Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

9 May 2024

Content Marketing Insights from Kuwait Banking Industry: Matching Managers’ and Customers’ Perceptions of Social Media Posts Likability and Readability †

,
,
,
and
Department of Marketing and Events Management, College of Business, Australian University, Mubarak Al Abdullah 13015, Kuwait
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Scientific Conference On Digitalization, Innovations & Sustainable Development: Trends And Business Perspectives, West Mishref, Kuwait, 29 November & 14 December 2023.

1. Objectives

The main objective is to measure the difference in the perceptions of bank marketing managers and their customers regarding the likeability, readability and responsiveness of social media content. Other specific objectives include a comprehensive literature review to facilitate instrument development, data collection and analysis, and the identification of statistically significant differences between the bank managers’ and customers’ perceptions, considering their socio-demographic backgrounds.

2. Methodology

The existing scales from the literature will be adapted to measure the perceptions of bank managers and customers, having Instagram bank posts in Kuwait as a point of reference using a census approach for bank managers (10 banks) and a convenience sample of 200 customers. The most appropriate parametric or non-parametric test will be selected to test the statistically significant differences in perceptions. T-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests will be used on normally and non-normally distributed data. ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test will compare the mean scores of more than two groups, e.g., the perceptions of bank customers based on different educational levels or age groups.

3. Results

This study utilizes Breckler’s [1] theoretical model, which categorises attitudes into cognition (readability) [2,3], affect (likability) [4] and behaviour (responsiveness) [5,6]. The differences in perceptions between the bank managers and customers regarding the impact of the post headline features (exclamation, colon, question mark, sentiment and title length), post content features (text length, text tone and domain specificity) and media types used in posts (image, audio, video or text) on the above-mentioned constructs will be identified and explained based on the existing literature [5,7,8,9,10,11].

4. Implications

This research is aimed at helping the Kuwaiti banking sector develop brand post strategies more efficiently and effectively. This could be achieved through utilising more interactive posts and visual and audio cues to enhance the consumers’ cognitive, emotional and behavioural engagement. Therefore, this study will help bank managers increase their profits and growth, position themselves better in the market, improve communication with their customers, and introduce a meticulous scientific approach to social media studies.

5. Originality Value

From a methodological perspective, comparing the perceptions between bank marketing managers and customers regarding the likeability, readability and responsiveness of social media content is original and innovative. Furthermore, based on the initial literature review and to the best knowledge of the authors, no such research has been conducted on the banking industry in Kuwait.

6. Contribution

The research findings will aid in improving content creation via banks’ social media posts, as the study will shed light on the perceptions of content that appeal to the target audience regarding the elements of likability, readability and responsiveness. In return, this will lead to more engagement and the interactivity of current and potential clients on social media. Finally, this study provides a methodological contribution by the adapting scales used previously in the literature to examine the readability, likability and responsiveness of selected social media content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.d.l.R. and V.S.; Methodology: F.T.; Literature Review: A.J., V.S., F.A. and M.d.l.R.; Instrument Development: A.J. and F.T.; Data Collection: M.d.l.R.; Data Analysis: F.T. and F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Australian University, grant number IRC-2022/2023-COB-MARKETING-PR10.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is not available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breckler, S.J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1984, 47, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. She, J.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Fan, W.; Wang, H.; Chang, Q. Which social media posts generate the most buzz? Evidence from WeChat. Internet Res. 2022, 32, 273–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cai, X.; Cebollada, J.; Cortiñas, M. Impact of seller-and buyer-created content on product sales in the electronic commerce platform: The role of informativeness, readability, multimedia richness, and extreme valence. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 70, 103141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rietveld, R.; Van Dolen, W.; Mazloom, M.; Worring, M. What you feel, is what you like influence of message appeals on customer engagement on Instagram. J. Interact. Mark. 2020, 49, 20–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schultz, C.D. Proposing to your fans: Which brand post characteristics drive consumer engagement activities on social media brand pages? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2017, 26, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, L.; Ou, W.; Lee, C.S. Investigating consumers’ cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement in social media brand pages: A natural language processing approach. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2020, 54, 101179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Coelho, R.L.F.; Oliveira, D.S.D.; Almeida, M.I.S.D. Does social media matter for post typology? Impact of post content on Facebook and Instagram metrics. Online Inf. Rev. 2016, 40, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pletikosa Cvijikj, I.; Michahelles, F. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2013, 3, 843–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gkikas, D.C.; Tzafilkou, K.; Theodoridis, P.K.; Garmpis, A.; Gkikas, M.C. How do text characteristics impact user engagement in social media posts: Modeling content readability, length, and hashtags number in Facebook. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2022, 2, 100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Davis, S.W.; Horváth, C.; Gretry, A.; Belei, N. Say what? How the interplay of tweet readability and brand hedonism affects consumer engagement. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, T.; Guo, Q.; Chen, S.; Yang, J. What prompts users to click on news headlines? Evidence from unobtrusive data analysis. Aslib J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 72, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.