Next Article in Journal
Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in Argentina
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target
Previous Article in Journal
An Overview of Sex Bias in C. neoformans Infections
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 4
Issue 2
10.3390/jof4020050
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lipid Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target

by
Jiao Pan
1,2,*,
Cuiting Hu
1 and
Jae-Hyuk Yu
3,*
1
Department of Microbiology, College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2
Key Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300071, China
3
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020050
Submission received: 23 March 2018 / Revised: 17 April 2018 / Accepted: 18 April 2018 / Published: 20 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal-Unique Pathways and Their Utilization for the Development of Novel Antifungals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lipids, commonly including phospholipids, sphingolipids, fatty acids, sterols, and triacylglycerols (TAGs), are important biomolecules for the viability of all cells. Phospholipids, sphingolipids, and sterols are important constituents of biological membranes. Many lipids play important roles in the regulation of cell metabolism by acting as signaling molecules. Neutral lipids, including TAGs and sterol esters (STEs), are important storage lipids in cells. In view of the importance of lipid molecules, this review briefly summarizes the metabolic pathways for sterols, phospholipids, sphingolipids, fatty acids, and neutral lipids in fungi and illustrates the differences between fungal and human (or other mammalian) cells, especially in relation to lipid biosynthetic pathways. These differences might provide valuable clues for us to find target proteins for novel antifungal drugs. In addition, the development of lipidomics technology in recent years has supplied us with a shortcut for finding new antifungal drug targets; this ability is important for guiding our research on pathogenic fungi.

1. Introduction

The increasing number of immunocompromised patients has led to the emergence of many forms of fungal infections in recent years. The causative fungi are most commonly dermatophytic (Epidermophyton, Microsporum, or Trichophyton species) or saprophytic species (Aspergillus, Blastomyces, Candida, Coccidioides, Paracoccidioides, Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, or Sporothrix species). The saprophytes are also capable of causing systemic infections, which pose a great threat to human health under certain conditions [1]. Furthermore, a restricted arsenal of antifungals is available, and the development of resistance to antifungal drugs is increasing, which makes it imperative to discover new antifungal targets.
The existence of the cell wall in fungi is the most significant structural difference between fungi and mammalian cells. The main components of the fungal cell wall are β-1,3-glucan, chitin, and various glycoproteins, which are essential for the integrity of the cell wall and the maintenance of intracellular osmotic pressure. Therefore, disrupting the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall has been an important strategy for the development of antifungal drugs. For example, the echinocandins, clinically important fungal inhibitors, are able to inhibit the synthesis of fungal β-1,3-glucan and thus abolish the integrity of the cell wall. Although the cell wall is important for fungi, from a lipid perspective, the plasma membrane is important as it contains the enzymes and proteins responsible for the cell wall biosynthesis [2,3]. In this review, we focus on the fungal metabolic pathways for lipids, including phospholipids, sphingolipids, fatty acids, and neutral lipids, and how the biosynthetic portions of these pathways differ from those of mammalian cells. Specific enzymes or proteins necessary for fungal lipid metabolism might have great potential to be antifungal targets. As important constituents of cellular membranes, lipids also have been proven to be targets of antifungals, which will be discussed here. Furthermore, some important lipid signaling molecules can regulate cell proliferation and/or cell death, which is tightly linked to the virulence and pathogenicity of the fungus. Thus, interference with these regulatory mechanisms may be an effective means of coping with fungal infections.

2. Classification and Function of Lipids

2.1. Classification of Lipids

There are many kinds of naturally occurring lipid molecules with great differences in their chemical structures and physical properties. In 2005, to advance the development of lipidomics, the International Lipid Classification and Nomenclature Committee (ILCNC) classified lipids into eight categories: fatty acyls (FAs), glycerolipids (GLs), glycerophospholipids (GPs), sphingolipids (SLs), sterol lipids (STs), saccharolipids (SLs), prenol lipids (PRs), and polyketides (PKs) [4]. Among these categories, fatty acids, phospholipids, sphingolipids, glycerolipids, and sterols are common lipid molecules in cells (the basic structures of the main lipid groups are shown in Figure 1), while saccharolipids, prenol lipids, and polyketides are mainly found in bacteria, fungi, and plants [5].
Lipids are organic molecules that are insoluble in water but soluble in nonpolar organic solvents and have hydrophobic or amphiphilic properties; the physical properties of lipids determine their physiological function in cells. As important storage lipids in cells, triacylglycerols (TAGs) and sterol esters (STEs) are esterified forms of free fatty acids and sterols, respectively. These lipids are uncharged and less toxic to cells. Sphingolipids and phospholipids are amphiphilic lipids with fatty acyl chains that form hydrophobic cores and with the hydrophilic heads exposed to the environment; these types of lipids constitute the main backbone of cell membranes and, therefore, are important structural lipids in cells.

2.2. Function of Lipids

Of the total number of genes in cells, 5% are related to the metabolism of lipid molecules [6], not only reflecting the complex varieties of lipid molecules but also suggesting their important biological functions in cells. Therefore, it is conceivable that selective interference with the metabolism of lipid molecules can effectively inhibit the survival of pathogenic fungi in host cells.
First, lipid molecules are important for energy storage in cells. The β-oxidation of fatty acid chains provides a large amount of ATP, which allows other biological activities of cells to proceed properly. Fatty acids are the simplest lipid molecules in cells and are important building blocks of complex lipids such as phospholipids and sphingolipids. Surplus intracellular free fatty acids are stored in lipid droplets (LDs) [7] in the form of TAGs and STEs. LDs are not only an important energy reservoir for cells but are also an organelle closely related to lipid metabolism. A large number of hydrolases involved in the degradation of TAGs and STEs are located on the membrane and mobilize the decomposition of these two nonpolar lipids when needed [8].
Second, the glycerophospholipid bilayer constitutes the basic skeleton of the cell membrane, which isolates the cell from the external environment and ensures the independence of biochemical reactions as well as the formation of internal compartments in which different biological functions can be completed without interference. Glycerophospholipids can be further divided into phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), and so on, based on their head groups. In eukaryotic cells, the content and types of phospholipids vary in the membranes of different organelles and the plasma membrane. The major phospholipids in total cell extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are PC, PE, PI, and PS (Table 1) [9]. In addition to glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids and sterols are also important components of cell membranes. They aggregate dynamically to form lipid rafts, which regulate downstream signaling molecules and increase the efficiency of signal transduction [10]. Lipid rafts also play an important role in pathogenicity by containing many of the virulence factors of fungi. In Cryptococcus neoformans, Pma1 is a proton pump that maintains the intracellular pH of fungal cells in the physiological range. Pma1 is a raft-localized protein and its association with rafts is required for surface delivery and protein stability in the plasma membrane. Mutants of C. neoformans in which Pma1 was not functioning properly showed attenuated virulence, likely due to their inability to survive in the acidic environment of the phagolysosome [11]. Moreover, sterols are able to regulate the fluidity and permeability of cell membranes. The structural function of lipid molecules in cells is irreplaceable. Recent studies in HeLa cells have shown that the fraction of lipids such as PI and PC in membrane systems changes during the critical phases of the cell cycle. It was shown that 11 kinds of lipids, for example, phosphatidic acid (PA) (16:0/16:0), diacylglycerol (DAG) (16:1, 12:0, 18:1), and PS (18:0/20:4) accumulate in dividing cells. The composition and localization of lipids are remodulated during the cell cycle. Therefore, the lipid composition of the cell membrane structure itself is very important to the cell [12,13].
Finally, lipids such as fatty acids [14,15], sterols [16], phospholipids [17], and sphingolipids [18] are important signaling molecules in cells and participate in intracellular signal transduction. Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and di-acyl-glycerol (DAG), which originate from phosphatidylinositol 4,5-diphosphate, are very important signaling molecules. IP3-Ca2+-DAG-dependent protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylates numerous downstream proteins; the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades have important regulatory functions for cell wall integrity and oxidative stress responses [19,20]. DAG is also a key intermediate lipid metabolite and is involved in the regulation of lipid metabolism [16]. In response to the catalytic activity of different kinds of phospholipases, PC can be cleaved into various second messenger molecules such as lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), phosphatidic acid (PA), and arachidonic acid (AA). These signaling molecules are responsible for the regulation of many biological processes within the cell [18]. Furthermore, ceramide (Cer), sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), glycosphingolipids (GSLs), and other sphingolipid molecules are involved in vital activities such as cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, protein synthesis, glucose metabolism, and stress response [21].
Polyketides, lipid molecules that are not present in all eukaryotic cells, might be unfamiliar because they are not commonly thought of as lipids but rather as secondary metabolites in microorganisms or plants. However, polyketides are of great significance for the virulence of pathogenic fungi. Dihydroxynaphthalene is a multi-polyketide compound in Aspergillus fumigatus; the gene encoding the responsible polyketide synthase (PKS) is essential for the synthesis of dihydroxynaphthalene, and the knockout of PKS resulted in a pigmentation deficiency in the asexual spores. These pigment-free conidia are more susceptible to engulfment by immune cells [22]. Therefore, melanin is an important virulence factor in A. fumigatus [23]. The targeting of melanin production is an effective antifungal means for weakening the virulence and pathogenicity of pathogenic fungi.
The energy storage, signaling, and structural roles described above are three common functions of lipid molecules in almost all organisms. The disruption of lipid metabolism leads to the collapse of the entire cellular system. However, when we explore the antifungal targets in pathogenic fungi, both the inhibitory effect on fungi and the damage caused to the host need to be considered. Therefore, we summarize specific metabolic pathways within fungi that differ from those in mammalian cells and thus have the potential to be antifungal drug targets. The study of lipid function in eukaryotic cells instructs us in the exploration of effective mechanisms for fighting pathogenic fungi.

3. Specific Lipid Metabolism in Fungi

3.1. Metabolism of Ergosterol in Fungi

The most important sterols in fungal and mammalian cells are ergosterol and cholesterol, respectively. Inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol in fungi not only results in the structural disruption of the fungal cell membrane but also interferes with the functional organization of lipid rafts. The interaction of lipid rafts with proteins in a distinct biophysical environment may change the raft-localized proteins’ conformation and bioactivity—Pma1 in C. neoforman, for example. It can thereby cause great damage to fungal cells with minimal effects on human cells. The inhibition of ergosterol synthesis is the mode of action of many antifungal drugs, such as the azoles, the allylamines, and the morpholines. As shown in Figure 2, different drugs interfere with the specific process of ergosterol biosynthesis in Saccharomycetes [24]. The azoles have an inhibitory effect on cytochrome P450-dependent lanosterol 14α-demethylase, the allylamines and thiocarbamates inhibit squalene epoxidase, and amorolfin and other morpholine drugs have inhibitory effects on sterol Δ14-reductase and sterol Δ8,Δ7-isomerase. Distinct from these, the polyene macrolides, such as amphotericin B, are able to bind ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane, thereby forming hydrophilic channels that change the permeability of the cell membrane and resulting in the outflow of intracellular contents [25]. These drugs are clinically important inhibitors for the treatment of infection induced by pathogenic fungi. However, the development and use of these antifungal drugs are accompanied by several issues: (i) toxic side effects to the human body are easily produced; for example, amphotericin B inhibits fungi effectively with a broad-spectrum antifungal effect but is more toxic to the liver and kidneys in humans than are other drugs [26]; (ii) pathogens easily become tolerant to drugs, especially the azoles, which just cause temporary damage to pathogenic fungi but are not able to kill them directly, allowing the pathogens to rebound easily and develop antifungal resistance; and (iii) some of these drugs cannot be taken orally: the use of the echinocandins does not readily result in fungal resistance, and these drugs are less toxic to patients, but they must be administered intravenously [1]. The emergence of liposomal formulations of amphotericin B and combined antifungal therapy is destined to solve these limitations and expand the clinical applications of these drugs [27,28,29,30].

3.2. Metabolism of Phospholipids in Fungi

Phospholipids, which are the most abundant lipids in cells, comprise 40–60% of lipids in eukaryotic cells [6]. The metabolism of phospholipids in cells is very complicated, and there are substantial differences in the metabolic pathways in fungal and mammalian cells. It is necessary to clarify the metabolic network of phospholipids in fungal cells (Figure 3). The numbers in Figure 3 represent the catalytic enzymes in each reaction. Details of the enzymes are listed in Table 2.
The anabolism of phospholipid molecules begins with PA. The de novo synthesis of PA is via the two-step acylation of glycerol 3-phosphate (G-3-P) or dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) (① and ②). CDP-DAG (Cytidine diphosphate-diacylglycerol) synthase catalyzes the reaction between the substrates PA and cytidine triphosphate (CTP) that synthesizes CDP-DAG (⑤), which is the donor of the phosphatidyl group. Under the action of the corresponding enzymes, inositol (Ins), glycerol 3-phosphate, and serine act as head groups in the generation of PI (⑥), phosphatidylglycerol phosphate (PGP) (⑦), and PS (⑩), respectively. PGP is dephosphorylated by the action of phosphatase to form phosphatidylglycerol (PG), and PG is condensed with a molecule of CDP-DAG to form cardiolipin (CL) (⑨). In S. cerevisiae, PS is an important substrate for PC synthesis. PS is converted to PE by phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (⑪) and then synthesized through a three-step methylation reaction that is dependent on S-adenosylmethionine. The first step in the methylation reaction is catalyzed by phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase (⑫), encoded by CHO2, and the latter two steps are catalyzed by the OPI3-encoded phospholipid methyltransferase (⑬); this pathway is the endogenous pathway for the synthesis of PC driven by methylation reactions and is the main source of PC in S. cerevisiae. An alternative pathway for PC synthesis is the Kennedy pathway, in which exogenously obtained ethanolamine (Etn) or choline (Cho) are phosphorylated to generate phosphoethanolamine (P-Etn) (⑯) or phosphocholine (P-Cho) (⑲), respectively, under the action of the corresponding kinases. P-Etn or P-Cho binds to a single molecule of CTP to generate cytidine diphosphate ethanolamine (CDP-Etn) (⑰) or cytidine diphosphocholine (CDP-Cho) (⑳), respectively; these reactions are catalyzed by a cytidylyltransferase, and CDP-Etn and CDP-Cho finally react with DAG to form PE (⑱) or PC (㉑), respectively. In the reverse reaction, PC can be decomposed into DAG and PA under catalysis by phospholipase C (PLC) (㉒) and phospholipase D (PLD) (㉓), respectively [31].
PS synthase (⑩), PS decarboxylase (⑪), and phospholipid methylase (⑬), shown with bold arrows in Figure 3, have been reported in the literature as potential antifungal targets [32]. The Candida albicans PS synthase mutant, Δcho1, lacking PS, has a decreased PE content and is avirulent in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis. The Δcho1 mutant exhibits defects in cell wall integrity, mitochondrial function, and filamentous growth. In addition, Cho1 does not have a homolog in mammalian cells; therefore, the inhibition of Cho1 activity is likely to become a new basis for antifungal therapy. Cho1 is conserved in fungi, and its inhibitors may have a broad-spectrum antifungal effect [33,34,35]. PS is a substrate for the de novo synthesis of PE. The C. albicans PS decarboxylase cannot be expressed at all when both psd1 and psd2 are knocked out. The resulting phenotype is similar to that resulting from cho1 deletion, including reduced PE content and cell wall defects, but the decrease in virulence resulting from the former mutation is not as significant as that resulting from the latter [34]. In Aspergillus nidulans, the loss of choC (opi3 in yeast) results in severely impaired vegetative growth, swelling of the hyphal tips, and the complete blockage of asexual and sexual development. This enzyme also has no homologous protein in the human body. Therefore, ChoC has a potential to be a drug target in the treatment of aspergillosis, although the alveolar surface may provide an alternative substrate for the synthesis of phospholipids by pathogenic fungi [35]. A study in the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii found that the deficiency of PE methylase (⑫) reduced the PC content of cells and impaired the production of conidia but had no significant effect on virulence. The reason that most enzymes related to the methylation reactions in the synthesis of PC can be potential antifungal targets is that the endogenous pathway is essential for the synthesis of PC in fungal cells, while PC is mainly synthesized via the Kennedy pathway in the cells of higher eukaryotes. In humans, only 30% of PC is synthesized via the methylation pathway in liver cells, a much higher percentage than in other organs [8,36,37].

3.3. Metabolism of Sphingolipids in Fungi

Sphingolipids, which are important components of cell membranes and act as signaling molecules in cells, are a complex family of compounds that share a common structural feature, a backbone of sphingoid bases that is synthesized de novo from serine and a long-chain fatty acyl-CoA. Condensation with fatty acids via amide bonds and/or hydroxylation at position C1 of the sphingoid base gives rise to the complexity and diversity of sphingolipid molecules. Figure 4 shows the de novo synthesis of sphingolipids in S. cerevisiae [34]. The synthesis of sphingolipids begins with a reaction between palmitoyl-CoA and serine; this reaction is catalyzed by serine palmitoyl transferase (SPT) and generates 3-ketodihydrosphingosine, which is reduced to dihydrosphingosine in an NADPH-dependent manner. Dihydrosphingosine is converted to phytosphingosine by the action of hydroxylase and ceramide synthase, and then phytoceramide binds a molecule of PI to synthesize inositolphosphatyl-ceramide (IPC) through a reaction catalyzed by IPC synthase. IPC can either be further mannosylated or condensed with PI to generate the more complex sphingolipids MIPC and M(IP)2C, respectively.
Most enzymes required for the de novo synthesis of sphingolipids have homologous proteins in mammalian cells; therefore, these enzymes cannot be used as targets for antifungal drugs because of their poor selectivity. Surprisingly, IPC synthase is a specific catalytic enzyme in fungi, which is not present in the human body; therefore, it has potential to become an antifungal target [38]. Furthermore, some antifungals have already been reported to effectively inhibit pathogenic fungi. Rustimicin 48 and galbonolide B have an inhibitory effect on the IPC synthase of Cryptococcus neoformans [39]. Khafrefungin 50 has exhibited different inhibitory effects on sphingolipid synthesis in C. albicans, S. cerevisiae, and C. neoformans. These inhibitors of IPC synthase show a strong antifungal effect and excellent selectivity, but they are not active against A. fumigatus; thus, the structural remodulation of these inhibitors may broaden their antifungal spectrum [40].

3.4. Metabolism of Fatty Acids in Fungi

Fatty acids, which act as building blocks for complex lipids such as phospholipids and sphingolipids, as well as energy reservoirs and signaling molecules, are the most fundamental lipid molecules in cells. Fatty acid molecules have a common basic structure with specific diversity determined by the chain length and the degree of unsaturation, and FAs are rapidly metabolized [4]. In yeast cells, acetyl-CoA, derived either from citric acid degradation or from acetate, is carboxylated into malonyl-CoA under the action of acetyl-CoA carboxylase; this reaction is the first step in the de novo synthesis of fatty acids and occurs in the cytoplasm or in mitochondria. The enzyme catalyzing the carboxylation reaction in the cytoplasm is encoded by ACC1, whereas the acetyl-CoA carboxylase in mitochondria is encoded by HFA1. FA synthesis is carried out in the cytosol by the hexameric fatty acid synthase (FAS) complex consisting of six Fas1p and six Fas2p subunits, each of which exhibit more than one enzymatic function. In contrast, the mitochondrial FA synthase complex consists of six proteins, each having only one enzymatic activity. Both the cytosolic and the mitochondrial FAS machineries add two carbons from malonyl-CoA to a saturated acyl chain. While the mitochondrial FAS system primarily produces lipoic acid, a chain length of up to 18 carbons can be produced by the cytosolic FA synthase. Further elongation to form very long chain FA (VLCFA) of up to 26 carbons in length by the stepwise addition of two carbons from malonyl-CoA is carried out in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by different elongases. Desaturation and hydroxylation of FA also occur in the ER [9].
The fatty acid synthase of the Basidiomycete yeast C. neoformans is composed of two subunits encoded by the FAS1 and FAS2 genes. The suppression of Fas1 and Fas2 expression blocks the de novo synthesis of fatty acids and severely inhibits vegetative growth of C. neoformans. However, supplementation with exogenous fatty acids was not able to rescue cell death induced by FAS deficiency. The treatment of C. neoformans with fluconazole was shown to have an increased inhibitory activity and to even become fungicidal when expression of either FAS1 or FAS2 was suppressed. In addition, Fas1 and Fas2 are different from the fatty acid synthase in the human body and thus may be potential antifungal target proteins [41].

3.5. Metabolism of Neutral Lipids in Fungi

Neutral lipids in fungi primarily include TAGs and STEs, which are responsible for the storage of free fatty acids, sterols, and DAG. DAG originating from the breakdown of PA serves as the primary backbone for the synthesis of TAG. The last step of de novo TAG formation in yeast can be accomplished through different routes. Lro1p, a homolog of the human lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), catalyzes the transfer of an acyl group from the sn-2 position of PE or PC; this activity appears to be restricted to the ER. In an acyl-CoA-dependent reaction, the activated fatty acid can be linked to the glycerol backbone of DAG by Dga1p, which is localized to the ER and to LDs [42]. Are1p and Are2p, located in the ER, also have a minor role in the conversion of DAG to TAG, which also depends on acetyl-CoA. These two isomerases have 16% and 17% homology, respectively, with human acetyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT). Are1p and Are2p are two essential STE synthases in S. cerevisiae. Lipid analysis of Δare1 and Δare2 deletion strains revealed that Are2p and Are1p utilize sterol substrates in vivo with different efficiency; Are2p has a significant preference for ergosterol as a substrate, whereas Are1p esterifies sterol precursors (mainly lanosterol, as well as ergosterol). Nevertheless, terbinafine, an inhibitor of ergosterol biosynthesis, inhibits growth of Δare1Δare2 cells more efficiently than growth of wild-type cells. In a growth competition experiment, Δare1Δare2 cells grow more slowly than wild-type cells after several rounds of cultivation, suggesting that Are1p and Are2p or STEs, the product formed by these two enzymes, are more important in the natural environment than under laboratory conditions [43].
It is not certain whether any protein involved in the synthesis of neutral lipids has potential to be an antifungal target. However, the relationship between autophagy and TAG has already been reported in Metarhizium robertsii. It has been shown that nitrogen starvation is able to induce TAG accumulation in cells and activate autophagic activity but inhibits the internalization of LDs into vacuoles for degradation. Proteomic analysis of LDs identified an array of differentially accumulated proteins, including autophagy-related (ATG) proteins, heat shock proteins, and enzymes involved in TAG metabolism and phospholipid biosynthesis, in response to fungal growth under different nutrient conditions. This suggests that TAG metabolism and cellular nitrogen starvation are tightly related; however, the responsible mechanism is not yet clear. Further research in this field might provide new insights into the exploration of antifungal targets [44].

4. Searching for Potential Antifungal Drug Targets

The development of modern biotechnology, high-throughput sequencing, and chromatography and mass spectrometry for the separation and identification of biomolecules, as well as the cross-convergence of multiomics, have enabled new insights in the search for potential antifungal drug targets.
In 2016, Martin, K et al. combined three techniques for the discovery of anti-A. fumigatus targets: (i) modeling metabolic networks by elementary mode analysis and flux estimate approximations incorporating expression data from biochemical databank KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and Metacyc [45,46,47]; (ii) targeting metabolic genes by transcriptome analysis to identify condition-specific highly expressed enzymes [48,49,50]; and (iii) analyzing enzyme structure and interconnectedness (“hubs”) and identifying pathogen-specific enzymes using orthology relationships. Sixty-four target candidates were finally obtained. The potential antifungal target proteins associated with lipid metabolism that have been reported in the literature are listed in Table 3. The first five genes/proteins are responsible for PC synthesis via the methylation pathway and the fatty acid synthesis pathway.
Pho88 (AFUA_5G01960) is an inorganic phosphate transporter that is involved in phospholipid synthesis in A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, and other Aspergillus species [51]. The homologous gene of AFUA_3G12320 in yeast is Lpl1, which encodes a phospholipase B; Lpl1 is essential for the morphology of lipid droplets in yeast cells but is dispensable for cell survival because of the presence of other phospholipase B enzymes. However, from a clinical point of view, a phospholipase B blocker would be considered an interesting drug, because such a drug would probably block all phospholipase B activity in general, resulting in lethality [52]. In S. cerevisiae, Vtc4p is required during the fusion of inorganic phosphate-containing vesicles to the vacuolar membrane and the consequent accumulation of phosphate stored as polyphosphate (polyP) in the vacuole. In the maize pathogen U. maydis, Δvtc4 mutants were found to have reduced virulence in maize seedlings [53]; however, the loss of Vtc4 in Candida blocks the synthesis of polyP and does not lead to an enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress [54]. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine whether this protein can be considered an antifungal drug target.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In this review, we summarize fungal lipid metabolic pathways in comparison with those of humans, and discuss the specificities on which the antifungal mechanisms of the currently existing and yet-to-be-developed fungal inhibitors are based. The increased number of immunocompromised patients as a result of HIV infection or organ transplantations has attracted more and more attention to studies in this field, especially in relation to the virulence and pathogenicity of pathogenic fungi including C. neoformans, C. albicans, and A. fumigatus; such investigations create a new vision for the treatment of fungal infections. Multiomic data are becoming increasingly useful and definite with the progress of biotechnology and the aid of computer technologies including the Metatool program, YANA software package Borland JBuilder 2005, R statistics software, and so on; these advances provide more accurate and faster technical methods for the exploration of new antifungal targets and are expected to drive antifungal research.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate support from grants “National High Technology Research and Development Program” (“863” Program #2012AA022105) and “the National Science Foundation of Tianjin” 11JCYBJC09400. The work at UW was primarily supported by the Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center of Global Frontier Projects (2015M3A6A8065838).

Author Contributions

Jiao Pan, Cuiting Hu and Jae-Hyuk Yu jointly wrote and edited the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Basha, A.; Basha, F.; Ali, S.K.; Hanson, P.R.; Mitscher, L.A.; Oakley, B.R. Recent progress in the chemotherapy of human fungal diseases. Emphasis on 1,3-β-glucan synthase and chitin synthase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2013, 20, 4859–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Surarit, R.; Shepherd, M.G. The effects of azole and polyene antifungals on the plasma membrane enzymes of Candida albicans. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1987, 25, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, H.; Zhou, H.; Luo, Y.; Ouyang, H.; Hu, H.; Jin, C. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is required in Aspergillus fumigatus for morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 64, 1014–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fahy, E.; Subramaniam, S.; Brown, H.A.; Glass, C.K.; Merrill, A.H.; Murphy, R.C.; Raetz, C.R.; Russell, D.W.; Seyama, Y.; Shaw, W. A comprehensive classification system for lipids. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2005, 107, 839–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, C.; Freter, C. Lipid metabolism, apoptosis and cancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 924–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Van, M.G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112. [Google Scholar]
  7. Garbarino, J.; Sturley, S.L. Homoeostatic systems for sterols and other lipids. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 1182–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rajakumari, S.; Grillitsch, K.; Daum, G. Synthesis and turnover of non-polar lipids in yeast. Prog. Lipid Res. 2008, 47, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Klug, L.; Daum, G. Yeast lipid metabolism at a glance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bao, J.X.; Su, Y.T.; Cheng, Y.P.; Zhang, H.J.; Xie, X.P.; Chang, Y.M. Vascular sphingolipids in physiological and pathological adaptation. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 1168–1186. [Google Scholar]
  11. Farnoud, A.M.; Toledo, A.M.; Konopka, J.B.; Poeta, M.D.; London, E. Chapter seven—Raft-like membrane domains in pathogenic microorganisms. Curr. Top. Membr. 2015, 75, 233–268. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Furse, S.; Shearman, G.C. Do lipids shape the eukaryotic cell cycle? Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1863, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Furse, S. The physical influence of inositides—A disproportionate effect? J. Chem. Biol. 2015, 8, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shimano, H. Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs): Transcriptional regulators of lipid synthetic genes. Prog. Lipid Res. 2001, 40, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Duplus, E.; Glorian, M.; Forest, C. Fatty acid regulation of gene transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 30749–30752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, J.; Zhu, P. The mechanisms of the modulation of cellular functions by diacylglycerol. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 23, 38–42. [Google Scholar]
  17. Incardona, J.P.; Eaton, S. Cholesterol in signal transduction. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vance, J.E.; Vance, D.E. Phospholipid biosynthesis in mammalian cells. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004, 82, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Heinisch, J.J. Baker’s yeast as a tool for the development of antifungal kinase inhibitors—Targeting protein Kinase C and the cell integrity pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1754, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yu, J.H. Heterotrimeric G protein signaling and RGSs in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Borodzicz, S.; Czarzasta, K.; Kuch, M.; Cudnochjedrzejewska, A. Sphingolipids in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Polak, A. Melanin as a virulence factor in pathogenic fungi. Mycoses 1990, 33, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pihet, M.; Vandeputte, P.; Tronchin, G.; Renier, G.; Saulnier, P.; Georgeault, S.; Mallet, R.; Chabasse, D.; Symoens, F.; Bouchara, J.P. Melanin is an essential component for the integrity of the cell wall of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Maertens, J.A.; Boogaerts, M.A. Fungal cell wall inhibitors: Emphasis on clinical aspects. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000, 6, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ghannoum, M.A.; Rice, L.B. Antifungal agents: Mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Zotchev, S.B. Polyene macrolide antibiotics and their applications in human therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Noguchi, S.; Takahashi, N.; Ito, M.; Teshima, K.; Yamashita, T.; Michishita, Y.; Ohyagi, H.; Shida, S.; Nagao, T.; Fujishima, M. Safety and efficacy of low-dose liposomal amphotericin b as empirical antifungal therapy for patients with prolonged neutropenia. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 18, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Maertens, J.; Glasmacher, A.; Herbrecht, R.; Thiebaut, A.; Cordonnier, C.; Segal, B.H.; Killar, J.; Taylor, A.; Kartsonis, N.; Patterson, T.F. Multicenter, noncomparative study of caspofungin in combination with other antifungals as salvage therapy in adults with invasive aspergillosis. Cancer 2006, 107, 2888–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Campitelli, M.; Zeineddine, N.; Samaha, G.; Maslak, S. Combination antifungal therapy: A review of current data. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2017, 9, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tobias, J.S.; Wrioley, P.F.M.; Shaw, E. Combination antifungal therapy for Cryptococcal meningitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carman, G.M.; Han, G.S. Regulation of phospholipid synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 13293–13296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cassilly, C.D.; Reynolds, T.B. Ps, it’s complicated: The roles of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in the pathogenesis of Candida albicans and other microbial pathogens. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wolf, J.M.; Espadas, J.; Luquegarcia, J.; Reynolds, T.; Casadevall, A. Lipid biosynthetic genes affect Candida albicans extracellular vesicle morphology, cargo, and immunostimulatory properties. Eukaryot. Cell 2015, 14, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, Y.L.; Montedonico, A.E.; Kauffman, S.; Dunlap, J.R.; Menn, F.M.; Reynolds, T.B. Phosphatidylserine synthase and phosphatidylserine decarboxylase are essential for cell wall integrity and virulence in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75, 1112–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cassilly, C.D.; Maddox, M.M.; Cherian, P.T.; Bowling, J.J.; Hamann, M.T.; Lee, R.E.; Reynolds, T.B. Sb-224289 antagonizes the antifungal mechanism of the marine depsipeptide papuamide A. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tao, L.; Gao, N.S.; Yu, J.H. The choC gene encoding a putative phospholipid methyltransferase is essential for growth and development in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr. Genet. 2010, 56, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zheng, C.; Houweling, M. Phosphatidylcholine and cell death. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1585, 87–96. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagiec, M.M.; Nagiec, E.E.; Baltisberger, J.A.; Wells, G.B.; Lester, R.L.; Dickson, R.C. Sphingolipid synthesis as a target for antifungal drugs. Complementation of the inositol phosphorylceramide synthase defect in a mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the AUR1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 9809–9817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mandala, S.M.; Thornton, R.A.; Milligan, J.; Rosenbach, M.; Garciacalvo, M.; Bull, H.G.; Harris, G.; Abruzzo, G.K.; Flattery, A.M.; Gill, C.J. Rustmicin, a potent antifungal agent, inhibits sphingolipid synthesis at inositol phosphoceramide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 14942–14949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mandala, S.M.; Thornton, R.A.; Rosenbach, M.; Milligan, J.; Garciacalvo, M.; Bull, H.G.; Kurtz, M.B. Khafrefungin, a novel inhibitor of sphingolipid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32709–32714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chayakulkeeree, M.; Rude, T.H.; Toffaletti, D.L.; Perfect, J.R. Fatty acid synthesis is essential for survival of Cryptococcus neoformans and a potential fungicidal target. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3537–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zweytick, D.; Leitner, E.; Kohlwein, S.D.; Yu, C.; Rothblatt, J.; Daum, G. Contribution of Are1p and Are2p to steryl ester synthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS J. 2000, 267, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Athenstaedt, K.; Daum, G. The life cycle of neutral lipids: Synthesis, storage and degradation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 1355–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chen, Y.; Cen, K.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Shang, Y.; Wang, C. Nitrogen-starvation triggers cellular accumulation of triacylglycerol in Metarhizium robertsii. Fungal Biol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cecil, A.; Ohlsen, K.; Menzel, T.; François, P.; Schrenzel, J.; Fischer, A.; Dörries, K.; Selle, M.; Lalk, M.; Hantzschmann, J. Modelling antibiotic and cytotoxic isoquinoline effects in Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and mammalian cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 305, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cecil, A.; Rikanović, C.; Ohlsen, K.; Liang, C.; Bernhardt, J.; Oelschlaeger, T.A.; Gulder, T.; Bringmann, G.; Holzgrabe, U.; Unger, M. Modeling antibiotic and cytotoxic effects of the dimeric isoquinoline iq-143 on metabolism and its regulation in Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and human cells. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shityakov, S.; Dandekar, T.; Förster, C. Gene expression profiles and protein-protein interaction network analysis in AIDS patients with HIV-associated encephalitis and dementia. HIV 2015, 7, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Schrettl, M.; Beckmann, N.; Varga, J.; Heinekamp, T.; Jacobsen, I.D.; Jöchl, C.; Moussa, T.A.; Wang, S.; Gsaller, F.; Blatzer, M. HAPX-mediated adaption to iron starvation is crucial for virulence of Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1001124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Willger, S.D.; Puttikamonkul, S.; Kim, K.H.; Burritt, J.B.; Grahl, N.; Metzler, L.J.; Barbuch, R.; Bard, M.; Lawrence, C.B.; Cramer, R.A. A sterol-regulatory element binding protein is required for cell polarity, hypoxia adaptation, azole drug resistance, and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Andrew, M.D.; Fedorova, N.D.; Jonathan, C.; Yan, Y.; Stanley, K.; Dan, C.; Omar, L.; Timothy, C.; Gustavo, G.; Darius, A.J. Sub-telomere directed gene expression during initiation of invasive aspergillosis. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000154. [Google Scholar]
  51. De Gouvêa, P.F.; Soriani, F.M.; Malavazi, I.; Savoldi, M.; Goldman, M.H.; Loss, O.; Bignell, E.; Da, S.F.M.; Goldman, G.H. Functional characterization of the Aspergillus fumigatus PHO80 homologue. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2008, 45, 1135–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Martin, K.; Mugdha, S.; Gupta, S.K.; Liang, C.; Jasmin, B.; Anna-Maria, D.; Zohar, M.; Hubertus, H.; Nir, O.; Sven, K. Systematic identification of anti-fungal drug targets by a metabolic network approach. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2016, 3, 22. [Google Scholar]
  53. Boyce, K.; Kretschmer, M.; Kronstad, J. The vtc4 gene influences polyphosphate storage, morphogenesis, and virulence in the maize pathogen Ustilago maydis. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ikeh, M.A.C.; Kastora, S.L.; Day, A.M.; Herrero-De-Dios, C.M.; Tarrant, E.; Waldron, K.J.; Banks, A.P.; Bain, J.M.; Lydall, D.; Veal, E.A. PHO4 mediates phosphate acquisition in Candida albicans and is vital for stress resistance and metal homeostasis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2016, 27, 2784–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Cen, K.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, C. Diverse effect of phosphatidylcholine biosynthetic genes on phospholipid homeostasis, cell autophagy and fungal developments in Metarhizium robertsii. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Long, N.N.; Trofa, D.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Fatty acid synthase impacts the pathobiology of Candida parapsilosis in vitro and during mammalian infection. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8421. [Google Scholar]
  57. Selvaraju, K.; Rajakumar, S.; Nachiappan, V. Identification of a phospholipase B encoded by the lpl1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2014, 1841, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 04 00050 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative structure of (a) fatty acids, (b) phospholipids, (c) sphingolipids, (d) glycerolipids, and (e) sterol lipids. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [4].
Figure 1. Representative structure of (a) fatty acids, (b) phospholipids, (c) sphingolipids, (d) glycerolipids, and (e) sterol lipids. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [4].
Jof 04 00050 g001
Jof 04 00050 g002 550
Figure 2. Antifungal interference with ergosterol biosynthesis. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [24]. HMG-CoA, β-Hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA.
Figure 2. Antifungal interference with ergosterol biosynthesis. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [24]. HMG-CoA, β-Hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA.
Jof 04 00050 g002
Jof 04 00050 g003 550
Figure 3. Metabolic network of phospholipids in S. cerevisiae. G-3-P, Glycerol-3-phosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; PA, Phosphatidic acid; Lyso-PA, Lyso- Phosphatidic acid; Acyl-DHAP, Acyl-Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; CDP-DAG, Cytidine diphosphate-diacylglycerol; PI, Phosphatidyl inositol; Ins, Inositol; PGP, Phosphatidylglycerol phosphate; PG, Phosphatidylglycerol; CL, Cardiolipin; PS, Phosphatidylserine; PE, Phosphatidylethanolamine; PME, Phosphatidyl monomethylaminoethanol; PDE, Phosphatidyl dimethylaminoethanol; PC, Phosphatidylcholine; DAG, Diacylglycerol; Etn, Ethanolamine; P-Etn, Phospho-ethanolamine; CDP-Etn, Cytidine diphosphate-ethanolamine; Cho, Choline; P-Cho, Phospho-choline; CDP-Cho, Cytidine diphosphate-choline.
Figure 3. Metabolic network of phospholipids in S. cerevisiae. G-3-P, Glycerol-3-phosphate; DHAP, Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; PA, Phosphatidic acid; Lyso-PA, Lyso- Phosphatidic acid; Acyl-DHAP, Acyl-Dihydroxyacetone phosphate; CDP-DAG, Cytidine diphosphate-diacylglycerol; PI, Phosphatidyl inositol; Ins, Inositol; PGP, Phosphatidylglycerol phosphate; PG, Phosphatidylglycerol; CL, Cardiolipin; PS, Phosphatidylserine; PE, Phosphatidylethanolamine; PME, Phosphatidyl monomethylaminoethanol; PDE, Phosphatidyl dimethylaminoethanol; PC, Phosphatidylcholine; DAG, Diacylglycerol; Etn, Ethanolamine; P-Etn, Phospho-ethanolamine; CDP-Etn, Cytidine diphosphate-ethanolamine; Cho, Choline; P-Cho, Phospho-choline; CDP-Cho, Cytidine diphosphate-choline.
Jof 04 00050 g003
Jof 04 00050 g004 550
Figure 4. De novo synthesis of sphingolipids in S. cerevisiae. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [38]. IPC, inositolphosphatyl-ceramide; MIPC, mannose inositol-P-ceramide; M(IP)2C, mannose-(inositol-P)2-ceramide.
Figure 4. De novo synthesis of sphingolipids in S. cerevisiae. This figure is adapted and modified from Ref. [38]. IPC, inositolphosphatyl-ceramide; MIPC, mannose inositol-P-ceramide; M(IP)2C, mannose-(inositol-P)2-ceramide.
Jof 04 00050 g004
Table
Table 1. Phospholipid composition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Table 1. Phospholipid composition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Cell FractionMol % of Total Phospholipids
PCPEPIPSCLPAOthers
Homogenate51.025.011.45.13.71.12.7
Plasma membrane11.324.627.232.2nd3.31.4
Endoplasmic reticulum38.918.622.46.40.36.110.0
Mitochondria33.422.720.63.37.21.710.1
Peroxisomes39.817.422.02.52.76.110.5
This table is adapted and modified from Ref. [9]. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phoaphatidylserine; CL, cardiolipin; PA, phosphatidic acid; nd, not discovered.
Table
Table 2. Enzymes catalyzing phospholipids metabolism in S. cerevisiae.
Table 2. Enzymes catalyzing phospholipids metabolism in S. cerevisiae.
NumberEnzymeAbbreviation
1G-3-P acyltransferaseSCT1
2G-3-P acyltransferaseGPT2
31-acyl-DHAP reductaseAYR1
4Lyso-phospholipid acyltransferaseSLC1/ALE1
5CDP-DAG synthaseCDS1
6PI synthasePIS1
7PGP synthasePGS1
8PGP phosphataseGEP4
9CL synthaseCRD1
10PS synthaseCHO1
11PS decarboxylase 1/2PSD1/PSD 2
12PE methylaseCHO2
13Phospholipids methylaseOPI3
14PA phosphatasePAH1
15DAG kinaseDGK1
16Etn kinaseEKI1
17P-Etn cytidylyltransferaseECT1
18Etn phosphotransferaseEPT1
19Choline kinaseCKI1
20P-cho cytidylyltransferasePCT1
21Choline phosphotransferaseCPT1
22Phospholipase CPLC
23Phospholipase DSPO14
Table
Table 3. Antifungal target proteins related to lipid metabolism.
Table 3. Antifungal target proteins related to lipid metabolism.
GeneAnnotationFungi Tested *Reference
AFUA_4G13680Phosphatidylserine synthaseC. albicans[33]
AFUA_2G15970Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferaseS. cersvisiae et al.[55]
AFUA_1G09050Methylene-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthaseA. nidulans[35]
AFUA_3G04210Fatty acid synthase α subunit FasAC. neoformans[41]
AFUA_3G04220Fatty acid synthase β subunit FasBC. neoformans
C. parapsilosis		[41,56]
AFUA_5G01960Phosphate transporter Pho88A. nidulans
A. fumigatus		[51]
AFUA_3G12320Lipase/Serine esteraseS. cerevisiae[57]
AFUA_2G09040Vacuolar transporter chaperone (Vtc4)Ustilago maydis
Candida		[53,54]
* “Fungi tested” means that fungi listed here are already well described in literature and the researchers have published evidence supporting them as promising drug targets.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, J.; Hu, C.; Yu, J.-H. Lipid Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020050

AMA Style

Pan J, Hu C, Yu J-H. Lipid Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(2):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Jiao, Cuiting Hu, and Jae-Hyuk Yu. 2018. "Lipid Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 2: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020050

APA Style

Pan, J., Hu, C., & Yu, J. -H. (2018). Lipid Biosynthesis as an Antifungal Target. Journal of Fungi, 4(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop