as phenylpropanoids, determined the acaricidal activity of the EOs. In a previous study, we demonstrated how the interaction between and synergistic action of the compounds that make up the phytocomplex give the EOs greater efficacy than the individual components [56]. However, when compounds with particular efficacy are found in nature, as in the case of carvacrol, one could consider isolating this molecule to exploit its high acaricidal action. Continuing our reflection, it must be said that, when designing a field formulation, one limitation of the EOs and carvacrol that should be contained is their high volatility and poor solubility in water. These characteristics make administration difficult. In order to make them more soluble and to provide a delivery shuttle that can pass across biological membranes, β-cyclodextrins (β-CD) complexation has shown to be a successful technique. Cyclodextrin complexes offer a very interesting means of overcoming drawbacks and favoring ease of handling, so as to maximize the potential benefits of EOs [84]. The use of cyclodextrins can lead to an increase in the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs, improved bioavailability, increased stability due to the increased protection of the molecule included in the cyclodextrin and, finally, a decrease in volatility and an increase in half-life. Alternatively, nanoencapsulation can be considered. The latter improves biological activity by offering stability and protection against changing environmental conditions from outside [85]. The encapsulating matrix that can be used to effectively encapsulate essential oils consists of proteins, polysaccharides and lipids, which are derived from plant (starch, cellulose and gluten), animal (dextrin, chitosan and casein), marine, and microbial sources. These materials have the characteristics of being highly soluble in water, biodegradable and readily available [86,87]. Encapsulation methods, including ionic gelation, coacervation, liposomes, nanoemulsions and nanoprecipitation, could all be favorably employed. The above makes us realize that, although promising and remarkable, the efficacy results found for these EOs must be read as preliminary study data. Further laboratory and field studies are needed to arrive at a stable formulation that possesses, when administered in the field, a neutralization percentage of 90% or more, as recommended for substances of natural origin by the “Guideline on veterinary medicinal products controlling Varroa destructor parasitosis in bees” [88].

5. Conclusions

The results of the present article show that the hydrodistilled EOs from four selected Lamiaceae plants, which are native to the Calabria region in Italy, expressed interesting in vitro acaricidal activity. These EOs could be used singly or in combination to maintain V. destructor populations below the damage threshold. A residual toxicity test was used to ascertain the acaricidal activity of the EOs. Having given this test extremely positive results, one could speculate on a better ability of total exposure tests to neutralize mites. These types of tests would also be interesting to conduct. Field studies would also be needed to totally validate the efficacy of these EO species and to select the best vehicle for administering these products. Indeed, EOs evaporate rapidly or more slowly when exposed to exogenous environmental temperature factors. Field studies, outside controlled environmental laboratory conditions, should investigate the most suitable carrier for administration. Certainly, ours and other studies in line with it pave the way for a new concept of drug treatment in beekeeping that is more in line with an environmentally and consumer-friendly strategy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.B., F.C. (Fabio Castagna), C.L., M.M. and E.P.; methodology, R.B., F.C. (Fabio Castagna), M.M., M.P.A., G.S. and E.P.; software, R.B., S.R., M.M. and M.P.A.; formal analysis, R.B., S.R. and M.M.; investigation, R.B., F.C. (Fabio Castagna), C.L., M.M. and M.P.A.; data curation, R.B., S.R. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B., F.C. (Fabio Castagna), C.L., S.R., V.M., F.C. (Filomena Conforti), M.M., M.P.A., G.S., D.B. and E.P.; writing—review and editing, R.B., F.C. (Fabio Castagna), C.L., S.R., V.M., F.C. (Filomena Conforti), M.M., M.P.A., G.S., D.B. and E.P.; supervision, G.S. and E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are kept at Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro and are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Elshafiey, E.H.; Shetaia, A.A.; El-Wahed, A.A.A.; Algethami, A.F.; Musharraf, S.G.; AlAjmi, M.F.; Zhao, C.; Masry, S.H.D.; Abdel-Daim, M.M. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects 2021, 12, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kolayli, S.; Keskin, M. Natural bee products and their apitherapeutic applications. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2020, 66, 175–196. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, R. Hive products: Pollen, propolis and royal jelly. Bee World 1989, 70, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Breeze, T.D.; Bailey, A.P.; Balcombe, K.G.; Potts, S.G. Pollination services in the UK: How important are honeybees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 142, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mutinelli, F.; Costa, C.; Lodesani, M.; Baggio, A.; Medrzycki, P.; Formato, G.; Porrini, C. Honey bee colony losses in Italy. J. Apic. Res. 2010, 49, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neumann, P.; Carreck, N.L. Honey bee colony losses. J. Apic. Res. 2010, 49, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guzmán-Novoa, E.; Eccles, L.; Calvete, Y.; McGowan, J.; Kelly, P.G.; Correa-Benítez, A. Varroa destructor is the main culprit for the death and reduced populations of overwintered honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies in Ontario, Canada. Apidologie 2010, 41, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Boecking, O.; Genersch, E. Varroosis—The ongoing crisis in bee keeping. J. Für Verbraucherschutz Leb. 2008, 3, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Francis, R.M.; Nielsen, S.L.; Kryger, P. Varroa-Virus Interaction in Collapsing Honey Bee Colonies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flores, J.M.; Gámiz, V.; Jiménez-Marín, Á.; Flores-Cortés, A.; Gil-Lebrero, S.; Garrido, J.J.; Hernando, M.D. Impact of Varroa destructor and associated pathologies on the colony collapse disorder affecting honey bees. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Highfield, A.C.; El Nagar, A.; Mackinder, L.C.M.; Noël, L.M.-L.; Hall, M.J.; Martin, S.J.; Schroeder, D.C. Deformed wing virus implicated in overwintering honeybee colony losses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7212–7220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schroeder, D.C.; Martin, S.J. Deformed wing virus: The main suspect in unexplained honeybee deaths worldwide. Virulence 2012, 3, 589–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Steiner, J.; Dittmann, F.; Rosenkranz, P.; Engels, W. The first gonocycle of the parasitic mite (Varroa jacobsoni) in relation to preimaginal development of its host, the honey bee (Apis mellifra carnica). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 1994, 25, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nazzi, F.; Le Conte, Y. Ecology of Varroa destructor, the Major Ectoparasite of the Western Honey Bee, Apis mellifera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2016, 61, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Noël, A.; Le Conte, Y.; Mondet, F. Varroa destructor: How does it harm Apis mellifera honey bees and what can be done about it? Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2020, 4, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris, J.W.; Harbo, J.R.; Villa, J.D.; Danka, R.G. Variable population growth of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) in colonies of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) during a 10-year period. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Carresi, C.; Cardamone, A.; Federico, G.; Roncada, P.; Palma, E.; Musella, V.; Britti, D. Comparison of Two Diagnostic Techniques for the Apis mellifera Varroatosis: Strengths, Weaknesses and Impact on the Honeybee Health. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Descamps, C.; Quinet, M.; Jacquemart, A.-L. Climate change–induced stress reduce quantity and alter composition of nectar and pollen from a bee-pollinated species (Borago officinalis, Boraginaceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 755843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Borghi, M.; Perez de Souza, L.; Yoshida, T.; Fernie, A.R. Flowers and climate change: A metabolic perspective. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 1425–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Di Pasquale, G.; Salignon, M.; Le Conte, Y.; Belzunces, L.P.; Decourtye, A.; Kretzschmar, A.; Suchail, S.; Brunet, J.-L.; Alaux, C. Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: Do pollen quality and diversity matter? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Dooremalen, C.; Stam, E.; Gerritsen, L.; Cornelissen, B.; Van der Steen, J.; Van Langevelde, F.; Blacquière, T. Interactive effect of reduced pollen availability and Varroa destructor infestation limits growth and protein content of young honey bees. J. Insect Physiol. 2013, 59, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Palma, E.; Ceniti, C.; Millea, M.; Lupia, C.; Britti, D.; Musella, V. Prevalence of Varroa destructor in Honeybee (Apis mellifera) Farms and Varroosis Control Practices in Southern Italy. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Medici, S.K.; Maggi, M.D.; Sarlo, E.G.; Ruffinengo, S.; Marioli, J.M.; Eguaras, M.J. The presence of synthetic acaricides in beeswax and its influence on the development of resistance in Varroa destructor. J. Apic. Res. 2015, 54, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Higes, M.; Martín-Hernández, R.; Sara Hernández-Rodríguez, C.; González-Cabrera, J. Assessing the resistance to acaricides in Varroa destructor from several Spanish locations. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3595–3601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lodesani, M.; Costa, C.; Serra, G.; Colombo, R.; Sabatini, A.G. Acaricide residues in beeswax after conversion to organic beekeeping methods. Apidologie 2008, 39, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Milani, N. The resistance of Varroa jacobsoni Oud. to acaricides. Apidologie 1999, 30, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bade, R.; Chan, H.-F.; Reynisson, J. Characteristics of known drug space. Natural products, their derivatives and synthetic drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5646–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Castagna, F.; Bava, R.; Musolino, V.; Piras, C.; Cardamone, A.; Carresi, C.; Lupia, C.; Bosco, A.; Rinaldi, L.; Cringoli, G. Potential new therapeutic approaches based on Punica granatum fruits compared to synthetic anthelmintics for the sustainable control of gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. Animals 2022, 12, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Štrbac, F.; Bosco, A.; Maurelli, M.P.; Ratajac, R.; Stojanović, D.; Simin, N.; Orčić, D.; Pušić, I.; Krnjajić, S.; Sotiraki, S.; et al. Anthelmintic Properties of Essential Oils to Control Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep—In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Štrbac, F.; Krnjajić, S.; Maurelli, M.P.; Stojanović, D.; Simin, N.; Orčić, D.; Ratajac, R.; Petrović, K.; Knežević, G.; Cringoli, G. A potential anthelmintic phytopharmacological source of Origanum vulgare (L.) essential oil against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Animals 2022, 13, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maiuolo, J.; Bulotta, R.M.; Oppedisano, F.; Bosco, F.; Scarano, F.; Nucera, S.; Guarnieri, L.; Ruga, S.; Macri, R.; Caminiti, R. Potential Properties of Natural Nutraceuticals and Antioxidants in Age-Related Eye Disorders. Life 2022, 13, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Castagna, F.; Piras, C.; Palma, E.; Musolino, V.; Lupia, C.; Bosco, A.; Rinaldi, L.; Cringoli, G.; Musella, V.; Britti, D. Green veterinary pharmacology applied to parasite control: Evaluation of Punica granatum, Artemisia campestris, Salix caprea aqueous macerates against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bosco, A.; Kießler, J.; Amadesi, A.; Varady, M.; Hinney, B.; Ianniello, D.; Maurelli, M.P.; Cringoli, G.; Rinaldi, L. The threat of reduced efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep from an area considered anthelmintic resistance-free. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mollace, V.; Scicchitano, M.; Paone, S.; Casale, F.; Calandruccio, C.; Gliozzi, M.; Musolino, V.; Carresi, C.; Maiuolo, J.; Nucera, S. Hypoglycemic and hypolipemic effects of a new lecithin formulation of bergamot polyphenolic fraction: A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord.-Drug Targets (Former. Curr. Drug Targets-Immune Endocr. Metab. Disord.) 2019, 19, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kiruthika, S.; Vishali, S. Industrial Application of Essential Oils. Essent. Oils Extr. Methods Appl. 2023, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Piras, C.; Palma, E.; Cringoli, G.; Musolino, V.; Lupia, C.; Perri, M.R.; Statti, G.; Britti, D.; et al. In vitro evaluation of acute toxicity of five Citrus spp. Essential oils towards the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maggi, M.; Tourn, E.; Negri, P.; Szawarski, N.; Marconi, A.; Gallez, L.; Medici, S.; Ruffinengo, S.; Brasesco, C.; De Feudis, L. A new formulation of oxalic acid for Varroa destructor control applied in Apis mellifera colonies in the presence of brood. Apidologie 2016, 47, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hýbl, M.; Bohatá, A.; Rádsetoulalová, I.; Kopecký, M.; Hoštičková, I.; Vaníčková, A.; Mráz, P. Evaluating the Efficacy of 30 Different Essential Oils against Varroa destructor and Honey Bee Workers (Apis mellifera). Insects 2021, 12, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schneider, S.; Eisenhardt, D.; Rademacher, E. Sublethal effects of oxalic acid on Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Changes ins behaviour and longevity. Apidologie 2012, 43, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ostermann, D.J.; Currie, R.W. Effect of formic acid formulations on honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies and influence of colony and ambient conditions on formic acid concentration in the hive. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Siegfried, B.D. The Effect of Oxalic Acid Treatments on Queen Survival and Drone Semen Viability. Available online: https://rd.almondboard.com (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  43. Papežíková, I.; Palíková, M.; Kremserová, S.; Zachová, A.; Peterová, H.; Babák, V.; Navrátil, S. Effect of oxalic acid on the mite Varroa destructor and its host the honey bee Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 2017, 56, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Strachecka, A.; Paleolog, J.; Olszewski, K.; Borsuk, G. Influence of amitraz and oxalic acid on the cuticle proteolytic system of Apis mellifera L. workers. Insects 2012, 3, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Palma, E.; Marrelli, M.; Conforti, F.; Musolino, V.; Carresi, C.; Lupia, C.; Ceniti, C.; Tilocca, B. Essential Oils for a Sustainable Control of Honeybee Varroosis. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Asbahani, A.E.; Miladi, K.; Badri, W.; Sala, M.; Addi, E.H.A.; Casabianca, H.; Mousadik, A.E.; Hartmann, D.; Jilale, A.; Renaud, F.N.R.; et al. Essential oils: From extraction to encapsulation. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 483, 220–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdelgaleil, S.A.M.; Mohamed, M.I.E.; Badawy, M.E.I.; El-Arami, S.A.A. Fumigant and contact toxicities of monoterpenes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Safavi, S.A.; Mobki, M. Susceptibility of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst, 1797) larvae to essential oils of Citrus reticulata blanco fruit peels and the synergist, diethyl maleate. Biharean Biol. 2016, 10, 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  49. Aboelhadid, S.M.; Arafa, W.M.; Abdel-Baki, A.A.S.; Sokmen, A.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Hassan, A.O.; Kamel, A.A. Acaricidal activity of Foeniculum vulgare against Rhipicephalus annulatus is mainly dependent on its constituent from trans-anethone. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chou, J.T.; Rossignol, P.A.; Ayres, J.W. Evaluation of Commercial Insect Repellents on Human Skin Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1997, 34, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Romo-Chacón, A.; Martínez-Contreras, L.J.; Molina-Corral, F.J.; Acosta-Muñiz, C.H.; Ríos-Velasco, C.; De León-Door, A.P.; Rivera, R. Evaluation of oregano (Lippia berlandieri) essential oil and Entomopathogenic Fungi for Varroa destructor control in colonies of honey bee, Apis mellifera. Southwest. Entomol. 2016, 41, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aglagane, A.; Laghzaoui, E.-M.; Soulaimani, B.; Er-Rguibi, O.; Abbad, A.; El Mouden, E.H.; Aourir, M. Acaricidal activity of Mentha suaveolens subsp. timija, Chenopodium ambrosioides, and Laurus nobilis essential oils, and their synergistic combinations against the ectoparasitic bee mite, Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae). J. Apic. Res. 2022, 61, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rajendran, S.; Sriranjini, V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, B.H.; Annis, P.C.; Tumaalii, F.; Choi, W.S. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils from the Myrtaceae family and 1,8-cineole against 3 major stored-grain insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2004, 40, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Conti, B.; Bocchino, R.; Cosci, F.; Ascrizzi, R.; Flamini, G.; Bedini, S. Essential oils against Varroa destructor: A soft way to fight the parasitic mite of Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 2020, 59, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Palma, E.; Musolino, V.; Carresi, C.; Cardamone, A.; Lupia, C.; Marrelli, M.; Conforti, F.; Roncada, P. Phytochemical Profile of Foeniculum vulgare subsp. piperitum Essential Oils and Evaluation of Acaricidal Efficacy against Varroa destructor in Apis mellifera by In Vitro and Semi-Field Fumigation Tests. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Štrbac, F.; Krnjajić, S.; Stojanović, D.; Ratajac, R.; Simin, N.; Orčić, D.; Rinaldi, L.; Ciccone, E.; Maurelli, M.P.; Cringoli, G. Invitro and in vivo anthelmintic efficacy of peppermint (Mentha x piperita L.) essential oil against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1232570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Eguaras, M.J.; Fuselli, S.; Gende, L.; Fritz, R.; Ruffinengo, S.R.; Clemente, G.; Gonzalez, A.; Bailac, P.N.; Ponzi, M.I. An in vitro evaluation of Tagetes minuta essential oil for the control of the honeybee pathogens Paenibacillus larvae and Ascosphaera apis, and the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Knobloch, K.; Pauli, A.; Iberl, B.; Weigand, H.; Weis, N. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oil components. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1989, 1, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 5th ed.; Texensis Publication: Gruver, TX, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gashout, H.A.; Guzmán-Novoa, E. Acute toxicity of Essential oils and other natural compounds to the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor, and to larval and adult worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J. Apic. Res. 2009, 48, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tseng, S.-H.; Chang, P.-C.; Chou, S.-S. Determination of amitraz residue in fruits by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Food Drug Anal. 1999, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mutete, F.B.; Bweupe, N.; Chiyenu, K.O.R.; Mutengo, K.H. Amitraz poisoning—A case report of a common but highly misconstrued cause of poisoning in Zambia. Med. J. Zamb. 2019, 46, 254–258. [Google Scholar]
  64. Natrajan, D.; Srinivasan, S.; Sundar, K.; Ravindran, A. Formulation of essential oil-loaded chitosan–alginate nanocapsules. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Samfira, I.; Rodino, S.; Petrache, P.; Cristina, R.T.; Butu, M.; Butnariu, M. Characterization and identity confirmation of essential oils by mid infrared absorption spectrophotometry. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2015, 10, 557–566. [Google Scholar]
  66. Lide, D.R. (Ed.) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 88th ed.; National Institute of Standards and Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK, 2007; 2640p, ISBN 0-8493-0488-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Le Conte, Y.; Arnold, G.; Desenfant, P. Influence of brood temperature and hygrometry variations on the development of the honey bee ectoparasite Varroa jacobsoni (Mesostigmata: Varroidae). Environ. Entomol. 1990, 19, 1780–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Williams, G.R.; Alaux, C.; Costa, C.; Csaki, T.; Doublet, V.; Eisenhardt, D.; Fries, I.; Kuhn, R.; McMahon, D.P.; Medrzycki, P. Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sharpe, R.M.; Irvine, D.S. How strong is the evidence of a link between environmental chemicals and adverse effects on human reproductive health? BMJ 2004, 328, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Mitra, A.; Chatterjee, C.; Mandal, F.B. Synthetic chemical pesticides and their effects on birds. Res. J. Env. Toxicol. 2011, 5, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jagne, J.; White, D.; Jefferson, F. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Adverse effects of bisphenol A and parabens to women’s health. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hamilton, D.; Crossley, S. Pesticide Residues in Food and Drinking Water: Human Exposure and Risks; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004; ISBN 0470091606. [Google Scholar]
  73. Batish, D.R.; Singh, H.P.; Kohli, R.K.; Kaur, S. Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 2166–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Regnault-Roger, C.; Vincent, C.; Arnason, J.T. Essential oils in insect control: Low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Venkateshappa, S.M.; Sreenath, K.P. Potential medicinal plants of Lamiaceae. Am. Int. J. Res. Form. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2013, 1, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  76. El-Bolok, D.M.R.; Mahfouz, H.M. Efficacy Of Some Plant Extracts Against Varroa destructor and Their Sideeffect On Honeybee Colonies. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 2021, 48, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Damiani, N.; Gende, L.B.; Bailac, P.; Marcangeli, J.A.; Eguaras, M.J. Acaricidal and insecticidal activity of essential oils on Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Parasitol. Res. 2009, 106, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ghasemi, V.; Moharramipour, S.; Tahmasbi, G.H. Laboratory cage studies on the efficacy of some medicinal plant essential oils for controlling varroosis in Apis mellifera (Hym.: Apidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 21, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Milani, N. Activity of oxalic and citric acids on the mite Varroa destructor in laboratory assays. Apidologie 2001, 32, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Koc, S.; Oz, E.; Cinbilgel, I.; Aydin, L.; Cetin, H. Acaricidal activity of Origanum bilgeri PH Davis (Lamiaceae) essential oil and its major component, carvacrol against adults Rhipicephalus turanicus (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 193, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kintzios, S.E. Oregano: The Genera Origanum and Lippia; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; ISBN 0203222091. [Google Scholar]
  82. Çetin, H.; Cilek, J.E.; Oz, E.; Aydin, L.; Deveci, O.; Yanikoglu, A. Acaricidal activity of Satureja thymbra L. essential oil and its major components, carvacrol and γ-terpinene against adult Hyalomma marginatum (Acari: Ixodidae). Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 170, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. De Oliveira Cruz, E.M.; Costa-Junior, L.M.; Pinto, J.A.O.; de Alexandria Santos, D.; de Araujo, S.A.; de Fátima Arrigoni-Blank, M.; Bacci, L.; Alves, P.B.; de Holanda Cavalcanti, S.C.; Blank, A.F. Acaricidal activity of Lippia gracilis essential oil and its major constituents on the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 195, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wadhwa, G.; Kumar, S.; Chhabra, L.; Mahant, S.; Rao, R. Essential oil–cyclodextrin complexes: An updated review. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2017, 89, 39–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Das, S.; Singh, V.K.; Chaudhari, A.K.; Dwivedy, A.K.; Dubey, N.K. Fabrication, physico-chemical characterization, and bioactivity evaluation of chitosan-linalool composite nano-matrix as innovative controlled release delivery system for food preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 188, 751–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Martín, Á.; Varona, S.; Navarrete, A.; Cocero, M.J. Encapsulation and co-precipitation processes with supercritical fluids: Applications with essential oils. Open Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 4, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vishwakarma, G.S.; Gautam, N.; Babu, J.N.; Mittal, S.; Jaitak, V. Polymeric encapsulates of essential oils and their constituents: A review of preparation techniques, characterization, and sustainable release mechanisms. Polym. Rev. 2016, 56, 668–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Agency, E.M. Guideline on Veterinary Medicinal Products Controlling Varroa destructor Parasitosis in Bees. 2007. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/homepage (accessed on 20 October 2023).
Figure 1. PCA biplot (PC1 vs. PC2) based on the chemical composition of the essential oils (EOs). OV, Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman; SR, Salvia rosmarinus Schleid; TC, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link; TL, Thymus longicaulis C. Presl. The serial numbers of phytochemicals are consistent with the peak numbering in Table 1.
Figure 1. PCA biplot (PC1 vs. PC2) based on the chemical composition of the essential oils (EOs). OV, Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman; SR, Salvia rosmarinus Schleid; TC, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link; TL, Thymus longicaulis C. Presl. The serial numbers of phytochemicals are consistent with the peak numbering in Table 1.
Vetsci 10 00701 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap of identified phytochemicals. Abbreviations are as follows: OV, Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman; SR, Salvia rosmarinus Schleid; TC, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link; TL, Thymus longicaulis C. Presl.
Figure 2. Heatmap of identified phytochemicals. Abbreviations are as follows: OV, Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman; SR, Salvia rosmarinus Schleid; TC, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link; TL, Thymus longicaulis C. Presl.
Vetsci 10 00701 g002
Figure 3. Effects of EO on neutralization of mites. *** p < 0.001 vs. acetone, ### p < 001 vs. Amitraz 0.5, ns (not significant) p > 0.05 vs. Amitraz 1 and Amitraz 2. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. The symbols indicate the degree of statistical significance: three symbols indicate a value of p ≤ 0.001, two symbols p ≤ 0.01, “ns” when p > 0.05. The red color is used for the positive control blox pot, the green color for the essential oil box plot.
Figure 3. Effects of EO on neutralization of mites. *** p < 0.001 vs. acetone, ### p < 001 vs. Amitraz 0.5, ns (not significant) p > 0.05 vs. Amitraz 1 and Amitraz 2. Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. The symbols indicate the degree of statistical significance: three symbols indicate a value of p ≤ 0.001, two symbols p ≤ 0.01, “ns” when p > 0.05. The red color is used for the positive control blox pot, the green color for the essential oil box plot.
Vetsci 10 00701 g003
Table 1. Chemical profile of investigated EOs.
Table 1. Chemical profile of investigated EOs.
No.Compound 1KI 2KI 3% ± SDi.m. 4
OVSRTCTL
1α-Thujene930932-0.10 ± 0.000.10 ± 0.000.25 ± 0.01GC-MS
2α-Pinene939937-7.55 ± 0.030.09 ± 0.010.24 ± 0.01GC, GC-MS
3Camphene954955-2.54 ± 0.020.08 ± 0.010.21 ± 0.01GC, GC-MS
4Sabinene975970---0.20 ± 0.01GC, GC-MS
5β-Pinene9799800.08 ± 0.006.48 ± 0.01-0.26 ± 0.01GC, GC-MS
61-Octen-3-ol980981---0.49 ± 0.02GC-MS
73-Octanone986984---2.22 ± 0.08GC-MS
8Myrcene991990-0.62 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.010.91 ± 0.06GC, GC-MS
93-Octanol993995---0.74 ± 0.05GC-MS
10α-Phellandrene10021001---0.35 ± 0.02GC, GC-MS
11α-Terpinene10181015-0.10 ± 0.010.23 ± 0.020.95 ± 0.06GC, GC-MS
12o-Cymene102210210.39 ± 0.01-2.16 ± 0.092.68 ± 0.13GC, GC-MS
13Limonene10291028--0.60 ± 0.02-GC, GC-MS
141,8-Cineole103110310.83 ± 0.0246.92 ± 0.04-8.85 ± 0.50GC, GC-MS
15β-Ocimene105010510.14 ± 0.01---GC-MS
16γ-Terpinene106210610.20 ± 0.000.28 ± 0.012.49 ± 0.095.86 ± 0.30GC, GC-MS
17cis-Sabinene hydrate106810700.20 ± 0.000.56 ± 0.010.97 ± 0.082.55 ± 0.20GC, GC-MS
18Terpinolene10881089-0.18 ± 0.01--GC-MS
19trans-Sabinene hydrate10971095-0.11 ± 0.010.22 ± 0.010.27 ± 0.03GC-MS
20Linalool1098110115.84 ± 0.000.28 ± 0.011.81 ± 0.125.14 ± 0.37GC, GC-MS
211-Octen-3-ol acetate111211190.38 ± 0.00---GC-MS
22Camphor11461142-8.49 ± 0.04-0.68 ± 0.08GC, GC-MS
23Borneol11691164-11.96 ± 0.072.17 ± 0.052.75 ± 0.19GC, GC-MS
24Terpinen-4-ol117711750.17 ± 0.000.23 ± 0.010.79 ± 0.020.70 ± 0.09GC, GC-MS
25α-Terpineol118811885.13 ± 0.101.80 ± 0.180.15 ± 0.011.15 ± 0.07GC, GC-MS
26Thymol methyl ether123512370.18 ± 0.01--5.10 ± 0.25GC-MS
27Carvacrol methyl ether124412471.53 ± 0.02--0.30 ± 0.02GC-MS
28Linalool acetate1257125665.27 ± 0.72---GC, GC-MS
29Bornyl acetate12881289-2.74 ± 0.190.10 ± 0.00-GC, GC-MS
30Thymol 129012710.76 ± 0.18-0.18 ± 0.0331.67 ± 0.97GC, GC-MS
31Carvacrol129913070.23 ± 0.06-54.74 ± 0.7814.39 ± 0.68GC, GC-MS
324′-methoxy acetophenone13501349- 0.09 ± 0.00--GC-MS
33Thymol Acetate13551357---1.63 ± 0.05GS-MS
34Carvacrol acetate13721376--15.22 ± 0.38-GC-MS
35α-Copaene137613800.12 ± 0.010.48 ± 0.00--GC-MS
36Geranyl acetate138113850.25 ± 0.01---GC, GC-MS
37β-Boubonene138813880.15 ± 0.01---GC-MS
38β-Caryophyllene140814063.87 ± 0.096.46 ± 0.1412.58 ± 0.595.18 ± 0.51GC, GC-MS
39β-Cedrene14201417-0.11 ± 0.00--GC-MS
40Aromadendrene14411428--0.13 ± 0.01-GC-MS
41α-Humulene145414450.42 ± 0.04-0.25 ± 0.000.50 ± 0.11GC-MS
42Allo-aromandrene14611453--0.10 ± 0.00-GC-MS
43γ-Muurolene147914762.36 ± 0.120.38 ± 0.02--GC-MS
44Germacrene D14801475---0.56 ± 0.02GC-MS
45cis-β-Guaine14931491-0.15 ± 0.00--GC-MS
46Bicyclogermacrene14941492--1.32 ± 0.070.33 ± 0.01GC-MS
47α-Muurolene15001499-0.09 ± 0.00--GC-MS
48β-Bisabolene150515110.99 ± 0.09-0.99 ± 0.062.90 ± 0.17GC-MS
49γ-Cadinene15131510-0.28 ± 0.00--GC-MS
50δ-Cadinene15231521-0.68 ± 0.00--GC-MS
51Caryophyllene oxide158315690.50 ± 0.020.35 ± 0.002.27 ± 0.31-GC-MS
1 Components are reported according to their elution order on a polar column; 2 KI from the literature; 3 KI measured on a polar column; 4 identification method. OV, Origanum vulgare subsp. viridulum (Martrin-Donos) Nyman; SR, Salvia rosmarinus Schleid; TC, Thymus capitatus Hoffmanns. and Link; TL, Thymus longicaulis C.Presl.
Table 2. Percentage and standard deviation (±) of V. destractor neutralization after treatments.
Table 2. Percentage and standard deviation (±) of V. destractor neutralization after treatments.
Concentration
mg/mL
O. vulgare viridulum
Mortality %
T. capitatus
Mortality %
T. longicaulis
Mortality %
S. rosmarinus
Mortality %
Acetone
Mortality %
Amitraz
Mortality %
0.5 mg86 (±13)88 (±14)84 (±13)26 (±19)2 S (±6)60 (±14)
1 mg90 (±11)88 (±11)94 (±10)34 (±25)67 (±3)
2 mg94 (±10)92 (±10)94 (±10)38 (±15)93 (±10)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bava, R.; Castagna, F.; Lupia, C.; Ruga, S.; Musella, V.; Conforti, F.; Marrelli, M.; Argentieri, M.P.; Britti, D.; Statti, G.; et al. Chemical Profile of Essential Oils of Selected Lamiaceae Plants and In Vitro Activity for Varroosis Control in Honeybees (Apis mellifera). Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120701

AMA Style

Bava R, Castagna F, Lupia C, Ruga S, Musella V, Conforti F, Marrelli M, Argentieri MP, Britti D, Statti G, et al. Chemical Profile of Essential Oils of Selected Lamiaceae Plants and In Vitro Activity for Varroosis Control in Honeybees (Apis mellifera). Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(12):701. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bava, Roberto, Fabio Castagna, Carmine Lupia, Stefano Ruga, Vincenzo Musella, Filomena Conforti, Mariangela Marrelli, Maria Pia Argentieri, Domenico Britti, Giancarlo Statti, and et al. 2023. "Chemical Profile of Essential Oils of Selected Lamiaceae Plants and In Vitro Activity for Varroosis Control in Honeybees (Apis mellifera)" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 12: 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10120701

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop