Efficacy of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols in Crossbred Gyr Dairy Cows and Their Relationship with Heat Stress in the Peruvian Tropics
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Experimental Design
2.3. Estrus Synchronization Protocols
2.4. Estrus Detection Signs and Artificial Insemination
2.5. Temperature–Humidity Index (THI)
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Correction Statement
References
- Hernández-Castellano, L.E.; Nally, J.E.; Lindahl, J.; Wanapat, M.; Alhidary, I.A.; Fangueiro, D.; Grace, D.; Ratto, M.; Bambou, J.C.; Almeida, A.M. Dairy science and health in the tropics: Challenges and opportunities for the next decades. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchioretto, P.V.; Rabel, R.; Allen, C.A.; Ole-Neselle, M.M.; Wheeler, M.B. Development of genetically improved tropical-adapted dairy cattle. Anim. Front. 2023, 13, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sammad, A.; Umer, S.; Shi, R.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y. Dairy cow reproduction under the influence of heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 978–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Rensis, F.; Lopez-Gatius, F.; García-Ispierto, I.; Morini, G.; Scaramuzzi, R.J. Causes of declining fertility in dairy cows during the warm season. Theriogenology 2017, 91, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, P.J. Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: Implications for fertility and assisted reproduction. Anim. Reprod. 2019, 16, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, G.; Brizuela, A.B.; Rondan, G.A.; Lissaso, C.; Kemerer, A.C.; de Los Santos, C.M. Determination of the temperature and humidity index (THI) for milk cows, in the Nogoyá Department, Entre Ríos. Rev. Científica Agropecu. 2016, 20, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
- Galina, C.S.; Orihuela, A.; Rubio, I. Behavioral characteristics of zebu cattle with emphasis on reproductive efficiency. In Factors Affecting Calf Crop; Fields, M.J., Sand, R.S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruselli, P.S.; Ferreira, R.M.; Colli, M.H.A.; Elliff, F.M.; Sá Filho, M.F.; Vieira, L.; de Freitas, B.G. Timed artificial insemination: Current challenges and recent advances in reproductive efficiency in beef and dairy herds in Brazil. Anim. Reprod. 2018, 14, 558–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drake, E.; Holden, S.A.; Aublet, V.; Doyle, R.C.; Millar, C.; Moore, S.G.; Maicas, C.; Randi, F.; Cromie, A.R.; Lonergan, P.; et al. Evaluation of delayed timing of artificial insemination with sex-sorted sperm on pregnancy per artificial insemination in seasonal-calving, pasture-based lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 12059–12068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peralta-Torres, J.A.; Ojeda-Robertos, N.F.; Segura-Correa, J.C. Ovulation synchronization protocols and factors associated with pregnancy rate of Zebu Females. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems 2021, 24, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.B.; Kasimanickam, R.K.; Glaze, J.B., Jr.; Roberts-Lew, M.C. Impact of delayed insemination on pregnancy rates to gender selected semen in a fixed-time AI system. Theriogenology 2017, 102, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, M.H.C.; Cappellozza, B.I.; Costa, W.M.; Barbosa, L.; Cerri, R.L.A.; Vasconcelos, J.L.M. Effects of estradiol cypionate dose as an ovulatory stimulus on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows during the summer season. Theriogenology 2022, 182, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferré, L.B.; Aguirregabiria, B.; Cerviño, N.; Bello, R.; Jensen, M.; Fresno, C.; Kjelland, M.E.; Colazo, M. Fixed-time artificial insemination in virgin beef heifers using a seven-day progesterone-based protocol: Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone versus oestradiol salts. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2022, 35, 216–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sales, A.; Cappellozza, B.I.; Vilela, E.; Júnior, I.C.; Sá Filho, O.G.; Vasconcelos, J.L.M. Effects of estradiol cypionate dosage and body condition on reproductive performance of Nellore cattle synchronized for timed-artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2023, 210, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núñez-Olivera, R.; Bó, G.A.; Menchaca, A. Association between length of proestrus, follicular size, estrus behavior, and pregnancy rate in beef heifers subjected to fixed–time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2022, 181, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bó, G.A.; De La Mata, J.J.; Baruselli, P.S.; Menchaca, A. Alternative programs for synchronizing and resynchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SENAMNI [Servicio Nacional de Meteorología e Hidrología]. Estaciones Meteorológicas. Available online: https://www.senamhi.gob.pe/?&p=estaciones (accessed on 24 February 2025).
- Hahn, G.L.; Gaughan, J.B.; Mader, T.L.; Eigenberg, R.A. Chapter 5: Thermal indices and their applications for livestock environments. In Livestock Energetics and Thermal Environmental Management; De Shazer, J.A., Ed.; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2009; pp. 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, D. Heat Stress Interaction with Shade and Cooling. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2044–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schüller, L.K.; Burfeind, O.; Heuwieser, W. Impact of heat stress on conception rate of dairy cows in the moderate climate considering different temperature–humidity index thresholds, periods relative to breeding, and heat load indices. Theriogenology 2014, 81, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, L.M.; Yostar, E.J.; Capellari, A. Reproductive performance evaluation in two indics crosses females categories with conventional protocol and J-Synch. Rev. Vet. 2022, 33, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Quevedo, C.; Ramírez García, A.; Torres Bernal, L.; Cáceres Coral, J.; Ampuero Trigoso, G.; Saucedo-Uriarte, J.A. Effect of different protocols of fixed-time artificial insemination on mucus, ovarian size and pregnancy of mixed-breed cows in the Humid Tropics of Peru. Vet. Med. Int. 2023, 2023, 9942021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayati, R.N.; Panjono, P.; Irawan, A. Estrous signs and progesterone profile of Ongole Grade cows synchronized at different ages fed different level of dietary crude protein. Trop. Anim. Sci. J. 2021, 44, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poclín-Rojas, A.Y.; Segura, G.T.; Carrillo, D.B.; Ampuero-Trigoso, G.; Quispe-Ccasa, H.A.; Vásquez-Tarrillo, R.W.; Depaz-Hizo, B.; Saucedo-Uriarte, J.A. Use Intensity of Progesterone Devices for Fixed-time Artificial Insemination in Gyr Crossbred Cows from the Peruvian Tropics. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2025, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macagno, A.; Ezenga, A.; Marini, P.; Bo, G.A. Follicular characteristics and pregnancy rates to AI in Holstein heifers treated with two protocols with prolonged proestrus and inseminated with sexed semen. Anim.—Sci. Proceeding 2023, 14, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilla-Campaña, M.; Yánez-Avalos, D.; Ortega-Coello, M.; Aragadvay-Yungan, R.; Roberto Marini, P. Evaluation of the effect of two synchronization protocols on Estradiol and Progesterone levels in Dual Purpose cows from the Ecuatorian Amazon. Rev. Cient. Fac. Cienc. Vet. Univ. Zulia 2023, 33, e33200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huber, E.; Notaro, U.S.; Recce, S.; Rodríguez, F.M.; Ortega, H.H.; Salvetti, N.R.; Rey, F. Fetal programming in dairy cows: Effect of heat stress on progeny fertility and associations with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functions. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 216, 106348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reineri, P.S.; Coria, M.S.; Principi, S.; Pérez, R.P.; Palma, G.A. Pregnancy rate after FTAI in Braford heifers submitted to J-Synch protocol. Med. Veterinária 2020, 14, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roth, Z. Reproductive physiology and endocrinology responses of cows exposed to environmental heat stress-Experiences from the past and lessons for the present. Theriogenology 2020, 155, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Díaz, R.F.; Galina, C.S.; Aranda, E.M.; Aceves, L.A.; Sánchez, J.G.; Pablos, J.L. Effect of temperature—Humidity index on the onset of post- partum ovarian activity and reproductive behavior in Bos indicus cows. Anim. Reprod. 2020, 17, e20190074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacetera, N. Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare. Anim. Front. 2019, 9, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cardone, D.A.; Cáceres, A.R.R.; Sanhueza, M.A.; Bruna, F.A.; Laconi, M.R. Effects of short-term in vitro heat stress on bovine preantral follicles. Livest. Sci. 2022, 264, 105076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bó, G.A.; Pinargote, L.; Bernal, B.; Mendoza, B.; Ocampo, V.; Cedeño, A.V. Follicular characteristics and pregnancy rates in suckling Bos indicus cows synchronised with oestradiol-based or gonadotrophin-releasing-hormone-based protocols with a lengthened proestrus. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2022, 35, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polsky, L.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Invited review: Effects of heat stress on dairy cattle welfare. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 8645–8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stevenson, J.S.; Pulley, S.L. Feedback effects of estradiol and progesterone on ovulation and fertility of dairy cows after gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced release of luteinizing hormone. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 3003–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Protocol | * UT (%) | Cervical Mucus (%) | ** Follicular Diameter (mm) | Estrus Rate (%) | Pregnancy Rate (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UT1 | UT2 | UT3 | |||||
PC9 | 0 (0) | 32.91 (26) | 67.09 (53) | 43.04 (34) | 12.54 ± 3.43 b | 59.49 (47) | 39.24 (31) |
J-Synch6 | 1.25 (1) | 32.50 (26) | 66.25 (53) | 45.00 (36) | 14.47 ± 4.03 a | 60.00 (48) | 42.50 (34) |
p-value | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0.68 |
Variable | Levels | Estrus (%) | Pregnancy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Period | Period 1 (September–December) | 47.6 (20) | 38.1 (16) |
Period 2 (January–March) | 53.6 (15) | 42.9 (12) | |
Period 3 (April–July) | 68.9 (31) | 44.4 (20) | |
Period 4 (July–August) | 65.9 (29) | 38.6 (17) | |
p-value | 0.15 | 0.92 | |
Cervical mucus | Present | 68.1 (47) | 49.3 (34) |
Absent | 53.3 (48) | 34.4 (31) | |
p-value | 0.06 | 0.06 | |
Corpus luteum | Present | 65.7 (44) | 56.7 (38) a |
Absent | 55.4 (51) | 29.3 (27) b | |
p-value | 0.19 | <0.01 |
PC9 | J-Synch6 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cervical Mucus | Estrus Presence | Pregnancy | Corpus Luteum | Cervical Mucus | Estrus Presence | Pregnancy | Corpus Luteum | |
Uterine tone | 0.391 (**) | 0.355 (**) | 0.397 (**) | 0.102 | 0.180 | 0.447 (**) | 0.297 (**) | 0.147 |
<0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.373 | 0.110 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.193 | |
Cervical mucus | 0.196 | 0.296 (**) | 0.145 | 0.174 | 0.086 | 0.118 | ||
0.083 | 0.008 | 0.202 | 0.122 | 0.446 | 0.295 | |||
Estrus presence | 0.452 (**) | 0.071 | 0.341 (**) | 0.143 | ||||
<0.001 | 0.531 | 0.002 | 0.205 | |||||
Pregnancy | 0.265 (*) | 0.268 (*) | ||||||
0.018 | 0.016 |
PC9 | J-Synch6 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phases of FTAI Program | THI | UT3 | Cervical Mucus | Estrus | Pregnancy | UT3 | Cervical Mucus | Estrus | Pregnancy |
Phase 1 (Antral follicle and emergence) | Cat. 0 | 0.005 | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.005 | −0.004 | 0.006 (*) | 0.001 |
Cat. 1 | −0.006 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.001 | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.006 | 0.001 | |
Cat. 2 | −0.004 | 0.014 | 0.003 | 0.006 | −0.012 | 0.011 | −0.009 | −0.002 | |
Cat. 3 | −0.006 | −0.002 | −0.008 | −0.003 | −0.011 | 0.010 | −0.010 | −0.001 | |
Phase 2 (Onset of the previous estrous cycle) | Cat. 0 | 0.007 | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.001 | 0.007 | −0.005 | 0.009 (*) | 0.001 |
Cat. 1 | −0.007 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.002 | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.006 | 0.001 | |
Cat. 2 | −0.011 | 0.016 | −0.002 | 0.005 | −0.023 | 0.021 | −0.020 | −0.003 | |
Cat. 3 | −0.008 | −0.002 | −0.011 | −0.003 | −0.015 | 0.013 | −0.013 | −0.001 | |
Phase 3 (Follicular growth) | Cat. 0 | 0.047 | −0.021 | −0.004 | −0.007 | 0.046 | −0.033 | 0.056 (*) | −0.001 |
Cat. 1 | −0.082 | 0.231 | 0.204 | 0.119 | −0.055 | 0.032 | −0.097 | 0.008 | |
Cat. 2 | −0.068 | 0.066 | 0.034 | 0.029 | −0.068 | 0.050 | −0.083 | 0.001 | |
Cat. 3 | −0.072 | −0.013 | −0.037 | −0.013 | −0.075 | 0.058 | −0.089 (*) | 0.002 | |
Phase 4 (Pre-ovulatory follicle) | Cat. 0 | 0.114 | −0.037 | −0.013 | −0.013 | 0.094 | −0.063 | 0.128 (*) | −0.006 |
Cat. 1 | −0.039 | 0.053 | 0.064 | 0.030 | −0.006 | −0.004 | −0.034 | 0.008 | |
Cat. 2 | 0.052 | −0.039 | −0.170 | −0.042 | −0.123 | 0.133 | −0.016 | −0.038 | |
Cat. 3 | −0.065 | −0.082 | −0.095 | −0.050 | −0.070 | 0.057 | −0.076 | 0.001 | |
Phase 5 (Ovulation and fertilization) | Cat. 0 | 0.005 | 0.001 | ||||||
Cat. 1 | −0.004 | 0.004 | |||||||
Cat. 2 | 0.010 | −0.014 | |||||||
Cat. 3 | −0.004 | −0.022 | |||||||
Phase 6 (Recognition and implantation) | Cat. 0 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||
Cat. 1 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |||||||
Cat. 2 | −0.003 | −0.002 | |||||||
Cat. 3 | −0.009 | −0.003 | |||||||
Phase 7 (Early fetal development) | Cat. 0 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||
Cat. 1 | 0.001 | −0.001 | |||||||
Cat. 2 | −0.004 | −0.001 | |||||||
Cat. 3 | −0.005 | −0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vásquez-Tarrillo, R.W.; Hernández-Guevara, J.E.; Depaz-Hizo, B.A.; Ampuero-Trigoso, G.; Poclín-Rojas, A.Y.; Rojas-Reategui, M.; Segura Portocarrero, G.T.; Juarez-Moreno, J.D.; Quispe-Ccasa, H.A. Efficacy of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols in Crossbred Gyr Dairy Cows and Their Relationship with Heat Stress in the Peruvian Tropics. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090804
Vásquez-Tarrillo RW, Hernández-Guevara JE, Depaz-Hizo BA, Ampuero-Trigoso G, Poclín-Rojas AY, Rojas-Reategui M, Segura Portocarrero GT, Juarez-Moreno JD, Quispe-Ccasa HA. Efficacy of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols in Crossbred Gyr Dairy Cows and Their Relationship with Heat Stress in the Peruvian Tropics. Veterinary Sciences. 2025; 12(9):804. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090804
Chicago/Turabian StyleVásquez-Tarrillo, Ronald W., José E. Hernández-Guevara, Benjamín A. Depaz-Hizo, Gustavo Ampuero-Trigoso, Annie Y. Poclín-Rojas, Marisol Rojas-Reategui, Gleni T. Segura Portocarrero, Jorge D. Juarez-Moreno, and Hurley A. Quispe-Ccasa. 2025. "Efficacy of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols in Crossbred Gyr Dairy Cows and Their Relationship with Heat Stress in the Peruvian Tropics" Veterinary Sciences 12, no. 9: 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090804
APA StyleVásquez-Tarrillo, R. W., Hernández-Guevara, J. E., Depaz-Hizo, B. A., Ampuero-Trigoso, G., Poclín-Rojas, A. Y., Rojas-Reategui, M., Segura Portocarrero, G. T., Juarez-Moreno, J. D., & Quispe-Ccasa, H. A. (2025). Efficacy of Two Estrus Synchronization Protocols in Crossbred Gyr Dairy Cows and Their Relationship with Heat Stress in the Peruvian Tropics. Veterinary Sciences, 12(9), 804. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12090804