Next Article in Journal
Disrupting Androgen Receptor Functionality with Xanthones from the Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Australian Native Plant Foods and Their Contribution to Diet Diversity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

A New Method for the Authentication of Australian Honey †

1
Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
2
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019), Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 36(1), 112; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036112
Published: 3 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019))

Abstract

:
The honey bee industry in Australia is small but has a big impact on both producers and consumers. Alarmingly, it has been recently reported that an international laboratory, specializing in honey authentication, found that almost half of the 28 blended and imported honey samples selected from Australian supermarket shelves were “adulterated”. The Official method of honey analysis (AOAC 998.12) is based on the stable-isotope ratio mass spectrometry analysis of δ13C value of honey versus δ13C of honey protein to detect the addition of C4 plant derived sugars, such as cane sugar or high fructose corn syrup. This method is used as the primary C4 sugar adulteration test around the world, but honey derived from some Australian plants, particularly Manuka (Leptospermum species), fails this process. Our research aims to examine the characteristics of Australian honey and develop a test that is fit for purpose, particularly where honeys derived from Leptospermum species are concerned. We have focused on the isotopic values of “proteins” precipitated using the standard AOAC method and “proteins” precipitated after incorporation of a further modification step which removes insoluble material (including pollen) from the honey before precipitation. Our modified method includes the analysis of different isotopes of the precipitated protein, sugar profiles and Manuka markers. A key advantage of the proposed modification is that it does not preclude the detection of residual sugar feeding of bees or extension of honey with C4 sugar. The proposed modification to the AOAC test will reduce false identification of C4 sugars and improve the overall reliability of Australian honey authentication.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Methodology, S.A.C., J.F.C., S.R.A.; data analysis, S.A.C.; Writing—original draft preparation, S.A.C.; writing—review and editing, S.A.C., J.F.C., N.L.H., M.T.F.; funding acquisition, S.A.C.; supervision, M.T.F., J.F.C.

Funding

This research was funded by Queensland Health Grant RSS 18-022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chowdhury, S.A.; Anuj, S.R.; Carter, J.F.; Hungerford, N.L.; Webber, D.; Sultanbawa, Y.; Fletcher, M.T. A New Method for the Authentication of Australian Honey. Proceedings 2019, 36, 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036112

AMA Style

Chowdhury SA, Anuj SR, Carter JF, Hungerford NL, Webber D, Sultanbawa Y, Fletcher MT. A New Method for the Authentication of Australian Honey. Proceedings. 2019; 36(1):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chowdhury, Sadia A., Shalona R. Anuj, James F. Carter, Natasha L. Hungerford, Dennis Webber, Yasmina Sultanbawa, and Mary T. Fletcher. 2019. "A New Method for the Authentication of Australian Honey" Proceedings 36, no. 1: 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036112

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop