Bioproducts with Environmentally Low Input Suitable for Sugar beet †
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sacristán-Pérez-Minayo, G.; López-Robles, D.J.; Rad, C.; Miranda-Barroso, L. Microbial Inoculation for Productivity Improvements and Potential Biological Control in Sugar Beet Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 604898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szymańska, S.; Sikora, M.; Hrynkiewicz, K.; Tyburski, J.; Tretyn, A.; Gołębiewski, M. Choosing source of microorganisms and processing technology for next generation beet bioinoculant. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; Yang, F.; Wu, X.; Yan, H.; Liu, Y. Effects of continuous cropping of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) on its endophytic and soil bacterial community by high-throughput sequencing. Ann. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şahin, F.; Çakmakçi, R.; Kantar, F. Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil 2004, 265, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omar, A.M.; Hamed, O.M.A.; Abolela, M.F.KH.A.; Islam, M.S.; EL Sabagh, A. Bio-nitrogen Fertilization and Leaf Defoliation Increased Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 2019, 12, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veras, F.F.; Silveira, R.D.; Welke, J.E. Bacillus spp. as a strategy to control fungi and mycotoxins in food. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 52, 101068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaharie, M.G.O.; Radu, N.; Pirvu, L.; Bostan, M.; Voicescu, M.; Begea, M.; Constantin, M.; Voaides, C.; Babeanu, N.; Roman, V. Studies Regarding the Pharmaceutical Potential of Derivative Products from Plantain. Plants 2022, 11, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radu, N.; Chirvase, A.A.; Babeanu, N.; Begea, M. Entrepreneurship in the field of life sciences: The personal skills needed to start an innovative SME. Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 2019, 19, 375–379. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Raut, I.; Radu, N.; Mincea, C.; Doni, M.; Zaharia, R. Bioproducts with Environmentally Low Input Suitable for Sugar beet. Proceedings 2023, 90, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090004
Raut I, Radu N, Mincea C, Doni M, Zaharia R. Bioproducts with Environmentally Low Input Suitable for Sugar beet. Proceedings. 2023; 90(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090004
Chicago/Turabian StyleRaut, Iuliana, Nicoleta Radu, Carmen Mincea, Mihaela Doni, and Roxana Zaharia. 2023. "Bioproducts with Environmentally Low Input Suitable for Sugar beet" Proceedings 90, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090004
APA StyleRaut, I., Radu, N., Mincea, C., Doni, M., & Zaharia, R. (2023). Bioproducts with Environmentally Low Input Suitable for Sugar beet. Proceedings, 90(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023090004