Dehydrated human-derived amnion–chorion membranes (ACM), known for their bioactive composition of growth factors and cytokines, have demonstrated potential as a bioactive scaffold in regenerative medicine; however, their clinical application in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) remains unexplored. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the
[...] Read more.
Dehydrated human-derived amnion–chorion membranes (ACM), known for their bioactive composition of growth factors and cytokines, have demonstrated potential as a bioactive scaffold in regenerative medicine; however, their clinical application in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) remains unexplored. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of REPs using ACM compared to collagen matrices (CM) in immature necrotic permanent teeth. Forty-one immature necrotic teeth from 38 patients (mean age: 14.68 ± 7.43 years) were treated with REPs using either ACM (
n = 21) or CM (
n = 20) scaffolds over a mean follow-up period of 23.23 months. Outcomes assessed included survival, success, root development measured by radiographic root area (RRA), and pulp sensibility. Independent t-tests compared outcomes between groups, while Cox regression and generalized linear models identified predictors of treatment outcomes. Overall survival and success rates were 87.8% and 82.9%, respectively. ACM-treated teeth achieved 90.5% survival and 85.7% success rates, while CM-treated teeth demonstrated 85.0% survival and 80.0% success rates, with no statistically significant differences between groups (
p > 0.05). Root development occurred in 85.4% of cases overall, with significant RRA increases of 13.89 ± 13.95% for ACM and 11.24 ± 11.21% for CM (
p < 0.05 within each group). Pulp sensibility recovery was observed in 51.2% of treated teeth overall, with 42.9% for ACM-treated teeth and 55.0% for CM-treated teeth (
p > 0.05). Notably, ACM-treated teeth demonstrated earlier sensibility recovery compared to those of CM-treated teeth. Age was identified as a significant negative predictor of root development outcomes (
p < 0.05). This clinical study demonstrates that both ACM and CM are clinically effective scaffolds for REPs, achieving high survival rates and promoting root development in immature necrotic teeth. While overall success rates were comparable, ACM showed faster sensibility recovery, suggesting potential biological advantages for enhanced tissue regeneration and earlier functional recovery.
Full article