Next Article in Journal
Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Relationships of Honey Bee-Associated Viruses in Bee Products
Previous Article in Journal
Localization of β-Nerve Growth Factor in the Stallion Reproductive Tract
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials in Veterinary Medicine and Ophthalmology: A Review of Clinical Cases and Experimental Studies

by
Fabio Leonardi
1,
Barbara Simonazzi
1,*,
Filippo Maria Martini
1,
Pasquale D’Angelo
2,
Ruben Foresti
2,3,4 and
Maddalena Botti
1,2
1
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
2
CNR-IMEM, Italian National Research Council, Institute of Materials for Electronics and Magnetism, 43126 Parma, Italy
3
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43123 Parma, Italy
4
CERT, Center of Excellence for Toxicological Research, 43123 Parma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2024, 11(8), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080368
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 8 August 2024 / Accepted: 10 August 2024 / Published: 12 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Biomedical Sciences)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Three-dimensional printing technology is a method of creating a three-dimensional object layer by layer using a computer-generated design. This method has enabled the production of custom models of organs or organ parts, leading to the emergence of “personalized medicine”. The materials used in 3D printing include plastic, metal, and polymers. This review discusses the current state and future prospects of six biomaterials used in veterinary medicine and ophthalmology. Polycaprolactone is suitable for replacing hard tissue defects and is well tolerated in the eye, making it useful for ocular drug delivery devices. Pluronic is used for bone tissue engineering applications and could also be employed for drug delivery in ophthalmology. Silk is used for composite osteogenic scaffolds and vascular grafts, and it may be tested for creating protective lenses for the eye. Collagen is used to produce bioengineered corneas to improve the treatment of corneal ulcers. Alginate is used in cardiac and orthopedic procedures and is also employed in various ocular delivery systems for corneal repair. Hyaluronic acid is commonly used as a lubricant and can serve as a regenerative scaffold during the corneal healing process.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in 3D printing technology within the field of bioengineering. This technology offers the ability to create devices with intricate macro- and micro-geometries, as well as specific models. It has particularly gained attention for its potential in personalized medicine, allowing for the production of organ or tissue models tailored to individual patient needs. Further, 3D printing has opened up possibilities to manufacture structures that can substitute, complement, or enhance damaged or dysfunctional organic parts. To apply 3D printing in the medical field, researchers have studied various materials known as biomaterials, each with distinct chemical and physical characteristics. These materials fall into two main categories: hard and soft materials. Each biomaterial needs to possess specific characteristics that are compatible with biological systems, ensuring long-term stability and biocompatibility. In this paper, we aim to review some of the materials used in the biomedical field, with a particular focus on those utilized in veterinary medicine and ophthalmology. We will discuss the significant findings from recent scientific research, focusing on the biocompatibility, structure, applicability, and in vitro and in vivo biological characteristics of two hard and four soft materials. Additionally, we will present the current state and prospects of veterinary ophthalmology.

1. Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology can be used to produce biological tissues and organs through a process called bioprinting, which involves printing biochemical material and living cells to create three-dimensional biological structures. This technology is the result of interdisciplinary studies in the fields of biology, biomaterials, mechanical engineering, and 3D bioprinting. The ultimate goal is to be able to create custom tissues and organs by laying down suitable biomaterials layer by layer. This could allow for the production of organ models tailored to individual patient needs, potentially leading to personalized medicine.
The materials used in 3D printing can be categorized as hard or soft. Hard materials include thermoplastic polymers, ceramics, and metals, while soft materials include hydrogels and hydrophilic polymers. Soft materials are capable of absorbing large amounts of water and can promote the formation of new tissues due to their permeability to nutrients.
This review aims to evaluate two hard and four soft substances, considering their characteristics and previous uses, particularly in veterinary medicine, to determine their suitability for 3D-printed protective lenses or for enhancing existing lenses with micro- or nano-chambers for controlled and programmed drug release [1,2].

2. Hard Materials

2.1. Polycaprolactone

PCL (ε-caprolactone) is a synthetic polyester polymer that has garnered considerable attention due to its great potential in biomedical applications. Among synthetic polymers, PCL stands out as one of the easiest to process and manipulate into various shapes and sizes thanks to its low melting temperature and superior viscoelastic properties. It boasts excellent mechanical properties, such as rubberiness, making it easy to modulate, and degrades slowly over several months to years [3]. PCL also exhibits good biocompatibility and bioactivity and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as non-toxic, allowing for its use in various human applications, including sutures, micro- and nano-devices for drug delivery, and adhesion barriers [4,5].
PCL has found extensive use as a scaffold in tissue engineering for bone, cartilage, tendon and ligament, blood vessels, and skin reconstruction (Figure 1). Its characteristics have made it the ideal material for the fabrication of scaffolds aimed at regenerating hard tissues, such as the femurs of goats [6], repair of partial sternal defects [7], scapula cortical bone removal [8], and mandible defects in dogs [9]. Studies have shown that PCL demonstrates good bone regeneration performance in dog models [10].
PCL has also gained interest in ophthalmology for the development of ocular implants and drug delivery systems (Figure 1). Bernards et al. showed that micro- and nano-engineered PCL can retain its structural conformation and integrity when placed in the eye, marking an important development in the field [11]. Irani et al. demonstrated that PCL is a versatile material. It has been successfully used for drug delivery and in in vitro studies, including those carried out on corneal endothelial cells of bovine [12,13] and humans [14,15,16,17]. These studies have documented the remarkable potential of PCL in the field of tissue engineering. In rat eyes, PCL has shown the ability to be loaded with growth factors and promote the regeneration and growth of ocular epithelial cells. It can also remain attached to the cornea, suggesting its potential use in the treatment of ocular surface disease [18]. In rabbits, PCL drug delivery devices containing hypotensive [19] or antimetabolite [20] agents are biocompatible and efficiently distribute the drug in ocular tissues [11]. Furthermore, in dogs, PCL custom-made prostheses and ocular implants developed using 3D-printing technology have yielded positive results. The artificial eye was aesthetically pleasing, and its use has not led to significant complications.

2.2. Pluronic

Pluronics are an important class of biomedical polymers that undergo a reversible gel–sol transition in aqueous solutions at physiological temperature and pH [21,22]. This transition is influenced by the molecular weight and concentration of each polymeric constituent. Pluronics are commonly used in tissue engineering, although they have the drawback of degrading quickly in vivo. To address this, they are often cross-linked with other substances such as α-hydroxy or amino acids to modify their chemical structure.
In terms of applications, pluronics are known to inhibit surface-tissue adhesion for many cell types [22]. They have been successfully used in scaffolding applications involving in vitro hematopoietic stem cells and lung tissue [23]. Additionally, various studies showed that pluronics can serve as a potential drug delivery system [24,25,26] and have applications in rabbit ophthalmology [27] (Figure 2).
Among these polymers, pluronic F-127 (poloxamer 407) is a synthetic hydrogel consisting of units of ethylene oxide (PEO) and polypropylene oxide (PPO) that has been approved by the FDA for drug delivery applications in recent years [28]. It has good properties: it is non-toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable; it has a reversible mechanism of gelation [29] and is thermosensitive. This property enables it to hold encapsulated cells in its structure and to promote initial cell adhesion inside the defect site [30,31]. Moreover, pluronic F-127 can enhance cell attachment, collagen formation, and angiogenesis [32,33].
Additionally, in vitro studies have documented that pluronic F-127 hydrogel is a good substance for tissue engineering [34], as it can be used for the immobilization of dental mesenchymal cells and the healing of cartilage or bone tissues in pigs [35] (Figure 2).
Unfortunately, to our knowledge, pluronic has not been specifically used in the ophthalmic field. However, its biocompatibility, ease of preparation, mechanical stability, antibacterial effect, and ability to incorporate different substances with pharmacological activity and promote their release [36] make it a matrix that should also be investigated for ophthalmological drug delivery use.

3. Soft Materials

3.1. Silk

Silk is a biopolymer consisting of two distinct proteins, fibroin and sericin. In Bombyx mori cocoons, fibroin makes up about 70 to 80 wt.% and is commonly used in the textile industry and medicine after degumming [37]. The high mechanical strength of fibroin is due to the antiparallel alignment of β-sheets in its protein structure, as well as its hydrophilic and hydrophobic blocks in a semi-crystalline polymer matrix, self-cooling ability, and lack of inflammatory responses in humans [38]. Sericin is also used in biomedical systems for its high moisture, oxidation resistance, and protection against UV radiation [39]. Both silk proteins have been utilized to enhance the physical properties and biocompatibility of various materials in different ways and forms (e.g., in vivo modification, regeneration, or post-treatment).
Silk fibers (SFs) are employed to create various dimensional systems, such as films, nano- or micro-spheres, or electrospun fibers [40]. This is feasible because silk possesses high mechanical strength, controllable degradation, manufacturing flexibility, and good biocompatibility [41,42]. Consequently, it is primarily used for biological applications, such as medical sutures, tissue regeneration [43], drug delivery systems, and for designing biosensors and wearable electronics [44,45,46] (Figure 3).
SF has been studied for the production of various biomaterials for wound healing, such as films, nanofibrous matrices, and 3D porous scaffolds. SF has been used alone or combined with other biomaterials, like polyethylene glycol, keratin, and collagen. It has also been bio-functionalized for wound repair, stabilization of molecules, maintenance of bioactivity, and drug delivery systems [47,48]. SF has excellent properties as a drug carrier, enabling delayed release in therapeutic protocols.
The excellent biomodulating properties of SF make it a great substrate for bone tissue engineering applications. In vivo studies showed SF osteogenic potential in rats [49]. SF scaffolds have been successfully used for repairing bony defects, such as canine mandibular border defects [50]. Composite scaffolds with osteogenic potential and the ability to mimic the natural bone environment were created by combining SF with other biomaterials like hyaluronic acid. SF scaffolds can be produced in different forms as follows: injectable and printable gels, porous sponges, and electrospun 2D and 3D constructs.
SF has also been tested in the vascular field. Since the implantation of artificial SF vascular grafts in the femoral arteries of dogs, the high patency and remodeling ability of these SF grafts have been documented [51], which could be applied in small-diameter (<6 mm) vessels. The implantation of SF vascular grafts in the abdominal aorta of dogs has shown rapid endothelialization and a tendency to form thin luminal layers [52] (Figure 3).
While not extensively tested in the ophthalmic field like pluronics, SF’s versatility and biocompatibility with both hard and soft tissues make it suitable for use in this field for the creation of protective lenses for veterinary use or the functionalization of existing lenses.

3.2. Collagen

Collagen is a key component of the extracellular matrix found in various connective tissues, such as bone, cartilage, cornea, veins, arteries, and skin. It helps maintain tissue integrity [53], provides transparency to the cornea and crystalline lens of the eye, and is primarily composed of collagen type I and collagen type IV [54]. Collagen is widely used in corneal bioengineering due to its safety, flexibility, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low antigenicity. It can form a transparent colloidal solution, and collagen-based nanoparticles are used for topical drug release. However, a drawback of collagen is its lack of mechanical toughness and elasticity, but research has focused on addressing this through collagen cross-linking [55].
The biocompatibility of human collagen type IV has been demonstrated in dogs since the 1980s with intracorneal implants [56], and animal-derived collagen has been utilized for scaffold fabrication and biocompatibility evaluation [53].
Collagen has been used for shields, lenses, hydrogels, and keratoplasty. Collagen shields have been used for ocular surface protection in humans and rabbits in the case of corneal wounds [57]. It has been demonstrated that the collagen shield is a useful drug reservoir because it can prolong the contact time between the cornea and the substance and promote drug delivery to the eye. Many studies showed that collagen shields could be easily used to deliver antibiotics, antivirals, analgesics, and immuno-suppressive drugs to the eye. Collagen shields were effective in delivering tobramycin, fluoroquinolones, cyclosporine, and eplerenone to the eyes of rabbits [58,59,60,61,62]. In a mouse model, collagen discs effectively released and reduced viral replication [63].
Several studies in animal models showed that cross-linking collagen used for corneal lens transplantation can significantly enhance corneal biological and mechanical properties, increasing corneal resistance to tension [64,65]. Recently, the antibiotic release capacity of anionic collagen/polyvinyl alcohol membranes was found to be superior to soft contact lenses and collagen shields. These findings suggest that collagen/polyvinyl alcohol membranes would improve the treatment of corneal lesions in domestic animals, increasing patient welfare [66].
Collagen hydrogels are considered a promising method for corneal wound healing. These hydrogels can support cell growth, facilitate gas exchange, release nutrients and drugs, and remove waste products [67]. In guinea pigs, collagen was safely used for implanting gel into the cornea [68]. In a rabbit experimental model, type I collagen hydrogel with azide and dibenzocyclooctyne successfully promoted corneal re-epithelization [69]. A collagen-based hydrogel loaded with a neuro-regenerative drug effectively replaced a large corneal defect in rabbits, also promoting nerve regeneration [70]. Additionally, cross-linked collagen gel can be used to produce 3D structures ideal for corneal cell growth [55].
Bioengineered corneas should closely resemble natural corneal structures. In a rabbit model, stabilized recombinant human collagen-phosphorylcholine implants promoted corneal cell and nerve repopulation in cases of corneal damage caused by alkali exposure. It has been demonstrated that enzyme-resistant biosynthetic substitutes for allogeneic tissue may be a valid alternative for cases requiring treatment by keratoplasty [71]. An acellular non-cross-linked collagen-based scaffold was transparent, non-immunogenic, and biocompatible for anterior lamellar keratoplasty in a rabbit model [72] (Figure 4).
Atelocollagen, a type of collagen with low antigenicity, has previously been used for treating skin and mucous membrane diseases. In dogs, atelocollagen has been used as a scaffold for keratocyte proliferation, promoting re-epithelization and accelerating corneal wound healing without rejection and inflammation [73].

3.3. Alginate

Alginate is a polysaccharide composed of β-D-mannuronic acid (M block) and α-L-glucuronic acid (G block) blocks. Alginate with a high M block is more flexible and elastic but also more immunogenic [74]. Commercially available alginate is obtained by treating the cell walls of brown algae (class Phaeophyceae) with sodium hydroxide. The molecular weight of available alginate varies from 32,000 to 400,000 g/mol. Alginate with high molecular weight shows better physical and biological properties. Alginate has several advantages: it is non-toxic, biodegradable, transparent, low immunogenic, inexpensive, and rapidly gelling [74]. Alginate is an ideal drug carrier due to its mucoadhesiveness and penetration properties [75].
Alginate is an interesting biomaterial useful for regenerative medicine because it promotes cell growth and exhibits significant cross-link ability and biocompatibility. Alginate can be used with other biological components to promote cellular growth and adhesion [74]. Unfortunately, alginate hydrogels dissolve uncontrollably, release alginate strands, and are unable to endure heavy loads due to their poor mechanical strength and high swelling rate [76]. Furthermore, alginate with high molecular weight is slowly metabolized by mammals, but the sodium periodate oxidation of alginate allows it to degrade in a controlled manner [77].
Alginate is usually combined with various biomaterials to improve biomechanical properties for producing tissue-like devices. Alginate constructs combined with gelatin, cellulose, silk, and hyaluronic acid have been successfully used for 3D-printed multilayered structures for long-term culture [74].
Alginate has been used in various cell delivery-based approaches for corneal repair. Oxidized alginate gels have served as useful corneal wound healing bandages. In situ, alginate/chitosan hydrogel has been employed as a limbal stem cell transplanting scaffold for corneal reconstruction following serious corneal alkali burn wounds in rabbits [78]. Another in situ forming composite non-toxic, histocompatible, and rapidly biodegradable hydrogel based on sodium alginate dialdehyde and chitosan was able to reconstruct the engineered corneal endothelium in rabbits [79]. Alginate has been recently used to produce ion-activated bioadhesive hydrogel composed of natural corneal extracellular matrix. Alginate enabled ion-activated hydrogel desirable transparency, biocompatibility, and robust adhesion. This transparent hydrogel, combined with a soft contact lens, rapidly restored normal corneal curvature, allowed for fast corneal re-epithelization, and promoted nerve regeneration [80].
Alginate may be employed as an ocular delivery system, either alone or in combination with other biomaterials, thanks to its mucoadhesiveness, penetration enhancer, and gelification properties, which allow for predictable drug release [74]. Alginate-based multilayers are widely used to control drug release from ophthalmic lenses in humans [81,82]. In rats, thiolated chitosan prepared with sodium alginate nanoparticles delivered large amounts of drugs into the cornea [83]. In rats and mice, alginate-gelatin hydrogel-loaded nanoceria was effective in preventing choroidal neovascularization, neurodegeneration, and protecting the retina from oxidative damage [84].
Numerous studies have explored the use of alginate as a drug delivery system in rabbits. It has been observed that ophthalmic alginate gels and films increased the ocular miotic response compared to pilocarpine drops [85]. Two experimental designs optimized an ophthalmic in situ gelling method to deliver moxifloxacin for treating various ocular infections, ensuring drug release for up to 12 h without local side effects in rabbits [86,87,88]. Furthermore, a multilayered sodium alginate-chitosan hydrogel encapsulated timolol maleate and levofloxacin, serving as a drug delivery system for the treatment of experimentally induced glaucoma in rabbits [89]. Alginate has also been used as a drug delivery system to treat bacterial keratitis. For instance, alginate coated with polycaprolactone/polyethylene glycol fibrous inserts increased the adhesion of the besifloxacin complex [90].
Notably, alginate administered orally could be a useful treatment for certain ophthalmic diseases. For instance, alginate oligosaccharide, administered by gastrogavage for four weeks, prevented experimentally induced cataracts in C57BL/6J mice by reducing oxidative damage [91].
In addition to its medical applications, alginate can also be used for the storage and transport of various cellular types (e.g., human corneal epithelial cells) [92].
Alginate has been experimentally utilized in animals as a biomaterial for cardiosurgery, orthopedic procedures, and the treatment of endocrine disorders. Sodium alginate was impregnated into a porous polyester vascular graft, which was successfully implanted in the aorta of mongrel dogs [93]. In dogs, alginate has been employed for mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblast cultures for use in the repair of bone defects [94]. Additionally, alginate combined with poly-L-lactic acid has been used to produce a specific porous scaffold for the repair of osteochondral defects in the canine vertebrae. This system exhibited good osteointegration combined with new bone tissue formation and no inflammatory side effects [95] (Figure 5). Furthermore, chitosan-alginate capsules were found to be safe and biocompatible when used for xenogeneic and allogeneic islet transplantations in a canine model of diabetes [96].

3.4. Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural non-sulfated polyanionic polysaccharide found in the extracellular matrix of various tissues [97]. It possesses biodegradable, biocompatible, atoxic, viscoelastic, and bioadhesive properties, with a molecular weight ranging from 1000 to 10,000,000 Da. HA plays a crucial role in cell attachment, migration, differentiation, development, and angiogenesis. It can regulate intracellular signaling and cell behaviors through interaction with specific cellular receptors [98]. Clinically, HA can be used for tissue regeneration and cell therapies. It can be used as tissue fillers, drug carriers, or tissue engineering scaffolds in medical specialties, such as wound healing, cartilage tissue repair, and ophthalmology (Figure 6).
Due to its viscoelastic and hydrophilic properties, HA is commonly used as a lubricant in artificial tears for treating dry eyes and accelerating healing after surgery or trauma by binding with corneal epithelial cell CD44 receptors. Furthermore, HA reduces inflammatory mediators and improves the protection of cells from oxidative damage [75,99]. HA hydrogel reduces inflammation and can be used as a regenerative scaffold to accelerate wound and corneal healing [100]. In corneal injury, HA served as a component of a tissue filler material promoting corneal epithelial cell growth without hyperplasia and stromal myofibroblast formation in a rabbit model [101]. Additionally, studies showed that HA aids in the healing and quality of corneal lesions, as well as being a successful physical barrier in the therapy of corneal epitheliopathies in rabbits, dogs, cats, and horses [102,103,104,105]. HA/chitosan/gelatin hydrogel has been shown to promote rapid corneal re-epithelization in a rabbit model of alkali-induced corneal damage [106]. Furthermore, the recovery of normal corneal endothelium has been demonstrated after the transplantation of HA cell-loaded hydrogels to rabbits with corneal endothelium dysfunction [107].
In ophthalmic surgery, HA is employed in cornea tissue engineering due to its biological stability, biodegradability, and permeability of nutrients. However, its low stability may pose drawbacks in cornea tissue engineering [75]. HA can establish and maintain comfortable conditions to promote healing of the postsurgical area, minimize the risk of adhesions, decrease oxidative damage, and normalize intraocular pressure [108]. Studies have also shown that HA-based microcarriers enhance corneal stromal regeneration in a rabbit model of corneal alkali burn injury, achieving corneal healing after intracorneal injection of keratocytes/functionalized HA-based oxidized microcarriers [109].
Moreover, HA is utilized as a stem cell culturing system, and it enhances stem cell proliferation. Nanofibers of HA scaffolds are used to support or grow mesenchymal stem cells directly on them. The introduction of different cross-linking networks has also allowed HA gels to be more conducive to stem cell differentiation [108].
Numerous studies have focused on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) scaffolds for corneal healing, particularly as cell delivery vehicles. Porcine stem cells loaded into the HA hydrogel vehicle showed promising differentiation, adhesion, and proliferation abilities. Additionally, HA hydrogel loaded with dopamine demonstrated improved adhesiveness and increased cell viability [110]. In in vivo studies on rabbits, the cornea implant surface was enhanced with different molecular weights of HA, leading to a significant increase in the number of keratocytes [75].
It has been demonstrated that biocompatible HA hydrogels with large microporosities can be effectively used as scaffold systems for the treatment of various endothelial corneal dysfunctions because they allow for nutrient permeation [109]. An in vivo study reported that implanting endothelium cells/HA devices in the anterior chamber was clinically suitable for treating corneal wounds but might cause some inflammatory side effects [111]. Highly oxidized cell/HA systems successfully restored the physiological collagenous structure after 4 weeks in a rabbit model. It is well known that oxidation promotes cell proliferation and adhesion, facilitating a more rapid restoration of physiological tissue conditions. Furthermore, HA microgels may be useful systems for bioactive delivery, injectable fillers, and 3D bioprinting [109].
Drug delivery through soft contact lenses (SCLs) is a feasible method. HA is safely used in the structure of silicone SCL without affecting the optical properties. HA promotes physiologic blinking, increases drug residence time on ocular tissue by reducing tear outflow, and prevents protein adhesion to the SCL surface. An in vivo study in a rabbit model with dry eye syndrome demonstrated that SCL released HA into the rabbit eyes for 2 weeks, promoting fast healing [112]. Poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/β-cyclodextrin-HA hydrogel has proven to be useful as an SCL material for conjunctivitis treatment in rabbits. These SCLs showed good oxygen permeability and flexibility, reduced the adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus, and enhanced drug delivery [113].
SCL constructed with HA and loaded with ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone released an adequate amount of antibiotic [114]. The soaking technique and direct entrapment were tested to load HA in SCLs. In an in vivo study in rabbits, direct entrapment was superior to the soaking method in terms of HA quantitative release and residence times [115].
HA can be cross-linked or conjugated with various biomaterials for controlled-release formulations, and it can effectively encapsulate many drugs, even at the nanoscale [116]. Some ionic complexes between HA and various drugs have been shown to prolong ocular residence time. The advantageous rheological and mucoadhesive properties of HA loaded with 0.5% timolol prolonged the drug’s residence time, preventing its removal due to blinking in normotensive rabbits [97]. Moreover, HA has been used in producing long-lasting ciprofloxacin and vancomycin release systems for postoperative therapy in ophthalmic surgery [117]. It was also combined with β-cyclodextrin to develop a delivery system loaded with corneal epithelial cells and dexamethasone [118]. Its carrier capacity has been demonstrated when conjugated with gold; in fact, HA increased the mobility of the gold nanoparticles and favored their binding to HA receptors in various cells of the porcine eye [119]. HA has been used to fabricate pliable eye bandages containing biodegradable microneedles for targeted ophthalmic medication administration in rats [120].

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The interest in biomaterials among researchers is continuously increasing. Many studies focus on therapeutic solutions for human beings, but research in veterinary medicine also aims to improve animal welfare.
This review summarizes the previous applications of various biomaterials in experimental, pre-clinical, and clinical studies, particularly in veterinary medicine and ophthalmology.
Some biomaterials, such as collagen and hyaluronic acid, are basic structural components of most tissues and play an essential role in maintaining the biological and structural integrity of the tissue architecture. Most biomaterials are easy to handle and could be used in tissue engineering. To encourage the clinical application of these systems, it is necessary to optimize production to provide an adequate imitation of biological functions. Therefore, natural and synthetic biomaterials should ensure a favorable environment for the cells.
The biomaterials examined in this review may be used in various medical areas, including ophthalmology. They can be employed in the form of gels, scaffolds, and 3D constructs and can be safely used as a growth substrate for many cells and as stroma substitutes [121,122,123,124]. The greatest interest is directed towards devices that can be used as drug or cell delivery systems.
Topical administration in the eye is usually based on ophthalmic drops, which require frequent instillation and cause discomfort for the patient. Important goals of future research could be to design biocompatible and well-tolerated SCLs specifically for drug delivery and to identify the most effective biomaterial for this purpose. SCLs are a more natural technique to administer ophthalmic drugs than eye drops, as they are near the cornea [125]. SCLs consist of hydrogel able to absorb a fixed volume of an aqueous vehicle, including drugs and nanoparticles inside a polymerizable monomer solution able to manage the related release and reduce side effects due to systemic absorption.
Therapeutic SCLs for drug delivery may overcome the main drawbacks of traditional eye drops, such as low drug bioavailability, low duration of action of the drug, low patient welfare, frequent drug administration, and systemic toxicity. Moreover, the drug released by the SCLs remains in the tear film for at least 30 min, allowing the drug to achieve therapeutic concentration in most of the cornea, demonstrating that the bioavailability increases to about 50% with SCLs [126].

Author Contributions

Data collection, equally contributed by all authors. Writing, equally contributed by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gong, C.Y.; Shi, S.; Dong, P.W.; Kan, B.; Gou, M.L.; Wang, X.H.; Li, X.Y.; Luo, F.; Zhao, X.; Wei, Y.Q.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of PEG-PCL-PEG thermosensitive hydrogel. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 365, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Orlando, I.; Roy, I. Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Wound Healing. In Cellulase-Based Superabsorbent Hydrogels; Mondal, M.H.H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 37, pp. 1131–1148. [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo, B.; Ma, P.X. Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: A brief review. Sci. China Chem. 2014, 57, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, L.; LaBarbera, D.V. 3D High-Content Screening of Organoids for Drug Discovery. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III; Chackalamannil, S., Rotella, D., Ward, S.E., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 388–415. [Google Scholar]
  5. Malikmammadov, E.; Tanir, T.E.; Kiziltay, A.; Hasirci, V.; Hasirci, N. PCL and PCL-based materials in biomedical applications. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 863–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chuenjitkuntaworn, B.; Osathanon, T.; Nowwarote, N.; Supaphol, P.; Pavasant, P. The efficacy of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold in combination with mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2016, 104, 264–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xuan, Y.; Tang, H.; Wu, B.; Ding, X.; Lu, Z.; Li, W.; Xu, Z. A specific groove design for individualized healing in a canine partial sternal defect model by a polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold coated with bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2014, 102A, 3401–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, S.J.; Kim, M.R.; Oh, J.S.; Han, I.; Shin, S.W. Effects of polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and dog mesenchymal stem cells on bone formation: Pilot study in dogs. Yonsei Med. J. 2009, 50, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rai, B.; Ho, K.Y.; Lei, Y.; Si-Hoe, K.M.; Teoh, C.M.J.; Yacob, K.B.; Chen, F.; Fooi-Chin, N.G.; Teoh, S.H. Polycaprolactone-20% tricalcium phosphate scaffolds in combination with Platelet-Rich plasma for the treatment of critical-sized defects of the mandible: A pilot study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2007, 65, 2195–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shim, J.H.; Won, J.Y.; Park, J.H.; Bae, J.H.; Ahn, G.; Kim, C.H.; Lim, D.H.; Cho, D.W.; Yun, W.S.; Bae, E.B.; et al. Effects of 3D-printed polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate membranes on guided bone regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bernards, D.A.; Bhisitkul, R.B.; Wynn, P.; Steedman, M.R.; Lee, O.T.; Wong, F.; Thoongsuwan, S.; Desai, T.A. Ocular biocompatibility and structural integrity of micro- and nanostructured poly(caprolactone) films. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 29, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, T.J.; Wang, I.J.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.H.; Young, T.H. The phenotypic response of bovine corneal endothelial cells on chitosan/polycaprolactone blends. Colloids Surf. B 2012, 90, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Young, T.H.; Wang, I.J.; Hub, F.R.; Wang, T.J. Fabrication of a bioengineered corneal endothelial cell sheet using chitosan/polycaprolactone blend membranes. Colloids Surf. B 2014, 116, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kruse, M.; Walter, P.; Bauer, B.; Rütten, S.; Schaefer, K.; Plange, N.; Gries, T.; Jockenhoevel, S.; Fuest, M. Electrospun membranes as scaffolds for human corneal endothelial cells. Curr. Eye Res. 2018, 43, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Himmler, M.; Garreis, F.; Paulsen, F.; Schubert, D.K.; Fuchsluger, T.A. Optimization of polycaprolactone—Based nanofiber matrices for the cultivation of corneal endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tayebi, T.; Baradaran-Rafi, A.; Hajifathali, A.; Rahimpour, A.; Zali, H.; Shaabani, A.; Niknejad, H. Biofabrication of chitosan/chitosan nanoparticles/polycaprolactone transparent membrane for corneal endothelial tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharifi, S.; Sharifi, H. Electrospun-reinforced suturable biodegradable artificial cornea. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 5716–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Irani, Y.D.; Tian, Y.; Wang, M.; Klebe, S.; McInnes, S.J.; Voelcker, N.H.; Coffer, J.L.; Williams, K.A. A novel pressed porous silicon-polycaprolactone composite as a dual purpose implant for the delivery of cells and drugs to the eye. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 139, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, J.; Kudisch, M.; Mudumba, S.; Asada, H.; Aya-Shibuya, E.; Bhisitkul, R.B.; Desai, T.A. Biocompatibility and pharmacokinetic analysis of an intracameral polycaprolactone drug delivery implant for glaucoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016, 57, 4342–4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bi, X.Z.; Pan, W.H.; Yu, X.P.; Song, Z.M.; Ren, Z.J.; Sun, M.; Li, C.H.; Nan, K.A. Application of 5-fluorouracilpolycaprolactone sustained-release film in ahmed glaucoma valve implantation inhibits postoperative bleb scarring in rabbit eyes. PLoS ONE 2015, 18, e0141467. [Google Scholar]
  21. Park, S.Y.; An, J.H.; Kwon, H.; Choi, S.Y.; Lim, K.Y.; Kwak, H.H.; Hussein, K.Y.; Woo, H.M.; Park, K.M. Custom-made artificial eyes using 3D printing for dogs: A preliminary study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Klouda, L.; Mikos, A.G. Thermoresponsive hydrogels in biomedical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2008, 68, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cortiella, J.; Nichols, J.E.; Kojima, K.; Bonassar, L.J.; Dargon, P.; Roy, A.K.; Vacant, M.P.; Niles, J.A.; Vacanti, C.A. Tissue-engineered lung: An in vivo and in vitro comparison of polyglycolic acid and pluronic F-127 hydrogel/somatic lung progenitor cell constructs to support tissue growth. Tissue Eng. 2006, 12, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hao, J.; Tong, T.; Jin, K.; Zhuang, Q.; Han, T.; Bi, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Folic acid-functionalized drug delivery platform of resveratrol based on Pluronic 127/D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate mixed micelles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2279–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, S.; Minhas, M.U.; Ahmad, M.; Sohail, M. Self-assembled supramolecular thermoreversible β-cyclodextrin/ethylene glycol injectable hydrogels with difunctional Pluronic® 127 as controlled delivery depot of curcumin. Development, characterization and in vitro evaluation. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Song, Z.; Sun, J.; Deng, P.; Zhou, F.; Xu, H.; Wen, Y.; Teng, F.; Ge, D.; Feng, R. Oligochitosan-pluronic 127 conjugate for delivery of honokiol. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, S740–S750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arafa, M.G.; Girgis, G.N.S.; El-Dahan, M.S. Chitosan-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles for Enhanced Ocular Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy of Atorvastatin Calcium. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 1335–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ganguly, R.; Verma, G.; Ingle, A.; Kumar, S.; Sarma, H.D.; Dutta, D.; Dutta, B.; Kunwar, A.; Ajish, K.; Bhainsa, K.C.; et al. Structural, rheological and therapeutic properties of pluronic F127 hydrogel and beeswax based lavender oil ointment formulations. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 365, 120157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schmolka, I.R. Artificial skin. I. Preparation and properties of pluronic F-127 gels for treatment of burns. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1972, 6, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, J.W.; Chen, W.J.; Liao, S.K.; Yang, C.Y.; Lin, S.S.; Wu, C.C. Osteoblastic differentiation of rabbit mesenchymal stem cells loaded in a carrier system of Pluronic F127 and interpore. Chang. Gung. Med. J. 2006, 29, 363–372. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, W.J.; Huang, J.W.; Niu, C.C.; Chen, L.H.; Yuan, L.J.; Lai, P.L.; Yang, C.Y.; Lin, S.S. Use of fluorescence labeled mesenchymal stem cells in pluronic F127 and porous hydroxyapatite as a bone substitute for posterolateral spinal fusion. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27, 1631–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fowler, E.B.; Cuenin, M.F.; Hokett, S.D.; Peacock, M.E.; McPherson, J.C., 3rd; Dirksen, T.R.; Sharawi, M.; Billman, M.A. Evaluation of pluronic polyols as carriers for grafting materials: Study in rat calvaria defects. J. Periodontol. 2002, 73, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bensaid, W.; Triffitt, J.T.; Blanchat, C.; Oudina, K.; Sedel, L.; Petite, H. A biodegradable fibrin scaffold for mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 2497–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Diniz, I.M.A.; Chen, C.; Xu, X.; Ansari, S.; Zadeh, H.H.; Marques, M.M.; Shi, S.; Moshaverinia, A. Pluronic F-127 hydrogel as a promising scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2015, 26, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saim, A.B.; Cao, Y.; Weng, Y.; Chang, C.N.; Vacanti, M.A.; Vacanti, C.A.; Eavey, R.D. Engineering autogenous cartilage in the shape of a helix using an injectable hydrogel scaffold. Laryngoscope 2000, 110, 1694–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pelegrino, M.T.; de Araujo Lima, B.; do Nascimento, M.H.M.; Lombello, C.B.; Brocchi, M.; Seabra, A.B. Biocompatible and antibacterial nitric oxide-releasing Pluronic F-127/Chitosan hydrogel for topical applications. Polymers 2018, 10, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, C.; Xia, K.; Zhang, Y.; Kaplan, D.L. Silk-based advanced materials for soft electronics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 2916–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Holland, C.; Numata, K.; Rnjak-Kovacina, J.; Seib, F.P. The biomedical use of silk: Past, present, future. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1800465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, J.P.; Alam, S.; Jain, A.K.; Ansari, K.M.; Mandal, B.B. Protective activity of silk sericin against UV radiation-induced skin damage by downregulating oxidative stress. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 1, 2120–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Badawy, I.M.; Ali, B.A.; Abbas, W.A.; Allam, N.K. Natural silk for energy and sensing applications: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2141–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Meinel, L.; Karageorgiou, V.; Hofmann, S.; Fajardo, R.; Snyder, B.; Li, C.; Zichner, L.; Langer, R.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G.; Kaplan, D.L. Engineering bone-like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2004, 71, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Milazzo, M.; Contessi Negrini, N.; Scialla, S.; Marelli, B.; Farè, S.; Danti, S.; Buehler, M.J. Additive manufacturing approaches for hydroxyapatite reinforced composites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1903055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghezzi, C.E.; Marelli, B.; Donelli, I.; Alessandrino, A.; Freddi, G.; Nazhat, S.N. Multilayered dense collagen-silk fibroin hybrid: A platform for mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 11, 2046–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koh, L.D.; Cheng, Y.; Teng, C.P.; Khin, Y.W.; Loh, X.J.; Tee, S.Y.; Low, M.; Ye, E.; Yu, H.D.; Zhang, Y.W.; et al. Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 46, 86–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ribeiro, V.P.; Silva-Correia, J.; Gonçalves, C.; Pina, S.; Radhouani, H.; Montonen, T.; Hyttinen, J.; Roy, A.; Oliveira, A.L.; Reis, R.L.; et al. Rapidly responsive silk fibroin hydrogels as an artificial matrix for the programmed tumor cells death. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mauney, J.R.; Nguyen, T.; Gillen, K.; Kirker-Head, C.; Gimble, J.M.; Kaplan, D.L. Engineering adipose-like tissue in vitro and in vivo utilizing human bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 5280–5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chouhan, D.; Mandal, B.B. Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to bedside. Acta Biomater. 2020, 103, 24–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, M.; Huang, S.; Ye, X.; Ruan, J.; Zhao, S.; Ye, J.; Zhong, B. Human epidermal growth factor functionalized cocoon silk with improved cell proliferation activity for the fabrication of wound dressings. J. Biomater. Appl. 2021, 36, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Farokhi, M.; Mottaghitalabb, F.; Fatahi, Y.; Reza Saeb, M.; Zarrintaj, P.; Kundu, S.C.; Khademhosseini, A. Silk fibroin scaffolds for common cartilage injuries: Possibilities for future clinical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 115, 251–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S.; Sun, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Kaplan, D.L.; Jiang, X. Apatite-coated silk fibroin scaffolds to healing mandibular border defects in canines. Bone 2009, 45, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, R.; Ogawa, Y.; Takagi, Y.; Sata, M.; Asakura, T. Evaluation of small-diameter silk vascular grafts implanted in dogs. JTCVS Open 2021, 4, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yamamoto, S.; Okamoto, H.; Haga, M.; Shigematsu, K.; Miyata, T.; Watanabe, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Takagi, Y.; Asakura, T. Rapid endothelialization and thin luminal layers in vascular grafts using silk fibroin. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 7, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cen, L.; Liu, W.; Zhang, W.; Cao, Y. Collagen tissue engineering: Development of novel biomaterials and applications. Pediatr. Res. 2008, 63, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Song, Y.; Overmass, M.; Fan, J.; Hodge, C.; Sutton, G.; Lovicu, F.J.; You, J. Application of collagen I and IV in bioengineering transparent ocular tissues. Front. Surg. 2021, 8, 639500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, Z.; You, J.; Liu, X.; Cooper, S.; Hodge, C.; Sutton, G.; Crook, J.M.; Wallace, G.G. Biomaterials for corneal bioengineering. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 13, 032002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dupont, D.; Gravagna, P.; Albinet, P.; Tayot, J.L.; Romanet, J.P.; Mouillon, M.; Eloy, R. Biocompatibility of human collagen type IV intracorneal implants. Cornea 1989, 8, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Simşek, N.A.; Ay, G.M.; Tugal-Tutkun, I.; Başar, D.; Bilgin, L.K. An experimental study on the effect of collagen shields and therapeutic contact lenses on corneal wound healing. Cornea 1996, 15, 612–616. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Unterman, S.R.; Rootman, D.S.; Hill, J.M.; Parelman, J.J.; Thompson, H.W.; Kaufman, H.E. Collagen shield drug delivery: Therapeutic concentrations of tobramycin III the rabbit cornea and aqueous humor. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 1988, 14, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Milani, J.K.; Verbukh, I.; Pleyer, U.; Sumner, H.; Adamu, S.A.; Halabi, H.P.; Chou, H.J.; Lee, D.A.; Mondino, B.J. Collagen shields impregnated with gentamicin-dexamethasone as a potential drug delivery device. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 116, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gebhardt, B.M.; Kaufman, H.E. Collagen as a delivery system for hydrophobic drugs: Studies with cyclosporine. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 1995, 11, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kleinmann, G.; Larson, S.; Hunter, B.; Stevens, S.; Mamalis, N.; Olson, R.J. Collagen shields as a drug delivery system for the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. Ophthalmologica 2007, 221, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abdelhakeem, E.; El-nabarawi, M.; Shamma, R. Effective ocular delivery of eplerenone using nanoengineered lipid carriers in rabbit model. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 4985–5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Willey, D.E.; Williams, I.; Faucett, C.; Openshaw, H. Ocular acyclovir delivery by collagen discs: A mouse model to screen anti-viral agents. Curr. Eye Res. 1991, 10, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wollensak, G.; Sporl, E.; Herbst, H. Biomechanical efficacy of contact lens-assisted collagen cross-linking in porcine eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, e84–e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shi, R.; Wang, W.; Che, Y.; Linghu, S.; Liu, T. Effects of corneal stromal lens collagen cross-linking regraft on corneal biomechanics. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 2022, 8372156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Unas Daza, J.H.; Marinho Righetto, G.; Chaud, M.V.; da Conceicao Amaro Martins, V.; Lopes Baratella da Cunha Camargo, I.; de Guzzi Plepis, A.M. PVA/anionic collagen membranes as drug carriers of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride with sustained antibacterial activity and potential use in the treatment of ulcerative keratitis. J. Biomater. Appl. 2020, 35, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tsai, I.L.; Hsu, C.C.; Hung, K.H.; Chang, C.W.; Cheng, Y.H. Applications of biomaterials in corneal wound healing. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2015, 78, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Samarawickrama, C.; Samanta, A.; Liszka, A.; Fagerholm, P.; Buznyk, O.; Griffith, M.; Allan, B. Collagen-based fillers as alternatives to cyanoacrylate glue for the sealing of large corneal perforations. Cornea 2018, 37, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, F.; Le, P.; Lai, K.; Fernandes-Cunha, G.M.; Myung, D. Simultaneous interpenetrating polymer network of collagen and hyaluronic acid as an in situ forming corneal defect filler. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 5208–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xeroudaki, M.; Thangavelu, M.; Lennikov, A.; Ratnayake, A.; Bisevac, J.; Petrovski, G.; Fagerholm, P.; Rafat, M.; Lagali, N. A porous collagen-based hydrogel and implantation method for corneal stromal regeneration and sustained local drug delivery. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hackett, J.M.; Lagali, N.; Merrett, K.; Edelhauser, H.; Sun, Y.; Gan, L.; Griffith, M.; Fagerholm, P. Biosynthetic corneal implants for replacement of pathologic corneal tissue: Performance in a controlled rabbit alkali burn model. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, X.; Wei, D.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, Q. Hyaluronic acid in ocular drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 264, 118006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nagayasu, A.; Hosaka, Y.; Yamasaki, A.; Tsuzuki, K. A preliminary study of direct application of atelocollagen into a wound lesion in the dog cornea. Curr. Eye Res. 2008, 33, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kostenko, A.; Swioklo, S.; Connon, C.J. Alginate in corneal tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 17, 022004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dong, Q.; Wu, D.; Li, M.; Dong, W. Polysaccharides, as biological macromolecule-based scaffolding biomaterials in cornea tissue engineering: A review. Tissue Cell 2022, 76, 1017822022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao, L.; Weir, M.D.; Xu, H.H. An injectable calcium phosphate-alginate hydrogel-umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell paste for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 6502–6510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shams, E.; Barzad, M.S.; Mohamadnia, S.; Tavakoli, O.; Mehrdadfar, S. A review on alginate-based bioinks, combination with other natural biomaterials and characteristics. J. Biomater. Appl. 2022, 37, 355–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xu, W.; Liu, K.; Li, T.; Zhang, W.; Dong, Y.; Lv, J.; Wang, W.; Sun, J.; Li, M.; Wang, M.; et al. An in situ hydrogel based on carboxymethyl chitosan and sodium alginate dialdehyde for corneal wound healing after alkali burn. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2019, 4, 742–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liang, Y.; Liu, W.; Han, B.; Yang, C.; Ma, Q.; Song, F.; Bi, Q. An in situ formed biodegradable hydrogel for reconstruction of the corneal endothelium. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2011, 82, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhao, L.; Shi, Z.; Sun, X.; Yu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Natural dual-crosslinking bioadhesive hydrogel for corneal regeneration in large-size defects. Adv. Healthc. Mater 2022, 11, 2201576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Silva, D.; Pinto, L.F.V.; Bozukova, D.; Santos, L.F.; Serro, A.P.; Saramago, B. Chitosan/alginate based multilayers to control drug release from ophthalmic lens. Colloids Surf. B 2016, 147, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Silva, D.; de Sousa, H.C.; Gil, M.H.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Saramago, B.; Serro, A.P. Layer-by-layer coated silicone-based soft contact lens hydrogel for diclofenac sustained release. Ann. Med. 2020, 53, S22–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhu, X.; Su, M.; Tang, S.; Wang, L.; Liang, X.; Meng, F.; Hong, Y.; Xu, Z. Synthesis of thiolated chitosan and preparation nanoparticles with sodium alginate for ocular drug delivery. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 1973–1982. [Google Scholar]
  84. Maccarone, R.; Tisi, A.; Passacantando, M.; Ciancaglini, M. Ophthalmic applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 36, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wafa, H.G.; Essa, E.A.; El-Sisi, A.E.; El Maghraby, G.M. Ocular films versus film-forming liquid systems for enhanced ocular drug delivery. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2021, 11, 1084–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mandal, S.; Thimmasetty, M.; Prabhushankar, G.L.; Geetha, M.S. Formulation and evaluation of an in situ gel-forming ophthalmic formulation of moxifloxacin hydrochloride. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2012, 2, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Noreen, S.; Ghumman, S.A.; Batool, F.; Ijaz, B.; Basharat, M.; Noureen, S.; Kausar, T.; Iqbal, S. Terminalia arjuna gum/ alginate in situ gel system with prolonged retention time for ophthalmic drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 1056–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nair, A.B.; Shah, J.; Jacob, S.; Al-Dhubiab, B.E.; Sreeharsha, N.; Morsy, M.A.; Gupta, S.; Attimarad, M.; Shinu, P.; Venugopala, K.N. Experimental design, formulation and in vivo evaluation of a novel topical in situ gel system to treat ocular infections. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, F.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.; Wu, B.; Wang, Y.; Pang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Ma, F.; Wang, X.; et al. Lollipop-inspired multilayered drug delivery hydrogel for dual effective, long-term, and NIR-defined glaucoma. Treat. Macromol. Biosci. 2021, 21, 2100202. [Google Scholar]
  90. Polat, H.K.; Pehlivan, S.B.; Özkul, C.; Çalamak, S.; Öztürk, N.; Aytekin, E.; Fırat, A.; Ulubayram, K.; Kocabeyoğlu, S.; İrkeç, M.; et al. Development of besifloxacin HCl loaded nanofibrous ocular inserts for the treatment of bacterial keratitis: In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 585, 119552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Feng, W.; Yang, X.; Feng, M.; Pan, H.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, D.; Ma, F.; Mao, Y. Alginate oligosaccharide prevents against D-galactose-mediated cataract in C57BL/6J mice via regulating oxidative stress and antioxidant system. Curr. Eye Res. 2020, 46, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wright, B.; Cave, R.A.; Cook, J.P.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V.; Mi, S.; Chen, B.; Leyland, M.; Connon, C.J. Enhanced viability of corneal epithelial cells for efficient transport/storage using a structurally modified calcium alginate hydrogel. Regen. Med. 2012, 7, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lee, J.H.; Kim, W.G.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.B. Development and characterization of an alginate impregnated polyester vascular graft. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hashemibeni, B.; Esfandiari, E.; Sadeghi, F.; Heidary, F.; Roshankhah, S.; Mardani, M.; Goharian, V. An animal model study for bone repair with encapsulated differentiated osteoblasts from adipose-derived stem cells in alginate. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 2014, 17, 854–859. [Google Scholar]
  95. Chu, J.; Zeng, S.; Gao, L.; Groth, T.; Li, Z.; Kong, J.; Zhao, M.; Li, L. Poly (L-Lactic Acid) Porous scaffold-supported alginate hydrogel with improved mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2016, 39, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yang, H.K.; Ham, D.S.; Park, H.S.; Rhee, M.; You, Y.H.; Kim, M.J.; Shin, J.; Kim, O.Y.; Khang, G.; Hong, T.H.; et al. Long-term efficacy and biocompatibility of encapsulated islet transplantation with chitosan-coated alginate capsules in mice and canine models of diabetes. Transplantation 2016, 100, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Battistini, F.D.; Tártara, L.I.; Boiero, C.; Guzmán, M.L.; Luciani-Giaccobbe, L.C.; Palma, S.D.; Allemandi, D.A.; Manzo, R.H.; Olivera, M.E. The role of hyaluronan as a drug carrier to enhance the bioavailability of extended release ophthalmic formulations. Hyaluronan-timolol ionic complexes as a model case. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 105, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mero, A.; Campisi, M. Hyaluronic acid bioconjugates for the delivery of bioactive molecules. Polymers 2014, 6, 346–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singh, A.; Li, P.; Beachley, V.; McDonnell, P.; Elisseeff, J.H. A hyaluronic acid-binding contact lens with enhanced water retention. Cont. Lens Anterior Eye 2015, 38, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. An, C.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, L.; Ren, C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Hyaluronic acid-based multifunctional carriers for applications in regenerative medicine: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Stiebel-Kalish, H.; Gaton, D.D.; Weinberger, D.; Loya, N.; Schwartz-Ventik, M.; Solomon, A. A comparison of the effect of hyaluronic acid versus gentamicin on corneal epithelial healing. Eye 1998, 12, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yang, G.; Espandar, L.; Mamalis, N.; Prestwich, G.D. A cross-linked hyaluronan gel accelerates healing of corneal epithelial abrasion and alkali burn injuries in rabbits. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2010, 13, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Williams, D.L.; Mann, B.K. A crosslinked HA-based hydrogel ameliorates dry eye symptoms in dogs. Int. J. Biomater. 2013, 2013, 460437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Williams, D.L.; Mann, B.K. Efficacy of a crosslinked hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel as a tear film supplement: A masked controlled study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Durrie, D.S.; Wolsey, D.; Thompson, V.; Assang, C.; Mann, B.; Wirostko, B. Ability of a new crosslinked polymer ocular bandage gel to accelerate reepithelialization after photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2018, 44, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Xu, W.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Z.; Li, T.; Zhang, W.; Liang, Y. Carboxymethyl chitosan/gelatin/hyaluronic acid blended-membranes as epithelia transplanting scaffold for corneal wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Okumura, N.; Kinoshita, S.; Koizumi, N. Cell-based approach for treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Cornea 2014, 33, S37–S41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Salwowska, N.M.; Bebenek, K.A.; Zazdło, D.A.; Wcisło-Dziadecka, D.L. Physiochemical properties and application of hyaluronic acid: A systematic review. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2016, 15, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Nguyen, D.D.; Yao, C.H.; Luo, L.Y.; Chen, H.C.; Hsueh, Y.J.; Ma, D.H.K.; Lai, J.Y. Oxidation-mediated scaffold engineering of hyaluronic acid-based microcarriers enhances corneal stromal regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 292, 119668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Koivusalo, L.; Kauppila, M.; Samanta, S.; Parihar, V.S.; Ilmarinen, T.; Miettinen, S.; Oommen, O.P.; Skottman, H. Tissue adhesive hyaluronic acid hydrogels for sutureless stem cell delivery and regeneration of corneal epithelium and stroma. Biomaterials 2019, 225, 119516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kompella, U.B.; Hartman, R.R.; Patil, M.A. Extraocular, periocular, and intraocular routes for sustained drug delivery for glaucoma. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2021, 82, 100901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Maulvi, F.A.; Shaikh, A.A.; Lakdawala, D.H.; Desai, A.R.; Pandya, M.M.; Singhania, S.S.; Vaidya, R.J.; Ranch, K.M.; Vyas, B.A.; Shah, D.O. Design and optimization of a novel implantation technology in contact lenses for the treatment of dry eye syndrome: In vitro and in vivo Evaluation. Acta Biomater. 2017, 53, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, R.; Guan, X.; Lin, X.; Guan, P.; Zhang, X.; Rao, Z.; Du, L.; Zhao, J.; Rong, J.; Zhao, J. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)/ β-cyclodextrin-hyaluronan contact lens with tear protein adsorption resistance and sustained drug delivery for ophthalmic diseases. Acta Biomater. 2020, 110, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nguyen, D.; Hui, A.; Weeks, A.; Heynen, M.; Joyce, E.; Sheardown, H.; Jones, L. Release of ciprofloxacin-HCl and dexamethasone phosphate by hyaluronic acid containing silicone polymers. Materials 2012, 5, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Maulvi, F.A.; Soni, T.G.; Shah, D.O. Extended release of hyaluronic acid from hydrogel contact lenses for dry eye syndrome. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2015, 26, 1035–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhang, J.; Ziaei, M.; McKelvie, J.; McGhee, C.N.J.; Patel, D.V. Integration and remodelling of a collagen anterior lamellar keratoplasty graft in an animal model—A preliminary report. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 209, 108661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhang, Z.; Suner, S.S.; Blake, D.A.; Ayyala, R.S.; Sahiner, N. Antimicrobial activity and biocompatibility of slow-release hyaluronic acid-antibiotic conjugated particles. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 576, 119024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fiorica, C.; Palumbo, F.S.; Pitarresi, G.; Bongiovì, F.; Giammona, G. Hyaluronic acid and beta cyclodextrins films for the release of corneal epithelial cells and dexamethasone. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 166, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Apaolaza, P.S.; Busch, M.; Asin-Prieto, E.; Peynshaert, K.; Rathod, R.; Remaut, K.; Dünker, N.; Gopferich, A. Hyaluronic acid coating of gold nanoparticles for intraocular drug delivery: Evaluation of the surface properties and effect on their distribution. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 198, 108151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Than, A.; Liu, C.; Chang, H.; Duong, P.K.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, P. Self-implantable double-layered micro-drug-reservoirs for efficient and controlled ocular drug delivery. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zheng, K.; Chen, Y.; Huang, W.; Lin, Y.; Kaplan, D.L.; Fan, Y. Chemically functionalized silk for human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells proliferation and differentiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 14406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Melke, J.; Midha, S.; Ghosh, S.; Ito, K.; Hofmann, S. Silk fibroin as biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2016, 31, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Woodruff, M.A.; Hutmacher, D.W. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 1217–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kant, V.; Gopal, A.; Kumar, D.; Gopalkrishnana, A.; Pathaka, N.N.; Kurade, N.P.; Tandana, S.K.; Kumar, D. Topical pluronic F-127 gel application enhances cutaneous wound healing in rats. Acta Histochem. 2014, 116, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Foresti, R.; Ghezzi, B.; Vettori, M.; Bergonzi, L.; Attolino, S.; Rossi, S.; Tarabella, G.; Vurro, D.; von Zeppelin, D.; Iannotta, S.; et al. 3D printed masks for powders and viruses safety protection using food grade polymers: Empirical tests. Polymers 2021, 13, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gourishanker, J.; Kumar, A. Drug delivery through soft contact lenses: An introduction. Chron. Young Sci. 2011, 2, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving PCL (created by BioRender.com).
Figure 1. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving PCL (created by BioRender.com).
Vetsci 11 00368 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving pluronic (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Figure 2. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving pluronic (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Vetsci 11 00368 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving silk (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Figure 3. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving silk (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Vetsci 11 00368 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving collagen (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Figure 4. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving collagen (adapted from https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051971).
Vetsci 11 00368 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving alginate (created by BioRender.com).
Figure 5. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving alginate (created by BioRender.com).
Vetsci 11 00368 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving hyaluronic acid (created by BioRender.com).
Figure 6. Schematic illustration summarizing common uses and in vivo experiments in veterinary medicine involving hyaluronic acid (created by BioRender.com).
Vetsci 11 00368 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leonardi, F.; Simonazzi, B.; Martini, F.M.; D’Angelo, P.; Foresti, R.; Botti, M. Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials in Veterinary Medicine and Ophthalmology: A Review of Clinical Cases and Experimental Studies. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080368

AMA Style

Leonardi F, Simonazzi B, Martini FM, D’Angelo P, Foresti R, Botti M. Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials in Veterinary Medicine and Ophthalmology: A Review of Clinical Cases and Experimental Studies. Veterinary Sciences. 2024; 11(8):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leonardi, Fabio, Barbara Simonazzi, Filippo Maria Martini, Pasquale D’Angelo, Ruben Foresti, and Maddalena Botti. 2024. "Synthetic and Natural Biomaterials in Veterinary Medicine and Ophthalmology: A Review of Clinical Cases and Experimental Studies" Veterinary Sciences 11, no. 8: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11080368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop