Next Article in Journal
Characterization of PEBP-like Genes and Function of Capebp1 and Capebp5 in Fruiting Body Regeneration in Cyclocybe aegerita
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular and Morphological Identification of Sarocladium Species Causing Sheath Rot of Rice in Thailand and Their Division into Physiological Races
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differential Carbon Catabolite Repression and Hemicellulolytic Ability among Pathotypes of Colletotrichum lindemuthianum against Natural Plant Substrates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/jof10080536
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Fungal Species Isolated from Cankered Apple Barks Demonstrates the Alternaria alternata Causing Apple Canker Disease

by
Zhiqiang Li
†,
Hao Li
†,
Jiating Zhang
,
Shikai Zhang
,
Qi Zhao
,
Chunzhen Cheng
and
Yongyan Zhang
*
College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(8), 536; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080536
Submission received: 24 June 2024 / Revised: 29 July 2024 / Accepted: 29 July 2024 / Published: 31 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Plant Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Apple canker disease, also named as apple Valsa canker, is one of the most destructive diseases for apples (Malus domestica Borkh.). Cytospora/Valsa spp. are the dominant causal agent of this disease, but many studies have revealed that fungi from some other genus can also cause typical apple canker symptoms. In this study, we performed fungal pathogen isolation from cankered ‘Fuji’ apple barks. Six representative morphologically different fungi (Strain 1–6) were further subjected to ITS sequencing and evolutionary analysis. Molecular identification results revealed that Strains 1–6 are Cytospora mali, Fusarium cf. solani, Alternaria alternata, C. mali, Diplodia seriata and F. proliferatum, respectively. All these fungi have been reported to be causal agents of apple diseases. By inoculating fungal plugs onto trunks of ‘Fuji’ apple trees, the pathogenicity of the six fungi were accessed. Only the inoculations of the two C. mali strains (Strain 1 and Strain 4) and the A. alternata strain (Strain 3) resulted in typical apple canker symptoms in trunks. It is worth noting that Strain 1 caused much more severe canker symptoms and higher pathogenicity incidence than the other two fungi. A. alternata has been identified as a pathogen causing diseases on apple fruits and leaves. By further assessing its pathogenicity on apple fruits and leaves, we verified that it can also cause typical fruit rot and leaf spot symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on apple canker disease caused by A. alternata in China. Our present study can provide a theoretical foundation for the prevention and control of apple canker disease.

1. Introduction

Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), the most economically and commercially important temperate fruit crop, is one of the most widely cultivated fruit trees worldwide [1,2]. Its annual production ranked as the fourth of all fruit crops behind banana, orange and grape [3]. China has the largest apple planting area in the world, and produces approximately a half of the world’s apple supply [4,5]. However, in recent years, the apple industry in China has been greatly threatened by some progressive and destructive diseases, such as apple canker disease (also called apple Valsa canker disease, AVC), apple ring rot, apple mosaic disease, apple rust disease, apple black rot disease and so on [6,7,8]. Among them, AVC is the most destructive fungal disease [7,9], and has significantly decreased yields of apples in China and worldwide [10]. AVC was first reported in Japan in 1903 [11]. In China, this disease was first reported in Liaoning province in 1916 [12]. Since then, it has emerged as one of the largest troubles for the apple industry in China, causing significant economic losses.
The typical symptoms of AVC mainly include cankers on trunks, branch surfaces and scaffold limbs, dieback of twigs, and death of distal parts and even the whole tree [13,14] (Figure 1). Its effected area develops very fast, especially between spring and early summer [15]. As a disease that has been discovered and reported for more than 120 years, the causal pathogens of apple canker disease have been intensively investigated. Evidence revealed that various Cytospora/Valsa species are causal agents of AVC [10,14], and Cytospora/Valsa mali is generally associated with the severest branch and tree deaths [10]. Research also revealed that the Cytospora species causing AVC differed in different apple planting areas [16]. In the Tarim Basin of China, C. pyri was reported to be the most dominant species causing apple canker disease. C. melnikii, C. tritici, C. euonymina and C. parasitica have also been described as causal agents of apple canker in China [17,18]. In apple production hubs of Iran, however, C. cincta was identified as an agent causing canker disease. Moreover, fungi from some other genus, such as Diplodia seriata [17], Diplodia bulgarica [19], Botryosphaeria dothidea [20], Neofusicoccum parvum, Diaporthe feoniculina, Diaporthe eres, Pestalotiposis funerea and Phomopsis spp. [21], have also been reported to have the pathogenicity of causing apple canker. The diversity of causal pathogens makes the control of apple canker disease very hard and to some extent leads to the fact that this disease is still prevalent in many apple producing areas [22].
Shanxi province is one of the seven major apple-planting provinces in China [23]. High incidence of apple canker disease has greatly influenced the apple yield and quality there, especially in Yuncheng city, which is the main apple producing area in Shanxi province. In this study, to investigate the pathogens causing canker disease in ‘Fuji’ apple trees planted in Linyi county of Yuncheng city, fungal isolation and purification, molecular identification and pathogenicity assay experiments were performed. The results obtained in this study will be helpful in guiding pesticide selections for the prevention and control of apple canker disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Shoot Sampling and Plant Materials

In October 2023, cankered ‘Fuji’ apple shoots with thicknesses of about 0.5 cm were collected in a 15-year-old apple orchard (35°12′33.02″ N; 110°44′15.01″ E) located in Linyi County, Yuncheng city, Shanxi Province of China. Then, shoots were taken back to lab on ice and used for fungal isolation and identification.
For apple canker disease pathogenicity assays, one-year-old ‘Fuji’ apple seedlings (grafting on Malus robusta (CarriŠre) Rehd. rootstocks) were used. To investigate the pathogenicity of Alternaria alternata in apple fruits and leaves, ‘Fuji’ fruits and ‘Gala’ leaves were used, respectively. All these apple samples used for pathogenicity assays were provided by our lab.

2.2. Isolation and Morphological Identification of Pathogens

Pathogen isolation was performed according to the method of Wang et al. [24]. Bark, at the diseased and healthy conjunction, were cut into about 0.3 cm × 0.3 cm small pieces. After surface sterilizing using 75% ethanol (for 180 s) and 3% sodium hypochlorite solution (for 60 s), samples were washed with sterile water for 30 s 3 times. Then, bark was placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (containing 30 μg/mL streptomycin) in the dark for two days. Hyphae growing out from the bark were picked and transferred into fresh sterilized PDA media for 2–3 rounds of purifications. Purified fungi were inoculated onto the center of PDA dish (with diameter of 9 cm) to observe their colony characteristics. Colony dimeters of purified fungi were detected every day until colonies covered the whole dish. For each fungus, at least three replications were made. For the morphological observations of mycelia and conidia, fungi that have been cultured on PDA plates for ten days were washed from PDA medium using sterile water, and observed under a microscope (ECLIPSE Ni-U, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Molecular Identification of Isolated Fungi

After culturing on PDA plate at 28 °C for 7 d, mycelia were collected and fast frozen in liquid nitrogen. Then, mycelia were ground into fine powders and subjected to total genomic isolation using the fungus genomic DNA extraction kit (Hangzhou Boer technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). After DNA quality detection using a NanoONE instrument (Yooning, Hangzhou, China) and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, DNA samples were diluted into a final concentration of 50 ng/µL and used for internal transcribed sequence (ITS) fragment amplifications using ITS1/ITS4 primer pair [24,25,26]. The 50 µL PCR system contains 25 µL Dream TaqTM Green PCR Master Mix (2×) DNA polymerase, each of 2 µL ITS1 and ITS4 primer, 19 µL ddH2O and a 2 µL DNA template. Amplification was conducted as follows: 95 °C, 3 min; 95 °C, 30 s; 55 °C, 30 s and 72 °C, 30 s, 38 cycles; and 72 °C, 10 min. Amplified PCR products were gel-purified and sent to Sangon Biotech company (Shanghai, China) for Sanger sequencing.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

After BLASTn searches in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 30 October 2023), the top 4~6 homologous ITS sequences sharing identity greater than 99% and query cover ratios higher than 97% with ITSs of isolated fungi that were downloaded. These downloaded homologous ITSs and ITSs of isolated fungi were first subjected to multiple sequence alignment analysis using ClustalW 2.1. Then, a phylogenetic tree for these ITS sequences was constructed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method of MEGA11 under default parameters.

2.5. Pathogenicity Identification

In November 2023, to demonstrate the pathogenicity of isolated fungi in causing canker disease, their fungal plugs were inoculated onto trunks of one-year-old ‘Fuji’ apple trees. By using a scalpel, grafting incisions with lengths of about 1.5 cm and widths of about 0.5 cm were cut into trunks at 20–30 cm above ground. One fungal plug (with a dimeter of about 0.5 cm) was inserted into the incision with the mycelia side inwards [20]. Plastic film was used to wrap the incisions tightly. ‘Fuji’ apple trees inoculated with PDA plugs were used as controls. For the inoculations of each fungus and PDA control, 10 replications were made. After inoculation, apple trees were kept in a solar greenhouse. Disease incidence and symptoms were observed every two weeks. For the fungi that can cause canker symptoms in inoculated trunks, fungal re-isolation was performed to fulfill their Koch’s postulates.

2.6. Alternaria alternata Inoculation on Apple Fruits and Leaves

A. alternata is recognized as a pathogen causing apple postharvest fruit rot and leaf spot diseases. To prove the pathogenicity of the isolated A. alternata strain, fruit and leaf inoculation experiments were performed. After puncturing the apple fruits and leaves with needles, fungal plugs with a diameter of 0.5 cm were inoculated onto fruits and leaves. PDA plugs were also inoculated onto fruits and leaves as controls. For both the fungal plug and PDA plus inoculations, ten fruits and ten leaves were used. After A. alternata inoculation, fruits and leaves were kept in an air-conditioned room at 25 °C with natural light condition. Fruit symptoms were observed and detected at 1, 5 and 10 days post inoculation (dpi), and leaf symptoms were observed and detected at 1, 2 and 3 dpi, respectively.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results for the colony dimeters of isolated fungi on PDA media and diseased areas caused by fungal inoculations were displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three replications. Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) was used to calculate the polynomial regression model for the growth of the six fungi on PDA media. SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was applied to analyze the significance of the differences of cankered areas caused by different pathogens or at different timepoints by Duncan’s Multiple Range test at the 5% level. Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and Origin 2024 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) software were used for figure drawing.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Analysis of Fungal Colonies

The cankers on diseased ‘Fuji’ apple shoots were yellowish-brown or reddish-brown (Figure 1E–G), and the barks of some severe diseased shoots were cracked and easily fell off (Figure 1F). Buds of severe diseased apple shoots were also reddish-brown (Figure 1H), and small reddish-brown cankers can be observed in the buds of mild diseased apple shoots (Figure 1I).
In total, we isolated and purified 11 fungi from the barks of cankered ‘Fuji’ apple trees. After preliminary morphology observation, six strains (Strain 1–6) were used for further study (Figure 2). The growth rates of these six fungi on PDA media varied a lot (Figure 2A,B). Of them, Strain 5 grows the fastest (able to cover the whole 9 cm PDA dish in approximately three days), followed by Strain 1–4 (in four days), and Strain 6, growing the slowest (in eight days). After 14 days of culture (Figure 2A), the Strain 1 colony is light-yellow and can accumulate yellowish pigments; the Strain 2 colony is orange-yellow and accumulates yellow pigments; the Strain 3 colony is grayish black and accumulates black pigments, and the color of its aerial hyphae gradually change from white to gray or grayish black; the Strain 4 colony is light yellow with grayish-white aerial hyphae and accumulates back pigments; the Strain 5 colony is lilac with grayish-white aerial hyphae and accumulates grayish-white pigments; and the Strain 6 colony is purple-red with white aerial hyphae and accumulates purple-red pigments.

3.2. Mycelia and Conidia Observation Results

We further observed the mycelia and conidia of the six fungi. It was found that the mycelia of Strain 1 are septate cylindrical (Figure 3A-1), and its conidia are colorless, round or nearly round (Figure 3B-1). The mycelia of Strain 2 are hollow cylindrical (Figure 3A-2), and its conidia are colorless, nearly oval or sickle shaped (Figure 3B-2). Strain 3 is of septate cylindrical mycelia (Figure 3A-3), and its conidia are single and colorless, round or oval (Figure 3B-3). The mycelium of Strain 4 is hollow cylindrical (Figure 3A-4), and its conidia are single and colorless, round or nearly round (Figure 3B-4). Strain 5 is of septate cylindrical mycelia (Figure 3A-5), and round or oval conidia (Figure 3B-5). Strain 6 is of cylindrical and bamboo-like mycelia (Figure 3A-6) and sickle-shaped or oval, single conidia (Figure 3B-6).

3.3. Molecular Identification Results

By using the universal primer ITS1/ITS4, ITS sequences of all the six isolated fungi were cloned and sequenced. The ITS fragment of Strains 1–6 was 591 bp, 519 bp, 540 bp, 592 bp, 535 bp and 510 bp long, respectively. BLASTn results showed that the ITS sequence similarities between Strain 1 and V. ceratosperma (KF541093.1), V. mali (KT934353.1 and KY942187.1) and C. mali (OQ832663.1), between Strain 2 and Fusarium cf. solani (ON037470.1), F. solani (MT638068.1 and MF445382.1) and F. sp. (MT672436.1), between Strain 3 and some Alternaria alternata (OP364409.1, OM319513.1 and OR237169.1), between Strain 4 and V. mali (KT934361.1), V. ceratosperma (KF541093.1) and C. mali (OQ832660.1, OQ832661.1, OQ832663.1 and OQ832664.1), and between Strain 5 and some Diplodia seriata (such as MT587370.1, MK993419.1, MT023570.1 and MN634031.1) are all higher than 99% (Table 1). Moreover, the ITS of Strain 6 shares more than 99% similarity with ITSs of F. fujikuroi (MW405871.1) and several F. proliferatum strains (such as MG543772.1, MG543734.1, MW563764.1 and OM866009.1).
A phylogenetic tree was further constructed using these ITS sequences (Figure 4). Results revealed that Strains 1–6 are close to C. mali (OQ832663.1), F. cf. solani (ON037470.1), A. alternata (OR237169.1), C. mali (OQ832661.1), D. seriata (MN634031.1), and F. proliferatum (OM866009.1), respectively. Therefore, the isolated Strain 1 and Strain 4 are identified as C. mali, and the Strains 2, 3, 5 and 6 are identified as F. cf. solani, A. alternata, D. seriata and F. proliferatum, respectively.

3.4. Apple Canker Disease Pathogenicity Assay Results

Fungal plugs of the six candidate fungi were inoculated onto trunks of one-year ‘Fuji’ apple tree to verify their pathogenicity. No obvious disease symptom was found within the early two months after fungal inoculation (from January 2024 to February 2024). However, at three months post inoculation (March 2024), apple trunks inoculated with Strain 1, Strain 3 and Strain 4 showed obvious canker symptoms and these canker areas spread rapidly (Figure 5A), which may be related to the gradual increase of temperature [15]. Typical apple canker disease symptoms, including light brown disease rings at the inoculation site and water-stained infected area, were observed (Figure 5A). However, cracked bark was only found in Strain 1 inoculated apple trunks (Figure 5A). The pathogenicity incidence of Strain 1 was 80% (Figure 5B), accounting for double that of Strain 3 and Strain 4. Moreover, although no significant difference was found among the canker areas caused by the three fungi, the average canker area caused by them followed the order of Strain 1 > Strain 3 > Strain 4 (Figure 5B). These indicated that the pathogenicity of the three causal agents varied. These three fungi were successfully re-isolated and purified from diseased regions, which fulfilled their Koch’s postulates of causing apple canker disease.

3.5. Pathogenicity Assay Results of A. alternata in Causing Apple Fruit and Leaf Diseases

To investigate the pathogenicity of A. alternata (Strain 3) in causing fruit and leaf diseases, we further conducted inoculation experiments on apple fruits and leaves. Results showed that Strain 3 inoculation led to severe fruit rot (Figure 5C) and leaf spot diseases (Figure 5D). Notably, its causal water-stained rot symptoms spread very fast, being able to rot the whole fruit at 10 dpi (Figure 5C). These results indicated that A. alternata can not only cause diseases in apple fruits and leaves, but also canker disease in apple trunks.

4. Discussion

In this study, to identify pathogens causing apple canker disease in the Shanxi province of China, fungal isolation and purification, and pathogenicity assays, were performed. The six candidate pathogens identified in our present study all have been reported to be pathogens causing apple diseases. Among them, C. mali has been recognized as the dominant pathogen of AVC [18]; F. cf. solani was reported to be a causal agent of apple replant disease (ARD) [27]; F. proliferatum was identified as a pathogen that causes ARD, apple bud-base rot and twig blight [28,29]; A. alternata has been reported to be a causal pathogen for apple Alternaria blotch disease, calyx rot, core rot, and so on [30,31,32]; and D. seriata has been reported to cause apple cankers and dieback, postharvest apple fruit decay, black rot canker and black spot diseases [33,34,35,36,37]. However, only the Koch’s postulates of C. mali (Strain 1 and Strain 4) and A. alternata causing apple canker disease were completed in our study, indicating that these three fungi are the causal agents of the apple canker disease there.
Cytospora can cause canker or dieback diseases in more than 130 woody plant species [38]. Among them, apple canker disease caused by Cytospora/Valsa species is the severest disease threatening the apple industry worldwide [16]. Although the Cytospora/Valsa species causing canker disease in different apple producing areas varied, Cytospora/Valsa mali was usually identified as the most dominant [39]. In this study, we confirmed that two C. mali strains (Strain 1 and Strain 4) are causal agents of apple canker disease in Shanxi province of China. Moreover, we found that the pathogenicity incidence of Strain 1 is higher than that of Strain 4, and the cankered symptoms caused by it are also more severe than Strain 4. This indicated that the pathogenicity incidences and symptoms caused by different C. mali strains varied. In addition to C. mali, some other Cytospora spp. have also been reported to have the ability to cause apple canker disease. For example, Azizi et al. [40] found that C. balanejica could infect several apple varieties and cause sunken and discolored bark and wood. They also found that the pathogenicity of C. balanejica varied in different apple varieties, i.e., causing the severest disease symptoms in ‘M4’ apple plants and the mildest symptoms in ‘Golden Delicious’ apple plants. Hanifeh et al. [41] reported that C. avicennae, C. azerbaijanica, C. ershadii, C. iranica, C. chrysosperma, C. parasitica and C. Parasitica, can all cause AVC on apple plants.
In addition to Cytospora/Valsa, Diplodia species have also been identified as pathogens causing apple canker disease [30]. D. intermedia was the main pathogen causing AVC in commercial orchards in southwestern Ontario of Canada [42]. D. seriata infection would lead to smoky canker symptoms in Indian apple trees [34], such as water soaked incisions, and yellow to brown discoloration of incision sites and so on. However, in our study, no apple canker disease symptom was caused by our isolated D. seriata strain in inoculated trunks of ‘Fuji’ apple plants, indicating that D. seriata is not a causal agent of apple canker disease in this apple variety. There are also some reports about the apple canker disease causal fungi from some other genus. For example, Karlstrom et al. [43] found that Neonectria ditissima can cause canker in apples and other broad-leaved trees.
In China, the main pathogens causing apple canker disease were reported to be Cytospora/Valsa mali [1,44]. Liang et al. [45] reported that C. mali weakens apple trees and significantly reduces apple production in China and other East Asian countries. Zhao et al. [46] confirmed that C. mali could infect ‘Jin hong’ apples, and their infected tissues would gradually dry out, collapse slightly, and finally form localized cankers and even whole apple tree death. In recent years, canker disease has seriously influenced the yield and quality of apples in Shanxi province of China. In Mengxian County of Shanxi Province, V. mali is identified as a pathogen causing apple canker disease [47]. In this study, we found that the causal pathogens in cankered ‘Fuji’ apples in Linyi County, Yuncheng city of Shanxi Province included two C. mali strains and one A. alternata strain. This suggests that the prevention and control methods for apple canker disease in different apple producing areas should not be the same.
A. alternata can cause a variety of plant diseases [48]. At present, it has been reported to be pathogens causing wolfberry root rot disease [49], kiwifruit soft rot [50], pitaya fungal stem end rot disease [51], cotton stem blight [52], jujube rot disease [53], cherry tomato black rot disease [54], and so on. In apples, A. alternata has also been proven to be associated with several fungal diseases, including apple Alternaria blotch disease [55], postharvest fruit rot [56], fruit body rot and calyx rot [57]. Our study revealed that A. alternata can not only cause apple fruit rot and leaf spot diseases, but can also cause apple canker disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on apple canker disease caused by A. alternata in China. Therefore, attention should also be paid to A. alternata in preventing and controlling apple canker disease in the future.

5. Conclusions

In this study, to provide a basis for the prevention and control of apple canker disease in Shanxi province, we performed causal fungal pathogen isolation and identification experiments. Two C. mali strains were identified as causal agents of apple canker disease. Moreover, for the first time, A. alternata was demonstrated to be a causal agent of apple canker disease in China. Our study can provide a basis for the prevention and control of apple canker disease and can be helpful in guiding pesticide selection and application for controlling this disease.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision and Writing—Original draft preparation, Z.L.; Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation and Writing—Original draft preparation, H.L.; Methodology and Investigation, J.Z.; Validation and Data curation, S.Z.; Resources, Validation and Data curation, Q.Z.; Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition and Writing—Review and editing, C.C.; Conceptualization, Resources, Writing—Original draft preparation, Supervision, Project administration and Funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Shanxi province (202302140601010), the PhD Introduction Research Start-up Project of Shanxi Agricultural University (2023BQ117) and the Fund for High-level Talents of Shanxi Agricultural University (2021XG010).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumari, N.; Kumar, M.; Rais, N.; Puri, S.; Sharma, K.; Natta, S.; Dhumal, S.; Damale, R.; Kumar, S.; Senapathy, M. Exploring apple pectic polysaccharides: Extraction, characterization, and biological activities—A comprehensive review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 255, 128011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, M.; Guo, J.; He, J.; Xu, C.; Li, J.; Mi, C.; Tao, S. Possible impact of climate change on apple yield in Northwest China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2020, 139, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hussain, S.Z.; Naseer, B.; Qadri, T.; Fatima, T.; Bhat, T.A. Apples (Pyrus malus)—Morphology, taxonomy, composition and health benefits. In Fruits Grown in Highland Regions of the Himalayas: Nutritional and Health Benefits; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 17–34. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang, X.; Zhang, R.; Gleason, M.L.; Sun, G. Sustainable apple disease management in China: Challenges and future directions for a transforming industry. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jin, S.; Li, W.; Cao, Y.; Jones, G.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Chang, Q.; Yang, G.; Frewer, L.J. Identifying barriers to sustainable apple production: A stakeholder perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 302, 114082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, Y.; Li, J.; Shan, X.; Wang, H.; Duan, Y. Bioactivities evaluation of an endophytic bacterial strain Bacillus tequilensis QNF2 inhibiting apple ring rot caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea on postharvest apple fruits. Food Microbiol. 2024, 123, 104590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Manzoor, S.; Nabi, S.U.; Baranwal, V.K.; Verma, M.K.; Parveen, S.; Rather, T.R.; Raja, W.H.; Shafi, M. Overview on century progress in research on mosaic disease of apple (Malus domestica Borkh) incited by apple mosaic virus/apple necrotic mosaic virus. Virology 2023, 587, 109846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Omaye, J.D.; Ogbuju, E.; Ataguba, G.; Jaiyeoba, O.; Aneke, J.; Oladipo, F. Cross-comparative review of machine learning for plant disease detection: Apple, cassava, cotton and potato plants. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2024, 12, 127–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nwe, L.L.; Casonato, S.; Jones, E.E. Endophytic fungal isolates from apple tissue: Latent pathogens lurking within? Fungal Biol. 2024, 128, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Feng, H.; Wang, C.; He, Y.; Tang, L.; Han, P.; Liang, J.; Huang, L. Apple Valsa canker: Insights into pathogenesis and disease control. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Togashi, K. Some studies on a Japanese apple canker and its causal fungus, Valsa mali. J. Coll. Agric. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. Sapporo Jpn. 1925, 12, 265–324. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, F.; Chen, C.; Shi, X.; Guo, J.; Xing, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y. Studies on the latent infection of the causal organism of Valsa canker of apple. Acta Phytophylacica Sin. 1979, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Suzaki, K. Population structure of Valsa ceratosperma, causal fungus of Valsa canker, in apple and pear orchards. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2008, 74, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.; Shi, C.-M.; Gleason, M.L.; Huang, L. Fungal species associated with apple Valsa canker in East Asia. Phytopathol. Res. 2020, 2, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abe, K.; Kotoda, N.; Kato, H.; Soejima, J. Resistance sources to Valsa canker (Valsa ceratosperma) in a germplasm collection of diverse Malus species. Plant Breed. 2007, 126, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.; Wei, J.; Huang, L.; Kang, Z. Re-evaluation of pathogens causing Valsa canker on apple in China. Mycologia 2011, 103, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sha, S.S.; Wang, Z.; Yan, C.C.; Hao, H.T.; Wang, L.; Feng, H.Z. Identification of fungal species associated with apple canker in Tarim Basin, China. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 1284–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bozorov, T.A.; Toshmatov, Z.O.; Kahar, G.; Muhammad, S.M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Aytenov, I.S.; Turakulov, K.S. Uncovering the antifungal activities of wild apple-associated bacteria against two canker-causing fungi, Cytospora mali and C. parasitica. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nourian, A.; Salehi, M.; Safaie, N.; Khelghatibana, F.; Abdollahzadeh, J. Fungal canker agents in apple production hubs of Iran. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ilyukhin, E.; Schneider, K.; Ellouze, W. First report of Botryosphaeria dothidea causing stem canker and dieback of apple trees in Ontario, Canada. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mang, S.M.; Marcone, C.; Maxim, A.; Camele, I. Investigations on fungi isolated from apple trees with die-back symptoms from Basilicata region (Southern Italy). Plants 2022, 11, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Peng, H.; Wei, X.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Biggs, A.; Gleason, M.; Shang, S.; Zhu, M.; Guo, Y.; Sun, G. Management of Valsa canker on apple with adjustments to potassium nutrition. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 884–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, M. Production efficiency and change characteristics of China’s apple industry in terms of planting scale. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Sheng, O.; Liu, F.; Qiu, D.; Lü, P.; Deng, G.; Cheng, C. A new leaf blight disease caused by Alternaria jacinthicola on banana in China. Horticulturae 2021, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetices. PCR Protoc. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, M.; Xiang, L.; Tang, W.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Yin, C.; Mao, Z. Apple-Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis confers resistance to Fusarium solani by inducing defense response and elevating nitrogen absorption. Physiol. Plant. 2024, 176, e14355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Duan, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, R.; Chen, X.; Yin, C.; Mao, Z. Discovery of Fusarium proliferatum f. sp. Malus domestica causing apple replant disease in China. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2958–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhai, H. First report of twig blight caused by Fusarium proliferatum on ‘Yanfu 3′ apple. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, T.; He, Y.; Zeng, X.; Cai, B.; Qu, S.; Wang, S. Comparative analysis of alternative splicing in two contrasting apple cultivars defense against Alternaria alternata apple pathotype infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gur, L.; Reuveni, M.; Cohen, Y. β-Aminobutyric acid induced resistance against Alternaria fruit rot in apple fruits. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shtienberg, D. Effects of host physiology on the development of core rot, caused by Alternaria alternata, in red delicious apples. Phytopathol. Res. 2012, 102, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lódolo, X.V.; Lutz, M.C.; Mondino, P.; Ousset, J.; Sosa, M.C. First report of Diplodia seriata, Diplodia mutila, and Dothiorella omnivora associated with apple cankers and dieback in Rio Negro, Argentina. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bhat, A.H.; Shah, M.; Padder, B.; Shah, Z.A.; Dar, E.A.; Fayaz, U.; Nain, M.S.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Hemaid, F.M.; Stępień, P.; et al. Morphological, pathogenic and genetic diversity in Diplodia seriata associated with black rot canker of apple in India. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vučković, N.; Vico, I.; Duduk, B.; Duduk, N. Diversity of Botryosphaeriaceae and Diaporthe species associated with postharvest apple fruit decay in Serbia. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 929–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Úrbez-Torres, J.; Boulé, J.; O’Gorman, D. First report of Diplodia seriata and D. mutila causing apple dieback in British Columbia. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1243. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu, Z.-C.; Zhang, W.-B.; Yue, J.; Yi, Z.-B. Identification of Diplodia seriata causing black spot on branches and trunks of apple trees in Xinjiang. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2020, 50, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kianfé, B.Y.; Tchamgoue, J.; Narmani, A.; Teponno, R.B.; Njouonkou, A.-L.; Stadler, M.; Fogue Kouam, S. Bioactive secondary metabolites from fungi of the genus Cytospora Ehrenb. (Ascomycota). Molecules 2023, 28, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, T.; Huang, W.; Yu, H. Synergetic antimicrobial effect of silver nanoparticles conjugated with iprodione against Valsa mali. Materials 2022, 15, 5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Azizi, R.; Ghosta, Y.; Ahmadpour, A. Apple crown and collar canker and necrosis caused by Cytospora balanejica sp. nov. in Iran. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hanifeh, S.; Zafari, D.; Soleimani, M.-J.; Arzanlou, M. Multigene phylogeny, morphology, and pathogenicity trials reveal novel Cytospora species involved in perennial canker disease of apple trees in Iran. Fungal Biol. 2022, 126, 707–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ellouze, W.; Ilyukhin, E.; Sulman, M.; Ali, S. First report of Diplodia intermedia causing canker and dieback diseases on apple trees in Canada. Plant Dis. 2024, 108, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Karlström, A.; Papp-Rupar, M.; Passey, T.A.; Deakin, G.; Xu, X. Quantitative trait loci associated with apple endophytes during pathogen infection. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1054914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, L.; Meng, Y.; Liu, R.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L. Inhibitory effects of Bacillus vallismortis T27 against apple Valsa canker caused by Valsa mali. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 195, 105564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liang, X.; Lin, Y.; Yu, W.; Yang, M.; Meng, X.; Yang, W.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, R.; Sun, G. Chaetoglobosin A contributes to the antagonistic action of Chaetomium globosum strain 61239 toward the apple Valsa canker pathogen Cytospora mali. Phytopathol. Res. 2023, 113, 1494–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhao, J.; Guo, Y.; Li, Z.; Shi, Y.; Sun, P. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome profiling reveals mechanisms underlying the infection of Cytospora mali in “Jin Hong” branches. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1394447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yuan, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Yang, J.; Hu, H.; Zhang, G. Identification and antagonistic studies on a pathogenic fungus causing Apple Valsa canker. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2017, 33, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  48. DeMers, M. Alternaria alternata as endophyte and pathogen. Microbiology 2022, 168, 001153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Uwaremwe, C.; Yue, L.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Z.; Wang, R. Molecular identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium and Alternaria species associated with root rot disease of wolfberry in Gansu and Ningxia provinces, China. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, W.; Long, Y.; Yin, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, R.; Mo, F.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, T.; Chen, J.; Wang, B.; et al. Antifungal activity and mechanism of tetramycin against Alternaria alternata, the soft rot causing fungi in kiwifruit. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 192, 105409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Luu, T.A.; Phi, Q.T.; Nguyen, T.T.H.; Dinh, M.V.; Pham, B.N.; Do, Q.T. Antagonistic activity of endophytic bacteria isolated from weed plant against stem end rot pathogen of pitaya in Vietnam. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2021, 31, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laidou, I.; Koulakiotu, E.; Thanassoulopoulos, C. First report of stem canker caused by Alternaria alternata on cotton. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, D.; Li, P.; Liu, D.; Si, X. First report of Alternaria alternata causing postharvest black spot rot of jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) in Lu’an, Anhui Province. J. Plant Pathol. 2021, 103, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qi, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Liu, W. Curcumin: An innovative approach for postharvest control of Alternaria alternata induced black rot in cherry tomatoes. Fungal Biol. 2024, 128, 1691–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, L.; Li, X.; Guo, W.; Shi, J.; Chen, W.; Lei, Y.; Ma, Y.; Dai, H. MdWRKY120 enhance apple susceptibility to Alternaria alternata. Plants 2022, 11, 3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, H.; Fu, L.; Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Narcisse, K.E.; Qi, H.; Han, C.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; Zhu, C. Tannic acid exerts antifungal activity in vitro and in vivo against Alternaria alternata causing postharvest rot on apple fruit. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 125, 102012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gur, L.; Reuveni, M.; Cohen, Y. Phenology-based management of Alternaria fruit rot in pink lady apples. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jof 10 00536 g001
Figure 1. Typical apple canker disease symptoms (A–D) and cankered apple shoot and bud samples used for pathogen isolation in this study (E–I). (A): typical canker symptom on apple trunk; (B,C): cankers on branch surface; (D): dieback of twigs; (E): severe cankered apple shoot; (F): severe cankered apple shoot with cracked bark; (G): severe diseased bud; (H,I): mild diseased buds with slight reddish-brown cankers. Scale bar = 0.5 cm (for (E–I)).
Figure 1. Typical apple canker disease symptoms (A–D) and cankered apple shoot and bud samples used for pathogen isolation in this study (E–I). (A): typical canker symptom on apple trunk; (B,C): cankers on branch surface; (D): dieback of twigs; (E): severe cankered apple shoot; (F): severe cankered apple shoot with cracked bark; (G): severe diseased bud; (H,I): mild diseased buds with slight reddish-brown cankers. Scale bar = 0.5 cm (for (E–I)).
Jof 10 00536 g001
Jof 10 00536 g002
Figure 2. The growth of isolated fungi on PDA media. (A): Strain 1–6 cultured on PDA medium for different days; (B): growth curve (left) and polynomial regression model (right) for the growth of the six isolated fungi on PDA media. In (A), scale bar = 3 cm.
Figure 2. The growth of isolated fungi on PDA media. (A): Strain 1–6 cultured on PDA medium for different days; (B): growth curve (left) and polynomial regression model (right) for the growth of the six isolated fungi on PDA media. In (A), scale bar = 3 cm.
Jof 10 00536 g002
Jof 10 00536 g003
Figure 3. Mycelia and conidia observation results for the six isolated fungi. (A): Mycelia at the edge of the PDA dish; (B): Morphology of mycelia and conidia. 1–6 is for Strain 1–6, respectively.
Figure 3. Mycelia and conidia observation results for the six isolated fungi. (A): Mycelia at the edge of the PDA dish; (B): Morphology of mycelia and conidia. 1–6 is for Strain 1–6, respectively.
Jof 10 00536 g003
Jof 10 00536 g004
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree constructed using ITS sequences of Strain 1~6 and their homologous sequences. Red five-pointed stars are for the isolated fungi in this study.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree constructed using ITS sequences of Strain 1~6 and their homologous sequences. Red five-pointed stars are for the isolated fungi in this study.
Jof 10 00536 g004
Jof 10 00536 g005
Figure 5. Pathogenicity assay results of Strain 1, Strain 3 and Strain 4. (A): canker symptoms caused by Strain 1, Strain 3, and Strain 4. CK is inoculated with PDA plug as control. (B): Canker disease incidences and areas caused by Strain 1, Strain 3, and Strain 4. (C): Fruit rot symptoms caused by Strain 3. PDA plugs were inoculated on the left part of apples as control. Fruit from left to right is apple at 1, 5 and 10 dpi, respectively. (D): Leaf spot symptoms caused by Strain 3. PDA plugs were inoculated on the on the left part of leaves as control. Leaf from left to right was photographed at 1, 2 and 3 dpi, respectively. In (A,C,D), scale bar = 3 cm. In (B–D), different letters above columns represent significant difference at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 5. Pathogenicity assay results of Strain 1, Strain 3 and Strain 4. (A): canker symptoms caused by Strain 1, Strain 3, and Strain 4. CK is inoculated with PDA plug as control. (B): Canker disease incidences and areas caused by Strain 1, Strain 3, and Strain 4. (C): Fruit rot symptoms caused by Strain 3. PDA plugs were inoculated on the left part of apples as control. Fruit from left to right is apple at 1, 5 and 10 dpi, respectively. (D): Leaf spot symptoms caused by Strain 3. PDA plugs were inoculated on the on the left part of leaves as control. Leaf from left to right was photographed at 1, 2 and 3 dpi, respectively. In (A,C,D), scale bar = 3 cm. In (B–D), different letters above columns represent significant difference at p < 0.05 level.
Jof 10 00536 g005
Table 1. Blastn results for the ITSs of the six isolated fungi.
Table 1. Blastn results for the ITSs of the six isolated fungi.
StrainScientific NameQuery Cover RatioE-ValueIdentityGenbank Accession No.
Strain 1Cytospora ceratosperma97.00%0100.00%KF541093.1
Cytospora mali99.00%099.49%OQ832663.1
Valsa mali99.00%099.49%KY942187.1
Valsa mali99.00%099.49%KT934353.1
Strain 2Fusarium solani98.00%0100.00%MT638068.1
Fusarium solani98.00%0100.00%MF445382.1
Fusarium cf. solani98.00%0100.00%ON037470.1
Fusarium sp.98.00%0100.00%MT672436.1
Strain 3Alternaria alternata97.00%0100.00%OP364409.1
Alternaria alternata97.00%0100.00%OM237169.1
Alternaria arborescens98.00%099.81%MF462298.1
Alternaria alternata100.00%099.45%OM319513.1
Strain 4Valsa mali99.00%0100.00%KT934361.1
Cytospora ceratosperma97.00%0100.00%KF541093.1
Cytospora mali99.00%0100.00%OQ832663.1
Cytospora mali99.00%099.66%OQ832664.1
Cytospora mali99.00%099.66%OQ832660.1
Cytospora mali99.00%099.49%OQ832661.1
Strain 5Diplodia seriata99.00%099.44%MT587370.1
Diplodia seriata99.00%099.44%MN634031.1
Diplodia seriata99.00%099.44%MT023570.1
Diplodia seriata99.00%099.44%MK993419.1
Strain 6Fusarium proliferatum97.00%0100.00%MG543772.1
Fusarium proliferatum97.00%0100.00%MG543734.1
Fusarium proliferatum97.00%0100.00%MW563764.1
Fusarium proliferatum97.00%0100.00%OM866009.1
Fusarium fujikuroi97.00%0100.00%MW405871.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Q.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, Y. Characterization of Fungal Species Isolated from Cankered Apple Barks Demonstrates the Alternaria alternata Causing Apple Canker Disease. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080536

AMA Style

Li Z, Li H, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Cheng C, Zhang Y. Characterization of Fungal Species Isolated from Cankered Apple Barks Demonstrates the Alternaria alternata Causing Apple Canker Disease. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(8):536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080536

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhiqiang, Hao Li, Jiating Zhang, Shikai Zhang, Qi Zhao, Chunzhen Cheng, and Yongyan Zhang. 2024. "Characterization of Fungal Species Isolated from Cankered Apple Barks Demonstrates the Alternaria alternata Causing Apple Canker Disease" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 8: 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10080536

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop