Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

5 February 2024

The Effect of Storage Temperature on Chocolate Texture †

,
and
1
Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
Fazer Kvarn, Kartåsgatan 5A, 531 40 Lidköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.

Abstract

The texture of a particular food product has great significance for the sensory perception of its overall quality. When it comes to chocolate, texture as hardness plays an important role not only for visual evaluation (surface appearance), but also for the sensory perception of chocolate melting in the mouth. This feature is affected by many factors, whereas the composition of chocolate (particularly fat content), the size and distribution of solid particles, as well as the storage temperature are the prime ones. The aim of this experiment was to test the texture of chocolate, depending on its type (white, milk, and dark) stored at three different temperatures (16, 20, and 25 °C), which is the most typical consumption temperature range. The texture of the chocolate samples was examined instrumentally using a texture analyzer and through sensory analysis carried out by skilled panelists. The obtained results showed that the influence of the storage temperature and the type of chocolate has a statistically significant impact on chocolate’s hardness when determined by instrument, while in sensory evaluation, the type of chocolate is a predominant influencing factor. The hardness of chocolate was the lowest in white chocolate samples, and it decreased at higher storage temperatures, as expected. The sensory perception of chocolate melting was notably affected by the chocolate hardness. The general outcomes of the study have shown that there is a positive correlation between instrumental and sensory analysis methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O.Ž., A.O. and L.M.; methodology, S.O.Ž. and A.O.; software, A.O.; validation, S.O.Ž.; formal analysis, L.M. and A.O.; investigation, A.O. and L.M.; resources, S.O.Ž. and L.M.; data curation, A.O. and L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.O.Ž., L.M. and A.O.; writing—review and editing, S.O.Ž. and A.O.; visualization, A.O. and S.O.Ž.; supervision, S.O.Ž. project administration, S.O.Ž.; funding acquisition, S.O.Ž. and L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the reported results are available at request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.