Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of a New Cryogel Matrix for Covalent Immobilization of Catalase
Next Article in Special Issue
Design and Development of Fluorinated and Biocide-Free Sol–Gel Based Hybrid Functional Coatings for Anti-Biofouling/Foul-Release Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Gel Properties and Formation Mechanism of Camellia Oil Body-Based Oleogel Improved by Camellia Saponin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrogel-Based Adsorbent Material for the Effective Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Gels
Volume 8
Issue 8
10.3390/gels8080500
gels-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and CO2 Capture of Porous Hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine)s

by
Hojung Choi
1,†,
Sanghwa Lee
1,†,
SeongUk Jeong
1,
Yeon Ki Hong
2 and
Sang Youl Kim
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea
2
School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju-si 27469, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Gels 2022, 8(8), 500; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080500
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 9 August 2022 / Published: 11 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functionalized Gels for Environmental Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We successfully synthesized new macroporous hydrogel particles consisting of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s (HPAMAM) using the Oil-in-Water-in-Oil (O/W/O) suspension polymerization method at both the 50 mL flask scale and the 5 L reactor scale. The pore sizes and particle sizes were easily tuned by controlling the agitation speeds during the polymerization reaction. Since O/W/O suspension polymerization gives porous architecture to the microparticles, synthesized hydrogel particles having abundant amine groups inside polymers exhibited a high CO2 absorption capacity (104 mg/g) and a fast absorption rate in a packed-column test.

1. Introduction

A major anthropogenic greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, CO2 gas has been emitted in large quantities, mainly due to the burning of fossil fuels and other chemical processes [1,2]. Despite the global economic slowdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the atmospheric concentration of CO2 increased to 421 ppm in May 2022, from 405 ppm in 2017 and 340 ppm in the 1980s [3,4], and the estimated amount of annual CO2 capture necessary to maintain the current level of atmospheric CO2 concentrations has reached 3.7 gigatonnes/year [5]. However, fossil fuels are the major source of energy for human activities [6,7], and this trend is expected to continue over the coming decades [8]. Therefore, capture and storage of CO2 gas from power plants is an urgent and important issue with respect to reducing CO2 emissions.
The current CO2 capture technology from flue gases involves the passage of streams of CO2-containing flue gases through an aqueous amine solution, for example, monoethanolamine (MEA), in the absorber column. The amine solution is then regenerated by heating it in a stripping tower to liberate the CO2. This ‘wet-scrubbing’ method with an alkanolamine solution has been employed industrially since the 1980s and is suitable for large-scale removal of CO2 [8]. However, the regeneration of the total solution requires considerable energy consumption, and the amine concentration of the solution is limited due to viscosity and foaming [9]. Furthermore, careful control of the alkanolamine solution is necessary to avoid corrosion and oxidative degradation [2,10].
In efforts to overcome these problems, recently many materials have been developed as dry type solid CO2 adsorbents. In the early stage of research, porous inorganic materials drew interest as solid type adsorbents for their high surface area [11,12,13]. However, industrial flue gases contain a considerable amount of water vapor [14], and these types of adsorbents are vulnerable to moisture, resulting in diminution of their sorption capacity and durability [15,16]. To address these drawbacks, amine-containing CO2 adsorbents that tolerate moisture have been developed, including amine-modified mesoporous silica [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) [26,27,28,29,30,31], and amine-containing polymeric adsorbents [32,33,34,35,36]. However, implementing amines in solid supports disrupts the pore structure and reduces the surface area [25,37,38]. Furthermore, nonuniform dispersion of the amine and the complicated synthetic process of amine-implemented solid CO2 adsorbents are hurdles toward practical applications.
To exploit the strengths of wet-scrubbing and a dry type adsorbent, we designed a hydrogel absorbent that works in an aqueous phase. A hydrogel is introduced because hydrogels are widely used as adsorbents for various substances such as heavy metal ions, dyes, and carbon dioxide due to their high adsorption performance and ease of use in an aqueous solution [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Because amines are verified carbon dioxide absorbers in wet-scrubbing processes by forming carbamate and ammonium bicarbonate with CO2, we adopted poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) as our key functional material. PAMAM has a high content of N-heteroatom groups. Abundant secondary and hindered amine groups of PAMAM are expected to provide high CO2 sorption capacity [10,47]. Previously, we reported a facile one-step synthesis and application of micro-sized hyperbranched PAMAM (HPAMAM) particles [48]. Compared with PAMAM dendrimers, HPAMAM particles offer advantages of simplicity in the synthetic process and ease of use as packed columns without an ultrafiltration step for separation. In this work, we synthesize porous HPAMAM particles and investigate the CO2 sorption ability of the porous HPAMAM hydrogel microbeads in packed columns (Scheme 1). The amine groups of HPAMAM particles in the packed column resemble the environment of amines in conventional wet scrubbing. Emulsion templating including double emulsions is generally used to produce porous materials. We adopted the Oil-in-Water-in-Oil (O/W/O) suspension polymerization method to provide a porous feature to HPAMAM particles that resembles the structural pores of solid type adsorbents [49,50,51,52]. The macropores inside of the hydrogel particles facilitate mass transfer and diffusion and thereby accelerate the sorption rate.

2. Results and Discussion

The preparation of porous HPAMAM particles was carried out via the O/W/O suspension polymerization method. We prepared three solutions: (1) an inner phase organic solution (O1, solution 1) used to create interior pores; (2) an aqueous solution (W, solution 2) in which a polymerization reaction actually takes place; and (3) an outer phase organic solution (O2, solution 3) for developing spherical particles.
A2 (N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide, MBA) and B4 (ethylenediamine, EDA) monomers and surfactant (poly(vinylalcohol), PVA) were mixed together in aqueous solution W until complete dissolution of the solids to induce aza-michael addition between amine and acrylamide. The O1 solution, containing a cosurfactant (Span 60®) and toluene, was added to aqueous solution W with vigorous agitation to make an O/W suspension. The O/W mixture was then suspended to the O2 solution. Since the polymerization of hydrophilic monomers occurs in the aqueous phase, the gelated polymer forms a spherical shape with the inner dispersion of organic solutions. After the polymerization, during the workup, the inner organic phase was removed from the particles, leaving macropores. Samples of porous HPAMAM particles are designated as P-MxAyTz, where x, y and z denote the molar feed ratio of MBA to EDA, the agitation speed (rpm) of the O/W suspension, and the volume ratio of solution 1 to solution 2, respectively (Scheme 1).
Three kinds of porous HPAMAM particles, P-M1.5A1400T0.6, P-M1.5A3000T0.6, and P-M1.5A6000T0.6, were synthesized via O/W/O suspension polymerization with different agitation speeds to verify that the pore size can be controlled by the agitation speed of the O/W phase. To verify the chemical structures of the product, we carried out ATR-FTIR analysis for a representative sample of P-M1.5A1400T0.6 (Figure 1). ATR-FTIR spectra of MBA, EDA, and PAMAM polymers showed the peaks of N-H stretching (3000~3350 cm−1), C=O stretching (1650 cm−1), and CONH stretching (1520 cm−1) in the PAMAM product, suggesting the successful synthesis of poly(amidoamine). The C=CH2 stretching peak (3020 cm−1) of MBA disappeared in the PAMAM product. The 3080 cm−1 peak is an overtone of 1540 cm−1 (N-H bending), which commonly appears in amide compounds. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) was performed to obtain additional information on the monomer ratio (Figure S1). The morphology of the synthesized porous HPAMAM particles was investigated with an optical microscope (OM) and a scanning electron microscope (SEM), as shown in Figure 2. Particle sizes obtained with a slower agitation speed (1000 rpm) were smaller than the particle sizes obtained at a faster agitation speed (1400 rpm) (Figure S2). Since the size of the pores was in the range of the micrometer scale, we analyzed the pore sizes through SEM images rather than with porosimetry such as BET, which is suitable for micro or mesopores. The average pore size changed from 2.9 μm to 2.3 μm to 1.3 μm with each agitation speed of 1400 rpm, 3000 rpm, and 6000 rpm, respectively (Figure 2c and Figure S3). As expected, the pore size decreased with the increase of the O/W phase agitation speed. However, the size of the particles did not change regardless of the O/W phase agitation speed (50–300 μm). The proposed synthetic route for porous HPAMAM hydrogel particles via O/W/O suspension polymerization is an eco-friendly process. It does not produce any byproducts and does not require catalysts or pore-generating reagents (porogens). Scale-up synthesis of the porous HPAMAM hydrogel particles was attempted with O/W/O suspension polymerization. The 2 L scale O/W/O suspension polymerization reaction of MBA and EDA monomers proceeded successfully and a product (P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L) with 50–300 μm particle diameters was obtained (Figure 3). The porous HPAMAM hydrogel particles exhibited no differences compared to the particles obtained with the smaller scale reaction. The synthesized porous PAMAM hydrogel particles contain a large amount of amine functional groups that are known to interact with carbon dioxide to form carbamates (Figure S4). On the basis of the feasibility of large-scale production through an eco-friendly process and the high reactivity of the amines in synthesized polymers to carbon dioxide [10,47,53,54], the porous HPAMAM hydrogel particles are suitable CO2 absorbing materials for flue gas.
To measure the CO2 absorption capacity of the hydrogel particles, water-soaked porous HPAMAM particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L) packed in a 60 cm column were used with a continuous flow of CO2. A schematic illustration of the column and a photograph of the experimental setup are shown in Figure 4. We used a column with a pocket where water can be circulated to control the temperature of the column at 50 °C. For the measurement, 45 g of porous PAMAM particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L) was used at various CO2 concentrations (6, 9, 12, and 15 wt%) with a gas flow rate of 150 mL/min (Figure 5). The concentration of outlet CO2 gas was measured by gas chromatography at 25 °C. The porous HPAMAM hydrogel particles exhibited 2.374 mol/kg of CO2 sorption (104 mg/g) within 60 min for saturation at 15 wt% CO2 concentration while the sorption value was 2.150 mol/kg and 100 min for saturation at 9 wt% CO2. These values are comparable to the reported values of amine-modified mesoporous silica (1.36–2.59 mol/kg) [35,55,56].

3. Conclusions

We synthesized a new type of CO2 absorbing porous hydrogel particle consisting of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)s by Oil-in-Water-in-Oil (O/W/O) suspension polymerization of N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) and ethylenediamine (EDA) monomers. By introducing the double emulsion method to the conventional inverse suspension polymerization, synthesis of macroporous hydrogel particles was achieved successfully. The particle sizes and the size of macropores were controlled by simply changing the agitation speed of Oil-in-Water-in-Oil (O/W/O) suspension polymerization, demonstrating the high applicability of the synthetic method in a large scale. The synthesized porous PAMAM hydrogel particles contain many amine functional groups that are known to interact with carbon dioxide. A CO2 sorption test revealed the CO2 absorption capacity of the porous hydrogel particles was 104.4 mg/g, which is comparable to the values of high performance dry-state adsorbents. Easy scale-up of the O/W/O suspension polymerization of MBA and EDA without any byproducts supports the practical usability of porous hydrogel particles for CO2 capture from flue gas.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Information

Ethylenediamine (EDA), N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA), poly(vinylalcohol) (PVA) (Mw = 89,000–98,000 g/mol), and Span 60® were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Boston, MA, USA). Methanol (MeOH), toluene, and cyclohexane were purchased from Junsei (Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan). All reagents were used as received without further purification. A 5L Chemglass ChemRxnHub (Vineland, NJ, USA) Process system was used in the scale up process. Images of the particles were obtained by Nikon ECLIPSE ME600 (Tokyo, Japan) optical microscopy (OM), FEI Nova230 (Hillsboro, OR, USA), and JEOL JSM IT800 (Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) scanning electron microscopy (SEM). EDS analysis was conducted by a Bruker Quantax ESPRIT (Billerica, MA, USA) attachment. CO2 was measured by DS6200 gas chromatography (DS Science Inc.; Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea).

4.2. Various Agitation Speeds of Aqueous Phase

Three solutions, solution 1 (Span60 (0.128 g, 5 wt%) in toluene (3 mL)), solution 2 (MBA (2.024 g), EDA (0.526 g), PVA (0.026 g, 1 wt%) in water (5.1 mL)), and solution 3 (Span60 (0.013 g, 0.5 wt%) in toluene (20.4 mL)) were prepared. Solution 3 was stirred vigorously at 60 °C. MBA, EDA, PVA, and water in solution 2 were mixed together until complete dissolution of the solids at 45 °C. After solution 1 was added to solution 2, it was agitated at 1400 rpm (stirring bar), 3000 rpm (homogenizer), and 6000 rpm (homogenizer) for one minute. After that, solution 2 was added to solution 3, and agitated at 1400 rpm at 60 °C. After 6 hr of polymerization, particles were filtered and washed with methanol and acetone, and dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 24 hr.

4.3. Scale up Process

Three solutions, solution 1 (Span60 (25 g, 0.5 wt%) in toluene (600 mL)), solution 2 (MBA (398.6 g), EDA (103.2 g), PVA (5 g, 1 wt%) in water (1 L)), and solution 3 (Span60 (1.5 g, 0.5 wt%) in toluene (2 L)) were prepared. Solution 3 was stirred vigorously at 60 °C. MBA, EDA, PVA, and water in solution 2 were mixed together until dissolution of the solids at 45 °C. After solution 1 was added to solution 2, it was agitated at 5000 rpm (homogenizer), for one minute. Solution 2 was then added to solution 3, and it was agitated at 1400 rpm at 60 °C. After 6 hr of polymerization, particles were filtered and washed with methanol and acetone, and dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 24 h.

4.4. CO2 Absorption Test

Water was poured to 45 g of each type of PAMAM particle (P1.5, P1.8, P2.0, and P1.5 porosity) in a beaker. After 90 min, wet PAMAM particles were placed in an acryl column (diameter: 7 cm, height 60 cm). Removing the moisture in column, N2 gas was flowed for 20 min. CO2 absorption was then carried out using 15 wt%, 12 wt%, 9 wt% and 6 wt% of CO2 (The rest of the gas was N2) at a flow rate of 150 mL/min at 50 °C. The concentration of CO2 in the outlet gas was measured by gas chromatography.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/gels8080500/s1, Figure S1: SEM and EDS analysis of P-M1.5A1400T0.6; Figure S2: SEM images of P-M1.5A3000, W/O agitation speed of 1400 rpm (a,b) and P-M1.5A3000, W/O agitation speed of 1000 rpm (c,d); Figure S3: Pore size distribution of various O1/W agitation speeds, 1400 rpm (a), 3000 rpm (b), 6000 rpm (c), and merged graph (d), based on SEM images of Figure 2; Figure S4: Reactions of amine and carbon dioxide [1,2,3,4].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and S.Y.K.; methodology, S.L.; software, S.L.; validation, S.L. and H.C.; formal analysis, S.L.; investigation, H.C.; resources, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C. and S.J.; writing—review and editing, Y.K.H. and S.Y.K.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, S.Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (NRF-2021R1A4A1052070) and by a Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korean government (MOTIE) (20191510301070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carapellucci, R.; Milazzo, A. Membrane systems for CO2 capture and their integration with gas turbine plants. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A J. Power Energy 2003, 217, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, H.; Xu, Z.; Fan, M.; Gupta, R.; Slimane, R.B.; Bland, A.E.; Wright, I. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ziemke, J.R.; Cooper, O.R. Tropospheric Ozone, in “State of the Climate in 2017”. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2018, 99, S56–S59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carbon Dioxide Now More than 50% Higher than Pre-Industrial Levels. Available online: https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/carbon-dioxide-now-more-than-50-higher-than-pre-industrial-levels (accessed on 25 June 2022).
  5. International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program (IEA-ETSAP) Technology Roadmap; International Energy Agency (IEA): Paris, France, 2013; Volume 59.
  6. Li, J.-R.; Ma, Y.; McCarthy, M.C.; Sculley, J.; Yu, J.; Jeong, H.-K.; Balbuena, P.B.; Zhou, H.-C. Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1791–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kenarsari, S.D.; Yang, D.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Russell, A.G.; Wei, Q.; Fan, M. Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 22739–22773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rochelle, G.T. Amine Scrubbing for CO2 Capture. Science 2009, 325, 1652–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Franchi, R.S.; Harlick, P.J.E.; Sayari, A. Applications of Pore-Expanded Mesoporous Silica. 2. Development of a High-Capacity, Water-Tolerant Adsorbent for CO2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 8007–8013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. D’Alessandro, D.M.; Smit, B.; Long, J.R. Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058–6082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pourhakkak, P.; Taghizadeh, M.; Taghizadeh, A.; Ghaedi, M. Adsorption: Fundamental Processes and Applications, 1st ed.; Ghaedi, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 33, pp. 71–210. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schumacher, C.; Gonzalez, J.; Pérez-Mendoza, M.; Wright, P.A.; Seaton, N.A. Design of Hybrid Organic/Inorganic Adsorbents Based on Periodic Mesoporous Silica. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 5586–5597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. González, A.; Plaza, M.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. Sustainable biomass-based carbon adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 230, 456–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aouini, I.; Ledoux, A.; Estel, L.; Mary, S. Étude du captage du CO2 dans des gaz de combustion d’un incinérateur de déchets à l’aide d’un pilote utilisant un solvant à base de MEA. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2014, 69, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Burtch, N.C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K.S. Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10575–10612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. DeCoste, J.B.; Peterson, G.W.; Schindler, B.J.; Killops, K.L.; Browe, M.A.; Mahle, J.J. The effect of water adsorption on the structure of the carboxylate containing metal-organic frameworks Cu-BTC, Mg-MOF-74, and UiO-66. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11922–11932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, L.; Yao, M.; Hu, X.; Hu, G.; Lu, J.; Luo, M.; Fan, M. Amine-modified ordered mesoporous silica: The effect of pore size on CO2 capture performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 324, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kishor, R.; Ghoshal, A.K. Amine-Modified Mesoporous Silica for CO2 Adsorption: The Role of Structural Parameters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 6078–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qian, Z.; Wei, L.; Mingyue, W.; Guansheng, Q. Application of amine-modified porous materials for CO2 adsorption in mine confined spaces. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 629, 127483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vilarrasa-Garcia, E.; Moya, E.O.; Cecilia, J.; Cavalcante, C.; Jiménez-Jiménez, J.; Azevedo, D.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E. CO2 adsorption on amine modified mesoporous silicas: Effect of the progressive disorder of the honeycomb arrangement. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 209, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anyanwu, J.-T.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.T. Amine-Grafted Silica Gels for CO2 Capture Including Direct Air Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 7072–7079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garip, M.; Gizli, N. Ionic liquid containing amine-based silica aerogels for CO2 capture by fixed bed adsorption. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 310, 113227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fayaz, M.; Sayari, A. Long-Term Effect of Steam Exposure on CO2 Capture Performance of Amine-Grafted Silica. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 43747–43754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ojeda, M.; Mazaj, M.; Garcia, S.; Xuan, J.; Maroto-Valer, M.; Logar, N.Z. Novel Amine-impregnated Mesostructured Silica Materials for CO2 Capture. Energy Procedia 2017, 114, 2252–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, X.; Zhuang, L.; Ma, B.; Chen, S.; He, H.; Yin, F. Silanol-rich platelet silica modified with branched amine for efficient CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 181, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Demessence, A.; D’Alessandro, D.M.; Foo, M.L.; Long, J.R. Strong CO2 Binding in a Water-Stable, Triazolate-Bridged Metal-Organic Framework Functionalized with Ethylenediamine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8784–8786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cui, X.; Chen, K.; Xing, H.; Yang, Q.; Krishna, R.; Bao, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; Dong, X.; Han, Y.; et al. Pore chemistry and size control in hybrid porous materials for acetylene capture from ethylene. Science 2016, 353, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Martínez, F.; Sanz, R.; Orcajo, G.; Briones, D.; Yángüez, V. Amino-impregnated MOF materials for CO2 capture at post-combustion conditions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 142, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, G.; Wei, G.; Liu, Z.; Oliver, S.R.J.; Fei, H. A Robust Sulfonate-Based Metal-Organic Framework with Permanent Porosity for Efficient CO2 Capture and Conversion. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 6276–6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ghalei, B.; Sakurai, K.; Kinoshita, Y.; Wakimoto, K.; Isfahani, A.P.; Song, Q.; Doitomi, K.; Furukawa, S.; Hirao, H.; Kusuda, H.; et al. Enhanced selectivity in mixed matrix membranes for CO2 capture through efficient dispersion of amine-functionalized MOF nanoparticles. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Molavi, H.; Eskandari, A.; Shojaei, A.; Mousavi, S.A. Enhancing CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity via post-synthetic modification of NH2-UiO-66(Zr). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 257, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Min, K.; Choi, W.; Kim, C.; Choi, M. Rational Design of the Polymeric Amines in Solid Adsorbents for Postcombustion Carbon Dioxide Capture. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23825–23833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Min, K.; Choi, W.; Kim, C.; Choi, M. Oxidation-stable amine-containing adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Park, S.; Kim, J.; Won, Y.-J.; Kim, C.; Choi, M.; Jung, W.; Lee, K.S.; Na, J.-G.; Cho, S.-H.; Lee, S.Y.; et al. Epoxide-Functionalized, Poly(ethylenimine)-Confined Silica/Polymer Module Affording Sustainable CO2 Capture in Rapid Thermal Swing Adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 13923–13931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Park, S.; Choi, K.; Yu, H.J.; Won, Y.-J.; Kim, C.; Choi, M.; Cho, S.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, J.S. Thermal Stability Enhanced Tetraethylenepentamine/Silica Adsorbents for High Performance CO2 Capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 4632–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Choi, W.; Park, J.; Kim, C.; Choi, M. Structural effects of amine polymers on stability and energy efficiency of adsorbents in post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sujan, A.R.; Pang, S.H.; Zhu, G.; Jones, C.W.; Lively, R.P. Direct CO2 Capture from Air using Poly(ethylenimine)-Loaded Polymer/Silica Fiber Sorbents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 5264–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, G.; Zhao, P.; Hao, L.; Xu, Y. Amine-modified SBA-15(P): A promising adsorbent for CO2 capture. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 24, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Verduzco-Navarro, I.P.; Mendizábal, E.; Mayorga, J.A.R.; Rentería-Urquiza, M.; Gonzalez-Alvarez, A.; Rios-Donato, N. Arsenate Removal from Aqueous Media Using Chitosan-Magnetite Hydrogel by Batch and Fixed-Bed Columns. Gels 2022, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, S.; Su, K.; Yang, H.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, Z.; Ang, S.; Zhang, K.; Wu, P. Novel Natural Glycyrrhetinic Acid-Derived Super Metal Gel and Its Highly Selective Dyes Removal. Gels 2022, 8, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choi, H.; Kim, T.; Kim, S.Y. Poly (Amidehydrazide) Hydrogel Particles for Removal of Cu2+ and Cd2+ Ions from Water. Gels 2021, 7, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, H.; Eom, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.Y. Copper Ions Removal from Water using A2B3 Type Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine) Hydrogel Particles. Molecules 2019, 24, 3866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xu, X.; Heath, C.; Pejcic, B.; Wood, C.D. CO2 capture by amine infused hydrogels (AIHs). J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 4829–4838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, X.; Pejcic, B.; Heath, C.; Wood, C.D. Carbon capture with polyethylenimine hydrogel beads (PEI HBs). J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 21468–21474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kang, D.W.; Lee, W.; Ahn, Y.-H. Superabsorbent polymer for improved CO2 hydrate formation under a quiescent system. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 61, 102005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, M.-T.; Song, F.-P.; Zhang, G.-D.; Li, J.-Z.; Wang, F. Polymeric superabsorbent hydrogel-based kinetic promotion for gas hydrate formation. Fuel 2021, 288, 119676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Taniguchi, I.; Kinugasa, K.; Toyoda, M.; Minezaki, K. Effect of amine structure on CO2 capture by polymeric membranes. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, S.; Eom, Y.; Park, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.Y. Micro-hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Polyamidoamine for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, A. Fabrication of magnetic porous microspheres via (O1/W)/O2 double emulsion for fast removal of Cu2+ and Pb2+. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 67, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, T.; Sanguramath, R.A.; Israel, S.; Silverstein, M.S. Emulsion Templating: Porous Polymers and Beyond. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 5445–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blin, J.-L.; Jacoby, J.; Kim, S.; Stébé, M.-J.; Canilho, N.; Pasc, A. A meso-macro compartmentalized bioreactor obtained through silicalization of “green” double emulsions: W/O/W and W/SLNs/W. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11871–11874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jeong, W.-C.; Choi, M.; Lim, C.H.; Yang, S.-M. Microfluidic synthesis of atto-liter scale double emulsions toward ultrafine hollow silica spheres with hierarchical pore networks. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 5262–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Henao, W.; Jaramillo, L.Y.; López, D.; Romero-Sáez, M.; Buitrago-Sierra, W.A.H. Insights into the CO2 capture over amine-functionalized mesoporous silica adsorbents derived from rice husk ash. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Varghese, A.M.; Karanikolos, G.N. CO2 capture adsorbents functionalized by amine-bearing polymers: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2020, 96, 103005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wilfong, W.C.; Kail, B.W.; Jones, C.W.; Pacheco, C.; Gray, M.L. Spectroscopic Investigation of the Mechanisms Responsible for the Superior Stability of Hybrid Class 1/Class 2 CO2 Sorbents: A New Class 4 Category. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12780–12791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kishor, R.; Ghoshal, A.K. N1-(3-Trimethoxysilylpropyl)diethylenetriamine grafted KIT-6 for CO2/N2 selective separation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 898–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gels 08 00500 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of synthesis and carbon dioxide capture of porous HPAMAM.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of synthesis and carbon dioxide capture of porous HPAMAM.
Gels 08 00500 sch001
Gels 08 00500 g001 550
Figure 1. ATR-FTIR spectra of methylenebiscrylamide (a), ethylenediamine (b), and poly(amidoamine) particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6) (c).
Figure 1. ATR-FTIR spectra of methylenebiscrylamide (a), ethylenediamine (b), and poly(amidoamine) particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6) (c).
Gels 08 00500 g001
Gels 08 00500 g002 550
Figure 2. Optical images (a), SEM image (b), and cross-sectional SEM image of (1-a, 1-b and 1-c) P-M1.5A1400T0.6, (2-a, 2-b and 2-c) P-M1.5A3000T0.6, and (3-a, 3-b and 3-c) P-M1.5A6000T0.6. Magnification is ×1000 (b) and ×5000 (c).
Figure 2. Optical images (a), SEM image (b), and cross-sectional SEM image of (1-a, 1-b and 1-c) P-M1.5A1400T0.6, (2-a, 2-b and 2-c) P-M1.5A3000T0.6, and (3-a, 3-b and 3-c) P-M1.5A6000T0.6. Magnification is ×1000 (b) and ×5000 (c).
Gels 08 00500 g002
Gels 08 00500 g003 550
Figure 3. Optical images of P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L (a) and cross-sectional SEM images of P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L (b) ×1000 and (c) ×5000.
Figure 3. Optical images of P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L (a) and cross-sectional SEM images of P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L (b) ×1000 and (c) ×5000.
Gels 08 00500 g003
Gels 08 00500 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the column and a photograph of the experimental setup.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the column and a photograph of the experimental setup.
Gels 08 00500 g004
Gels 08 00500 g005 550
Figure 5. CO2 sorption properties of porous PAMAM hydrogel particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L) with various CO2 concentrations of input gas.
Figure 5. CO2 sorption properties of porous PAMAM hydrogel particles (P-M1.5A1400T0.6-2L) with various CO2 concentrations of input gas.
Gels 08 00500 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.; Lee, S.; Jeong, S.; Hong, Y.K.; Kim, S.Y. Synthesis and CO2 Capture of Porous Hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine)s. Gels 2022, 8, 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080500

AMA Style

Choi H, Lee S, Jeong S, Hong YK, Kim SY. Synthesis and CO2 Capture of Porous Hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine)s. Gels. 2022; 8(8):500. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080500

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Hojung, Sanghwa Lee, SeongUk Jeong, Yeon Ki Hong, and Sang Youl Kim. 2022. "Synthesis and CO2 Capture of Porous Hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine)s" Gels 8, no. 8: 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080500

APA Style

Choi, H., Lee, S., Jeong, S., Hong, Y. K., & Kim, S. Y. (2022). Synthesis and CO2 Capture of Porous Hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine)s. Gels, 8(8), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8080500

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop