Next Article in Journal
Modal Identification Techniques for Concrete Dams: A Comprehensive Review and Application
Previous Article in Journal
Promising Catalyst for Chlorosilane Dismutation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Connecting Soft and Hard: An Integrating Role of Systems Dynamics in Tsunami Modeling and Simulation

1
Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
2
Department of Electricity Techniques, Al-Samawah Technical Institute, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Kufa 66001, Iraq
3
Department of Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, Letná 1/9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia
4
FOMS, Department of Management & Entrepreneurship, University of Central Punjab Lahore, Lahore 54782, Pakistan
5
Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura City 35516, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 13 May 2024 / Revised: 4 July 2024 / Accepted: 9 July 2024 / Published: 11 July 2024

Abstract

:
Modeling and simulation have been used to study tsunamis for several decades. We created a review to identify the software and methods used in the last decade of tsunami research. The systematic review was based on the PRISMA methodology. We analyzed 105 articles and identified 27 unique software and 45 unique methods. The reviewed articles can be divided into the following basic categories: exploring historical tsunamis based on tsunami deposits, modeling tsunamis in 3D space, identifying tsunami impacts, exploring relevant variables for tsunamis, creating tsunami impact maps, and comparing simulation results with real data. Based on the outcomes of this review, this study suggests and exemplifies the possibilities of system dynamics as a unifying methodology that can integrate modeling and simulation of most identified phenomena. Hence, it contributes to the development of tsunami modeling as a scientific discipline that can offer new ideas and highlight limitations or a building block for further research in the field of natural disasters.

1. Introduction

Tsunamis are potentially extremely dangerous natural hazards that occur at low frequencies and are hard to predict. The “potentiality” depends on whether the tsunami hits an uninhabited area. In this case, nothing much happens regarding direct danger to people. However, it is an extreme risk if a populated area is affected. The main issue is that the events leading up to the tsunami do not clearly indicate its origin until it is generated [1]. With frequently scarce [2], it is necessary to develop a coherent framework that incorporates existing assumptions (i.e., the system’s general model) and various methods for hazard and risk analysis in order to assess the consequences of these events on various layers of society. The underlying objective of COST Action AGITHAR (Accelerating Global Science in Tsunami Hazard and Risk Analysis) is to develop further, standardize, and document such a framework, and this document is one of the Action’s outputs. Numerous sources can generate tsunamis in the form of long propagating waves. Tsunamis are a phenomenon primarily generated along convergent margins and caused by undersea earthquakes [3]. Tsunamis, once created, travel at high speeds and cover a large area of water. In case of a large tsunami, when waves reach coastal areas, they inundate land for several kilometers. As a result, casualties occur, as does damage to or destruction of infrastructure and built-up areas. More than 700 million people live in areas of extreme sea-level events, including tsunamis [4].
Research on tsunamis is multidisciplinary. Tsunamis can be studied from many different perspectives, namely the historical perspective, where tsunami deposits are examined, and the period when the tsunami arrived at the selected location is estimated, for example [5]. Furthermore, tsunamis are investigated from the perspective of their impact on the environment or on individual inhabited areas. Here, in particular, photo documentation is used before and after the wave impact, e.g., [6]. Another way of exploring tsunamis is their modeling, where tsunamis are usually presented as a three-dimensional environment, e.g., [7]. Models are usually developed to investigate impacts on a selected environment or on a populated area, e.g., [8], or on a hypothetical tsunami barrier, e.g., [9]. Another way of examining tsunamis is from a statistical perspective, either by searching for essential variables for the part of the tsunami being examined, e.g., [10], or from the statistical comparison of the impacts of a real tsunami with a modeled one, e.g., [11].
To date, no comprehensive systematic review has been published focusing on methods and software packages applied to explore the multidisciplinary phenomenon of the tsunami. An example of a systematic review thematically focused on tsunamis and similar events is provided by Palupi [12], who focuses on the psychological preparedness of coastal communities for a natural disaster. Fernandez et al. [13] focused on the mapping of scientific evidence on the mental health impacts of floods caused by extended periods of heavy rain in river catchments. The aim of this study is to contribute to both aforementioned topics through a deep analysis of existing modeling and simulation techniques and methods in the field of tsunami research and an outline of the possibility of further extension. The achievement of this aim is based on highlighting the importance of finding a tool that is not over-specialized and narrowly focused on particular aspects of tsunamis. While existing tools used in particular fields of study need to be applied to find answers to particular domain-related questions. the multidisciplinary nature of tsunamis requires applying a systemic approach at a higher level of complexity. The holistic view and complex structures with mutually interconnected parts represent the primary attributes of the systems approach. Hence, data or information acquired by particular tools, techniques, or modeling software can be used as inputs to more complex models, improving understanding and insights into the tsunami phenomenon. System dynamics is a commonly used methodology whose application can successfully lead to implementing the system perspective. The goal is to prove its applicability and potential added value in tsunami research.
This manuscript is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the applied methodology, which is based on a systematic review methodology, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Furthermore, technical details related to developing a system dynamics model are presented. The next two sections present achieved results. Section 3 provides a bibliographic analysis based on the specific keywords of identified articles. Furthermore, the results of the analysis of different types of software and methods for tsunami research are presented. Section 4 describes the developed system dynamics model, which demonstrates how various aspects can be integrated by one methodological approach. Particular modules are introduced. The final section concludes the paper with an outline of existing limitations and potential research pathways. Finally, the appendices capture an enumeration of the individual software applications, their methods, and reasons for their use. Moreover, an overview of the relationships between the software and the scientific disciplines and technical details associated with the developed model are provided.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Analysis

Collecting a data set that might be used for further analysis was the initial step in the study. To conduct a review, one can choose from two alternatives. The first option involves looking for relevant information resources in databases maintained by individual publishing houses (Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, etc.). The second approach uses databases that have selected journals indexed (Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, etc.). Both strategies have advantages and disadvantages. The former, for example, provides a data collection from a broader set of resources, but the latter works with publications whose quality is recognized by authority and a community. We found the latter more suitable for this study due to the absence of redundant records. Thus, a search in the Web of Science database for published papers was conducted.
Articles focused on tsunamis that used software for this activity represented the target of the search. The main criteria for searching articles were the language used, namely English; the year of publication, between 2010 and 2020; full-text availability (in order to conduct the content analysis); and the use of a software package for tsunami exploration. Initially, we intended to use the following search command for the intended systematic search:

2.1.1. Tsunami (Topic)

Refined by: Document Types: Articles, Publication Years: 2023 or 2022 or 2021 or 2020 or 2019 or 2018 or 2017 or 2016 or 2015 or 2014 or 2013 or 2012 or 2011 or 2010

However, articles containing the term “tsunami” broadly did not refer to tsunamis in the true sense of the word. An example of this phrase might be the tsunami of obesity. Therefore, we decided to narrow the search. The additional concept “water” filtered out articles that were not focused on the topic of this systematic search. Thus, we used the following command:

2.1.2. Tsunami (Topic) and Water (Topic)

Refined by: Document Types: Articles, Publication Years: 2023 or 2022 or 2021 or 2020 or 2019 or 2018 or 2017 or 2016 or 2015 or 2014 or 2013 or 2012 or 2011 or 2010

The next step was to search for full-text versions of the articles. This step does not follow the exact PRISMA methodology [14]; however, due to the search for software used in the tsunami field and also the lack of a list of software used in the tsunami field, we decided to skip the abstract screening step. Another reason for skipping this stage is that applied software applications are not always mentioned in abstracts.
Consequently, we searched for the word “software” in the full-text versions of the articles. We used Adobe Acrobat Reader DC [15] software for the search. We recorded the name of each software found and entered it into the list of used software. After we had searched all available articles, we started a new search using the aforementioned software, which included the software names found in the previous full-text search. In this step, we sorted the articles based on those in which some of the found software was used and those in which it was not. We then searched the articles in which tsunami software was used (if the article did not use one of the found software, it was omitted with Reason 1). We then excluded articles from this set of articles that did not have a specific method (if the article did not use one of the found methods, it was omitted with Reason 2). The whole process is shown in Figure 1. Eventually, we found 2015 articles, from which we included 1573 in the full-text search, and 105 articles passed the full-text screening.
As a part of the analytical section of the systematic review, we performed a bibliographic synthesis of keywords using the VOSviewer [16] tool. Seventeen articles were not included in this stage due to failure to include keywords in the articles. Linguistic word preparation was conducted in which, for instance, keyword run-up and run-up were unified under the single term run-up, or the keyword tsunami was excluded from the synthesis because of the focus of all the articles on this topic. Moreover, the exclusion was necessary as we tried to answer the following research questions: (1) What software tools and methods are used in tsunami research? and (2) How are tsunami research tools interconnected?

2.2. Model Development

System dynamics represents a specific and original methodological approach to modeling and simulating various types of systems. The core concepts of systems thinking, such as interconnectedness, feedback, adaptive capacity/resilience, self-organization, and emergence [17], are applied in system dynamics to help people make better decisions when confronted with complex, dynamic systems. The field provides a philosophy and tools to model and analyze dynamic systems.
Differential and difference equations are traditionally used to represent change in dynamic systems. However, system dynamics provides an intuitive modeling language, which is typical for all applications. This makes system dynamics an ideal tool for multidisciplinary work [18] as it enables the integration of subsystems that are distinct in their fundamental essence, i.e., soft disciplines such as economics or psychology can be connected with hard disciplines such as physics or geology. Exploration of complex phenomena such as tsunamis represents an appropriate example. Therefore, a complex model of various aspects of a tsunami has been developed to demonstrate the benefits and added value of incorporating this methodology into this field of study.
This study presents an original model presenting possibilities of tsunami analysis. The process of model development was based on the following procedure:
  • Identification of key topics in the scientific literature based on the literature review;
  • Classification of variables into distinct groups to develop particular model sectors or modules;
  • Identification of causal links among variables and feedbacks, i.e., causal loop diagrams;
  • Determination of time units (hours);
  • Transformation to a simulable model, i.e., development of stock and flow diagrams;
  • Performance of model validation tests [19]—structural validity (boundary adequacy, parameter verification, dimensional consistency) and behavioral validity (behavior pattern test, extreme condition test, sensitivity test).

3. Results

3.1. Application of Methods and SW Tools in the Current Research of Tsunamis

Figure 2 reveals that single methods or techniques are used mostly separately in research. One cluster is connected with the consequences of tsunamis in the form of numerical simulations that are primarily applied in the analysis of technical issues, such as construction vulnerability, and environmental issues, such as the influence of the tsunami wave on vegetation. The second cluster includes numerical modeling as well. This context deals with the origin of a tsunami and the wave itself. However, based on the discrepancy between the results from Table 1 presented below, where the interdependence of software tools usage reached a higher level, we decided to augment the input data with the name of the tool used. Thus, we added the names of the tools used to the keywords already provided by the authors of the articles. Then, we created a new outcome of the bibliographic analysis with the same settings as for the previous one. The results are presented in Figure 3. It is clear that most of the specific tools used in the tsunami field are interrelated. In fact, there is only one huge cluster and a few solitary outliers. It reveals that the applied methods are integrated mainly by the usage of OpenFoam, Matlab, and Calib.
Table 1 presents a synthesis of the included articles in the systematic review. The reason for each tool is provided. In Appendix A, Table A1, each tool is described; the descriptions are based on the official sources of each tool. The tools we found include OpenFOAM, CALIB, MATLAB, ArcGIS, COMCOT, Delft3D, GeoClaw, ANSYS, Agisoft, MB-System, QGIS, Tsunami-2d, VOLNA, Amira, DSAS, Fledermaus, FLOW3D, Gambit, Geosoft Oasis, Geowave, HAZUS, HydroSed2D, ICEM, OsiriX DICOM, R-studio, reflexW, SPAD. In Appendix A, Table A2 captures the transposed usage for each method, respectively, for all method usage in the articles we analyzed. The methods we found include the following: Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Constant Rate of Supply method (CRS), Digital Elevation Models (DEM), Finite Area Method (FAM), Fuzzy C-Means Clustering (FCM), Finite Element Mesh (FEM), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Finite Volume with Characteristic Flux (FVCF), Finite Volume Method (FVM), Gustafsson–Kreiss–Sundström stability theory (GKS), Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR), Linear Shallow Water Equations (LSWE), Maximum a posteriori values (MAP), MONTE CARLO (MC), Method for Splitting Tsunamis (MOST), Multidimensional Universal Limiter for Explicit Solution (MULES), Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations (NSWE), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operator (PIMPLE), Pressure Implicit with Splitting of Operators (PISO), Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA), Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations (SIMPLE), Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), Shallow Water Equations (SWE), and volume of fluid (VOF).
Based on Table 1 and Table A1 presented in Appendix A, two types of the most numerous tsunami-related models can be identified, namely, models that directly model tsunamis or parts of tsunamis and models aimed at identifying events in history based on tsunami deposit examination.
Table 2 shows the selected ratio of software use to the scientific disciplines (categories in which articles are classified in WoS) in which the articles were published (the whole table is in Appendix A, Table A3). As the Pareto rule of thumb suggests, 80.1% of software use belongs to 8 (30.8%) individual software. The situation is similar in the scientific fields, where 80.3% of the software used falls into 10 (34.5%) scientific fields related to tsunamis.
As mentioned earlier and shown in Figure 3, the different tsunami tools are interrelated. This interdependence is also evident in the scientific fields in which the papers were published. OpenFOAM (used in 32% of total cases) is the most multidisciplinary software application. For example, the MATLAB tool (used in 13,1% of total cases) was expected to be applied in various domains because of the multidisciplinary use of the tool in general. Surprisingly, the multidisciplinary application was not expected in the case of the CALIB tool (used in 8,6% of total cases). However, the results revealed the contrary.

3.2. SD Model of Tsunami-Related Phenomena

As it is clear from the literature analysis, various methods and tools are used in tsunami research. However, system dynamics tools, particular software applications, or methods are not used. The reason is apparent. Applied techniques, tools, and software packages focus on a specific domain or set of issues. They enable highly specialized modeling and simulation. The aim of this section is to demonstrate the suitability of the system dynamics methodology for modeling and simulation of various aspects of tsunamis and the mutual interconnection of soft and hard disciplines. Hence, a model of tsunami-oriented aspects has been developed. The model contains seven main subsystems (modules), which represent topics under study, namely the module describing the tsunami as a natural phenomenon (The formation of the Tsunami) and six other modules showing the spheres affected by the tsunami wave, namely the modules People, Buildings, Infrastructure, Finance, Defensive elements, and Environment. Apparently, modules can be extended by any aspect we need to investigate. This configuration is created only for demonstrative purposes.

3.2.1. The Formation of the Tsunami

Apparently, it all starts with the formation of a tsunami. Developed links are arbitrary to enable meaningful and performable analysis. Together with the module containing defensive elements, the tsunami formation represents the “hard” part of the model in which exact relations among variables based on physical laws and principles must be modeled. Other modules contain more or less ambiguous relationships due to their softness. Their settings can be determined not only based on established relationships but also by model creators based on their expertise, best practices, or rules. The module contains tsunami formation and propagation and is presented in the following Figure 4 and Figure 5.
This module is grounded in a set of converters, which mainly describe the behavior of the wave and their values. The module is based on equations presented in Appendix B. Water depth can be considered as the starting point of the module description. It is expressed using a graphical function. We have modeled a change in the depth of the water column, which is a function of time during the wave propagation and starts at the default value of 10,000 m and ends at 0 m. The change in the bottom terrain during the wave can be adjusted as needed based, for instance, on bathymetry data. Further variables associated with water depth are reckoned using the formulas from Appendix B.
The existence of shallow water waves must be verified, as tsunamis usually spread as this type of wave. This is verified by a simple condition that returns 0 if the shallow water wave does not exist and deactivates the module.
The wave height represents another important value associated with a wave at sea. Although unnecessary, the flow was chosen for this value instead of the converter, as this will allow a better connection with the wave amplitude value for which the conveyor must be used. The basic formula is used to determine the wave height at sea, which expresses that the more the sea depth decreases (the land approaches), the more the wave height increases. This value will be used to obtain information about the wave at the coast and the rise of the wave.
Another formula is based on maintaining wave energy flow and applies to so-called breaking and non-breaking waves. We also determine the value of the run-up factor and the maximum run-up height, which leads to the calculation of the Imamura-lida magnitude scale. This scale includes twelve different grades based on seismic intensity [123]. Other values that the maximum run-up height needs as input are wave height before shoaling and inclination of the coast. Wave shoaling is an effect that causes the surface waves that enter the shore to change their height. The height of these waves is needed for the model. The value was set to 8 m for this particular wave. The inclination of the coast is also a given value of 1.30176852   r a d i a n s .
The model uses another slope, namely the Inclination of the water surface. This is also set as a fixed value for the given wave as 0.00021025 radians. This value is then used to calculate the flow velocity of the run-up. We also need to calculate the value of inundation depth and the so-called Manning’s roughness coefficient. The Manning’s roughness coefficient is used in the Manning formula to calculate flow in open channels. In this case, the individual materials are entered in the fields, and a corresponding coefficient is added to them for easy material change. Now, for example, the material Earth Channel Weedy, a grassy earth channel with a coefficient of 0.030, is used [124]. This coefficient is also used for other calculations, such as inundation distance and flood distance. Its calculation uses only two values: coefficient and wave height at the shore, which is set at 1.928 m. Wave height at the shore is also used to calculate the loss in wave height per meter of inundation distance and the loss of wave height per meter of flooding distance. The last calculation is the wave run-up, which uses the above values and the so-called experimental constant, with a value of 0.5.
Five sectors further extend this basic module. These sectors deal with the emergence of the tsunami and can be linked to the primary model. Specific sectors are seismic activity, atmospheric disturbances, submarine landslides, meteorite impact, and volcanism.

3.2.2. People

This module illustrates the effect of a tsunami on the number of people in different categories, as presented in Figure 6. It is run entirely in units of People. Nine levels are included. In the first Population in the state reservoir, at time zero, the number of all people in the area affected by the tsunami is zero. In fact, except for the Population in the state variable, all other reservoirs are set to zero during the simulation initiation. This module is activated once the module The formation of the Tsunami is activated. The outflows separate the population into two other reservoirs, namely the affected population and the unaffected population, in both of these reservoirs at time zero because when the tsunami has not yet arrived, there is no need to distinguish between these two categories. People are further divided into those who are injured, dead, or uninjured into the Injured people, Dead people, and Unharmed people reservoirs. Rescuers is another reservoir where we have a number of rescuers in the area. Rescuers are then also divided into uninjured, wounded, and dead through model outflows. The last two reservoirs concern paramedics. The first is Paramedics in the state, where we have the number of all medics available, and the second is Paramedics in the area, where we have the number of all medics in a given location affected by the wave.

3.2.3. Buildings

This module, with the structure presented in Figure 7, demonstrates how the tsunami damaged or completely destroyed buildings in the area, as well as how reparation is funded from the Finance module later on. This module is influenced by The formation of the Tsunami module as well as the Finance module and is entirely in units of Buildings. The module is constructed based on the works of Leone at al. [125] and Rossetto at al. [126].
There are four reservoirs in this module, namely Buildings, Damaged buildings, Repaired buildings, and Destructed buildings. The Buildings repository contains a number of different types of buildings that are located in a given area. Buildings flow into the Damaged buildings storehouse, which are damaged by the tsunami and are classified according to the type of damage. Buildings that were completely destroyed by the tsunami wave flow into the Destructed buildings reservoir. After a while, the buildings will start to be repaired, and from the Damaged buildings reservoir, the buildings will start to flow into the Repaired buildings reservoir according to the volume of funds flowing from the last reservoir in this model, namely Finances divided into areas. This stock comes from the Finance module.
In three reservoirs, Buildings, Damaged buildings, and Repaired buildings, we have used arrays, namely “Types of buildings”, where the buildings are divided according to their durability. In the Damaged buildings and Repaired buildings reservoirs, another array is used, namely “Damage”, where we have types of building damage (initial values are in oval brackets, array Damage has zero initial values):
  • Array Types of building
  • Wood and metal plates (180);
  • Brick building (550);
  • Larger reinforced brick buildings (90);
  • Buildings with unreinforced concrete structures (63);
  • Buildings with reinforced concrete structures (27).
  • Array Damage
  • Slight damage to the roof and furniture;
  • Medium damage to walls and windows;
  • Construction damage;
  • Extreme construction damage.

3.2.4. Infrastructure

Based on the work of Ghobarah and Saatcioglu [127] and Valencia et al. [128], this module represents the damage of tsunamis to traffic communications (see Figure 8). Then, the wave damage to water pipes and poles with power cables is modeled here. The module also shows how communications and cable poles are repaired after the wave leaves with units of kilometers or meters. This module is influenced by the module The formation of the Tsunami and the Finance module.
There are three reservoirs in these modules: communications (Roads, Railways), water pipes (plastic, copper, metal), and power cables. Regarding communications, there are three repositories, namely Communications, Destroyed communications, and Repaired communications with units of kilometers. While initial values of Roads and Railways are set to 500 and 350, respectively, Destroyed communications and Repaired communications are set to 0 as the initial condition before the tsunami’s arrival. Similar to communications, water pipes consist of water pipes and destroyed water pipes with an array applied to different types of pipes, namely plastic, copper, and metal. Initial values are set to 10,000, 20,000, and 15,000, respectively. Destroyed water pipes have the initial value set to 0. Power cables contain three stocks: Power cables, Destroyed power cables, and New poles and cables. A two-dimensional array is used here: Pole material and height. Materials considered are wood, concrete, and metal. Height is divided into groups lower than 5 m, from 5 to 10 m, and higher than 10 m. With respect to arrays, initial values are [30,000, 25,000, 15,000; 200,000, 15,000, 3000; 120,000, 30,000, 20,000]. Initial values of Destroyed power cables and New power cables are set to 0 again.

3.2.5. Finance

In this module, selected financial issues are modeled (see Figure 9). It demonstrates the amount of pledged financial resources and investments into the impacted area. Moreover, distribution to various areas is also included. The work of Heger and Neumayer [129] and Kweifio-Okai [130] is used to build particular model elements and relationships. There are three main modules interacting with Finance, namely Building, Environment, and People.
This module has four reservoirs: Financial support, Finances of the affected state, Finance for damages, and Finance divided into areas. The first reservoir contains a value representing all the funds that have been raised to support the affected area from sources other than the state, such as contributions from other states, charities, or individuals. The second reservoir contains the finances of the affected state. Finances for damages add funds from the state and funds from other sources. The last reservoir contains an array of particular areas, which are Food, Infrastructure renewal, Water, Healthcare, Shelters, and Defense elements.

3.2.6. Defense Elements

The Defense element module consists of five sectors focusing on the most essential tools used in practice. All of these sectors overtake initial data from the module The formation of the Tsunami. This model is not directly linked to other modules. However, connection to other modules can be considered. For instance, an apparent connection can be made with the Finance module. Due to the illustrative nature of this model, further development in this direction is not applied. Although the modules are not interconnected, the financial side is also, at least, tentatively mentioned in the individual sections.
  • Self-elevating Seawalls
Figure 10 presents the structure of the variables associated with self-elevating seawalls. Based on experiments and numerical analysis in OpenFOAM, the equations provided in Appendix C were used for calculations.
The hydraulic head between the sea and the port side, where the gate is located, is represented in Equation 19 in Appendix C by the letter h, and this value is set at 2 m. The experimental coefficient value is set at 0.0354 to best determine the velocity in the so-called seepage flow, which is the flow of fluid (water) in the permeable layers, in our case, a rubble wall composed of stones with a diameter of 50 cm.
Next, Surge force per unit width of the wall is reckoned, while the density of seawater is 1.0273   k g m 3 and the surge height is 30   m . The time series of water levels could be represented by the Gaussian distribution, which can reproduce the rapid rise and subsequent fall of the water level η. Time is determined in seconds, and rise time indicates the time required to reach the top of the water level.
Flow discharge via the gap was calculated by taking advantage of Torricelli’s theorem. It is set as a condition because four different situations can occur, depending on the gap width and discharge coefficient setting, which must be lower than 1. The hydraulic head between the seaside and the port side of the gate is again represented by the letter h. The friction loss within the gate gap is set at 2 m. The water depth in the gate gap is set at 4.5 m. The last important value is the correction factor.
Friction loss within the gate gap can be calculated using the Darcy–Welsbach formula. This value should be small when the gate width is narrow. The condition below is based on Torricelli’s theorem. In any case, the discharge coefficient was derived purely from numerical analysis. Therefore, The correction factor aims to adjust the formula by incorporating other energy-dissipating mechanisms that cannot fully reproduce the hydrodynamic model Takagi et al. [131].
The discharge coefficient balances tsunami momentum and energy loss, leading to reduced flow, friction, shrinkage, expansion, and swirling. The larger the coefficient, the more momentum prevails, facilitating the flow of water through the gap. The regression between the discharge coefficient and the hydraulic head was derived for w = 10, 15, 20, 30 cm as follows.
w = 10 cm: IF(h ≤ 2)THEN((0.24 × h) + 0.45) ELSE 0.93
w = 15 cm: −0.04 × h2 + 0.34 h + 0.18
w = 20 cm: 0.15 h + 0.29
w = 30 cm: 0.15 h + 0.25
The model sets the gap width and discharge coefficient as an array.
We can also determine whether the wall is functional or not based on the idea that the width of the gap in the floating breakwater system should be less than 3% of the total port breakwater section Nakashima et al. [132]. If applied condition 19 is met, the breakwater is functional. However, no technical procedure has been proposed to estimate the tsunami influx. The flow through such a constriction is usually complicated, so the resulting flow pattern is not easily subjected to any analytical solution.
The price is only estimated based on the Kamaishi Protection Breakwater in Japan, which is the deepest in the world. The price for 1 m2 = USD 8.954 was determined and based on data from a hypothetical wall in a model for which we know the height, height, and length. So first, we calculate the size of the seawall s i z e = h e i g h t × l e n g h t . We can use the formula c o s t   o f   t h e   w a l l = s i z e   o f   t h e   w a l l × 8.954 , for calculation of the cost of the wall, a hypothetical price in U.S. dollars.
  • Breakwaters
The breakwaters sector, whose structure is presented in Figure 11, requires a wave height as an input value. Data for this particular model are taken from Ooya Harbor. Hudson’s formula [133,134] was used as a starting point during past tsunami events to analyze the stability of the defensive breakwater. According to this formula, the weight of the required armor is proportional to the wave height of the proposed incident. The density of armor has a value of about 133 × 1000 kg/m3. In contrast, the relative underwater density of armor is only 15 × 1000 kg/m3. The slope of the structure was set to 30 rad for this situation. It should be noted that using the Empirically determined damage coefficient value is exposed to wind waves that do not exceed the peak for rubble structures. Therefore, the way the value is used here is not what it was intended for (i.e., for very long periods of waves exceeding rubble structures and breakwaters). Nevertheless, the armor units will benefit from the coupling effect when they resist the forces acting on them due to the tsunami currents. Without any better action, Esteban et al. [135] suggested that the Empirically determined damage coefficient values could be used, although it is clear that further research is needed on this issue.
Unlike formulas such as Van der Meer [136], Hudson’s formula does not provide an indication of the degree of damage that can be expected as a result of an event. However, in order to quantify the strength of the structure, the armor damage was measured by a factor S similar to that used by Van der Meer. The ratio was defined as the ratio between the weight of the required armor and the actual weight of the armor.
  • Vertical deep barrier
The vertical deep barrier sector with the structure presented in Figure 12 requires the input values water depth and gravitational acceleration. Pressure waves from earthquakes and landslides rebound from stable walls and then propagate back into the ocean [137]. High tsunamis develop only at depths of less than about 500 m or even 200 m. All calculations are based on the work of Levin and Nosov [138].
An array is inserted in the amplitude or wave height for easy switching between sample values. We can also determine if the barrier is effective and efficient based on a simple condition I F   e f f i c i e n c y = t s u n a m i   b a r r i e r   h e i g h t > a m p l i t u d e   o r   w a v e   h e i g h t     T H E N   1   E L S E   0 . We can also roughly determine the price based on the tsunami barrier height.
  • Other defense alternatives
Two additional Defense elements were developed only for analytical purposes; their integration into the model is not necessary. These alternatives are the Caisson breakwater (see Figure 13) and the influence of coastal vegetation (see Figure 14).

3.2.7. Environment

This module shows how the tsunami will affect nature on the coast and at sea. There is also a model of drinking water contamination or sea pollution by various wastes. This module is affected by the module The formation of the Tsunami. This module (see Figure 15) is developed based on the work of Srinivas and Nakagawa [139].
There are four reservoirs in this module, namely Dead animals, Contaminated water, Destroyed coastal and sea life, and Waste in the sea. The values of all reservoirs are set to zero at the beginning of the simulation. The meanings of single reservoirs are self-explanatory. There are two arrays applied. In Destroyed coastal and sea life, types of vegetation, such as coral reefs, marine plants, mangrove forests, and coastal vegetation in cubic meters are used. In Waste in the sea, an array of specific types of waste is applied, namely (general) waste, soil, and debris. Waste is measured in kilograms and indicates the number of different types of waste that enter the sea when the wave recedes.

3.2.8. Model Simulation

Due to the main purpose of the model and its illustrative nature, simulations were not used for the analysis or for finding a solution for a specific case or event. The aim was to show the possibilities of system dynamics in connecting various disciplines into one multidisciplinary descriptive mechanism. Therefore, all tests usually executed on the available model, such as what-if or sensitivity analysis, were not conducted. However, the model successfully passed the robustness test under extreme conditions and structural and behavioral tests.
The initial model parametrization is based on values indicated in previous sections presenting particular modules and sectors. Further parametrization is based on data associated with a specific tsunami wave from 2004 in the Banda Aceh area of Indonesia. Further settings can be found in the model, which is included in the Appendix A, Appendix B and Appendix C associated with this manuscript. There is one principal issue associated with the simulation. The model contains processes that take place in various time units. Simple unification is not possible in one model. We can either develop two separate models based on specific time units or use multiple simulations with simultaneous switching off of selected sectors. However, the solution is feasible. The one-hour step was selected as the time unit for the simulations used for all modules except the Formation of tsunami and Defense elements. These two modules use the one-second step. The following figures demonstrate the dynamics of the selected variable in each module. Figure 16 shows the situation of the population 100 h after the start of the simulation. The population was first divided into affected and unaffected populations. The affected population became either injured, uninjured, or dead. Figure 17 shows the size of the destruction in terms of communications and water pipe damage. As determined by the model’s initial parametrization, roads are being repaired in terms tens of hours while the reparation of water pipes is postponed. Figure 18 and Figure 19 present the outputs of the sensitivity analysis. Figure 18 captures the barrier utility at different levels of barrier effectiveness and different levels of potential wave height at impact. The right part of the graph (shown in green and separated by the black line) captures usefulness greater than 91%. The black line (on the right side) defines the region of usefulness between 89% and 91%. The part of the graph between the black lines describes the condition where the barrier application is useful. The left part of the graph (to the left black line) shows the situation where the application of the barrier is counterproductive. Figure 19 captures the change in the utility of barrier application relative to the effectiveness of the barrier and the potential wave height.

4. Study Limitations

This study has several principal limitations, which can be clustered into two segments. The first segment contains issues related to the literature review and analysis that was conducted. The second one is associated with the developed model. As for the former, the first limitation is the incomplete identification of all relevant articles. We were not able to circumvent this limitation because of the use of the term “tsunami” even in a field where it is used in a context other than its original meaning, an example being “obesity tsunami” or “addiction tsunami”, etc. Based on the use of this word, we had to add an auxiliary relevant keyword to remove redundant articles. This step may have caused not all relevant articles to be found. Another limitation is in the search for software used, where not all studies mention the name of the software used and/or do not use the word “software” next to the software name. We were able to partially circumvent this limitation by using a double-machine full-text search, wherein the first step, the retrieved articles were searched for the term “software”, followed by recording the names of the reported software and then performing a full-text search for the names of the retrieved software. Another limitation was that not all articles were found in the full-text version. Additional steps may be taken in future replications or extensions of this study to obtain a comprehensive pool of articles. Moreover, additional resources and paper repositories are available. Searching their content, on the other hand, would result in more redundancy in acquired papers rather than new discoveries. Regarding the model itself, we need to highlight that the purpose of the presented model is to demonstrate the possibility of integrating various disciplines in the investigation of complex multidisciplinary phenomena. Thus, particular modules and subsystems may seem to be incomplete or need to be elaborated. Indeed, they are, and they do need. The main intention is to outline how tsunami research can be at least partially consolidated. Elaboration would lead to a higher density of interconnections, which does not have to support comprehensibility and meaningfulness. Although the presented study is comprehensive, the list of tools, techniques, methods, or software toolkits cannot be fully exhausted. Various software applications are used for particular and specific aspects of tsunami-related science [140]. For instance, the topic of the fragility of constructions due to the tsunami impact (e.g., [141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]) can serve as an example, which is not explored much in this study. However, the goal of this paper was not to create a comprehensive picture of tsunami research but only the part where tsunami-related software and modeling methods are used to investigate tsunamis. In future research, we could compare approaches to tsunami research using software and “software-free” tsunami research. The most significant challenge is related to the time units used in the model. There are processes that are more convenient to simulate in seconds or minutes, while other processes take place in the order of hours or days. Unification in the system dynamics model can be achieved, for instance, by developing the simulation of two separate models. This represents the main research challenge in this domain.

5. Conclusions

With advances in computing power and software for modeling and simulation, the capabilities in the vast majority of scientific fields have advanced [149], and this is also true in the field of tsunami research [150]. In our study, we identified the most widely used software and methods in the tsunami field over the last decade. We also identified the sectors in the tsunami field where software and methods are used. Furthermore, we have assigned each software and method their function for the analyzed article. The most significant software packages in the tsunami research we identified include OpenFOAM, CALIB, MATLAB, ArcGIS, and COMCOT. The methods we have identified belong to various fields of study and are mostly focused on the tsunami origin or its propagation, exploring historical tsunamis based on tsunami deposits, modeling tsunamis in 3D space, identifying tsunami impacts, exploring relevant variables for tsunamis, creating tsunami impact maps, and comparing simulation results with real data. Various methods are applied, such as the Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Constant Rate of Supply Method, Digital Elevation Models, Finite Area Method, Fuzzy C-Means Clustering, and probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis. The importance of finding a tool that would not be over-specialized and narrowly focused on particular aspects of tsunamis needs to be emphasized as the main added value of this study. It is apparent that the existing specialized tools or methods used in particular fields of study need to be applied to find answers to particular domain-related research questions. However, due to the multidisciplinary nature of tsunamis, the more complex systems approach needs to be applied. The holistic view and feedback structures with mutually interconnected parts represent its primary attributes. Data or information acquired by tools, techniques, or modeling software can be used as inputs to more complex models, which would improve understanding and insights into tsunami phenomena. No study used or mentioned the possibility of applying system dynamics as a methodological tool, which focuses on capturing change and behavior over time. This approach is applied in various disciplines. This study demonstrates that the application of system dynamics as a commonly used modeling and simulation methodology can be successfully used for the implementation of the system perspective in tsunami research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z. and V.B.; methodology, V.B., D.P. and P.Č.; software, M.Z., T.N. and M.H.; validation, S.I., P.M. and B.E.S.; formal analysis, B.N.A.; investigation, M.Z., B.N.A., T.N. and D.P.; resources, F.B. and S.I.; data curation, F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z., V.B., T.N., P.Č. and M.H.; writing—review and editing, B.E.S., P.M. and S.I.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, V.B.; project administration, V.B.; funding acquisition, V.B. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The VES20 Inter-Cost LTC 20020 project supported this research. The authors also express gratitude to the COST Action AGITHAR leaders and team members. The Faculty of Informatics and Management UHK Specific research project “Addressing modern research topics with increased student involvement” has also partially supported the research. The authors thank Patrik Urbanik and Jan Boura for their assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. SW tools description.
Table A1. SW tools description.
ToolWebsiteUsageIn Total
Agisofthttps://www.agisoft.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023For photogrammetric process; for image post-processing3
Agisoft Metashape is a stand-alone software product that performs photogrammetric processing of digital images and generates 3D spatial data to be used in GIS applications, cultural heritage documentation, and visual effects production, as well as for indirect measurements of objects of various scales.
Amirahttps://www.thermofisher.com/cz/en/home/electron-microscopy/products/software-em-3d-vis/amira-software.html, accessed on 15 March 2023Tsunami waves visualization1
Amira Software is a comprehensive and versatile 2D–5D solution for visualizing, analyzing, and understanding life science and biomedical research data from many image modalities, including Optical and Electron Microscopy, CT, MRI, and other imaging techniques. With incredible speed and flexibility, Amira Software supports advanced 2D–5D bioimaging workflows in research areas ranging from structural and cellular biology to tissue imaging, neuroscience, preclinical imaging, and bioengineering. From any 3D image data, including time series and multi-channel, Amira Software delivers a comprehensive range of data visualization, processing, and analysis capabilities. Amira Software allows life science and biomedical researchers to gain invaluable insights into their data at different scales and from any modality.
ANSYShttps://www.ansys.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023Modeling and validation of numerical models; to build numerical model; to build a channel domain5
Ansys Discovery is the first simulation-driven design tool to combine instant physics simulation, proven Ansys high-fidelity simulation, and interactive geometry modeling in a single user experience.
ArcGIShttps://www.ArcGIS.com/index.html, accessed on 15 March 2023To identify blocks; for merging and checking data; for calculation of slope gradient; for evacuation potential; to plot a tectonic map; to subtract backscatter and seismic data, the post-slide bathymetry grid; to create map of studied area; for incorporating collected data; to model wave heights and inundation for a range of SLR scenarios15
ArcGIS offers unique capabilities and flexible licensing for applying location-based analytics to your business practices. Gain greater insights using contextual tools to visualize and analyze your data. Collaborate and share via maps, apps, dashboards, and reports.
CALIBhttp://calib.org/calib/, accessed on 15 March 2023To calibrate radiocarbon ages12
Without official description
COMCOThttps://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.512.84&rep=rep1&type=pdf, accessed on 15 March 2023
Note: We could not find official website; included link is to manual for COMCOT software
NSWE solver; to simulate the entire life-span of a tsunami; to simulate tsunami propagation from its origin to coastal areas; to simulate tsunami events; for the wave propagation; to validate combination of time step, grid spacing, and depth9
COMCOT (Cornell Multi-grid Coupled Tsunami model) adopts explicit staggered leap-frog finite difference schemes to solve Shallow Water Equations in both Spherical and Cartesian Coordinates. A nested grid system, dynamically coupled up to 12 levels (which will also be referred to as layers) with different grid resolutions, can be implemented in the model to fulfill the need for tsunami simulations in different scales.
Delft3Dhttps://oss.deltares.nl/web/delft3d, accessed on 15 March 2023To create a grid; to simulate tsunami; to model wave heights and inundation for a range of SLR scenarios4
Delft3D is open-source software and facilitates the hydrodynamic (Delft3D-FLOW module), morphodynamic (Delft3D-MOR module), waves (Delft3D-WAVE module), water quality (Delft3D-WAQ module including the DELWAQ kernel), and particle (Delft3D-PART module) modeling.
DSAShttps://www.usgs.gov/centers/whcmsc/science/digital-shoreline-analysis-system-dsas?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects, accessed on 15 March 2023Determination of coastline change1
The Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) v5.0 software is an add-in to Esri ArcGIS desktop 10.4–10.6 that enables a user to calculate rate-of-change statistics from multiple historical shoreline positions. It provides an automated method for establishing measurement locations, performs rate calculations, provides the statistical data necessary to assess the robustness of the rates, and includes a beta model of shoreline forecasting with the option to generate 10- and/or 20-year shoreline horizons and uncertainty bands.
Fledermaushttps://qps.nl/fledermaus/, accessed on 15 March 2023For digital elevation models1
Fledermaus unlocks the potential of data, with a wide variety of analysis tools working in 3D or 4D space. With fast and easy presentation tools, it shows data better than ever before.
FLOW3Dhttps://www.flow3d.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023Simulate tsunami1
FLOW-3D is an accurate, fast, proven CFD software that solves the toughest free-surface flow problems. A pioneer in the CFD industry and a trusted leader, FLOW-3D is a highly efficient, comprehensive solution for free-surface flow problems with human-centric support.
Gambithttp://geoweb.mit.edu/gg/, accessed on 15 March 2023To generate geometry and meshes of the numerical model1
GAMIT, GLOBK, and TRACK form a comprehensive suite of programs for analyzing GNSS measurements primarily to study crustal deformation. The software has been developed by MIT, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Harvard University with support from the National Science Foundation. The software may be obtained without written agreement or royalty fee by universities and government agencies for any non-commercial purposes.
GeoClawhttp://www.clawpack.org/geoclaw, accessed on 15 March 2023To model tsunami; to simulate tsunami5
It is a variant of Clawpack for geophysical flows. Clawpack is a collection of finite volume methods for linear and nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Clawpack employs high-resolution Godunov-type methods with limiters in a general framework applicable to many kinds of waves. Clawpack is written in Fortran and Python.
Geosoft Oasishttps://www.seequent.com/products-solutions/geosoft-oasis-montaj/, accessed on 15 March 2023To create color surface plot from simulation results1
QA/QC, transform, and analyze all raw data—geology, geochemistry, and geophysics—with powerful 2D and 3D modeling capabilities.
Geowavehttps://www.osgeo.org/projects/geowave/, accessed on 15 March 2023To generate tsunami and wave propagation1
GeoWave is a software library that connects the scalability of distributed computing frameworks and key-value stores with modern geospatial software to store, retrieve, and analyze massive geospatial datasets.
HAZUShttps://www.fema.gov/flood-maps/products-tools/hazus, accessed on 15 March 2023To define building damage states1
FEMA’s Hazus Program provides standardized tools and data for estimating risk from earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, and hurricanes. Hazus models combine expertise from many disciplines to create actionable risk information that increases community resilience. Hazus software is distributed as a GIS-based desktop application with a growing collection of simplified open-source tools. Risk assessment resources from the Hazus program are always freely available and transparently developed.
HydroSed2Dhttps://sourceforge.net/projects/hydrosed2d/, accessed on 15 March 2023To investigate tsunami wave run-up and land inundation on coastal beaches1
HydroSed2D is a two-dimensional numerical model for hydrodynamics and sediment transport on unstructured mesh.
ICEMhttps://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/icem-surf/, accessed on 15 March 2023Mesh generation1
ICEM Surf is the industry-leading Curve and Surface explicit geometry modeling tool for defining, analyzing, and performing high-end visualization of complex free-form shape CAD surface models to the highest quality. Used in product design processes throughout automotive, aerospace, consumer goods, and press-tool design industries, providing solutions for direct surface modeling, refinement, reconstruction, and scan modeling.
MATLABhttps://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html, accessed on 15 March 2023To solve the eigenvalue problem; to compare results and estimate; to compute wind-driven flow; to classify pre- and post-tsunami images; to simulate time steps; to export and reformate grid; to perform gradient-based optimization algorithm; to process data; to solve part of the system15
MATLAB® combines a desktop environment tuned for iterative analysis and design processes with a programming language that expresses matrix and array mathematics directly. It includes the Live Editor for creating scripts that combine code, output, and formatted text in an executable notebook.
MB-Systemhttps://www.mbari.org/products/research-software/mb-system/, accessed on 15 March 2023To calculate seafloor attributes; to generate the one-ninth arc-second coastal DEM2
MB-System is an open-source software package for the processing and display of bathymetry and backscatter imagery data derived from multibeam, interferometry, and sidescan sonars.
OpenFOAMhttps://www.openfoam.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023To develop a nonlinear three-dimensional coupled model; to create 3D model; to use its solver; to calculate the flow field under the water surface; to create model of 3D numerical wave tank; to create model of tsunami barriers and tsunami impacts; to create a hydrodynamic and morphologic model; to create tsunami model; to simulate tsunami; to calculate properties of tsunami25
OpenFOAM is the free, open-source CFD software developed primarily by OpenCFD Ltd. since 2004. It has a large user base across most areas of engineering and science, from both commercial and academic organizations. OpenFOAM has an extensive range of features to solve anything from complex fluid flows involving chemical reactions, turbulence, and heat transfer to acoustics, solid mechanics, and electromagnetics.
OsiriX DICOMhttps://www.osirix-viewer.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023To construct a 3D image of stones and to measure its dimensions, volume, and surface area1
It fully supports the DICOM standard for easy integration in your workflow environment and an open platform for the development of processing tools. It offers advanced post-processing techniques in 2D and 3D, exclusive innovative techniques for 3D and 4D navigation, and a complete integration with any PACS.
QGIShttps://qgis.org/en/site/, accessed on 15 March 2023To create a map; to generate mesh3
QGIS is a professional GIS application that is built on top of and proud to be itself Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS).
R-studiohttps://www.rstudio.com/, accessed on 15 March 2023To calibrate ages of tsunami deposits1
RStudio’s mission is to create free and open-source software for data science, scientific research, and technical communication. We do this to enhance the production and consumption of knowledge by everyone, regardless of economic means, and to facilitate collaboration and reproducible research, both of which are critical to the integrity and efficacy of work in science, education, government, and industry.
reflexWhttps://www.sandmeier-geo.de/reflexw.html, accessed on 15 March 2023To process Ground-Penetrating Radar data1
he software covers the complete range of wave data (seismic, GPR, ultrasound) and the different geometry assemblings (surface reflection and refraction, borehole crosshole and tomography, and combination of borehole and surface measurements). You may also have a look at a one-sided brochure for GPR, reflections seismics, refraction seismics, and borehole application.
SPADhttps://ia-data-analytics.com/data-mining-software/, accessed on 15 March 2023To apply statistical test on data1
Coheris Analytics SPAD is the only software dedicated to Data Mining and Predictive analysis that provides a totally graphical and intuitive interface with powerful features.
tsunami-2dhttps://www.ornl.gov/team/scale/sensitivity-and-uncertainty-analysis-0, accessed on 15 March 2023To apply sensitivity analysis and propagation of uncertainties of cross-sections; to conduct sensitivity and uncertainty analysis2
The TSUNAMI-1D, TSUNAMI-2D, and TSUNAMI-3D analysis sequences compute the sensitivity of keff and reaction rates to energy-dependent cross-section data for each reaction of each nuclide in a system model. The one-dimensional (1D) transport calculations are performed with XSDRNPM, the two-dimensional (2D) transport calculations are performed using NEWT, and the three-dimensional (3D) calculations are performed with KENO V.a or KENO-VI.
VOLNAhttps://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/11/4621/2018/, accessed on 15 March 2023To compare results with presented numerical solver; to simulate tsunami2
A finite-volume nonlinear shallow water equation (NSWE) solver built on the OP2 domain-specific language (DSL) for unstructured mesh computations. VOLNA-OP2 is unique among tsunami solvers in its support for several high-performance computing platforms: central processing units (CPUs), the Intel Xeon Phi, and graphics processing units (GPUs).
Table A2. Usage of methods.
Table A2. Usage of methods.
Abb.MethodUsage
AMSAccelerator Mass SpectrometryTo obtain radiocarbon ages
CFDComputational Fluid DynamicsAs a part of OpenFOAM; model of FLOW3D; to solve a three-dimensional Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations; to investigate solitary wave-induced vertical and horizontal forces on coastal bridges; to predict flow character and dynamic loading profile from an idealized tsunami impact on a coastal community; to simulate impulse wave generation and propagation; to simulate a tsunami
CRSConstant Rate of Supply methodTo develop dates of tsunami deposits
DEMDigital Elevation ModelsTo capture a shielding phenomenon created by the dense buildings; to generate images; for topographical data; to calculate finite difference grid; to calculate a bathymetry and derived seafloor attributes such as slope gradient; to evaluate a model; to generate an inundation zones
FAMFinite Area MethodTo address the problem of fluid information mapped from the three-dimensional space to the two-dimensional space
FCMFuzzy C-Means ClusteringAs part of used method
FEMFinite Element MeshTo create a mesh
FFTFast Fourier TransformTo analyze data; to obtain value for equations
FVCFFinite Volume with Characteristic FluxAs part of equations
FVMFinite Volume MethodTo compute the two-phase incompressible flow with the Navier–Stokes equations; as a solver; as a part of model
GKSGustafsson–Kreiss–Sundström stability theoryTo evaluate penalization
GPRGround-Penetrating RadarFor characterizing the subsurface subsidence structure associated with sinkholes and reconstructing their deformational and tsunami deposit history; to trace extent and morphology
LSWELinear Shallow Water EquationsAs a part of COMCOT; to calculate a tsunami
MAPMaximum a Posteriori ValuesTo calculate an estimate of the maximum water surface elevation standard deviation; to characterize solution of the problem
MCMonte CarloTo combine a probability of occurrence of earthquake; to estimate a relative error; to evaluate an overall uncertainty in tsunami hazard; to generate a synthetic earthquake catalog; to sample a resulting posterior; to confirm robustness of the created index; to vary all uncertain input parameters have been randomly within the specified distribution
MOSTMethod for Splitting Tsunamis To simulate a tsunami; to simulate an earthquake-generated tsunami
MULESMultidimensional Universal Limiter for Explicit Solution To maintain boundedness of a volume fraction; to maintain boundedness of a volume fraction independent of the underlying numerical scheme, mesh structure, etc.
NSWENonlinear Shallow Water EquationsTo calculate a long wave propagation; to simulate protection of small islands; as a base for modified equations; as a governing equation; to describe a propagation problem; to perform numerical simulations of volcanic explosion resulting in a tsunami wave traveling across the water; to solve tsunami equations
PCAPrincipal Component Analysis For a dimensionality reduction; to select relevant variables
PIMPLEPressure Implicit with Splitting of OperatorFor a pressure-velocity solver; to employ a pressure-velocity solver
To solve a velocity and pressure
PISOPressure Implicit with Splitting of Operators To obtain a pressure field; to solve RANS equations with a volume of fluid
PTHAProbabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis As based method for expanded method; for modeling a tsunami
SIMPLESemi-Implicit Method for Pres-sure-Linked EquationsAs a part of PIMPLE
SPHSmoothed Particle Hydrodynamics As a based method for enchanted method; for wave propagation from off- to onshore; to simulate waves; to study the nature of flows for an extreme wave above and in the interior of gravel bedforms
SWEShallow Water EquationsAs a base for a model; for modeling a tsunami with small numbers of observation points in more physically realistic settings; to calculate a model
VOFVolume of Fluid To capture a free surface; to obtain sea-level or mudslide interface location; to figure out the role of vegetation of finite width in energy reduction of flood flow; to track the free surface between two fluids
Table A3. Relationship among tools and research domains.
Table A3. Relationship among tools and research domains.
AgisoftAmiraANSYSArcGISCALIBCOMCOTDelft3DDSASFledermaus FLOW3DGambitGeoClawGeowaveHAZUSHydroSed2DICEMMATLABMB-SystemOpenFOAMOsiriX DICOMQgisR-studioreflexWSPADtsunami-2dVOLNATotal
Applications Geosciences, Multidisciplinary000000000000001000000000001
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary000000000001001000000000002
Computer Science, Theory, and Methods000000000000000010000000001
Engineering, Civil00310110000001003010010000021
Engineering, Environmental000100000000000000100000002
Engineering, Geological100200000010000000000000004
Engineering, Marine0020001000000000208010000014
Engineering, Mechanical000000000000000100200000003
Engineering, Multidisciplinary301000000000000110200000008
Engineering, Ocean00210120000001004016010000028
Environmental Sciences000001000000000001210000005
Geography, Physical000030010000000001000010006
Geochemistry and Geophysics000013000001000030000000008
Geology000020000000000000000100003
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary0108851110131000423030110044
Imaging Science and Photographic Technology000000000000000000001000001
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary001000000000000000000000001
Mathematics, Applied000100000000000010000000013
Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications000000000000000010100000002
Mechanics001000000000000110200000005
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences0003131000011000203000010016
Multidisciplinary Sciences000210100000000000001000016
Nuclear Science and Technology000000000000000000000000101
Oceanography2025311011010000318010001031
Physics, Fluids, and Plasmas001000000000000000100000002
Physics, Mathematical000000000000000010000000001
Remote Sensing000000000000000000001000001
Statistics and Probability000000000000000010000000001
Water Resources0004131000011000106010010020
Total611328201892212832232956511112322

Appendix B. Module Formation of Tsunami: Equations

The following equations are taken from the model created in the Stella Profesional software. In this modeling toolkit, the variables are defined using pseudocode.
p h a s e   v e l o c i t y   o f   t h e   w a v e = g r a v i t a t i o n a l   a c c e l e r a t i o n w a t e r   d e p t h
w a v e   p e r i o d = w a v e   l e n g t h p h a s e   v e l o c i t y   o f   t h e   w a v e
w a v e   l e n g t h = p h a s e   v e l o c i t y   o f   t h e   w a v e w a v e   p e r i o d
w a v e   h e i g h t = 1 w a t e r   d e p t h
e s t i m a t e d   r u n u p = m a x i m u m   w a v e   a m p l i t u d e 4 5 g a u g e   l o c a t i o n   w a t e r   d e p t h 1 5
r u n u p   f a c t o r = w a v e   a p l i t u d e m a x i m u m   r u n u p   h e i g h t
m a x i m u m   r u n u p   h e i g h t = 2.831 cot i n c l i n a t i o n   o f   t h e   c o a s t t s u n a m i   w a v e   h e i g h t   b e f o r e   s h o a l i n g 5 4
I m a m u r a   l i d a   m a g n i t u d e   s c a l e = ln m a x i m u m   r u n u p   h e i g h t ln 2
f l o w   v e l o c i t y   o f   t h e   r u n u p = i n u n d a t i o n   d e p t h 0.7   tan i n c l i n a t i o n   o f   t h e   w a t e r   s u r f a c e M a n n i n g s   r o u g h n e s s   c o e f f i c i e n t
i n u n d a t i o n   d i s t a n c e = 0.06 w a v e   h e i g h t   a t   t h e   s h o r e 3   M a n n i n g s   r o u g h n e s s   c o e f f i c i e n t 2
l o s s   i n   w a v e   h e i g h t   p e r   m e t e r   o f   i n u n d a t i o n   d i s t a n c e = 167 M a n n i n g s   r o u g h n e s s   c o e f f i c i e n t 2 w a v e   h e i g h t   a t   t h e   s h o r e 1 3 + 5 sin g r o u n d   s l o p e
w a v e   r u n u p = 1 + e x p e r i m e n t a l   c o n s t a n t 1 + 2 e x p e r i m e n t a l   c o n s t a n t 2 e x p e r i m e n t a l   c o n s t a n t 2         ( 1         + ( 8 g r a v i t a t i o n a l   a c c e l e r a t i o n M a n n i n g s   r o u g h n e s s   c o e f f i c i e n t 2 0.91 e x p e r i m e n t a l   c o n s t a n t 2         g r o u n d   s l o p e w a v e   h e i g h t   a t   t h e   s h o r e 1 3 ) )

Appendix C. Module Defense Elements: Equations

v e l o c i t y   w i t h i n   r u b b l e   m o u n d = e x p e r i m e n t a l   c o e f f i c i e n t 2 g r a v i t a t i o n a l   a c c e l e r a t i o n h
s u r g e   f o r c e   p e r   u n i t   w i d t h   o f   t h e   w a l l = 4.5 d e n s i t y   o f   s e a w a t e r g r a v i t a t i o n a l   a c c e l e r a t i o n s u r g e   h e i g h t 2
G a u s s i a n   d i s t r i b u t i o n = t s u n a m i   h e i g h t exp t i m e r i s e   t i m e 2 r i s e   t i m e
w e i g h t   o f   r e q u i r e d   a r m o u r = d e n s i t y   o f   a r m o u r w a v e   h e i g h t 3 e m p i r i c a l l y   d e t e r m i n e d   d a m a g e   c o e f f i c i e n t r e l a t i v e   u n d e r w a t e r   d e n s i t y   o f   a r m o u r 1 3 cos s l o p e   o f   s t r u c t u r e

References

  1. Frequently Asked Questions. Available online: http://itic.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133&Itemid=2155 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  2. Nacházel, T.; Babič, F.; Baiguera, M.; Čech, P.; Husáková, M.; Mikulecký, P.; Mls, K.; Ponce, D.; Salmanidou, D.; Štekerová, K.; et al. Tsunami-Related Data: A Review of Available Repositories Used in Scientific Literature. Water 2021, 13, 2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tappin, D.R. The Generation of Tsunamis. In Encyclopedia of Maritime and Offshore Engineering; Carlton, J., Jukes, P., Choo, Y.S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2017; pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-1-118-47635-2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tsunamis. Available online: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/tsunamis (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  5. Monecke, K.; Finger, W.; Klarer, D.; Kongko, W.; McAdoo, B.G.; Moore, A.L.; Sudrajat, S.U. A 1000-Year Sediment Record of Tsunami Recurrence in Northern Sumatra. Nature 2008, 455, 1232–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borrero, J.C. Field Survey of Northern Sumatra and Banda Aceh, Indonesia after the Tsunami and Earthquake of 26 December 2004. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2005, 76, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macías, J.; Castro, M.J.; Ortega, S.; Escalante, C.; González-Vida, J.M. Performance Benchmarking of Tsunami-HySEA Model for NTHMP’s Inundation Mapping Activities. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2017, 174, 3147–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. López-Venegas, A.M.; Horrillo, J.; Pampell-Manis, A.; Huérfano, V.; Mercado, A. Advanced Tsunami Numerical Simulations and Energy Considerations by Use of 3D–2D Coupled Models: The October 11, 1918, Mona Passage Tsunami. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 1679–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wendt, J.; Oglesby, D.D.; Geist, E.L. Tsunamis and Splay Fault Dynamics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mulia, I.E.; Gusman, A.R.; Satake, K. Alternative to Non-Linear Model for Simulating Tsunami Inundation in Real-Time. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 214, 2002–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arcos, M.E.M.; LeVeque, R.J. Validating Velocities in the GeoClaw Tsunami Model Using Observations near Hawaii from the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 849–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Palupi, L.S. Psychological Preparedness for Disaster of Coastal Communities: A Systematic Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 649, 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fernandez, A.; Black, J.; Jones, M.; Wilson, L.; Salvador-Carulla, L.; Astell-Burt, T.; Black, D. Flooding and Mental Health: A Systematic Mapping Review. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. PRISMA. The PRISMA 2020 Statement. Available online: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.n71 (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  15. Adobe. Available online: https://www.adobe.com/ (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  16. VOSviewer. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com// (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  17. Williams, A.; Kennedy, S.; Philipp, F.; Whiteman, G. Systems Thinking: A Review of Sustainability Management Research. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 148, 866–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bureš, V.; Rácz, F. Identification of Sustainability Key Factors Based on Capturing Dominant Feedbacks of Behavioural Stereotypes in Socio-Economic Systems. Systems 2017, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barlas, Y. Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 1996, 12, 183–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Zhu, X.; He, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Z. 3D Modeling and Mechanism Analysis of Breaking Wave-Induced Seabed Scour around Monopile. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qin, X.; Motley, M.; LeVeque, R.; Gonzalez, F.; Mueller, K. A Comparison of a Two-Dimensional Depth-Averaged Flow Model and a Three-Dimensional RANS Model for Predicting Tsunami Inundation and Fluid Forces. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 18, 2489–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Autret, R.; Dodet, G.; Fichaut, B.; Suanez, S.; David, L.; Leckler, F.; Ardhuin, F.; Ammann, J.; Grandjean, P.; Allemand, P.; et al. A Comprehensive Hydro-Geomorphic Study of Cliff-Top Storm Deposits on Banneg Island during Winter 2013–2014. Mar. Geol. 2016, 382, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiong, Y.; Liang, Q.; Park, H.; Cox, D.; Wang, G. A Deterministic Approach for Assessing Tsunami-Induced Building Damage through Quantification of Hydrodynamic Forces. Coast. Eng. 2019, 144, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bellotti, G. A Modal Decomposition Method for the Analysis of Long Waves Amplification at Coastal Areas. Coast. Eng. 2020, 157, 103632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abril, J.M.; Periáñez, R. A Modelling Study on Tsunami Propagation in the Red Sea: Historical Events, Potential Hazards and Spectral Analysis. Ocean Eng. 2017, 134, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, Y.; Jia, M.; Mao, D.; Deng, Z.; Liu, X. A Numerical Investigation of the Reduction of Solitary Wave Runup by A Row of Vertical Slotted Piles. China Ocean Eng. 2020, 34, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tan, H.; Ruffini, G.; Heller, V.; Chen, S. A Numerical Landslide-Tsunami Hazard Assessment Technique Applied on Hypothetical Scenarios at Es Vedrà, Offshore Ibiza. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Knighton, J.; Bastidas, L.A. A Proposed Probabilistic Seismic Tsunami Hazard Analysis Methodology. Nat. Hazards 2015, 78, 699–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Horrillo, J.; Wood, A.; Kim, G.-B.; Parambath, A. A Simplified 3-D Navier-Stokes Numerical Model for Landslide-Tsunami: Application to the Gulf of Mexico: A Simplified 3-D Tsunami Numerical Model. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean 2013, 118, 6934–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kevlahan, N.K.-R.; Dubos, T.; Aechtner, M. Adaptive Wavelet Simulation of Global Ocean Dynamics Using a New Brinkman Volume Penalization. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2015, 8, 3891–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Aristodemo, F.; Tripepi, G.; Algieri Ferraro, D.; Veltri, P. An Experimental and Numerical Study on Solitary Wave Loads at Cylinders near the Bed. Ocean Eng. 2020, 195, 106747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, X.; Liu, P.L.-F. An Explicit Finite Difference Model for Simulating Weakly Nonlinear and Weakly Dispersive Waves over Slowly Varying Water Depth. Coast. Eng. 2011, 58, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Völker, D.; Scholz, F.; Geersen, J. Analysis of Submarine Landsliding in the Rupture Area of the 27 February 2010 Maule Earthquake, Central Chile. Mar. Geol. 2011, 288, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Flouri, E.T.; Kalligeris, N.; Alexandrakis, G.; Kampanis, N.A.; Synolakis, C.E. Application of a Finite Difference Computational Model to the Simulation of Earthquake Generated Tsunamis. Appl. Numer. Math. 2013, 67, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Restrepo, A.J.D. Assessing the Effect of Sea-Level Change and Human Activities on a Major Delta on the Pacific Coast of Northern South America: The Patía River. Geomorphology 2012, 151–152, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giraldi, L.; Le Maître, O.P.; Mandli, K.T.; Dawson, C.N.; Hoteit, I.; Knio, O.M. Bayesian Inference of Earthquake Parameters from Buoy Data Using a Polynomial Chaos-Based Surrogate. Comput. Geosci. 2017, 21, 683–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stefanakis, T.S.; Contal, E.; Vayatis, N.; Dias, F.; Synolakis, C.E. Can Small Islands Protect Nearby Coasts from Tsunamis? An Active Experimental Design Approach. Proc. R. Soc. A 2014, 470, 20140575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abril-Hernández, J.M.; Periáñez, R.; O’Connor, J.E.; Garcia-Castellanos, D. Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of the Late Pleistocene Lake Bonneville Flood. J. Hydrol. 2018, 561, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mehrotra, A.; Singh, K.K.; Nigam, M.J.; Pal, K. Detection of Tsunami-Induced Changes Using Generalized Improved Fuzzy Radial Basis Function Neural Network. Nat. Hazards 2015, 77, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Amante, C.J. Estimating Coastal Digital Elevation Model Uncertainty. J. Coast. Res. 2018, 34, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mitsui, J.; Matsumoto, A.; Hanzawa, M.; Nadaoka, K. Estimation Method of Armor Stability Against Tsunami Overtopping Caisson Breakwater Based on Overflow Depth. Coast. Eng. J. 2016, 58, 1640019-1–1640019-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, D.; Dong, Y. Experimental and 3D Numerical Investigation of Solitary Wave Forces on Coastal Bridges. Ocean Eng. 2020, 209, 107499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Förster, A.; Ellis, R.G.; Henrich, R.; Krastel, S.; Kopf, A.J. Geotechnical Characterization and Strain Analyses of Sediment in the Mauritania Slide Complex, NW-Africa. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2010, 27, 1175–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Puga-Bernabéu, Á.; Beaman, R.J.; Webster, J.M.; Thomas, A.L.; Jacobsen, G. Gloria Knolls Slide: A Prominent Submarine Landslide Complex on the Great Barrier Reef Margin of North-Eastern Australia. Mar. Geol. 2017, 385, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bourget, J.; Zaragosi, S.; Ellouz-Zimmermann, S.; Ducassou, E.; Prins, M.A.; Garlan, T.; Lanfumey, V.; Schneider, J.-L.; Rouillard, P.; Giraudeau, J. Highstand vs. Lowstand Turbidite System Growth in the Makran Active Margin: Imprints of High-Frequency External Controls on Sediment Delivery Mechanisms to Deep Water Systems. Mar. Geol. 2010, 274, 187–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Smith, D.E.; Davies, M.H.; Brooks, C.L.; Mighall, T.M.; Dawson, S.; Rea, B.R.; Jordan, J.T.; Holloway, L.K. Holocene Relative Sea Levels and Related Prehistoric Activity in the Forth Lowland, Scotland, United Kingdom. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2010, 29, 2382–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baumann, J.; Chaumillon, E.; Bertin, X.; Schneider, J.-L.; Guillot, B.; Schmutz, M. Importance of Infragravity Waves for the Generation of Washover Deposits. Mar. Geol. 2017, 391, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ali, A.; Pasha, G.A.; Ghani, U.; Ahmed, A.; Abbas, F.M. Investigating Role of Vegetation in Protection of Houses during Floods. Civ. Eng. J. 2019, 5, 2598–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Torres, C.E.; Calisto, I.; Figueroa, D. Magnetic Signals at Easter Island During the 2010 and 2015 Chilean Tsunamis Compared with Numerical Models. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2019, 176, 3167–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Polonia, A.; Bonatti, E.; Camerlenghi, A.; Lucchi, R.G.; Panieri, G.; Gasperini, L. Mediterranean Megaturbidite Triggered by the AD 365 Crete Earthquake and Tsunami. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Dutykh, D.; Clamond, D. Modified Shallow Water Equations for Significantly Varying Seabeds. Appl. Math. Model. 2016, 40, 9767–9787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jing, H.; Zhang, H.; Yuen, D.A.; Shi, Y. Numerical Analysis of Wave Hazards in a Harbor. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2012, 55, 1554–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jiang, C.; Liu, X.; Yao, Y.; Deng, B. Numerical Investigation of Solitary Wave Interaction with a Row of Vertical Slotted Piles on a Sloping Beach. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2019, 11, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarjamee, S.; Nistor, I.; Mohammadian, A. Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Extreme Hydrodynamic Forces on the Geometry of Structures Using OpenFOAM. Nat. Hazards 2017, 87, 213–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, J.; Qi, M.; Fuhrman, D.R. Numerical Modeling of Flow and Morphology Induced by a Solitary Wave on a Sloping Beach. Appl. Ocean Res. 2019, 82, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ruffini, G.; Heller, V.; Briganti, R. Numerical Modelling of Landslide-Tsunami Propagation in a Wide Range of Idealised Water Body Geometries. Coast. Eng. 2019, 153, 103518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wijetunge, J.J. Numerical Simulation and Field Survey of Inundation Due to 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami in Trincomalee, Sri Lanka. Nat. Hazards 2010, 54, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ulvrová, M.; Paris, R.; Kelfoun, K.; Nomikou, P. Numerical Simulations of Tsunamis Generated by Underwater Volcanic Explosions at Karymskoye Lake (Kamchatka, Russia) and Kolumbo Volcano (Aegean Sea, Greece). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, H.; Zhang, M.; Ji, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, T. Numerical Study of Tsunami Wave Run-up and Land Inundation on Coastal Vegetated Beaches. Comput. Geosci. 2019, 132, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kevlahan, N.K.-R.; Khan, R.; Protas, B. On the Convergence of Data Assimilation for the One-Dimensional Shallow Water Equations with Sparse Observations. Adv. Comput. Math. 2019, 45, 3195–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Douglas, S.; Nistor, I. On the Effect of Bed Condition on the Development of Tsunami-Induced Loading on Structures Using OpenFOAM. Nat. Hazards 2015, 76, 1335–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bartzke, G.; Podszun, L.; Huhn, K. On the Role of Fluid Infiltration into Gravel Dunes—Using a 3D Numerical Model. Mar. Geol. 2016, 380, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. San Pedro, L.; Babonneau, N.; Gutscher, M.-A.; Cattaneo, A. Origin and Chronology of the Augias Deposit in the Ionian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea), Based on New Regional Sedimentological Data. Mar. Geol. 2017, 384, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Premasiri, R.; Styles, P.; Shrira, V.; Cassidy, N.; Schwenninger, J.-L. OSL Dating and GPR Mapping of Palaeotsunami Inundation: A 4000-Year History of Indian Ocean Tsunamis as Recorded in Sri Lanka. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2015, 172, 3357–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cheff, I.; Nistor, I.; Palermo, D. Pedestrian Evacuation Modelling of a Canadian West Coast Community from a Near-Field Tsunami Event. Nat. Hazards 2019, 98, 229–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, X.; Niu, X. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment and Its Application to Southeast Coast of Hainan Island from Manila Trench. Coast. Eng. 2020, 155, 103596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Juran, L.; Adams, E.A.; Prajapati, S. Purity, Pollution, and Space: Barriers to Latrine Adoption in Post-Disaster India. Environ. Manag. 2019, 64, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sraj, I.; Mandli, K.T.; Knio, O.M.; Dawson, C.N.; Hoteit, I. Quantifying Uncertainties in Fault Slip Distribution during the Tōhoku Tsunami Using Polynomial Chaos. Ocean Dyn. 2017, 67, 1535–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Triantafyllou, I.; Novikova, T.; Charalampakis, M.; Fokaefs, A.; Papadopoulos, G.A. Quantitative Tsunami Risk Assessment in Terms of Building Replacement Cost Based on Tsunami Modelling and GIS Methods: The Case of Crete Isl., Hellenic Arc. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2019, 176, 3207–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, G.-Y.; Liu, C.-C.; Wijetunge, J.J.; Wang, Y.-F. Reciprocal Green’s Functions and the Quick Forecast of Submarine Landslide Tsunamis. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 20, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reinhardt, E.G.; Nairn, R.B.; Lopez, G. Recovery Estimates for the Río Cruces after the May 1960 Chilean Earthquake. Mar. Geol. 2010, 269, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stefanakis, T.S.; Xu, S.; Dutykh, D.; Dias, F. Run-up Amplification of Transient Long Waves. Quart. Appl. Math. 2015, 73, 177–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Álvarez-Gómez, J.A.; Aniel-Quiroga, Í.; González, M.; Olabarrieta, M.; Carreño, E. Scenarios for Earthquake-Generated Tsunamis on a Complex Tectonic Area of Diffuse Deformation and Low Velocity: The Alboran Sea, Western Mediterranean. Mar. Geol. 2011, 284, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Çağatay, M.N.; Erel, L.; Bellucci, L.G.; Polonia, A.; Gasperini, L.; Eriş, K.K.; Sancar, Ü.; Biltekin, D.; Uçarkuş, G.; Ülgen, U.B.; et al. Sedimentary Earthquake Records in the İzmit Gulf, Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Sediment. Geol. 2012, 282, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dahanayake, K.; Kulasena, N.; Ravi Prasad, G.V.; Dutta, K.; Ray, D.K. Sedimentological and 14C Dating Studies of Past Tsunami Events in Southern Sri Lanka. Nat. Hazards 2012, 63, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vött, A.; Lang, F.; Brückner, H.; Gaki-Papanastassiou, K.; Maroukian, H.; Papanastassiou, D.; Giannikos, A.; Hadler, H.; Handl, M.; Ntageretzis, K.; et al. Sedimentological and Geoarchaeological Evidence of Multiple Tsunamigenic Imprint on the Bay of Palairos-Pogonia (Akarnania, NW Greece). Quat. Int. 2011, 242, 213–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yakupoğlu, N.; Uçarkuş, G.; Kadir Eriş, K.; Henry, P.; Namık Çağatay, M. Sedimentological and Geochemical Evidence for Seismoturbidite Generation in the Kumburgaz Basin, Sea of Marmara: Implications for Earthquake Recurrence along the Central High Segment of the North Anatolian Fault. Sediment. Geol. 2019, 380, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stiros, S.C.; Blackman, D.J. Seismic Coastal Uplift and Subsidence in Rhodes Island, Aegean Arc: Evidence from an Uplifted Ancient Harbour. Tectonophysics 2014, 611, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ma, Z.; Zhou, T.; Sun, J.; Zhai, G. Simulation on Tsunami-like Solitary Wave Run-up around a Conical Island Using a Modified Mass Source Method. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2019, 13, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sarfaraz, M.; Pak, A. SPH Numerical Simulation of Tsunami Wave Forces Impinged on Bridge Superstructures. Coast. Eng. 2017, 121, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, W.; Lai, W.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Li, F. Study on Generation Mechanism of Vertical Force Peak Values on T-Girder Attacked by Tsunami Bore. Ocean Eng. 2020, 196, 106782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Webster, J.M.; George, N.P.J.; Beaman, R.J.; Hill, J.; Puga-Bernabéu, Á.; Hinestrosa, G.; Abbey, E.A.; Daniell, J.J. Submarine Landslides on the Great Barrier Reef Shelf Edge and Upper Slope: A Mechanism for Generating Tsunamis on the North-East Australian Coast? Mar. Geol. 2016, 371, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fabregat, I.; Gutiérrez, F.; Roqué, C.; Zarroca, M.; Linares, R.; Comas, X.; Guerrero, J.; Carbonel, D. Subsidence Mechanisms and Sedimentation in Alluvial Sinkholes Inferred from Trenching and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). Implications for Subsidence and Flooding Hazard Assessment. Quat. Int. 2019, 525, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gylfadóttir, S.S.; Kim, J.; Helgason, J.K.; Brynjólfsson, S.; Höskuldsson, Á.; Jóhannesson, T.; Harbitz, C.B.; Løvholt, F. The 2014 L Ake A Skja Rockslide-induced Tsunami: Optimization of Numerical Tsunami Model Using Observed Data. JGR Ocean 2017, 122, 4110–4122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Higman, B.; Shugar, D.H.; Stark, C.P.; Ekström, G.; Koppes, M.N.; Lynett, P.; Dufresne, A.; Haeussler, P.J.; Geertsema, M.; Gulick, S.; et al. The 2015 Landslide and Tsunami in Taan Fiord, Alaska. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Xing, A.; Xu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, Y. The August 27, 2014, Rock Avalanche and Related Impulse Water Waves in Fuquan, Guizhou, China. Landslides 2016, 13, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Dall’Osso, F.; Dominey-Howes, D.; Moore, C.; Summerhayes, S.; Withycombe, G. The Exposure of Sydney (Australia) to Earthquake-Generated Tsunamis, Storms and Sea Level Rise: A Probabilistic Multi-Hazard Approach. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Xie, P.; Chu, V.H. The Forces of Tsunami Waves on a Vertical Wall and on a Structure of Finite Width. Coast. Eng. 2019, 149, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Creach, A.; Pardo, S.; Guillotreau, P.; Mercier, D. The Use of a Micro-Scale Index to Identify Potential Death Risk Areas Due to Coastal Flood Surges: Lessons from Storm Xynthia on the French Atlantic Coast. Nat. Hazards 2015, 77, 1679–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qin, X.; Motley, M.R.; Marafi, N.A. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Tsunami Forces on Coastal Communities. Coast. Eng. 2018, 140, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Álvarez-Gómez, J.A.; Aniel-Quiroga, Í.; Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, O.Q.; Larreynaga, J.; González, M.; Castro, M.; Gavidia, F.; Aguirre-Ayerbe, I.; González-Riancho, P.; Carreño, E. Tsunami Hazard Assessment in El Salvador, Central America, from Seismic Sources through Flooding Numerical Models. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 13, 2927–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. DeDontney, N.; Rice, J.R. Tsunami Wave Analysis and Possibility of Splay Fault Rupture During the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2012, 169, 1707–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cariolet, J.-M. Use of High Water Marks and Eyewitness Accounts to Delineate Flooded Coastal Areas: The Case of Storm Johanna (10 March 2008) in Brittany, France. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2010, 53, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Boshenyatov, B.; Zhiltsov, K. Vortex Suppression of Tsunami-like Waves by Underwater Barriers. Ocean Eng. 2019, 183, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Reynolds, M.H.; Courtot, K.N.; Berkowitz, P.; Storlazzi, C.D.; Moore, J.; Flint, E. Will the Effects of Sea-Level Rise Create Ecological Traps for Pacific Island Seabirds? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Benazir; Syamsidik; Idris, Y.; Putra, N. Connecting Community’s Perspectives on Tsunami Risk to Anticipated Future Tsunamis: A Reflection from a Progress of Tsunami Preparedness from a Coastal Community in Aceh-Indonesia after 19 Years of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Geoenviron. Disasters 2023, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rauter, M.; Hosse, L.; Mulligan, R.; Take, W.; Lovholt, F. Numerical Simulation of Impulse Wave Generation by Idealized Landslides with OpenFOAM. Coast. Eng. 2021, 165, 103815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nemati, F.; Leonard, L.; Thomson, R.; Lintern, G.; Kouhi, S. Numerical Modeling of a Potential Landslide-Generated Tsunami in the Southern Strait of Georgia. Nat. Hazards 2023, 117, 2029–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Guo, R.; Lo, P. Numerical Investigation on Solitary Wave Interaction with a Vertical Cylinder over a Viscous Mud Bed. Water 2022, 14, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Attili, T.; Heller, V.; Triantafyllou, S. A Numerical Investigation of Tsunamis Impacting Dams. Coast. Eng. 2021, 169, 103942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pakoksung, K.; Suppasri, A.; Imamura, F. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis of Inundated Buildings Following a Subaqueous Volcanic Explosion Based on the 1716 Tsunami Scenario in Taal Lake, Philippines. Geosciences 2021, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Song, Y.; Jia, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, F.; Fang, Q. Numerical Study on Tsunami Force on Coastal Bridge Decks with Superelevation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Elsheikh, N.; Nistor, I.; Azimi, A.; Mohammadian, A. Tsunami-Induced Bore Propagating over a Canal-Part 1: Laboratory Experiments and Numerical Validation. Fluids 2022, 7, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rahuman, S.; Ismail, A.; Varghese, S.; Toworfe, G. Comparative Study of Flow Patterns around Rhizophora and Avicennia Mangrove Roots Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 8992513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Amina; Tanaka, N. Numerical Investigation of 3D Flow Properties around Finite Emergent Vegetation by Using the Two-Phase Volume of Fluid (VOF) Modeling Technique. Fluids 2022, 7, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liu, J.; Hayatdavoodi, M. On Solitary Wave Breaking and Impact on a Horizontal Deck. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Paulin, D.; Jasra, A.; Beskos, A.; Crisan, D. A 4D-Var Method with Flow-Dependent Background Covariances for the Shallow-Water Equations. Stat. Comput. 2022, 32, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kalligeris, N.; Skanavis, V.; Charalampakis, M.; Melis, N.; Voukouvalas, E.; Annunziato, A.; Synolakis, C. Field Survey of the 30 October 2020 Samos (Aegean Sea) Tsunami in the Greek Islands. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 2022, 20, 7873–7905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Tong, S.; Vanden-Eijnden, E.; Stadler, G. Estimating Earthquake-Induced Tsunami Height Probabilities without Sampling. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2023, 180, 1587–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dai, X.; Schneider-Muntau, B.; Fellin, W.; Franco, A.; Gems, B. Engineering-Geological Analysis of a Subaerial Landslide in Taan Fiord, Alaska. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Madden, I.; Marras, S.; Suckale, J. Leveraging Google’s Tensor Processing Units for Tsunami-Risk Mitigation Planning in the Pacific Northwest and Beyond. Geosci. Model Dev. 2023, 16, 3479–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yuan, Y.; Li, H.; Wei, Y.; Shi, F.; Wang, Z.; Hou, J.; Wang, P.; Xu, Z. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment (PTHA) for Southeast Coast of Chinese Mainland and Taiwan Island. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2021, 126, e2020JB020344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Celikbas, B.; Tufekci-Enginar, D.; Dogan, G.; Kolat, C.; Santini, M.; Annunziato, A.; Necmioglu, O.; Yalciner, A.; Suzen, M. Pedestrian Evacuation Time Calculation against Tsunami Hazard for Southern Coasts of Bodrum Peninsula. Nat. Hazards 2023, 119, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zengaffinen-Morris, T.; Urgeles, R.; Lovholt, F. On the Inference of Tsunami Uncertainties From Landslide Run-Out Observations. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean 2022, 127, e2021JC018033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mokhtarzadeh, G.; Basirat, S.; Bazargan, J.; Delavari, E. Impulse Wave Generation: A Comparison of Landslides of Block and Granular Masses by Coupled Lagrangian Tracking Using VOF over a Set Mesh. Water Supply 2022, 22, 510–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mu, D.; Chen, L.; Ning, D. Modeling Impact Load on a Vertical Cylinder in Dam-Break Flows. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dai, Z.; Li, X.; Lan, B. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Tsunami Waves Triggered by Submarine Landslides Based on the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, M.; Huang, W.; Qiu, J. A High-Order Well-Balanced Positivity-Preserving Moving Mesh DG Method for the Shallow Water Equations With Non-Flat Bottom Topography. J. Sci. Comput. 2021, 87, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ersoy, H.; Sünnetci, M.; Karahan, M.; Perinçek, D. 3D Simulations of Impulse Waves Originating from Concurrent Landslides near an Active Fault Using FLOW-3D Software: A Case Study of Cetin Dam Reservoir (Southeast Turkey). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2022, 81, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Paris, A.; Heinrich, P.; Abadie, S. Landslide Tsunamis: Comparison between Depth-Averaged and Navier-Stokes Models. Coast. Eng. 2021, 170, 104022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Lo Re, C.; Manno, G.; Basile, M.; Ferrotto, M.; Cavaleri, L.; Ciraolo, G. Tsunami Vulnerability Evaluation for a Small Ancient Village on Eastern Sicily Coast. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Takegawa, N.; Sawada, Y.; Furuichi, N. Strategic Coastal Dike Shape for Enhanced Tsunami Overflow Reduction. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0292930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Papadopoulos, G.A.; Imamura, F. A Proposal for a New Tsunami Intensity Scale. ITS Proc. 2001, 5, 569–577. [Google Scholar]
  124. The Engineering ToolBox. Available online: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/mannings-roughness-d_799.html (accessed on 1 July 2023).
  125. Leone, F.; Lavigne, F.; Paris, R.; Denain, J.-C.; Vinet, F. A Spatial Analysis of the December 26th, 2004 Tsunami-Induced Damages: Lessons Learned for a Better Risk Assessment Integrating Buildings Vulnerability. Appl. Geogr. 2011, 31, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rossetto, T.; Peiris, N.; Pomonis, A.; Wilkinson, S.M.; Del Re, D.; Koo, R.; Gallocher, S. The Indian Ocean Tsunami of December 26, 2004: Observations in Sri Lanka and Thailand. Nat. Hazards 2007, 42, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ghobarah, A.; Saatcioglu, M.; Nistor, I. The Impact of the 26 December 2004 Earthquake and Tsunami on Structures and Infrastructure. Eng. Struct. 2006, 28, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Valencia, N.; Gardi, A.; Gauraz, A.; Leone, F.; Guillande, R. New Tsunami Damage Functions Developed in the Framework of SCHEMA Project: Application to European-Mediterranean Coasts. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 11, 2835–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Heger, M.P.; Neumayer, E. The Impact of the Indian Ocean Tsunami on Aceh’s Long-Term Economic Growth. J. Dev. Econ. 2019, 141, 102365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kweifio-Okai, C. Where Did the Indian Ocean Tsunami Aid Money Go? In The Guardian; Kings Place: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  131. Takagi, H.; Tomiyasu, R.; Oyake, T.; Araki, T.; Mori, K.; Matsubara, Y.; Ninomiya, Y.; Takata, Y. Tsunami Intrusion through Port Breakwaters Enclosed with Self-Elevating Seawalls. Ocean Eng. 2020, 199, 107028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nakashima, S.; Takayama, T.; Obara, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Kurokawa, F.; Onodera, T. Performance Based Design of Vertically Telescopic Breakwater for Protection from Tsunami. J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. Ser. B2 Coast. Eng. 2011, 67, I_786–I_790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kamphuis, J.W. Introduction to Coastal Engineering and Management; World Scientific: Singapore, 2020; Volume 48, ISBN 9811208018. [Google Scholar]
  134. Coastal Engineering Research Center. Shore Protection Manual, 4th ed.; Coastal Engineering Research Center: Ford Belvoir, VA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  135. Esteban, M.; Thao, N.D.; Takagi, H.; Jayaratne, R.; Mikami, T.; Shibayama, T. Stability of Breakwaters against Tsunami Attack. In Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 293–323. ISBN 978-0-12-801060-0. [Google Scholar]
  136. Van der Meer, J.W. Stability of Breakwater Armour Layers—Design Formulae. Coast. Eng. 1987, 11, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Scheel, H.J. New Type of Tsunami Barrier. Nat. Hazards 2014, 70, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Levin, B.W.; Nosov, M. Physics of Tsunamis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 327. [Google Scholar]
  139. Srinivas, H.; Nakagawa, Y. Environmental Implications for Disaster Preparedness: Lessons Learnt from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 89, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Marras, S.; Mandli, K.T. Modeling and Simulation of Tsunami Impact: A Short Review of Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Geosciences 2020, 11, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Belliazzi, S.; Lignola, G.P.; Di Ludovico, M.; Prota, A. Preliminary Tsunami Analytical Fragility Functions Proposal for Italian Coastal Residential Masonry Buildings. Structures 2021, 31, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cavaleri, L.; Ciraolo, G.; Ferrotto, M.F.; La Loggia, G.; Lo Re, C.; Manno, G. Masonry Structures Subjected to Tsunami Loads: Modeling Issues and Application to a Case Study. Structures 2020, 27, 2192–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Del Zoppo, M.; Wijesundara, K.; Rossetto, T.; Dias, P.; Baiguera, M.; Di Ludovico, M.; Thamboo, J.; Prota, A. Influence of Exterior Infill Walls on the Performance of RC Frames under Tsunami Loads: Case Study of School Buildings in Sri Lanka. Eng. Struct. 2021, 234, 111920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ferrotto, M.F.; Cavaleri, L. Masonry Structures: A Proposal of Analytical Generation of Fragility Functions for Tsunami Impact—Application to the Mediterranean Coasts. Eng. Struct. 2021, 242, 112463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Medina, S.; Lizarazo-Marriaga, J.; Estrada, M.; Koshimura, S.; Mas, E.; Adriano, B. Tsunami Analytical Fragility Curves for the Colombian Pacific Coast: A Reinforced Concrete Building Example. Eng. Struct. 2019, 196, 109309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mei, H.; Guo, A. Performance of RC Shear Keys on Coastal Bridges under Multi-Hazard Actions of Earthquake and Sequent Tsunami. Structures 2024, 65, 106672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Oddo, M.C.; Asteris, P.G.; Cavaleri, L. Monte Carlo Analysis of Masonry Structures under Tsunami Action: Reliability of Lognormal Fragility Curves and Overall Uncertainty Prediction. Structures 2024, 63, 106421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Xu, J.-G.; Wu, G.; Feng, D.-C.; Fan, J.-J. Probabilistic Multi-Hazard Fragility Analysis of RC Bridges under Earthquake-Tsunami Sequential Events. Eng. Struct. 2021, 238, 112250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Birta, L.G.; Arbez, G. Modelling and Simulation: Exploring Dynamic System Behaviour; Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-3-030-18868-9. [Google Scholar]
  150. Shuto, N.; Fujima, K. A Short History of Tsunami Research and Countermeasures in Japan. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 2009, 85, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA stages (own work; template adopted from [14]).
Figure 1. PRISMA stages (own work; template adopted from [14]).
Sci 06 00039 g001
Figure 2. The interconnectedness of methods and techniques. Note: This figure shows the interconnectedness of the keywords mentioned in the analyzed articles. In the figure, there is one larger cluster mainly focused on modeling and many smaller clusters that refer to the specifics of different models (own work; software: VOSviewer [16]).
Figure 2. The interconnectedness of methods and techniques. Note: This figure shows the interconnectedness of the keywords mentioned in the analyzed articles. In the figure, there is one larger cluster mainly focused on modeling and many smaller clusters that refer to the specifics of different models (own work; software: VOSviewer [16]).
Sci 06 00039 g002
Figure 3. The interconnectedness of methods, tools, and SW applications with their tools. Note: This figure shows the interconnectedness of using the different tsunami modeling tools. Unlike the previous figure focusing on keywords, the individual tools are quite significantly interconnected (own work; software: VOSviewer [16]).
Figure 3. The interconnectedness of methods, tools, and SW applications with their tools. Note: This figure shows the interconnectedness of using the different tsunami modeling tools. Unlike the previous figure focusing on keywords, the individual tools are quite significantly interconnected (own work; software: VOSviewer [16]).
Sci 06 00039 g003
Figure 4. (a) Part of SD model: tsunami formation, seismic activity. Note: This part of the diagram shows the formation of a tsunami from seismic activity (own work; software: Stella Professional). (b) Part of SD model: tsunami formation. Note: This segment of the diagram focuses on wave formation The area dealing with wave height shows that it is affected by water depth, wave amplitude, and wave propagation speed. The section dedicated to wave run-up illustrates how run-up is influenced by ground slope, surface roughness, and the loss in wave height per meter of inundation distance. The part of the diagram concerning waves behind a barrier includes factors like barrier level and barrier efficiency. This segment of the diagram focuses on tsunami simulation and includes parameters such as assumed water depth, assumed tsunami height, and wave distribution after propagating over various terrains (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 4. (a) Part of SD model: tsunami formation, seismic activity. Note: This part of the diagram shows the formation of a tsunami from seismic activity (own work; software: Stella Professional). (b) Part of SD model: tsunami formation. Note: This segment of the diagram focuses on wave formation The area dealing with wave height shows that it is affected by water depth, wave amplitude, and wave propagation speed. The section dedicated to wave run-up illustrates how run-up is influenced by ground slope, surface roughness, and the loss in wave height per meter of inundation distance. The part of the diagram concerning waves behind a barrier includes factors like barrier level and barrier efficiency. This segment of the diagram focuses on tsunami simulation and includes parameters such as assumed water depth, assumed tsunami height, and wave distribution after propagating over various terrains (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g004aSci 06 00039 g004b
Figure 5. Part of SD model: tsunami formation, variants of formation. Note: This image shows diagram sections comprising other possible tsunami sources. Compared to Figure 4a, these are rather minor in terms of importance and frequency of occurrence (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 5. Part of SD model: tsunami formation, variants of formation. Note: This image shows diagram sections comprising other possible tsunami sources. Compared to Figure 4a, these are rather minor in terms of importance and frequency of occurrence (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g005
Figure 6. Part of SD model: impact on population. Note: This figure captures how the affected population is influenced by the impact rate and population density in the affected area. Mortality rate and injury rate determine the number of deaths and injured people, respectively. The diagram also includes the role of paramedics, showing how their assistance is divided between the unaffected and affected areas. Finally, the environment, specifically contaminated water, plays a role in the health outcomes of both injured people and rescuers, contributing to fatal injuries and deaths (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 6. Part of SD model: impact on population. Note: This figure captures how the affected population is influenced by the impact rate and population density in the affected area. Mortality rate and injury rate determine the number of deaths and injured people, respectively. The diagram also includes the role of paramedics, showing how their assistance is divided between the unaffected and affected areas. Finally, the environment, specifically contaminated water, plays a role in the health outcomes of both injured people and rescuers, contributing to fatal injuries and deaths (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g006
Figure 7. Part of SD model: impact on buildings. Note: This segment of the diagram focuses on the impact of a tsunami on buildings, specifically considering the assumed maximum tsunami height barrier. The flow depth and intensity of destruction affect the average level of damage to buildings. Damaged buildings are then categorized based on the rate of destruction (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 7. Part of SD model: impact on buildings. Note: This segment of the diagram focuses on the impact of a tsunami on buildings, specifically considering the assumed maximum tsunami height barrier. The flow depth and intensity of destruction affect the average level of damage to buildings. Damaged buildings are then categorized based on the rate of destruction (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g007
Figure 8. Part of SD model: impact on infrastructure. Note: This figure shows the infrastructure that a wave can damage or destroy. Several types of materials for each part can suffer from the tsunami impact. For example, water pipes can be plastic, copper, or steel (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 8. Part of SD model: impact on infrastructure. Note: This figure shows the infrastructure that a wave can damage or destroy. Several types of materials for each part can suffer from the tsunami impact. For example, water pipes can be plastic, copper, or steel (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g008
Figure 9. Part of SD model: financial impact. Note: This figure shows the financial aspect of the model, namely the income side. It considers state support and international financial aid, which usually comes with a delay (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 9. Part of SD model: financial impact. Note: This figure shows the financial aspect of the model, namely the income side. It considers state support and international financial aid, which usually comes with a delay (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g009
Figure 10. Part of SD model: self-elevating seawalls. Note: This figure exhibits the mechanism of self-elevating seawalls. This part of the model can be switched off as required. This option reflects the requirements of reality, where not every area can have this type of barrier (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 10. Part of SD model: self-elevating seawalls. Note: This figure exhibits the mechanism of self-elevating seawalls. This part of the model can be switched off as required. This option reflects the requirements of reality, where not every area can have this type of barrier (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g010
Figure 11. Part of SD model: breakwaters (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 11. Part of SD model: breakwaters (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g011
Figure 12. Part of SD model: vertical deep barrier (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 12. Part of SD model: vertical deep barrier (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g012
Figure 13. Part of SD model: Caisson breakwater (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 13. Part of SD model: Caisson breakwater (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g013
Figure 14. Part of SD model: influence of coastal vegetation. Note: This figure shows the impact of the wave on the vegetation and vice versa. There are several types of vegetation in this part of the model, and different vegetation parameters are assumed (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 14. Part of SD model: influence of coastal vegetation. Note: This figure shows the impact of the wave on the vegetation and vice versa. There are several types of vegetation in this part of the model, and different vegetation parameters are assumed (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g014
Figure 15. Part of SD model: impact on fauna and flora. Note: This part of the model shows the impact of the wave on fauna and flora. The amount of waste moved into the sea and the amount of marine life destroyed are examples of the main indicators monitored here (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 15. Part of SD model: impact on fauna and flora. Note: This part of the model shows the impact of the wave on fauna and flora. The amount of waste moved into the sea and the amount of marine life destroyed are examples of the main indicators monitored here (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g015
Figure 16. Temporal dynamics of casualties and emergency response following a tsunami. Note: The vertical axis is monitored in units of People; all three variables can reach values between predefined minima and maxima (Injured people min = 0, max = 80,000; Dead people min = 0, max = 500; Paramedics in the affected area min = 300, max = 1100) (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 16. Temporal dynamics of casualties and emergency response following a tsunami. Note: The vertical axis is monitored in units of People; all three variables can reach values between predefined minima and maxima (Injured people min = 0, max = 80,000; Dead people min = 0, max = 500; Paramedics in the affected area min = 300, max = 1100) (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g016
Figure 17. Infrastructure damage assessment over time after tsunami impact. Note: Monitor variables have predefined maximal values (Destroyed roads max = 500, Destroyed plastic water pipes max = 10,000, Destroyed steal water pipes max = 20,000, Destroyed railways max = 400, Destroyed copper water pipes max = 20,000) (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Figure 17. Infrastructure damage assessment over time after tsunami impact. Note: Monitor variables have predefined maximal values (Destroyed roads max = 500, Destroyed plastic water pipes max = 10,000, Destroyed steal water pipes max = 20,000, Destroyed railways max = 400, Destroyed copper water pipes max = 20,000) (own work; software: Stella Professional).
Sci 06 00039 g017
Figure 18. Simulation of barrier effectiveness in wave height reduction (own work; software: MatLab).
Figure 18. Simulation of barrier effectiveness in wave height reduction (own work; software: MatLab).
Sci 06 00039 g018
Figure 19. Impact of barrier efficiency on wave height attenuation (own work; software: MatLab).
Figure 19. Impact of barrier efficiency on wave height attenuation (own work; software: MatLab).
Sci 06 00039 g019
Table 1. SW tools and research methods were applied to analyzed studies.
Table 1. SW tools and research methods were applied to analyzed studies.
Author(s) and YearCitationSoftwareMethodsApplication
Liu et al., 2020[20]OpenFOAMCFD, FAM, FVM, MULES, PIMPLETo simulate breaking wave-induced seabed scour and coastal erosion. It aims to understand and evaluate nearshore tsunami deposit transport processes, particularly around offshore structures like monopiles.
Qin, Motley, LeVeque, et al., 2018[21]GeoClaw, OpenFOAMCFD, NSWE, PISO, VOFCompares GeoClaw, a 2D depth-integrated model, and OpenFOAM, a 3D model based on tsunami inundation modeling.
Autret et al., 2016[22]Agisoft, ArcGISDEMInvestigates large clastic cliff-top storm deposits on Banneg Island during the stormy winter of 2013–2014 to understand the impacts of extreme storm waves on rocky coasts.
Xiong et al., 2019[23]HAZUSDEM, SWEpresents a deterministic approach for assessing large-scale building damage from tsunamis by quantifying lateral loading on structures induced by tsunami waves. Utilizing a depth-averaged hydrodynamic model that solves 2D nonlinear shallow water equations.
Bellotti, 2020[24]MATLABFEMModel for evaluating long wave amplification in coastal areas using a modal decomposition method to amplify natural modes under forcing waves.
Abril and Periáñez, 2017[25]MATLABFFTPresents numerical simulations of the tsunami triggered by the 1995 Nuweiba earthquake in the Gulf of Aqaba, aligning well with available observations. It explores 12 potential tsunamigenic sources in the Red Sea.
Yao et al., 2020[26]OpenFOAMCFD, MULES, PIMPLE, VOFEnhance the understanding of tsunami-like solitary wave run-up reduction by pile breakwaters on a sloping beach, a 3D numerical wave tank.
Tan et al., 2018[27]Delft3DSPHIntroduces a numerical landslide-tsunami hazard assessment technique applicable to reservoirs, lakes, fjords, and seas.
Knighton and Bastidas, 2015[28]Delft3DMONTE CARLO, PTHAEnhances existing probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis by differentiating between epistemic and aleatory uncertainties.
Horrillo et al., 2013[29]FLOW3DCFDIntroduces and validates TSUNAMI3D, a simplified 3D Navier–Stokes model designed for computational efficiency for simulating water and landslide interactions.
Kevlahan et al., 2015[30]MATLABGKS, MOSTIntroduces a new mass and energy-conserving Brinkman penalization for the rotating Shallow Water Equations, designed to enforce solid-wall boundary conditions with complex coastlines easily.
Aristodemo et al., 2020[31]OpenFOAMCFD, VOFInvestigates the hydrodynamic forces exerted by solitary waves on horizontal circular cylinders near a rigid bed through experimental and numerical methods.
Wang and Liu, 2011[32]COMCOTLSWE, NSWEModifying leap-frog finite difference scheme to solve Nonlinear Shallow Water Equations.
Völker et al., 2011[33]MB-SystemDEMCompares bathymetric datasets from before and after the Mw 8.8 Maule Earthquake on 27 February 2010 offshore Central Chile, finding no new submarine landslides more enormous than 1 km as a direct consequence of the earthquake.
Flouri et al., 2013[34]ArcGISDEM, NSWEEmploys a splitting method to reduce the hyperbolic system into two successive systems, solving the equations with a dispersive.
Restrepo A, 2012[35]DSASDEMExamines the physical and human-induced factors influencing the recent evolution of the Patía River delta.
Giraldi et al., 2017[36]GeoClawMAP, MONTE CARLOFocuses on estimating earthquake model parameters through the resulting tsunami, specifically applied to the 2010 Chile event.
Stefanakis et al., 2014[37]VOLNANSWEInvestigates whether small islands near the mainland offer protection from tsunamis.
Abril-Hernández et al., 2018[38]QGISDEMAnalyzes the outflow dynamics of Lake Bonneville breached at the Marsh Creek Fan.
Mehrotra et al., 2015[39]MATLABFCM, PCAThe proposed method involves image classification with a radial basis function neural network and a generalized improved fuzzy partition FCM algorithm.
Amante, 2018[40]MB-SystemDEMTo develop and apply a methodology for estimating and mapping vertical errors in integrated bathymetric–topographic DEMs along coastal regions.
Mitsui et al., 2016[41]OpenFOAMCFDAnalyze the fluid forces acting on the armor blocks during tsunami overflow.
Zhu and Dong, 2020[42]ANSYSCFDThrough laboratory experiments and CFD analysis, investigate the vertical and horizontal forces induced by solitary waves on coastal bridges.
Förster et al., 2010[43]CALIBAMSTo understand the previous failure events and current hazard potential of the Mauritania Slide Complex along the NW-African continental margin.
Puga-Bernabéu et al., 2017[44]ArcGIS, Fledermaus AMS, DEMTo investigate the geomorphologic characteristics and evolutionary processes of the Gloria Knolls Slide complex on the Great Barrier Reef margin.
Bourget et al., 2010[45]CALIBAMSTo investigate the growth and evolution of the Late Quaternary turbidite system along the Makran convergent margin through high-resolution stratigraphy from deep-sea cores.
Smith et al., 2010[46]CALIBAMSTo examine the changes in relative sea level and their impact on human activity distribution in the Forth lowland, Scotland, from approximately 11,700 to 2000 calibrated years before the present.
Baumann et al., 2017[47]AgisoftDEMAnalyzing washover deposition processes and distinguishing between storm and tsunami overwash events by examining the washover deposits from the exceptional wave climate during the winter of 2013–2014 in the Bay of Biscay.
Ali et al., 2019[48]ANSYSVOFTo investigate the role of inland vegetation in reducing the energy of flood flows and minimizing structural damage.
Torres et al., 2019[49]COMCOTNSWE, LSWETo investigate tsunami-induced magnetic field disturbances by comparing observed magnetic records with computed magnetic fields for the 2010 and 2015 Chilean tsunamis.
Polonia et al., 2013[50]CALIBAMSTo re-evaluate the origin of the 20–25 m thick megaturbidite (Homogenite/Augias) in the Ionian Sea through geophysical surveys and sediment cores.
Dutykh and Clamond, 2016[51]MATLABFVCF, NSWETo propose a modified version of the NSWE for modeling irrotational surface waves under significant bottom variations in space and time.
Jing et al., 2012[52]AmiraSWETo develop a numerical model to simulate the behavior characteristics of harbor waves and investigate resonance phenomena.
Jiang et al., 2019[53]OpenFOAMCFD, MULES, PIMPLE, PISO, SIMPLE, VOFTo numerically examine the effects of tsunami-like hydrodynamic loading on free-standing structures with various architectural geometries using a multiphase numerical model based on the volume of fluid method in three-dimensional space.
Sarjamee et al., 2017[54]OpenFOAMCFD, FVM, VOFTo present and validate a fully coupled (hydrodynamic and morphologic) numerical model based on the open-source CFD package OpenFOAM, designed to simulate flow and morphology changes induced by a solitary wave on a sloping beach.
Li et al., 2019[55]OpenFOAMCFD, VOF
Ruffini et al., 2019[56]Delft3D, MATLABSPHUsing the hydrodynamic numerical model, quantify the effect of water body geometry on the propagation of large landslide tsunamis in the far field.
Wijetunge, 2010[57]COMCOTSWETo outline the field measurements and numerical modeling conducted to develop a high-resolution tsunami inundation map for Trincomalee on the east coast of Sri Lanka, which was heavily affected by the 2004 tsunami.
Ulvrová et al., 2014[58]COMCOTNSWETo assess tsunami hazards from underwater volcanic explosions by simulating tsunamis generated from a submerged vent in Karymskoye Lake, Kamchatka, and the Kolumbo submarine volcano near Santorini, Greece.
H. Zhang et al., 2019[59]HydroSed2DNSWETo investigate the damping effect of vegetation, specifically Pandanus odoratissimus, on tsunami wave run-up and land inundation on coastal beaches.
Kevlahan et al., 2019[60]MATLABSWETo address the problem of optimally determining the initial conditions for the one-dimensional SWE in an unbounded domain using a limited number of sea surface height observations.
Douglas and Nistor, 2015[61]OpenFOAMCFD, FVM, PISOTo investigate the propagation and structural interaction of tsunami-like bores using a multiphase three-dimensional numerical model.
Bartzke et al., 2016[62]MATLABSPHTo understand the hydrodynamic processes and tsunami deposit transport in gravel-dominated coastal environments, where storm waves, spring tides, bore waves, and tsunamis can form gravel bedforms.
San Pedro et al., 2017[63]CALIBAMSTo provide a new interpretation of the Augias deposit in the Ionian Sea, focusing on its sedimentary processes and origins.
Premasiri et al., 2015[64]MATLABGPRTo evaluate and mitigate tsunami hazards by reconstructing past tsunamis using coastal sediments deposited by tsunamis.
Cheff et al., 2019[65]ArcGISDEMTo evaluate the risks and evacuation needs associated with a potential near-field tsunami event from the Cascadia subduction zone, focusing on the Town of Tofino on Vancouver Island’s West Coast.
X. Zhang and Niu, 2020[66]ArcGISDEM, MONTE CARLO, PTHATo develop a more efficient approach to probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment that balances accuracy and feasibility. Traditional methods require many scenario simulations to account for uncertainties in seismic parameters.
Juran et al., 2019[67]OsiriX DICOMPCATo examine the factors influencing the adoption of latrines provided during post-2004 tsunami reconstruction efforts in India.
Sraj et al., 2017[68]tsunami-2dMONTE CARLOTo present an efficient method for inferring the fault slip distribution of the Tōhoku earthquake using water surface elevation data.
Triantafyllou et al., 2019[69]GeoClaw, MATLABMAP, MONTE CARLOTo conduct a comprehensive tsunami risk assessment for a coastal segment west of Heraklion, Crete, by considering the convolution of tsunami hazard, vulnerability of assets (e.g., buildings), and the economic value exposed.
Chen et al., 2020[70]GeowaveDEMTo propose using reciprocal Green’s functions (RGFs) as an effective tool for forecasting tsunamis generated by submarine landslides, which can sometimes produce higher waves than seismic tsunamis in areas close to the source and are more challenging to predict.
Reinhardt et al., 2010[71]CALIBAMSTo predict the recovery time of the Río Cruces to pre-1960 conditions following the significant subsidence caused by the 22 May 1960 Chilean earthquake, the largest on record with a magnitude of 9.5.
Stefanakis et al., 2015[72]VOLNANSWETo study the extreme characteristics of the run-up of transient long waves.
Álvarez-Gómez et al., 2011[73]COMCOTMONTE CARLOTo model the tsunami impact on the Spanish and North African coasts of the Alboran Sea, generated by several reliable seismic tsunamigenic sources in the area.
Çağatay et al., 2012[74]CALIBAMSTo analyze sedimentary earthquake records from the last 2400 years in the central Karamürsel Basin of the İzmit Gulf, located in the eastern Sea of Marmara.
Dahanayake et al., 2012[75]CALIBAMSTo analyze the sediments deposited by the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman tsunamigenic earthquake in various coastal and inland locations of Sri Lanka.
Vött et al., 2010[76]CALIBAMSTo present evidence of multiple tsunami impacts on the Bay of Palairos-Pogonia, NW Greece, during the Holocene, based on detailed geoscientific studies.
Yakupoğlu et al., 2019[77]CALIB, R-studioAMSTo examine the Holocene earthquake history of the Central High Segment of the North Anatolian Fault by analyzing seismoturbidities within a 21 m long piston core recovered from the Kumburgaz Basin in the Sea of Marmara.
Stiros and Blackman, 2014[78]CALIBAMSTo shed light on the sequence of coastal uplift and subsidence along the coasts of Rhodes Island, mainly focusing on archaeological evidence from a 2400-year-old harbor currently about 3 m above sea level.
Ma et al., 2019[79]ICEM, OpenFOAMPIMPLE, VOFTo present a more accurate method for predicting the maximum run-up height and inundated area caused by tsunami events.
Sarfaraz and Pak, 2017[80]OpenFOAMSPHTo numerically derive tsunami wave loads on bridge superstructures using smoothed particle hydrodynamics.
Yang et al., 2020[81]ANSYSCFD, VOFTo investigate the generation mechanism and characteristics of peak values of tsunami bore vertical force on a scaled-down two-dimensional T-girder model.
Webster et al., 2016[82]ArcGISAMSTo investigate shallow submarine landslides along the central Great Barrier Reef and their potential to produce tsunamis.
Fabregat et al., 2019[83]CALIB, reflexWAMS, GPRTo demonstrate the practicality of integrated studies combining trenching, numerical dating, and shallow geophysical techniques to characterize the subsurface subsidence structure associated with sinkholes and reconstruct their deformational and sedimentary history.
Gylfadóttir et al., 2017[84]GeoClawDEM, SWETo analyze and model the tsunami generated by a giant rockslide that occurred on 21 July 2014 from the inner Askja caldera into Lake Askja, Iceland.
Higman et al., 2018[85]QGISDEMTo analyze the catastrophic slope failure at the terminus of Tyndall Glacier on 17 October 2015, which sent 180 million tons of rock into Taan Fiord, Alaska.
Xing et al., 2016[86]GambitCFD, DEM, VOFTo analyze and simulate the catastrophic rock avalanche that occurred at about 8:30 p.m. on 27 August 2014 in Fuquan, Yunnan, southwestern China.
Dall’Osso et al., 2014[87]ArcGISDEM, MOSTTo conduct a PTHA for the Sydney metropolitan area, addressing the significant gap in published PTHAs, including inundation for Australia.
Xie and Chu, 2019[88]OpenFOAMVOFTo investigate the hydrodynamic forces on coastal structures impacted by tsunamis, focusing on the effects of the wave Froude number, the sizes and shapes of the structures, and the initial conditions.
Creach et al., 2015[89]SPADMONTE CARLO, PCATo address the lessons learned from Storm Xynthia in February 2010, which caused a significant sea surge along the French Atlantic coast, flooding low-lying coastal areas, particularly urbanized regions.
Qin, Motley, and Marafi, 2018[90]OpenFOAMCFDTo enhance the understanding of tsunami inundation impacts on coastal communities, high-resolution 3D CFD modeling will be incorporated to simulate tsunami overland flow around existing macro-roughness features such as buildings and bridges.
Álvarez-Gómez et al., 2013[91]COMCOTNSWETo assess tsunami hazards along the coast of El Salvador, the smallest and most densely populated country in Central America.
DeDontney and Rice, 2012[92]COMCOTFFTTo resolve the disparity in tsunami lead wave morphologies observed by two satellites.
Cariolet, 2010[93]ArcGISDEMTo map and analyze the coastal areas in western Brittany that were inundated during a storm on 10 March 2008
Boshenyatov and Zhiltsov, 2019[94]OpenFOAMPISO, VOFTo investigate the energy losses of tsunami-like waves due to the formation of large eddies near underwater barriers, an area of growing importance.
Reynolds et al., 2015[95]ArcGIS, Delft3DDEMTo assess the impact of sea-level rise and wave-driven flooding on seabird colonies in the Pacific, mainly focusing on a globally important seabird rookery at Midway Atoll in the subtropical Pacific.
Benazir et al., 2023[96]COMCOTSWETo reflect on the progress of tsunami preparedness in a coastal community in Aceh, Indonesia, nearly two decades after the catastrophic 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami.
Rauter et al., 2021[97]OpenFOAMCFD, PISO, MULESTo evaluate the performance of the multiphase Navier–Stokes equations implemented in OpenFOAM for simulating impulse wave generation by landslides.
Nemati et al., 2023[98]ArcGIS, MATLABDEMTo report the results of numerical simulations for a potential subaerial landslide on the coast of Orcas Island and the resultant tsunami waves in the southern Strait of Georgia.
Guo and Lo, 2022[99]OpenFOAMCFD, PIMPLE, VOFTo investigate the hydrodynamics of a solitary wave passing a vertical cylinder over a viscous mud bed for the first time.
Attili et al., 2021[100]OpenFOAMFVM, PIMPLE, VOFTo focus on the numerical modeling of landslide tsunamis impacting dams.
Pakoksung et al., 2021[101]QGISDEM, PTHATo perform a probabilistic hazard analysis of a tsunami generated by a subaqueous volcanic explosion at Taal Lake, located on Luzon Island in the Philippines.
Song et al., 2023[102]OpenFOAMVOFTo investigate the impacts of tsunami-like waves on coastal bridge decks with superelevation, addressing a gap in existing research that typically focuses on wave impacts on flat bridge decks.
Elsheikh et al., 2022[103]OpenFOAMCFD, FVMTo investigate the hydrodynamics of turbulent bores that propagate on a horizontal plane, closely resembling dam-break waves and tsunami-like hydraulic bores.
Rahuman et al., 2022[104]ANSYSCFDTo visualize and compare the fluid flow patterns around the Rhizophora mangrove species’ stilt roots and the Avicennia mangrove species’ pneumatophore roots in the Pichavaram mangrove forest.
Amina and Tanaka, 2022[105]ANSYSCFD, VOF, SIMPLEUsing numerical simulations to predict how Free Surface Level variations around finite-length vegetation affect flow structure.
Liu and Hayatdavoodi, 2023[106]OpenFOAMVOF, CFDTo investigate the impact of waves and bores generated by broken solitary waves on horizontal decks of coastal structures.
Paulin et al., 2022[107]MATLABMAPTo enhance the 4D-Var method for filtering partially observed nonlinear chaotic dynamical systems by improving the accuracy of the initial condition estimation and subsequent propagation via model dynamics.
Kalligeris et al., 2022[108]Agisoft, ArcGISDEMTo infer complete tsunami hydrographs from field measurements and to report the first wave arrival timing, polarity information, and tsunami height/run-up measurements for five islands.
Tong et al., 2023[109]MATLABMAPTo compute the probability of tsunamis reaching a certain size on shore based on earthquake-induced seafloor elevations.
Dai et al., 2021[110]QGISDEMTo simulate the formation of a weak layer in the mountainous slope leading to the Taan Fiord landslide and to analyze the triggering factors from a geotechnical engineering perspective.
Madden et al., 2023[111]GeoClawDEMTo leverage Google’s Tensor Processing Unit to rapidly evaluate different tsunami risk mitigation strategies, making high-performance computing accessible to communities.
Yuan et al., 2021[112]COMCOTPTHA, NSWE, LSWETo conduct a PTHA for mainland China and Taiwan Island.
Celikbas et al., 2023[113]ArcGISDEMTo assess tsunami evacuation planning for the Bodrum district along Turkey’s western coast, which faces significant tsunami risks due to the active seismicity in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea.
Zengaffinen-Morris et al., 2022[114]ArcGISPTHATo address the challenges in PTHA related to submarine landslides, which have been less explored than earthquake sources.
Mokhtarzadeh et al., 2022[115]OpenFOAMVOF, CFDTo present numerical simulations of impulsive waves generated by various landslides, including solid block, granular materials, and heavy block sinking.
Mu et al., 2023[116]OpenFOAMCFD, VOF, SIMPLE, PIMPLE, PISOTo investigate a three-dimensional dam-break flow scenario interacting with vertical circular and square cylinders using computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Dai et al., 2023[117]OpenFOAMSPHTo investigate submarine landslide tsunamis, a significant global geohazard.
Zhang et al., 2021[118]MATLABSWETo develop a numerical method, specifically a rezoning-type adaptive moving mesh discontinuous Galerkin method, for accurately solving the Shallow Water Equations over non-flat bottom topography.
Ersoy et al., 2022[119]ArcGISVOF, CFDTo assess the potential risk posed by impulse waves originating from concurrent landslides in Çetin Dam Reservoir in Southeast Turkey, located near an active orogenic belt.
Paris et al., 2021[120]OpenFOAMCFD, PIMPLE, PISO, SIMPLETo model tsunamis generated by granular landslides.
Lo Re et al., 2022[121]MATLAB, QGISPTHA, DEMTo assess and quantify the vulnerability of buildings in Marzamemi, Sicily, to tsunami hazards.
Takegawa et al., 2023[122]OpenFOAMPISO, VOFTo investigate optimal dike shapes to mitigate tsunami overflow, focusing on numerical simulations based on waveforms from the Great East Japan Earthquake.
Table 2. Application of SW tools in particular research domains.
Table 2. Application of SW tools in particular research domains.
OpenFOAMArcGISMATLABCOMCOTCALIBANSYSDelft3DQGISGeoClawAgisoftTotal
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary384580133035
Oceanography853132111227
Engineering, Ocean1614102210027
Engineering, Civil1013103110020
Water Resources641310111018
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences332310101014
Engineering, Marine802002110014
Geochemistry and Geophysics00331000108
Engineering, Multidisciplinary20100100037
Multidisciplinary Sciences02001011005
Total5624231715109975
Note: These are selected fields and tools. For an overall overview, see Appendix A, Table A3. The fields of each article are retrieved from WoS. The number of fields varies for each article.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zanker, M.; Alhasnawi, B.N.; Babič, F.; Bureš, V.; Čech, P.; Husáková, M.; Mikulecký, P.; Nacházel, T.; Ponce, D.; Iqbal, S.; et al. Connecting Soft and Hard: An Integrating Role of Systems Dynamics in Tsunami Modeling and Simulation. Sci 2024, 6, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6030039

AMA Style

Zanker M, Alhasnawi BN, Babič F, Bureš V, Čech P, Husáková M, Mikulecký P, Nacházel T, Ponce D, Iqbal S, et al. Connecting Soft and Hard: An Integrating Role of Systems Dynamics in Tsunami Modeling and Simulation. Sci. 2024; 6(3):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zanker, Marek, Bilal Naji Alhasnawi, František Babič, Vladimír Bureš, Pavel Čech, Martina Husáková, Peter Mikulecký, Tomáš Nacházel, Daniela Ponce, Salman Iqbal, and et al. 2024. "Connecting Soft and Hard: An Integrating Role of Systems Dynamics in Tsunami Modeling and Simulation" Sci 6, no. 3: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci6030039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop